Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. Critical Examination of Islam
  3. Quranic Divinity
  4. Contradictions and inconsistencies in the quran?

Contradictions and inconsistencies in the quran?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Quranic Divinity
467 Posts 24 Posters 34.0k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    savage_carrot
    wrote on last edited by
    #90

    If only you defended the truth as well as you try to defend yourself and your opinions of your book...

    You can't seem to do a good job defending any.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • U Offline
      U Offline
      unknownuser
      wrote on last edited by
      #91

      Peace all. Magi makes a very good point. If verse 4;82 states that if the quran was from other than allah there would be many contradictions in it.
      Then this means any book without an obvious contradiction can be claimed to be from god...This gives divine claims to phonebooks,scientific journals,posters on free-minds( D .),sports magazines,newspaper reports etc,etc...Not much of a special claim,or is it?... Also does it not give a chance for the person(by human logic.) to state the book is not all from allah?
      I could put that claim in a very small pamphlet,verse or my own book. eg
      'My internet name on free-minds is enquirer'....This has no contradictions, and is thus a verse from god... Yes or no?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • U Offline
        U Offline
        unknownuser
        wrote on last edited by
        #92

        peace savage carrot. Very intellectual comment.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • S Offline
          S Offline
          savage_carrot
          wrote on last edited by
          #93

          Very intellectual comment.

          Thank you. Someone had to do it.

          'My internet name on free-minds is enquirer'....This has no contradictions, and is thus a verse from god... Yes or no?

          Did you read the verse itself? You will find the answer you seek.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • U Offline
            U Offline
            unknownuser
            wrote on last edited by
            #94

            peace thegod. Ok,if allah along with others can know what is in the wombs,what is the point of emhasizing allah knows what is in the wombs?
            And if you yourself admit the verse could mean other things,this shows that the verse is not entirely clear,or that you can take any interpretation that fits in with the current facts...How then does this make the quran a stable reference point or criterion? Any christian can also re-interpret his bible to stop it contradicting,or to make it more valid to the current scientific facts.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Z Offline
              Z Offline
              zenje
              wrote on last edited by
              #95

              Peace enquirer,

              peace Zenje. Ah,so i proved my point,you do make arbitrary divisions and harmful interpretations from your own ego,(on the basis of an internet dialogue)...Not from god. or is it?
              I just quoted a passage of truth, since you don't believe in it, I'm not sure what your harmful interpretation was.

              If only half the energy was spent on serving god and being tolerant and open-minded,the world might be a much better place.
              Actually I didn't use much energy at all, unless if that's what you meant. And I am serving the God, I'm glad it's not for you to judge though. wink If I'm not mistaken, you've spent more energy on the amount of posts in the past few days than I have in a month.

              How much energy does tolerance and "open-mindedness" take? ??

              Is an open-mind your idol?

              I notice when you guys run out of ideas you throw out your quranic misinterpretations
              Aww, does that bother you? Here's some more verses from "1400 years ago"!

              1. And if Our clear revelations are recited to them, you see hatred in the faces of those who have rejected. They are nearly close to attacking those who are reciting to them Our revelations! Say ?Shall I inform you of what is worse than this? The Fire, which God has promised to those who have rejected. What a miserable destiny!?

              2. The believers are those whom, when God is mentioned, their hearts reverence; and when His revelations are recited to them, it increases their faith; and they put their trust in their Lord.

              3. And if Our revelations are recited to them, they Say ?We have listened, and if we wish, we could have said the same thing. This is nothing but tales of the ancients!?

              Translate and interpret that as you like.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S Offline
                S Offline
                savage_carrot
                wrote on last edited by
                #96

                If I'm not mistaken, you've spent more energy on the amount of posts in the past few days than I have in a month.

                Lol, I wonder what's the secret? Twix bars?

                Is an open-mind your idol?

                lol

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • U Offline
                  U Offline
                  unknownuser
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #97

                  peace zenje. Your harmful interpretation comes from the fact you can quote a verse relating to disbelief when you perceive the person is outside your arbitrary definition of a muslim,dont use allah as an excuse to justify your so-called truth.
                  .Nothing that you have said really bothers me because i can see your comments are not very deep,and you want to subjugate your mind to a literal,dogmatic,narrow interpretation of the quran. You said your glad im not the judge of belief,didnt you judge me by quoting surah 109 to me?
                  I try not to follow any idols...,i try to follow god my friend. Whats wrong with an open-mind...What is the site called? ... Ps;very insightful comments savage carrot...Where have your quranic verses got to?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • T Offline
                    T Offline
                    thegod
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #98

                    enquirer wrote
                    Peace all. Magi makes a very good point. If verse 4;82 states that if the qurank was from other than allah there would be many contradictions in it.
                    Then this means any book without an obvious contradiction can be claimed to be from god...This gives divine claims to phonebooks,scientific journals,posters on free-minds( .),sports magazines,newspaper reports etc,etc...Not much of a special claim,or is it?... Also does it not give a chance for the person(by human logic.) to state the book is not all from allah?
                    I could put that claim in a very small pamphlet,verse or my own book. eg
                    'My internet name on free-minds is enquirer'....This has no contradictions, and is thus a verse from god... Yes or no?

