Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. Inheritance according to Qur?an

Inheritance according to Qur?an

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
1.0k Posts 45 Posters 165.6k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • N Offline
    N Offline
    Noon_waalqalami
    wrote on last edited by
    #683

    Pl read Para 26-43 and try to rebut any point.

    http//haqeeqat.pk/Economics-Inheritance.htm

    rebuttal http//www.answering-islam.org/Quran/Contra/i001.html

    let me break it down since you're beginner top critique among nonbelievers with marrying 9 year-old and wife beating.
    no idea why you wrote inheritance article and you are clueless to allocate simple spouse, parents, and daughters?

    according to you walad/son (erroneous!) and daughters are alone (erroneous! numerous contradictions!)

    411
    if three+ daughters they get 2/3
    if no son and parents mother 1/3

    already max no clue what to give father!

    412
    if no son husband 1/2
    if no son wife gets 1/4

    likewise clueless what to give spouse!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M Offline
      M Offline
      Mazhar
      wrote on last edited by
      #684

      rebuttal http//www.answering-islam.org/Quran/Contra/i001.html

      let me break it down since you're beginner top critique among nonbelievers with marrying 9 year-old and wife beating.
      no idea why you wrote inheritance article and you are clueless to allocate simple spouse, parents, and daughters?

      according to you walad/son (erroneous!) and daughters are alone (erroneous! numerous contradictions!)

      411
      if three+ daughters they get 2/3
      if no son and parents mother 1/3

      already max no clue what to give father!

      412
      if no son husband 1/2
      if no son wife gets 1/4

      likewise clueless what to give spouse!

      Only slanders. You have totally exposed yourself that you lack even basic knowledge of Arabic. How sentences are structured to put meanings in them is far beyond your brain. Sorry to note that you do not even know types of noun and still have self assumed to be a scholar on Qur'aan.

      http//haqeeqat.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.Arabic%20Text/004.%20An%20Nisa/4.11m.gif

      This sentence is beyond your comprehension. You see only words. Sentence is far more than sum total of words. Do you know what type of sentence is this? How many are grammatical units in it? What is its tone.

      If you know not these basic things avoid spreading your foolish ideas imagined.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • N Offline
        N Offline
        Noon_waalqalami
        wrote on last edited by
        #685

        It's obvious to everyone reading that you are clueless on allocating even basic shares e.g. father and daughter/s?
        This thread is on inheritance distributions which you are hijacking advertising dumb article on your website. If you don't like my distributions (it's there for the benefit of others) open your own thread stop hijacking this one go debate these guys who'll tear you to pieces since you lack even basic logic and cannot distribute anything!

        http//www.sillyallah.com/2007/11/inheritance-mistake-in-detail-part-1.html

        http//www.sillyallah.com/2007/11/inheritance-mistake-in-detail-part-2.html

        http//www.answering-islam.org/Quran/Contra/i001.html

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M Offline
          M Offline
          Mazhar
          wrote on last edited by
          #686

          Only slanders. You have totally exposed yourself that you lack even basic knowledge of Arabic. How sentences are structured to put meanings in them is far beyond your brain. Sorry to note that you do not even know types of noun and still have self assumed to be a scholar on Qur'aan.

          http//haqeeqat.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.Arabic%20Text/004.%20An%20Nisa/4.11m.gif

          This sentence is beyond your comprehension. You see only words. Sentence is far more than sum total of words. Do you know what type of sentence is this? How many are grammatical units in it? What is its tone.

          If you know not these basic things avoid spreading your foolish ideas imagined.

          What is hampering to talk about the basic part of the discourse on inheritance. Are you clueless, or afraid that you whole story will fall.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • N Offline
            N Offline
            Noon_waalqalami
            wrote on last edited by
            #687

            summary "all cases" shares always equal exactly 1 and never over/under!

