Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. Inheritance according to Qur?an

Inheritance according to Qur?an

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
1.0k Posts 45 Posters 165.6k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • N Offline
    N Offline
    Noon_waalqalami
    wrote on last edited by
    #672

    "To the male the share of the two females" (also for patriarchal reasons?) where is it in your table ?

    peace, doesn't say male always gets twice each female rather to the male/s = exactly two females (hence two have to be present to apply)

    https//i.postimg.cc/dQZ0cvL2/inheritance-4-11-and-4-176.jpg

    https//i.postimg.cc/D0vSsLwp/inheritance1.jpg

    https//i.postimg.cc/XYf0Mh8F/inheritance2.jpg

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M Offline
      M Offline
      Mazhar
      wrote on last edited by
      #673

      Quote from Mazhar on Today at 052319 AM
      Now it is total mockery.

      Quote Arabic words which say son will get one third. Don't throw it from your mind. Put it from Qur'an.

      It appears you've injured left side of brain now devoid of simple IF THEN logic; son is variable/unknown depends on others.

      IF child THEN father 1/6, mother 1/6 remainder 2/3
      IF 1 daughter she gets 1/22/3 = 1/3 and son 1/3
      IF 2 daughters THEN they get 1/3 and the son 1/3
      IF 3+ daughters they get 2/3
      2/3 = 4/9, son 2/9

      now your turn let's see if you have functioning brain please allocate parents and daughter?

      I predict you'll run away like always divert not answer questions what disingenuous cowards do!

      walad/son (erroneous! you really messed up!) now have more unknowns/variables, unsolvable!

      What is child? It is a vague word unless specified; boy or girl.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • N Offline
        N Offline
        Noon_waalqalami
        wrote on last edited by
        #674

        What is child? It is a vague word unless specified; boy or girl.

        as predicted clueless ran away/dodged simple question to allocate parents and daughter?

        2233
        not made to suffer parent (maternal) biwaladiha/in (due to) child hers
        and not parent (paternal) to him biwaladihi/in (due to) child his

        411
        and to parents two his (said person) to each one of them dual the sixth (1/6) from what left if be for him walad/child
        so if not beeth for him (said person) walad/child and inherit him parents dual his so to mother his the third (1/3)

        6100-101 and make they of to god associates of the jinn and creation them and attribute they of to him banina/sons wabanatin/and daughters in other than knowledge glorified be he and exalted he of what attributing originator the skies and the land how being to him walad/offspring and not it be to him companion his and creation each thing and he in each thing knower

        1977 have so seen thou the one reject in signs ours and said surely given I wealth wawaladan/and offspring of

        3133 O you the humankind heeds ye of lord yours and fears ye of day of not availed parent about waladihi/offspring his

        723 and indeed he exalted majesty lord ours not has taken companion his and not waladan/offspring of

        again, by translating walad/son (erroneous!) you ignorantly attributed to the almighty having daughters!

        peace!

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M Offline
          M Offline
          Mazhar
          wrote on last edited by
          #675

          Quote from Mazhar on Today at 123126 PM
          What is child? It is a vague word unless specified; boy or girl.

          as predicted clueless ran away/dodged simple question to allocate parents and daughter?

          2233
          not made to suffer parent (maternal) biwaladiha/in (due to) child hers
          and not parent (paternal) to him biwaladihi/in (due to) child his

          411
          and to parents two his (said person) to each one of them dual the sixth (1/6) from what left if be for him walad/child
          so if not beeth for him (said person) walad/child and inherit him parents dual his so to mother his the third (1/3)

          6100-101 and make they of to god associates of the jinn and creation them and attribute they of to him banina/sons wabanatin/and daughters in other than knowledge glorified be he and exalted he of what attributing originator the skies and the land how being to him walad/offspring and not it be to him companion his and creation each thing and he in each thing knower

          1977 have so seen thou the one reject in signs ours and said surely given I wealth wawaladan/and offspring of

          3133 O you the humankind heeds ye of lord yours and fears ye of day of not availed parent about waladihi/offspring his

          723 and indeed he exalted majesty lord ours not has taken companion his and not waladan/offspring of

          again, by translating walad/son (erroneous!) you ignorantly attributed to the almighty having daughters!

          peace!

          Is it ran away by me or you.

          You explain not what you mean by child and which Arabic word you have translated as child.

          child
          /tld/
          noun
          a young human being below the age of puberty or below the legal age of majority.
          "she'd been playing tennis since she was a child"
          synonyms youngster, young one, little one, boy, girl; More
          a son or daughter of any age.
          "when children leave home, parents can feel somewhat redundant"
          an immature or irresponsible person.
          "she's such a child!"

          Just clarify and stupidities will start emerging.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Offline
            M Offline
            Mazhar
            wrote on last edited by
            #676

            It appears you've injured left side of brain now devoid of simple IF THEN logic; son is variable/unknown depends on others.