                    lolz!! it states that had the quran been from other than allah it would have contained much conflicts...and not the other way round! i believe this has been adressed on this forum as well so i guess u probably have read some comments on this very good point! D

                    peace thegod. Ok,if allah along with others can know what is in the wombs,what is the point of emhasizing allah knows what is in the wombs?
                    And if you yourself admit the verse could mean other things,this shows that the verse is not entirely clear,or that you can take any interpretation that fits in with the current facts...How then does this make the quran a stable reference point or criterion? Any christian can also re-interpret his bible to stop it contradicting,or to make it more valid to the current scientific facts.

                    i would have liked to see u own up that it was a mistake...be it careless...to allege as words of god those which never were...would have set a trend between us to be more honest with rselves...still....never mind D

                    so have u changed the complaint from god only knowing to why god is emphasising that it knows the burden of the wombs? god also states that it knows what the hearts hide and what the tongues belie? any problems with that? -)

                    yes...it could mean other things without contradicting itself..like i can say it means god knows whether the womb bears a righteous person or an evil person and it will not be contradicitng itself as god is all-kowing...if christians or faithfuls of any other religion can reconcile their texts to themselves i have no problems with that D

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • U Offline
                      U Offline
                      unknownuser
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #99

                      Peace thegod. Can you point out the mistake you said i made please?
                      How far will you go to prove that there are no inconsistencies? Do you have any criteria for what is a contradiction? The problem if you keep reconciling texts,is that you can change them any time you perceive a contradiction...is that honest?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • S Offline
                        S Offline
                        savage_carrot
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #100

                        The problem if you keep reconciling texts,is that you can change them any time you perceive a contradiction...is that honest?

                        How has thegod changed the texts? You said ONLY God knows, the verse is apparently saying different. If you want a criteria, please start posting verses literally yourself before talking about contradictions, so you have one.

                        Below is an excellent site-

                        http//yaqb.org/

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • U Offline
                          U Offline
                          unknownuser
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #101

                          peace savage carrot. My comment was a general one,not addressed specifically to thegod. Why do you insist on telling me what to do? My comments on the verses include different possible translations,and any you or others can come up with.If your entitled to an opinion on what a verse means,then so am i. I notice you have answered very little,and your not quoting many verses. Look to yourself before you start asking others to do things. D

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • S Offline
                            S Offline
                            savage_carrot
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #102

                            Getting testy are we? For one in any decent debate especially one about inconsistencies in the quran we go to the source text, comprende? Thus, while posting an inconsistency we post the original text, literal if you must obviously. Otherwise, when someone goes to the source and explains what it means you scream blue murder. Changing texts! Versions of interpretation! (Not that that has anything to do with inconsistency in the quran, but it's what you say).

                            My insistence is on a good substantial debate with evidence for all to see and if you recall, you were too lazy to post the verses yourself, so who posted them? Three guesses. So look to yourself, your comments are just not holding up.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • U Offline
                              U Offline
                              unknownuser
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #103

                              Don't forget the crux of the issue. Contradictions in the quran. Please, let's stick to them. Next thing we hear will be, God is an idol (wasn't there some poster who said something along those lines?)...no, your mind is an idol, hell whatever you know is an idol. Let's just talk about contradictions in a book which 'claims' to come from God okay? Not the phone/math book line of reasoning please.

                              Haha that was really funny sister lol lol

                              Enquirer, I'm preparing a long Quran comment as a reply to your first comment in this thread, will be back in a little while

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • U Offline
                                U Offline
                                unknownuser
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #104

                                Peace savage carrot. Why should i get testy? Your intellectual input is quite low. My comments are not holding up to you,but i see very little refutation,just posturing. I have not seen much good substantial debate from you...Just defensiveness...And your right,i dont want to literally post every verse word for word,im sure there are other people who are more capable of doing that,and im sure some of them know which verses im referring too. If your not too lazy yourself why dont you post the verses?
                                Or are you all talk and no action? D

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • T Offline
                                  T Offline
                                  thegod
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #105

                                  enquirer wrote
                                  Peace thegod. Can you point out the mistake you said i made please?