            411/4176 to the male (i.e. gender) similitude apportion the two/females
            applies if at least two females are present -- never with only one/female!

            https//i.postimg.cc/dQZ0cvL2/inheritance-4-11-and-4-176.jpg

            Cairo, National Library qaf 47 one of oldest manuscripts dated 606-652 CE (95.4%)
            https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/4/vers/12/handschrift/73

            ch4v11-12 translation https//i.postimg.cc/CxFGJC3s/ch4v11-15.jpg

            Berlin, State Library ms.or.fol. 4313 (same manuscript) dated 606-652 CE (95.4%)
            https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/4/vers/176/handschrift/73

            ch4v176 translation https//i.postimg.cc/SxwtPMV1/ch4v172-ch5v2.jpg

            https//i.postimg.cc/JzrV1jWp/inheritance1.jpg

            https//i.postimg.cc/tCzwm7VW/inheritance2.jpg

            13 years since joining this site, only 3 verses!

            peace all the best to everyone! peace

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M Offline
              M Offline
              Mazhar
              wrote on last edited by
              #688

              Noon, can you move with me step by step. You are at liberty to accept or rebut by evidence NOT by gossip.

              Part-I. Definition of inheritance; Arabic Root for semantic domain of inheritance and Roots that collocate

              1. Inheritance is the practice of passing on the property, movable and immovable assets, debts and obligations upon the death of an individual. The concept of inheritance is embedded in Root . Ibn Faris stated

              ( &#1577

              . .

              That it refers to the thing owned by persons which thereafter is turned towards later generation by lineage/kinship and/or for some other reason.

              1. It thus denotes inheritance, transfer of sustenance to heirs called they who inherit (money, property, heritage) as an heir at the death of previous holder. They can be only those who are for the deceased plural noun (three or more) meaning kinsfolk, or beneficiaries for some other reason, like under patronage person (in common parlance adopted son). It stems from Root . According to Ibn Faris its primarily signification is

              .

              That it leads to the perception of nearness; adjacent.

              Dear can you deny these facts?

              If we proceed logically we can better revisit and evaluate the accuracy of what we have been understanding. Let us learn.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • The_SardarT Offline
                The_SardarT Offline
                The_Sardar
                wrote on last edited by
                #689

                summary "all cases" shares always equal exactly 1 and never over/under!

                411/4176 to the male (i.e. gender) similitude apportion the two/females
                applies if at least two females are present -- never with only one/female!

                https//i.postimg.cc/dQZ0cvL2/inheritance-4-11-and-4-176.jpg

                Cairo, National Library qaf 47 one of oldest manuscripts dated 606-652 CE (95.4%)
                https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/4/vers/12/handschrift/73

                ch4v11-12 translation https//i.postimg.cc/CxFGJC3s/ch4v11-15.jpg

                Berlin, State Library ms.or.fol. 4313 (same manuscript) dated 606-652 CE (95.4%)
                https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/4/vers/176/handschrift/73

                ch4v176 translation https//i.postimg.cc/SxwtPMV1/ch4v172-ch5v2.jpg

                https//i.postimg.cc/JzrV1jWp/inheritance1.jpg

                https//i.postimg.cc/tCzwm7VW/inheritance2.jpg

                13 years since joining this site, only 3 verses!

                peace all the best to everyone! peace

                Salam/Peace Noon, i hope that does not mean you are leaving or something? By the way, i agree with you on this Inheritance issues is due to Hadith involvement of translation.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • The_SardarT Offline
                  The_SardarT Offline
                  The_Sardar
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #690

                  Also Noon, these link that uses mistranslation of 411-13 are used to be debunked? Because this thread is about debunking the mistranslation the verses that the mistranslation is due to hadith influence.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • M Offline
                    M Offline
                    Mazhar
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #691

                    Also Noon, these link that uses mistranslation of 411-13 are used to be debunked? Because this thread is about debunking the mistranslation the verses that the mistranslation is due to hadith influence.

