Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. Was Jesus Created...?

Was Jesus Created...?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
59 Posts 8 Posters 362 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • U Offline
    U Offline
    unknownuser
    wrote on last edited by
    #38

    Apple Pie,

    Lets refocus your mind

    Your core argument which you failed to prove

    Quote
    1-)Amazingly?not only does the classic Arabic tell us that Jesus is the equivalent or similitude ?Mathalu? of ?allah??

    2-)but we are also told that Jesus is present with ?allah??as ?allah? is not alone?!

    Here is what I am not satisfied with your argument.

    • Which particular definition you are picking and why?
    • You have not given a transliteration of 459.
    • You have not shown how the order of words work to produce your understanding.
    • You have not validated your claim through the Quran to show you did not make a mistake.

    Anyone can see for themselves what part of the arguments are complete and which aren't.

    It is obvious to anyone that your interpretation can not be validated by the quran, your only hope is to pick shades of meanings that can be inferred from a whole host of definitions. Perhaps this is why you did not provide a translation of 359.

    When you are answering please make sure you cover all the points and cut out the verbage that comes with it...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • U Offline
      U Offline
      unknownuser
      wrote on last edited by
      #39

      Greetings All,

      Let us now consider the second half comparison of 3.59, which begins with the word ?kamathali??

      Inna mathala AAeesa AAinda Allahi kamathali adama khalaqahu min turabin thumma qala lahu kun fayakoonu

      Defining the word?

      = ?ka?

      ?ka? definition

      When prefixed to a noun is called ?ka? of comparison. A particle prefixed to nouns, and to other particles, and meaning ?as? or ?like?. It is a formally undeveloped noun, which occurs only as the governing word in the genitive connection, but runs in this position through all the relations of case (similitude, instar). Like, like that, so, similarly, likewise, even so, so shall it be, so the fact is.

      When prefixed to the noun the latter is redundant, as in 2.261

      Mathalu allatheena yunfiqoona amwalahum fee sabeeli Allahi kamathali habbatin anbatat sabAAa sanabila fee kulli sunbulatin mi-atu habbatin waAllahu yudaAAifu liman yashao waAllahu wasiAAun AAaleemun

      2.261 (The) resemblance (of) those who spend their properties/wealth in Allah's way/sake (is) as/like (the) resemblance of a seed/grain (that) sprouted/grew seven ears/spikes, in every ear/spike (are) one hundred grain(s)/seed(s), and Allah doubles/multiplies for whom He wills/wants, and Allah (is) rich/abundant, knowledgeable.

      References
      An Arabic-English Lexicon, E.W. Lane, volume eight, p. 2998
      A Grammar of the Arabic Language, W. Wright, Third edition, volume 1, p. 280
      The Dictionary of the Holy Qur?an, 1st edition, Abdul Mannan Omar pp. 475
      A Dictionary and Glossary of the Koran, John Penrice, pp. 122 - 123

      Reviewing ?mathalu? once more?

      = ?mathalu?

      ?mathalu? definition

      Noun. Parable, likeness, similitude, like, reason, proverb, discourse, equivalent, comparison, sign, lesson, an example, case, state, condition, argument, match, an analogue. It comes from the root ?mathala?, which means to resemble, imitate, compare any one with, be or look like some one, bear a likeness.

      References
      An Arabic-English Lexicon, E.W. Lane, volume eight, pp. 3017 - 3018
      The Dictionary of the Holy Qur?an, 1st edition, Abdul Mannan Omar pp. 525 - 526

      = ?ka? + ?mathali? = ?kamathali? = as/like

      Occurrences of ?kamathali? in the Koran 13
      Locations 2.17, 2.171, 2.261, 2.264, 2.265, 3.59, 3.117, 7.176, 29.41, 57.20, 59.15, 59.16, 62.5

      Thus, as we can see for ourselves, that the defining of our terms is absolutely critical to the proper understanding of the ayah in question.

      There are two comparisons taking place in 3.59; the latter comparison is redundant to the former.

      This is per the classic Arabic definition.

      Period.

      Not the other way around as Muslims would like it to be.

      This then, forces Adam?s comparison to be likened to the comparison of Jesus to ?allah?.

      So...the burning question is what is redundant about Adams? comparison to that of Jesus? comparison?

      Let?s review more terminology?

      The second (and redundant) comparison involves the creation of Adam.

      The first term utilized is ?

      = ?khalaqa?

      ?khalaqa? definition

      Masculine singular. He created, determined. Anything made smooth; signifying the being smooth, as such also in a rock, freedom from crack or fracture, and, as such, the being old and worn out, hence used as an epithet, old and worn out. It comes from the root ?khalaqa?, which means the act of measuring; or determining the measure, proportion, or the like, of a thing; and the making a thing by measure, or according to the measure of another thing; or proportioning a thing to another thing. It signifies the bringing of a thing into existence according to a certain measure, or proportion, and so as to make it equal to another thing, or uniform therewith; or the originating or producing a thing after a pattern or model which one has devised, not after the similitude of anything pre-existing. As an act of God, it signifies the originating or bringing into being or existence anything not after the similitude of anything pre-existing; and the creating a thing; and thus it is generally best rendered; as meaning the bringing into existence from a state of no-existence. As an act of God, signifies the creating out of nothing. To measure, proportion, determine, fashion, create, form a thing, be fir, apt to a thing, behave kindly.

      References
      An Arabic-English Lexicon, E.W. Lane, volume two, pp. 799 - 803
      The Dictionary of the Holy Qur?an, 1st edition, Abdul Mannan Omar pp. 163 - 164

      = ?hu?

      ?hu? definition

      An indeclinable affixed personal or possessive pronoun of third person singular masculine; when affixed to a verb or preposition as a person pronoun, it means him or it; and when to a noun as a possessive, his or it. Singular personal or possessive pronoun. Him. Verbal suffix which expresses the accusative.