                                  yes...u said new technology can determine what is in the womb and called it an inconsistency with literal interpretations..the text of the quran does not reflect the inconsistency u claimed D

                                  enquirer wrote
                                  What about the new pictures we have on an ultrasound of babies in the womb? Can you see an inconsistency with the literal interpretations?

                                  enquirer wrote
                                  How far will you go to prove that there are no inconsistencies? Do you have any criteria for what is a contradiction? The problem if you keep reconciling texts,is that you can change them any time you perceive a contradiction...is that honest?

                                  that would not be honest...but u have to determine inconsistencies and contradictions according to a standard other than ur logical self...ur intentions might be alright..but ur understanding as a standard would definitely be insufficient...especially if v really intend to determine the status of the text!

                                  that said the verse does not claim god alone knows what is in the womb!

                                  further even my interpretation does not 'reconcile' the text by means of chicanery....its perfectly valid and in no way contradicts the message of the quran elsewhere

                                  personally much of what is said against text of religion a by followers of religion b i discard if the text can reconcile with itself without any twisting and distorting...and a and b can be any 2 religions on the face of this earth! -)
                                  nice talking to u and others...as well as readin....do keep the criticism comin if u genuinely feel so...but i guess i will be leaving shortly! =;

                                  ####### peace -)

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • S Offline
                                    S Offline
                                    savage_carrot
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #106

                                    You really are a character. Coming from you any output would be appreciated leaving aside intellect. If you don't agree with someone, you start giving their posts (and them by connection) thesauristic abuse. I did post the verses, pity you are still hanging on to your flimsy excuses... other people more capable. You got that right.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • U Offline
                                      U Offline
                                      unknownuser
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #107

                                      Peace thegod. Nice talking to you as well. Please dont take offense at my comments.
                                      I did also state that if god is not the only one to know whats in the wombs,then what is the point of the verse mentioning or emphasising it? Also i said some interpret it to mean only god knows whats in the wombs,i was not saying that i necessarily agree with that interpretation...
                                      If our goal is to be rational,open-minded,tolerant and honest then i see no problem in this dialogue. take it easy.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • U Offline
                                        U Offline
                                        unknownuser
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #108

                                        peace savage carrot. Are you going to say something of logic or benefit please? You need to control your emotional responses. And how about some refutations of the contradictions? D

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • A Offline
                                          A Offline
                                          agentxxx
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #109

                                          peace all,

                                          14 4. We sent not a messenger except (to teach) IN THE LANGUAGE OF HIS (OWN) PEOPLE, in order to make (things) clear to them. Now Allah leaves straying those whom He pleases and guides whom He pleases and He is Exalted in power, full of Wisdom.

                                          1. For me, I have been commanded to serve the LORD OF THIS CITY, Him Who has sanctified it and to Whom (belong) all things and I am commanded to be of those who bow in Islam to Allah's Will,-

                                          2. By the Book that makes things clear
                                            433.We have made it QUR?AN IN ARABIC, that YE MAY BE ABLE TO UNDERSTAND (and learn wisdom).

                                          12 2. We have sent it down as an ARABIC QUR'AN, in order THAT YE MAY learn wisdom.

                                          42 7. And thus have We revealed to you AN ARABIC QURAN, that you may WARN the MOTHER CITY and those around it, and that you may give warning of the day of gathering together wherein is no doubt; a party shall be in the garden and (another) party in the burning fire.

                                          1. Thus have We sent this down - AN ARABIC QUR'AN - and explained therein in detail some of the warnings, in order that they may fear Allah, or that it may cause their remembrance (of Him).

                                          2. Had We sent this AS A QUR'AN (IN THE LANGUAGE) OTHER THAN ARABIC, THEY WOULD HAVE SAID "Why are not its verses explained in detail? What! (a Book) not in Arabic and (a Messenger an Arab?" Say "It is a Guide and a Healing to those who believe; and for those who believe not, there is a deafness in their ears, and it is blindness in their (eyes) They are (as it were) being called from a place far distant!"

                                          3. Had We revealed it to any of THE NON-ARABS,

                                          4. And had he recited it to them, THEY WOULD NOT HAVE BELIEVED IN IT.

                                          the THEM, YE or THEY in the above verses are the native arabs who lived at that time and not us, according to verses 26198/199 if God had send a non arabic messenger, the arabs would have never believed in it??? so its a little confusing why it is expected from non arabs to believe in an arabic book, from a to z without even raising an eyebro? a book revealed 1400 years ago, which is not explained to us by the prophet himself in our language, but by men who translate it and interpret it and then want us to believe that every word is from God himself ? shouldnt we have the same rights similiar to those of the ancient arabs? so please take it easy on those who are a bit skeptical and keep in mind the verses 26198/199.

                                          peace.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users