Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. The 3:7 Challenge to Arnold Yasin

The 3:7 Challenge to Arnold Yasin

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
32 Posts 4 Posters 80 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • U Offline
    U Offline
    unknownuser
    wrote on last edited by
    #13

    Not directly, as 'waw' is not directly an end to a sentence

    "waw" is inherently a linking word, meaning and/ furthermore / in addition / along with, and in some cases "that is"

    Peace bro

    I didn?t say the Waw is directly of indirectly an end to a sentence, I said the Waw is commonly known to be AT THE START OF A NEW SENTENCE, AND THIS IS KNOWN ION ALL LANGUAGES, EXACTLY AS I USED IT IN THIS VER SENTENCE I JUST WROTE

    Also i want AB to answer these points

    Sure as long as it is related to 37

    1.In order to believe in all the verses of the Quran, one does not need to be deeply rooted in knowledge. To be a "believer" is a sufficient condition to beleive all the verses. However, one needs to have deep knowledge of the Quran in order to understand "mutashabih" (multiple meaning) verses accurately. Therefore, 37 mentions a narrow category (those who deeply rooted in knowledge) in relation with those multiple meaning verses.

    Bro the knowledge mentioned is the knowledge of knowing Allah, not the knowledge of knowing science nor languages, I believe I stated that already

    2.If we follow the traditional translation of 37,

    I didn?t follow any traditio0ns, this is the clear context of 37 combined with knowing what Allah is

    then, we must have a clear definition of "mutashabih" verses in order to avoid trying to understand them.

    sure, when you meet a verse that is not clear or does not make any sense and you exhausted all logic to find that it is not mutashabih then it is mutashabih, I guess everyone have a brain, I wonder why they don?t use it sometimes

    According to your translation, if one tries to understand a verse and that verse happens to be a mutashabih, then that person is in danger to become a hypocrite.

    Not really trying to understand the meaning of the mutashabih rather confirming that it is a mutashabih verse when finding out that all possible understandings can?t be eliminated ?logically speaking?, like 43 for example which is a clear cut mutashabih verse

    Therefore, you must be able to identify ALL the mutashabih verses.

    As you collide with them while reading the Quran, yes why not if you can

    Can you provide us with a list of mutashabih verses?

    Not a list but we can start with 43 if you like and then as I read the Quran and find them I will give a call of FM, I?m sure the Mutashabihat verses are very rare in the Quran because I hardly read over ten if I can remember well

    Can you justify your criteria for your selection? How can your lack of understanding be criteria for others?

    Sorry. Could not understand the question, what do you mean by my lack of knowledge be criteria for others?, it can?t be for sure, the criteria I?m talking about is the criteria of knowing a verse is mutshabih or not, this criteria is simply explained twice earlier

    Someone's lack of understanding of one verse cannot make a verse "taboo" for all other people. Otherwise, the lowest degree of understanding will be the common denominator in understanding of the Quran. The more verse you don't understand the more you will be safe, and the more verse you understand the more you will be a subject for accusation to be a hypocrite.

    Yeh the above apply on the Muhkamat verses

    3.The intention of those who try to understand the multiple-meaning verses is important. With the disease in their harts, they try to confuse others by focusing on multiple meaning verses. Since only sincere believers possess the quality to understand the Quran (1746; 1857; 5417), hypocrites will not be able to find the true meaning of multiple-meaning words. They either try to take them out of context or disregard other verses that bring explanation to them. For instance

    ". . . And we sent down to you this message, to proclaim (litubayyena) for the people everything that is sent down to them, perhaps they will reflect (1644).

    again I got confused with you here bro, please donlt make it harder for me, my two questions are not answered yet, these are the two important points you need to clear out

    How come the people with knowledge refer to the Mutashabihat verses distinguished from the Muhkamat while they managed to understand it as you claim?

    How Allah will say with the people with knowledge that They believe in both as both from Allah?