      References
      A Grammar of the Arabic Language, W. Wright, Third edition, volume 1, p. 100
      A Dictionary and Glossary of the Koran, John Penrice, p. 152

      = ?khalaqa? + ?hu? = ?khalaqahu? = He created him

      Occurrences of ?khalaqahu? in the Koran 6
      Locations 3.59, 20.50, 32.7, 36.78, 80.18, 80.19

      Observe that in all instances of the Koranic usage of ?khalaqahu?
      ? It is referring to man?not to Jesus
      ? It is singular
      ? It refers to the act of measuring; or determining the measure, proportion, or the like, of a thing; and the making a thing by measure, or according to the measure of another thing; or proportioning a thing to another thing
      ? The originating or producing a thing after a pattern or model which one has devised, not after the similitude of anything pre-existing.
      ? As meaning the bringing into existence from a state of no-existence. As an act of God, signifies the creating out of nothing

      Thus?we are told that Adam was created, i.e. he had a beginning (out of nothing), in the likeness of his creator.

      That Adam had a starting point, is confirmed by the next word?

      = ?min?

      ?min? definition

      A preposition signifying origin, composition, explanation, commencement, or separation; in its ordinary acceptation, it is equivalent to of, from, or out of; or, when following a comparative, than; but it occasionally may be rendered on, by, by reason of, some or a portion of, of the same kind as, after the manner of, etc. Used for expressing a starting point, part of a whole, origin as, from, of some amongst, of, from, on account of,

      References
      A Grammar of the Arabic Language, W. Wright, Third edition, volume 1, p. 280 - 282
      The Dictionary of the Holy Qur?an, 1st edition, Abdul Mannan Omar, p. 542
      A Dictionary and Glossary of the Koran, John Penrice, pp. 140 - 141

      Next, we are told that Adams? nothingness starting point was from dust?

      = ?turabin?

      ?turabin? definition

      Noun. Dust and earth generally the former; i.e. fine, dry, particles of earth. It comes from the root ?tariba?, which means it (a thing) became dusted, or dusty; dust lighted upon it; it (a place) had much dust or earth; abounded with dust or earth. He (a man) had dust, or earth, in his hand; he clave to the dust or earth; or he clave to the dust or earth, by reason of poverty; he became so poor that he clave to the dust, or earth; and he suffered loss and became poor so that he clave to the dust, or earth; to have much earth, be full of earth, have dust in his hands, be destitute.

      References
      An Arabic-English Lexicon, E.W. Lane, volume one, pp. 300 - 301
      The Dictionary of the Holy Qur?an, 1st edition, Abdul Mannan Omar, p. 74
      A Dictionary and Glossary of the Koran, John Penrice, p. 22

      Occurrences of ?turabin? in the Koran 7
      Locations 2.264, 3.59, 18.37, 22.5, 30.20, 35.11, 40.67

      Occurrences of the root ?tariba? and its 4 forms in the Koran 22
      Locations 2.264, 3.59, 13.5, 16.59, 18.37, 22.5, 23.35, 23.82, 26.67, 30.20, 35.11, 37.16, 37.53, 38.52, 40.67, 50.3, 56.37, 56.47, 78.33, 78.40, 86.7, 90.16

      Reading each Koranic occurrence, in context, shows that the root, and all derivatives of the root, refers directly to a Resurrection event.

      Worthy of honorable mention is the creation of man as demonstrated in sura 86?which shares the same root as ?turabin? used in 3.59?

      Observe the same ?creation? of man similarities in these passages of sura 86?

      86?

      .5 So, in order to inform mankind from ?khuliqa? that which originated the inner man.

      .6 The inner man originated ?khuliqa? from water pouring/jetting/flowing forcefully.

      .7 He comes forth from between the backbone/loins/spine and the ?ttara-ibi? breast bone/rib bones?.from the root ?tariba?!

      .8 When His (is) upon/near/above He returned/was brought back the one who has power over.

      Since we are already cognizant of the fact that sura 86 is about Jesus and the ?creation? of man through His Crucifixion, Death, and Resurrection?we can thus be confident that 3.59 is also demonstrating this very same thought process?

      Man was created through Jesus?

      Our next word denotes a sequence?

      = ?thumma?

      ?thumma? definition

      Then; i.e. afterward, or afterwards, a particle, or conjunction denoting order and delay; mostly used as a conjunction indicating a sequence in line or order to be rendered as then; thereafter; thereupon. It comes from the root ?thamma?, which means he repaired it, or put it into a good, sound, or right, state; to pick up, collect, repair, heap up (things in a place). He collected it together; namely a thing.

      References
      An Arabic-English Lexicon, E.W. Lane, volume one, pp. 350 - 352
      The Dictionary of the Holy Qur?an, 1st edition, Abdul Mannan Omar p. 84

      = ?qala?

      ?qala? definition

      Masculine singular. Said. It comes from the root ?qala?, which means He said, or a word signifying at least one complete proposition; or a word signifying a command or the like; or a word significant of a sound; to speak, say, inspire, profess, grasp, point cut, relate, emit an opinion upon, think, answer, reply, transmit, indicate a condition state or circumstance. It is also used to describe the upshot of events without there being actual speech or dialogue.

      References
      An Arabic-English Lexicon, E.W. Lane, volume eight, pp. 2994 - 2995
      The Dictionary of the Holy Qur?an, 1st edition, Abdul Mannan Omar pp. 469 - 471

      Thus, we are informed of the creation sequence of Adam

      ? From nothing
      ? Then dust
      ? Then the Word

      Finally, the Word of ?allah? is shown to have the power to bring into existence that which never existed?

      = ?kun?