            IF child THEN father 1/6, mother 1/6 remainder 2/3
            IF 1 daughter she gets 1/22/3 = 1/3 and son 1/3
            IF 2 daughters THEN they get 1/3 and the son 1/3
            IF 3+ daughters they get 2/3
            2/3 = 4/9, son 2/9

            now your turn let's see if you have functioning brain please allocate parents and daughter?

            I predict you'll run away like always divert not answer questions what disingenuous cowards do!

            walad/son (erroneous! you really messed up!) now have more unknowns/variables, unsolvable!

            The bold is allocation by you NOT by Qur'an. See what Qur'an allocated to One Female.

            http//haqeeqat.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.Arabic%20Text/004.%20An%20Nisa/4.11o.gif

            And if she (your offspring) was one female; then, one-half of that which the deceased has left is allocated for her. (Refer 411)

            I advised you to study about nouns and Anaphor resolution.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • N Offline
              N Offline
              Noon_waalqalami
              wrote on last edited by
              #677

              topic is beyond your comprehension (femalemale ratios) peace and good bye!

              Cairo, National Library qaf 47 one of oldest manuscripts 606-652 CE (95.4%)
              https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/4/vers/12/handschrift/73

              https//i.postimg.cc/CxFGJC3s/ch4v11-15.jpg

              Berlin, State Library ms.or.fol. 4313 (same manuscript) 606-652 CE (95.4%)
              https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/4/vers/176/handschrift/73

              https//i.postimg.cc/SxwtPMV1/ch4v172-ch5v2.jpg

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M Offline
                M Offline
                Mazhar
                wrote on last edited by
                #678

                Noon. sorry now you have lost your balance. You have understood how stupid idea you have been following for many years..

                You are not able to clarify one point which you stupidly thought the premises. What is Child in your table. Is it is she, or is it he, is it minor, or grown up.

                Answer and avoid nonsense.

                Re Inheritance according to Qur�an
                ? Reply #670 on Yesterday at 112816 AM ?
                Quote
                Quote from Mazhar on Yesterday at 052319 AM
                Now it is total mockery.

                Quote Arabic words which say son will get one third. Don't throw it from your mind. Put it from Qur'an.

                It appears you've injured left side of brain now devoid of simple IF THEN logic; son is variable/unknown depends on others.

                IF child THEN father 1/6, mother 1/6 remainder 2/3
                IF 1 daughter she gets 1/22/3 = 1/3 and son 1/3
                IF 2 daughters THEN they get 1/3 and the son 1/3
                IF 3+ daughters they get 2/3
                2/3 = 4/9, son 2/9

                now your turn let's see if you have functioning brain please allocate parents and daughter?

                I predict you'll run away like always divert not answer questions what disingenuous cowards do!

                walad/son (erroneous! you really messed up!) now have more unknowns/variables, unsolvable!

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • N Offline
                  N Offline
                  Noon_waalqalami
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #679

                  What is Child in your table. Is it is she, or is it he, is it minor, or grown up.

                  definition 411 awladikum/offspring/children (any age) yours; walad (offspring/child any age)

                  6100-101 and make they of to god associates of the jinn and creation them and attribute they of to him banina/sons wabanatin/and daughters in other than knowledge glorified be he and exalted he of what attributing originator the skies and the land how being to him walad (offspring/child) and not it be to him companion his and creation each thing and he in each thing knower

                  man died leaves parents, wife, 3 children (daughters l-lata wal-uza and manat)

                  $120K inheritance allocate since you are smart?

                  http//www.answering-islam.org/Quran/Contra/i001.html

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • M Offline
                    M Offline
                    Mazhar
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #680

                    definition 411 awladikum/offspring/children (any age) yours; walad (offspring/child any age)

                    6100-101 and make they of to god associates of the jinn and creation them and attribute they of to him banina/sons wabanatin/and daughters in other than knowledge glorified be he and exalted he of what attributing originator the skies and the land how being to him walad (offspring/child) and not it be to him companion his and creation each thing and he in each thing knower

                    man died leaves parents, wife, 3 children (daughters l-lata wal-uza and manat)

                    $120K inheritance allocate since you are smart?

                    http//www.answering-islam.org/Quran/Contra/i001.html

                    You are gone into deep confusion.

                    The broken plural means children which can be plural number of daughters and sons. And grammatically it can be used for reference as singular feminine, but NOT singular masculine.

                    You are avoiding resolving your problem about child.

                    In the same table you say child 1/3 and then say daughter half of 2/3=1/3. You need to clear your mind what is "child" in your table, a boy or a girl/daughter or a son.

                    Take my advice. Find time to study about nouns, their gender, and plurality.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • N Offline
                      N Offline
                      Noon_waalqalami
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #681

                      In the same table you say child 1/3 and then say daughter half of 2/3=1/3.