    The word "'lituBaYyeNa" is a derivative of "BYN", which is a multiple-meaning word. It means 1) To reveal what is concealed. 2) To explain what is vague. The first meaning is the antonym of "hide", the second is the antonym of "make vague". God orders Muhammad to proclaim the revelation which is revealed to him personally. Indeed, this is the whole mission of the messengers." (1635)

    So you agree that the messenger has another role which is Le Tobain to the believers what was sent down to them, good now I got you cornered, now you should believe in some of the hadith because the prophet in it explained to us what was sent down to us, now 37 didn?t say Allah and His prophets will crack the meaning of the Mutashabihat verses, it said Allah and the people with knowledge, so what the prophets mission has to do with 37 exactly?

    Prophets sometimes experience difficulty in proclaiming the revelation (3337; 2025). If the Quran is a profound Arabic book, if it is explained by God, and if it is simple to understand (515; 26195; 111; 5417; 551-2), then the prophet does not have an extra mission to explain it. Furthermore, the verse 7519 does not leave any room for an extra human explanation. Thus, the word "litubayyena" of 1644 is similar to the one in 3187. Verse 3187 tells us that the people who received the revelation should "proclaim the scripture to the people, and never conceal it."

    Not sure what that has to do with 37?, but anyway bro 37 was not talking about any messenger rather the people with knowledge, I agree that the messengers are from the people with knowledge but I just don?t understand your point of bringing the messengers struggle into the discussion of 37

    The Quran broadcasts a very clear message. However, the problem is with our receivers. If our receiver does not hear the broadcast or cannot understand it well, then something is wrong with our receiver and we have to check it. If the signal is weak, we need to recharge our batteries, or reset our antennas. If we do not receive a clear message, we need to tune into the station, to the station of Quran alone, in order to get rid of the noises and interference from other sources. We may ask some help from knowledgeable people or experts for this task. If the receiver does not work at all, then we have to make a sincere effort to fix the broken parts. However, if we believe that the problem is in the broadcast, then nobody can help us. The divine broadcast can be heard in detail only by those who sincerely tune in, i.e., those who take it seriously and act accordingly. The condition of our receiver and the antenna, the power of the battery, and the precision level of our tuning are very important in getting the divine message properly.

    "None can grasp it except the sincere." (5679)

    good, now I ask your sincerity to blossom and answer the two questions I raised please

    The Quran is simple to understand (5411).

    Are you sure this is 5411?

    (11)

    Whoever opens his/her mind and heart as a monotheist and takes the time to study it, will understand it.

    I agree however I?m not sure if they will understand fully though?

    This understanding will be enough for salvation. Beyond this, to understand the multi-meaning verses or allegorical descriptions you do not need to be a messenger of God.

    So why you brought the messengers of God into the picture then?

    If you have a good mind and have studied the Quran as a believer, that is, if you have a deep knowledge, then you will be able to understand the true meanings of multiple-meaning verses.

    Good, can you now explain to me wjhich meaning is for 43 and why?, thanks

    The verse 37, which is about the multiple-meaning verses, points this fact in a multiple-meaning way ". . . No one knows their true meaning except God and those who possess knowledge. . " Obviously, those who are confused by contradictory teaching of clergymen (ulama) do not possess knowledge and unable to understand this verse.

    Good, why Allah then say with them ?They say we believe in both as from Allah??, you have to conclusively tell us why Allah is excluded from ?They say? according to the Arabic context, thanks

    5.There are some Sunni commentators who support our understanding.

    I really care about what sect they belong to, howver bring those sunni on and let them answer my two simple questions

    For instance, the classic commentary of al-Baydawi prefers this understanding. Please note that Yusuf Ali also acknowledges this fact in the footnote of 37 "One reading, rejected by the majority of Commentators, but accepted by Mujahid and others, would not make a break at the point marked Waqfa Lazim, but would run the two sentences together. In that case the construction would run 'No one knows its hidden meanings except God and those who are firm in knowledge. They say', etc." If you are not determining the truth by the number of votes (majority), then, I suggest you reflect on the reasons I have listed here.

    Irrelevant, we need two answers to two simple questions before we take that understanding, who is They? And if they say Allah is excluded from ?They? then they have to conclusively prove it from the Arabic context

    So i believe it is not correct in its usage of AB. And that it is God AND the people with knowledge, as the points above, common sense and the understanding that God sended the book to guide us, so verses humankind cannot in the end is useless to send with a book to guide. There can be no reasonable answer to this.

