Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. Inheritance according to Qur?an

Inheritance according to Qur?an

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
1.0k Posts 45 Posters 165.6k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Mazhar
    wrote on last edited by
    #686

    Only slanders. You have totally exposed yourself that you lack even basic knowledge of Arabic. How sentences are structured to put meanings in them is far beyond your brain. Sorry to note that you do not even know types of noun and still have self assumed to be a scholar on Qur'aan.

    http//haqeeqat.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.Arabic%20Text/004.%20An%20Nisa/4.11m.gif

    This sentence is beyond your comprehension. You see only words. Sentence is far more than sum total of words. Do you know what type of sentence is this? How many are grammatical units in it? What is its tone.

    If you know not these basic things avoid spreading your foolish ideas imagined.

    What is hampering to talk about the basic part of the discourse on inheritance. Are you clueless, or afraid that you whole story will fall.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • N Offline
      N Offline
      Noon_waalqalami
      wrote on last edited by
      #687

      summary "all cases" shares always equal exactly 1 and never over/under!

      411/4176 to the male (i.e. gender) similitude apportion the two/females
      applies if at least two females are present -- never with only one/female!

      https//i.postimg.cc/dQZ0cvL2/inheritance-4-11-and-4-176.jpg

      Cairo, National Library qaf 47 one of oldest manuscripts dated 606-652 CE (95.4%)
      https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/4/vers/12/handschrift/73

      ch4v11-12 translation https//i.postimg.cc/CxFGJC3s/ch4v11-15.jpg

      Berlin, State Library ms.or.fol. 4313 (same manuscript) dated 606-652 CE (95.4%)
      https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/4/vers/176/handschrift/73

      ch4v176 translation https//i.postimg.cc/SxwtPMV1/ch4v172-ch5v2.jpg

      https//i.postimg.cc/JzrV1jWp/inheritance1.jpg

      https//i.postimg.cc/tCzwm7VW/inheritance2.jpg

      13 years since joining this site, only 3 verses!

      peace all the best to everyone! peace

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Offline
        M Offline
        Mazhar
        wrote on last edited by
        #688

        Noon, can you move with me step by step. You are at liberty to accept or rebut by evidence NOT by gossip.

        Part-I. Definition of inheritance; Arabic Root for semantic domain of inheritance and Roots that collocate

        1. Inheritance is the practice of passing on the property, movable and immovable assets, debts and obligations upon the death of an individual. The concept of inheritance is embedded in Root . Ibn Faris stated

        ( &#1577

        . .

        That it refers to the thing owned by persons which thereafter is turned towards later generation by lineage/kinship and/or for some other reason.

        1. It thus denotes inheritance, transfer of sustenance to heirs called they who inherit (money, property, heritage) as an heir at the death of previous holder. They can be only those who are for the deceased plural noun (three or more) meaning kinsfolk, or beneficiaries for some other reason, like under patronage person (in common parlance adopted son). It stems from Root . According to Ibn Faris its primarily signification is

        .

        That it leads to the perception of nearness; adjacent.

        Dear can you deny these facts?

        If we proceed logically we can better revisit and evaluate the accuracy of what we have been understanding. Let us learn.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • The_SardarT Offline
          The_SardarT Offline
          The_Sardar
          wrote on last edited by
          #689

          summary "all cases" shares always equal exactly 1 and never over/under!

          411/4176 to the male (i.e. gender) similitude apportion the two/females
          applies if at least two females are present -- never with only one/female!

          https//i.postimg.cc/dQZ0cvL2/inheritance-4-11-and-4-176.jpg

          Cairo, National Library qaf 47 one of oldest manuscripts dated 606-652 CE (95.4%)
          https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/4/vers/12/handschrift/73

          ch4v11-12 translation https//i.postimg.cc/CxFGJC3s/ch4v11-15.jpg

          Berlin, State Library ms.or.fol. 4313 (same manuscript) dated 606-652 CE (95.4%)
          https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/4/vers/176/handschrift/73

          ch4v176 translation https//i.postimg.cc/SxwtPMV1/ch4v172-ch5v2.jpg

          https//i.postimg.cc/JzrV1jWp/inheritance1.jpg

          https//i.postimg.cc/tCzwm7VW/inheritance2.jpg

          13 years since joining this site, only 3 verses!

          peace all the best to everyone! peace

          Salam/Peace Noon, i hope that does not mean you are leaving or something? By the way, i agree with you on this Inheritance issues is due to Hadith involvement of translation.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • The_SardarT Offline
            The_SardarT Offline
            The_Sardar
            wrote on last edited by
            #690

            Also Noon, these link that uses mistranslation of 411-13 are used to be debunked? Because this thread is about debunking the mistranslation the verses that the mistranslation is due to hadith influence.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M Offline
              M Offline
              Mazhar
              wrote on last edited by
              #691

              Also Noon, these link that uses mistranslation of 411-13 are used to be debunked? Because this thread is about debunking the mistranslation the verses that the mistranslation is due to hadith influence.