                      411 the children are together (i.e. mixed ratios) male/s and female/s 2, 3+, 1

                      we are waiting for you/Mazhar to allocate $120K inheritance since you are smart?
                      man died leaves parents, wife, 3 children (daughters l-lata wal-uza and manat)

                      http//www.answering-islam.org/Quran/Contra/i001.html

                      Take my advice. Find time to study about nouns, their gender, and plurality.

                      2233 not made to suffer mother biwaladiha/in (due to) offspring/child (masculine noun) hers
                      1977 surely given I wealth wawaladan/and offspring (masculine noun) of
                      3133 not availed parent about waladihi/offspring (masculine noun) his

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • M Offline
                        M Offline
                        Mazhar
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #682

                        411 the children are together (i.e. mixed ratios) male/s and female/s 2, 3+, 1

                        we are waiting for you/Mazhar to allocate $120K inheritance since you are smart?
                        man died leaves parents, wife, 3 children (daughters l-lata wal-uza and manat)

                        http//www.answering-islam.org/Quran/Contra/i001.html

                        2233 not made to suffer mother biwaladiha/in (due to) offspring/child (masculine noun) hers
                        1977 surely given I wealth wawaladan/and offspring (masculine noun) of
                        3133 not availed parent about waladihi/offspring (masculine noun) his

                        In the first sentence there are two females and a male in the Aulaad. Their internal distribution is given. Not the share/fraction of what is left by the deceased parent.

                        Pl read Para 26-43 and try to rebut any point.

                        http//haqeeqat.pk/Economics-Inheritance.htm

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • N Offline
                          N Offline
                          Noon_waalqalami
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #683

                          Pl read Para 26-43 and try to rebut any point.

                          http//haqeeqat.pk/Economics-Inheritance.htm

                          rebuttal http//www.answering-islam.org/Quran/Contra/i001.html

                          let me break it down since you're beginner top critique among nonbelievers with marrying 9 year-old and wife beating.
                          no idea why you wrote inheritance article and you are clueless to allocate simple spouse, parents, and daughters?

                          according to you walad/son (erroneous!) and daughters are alone (erroneous! numerous contradictions!)

                          411
                          if three+ daughters they get 2/3
                          if no son and parents mother 1/3

                          already max no clue what to give father!

                          412
                          if no son husband 1/2
                          if no son wife gets 1/4

                          likewise clueless what to give spouse!

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • M Offline
                            M Offline
                            Mazhar
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #684

                            rebuttal http//www.answering-islam.org/Quran/Contra/i001.html

                            let me break it down since you're beginner top critique among nonbelievers with marrying 9 year-old and wife beating.
                            no idea why you wrote inheritance article and you are clueless to allocate simple spouse, parents, and daughters?

                            according to you walad/son (erroneous!) and daughters are alone (erroneous! numerous contradictions!)

                            411
                            if three+ daughters they get 2/3
                            if no son and parents mother 1/3

                            already max no clue what to give father!

                            412
                            if no son husband 1/2
                            if no son wife gets 1/4

                            likewise clueless what to give spouse!

                            Only slanders. You have totally exposed yourself that you lack even basic knowledge of Arabic. How sentences are structured to put meanings in them is far beyond your brain. Sorry to note that you do not even know types of noun and still have self assumed to be a scholar on Qur'aan.

                            http//haqeeqat.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.Arabic%20Text/004.%20An%20Nisa/4.11m.gif

                            This sentence is beyond your comprehension. You see only words. Sentence is far more than sum total of words. Do you know what type of sentence is this? How many are grammatical units in it? What is its tone.

                            If you know not these basic things avoid spreading your foolish ideas imagined.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • N Offline
                              N Offline
                              Noon_waalqalami
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #685

                              It's obvious to everyone reading that you are clueless on allocating even basic shares e.g. father and daughter/s?
                              This thread is on inheritance distributions which you are hijacking advertising dumb article on your website. If you don't like my distributions (it's there for the benefit of others) open your own thread stop hijacking this one go debate these guys who'll tear you to pieces since you lack even basic logic and cannot distribute anything!

                              http//www.sillyallah.com/2007/11/inheritance-mistake-in-detail-part-1.html

                              http//www.sillyallah.com/2007/11/inheritance-mistake-in-detail-part-2.html

                              http//www.answering-islam.org/Quran/Contra/i001.html

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • M Offline
                                M Offline
                                Mazhar
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #686

                                Only slanders. You have totally exposed yourself that you lack even basic knowledge of Arabic. How sentences are structured to put meanings in them is far beyond your brain. Sorry to note that you do not even know types of noun and still have self assumed to be a scholar on Qur'aan.