    Fine if you insist, I only convey a message and it is now conveyed

    The good point he makes that must be investigated is

    , i.e. We believe in the Book; the whole of it is from our Lord??, see, this alone should demolish that non sensible understanding that those with knowledge will understand the meaning of the Mutashabihat verse along with Allah, because Allah should not say ? We believe in the Book; the whole of it is from our Lord?

    Peace

    Thank you and I would like a logical answer to this if you really kean to clear my ignorance

    Salam

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • U Offline
      U Offline
      unknownuser
      wrote on last edited by
      #14

      So 37 is talking about the "signs" in the "al kitab."

      Ahmed, are you sure that in 37 al kitab means al quran?

      100%

      Cheers

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • P Offline
        P Offline
        phoenix1
        wrote on last edited by
        #15

        peace Ahmed,

        why?

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • U Offline
          U Offline
          unknownuser
          wrote on last edited by
          #16

          peace Ahmed,

          why?

          Ok bro when I have time I will explain why as this is going to be long "i feel", I have to get going with the things that i have to do before I fly in 3 days, here is a sample of what i have to do

          1. clean my wife car and my car
          2. clean my fish tank
          3. finish and deliver a databse to a client (I'm working on this DB since 2001)
          4. Prepare about 250,000 new records a call center to have enough calls while I'm away,
          5. get all the things I need to take with me overseas

          man this is just a sample and i have to get going but I got you flagged on Profiler 2006 and surely you will hear from me why Al Kitab in 37 must means Al Quran 100%

          cheers

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • P Offline
            P Offline
            phoenix1
            wrote on last edited by
            #17

            peace Ahmed,

            take your time bro, I'm in no hurry.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • A Offline
              A Offline
              arnoldyasin
              wrote on last edited by
              #18

              Peace,

              AB, not all of your answers are good, but there is no need for me to answer them, as somebody has given me the exact answer i was looking for. So i agree with AB conclusion. I first didn't accept this translation, because people couldn't answer some questions about the logic behind it, now i got those answers. I first have to ask i can post them on the forum, so we have to wait for that. But it was not only the arabic that convinced but me also the answer related to it.

              Like i said, i'm no arabic expert, but i have studied a lot, not to be satisfied with simple answers. But AB, you're right, i will not intervene no more before i have good answers. But on this issue i accepted an article which gave good answers i thought. That is why i answered phoenix then.

              Peace

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • P Offline
                P Offline
                phoenix1
                wrote on last edited by
                #19

                peace arnold,

                may I have a look at the article?

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • A Offline
                  A Offline
                  arnoldyasin
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #20

                  This is what Ayman gave as answer to me which answered all my questions

                  003.007
                  YUSUFALI He it is Who has sent down to thee the Book In it are verses
                  basic or fundamental (of established meaning); they are the foundation
                  of the Book others are allegorical. But those in whose hearts is
                  perversity follow the part thereof that is allegorical, seeking discord,
                  and searching for its hidden meanings, but no one knows its hidden
                  meanings except Allah. And those who are firmly grounded in knowledge
                  say "We believe in the Book; the whole of it is from our Lord" and
                  none will grasp the Message except men of understanding.
                  PICKTHAL He it is Who hath revealed unto thee (Muhammad) the Scripture
                  wherein are clear revelations - they are the substance of the Book - and
                  others (which are) allegorical. But those in whose hearts is doubt
                  pursue, forsooth, that which is allegorical seeking (to cause)
                  dissension by seeking to explain it. None knoweth its explanation save
                  Allah. And those who are of sound instruction say We believe therein;
                  the whole is from our Lord; but only men of understanding really heed.
                  SHAKIR He it is Who has revealed the Book to you; some of its verses
                  are decisive, they are the basis of the Book, and others are
                  allegorical; then as for those in whose hearts there is perversity they
                  follow the part of it which is allegorical, seeking to mislead and
                  seeking to give it (their own) interpretation. but none knows its
                  interpretation except Allah, and those who are firmly rooted in
                  knowledge say We believe in it, it is all from our Lord; and none do
                  mind except those having understanding.
                  KHALIFA He sent down to you this scripture, containing straightforward
                  verses - which constitute the essence of the scripture - as well as
                  multiple-meaning or allegorical verses. Those who harbor doubts in their
                  hearts will pursue the multiple-meaning verses to create confusion, and
                  to extricate a certain meaning. None knows the true meaning thereof
                  except GOD and those well founded in knowledge. They say, "We believe in
                  this - all of it comes from our Lord." Only those who possess
                  intelligence will take heed.