      ?kun? definition

      Masculine singular. Be thou. It comes from the root ?kana?, which means he, or it, was; to be, exist, happen, occur, take place, become, be such or so. A verb of the class called incomplete, because, with the agent that it comprises, or to which it relates, it cannot constitute a complete preposition; i.e. non-attributive. It governs its noun, or subject, in the nominative case, and it?s enunciative, or predicate, in the acc. case. Divested of all signification of time, is often used as a copula. As a complete, i.e., attributive verb.

      References
      An Arabic-English Lexicon, E.W. Lane, volume eight, p. 3004
      The Dictionary of the Holy Qur?an, 1st edition, Abdul Mannan Omar, pp. 500 ? 502
      A Dictionary and Glossary of the Koran, John Penrice, pp. 128 - 129

      = ?yakoonu?

      ?yakoonu? definition

      Masculine singular. Is. It comes from the root ?kana?, which means he, or it, was; to be, exist, happen, occur, take place, become, be such or so. A verb of the class called incomplete, because, with the agent that it comprises, or to which it relates, it cannot constitute a complete preposition; i.e. non-attributive. It governs its noun, or subject, in the nominative case, and it?s enunciative, or predicate, in the acc. case. Divested of all signification of time, is often used as a copula. As a complete, i.e., attributive verb.

      References
      An Arabic-English Lexicon, E.W. Lane, volume eight, p. 3004
      The Dictionary of the Holy Qur?an, 1st edition, Abdul Mannan Omar, pp. 500 ? 502
      A Dictionary and Glossary of the Koran, John Penrice, pp. 128 - 129

      = ?fa? + ?yakoonu? = ?fayakoonu?

      Occurrences of ?fayakoonu? in the Koran 10
      Locations 2.117, 3.47, 3.49, 3.59, 6.73, 16.40, 19.35, 25.7, 36.82, 40.68

      The power of the Word.

      We already know that the Koran proclaims Jesus as the Word?4.171?

      Where have we hear this before??

      Let?s look to the Holy Bible?

      Joh 11 In1722 the beginning746 was2258 the3588 Word,3056 and2532 the3588 Word3056 was2258 with4314 God,2316 and2532 the3588 Word3056 was2258 God.2316
      Joh 12 The same3778 was2258 in1722 the beginning746 with4314 God.2316
      Joh 13 All things3956 were made1096 by1223 Him;846 and2532 without5565 Him846 was not3761 any thing1520 made1096 that3739 was made.1096
      Joh 14 In1722 Him846 was2258 life;2222 and2532 the3588 life2222 was2258 the3588 light5457 of men.444

      John tells us this

      ? The Word was in the beginning
      ? The Word was with God
      ? The Word was God
      ? All things were made by the Word
      ? In the Word was every living soul #G2222 ?zoe?

      Joh 19 That was2258 the3588 true228 Light,5457 which3739 lighteth5461 every3956 man444 that cometh2064 into1519 the3588 world.2889
      Joh 110 He was2258 in1722 the3588 world,2889 and2532 the3588 world2889 was made1096 by1223 him,846 and2532 the3588 world2889 knew1097 him846 not.3756
      Joh 111 He came2064 unto1519 his own,2398 and2532 his own2398 received3880 him846 not.3756

      John tells us this

      ? The Word was in the Universe
      ? The Universe came into existence through the Word

      Joh 114 And2532 the3588 Word3056 was made1096 flesh,4561 and2532 dwelt4637 among1722 us,2254 (and2532 we beheld2300 his846 glory,1391 the glory1391 as5613 of the only begotten3439 of3844 the Father,)3962 full4134 of grace5485 and2532 truth.225

      John tells us this

      ? The Word became flesh
      ? The Word is Jesus Christ

      Thus?.it is quite clear from the above that the Word is Jesus?.and that Jesus brought into existence the entire physical Universe including the flesh of which He manifested His earthly tenure?

      Pulling together all that we have learned regarding this ayah?

      Thus?the outward rendering of 3.59?

      3.59 Certainly Jesus' similitude present with allah; as/like Adam, He created him out of dust then said to him "Be thou." so (he) is.

      The message behind the rendering

      ? Two comparisons are made ?mathalu? & ?kamathali?
      ? The first (former) comparison is between Jesus and ?allah?
      ? Jesus is shown to be co-equal ?mathalu? with ?allah?
      ? Jesus is shown to have always existed ?inna? with ?inda? ?allah?
      ? Jesus was not created
      ? The second (latter) comparison is redundant to the former
      ? The second comparison describes the creation ?khalaqahu? of Adam
      ? It is referring to man?not to Jesus
      ? It is singular
      ? It refers to the act of measuring; or determining the measure, proportion, or the like, of a thing; and the making a thing by measure, or according to the measure of another thing; or proportioning a thing to another thing
      ? The originating or producing a thing after a pattern or model which one has devised, not after the similitude of anything pre-existing.
      ? As meaning the bringing into existence from a state of no-existence. As an act of God, signifies the creating out of nothing
      ? We are told that Adam was created, i.e. he had a beginning (out of nothing), in the likeness of his creator
      ? Adam is made from dust ??turabin?
      ? The creation of man in this ayah is rooted in sura 86?which shares the same root as ?turabin?
      ? The Word of ?allah? brings forth Adam
      ? The Word i.e. Jesus is co-equal with ?allah?
      ? Man is created through Jesus
      ? Jesus is God

      Thus?it becomes quite clear that the second comparison of this ayah is simply re-enforcing the Biblical stance that Jesus (the Word) is what brought Adam into existence out of nothing.

      Take care?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • J Offline
        J Offline
        Jafar
        wrote on last edited by
        #40

        Salaam

        ApplePie, you and all christians who regards Jesus (as) as God or one of Gods should put more deep thinking on your position. (Before it is too late).