                                http//haqeeqat.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.Arabic%20Text/004.%20An%20Nisa/4.11m.gif

                                This sentence is beyond your comprehension. You see only words. Sentence is far more than sum total of words. Do you know what type of sentence is this? How many are grammatical units in it? What is its tone.

                                If you know not these basic things avoid spreading your foolish ideas imagined.

                                What is hampering to talk about the basic part of the discourse on inheritance. Are you clueless, or afraid that you whole story will fall.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • N Offline
                                  N Offline
                                  Noon_waalqalami
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #687

                                  summary "all cases" shares always equal exactly 1 and never over/under!

                                  411/4176 to the male (i.e. gender) similitude apportion the two/females
                                  applies if at least two females are present -- never with only one/female!

                                  https//i.postimg.cc/dQZ0cvL2/inheritance-4-11-and-4-176.jpg

                                  Cairo, National Library qaf 47 one of oldest manuscripts dated 606-652 CE (95.4%)
                                  https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/4/vers/12/handschrift/73

                                  ch4v11-12 translation https//i.postimg.cc/CxFGJC3s/ch4v11-15.jpg

                                  Berlin, State Library ms.or.fol. 4313 (same manuscript) dated 606-652 CE (95.4%)
                                  https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/4/vers/176/handschrift/73

                                  ch4v176 translation https//i.postimg.cc/SxwtPMV1/ch4v172-ch5v2.jpg

                                  https//i.postimg.cc/JzrV1jWp/inheritance1.jpg

                                  https//i.postimg.cc/tCzwm7VW/inheritance2.jpg

                                  13 years since joining this site, only 3 verses!

                                  peace all the best to everyone! peace

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • M Offline
                                    M Offline
                                    Mazhar
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #688

                                    Noon, can you move with me step by step. You are at liberty to accept or rebut by evidence NOT by gossip.

                                    Part-I. Definition of inheritance; Arabic Root for semantic domain of inheritance and Roots that collocate

                                    1. Inheritance is the practice of passing on the property, movable and immovable assets, debts and obligations upon the death of an individual. The concept of inheritance is embedded in Root . Ibn Faris stated

                                    ( &#1577

                                    . .

                                    That it refers to the thing owned by persons which thereafter is turned towards later generation by lineage/kinship and/or for some other reason.

                                    1. It thus denotes inheritance, transfer of sustenance to heirs called they who inherit (money, property, heritage) as an heir at the death of previous holder. They can be only those who are for the deceased plural noun (three or more) meaning kinsfolk, or beneficiaries for some other reason, like under patronage person (in common parlance adopted son). It stems from Root . According to Ibn Faris its primarily signification is

                                    .

                                    That it leads to the perception of nearness; adjacent.

                                    Dear can you deny these facts?

                                    If we proceed logically we can better revisit and evaluate the accuracy of what we have been understanding. Let us learn.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • The_SardarT Offline
                                      The_SardarT Offline
                                      The_Sardar
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #689

                                      summary "all cases" shares always equal exactly 1 and never over/under!

                                      411/4176 to the male (i.e. gender) similitude apportion the two/females
                                      applies if at least two females are present -- never with only one/female!

                                      https//i.postimg.cc/dQZ0cvL2/inheritance-4-11-and-4-176.jpg

                                      Cairo, National Library qaf 47 one of oldest manuscripts dated 606-652 CE (95.4%)
                                      https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/4/vers/12/handschrift/73

                                      ch4v11-12 translation https//i.postimg.cc/CxFGJC3s/ch4v11-15.jpg

                                      Berlin, State Library ms.or.fol. 4313 (same manuscript) dated 606-652 CE (95.4%)
                                      https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/4/vers/176/handschrift/73

                                      ch4v176 translation https//i.postimg.cc/SxwtPMV1/ch4v172-ch5v2.jpg

                                      https//i.postimg.cc/JzrV1jWp/inheritance1.jpg

                                      https//i.postimg.cc/tCzwm7VW/inheritance2.jpg

                                      13 years since joining this site, only 3 verses!

                                      peace all the best to everyone! peace

                                      Salam/Peace Noon, i hope that does not mean you are leaving or something? By the way, i agree with you on this Inheritance issues is due to Hadith involvement of translation.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • The_SardarT Offline
                                        The_SardarT Offline
                                        The_Sardar
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #690

                                        Also Noon, these link that uses mistranslation of 411-13 are used to be debunked? Because this thread is about debunking the mistranslation the verses that the mistranslation is due to hadith influence.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • M Offline
                                          M Offline
                                          Mazhar
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #691

                                          Also Noon, these link that uses mistranslation of 411-13 are used to be debunked? Because this thread is about debunking the mistranslation the verses that the mistranslation is due to hadith influence.

                                          Elaborate. where is influence of hadith on translation.

                                          Give separate translations which you think is influenced by hadith.

                                          This hadith mockery is a fraudulent technique to mislead people.

                                          Come with explicit s/

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users