                  The "waw" can be used both to separate a new sentence and for addition
                  (similar to an English "and&quot. We find examples of both types of usages
                  in the great reading. So only looking at the "waw" doesn't tell us
                  enough information to decide either way. So we need to look at other
                  info in the passage. When we look at the rest of the passage we see that
                  the verb coming after "those who are firmly grounded in knowledge" is
                  the verb "say" in the plural ("yaquloon&quot. Now notice how all
                  translators above, except for Khalifa, correctly don't put the pronoun
                  "hum" (they) before "yaquloon" and they just replicate the exact Arabic
                  sentence as "those who are firmly grounded in knowledge say". Only
                  Khalifa is forced to put the pronoun "they" before "say", which is
                  non-existent in the Arabic original, to make the passage work. This is
                  for the simple reason that Khalifa knew very well that not putting the
                  "they" in front of "say" and adding "those well founded in knowledge" to
                  GOD would result in "GOD and those well founded in knowledge say".
                  Since, clearly the sentence "We believe in this - all of it comes from
                  our Lord" cannot be uttered by The God, then he needed to change the
                  words and insert a pronoun that is not in the original Arabic. The other
                  translators didn't have to do that because they ended the sentence
                  before the "waw". So in this case, the evidence from the passage itself
                  leans heavily towards the "waw" being used as a sentence separator as
                  opposed to for addition.

                  More evidence is in the word "taawil" itself. I don't think that any of
                  the translators really did a good job in translating this key word. The
                  word comes from "awal" which means "original/first/ultimate". So it is
                  not just any meaning/understanding/interpretation but it is the
                  original/first/ultimate meaning/understanding/interpretation. Now this
                  type of meaning can only be known to the author of the text that is
                  subject to interpretation. This is true even for human authors. For
                  example, you can understand and interpret what an author means in a
                  novel but maybe you don't know that he or she based this passage on a
                  childhood experience or a certain likes and dislikes, etc. Essentially,
                  you would heve to delve into the psyche of the human author to know the
                  original/first/ultimate meaning/understanding/interpretation. Of course,
                  this is impossible.

                  Other passages of the great reading confirm this understanding. You see
                  the same word in 753. It is addressing those who are waiting or expect
                  the original/first/ultimate meaning/understanding/interpretation. The
                  passage says that when the actual original/first/ultimate
                  meaning/understanding/interpretation comes, it will be on the day of the
                  account and by then it will be too late.

                  Look around you and empirically verify the right path by comparing it to
                  the path of the stayers (16-7). You will see that the people who think
                  that they have the original/first/ultimate
                  meaning/understanding/interpretation have stopped trying to get closer
                  to the truth. They are misguided and not progressing. If you or I
                  thought that we had the original/first/ultimate
                  meaning/understanding/interpretation, then we wouldn't be here today. It
                  is only those who are firmly grounded in reality that know that what we
                  know is far less than what we don't know. This is true about all of The
                  God's signs in the universe and not just in the great reading.

                  I think that 37 and 7431 are linked together by 226. Here is my
                  translation of those passages

                  1. He is the one who descended on you the book. From it are judging
                    signs that are the origin of the book, and others that are allegorical.
                    So in the case of
                    (1) Those in whose hearts there is blurriness, they pursue what is
                    allegorical from it (the book) desiring the "fitna"/trial/affliction and
                    desiring its (what is allegorical from the book) original
                    interpretation. And none knows its (what is allegorical from the book)
                    original interpretation except The God. And,
                    (2) Those who are firmly grounded in knowledge say "We have faith in it
                    (the book), both (types of signs) are from our Lord."
                    And none remembers other than those with intellects.