        On their "Daven" / "Shalat" in the synagogue the jews proclaims these words. (Commonly known as "SHEMA")
        YHVH ELOHEYNU YHVH ECHAD
        YHVH Our God YHVH ONE (Deu 64)
        They substitue the word YHVH with ADONAI

        By reading in your bible, it is said that Jesus (as) do "Daven" in the "Kenisah/Synagogue". (Ref Luk 416, Mat 423, 935, Mar 62) and he sometimes / usually earn an honorable privilege to be an "Aliyah" (The one leading a prayer and/or reciting verses from the Tanakh).

        Then answer this

        While Jesus (as) doing the "Daven" in "Kenisah/Synagogue", where the SHEMA are always proclaimed as part of the "Jewish Liturgy". What do you think Jesus (as) said when the SHEMA are being proclaimed altogether?

        Is it

        a. YHVH Eloheynu YHVH Echad - YHVH Our God YHVH One
        (The correct shema, Deu 64)
        or
        b. Ani Eloheychem Ani Echad - I am your God I am One
        c. Ani Eloheychem Ani Shelosha Hayah Echad
        I am your God I am Three become One
        c. Ani Eloheychem Ani Echad Mishelosha
        I am your God I am one of the Three
        d. Keep silent

        Read Mark 1229 and READ WITH YOUR OWN EYES HOW JESUS (AS) PROCLAIM HIS SHEMA.

        Here's some links on how "the jews" do their "worshipping" in the time of Jesus (as).
        http//community.gospelcom.net/Brix?pageID=1633
        http//community.gospelcom.net/Brix?pageID=1637
        http//community.gospelcom.net/Brix?pageID=3399

        And here's some verses in your own bible about the 'impossibility' of God becoming a man or a man becoming a God.

        Isaiah 428
        ANI YHVH HVU SHEMY VKHEVODIRY LEACHER LO-ETEN VTEHILATY LAPSILIM
        I am YHVH, that is My name; and My glory will I not give to another, neither My praise to graven images.

        Hosea 119
        KI EL ANOKHI VE LO-ISH
        Because I am GOD and not a man

        To moslems, feel free to use the above argument as a means of your "dakwah" to our christian brothers and sisters.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • N Offline
          N Offline
          neo
          wrote on last edited by
          #41

          Greetings All,

          Thanks for your replies?

          Let?s concentrate on the most popular Koranic ?proof-text? used in the ?creation? controversy of Jesus?

          3.59?

          Inna mathala AAeesa AAinda Allahi kamathali adama khalaqahu min turabin thumma qala lahu kun fayakoonu

          Our position is thus?

          Jesus was not created.

          Furthermore?Jesus is co-equal with God.

          3.59 amply demonstrates these points?

          Let?s look?

          The authors?, who penned the Muslim book of faith, first used the following Arabic term when comparing Jesus to ?allah??

          = ?Mathalu?

          ?Mathalu? definition

          Noun. Parable, likeness, similitude, like, reason, proverb, discourse, equivalent, comparison, sign, lesson, an example, case, state, condition, argument, match, an analogue. It comes from the root ?mathala?, which means to resemble, imitate, compare any one with, be or look like some one, bear a likeness.

          References
          An Arabic-English Lexicon, E.W. Lane, volume eight, pp. 3017 - 3018
          The Dictionary of the Holy Qur?an, 1st edition, Abdul Mannan Omar pp. 525 - 526

          Already?we can clearly see the comparison of Jesus to ?allah? is one of

          ? Similitude
          ? Equivalent
          ? Analogue
          ? Resemble
          ? Bear a likeness

          Now?look at the next Arabic term used when comparing Jesus to ?allah??

          = ?inda?

          ?inda? definition

          A particle used as a preposition to denote time and place. The vicinage, or the quarter, tract, region, or place, of a person or thing. Used in the manner pf a preposition, though properly a prefixed noun signifying a place (or anything local); of time when prefixed to a noun signifying a time denoting presence, i.e. perceptible presence, and also ideal presence, or rather the place of presence; and nearness, or the place of nearness; or the utmost nearness, and therefore it has no dim.; i.e. it is primarily used in relation to that which is present with a person (or thing), in any adjacent part or quarter with respect to that person (or thing); or in relation to that which is near to a person (or thing); thus is signifies at, near, nigh, by, near by, or close by, a place, or thing; with, present with, or in the presence of, a person or persons, or a thing or things; at the abode of a person; at the place of , or in the region of, a thing; or among , or amongst, persons or things and at, near, nigh, or about, a time; and at, or on, or upon, denoting the occasion of an event or an action; here; with; by; at the point of; about; from; in the presence of. The word denotes the idea of nearness, it also denotes a sense of rank or dignity or opinion, time and place.

          is generally best rendered in the estimation, or sight of Allah. Sometimes it denotes comparison. Not alone.

          References
          An Arabic-English Lexicon, E.W. Lane, volume five, pp. 2170 - 2172
          The Dictionary of the Holy Qur?an, 1st edition, Abdul Mannan Omar p. 391

          Amazingly?not only does the classic Arabic tell us that Jesus is the equivalent or similitude ?Mathalu? of ?allah??but we are also told that Jesus is present with ?allah??as ?allah? is not alone?!

          The blatant fact that ?allah? is not alone is confirmed elsewhere in your book of faith, as demonstrated in this grouping?

          Innahu laqawlu rasoolin kareemin

          81.19 That he truly is a Holy messenger's Word.

          Occurrences of ?laqawlun? in the Koran 3
          Locations 69.40, 81.19, 86.13

          We already know that sura 86 is discussing Jesus?.and that Jesus is the WORD spoken of in 86.13?

          Then?

          Thee quwwatin AAinda thee alAAarshi makeenin

          81.20 Of power at of the throne highly positioned/distinguished.

          Here we are informed that ?the Holy messengers Word? i.e. Jesus, is ?inda??or present at the throne.

          Furthermore?we are told that Jesus is ?quwwatin? at the throne?.i.e. singular; meaning ?and separately twisted portion of two or more which, being twisted together, compose the whole of a rope, and of a string, or thread?