              Elaborate. where is influence of hadith on translation.

              Give separate translations which you think is influenced by hadith.

              This hadith mockery is a fraudulent technique to mislead people.

              Come with explicit s/

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • The_SardarT Offline
                The_SardarT Offline
                The_Sardar
                wrote on last edited by
                #692

                Elaborate. where is influence of hadith on translation.

                Give separate translations which you think is influenced by hadith.

                This hadith mockery is a fraudulent technique to mislead people.

                Come with explicit s/

                I sadly don't remember which hadith it was but i think it was from Bukhari. Like i said i don't remember. Sorry if my answer is not good enough.

                EDIT It seems brother Noon did actually mentioned a Hadith in the first page https//sunnah.com/urn/239370

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M Offline
                  M Offline
                  Mazhar
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #693

                  What Noon is thinking as Inheritance that were the opinion of some that has noting relevant to words of Qur'an.

                  Qur'an nowhere allocates 1/3 of any denominator to a son. This is what Noon avoids to talk about. Qur'an allocates half of inheritance if there is only one female in Aulad.

                  Qur'an separates the deceased into three categories each exclusive from other.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • N Offline
                    N Offline
                    Noon_waalqalami
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #694

                    EDIT It seems brother Noon did actually mentioned a Hadith in the first page https//sunnah.com/urn/239370

                    peace, not only hadith -- horrid readings that lead to 100s of contradictions!
                    e.g. parents, 2 daughters contradiction! husband, 2 daughters contradiction!
                    ask any scholar in the world and they are clueless to allocate above correctly!

                    ch4v11 over two (3+) – cannot ever include two!
                    ch6v18 and he the subjugator over (not equal!) devotees his
                    ch4v176 exactly two – cannot ever be over two (3+)!

                    Dr. Mohamad Shahrour is the only scholar that came close
                    Rules of inheritance - Dr.Mohamad Shahrour (Episode.2)
                    https//www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFfvjAoRpIk

                    ch4v11 applies only when “mixed” children while single gender i.e. solitary son/s or daughter/s always variable get the remainder after parents and/or spouses; likewise, any sole heir always gets the whole e.g. parent, spouse, offspring/child (son/s, daughter/s), sibling (brother/s, sister/s), etc.

                    in "all cases" the shares always equal exactly 1 and never above/under!

                    Cairo, National Library qaf 47 one of oldest manuscripts dated 606-652 CE (95.4%)
                    https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/4/vers/12/handschrift/73
                    ch4v11-12 translation https//i.postimg.cc/CxFGJC3s/ch4v11-15.jpg

                    Berlin, State Library ms.or.fol. 4313 (same manuscript) dated 606-652 CE (95.4%)
                    https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/4/vers/176/handschrift/73
                    ch4v176 translation https//i.postimg.cc/SxwtPMV1/ch4v172-ch5v2.jpg

                    children & siblings https//i.postimg.cc/dQZ0cvL2/inheritance-4-11-and-4-176.jpg
                    children & parents, kalala https//i.postimg.cc/JzrV1jWp/inheritance1.jpg
                    children & spouses https//i.postimg.cc/tCzwm7VW/inheritance2.jpg

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • M Offline
                      M Offline
                      Mazhar
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #695

                      ch4v11 applies only when “mixed” children while single gender i.e. solitary son/s or daughter/s always variable get the remainder after parents and/or spouses; likewise, any sole heir always gets the whole e.g. parent, spouse, offspring/child (son/s, daughter/s), sibling (brother/s, sister/s), etc.

                      What a stupid resolution?