                  2. The God does not shy away from citing any kind of allegory, from a
                    mosquito to what is greater. As for those who have faith, they know that
                    it is the truth from their Lord. As for those who are unappreciative,
                    they say, "What did The God mean by such an allegory misleading many
                    thereby and guiding many thereby?" But He never misleads thereby except
                    the wicked.

                  3. And we didn't make the owners/companions of the Fire except
                    controllers; and
                    We didn't make their count except as a "fitna"/trial/affliction for
                    those who have been unappreciative;
                    so that
                    (1) those who were given the book be sure, those who had faith increase
                    in faith and those who were given the book and those who had faith do
                    not have doubt.
                    And, so that
                    (2) those in whose hearts there is sickness and the unappreciative say
                    "What did The God want with this example?" Like this The God misguides
                    whom He wills and guides whom He wills.
                    And none knows your Lord's soldiers except Him.
                    And it is nothing except a reminder for the humans.

                  I hope that you can see those connections.

                  Peace and all best wishes,

                  Ayman

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • U Offline
                    U Offline
                    unknownuser
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #21

                    Peace arnoldyasin. So what is the new translation of this important verse,and what are the implications?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • K Offline
                      K Offline
                      KGB
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #22

                      What I understand after reading Ayman reply is that he agree with Ahmed Bahgat.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • A Offline
                        A Offline
                        arnoldyasin
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #23

                        Yes, he agrees with AB, and me too now.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • K Offline
                          K Offline
                          KGB
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #24

                          So the purpose of this topic reached a happy conclusion. I am glad to see mutual agreement and understanding of the verse.

                          Thanks to Ahmed Bahgat and Ayman.

                          Sadiqi I pray for your father health and wish you and your family a safe journey.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • P Offline
                            P Offline
                            phoenix1
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #25

                            peace

                            Great answer by Ayman. Cleared a lot of things up.
                            I Agree with Mr.Bahgat now ) His explanation I still don't understand, though.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • U Offline
                              U Offline
                              unknownuser
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #26

                              Thank you all

                              I'm just puzzled where is brother Ayman comment?

                              I'm very interested to read it

                              thanks

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • P Offline
                                P Offline
                                phoenix1
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #27

                                peace AB, below is Ayman's answer as posted by Arnoldyasin. I don't know what it answers or where he got it from confused ) but it makes sense.

                                003.007
                                YUSUFALI He it is Who has sent down to thee the Book In it are verses
                                basic or fundamental (of established meaning); they are the foundation
                                of the Book others are allegorical. But those in whose hearts is
                                perversity follow the part thereof that is allegorical, seeking discord,
                                and searching for its hidden meanings, but no one knows its hidden
                                meanings except Allah. And those who are firmly grounded in knowledge
                                say "We believe in the Book; the whole of it is from our Lord" and
                                none will grasp the Message except men of understanding.
                                PICKTHAL He it is Who hath revealed unto thee (Muhammad) the Scripture
                                wherein are clear revelations - they are the substance of the Book - and
                                others (which are) allegorical. But those in whose hearts is doubt
                                pursue, forsooth, that which is allegorical seeking (to cause)
                                dissension by seeking to explain it. None knoweth its explanation save
                                Allah. And those who are of sound instruction say We believe therein;
                                the whole is from our Lord; but only men of understanding really heed.
                                SHAKIR He it is Who has revealed the Book to you; some of its verses
                                are decisive, they are the basis of the Book, and others are
                                allegorical; then as for those in whose hearts there is perversity they
                                follow the part of it which is allegorical, seeking to mislead and
                                seeking to give it (their own) interpretation. but none knows its
                                interpretation except Allah, and those who are firmly rooted in
                                knowledge say We believe in it, it is all from our Lord; and none do
                                mind except those having understanding.
                                KHALIFA He sent down to you this scripture, containing straightforward
                                verses - which constitute the essence of the scripture - as well as
                                multiple-meaning or allegorical verses. Those who harbor doubts in their
                                hearts will pursue the multiple-meaning verses to create confusion, and
                                to extricate a certain meaning. None knows the true meaning thereof
                                except GOD and those well founded in knowledge. They say, "We believe in
                                this - all of it comes from our Lord." Only those who possess
                                intelligence will take heed.