                    Elaborate. where is influence of hadith on translation.

                    Give separate translations which you think is influenced by hadith.

                    This hadith mockery is a fraudulent technique to mislead people.

                    Come with explicit s/

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • The_SardarT Offline
                      The_SardarT Offline
                      The_Sardar
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #692

                      Elaborate. where is influence of hadith on translation.

                      Give separate translations which you think is influenced by hadith.

                      This hadith mockery is a fraudulent technique to mislead people.

                      Come with explicit s/

                      I sadly don't remember which hadith it was but i think it was from Bukhari. Like i said i don't remember. Sorry if my answer is not good enough.

                      EDIT It seems brother Noon did actually mentioned a Hadith in the first page https//sunnah.com/urn/239370

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • M Offline
                        M Offline
                        Mazhar
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #693

                        What Noon is thinking as Inheritance that were the opinion of some that has noting relevant to words of Qur'an.

                        Qur'an nowhere allocates 1/3 of any denominator to a son. This is what Noon avoids to talk about. Qur'an allocates half of inheritance if there is only one female in Aulad.

                        Qur'an separates the deceased into three categories each exclusive from other.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • N Offline
                          N Offline
                          Noon_waalqalami
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #694

                          EDIT It seems brother Noon did actually mentioned a Hadith in the first page https//sunnah.com/urn/239370

                          peace, not only hadith -- horrid readings that lead to 100s of contradictions!
                          e.g. parents, 2 daughters contradiction! husband, 2 daughters contradiction!
                          ask any scholar in the world and they are clueless to allocate above correctly!

                          ch4v11 over two (3+) – cannot ever include two!
                          ch6v18 and he the subjugator over (not equal!) devotees his
                          ch4v176 exactly two – cannot ever be over two (3+)!

                          Dr. Mohamad Shahrour is the only scholar that came close
                          Rules of inheritance - Dr.Mohamad Shahrour (Episode.2)
                          https//www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFfvjAoRpIk

                          ch4v11 applies only when “mixed” children while single gender i.e. solitary son/s or daughter/s always variable get the remainder after parents and/or spouses; likewise, any sole heir always gets the whole e.g. parent, spouse, offspring/child (son/s, daughter/s), sibling (brother/s, sister/s), etc.

                          in "all cases" the shares always equal exactly 1 and never above/under!

                          Cairo, National Library qaf 47 one of oldest manuscripts dated 606-652 CE (95.4%)
                          https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/4/vers/12/handschrift/73
                          ch4v11-12 translation https//i.postimg.cc/CxFGJC3s/ch4v11-15.jpg

                          Berlin, State Library ms.or.fol. 4313 (same manuscript) dated 606-652 CE (95.4%)
                          https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/4/vers/176/handschrift/73
                          ch4v176 translation https//i.postimg.cc/SxwtPMV1/ch4v172-ch5v2.jpg

                          children & siblings https//i.postimg.cc/dQZ0cvL2/inheritance-4-11-and-4-176.jpg
                          children & parents, kalala https//i.postimg.cc/JzrV1jWp/inheritance1.jpg
                          children & spouses https//i.postimg.cc/tCzwm7VW/inheritance2.jpg

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • M Offline
                            M Offline
                            Mazhar
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #695

                            ch4v11 applies only when “mixed” children while single gender i.e. solitary son/s or daughter/s always variable get the remainder after parents and/or spouses; likewise, any sole heir always gets the whole e.g. parent, spouse, offspring/child (son/s, daughter/s), sibling (brother/s, sister/s), etc.

                            What a stupid resolution?