                      And if she (your offspring) was one female; then, one-half is allocated for her.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • N Offline
                        N Offline
                        Noon_waalqalami
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #696

                        ^^^ still spamming has not figured out to allocate parents, spouse, daughter/s nope

                        Rules of inheritance - Dr.Mohamad Shahrour (Episode.2)
                        https//www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFfvjAoRpIk

                        video made me think of one unresolved question
                        certain mixed gender children/siblings with 1 male

                        females multi ratio f/m distributions given 1 male

                        1 daughter 1.0x 11 1,1 1/2, 1/2 ... 411 and if be she one (daughter) so for her the half (1/2)
                        2 daughters 2.0x 12 2,1 1/4, 1/4, 1/2 ... 411 to the male similitude apportion the two females
                        3 daughters 1.5x 23 3,1 2/9, 2/9, 2/9, 1/3 ... 411 so if are womenfolk over two (3+) so for them third dual (2/3)
                        4 daughters 2.0x 12 4,1 1/6, 1/6, 1/6, 1/6, 1/3
                        5 daughters 2.5x 25 5,1 2/15, 2/15, 2/15, 2/15, 2/15, 1/3
                        6 daughters 3.0x 13 6,1 1/9, 1/9, 1/9, 1/9, 1/9, 1/9, 1/3

                        1 sister 1.0x 11 1,1 1/2, 1/2 ... 4176 and to him (said person) sister so for her half (1/2)
                        2 sisters 1.0x 11 2,1 1/3, 1/3, 1/3 ... 4176 so if be dual two females so to them dual the third each (2/3)
                        3 sisters 2.0x 12 3,1 1/5, 1/5, 1/5, 2/5 ... 4176 so to the male similitude apportion the two females
                        4 sisters 2.0x 12 4,1 1/6, 1/6, 1/6, 1/6, 1/3
                        5 sisters 2.0x 12 5,1 1/7, 1/7, 1/7, 1/7, 1/7, 2/7
                        6 sisters 2.0x 12 6,1 1/8, 1/8, 1/8, 1/8, 1/8, 1/8, 1/4

                        the question is do above same ratios apply adding more males?
                        e.g. 1 daughter/sister share equally with any # of sons/brothers?
                        OR 1 daughter/sister 1/2, 6 sons/brothers 1/2 (1/12 each?)

                        2 sisters 1/4 (1/8 each), 6 brothers 3/4 (1/8 each)
                        OR
                        2 sisters 2/3 (1/3 each), 6 brothers 1/3 (1/18 each?)

                        logically the same ratios given do hold when adding more males!

                        peace!

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • M Offline
                          M Offline
                          Mazhar
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #697

                          What a stupid resolution?

                          And if she (your offspring) was one female; then, one-half is allocated for her.

                          Just forget superfluous distribution. Do you accept this command or you reject it?

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • N Offline
                            N Offline
                            Noon_waalqalami
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #698

                            ^^^ 411 where is the instruction what to give 2 solitary daughters, no sons?
                            4176 where is the instruction what to give 3+ solitary sisters, no brothers?

                            simple questions he repeatedly refuses to answer continues spamming!
                            exactly same instructions solitary boys/girls, can only have 1 variable!

                            1/3 parents (fixed 1/6 each), 2/3 two sons (variable 1/3 each)
                            1/3 parents (fixed 1/6 each), 2/3 two daughters (variable 1/3 each)

                            the instruction set mixed children ratio fm is given
                            411 instructed you the god in offspring yours
                            (case 2 females!) to the male similitude apportion the two females
                            (case 3+ females!) so if are womenfolk over two females so for them 2/3
                            (case 1 female!) and if be she one so for her the half (1/2)

                            this is like teaching preschool children with attention deficit disorder symptoms.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • M Offline
                              M Offline
                              Mazhar
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #699

                              What a stupid resolution?

                              And if she (your offspring) was one female; then, one-half is allocated for her.

                              1= 24 equal parts.

                              According to this sentence of Ayah half went to one female (daughter-Noon calls it walad=child)= 12 parts

                              Take note; One-sixth of that which he (the deceased son) has left behind is allocated separately for each of his bereaved Father and Mother. This direction is to take effect if solitary child is surviving for him (the deceased).

                              One sixth to father = 4 parts
                              one sixth to mother=4 parts.

                              20 parts went.

                              However, in case there was child (according to Noon) to grieve for you, thereby, the one-eighth is apportioned for them (bereaved wives) out of that which you have left.

                              She gets- 3 parts.

                              Total 23.

                              To whom will go remaining part 1 and where is its mention dear Noon?

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • N Offline
                                N Offline
                                Noon_waalqalami
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #700

                                ^^^ clueless rant hijacking the thread with continuous spamming!
                                411 daughter 1/2 children mixed i.e. son/s present not solitary.
                                again mazhar simply allocate father daughter?
                                otherwise stop hijacking the thread!

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • M Offline
                                  M Offline
                                  Mazhar
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #701

                                  ^^^ clueless rant hijacking the thread with continuous spamming!
                                  411 daughter 1/2 children mixed i.e. son/s present not solitary.
                                  again mazhar simply allocate father daughter?
                                  otherwise stop hijacking the thread!