                                The "waw" can be used both to separate a new sentence and for addition
                                (similar to an English "and&quot. We find examples of both types of usages
                                in the great reading. So only looking at the "waw" doesn't tell us
                                enough information to decide either way. So we need to look at other
                                info in the passage. When we look at the rest of the passage we see that
                                the verb coming after "those who are firmly grounded in knowledge" is
                                the verb "say" in the plural ("yaquloon&quot. Now notice how all
                                translators above, except for Khalifa, correctly don't put the pronoun
                                "hum" (they) before "yaquloon" and they just replicate the exact Arabic
                                sentence as "those who are firmly grounded in knowledge say". Only
                                Khalifa is forced to put the pronoun "they" before "say", which is
                                non-existent in the Arabic original, to make the passage work. This is
                                for the simple reason that Khalifa knew very well that not putting the
                                "they" in front of "say" and adding "those well founded in knowledge" to
                                GOD would result in "GOD and those well founded in knowledge say".
                                Since, clearly the sentence "We believe in this - all of it comes from
                                our Lord" cannot be uttered by The God, then he needed to change the
                                words and insert a pronoun that is not in the original Arabic. The other
                                translators didn't have to do that because they ended the sentence
                                before the "waw". So in this case, the evidence from the passage itself
                                leans heavily towards the "waw" being used as a sentence separator as
                                opposed to for addition.

                                More evidence is in the word "taawil" itself. I don't think that any of
                                the translators really did a good job in translating this key word. The
                                word comes from "awal" which means "original/first/ultimate". So it is
                                not just any meaning/understanding/interpretation but it is the
                                original/first/ultimate meaning/understanding/interpretation. Now this
                                type of meaning can only be known to the author of the text that is
                                subject to interpretation. This is true even for human authors. For
                                example, you can understand and interpret what an author means in a
                                novel but maybe you don't know that he or she based this passage on a
                                childhood experience or a certain likes and dislikes, etc. Essentially,
                                you would heve to delve into the psyche of the human author to know the
                                original/first/ultimate meaning/understanding/interpretation. Of course,
                                this is impossible.

                                Other passages of the great reading confirm this understanding. You see
                                the same word in 753. It is addressing those who are waiting or expect
                                the original/first/ultimate meaning/understanding/interpretation. The
                                passage says that when the actual original/first/ultimate
                                meaning/understanding/interpretation comes, it will be on the day of the
                                account and by then it will be too late.

                                Look around you and empirically verify the right path by comparing it to
                                the path of the stayers (16-7). You will see that the people who think
                                that they have the original/first/ultimate
                                meaning/understanding/interpretation have stopped trying to get closer
                                to the truth. They are misguided and not progressing. If you or I
                                thought that we had the original/first/ultimate
                                meaning/understanding/interpretation, then we wouldn't be here today. It
                                is only those who are firmly grounded in reality that know that what we
                                know is far less than what we don't know. This is true about all of The
                                God's signs in the universe and not just in the great reading.

                                I think that 37 and 7431 are linked together by 226. Here is my
                                translation of those passages

                                1. He is the one who descended on you the book. From it are judging
                                  signs that are the origin of the book, and others that are allegorical.
                                  So in the case of
                                  (1) Those in whose hearts there is blurriness, they pursue what is
                                  allegorical from it (the book) desiring the "fitna"/trial/affliction and
                                  desiring its (what is allegorical from the book) original
                                  interpretation. And none knows its (what is allegorical from the book)
                                  original interpretation except The God. And,
                                  (2) Those who are firmly grounded in knowledge say "We have faith in it
                                  (the book), both (types of signs) are from our Lord."
                                  And none remembers other than those with intellects.