          Interestingly?.the authors? of the Koran make the special point of illustrating that two things are ?twisted? together to make one?!

          Then?

          MutaAAin thamma ameenin

          81.21 Obeyed there at the same time or place, faithful/loyal.

          Absolutely amazing?..the ?two? that are actually ?one? are now to be ?mutaAAin??i.e. ?Obeyed one; who is entitled to be obeyed?

          Thus?.it is crystal clear that Jesus is God Almighty.

          Straight from the Muslim book of faith, as penned by its? authors?

          Comments thus far?.?

          Lol.

          "The similitude of Jesus before Allah is as that of Adam; He created him from dust, then said to him "Be". And he was."

          If you can take that to mean "Jesus is like Allah and Allah is not alone" xfiles music then a forum can't help you; I'd suggest some serious secondary school English education.

          "The simplitude of Jesus before Allah is as that of Adam" means "In Allah's 'eyes' Jesus is like Adam". Wow. That was what, one sentence?

          As for your argument with 'similtitude' - Jesus was being compared to Adam, not Allah ("is as that of Adam").

          As for 'in the presence of' - it means 'to Allah', not "OMG HE WAS WITH ALLAH THAT MEANS ALLAH ISNT ONE LOLZ ".

          Your argument, is thus, broken.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • U Offline
            U Offline
            unknownuser
            wrote on last edited by
            #42

            Let?s define our terms first?

            , , .

            Shama? Yisra?el Yahweh Elohim Yahweh Echad

            Deu 64 Hear,8085 O Israel3478 Yahweh3068 our God430 Yahweh3068 (is)one259

            = ?Yahweh?

            ?Yahweh? definition

            H3068 Singular noun. The Tetragrammaton YHWH, the Lord, or Yahweh, the personal name of God and His most frequent designation in scripture, occurring 5321x. The word refers to the proper name of the God of Israel, particularly the name by which He revealed Himself to Moses (Ex 6.2-3). It comes from the root ?hawa? H1961, which means either existence, or development; ?to be?. ?The existing one?.

            H1961 ?hawa? A primitive root (compare H1933); to exist, that is, be or become, come to pass (always emphatic, and not a mere copula or auxiliary) - beacon, X altogether, be (-come, accomplished, committed, like), break, cause, come (to pass), continue, do, faint, fall, + follow, happen, X have, last, pertain, quit (one-) self, require, X use.

            H1933 ?havah? A primitive root supposed to mean properly to breathe; to be (in the sense of existence) - be, X have.

            References
            Theological Dictionary of the New Testament (TDNT), Gerhard Kittel, Gerhard Friedrich, & Geoffrey W. Bromiley, volume three, pp. 1067 - 1081
            Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament (TWOT) #484a, Harris, Archer, Waltke, volume 1, pp. 210 ? 212
            The Complete Wordstudy Dictionary of the Old Testament, Warren Baker, Eugene Carpenter, p. 426

            , , .

            = ?Elohim?

            ?Elohim? definition

            H430 A masculine plural noun. God, gods, judges, angels. This is not a ?Plural of Majesty?. A better reason can be seen in scripture itself where, in the very first chapter of Genesis, the necessity of a term conveying both the unity of the one God and yet allowing for a plurality of persons is found (Gen 1.2, 26). This is further borne out by the fact that the form ?Elohim? occurs only in Hebrew and in no other Semitic language, not even in Biblical Aramaic. Plural of H433; gods in the ordinary sense; but specifically used (in the plural thus, especially with the article) of the supreme God; occasionally applied by way of deference to magistrates; and sometimes as a superlative - angels, X exceeding, God (gods) (-dess, -ly), X (very) great, judges, X mighty.

            H433 ?eloah? Masculine singular noun. God or god. From H410; a deity or the deity - God, god. See H430.

            References
            Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament (TWOT) #93c, Harris, Archer, Waltke, volume 1, pp. 41 - 45
            The Complete Wordstudy Dictionary of the Old Testament, Warren Baker, Eugene Carpenter, p. 54
            The New Strong?s Expanded Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible Red-letter Edition, James Strong, LL.D., S.T.D., Hebrew and Aramaic dictionary, p. 17

            , , .

            = ?echad?

            ?echad? definition

            H259 Adjective. One, same, single, first, each, once. It is closely identified with ?yahad?, to be united and with ?ro?sh?, first, head. It stresses unity while recognizing diversity within that oneness. A numerical adjective meaning one, first, once, the same. A numeral from H258; properly united, that is, one; or (as an ordinal) first - a, alike, alone, altogether, and, any (-thing), apiece, a certain ly, each (one), + eleven, every, few, first, + highway, a man, once, one, only, other, some, together. One (number), each, every, a certain, an (indefinite article), only, once, once for all, one...another, the one...the other, one after another, one by one, first, eleven (in combination), eleventh (ordinal).

            H258 ?achad? Verb. Perhaps a primitive root; to unify, that is, (figuratively) collect (one?s thoughts) - go one way or other; be sharp, keen.

            References
            Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament (TWOT) #61, #605, Harris, Archer, Waltke, volume 1, p. 30, 263
            The Complete Wordstudy Dictionary of the Old Testament, Warren Baker, Eugene Carpenter, p. 33
            The New Strong?s Expanded Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible Red-letter Edition, James Strong, LL.D., S.T.D., Hebrew and Aramaic dictionary, p. 10

            Here is the message that the Classic Hebrew is conveying to us

            ? Tetragrammaton = singular
            ? Elohim = Plural
            ? Echad = one unity
            ? The juxtaposed words?Tetragrammaton, Elohim, Tetragrammaton, Echad
            ? God is referred to not once, not twice, but three times
            ? Singular, Plural, Singular
            ? These three elements form one unity
            ? Singular = Plural
            ? Plural = Singular
            ? God = Gods
            ? God is clearly singular
            ? God is clearly plural
            ? God is Uniplural

            Hence, it is little wonder why Jesus quoted and proclaimed this as most important?