                            And if she (your offspring) was one female; then, one-half is allocated for her.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • N Offline
                              N Offline
                              Noon_waalqalami
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #696

                              ^^^ still spamming has not figured out to allocate parents, spouse, daughter/s nope

                              Rules of inheritance - Dr.Mohamad Shahrour (Episode.2)
                              https//www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFfvjAoRpIk

                              video made me think of one unresolved question
                              certain mixed gender children/siblings with 1 male

                              females multi ratio f/m distributions given 1 male

                              1 daughter 1.0x 11 1,1 1/2, 1/2 ... 411 and if be she one (daughter) so for her the half (1/2)
                              2 daughters 2.0x 12 2,1 1/4, 1/4, 1/2 ... 411 to the male similitude apportion the two females
                              3 daughters 1.5x 23 3,1 2/9, 2/9, 2/9, 1/3 ... 411 so if are womenfolk over two (3+) so for them third dual (2/3)
                              4 daughters 2.0x 12 4,1 1/6, 1/6, 1/6, 1/6, 1/3
                              5 daughters 2.5x 25 5,1 2/15, 2/15, 2/15, 2/15, 2/15, 1/3
                              6 daughters 3.0x 13 6,1 1/9, 1/9, 1/9, 1/9, 1/9, 1/9, 1/3

                              1 sister 1.0x 11 1,1 1/2, 1/2 ... 4176 and to him (said person) sister so for her half (1/2)
                              2 sisters 1.0x 11 2,1 1/3, 1/3, 1/3 ... 4176 so if be dual two females so to them dual the third each (2/3)
                              3 sisters 2.0x 12 3,1 1/5, 1/5, 1/5, 2/5 ... 4176 so to the male similitude apportion the two females
                              4 sisters 2.0x 12 4,1 1/6, 1/6, 1/6, 1/6, 1/3
                              5 sisters 2.0x 12 5,1 1/7, 1/7, 1/7, 1/7, 1/7, 2/7
                              6 sisters 2.0x 12 6,1 1/8, 1/8, 1/8, 1/8, 1/8, 1/8, 1/4

                              the question is do above same ratios apply adding more males?
                              e.g. 1 daughter/sister share equally with any # of sons/brothers?
                              OR 1 daughter/sister 1/2, 6 sons/brothers 1/2 (1/12 each?)

                              2 sisters 1/4 (1/8 each), 6 brothers 3/4 (1/8 each)
                              OR
                              2 sisters 2/3 (1/3 each), 6 brothers 1/3 (1/18 each?)

                              logically the same ratios given do hold when adding more males!

                              peace!

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • M Offline
                                M Offline
                                Mazhar
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #697

                                What a stupid resolution?

                                And if she (your offspring) was one female; then, one-half is allocated for her.

                                Just forget superfluous distribution. Do you accept this command or you reject it?

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • N Offline
                                  N Offline
                                  Noon_waalqalami
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #698

                                  ^^^ 411 where is the instruction what to give 2 solitary daughters, no sons?
                                  4176 where is the instruction what to give 3+ solitary sisters, no brothers?

                                  simple questions he repeatedly refuses to answer continues spamming!
                                  exactly same instructions solitary boys/girls, can only have 1 variable!

                                  1/3 parents (fixed 1/6 each), 2/3 two sons (variable 1/3 each)
                                  1/3 parents (fixed 1/6 each), 2/3 two daughters (variable 1/3 each)

                                  the instruction set mixed children ratio fm is given
                                  411 instructed you the god in offspring yours
                                  (case 2 females!) to the male similitude apportion the two females
                                  (case 3+ females!) so if are womenfolk over two females so for them 2/3
                                  (case 1 female!) and if be she one so for her the half (1/2)

                                  this is like teaching preschool children with attention deficit disorder symptoms.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • M Offline
                                    M Offline
                                    Mazhar
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #699

                                    What a stupid resolution?

                                    And if she (your offspring) was one female; then, one-half is allocated for her.

                                    1= 24 equal parts.

                                    According to this sentence of Ayah half went to one female (daughter-Noon calls it walad=child)= 12 parts

                                    Take note; One-sixth of that which he (the deceased son) has left behind is allocated separately for each of his bereaved Father and Mother. This direction is to take effect if solitary child is surviving for him (the deceased).