                                  Sentences of Ayah quoted are simple and specific. It is specifically mentioned if there was one child half will go to child.

                                  Simply answer the post. I know you have gone clueless.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • N Offline
                                    N Offline
                                    Noon_waalqalami
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #702

                                    Sentences of Ayah quoted are simple and specific. It is specifically mentioned if there was one child half will go to child.

                                    no read in context it is a loop gives ratios femalesmale nicely explained in video
                                    Rules of inheritance - Dr.Mohamad Shahrour (Episode.2)
                                    https//www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFfvjAoRpIk

                                    otherwise have 100s of contradictions in distributions e.g. parents daughter?

                                    https//i.postimg.cc/Hn9QCBmQ/inheritance-4-11-and-4-176.jpg

                                    females multi ratio f,m distributions given 1 male

                                    1 daughter 1.0x 11 1,1 1/2, 1/2 ... 411 and if be she one (daughter) so for her the half (1/2)
                                    2 daughters 2.0x 12 2,1 1/4, 1/4, 1/2 ... 411 to the male similitude apportion the two females
                                    3 daughters 1.5x 23 3,1 2/9, 2/9, 2/9, 1/3 ... 411 so if are womenfolk over two (3+) so for them third dual (2/3)
                                    4 daughters 2.0x 12 4,1 1/6, 1/6, 1/6, 1/6, 1/3
                                    5 daughters 2.5x 25 5,1 2/15, 2/15, 2/15, 2/15, 2/15, 1/3
                                    6 daughters 3.0x 13 6,1 1/9, 1/9, 1/9, 1/9, 1/9, 1/9, 1/3

                                    females multi ratio f,m distributions given 1 male

                                    1 sister 1.0x 11 1,1 1/2, 1/2 ... 4176 and to him (said person) sister so for her half (1/2)
                                    2 sisters 1.0x 11 2,1 1/3, 1/3, 1/3 ... 4176 so if be dual two females so to them dual the third each (2/3)
                                    3 sisters 2.0x 12 3,1 1/5, 1/5, 1/5, 2/5 ... 4176 so to the male similitude apportion the two females
                                    4 sisters 2.0x 12 4,1 1/6, 1/6, 1/6, 1/6, 1/3
                                    5 sisters 2.0x 12 5,1 1/7, 1/7, 1/7, 1/7, 1/7, 2/7
                                    6 sisters 2.0x 12 6,1 1/8, 1/8, 1/8, 1/8, 1/8, 1/8, 1/4

                                    above same ratios apply when adding more males
                                    e.g. 1 daughter shares equally with any # of sons
                                    e.g. 1 or 2 sisters share equally any # of brothers

                                    4176 shows the god for you lest thou err ye of and the god in every thing knower

                                    peace!

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • M Offline
                                      M Offline
                                      Mazhar
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #703

                                      My dear why are you so evasive. Your plan flops when we come to specifics.

                                      One female gets half of the inheritance. How can you deny the words of Allah and insert your own imagination. There is no mention that with one girl there is one boy also.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • N Offline
                                        N Offline
                                        Noon_waalqalami
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #704

                                        you cannot read in context, attributed daughters to god, cannot allocate anything.
                                        open your own thread show how to allocate all combinations without contradiction.
                                        see small sample below then do same husband, daughters, sons, sisters, brothers.

                                        daughter,son,wife,mother,father

                                        daughter,son,wife,mother
                                        daughter,son,wife,father
                                        daughter,son,mother,father
                                        daughter,wife,mother,father
                                        son,wife,mother,father

                                        daughter,son,wife
                                        daughter,son,mother
                                        daughter,son,father
                                        daughter,wife,mother
                                        daughter,wife,father
                                        daughter,mother,father
                                        son,wife,mother
                                        son,wife,father
                                        son,mother,father
                                        wife,mother,father

                                        daughter,son
                                        daughter,wife
                                        daughter,mother
                                        daughter,father
                                        son,wife
                                        son,mother
                                        son,father
                                        wife,mother
                                        wife,father
                                        mother,father

                                        kalala cases
                                        mother,father,sister,brother

                                        mother,father,sister
                                        mother,father,brother
                                        mother,sister,brother
                                        father,sister,brother

                                        mother,sister
                                        mother,brother
                                        father,sister
                                        father,brother
                                        sister,brother

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • The_SardarT Offline
                                          The_SardarT Offline
                                          The_Sardar
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #705

                                          Error in my mistake, accidentally posted a quote from Noon.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users