            29
            30

            Mar 1229 And Jesus answered him, The first of all the commandments is "Hear, Israel. The Lord our God is one Lord,

            Mar 1230 and you shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul" and with all your mind, "and with all your strength." This is the first commandment. Deut. 64, 5

            It is interesting that Muslims do not even comprehend their own scriptures let alone the scriptures of the Jews and Christians?

            You would do well to research your ?arguments? before hand?

            Take care?

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • N Offline
              N Offline
              neo
              wrote on last edited by
              #43

              /\ You would do well to read & comprehend.

              'Assuming' you 're correct (el oh el), the statement "jesus is like allah, allah created adam from clay" has no linguistic consistency (note this is independent of language ) or value. This is like saying "I like coke, my eyes are blue". Two parts of a sentence that do not combine to convey any information whatsoever => linguistic inconsistency. Meaning, your inane interpretation is nothing more than a tripe attempt which results in nothing but an inherent inconsistency on your part.

              However, that's assuming you're correct in the first place.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • U Offline
                U Offline
                unknownuser
                wrote on last edited by
                #44

                /\ You would do well to read & comprehend.

                'Assuming' you 're correct (el oh el), the statement "jesus is like allah, allah created adam from clay" has no linguistic consistency (note this is independent of language o) or value. This is like saying "I like coke, my eyes are blue". Two parts of a sentence that do not combine to convey any information whatsoever => linguistic inconsistency. Meaning, your inane interpretation is nothing more than a tripe attempt which results in nothing but an inherent inconsistency on your part.

                However, that's assuming you're correct in the first place.

                Perhaps...in your future replies, instead of venting and giving your opinion on the matter, you could actually specifically refute our exegesis...

                Till then... wink

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • N Offline
                  N Offline
                  neo
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #45

                  That wasn't an opinion. Read it again. The refute comes in the form of linguistic inconsistency, as outlined. That, and the fact that your interpretation is just flat out wrong.

                  By the way, which part of my post is "venting"? I merely said you lack secondary school education - that's not 'venting', that's an observation.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • J Offline
                    J Offline
                    Jafar
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #46

                    ApplePie a simple answer please...
                    A / B / C / D or E
                    .

                    Then I'll tell u the meanings and differences of YACHID, ECHAD, YHVH and ELOHYM.

                    Then answer this

                    While Jesus (as) doing the "Daven" in "Kenisah/Synagogue", where the SHEMA are always proclaimed as part of the "Jewish Liturgy". What do you think Jesus (as) said when the SHEMA are being proclaimed altogether?

                    Is it

                    a. YHVH Eloheynu YHVH Echad - YHVH Our God YHVH One
                    (The correct shema, Deu 64)
                    or
                    b. Ani Eloheychem Ani Echad - I am your God I am One
                    c. Ani Eloheychem Ani Shelosha Hayah Echad - I am your God I am Three become One
                    d. Ani Eloheychem Ani Echad Mishelosha - I am your God I am one of the Three
                    e. Keep silent

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • U Offline
                      U Offline
                      unknownuser
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #47

                      albion wrote

                      Dhulqarnain..

                      Ahh, alas, a name near and dear to my heart. lol

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • U Offline
                        U Offline
                        unknownuser
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #48

                        That wasn't an opinion. Read it again. The refute comes in the form of linguistic inconsistency, as outlined. That, and the fact that your interpretation is just flat out wrong.

                        What part of our exegesis are you "refuting"....?

                        Please demonstrate with verifiable references... wink

                        By the way, which part of my post is "venting"? I merely said you lack secondary school education - that's not 'venting', that's an observation.

                        Your posts are no more than personal, unreferenced venting...

                        Thanks...

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • U Offline
                          U Offline
                          unknownuser
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #49

                          ApplePie a simple answer please...
                          A / B / C / D or E
                          .

                          Then I'll tell u the meanings and differences of YACHID, ECHAD, YHVH and ELOHYM.

                          Then answer this

                          While Jesus (as) doing the "Daven" in "Kenisah/Synagogue", where the SHEMA are always proclaimed as part of the "Jewish Liturgy". What do you think Jesus (as) said when the SHEMA are being proclaimed altogether?

                          Is it

                          a. YHVH Eloheynu YHVH Echad - YHVH Our God YHVH One
                          (The correct shema, Deu 64)
                          or
                          b. Ani Eloheychem Ani Echad - I am your God I am One
                          c. Ani Eloheychem Ani Shelosha Hayah Echad - I am your God I am Three become One
                          d. Ani Eloheychem Ani Echad Mishelosha - I am your God I am one of the Three
                          e. Keep silent

                          We already replied to your Shema "argument"...
                          wink

                          The ball is in your court...

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • N Offline
                            N Offline
                            neo
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #50

                            Please demonstrate with verifiable references... wink

                            Thanks...

                            You want me to link you to a grammar book?

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • J Offline
                              J Offline
                              Jafar
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #51

                              We already replied to your Shema "argument"...

                              Ah 'avoidance', you know it is the "BIG A" isn't it?

                              005.072

                              They do blaspheme who say "Allah is Christ the son of Mary." But said Christ "O Children of Israel! worship Allah, my Lord and your Lord." Whoever joins other gods with Allah,- Allah will forbid him the garden, and the Fire will be his abode. There will for the wrong-doers be no one to help.

                              004.171

                              O People of the Book! Commit no excesses in your religion Nor say of Allah aught but the truth. Christ Jesus the son of Mary was a messenger of Allah, and His Word, which He bestowed on Mary, and a spirit proceeding from Him so believe in Allah and His messengers. Say not "Trinity" desist it will be better for you for Allah is one Allah Glory be to Him (far exalted is He) above having a son. To Him belong all things in the heavens and on earth. And enough is Allah as a Disposer of affairs.