                                    One sixth to father = 4 parts
                                    one sixth to mother=4 parts.

                                    20 parts went.

                                    However, in case there was child (according to Noon) to grieve for you, thereby, the one-eighth is apportioned for them (bereaved wives) out of that which you have left.

                                    She gets- 3 parts.

                                    Total 23.

                                    To whom will go remaining part 1 and where is its mention dear Noon?

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • N Offline
                                      N Offline
                                      Noon_waalqalami
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #700

                                      ^^^ clueless rant hijacking the thread with continuous spamming!
                                      411 daughter 1/2 children mixed i.e. son/s present not solitary.
                                      again mazhar simply allocate father daughter?
                                      otherwise stop hijacking the thread!

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • M Offline
                                        M Offline
                                        Mazhar
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #701

                                        ^^^ clueless rant hijacking the thread with continuous spamming!
                                        411 daughter 1/2 children mixed i.e. son/s present not solitary.
                                        again mazhar simply allocate father daughter?
                                        otherwise stop hijacking the thread!

                                        Sentences of Ayah quoted are simple and specific. It is specifically mentioned if there was one child half will go to child.

                                        Simply answer the post. I know you have gone clueless.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • N Offline
                                          N Offline
                                          Noon_waalqalami
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #702

                                          Sentences of Ayah quoted are simple and specific. It is specifically mentioned if there was one child half will go to child.

                                          no read in context it is a loop gives ratios femalesmale nicely explained in video
                                          Rules of inheritance - Dr.Mohamad Shahrour (Episode.2)
                                          https//www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFfvjAoRpIk

                                          otherwise have 100s of contradictions in distributions e.g. parents daughter?

                                          https//i.postimg.cc/Hn9QCBmQ/inheritance-4-11-and-4-176.jpg

                                          females multi ratio f,m distributions given 1 male

                                          1 daughter 1.0x 11 1,1 1/2, 1/2 ... 411 and if be she one (daughter) so for her the half (1/2)
                                          2 daughters 2.0x 12 2,1 1/4, 1/4, 1/2 ... 411 to the male similitude apportion the two females
                                          3 daughters 1.5x 23 3,1 2/9, 2/9, 2/9, 1/3 ... 411 so if are womenfolk over two (3+) so for them third dual (2/3)
                                          4 daughters 2.0x 12 4,1 1/6, 1/6, 1/6, 1/6, 1/3
                                          5 daughters 2.5x 25 5,1 2/15, 2/15, 2/15, 2/15, 2/15, 1/3
                                          6 daughters 3.0x 13 6,1 1/9, 1/9, 1/9, 1/9, 1/9, 1/9, 1/3

                                          females multi ratio f,m distributions given 1 male

                                          1 sister 1.0x 11 1,1 1/2, 1/2 ... 4176 and to him (said person) sister so for her half (1/2)
                                          2 sisters 1.0x 11 2,1 1/3, 1/3, 1/3 ... 4176 so if be dual two females so to them dual the third each (2/3)
                                          3 sisters 2.0x 12 3,1 1/5, 1/5, 1/5, 2/5 ... 4176 so to the male similitude apportion the two females
                                          4 sisters 2.0x 12 4,1 1/6, 1/6, 1/6, 1/6, 1/3
                                          5 sisters 2.0x 12 5,1 1/7, 1/7, 1/7, 1/7, 1/7, 2/7
                                          6 sisters 2.0x 12 6,1 1/8, 1/8, 1/8, 1/8, 1/8, 1/8, 1/4

                                          above same ratios apply when adding more males
                                          e.g. 1 daughter shares equally with any # of sons
                                          e.g. 1 or 2 sisters share equally any # of brothers

                                          4176 shows the god for you lest thou err ye of and the god in every thing knower

                                          peace!

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users