                              The rest is up to you..
                              We Moslems love Jesus too... we love him dearly...
                              He is one of God's special agents. An 'expert' on handling the munafiqoons (the hypocrites).

                              004.159
                              And there is none of the People of the Book but must believe in him (Jesus) before his death; and on the Day of Judgment he will be a witness against them

                              005.074
                              Why turn they not to Allah, and seek His forgiveness? For Allah is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful.

                              Shalom/Salam/Peace

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • U Offline
                                U Offline
                                unknownuser
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #52

                                We already replied to your Shema "argument"...

                                Ah 'avoidance', you know it is the "BIG A" isn't it?

                                005.072

                                They do blaspheme who say "Allah is Christ the son of Mary." But said Christ "O Children of Israel! worship Allah, my Lord and your Lord." Whoever joins other gods with Allah,- Allah will forbid him the garden, and the Fire will be his abode. There will for the wrong-doers be no one to help.

                                004.171

                                O People of the Book! Commit no excesses in your religion Nor say of Allah aught but the truth. Christ Jesus the son of Mary was a messenger of Allah, and His Word, which He bestowed on Mary, and a spirit proceeding from Him so believe in Allah and His messengers. Say not "Trinity" desist it will be better for you for Allah is one Allah Glory be to Him (far exalted is He) above having a son. To Him belong all things in the heavens and on earth. And enough is Allah as a Disposer of affairs.

                                The rest is up to you..
                                We Moslems love Jesus too... we love him dearly...
                                He is one of God's special agents. An 'expert' on handling the munafiqoons (the hypocrites).

                                004.159
                                And there is none of the People of the Book but must believe in him (Jesus) before his death; and on the Day of Judgment he will be a witness against them

                                005.074
                                Why turn they not to Allah, and seek His forgiveness? For Allah is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful.

                                Shalom/Salam/Peace

                                So quick to move on to "greener pastures"...you are...

                                You brought up the Shema...now refute our rebuttal....after all, it was in queue first...and please don't pretend that you were unanswered - pleading ignorance is a very tiresome quality of Muslims...

                                Thanks...

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • J Offline
                                  J Offline
                                  Jafar
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #53

                                  You brought up the Shema...now refute our rebuttal....

                                  Who is the "our" here ?
                                  Are u a 'triune-personalities' yourself?? (Father/Mother, Son/Daughter and Holy Spirit??) ('lol')

                                  Why don't we just let the 'real rabbi' do the refuting works, read on these articles

                                  The word 'echad, "one'
                                  http//www.jewsforjudaism.org/web/faq/faq062.html

                                  Shema and the so-called "Triune".
                                  http//www.jewsforjudaism.org/web/faq/faq060.html

                                  Shema and its 'deeper' meaning
                                  http//www.askmoses.com/qa_detail.html?h=147&o=137&pg=2

                                  What Is G-d
                                  http//www.askmoses.com/qa_detail.html?h=419&o=76

                                  What Is G-d Not
                                  http//www.askmoses.com/qa_detail.html?h=419&o=78

                                  What Is Idol Worship
                                  http//www.askmoses.com/qa_detail.html?h=419&o=105

                                  pleading ignorance is a very tiresome quality of Muslims...

                                  Thank you, for it has been written
                                  Mat 2312 "And whoever will exalt himself, will be humbled; and whoever will humble himself, will be exalted.

                                  Mat 410 For it has been written, 'The Lord your God ( ) you will prostrate yourself in worship before, and Him only will you sacredly serve.'"

                                  Jam 47 Submit yourselves therefore to God (Greek THEOS). Resist the devil, and he will flee from you.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • U Offline
                                    U Offline
                                    unknownuser
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #54

                                    You brought up the Shema...now refute our rebuttal....

                                    Who is the "our" here ?
                                    Are u a 'triune-personalities' yourself?? (Father/Mother, Son/Daughter and Holy Spirit??) ('lol')

                                    Why don't we just let the 'real rabbi' do the refuting works, read on these articles

                                    The word 'echad, "one'
                                    http//www.jewsforjudaism.org/web/faq/faq062.html

                                    Shema and the so-called "Triune".
                                    http//www.jewsforjudaism.org/web/faq/faq060.html

                                    Shema and its 'deeper' meaning
                                    http//www.askmoses.com/qa_detail.html?h=147&o=137&pg=2

                                    What Is G-d
                                    http//www.askmoses.com/qa_detail.html?h=419&o=76

                                    What Is G-d Not
                                    http//www.askmoses.com/qa_detail.html?h=419&o=78

                                    What Is Idol Worship
                                    http//www.askmoses.com/qa_detail.html?h=419&o=105

                                    pleading ignorance is a very tiresome quality of Muslims...

                                    Thank you, for it has been written
                                    Mat 2312 "And whoever will exalt himself, will be humbled; and whoever will humble himself, will be exalted.

                                    Mat 410 For it has been written, 'The Lord your God ( &#1498 you will prostrate yourself in worship before, and Him only will you sacredly serve.'"

                                    Jam 47 Submit yourselves therefore to God (Greek THEOS). Resist the devil, and he will flee from you.

                                    Unfortunately?.your five minute ?googled? weblinks show (surprise!) absolutely no references whatsoever?

                                    We would expect that you could at least verify your ?web sources? before making an assertion of which you are totally unable to back up yourself.

                                    This is asking a lot, as you cannot even rebut the fact that the Koran proclaims that Jesus was not created?

                                    Take care?

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • J Offline
                                      J Offline
                                      Jafar
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #55

                                      Unfortunately?.your five minute ?googled? weblinks show (surprise!) absolutely no references whatsoever?

                                      Oh really?? You should read more thoroughly... and 'show' some 'humility' (put away the arrogance)..

                                      This is asking a lot

                                      I'm not asking u for anything... its 100% your choice and your own life..

                                      as you cannot even rebut the fact that the Koran proclaims that Jesus was not created?

                                      Jesus was not a creation and that's a "fact" ??? lol

                                      OF COURSE JESUS WAS CREATED AND SO DOES MUHAMMAD, MOSES, HOLY SPIRIT, THE QURAN, TIME, KNOWLEDGE AND A WHOLE BUNCH MORE.

                                      Xtians (and so does other sects / religions / belief) 'idolatry' happens due to their misconception of "God".

                                      Quote from AskMoses's Idol Worshipping (U Should read this thoroughly)

                                      It says you can turn an abstract (G-d) into a concrete which of course, is impossible. Idol worship doesn?t just mean singing and dancing and bowing in front of funny-looking little statues?it means believing in any force, object or item outside of the infinite G-d Himself an angel, a constellation, a force of nature, A LIVING CREATURE?or a funny-looking little statue. EVERYTHING IS CREATED BY G-D, and to designate any piece of physical matter as ?G-d? or a ?Higher Power? is idol worship

                                      The concept of a Trinity, i.e. the idea that there is anything but a One and indivisible G-d, is considered totally alien to Jewish thought, and is certainly a contradiction to true monotheism

                                      http//www.askmoses.com/qa_detail.html?h=419&o=105

                                      And read all the rest of the articles, which I've given you the links, but that is all up to you... it is your life.. and its 100% your choice...

                                      Everything in Heavens and the earth and everyhing in the between belongs to God / Allah / YHVH / Our Father In Heavens and ALL are His creations. He is Rabbial Alamien / Melekh Ha Olam / The Cherisher, Maintainer, Master and Creator of All Universes.

                                      And there's a whole bunch of verses explaining that in the Quran.. read it by yourself...

                                      002.117
                                      002.117 To Him is due the primal origin of the heavens and the earth When He decreeth a matter, He saith to it "Be," and it is.

                                      019.093
                                      019.093 Not one of the beings in the heavens and the earth but must come to Most Gracious as a servant.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • U Offline
                                        U Offline
                                        unknownuser
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #56

                                        Greetings Jafar,

                                        Thanks for your reply?

                                        Quote
                                        Unfortunately?.your five minute ?googled? weblinks show (surprise!) absolutely no references whatsoever?

                                        Oh really?? You should read more thoroughly... and 'show' some 'humility' (put away the arrogance)..

                                        We read it thoroughly?

                                        Your reply to our Shema rebuttal was to immediately post web-links as your defense?not too impressive? roll

                                        Furthermore, you still have not shown any references for the web-pasted author?s opinion.

                                        Quote

                                        as you cannot even rebut the fact that the Koran proclaims that Jesus was not created?

                                        Jesus was not a creation and that's a "fact" ???

                                        Yes?it is a fact?even the Koran confirms that Jesus was never created.

                                        You can witness this for yourself from 3.59?

                                        OF COURSE JESUS WAS CREATED AND SO DOES MUHAMMAD, MOSES, HOLY SPIRIT, THE QURAN, TIME, KNOWLEDGE AND A WHOLE BUNCH MORE.

                                        We have shown you otherwise?and you cannot refute our position? wink

                                        Xtians (and so does other sects / religions / belief) 'idolatry' happens due to their misconception of "God".

                                        Muslims cannot even accurately interpret their very own ?scriptures??

                                        They require assistance to untwist what centuries of ignorance has done.

                                        Quote from AskMoses's Idol Worshipping (U Should read this thoroughly)

                                        It says you can turn an abstract (G-d) into a concrete which of course, is impossible. Idol worship doesn?t just mean singing and dancing and bowing in front of funny-looking little statues?it means believing in any force, object or item outside of the infinite G-d Himself an angel, a constellation, a force of nature, A LIVING CREATURE?or a funny-looking little statue. EVERYTHING IS CREATED BY G-D, and to designate any piece of physical matter as ?G-d? or a ?Higher Power? is idol worship

                                        The concept of a Trinity, i.e. the idea that there is anything but a One and indivisible G-d, is considered totally alien to Jewish thought, and is certainly a contradiction to true monotheism

                                        http//www.askmoses.com/qa_detail.html?h=419&o=105

                                        Key words?.?Jewish thought??

                                        Interesting that you did not mention Jewish scriptures?.but instead their thoughts on the matter?.this is no different than what Islam thinks of their own scriptures ? the two are in diametric opposition to each other.

                                        Furthermore?.it appears that you are unaware of what the Biblical concept of the Holy Trinity actually is?which has also been carried over into your book of faith by the authors of the Koran?

                                        And read all the rest of the articles, which I've given you the links, but that is all up to you... it is your life.. and its 100% your choice...

                                        Everything in Heavens and the earth and everyhing in the between belongs to God / Allah / YHVH / Our Father In Heavens and ALL are His creations. He is Rabbial Alamien / Melekh Ha Olam / The Cherisher, Maintainer, Master and Creator of All Universes.

                                        Unless you take Jesus as your Lord and Savior, then we are not worshiping the same Creator God of the Universe?

                                        Perhaps Islam has blinded you from seeing what is truly contained in your book of faith?

                                        Thanks?

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • T Offline
                                          T Offline
                                          TheNabi
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #57

                                          Salaam,

                                          You can witness this for yourself from 3.59?

                                          You can also witness the opposite from 359. Just my opinion. )

                                          Unless you take Jesus as your Lord and Savior, then we are not worshiping the same Creator God of the Universe?

                                          I still think you make no sense. You sound like this guy on another forum who actually believes he is the incarnation of the anti-Christ.

                                          Allah knows all things and Jesus must learn and Allah is his rabb/sustainer or lord .

                                          Perhaps Islam has blinded you from seeing what is truly contained in your book of faith?

                                          Sometimes when we stretch the meanings of things in the quran we will find that there are discrepencies which allows us to correct ourselves.

                                          Joe

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users