                                2. The God does not shy away from citing any kind of allegory, from a
                                  mosquito to what is greater. As for those who have faith, they know that
                                  it is the truth from their Lord. As for those who are unappreciative,
                                  they say, "What did The God mean by such an allegory misleading many
                                  thereby and guiding many thereby?" But He never misleads thereby except
                                  the wicked.

                                3. And we didn't make the owners/companions of the Fire except
                                  controllers; and
                                  We didn't make their count except as a "fitna"/trial/affliction for
                                  those who have been unappreciative;
                                  so that
                                  (1) those who were given the book be sure, those who had faith increase
                                  in faith and those who were given the book and those who had faith do
                                  not have doubt.
                                  And, so that
                                  (2) those in whose hearts there is sickness and the unappreciative say
                                  "What did The God want with this example?" Like this The God misguides
                                  whom He wills and guides whom He wills.
                                  And none knows your Lord's soldiers except Him.
                                  And it is nothing except a reminder for the humans.

                                I hope that you can see those connections.

                                Peace and all best wishes,

                                Ayman

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • U Offline
                                  U Offline
                                  unknownuser
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #28

                                  Thank you phonix

                                  it feels good when muslims agree together

                                  cheers

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • P Offline
                                    P Offline
                                    phoenix1
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #29

                                    peace Ahmed,

                                    it does. sun

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • U Offline
                                      U Offline
                                      unknownuser
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #30

                                      peace Ahmed,

                                      it does. sun

                                      I will take the chance and say sorry to arnold as i didn't notice that he was the one that posted Ayman comment, i left the thread for a day and today looked at the last comments then tried to see where is Ayman comment but could not find it so i asked my question pre maturaly I guess, but thanks for the help

                                      cheers

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • U Offline
                                        U Offline
                                        unknownuser
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #31

                                        peace

                                        for those who couldn't see it

                                        This is Ayman's tralnslation of verse 37

                                        1. He is the one who descended on you the book. From it are judging
                                          signs that are the origin of the book, and others that are allegorical.
                                          So in the case of
                                          (1) Those in whose hearts there is blurriness, they pursue what is
                                          allegorical from it (the book) desiring the "fitna"/trial/affliction and
                                          desiring its (what is allegorical from the book) original
                                          interpretation. And none knows its (what is allegorical from the book)
                                          original interpretation except The God. And,
                                          (2) Those who are firmly grounded in knowledge say "We have faith in it
                                          (the book), both (types of signs) are from our Lord."
                                          And none remembers other than those with intellects.

                                        Completely agree w/ it. Makes A lot more sense. And Thanks to Ayman

                                        God bless

                                        God is the Greatest !

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • A Offline
                                          A Offline
                                          arnoldyasin
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #32

                                          Peace,

                                          Someone sended me this also, plus i got the mail from Ayman through personal contact.

                                          Mutashabihaat , Mukimaat

                                          003.007
                                          YUSUFALI He it is Who has sent down to thee the Book In it are verses basic or fundamental (of established meaning); they are the foundation of the Book others are allegorical. But those in whose hearts is perversity follow the part thereof that is allegorical, seeking discord, and searching for its hidden meanings, but no one knows its hidden meanings except Allah. And those who are firmly grounded in knowledge say "We believe in the Book; the whole of it is from our Lord" and none will grasp the Message except men of understanding.
                                          PICKTHAL He it is Who hath revealed unto thee (Muhammad) the Scripture wherein are clear revelations - they are the substance of the Book - and others (which are) allegorical. But those in whose hearts is doubt pursue, forsooth, that which is allegorical seeking (to cause) dissension by seeking to explain it. None knoweth its explanation save Allah. And those who are of sound instruction say We believe therein; the whole is from our Lord; but only men of understanding really heed.
                                          SHAKIR He it is Who has revealed the Book to you; some of its verses are decisive, they are the basis of the Book, and others are allegorical; then as for those in whose hearts there is perversity they follow the part of it which is allegorical, seeking to mislead and seeking to give it (their own) interpretation. but none knows its interpretation except Allah, and those who are firmly rooted in knowledge say We believe in it, it is all from our Lord; and none do mind except those having understanding.

                                          This ayah explains that there are two different kind of ayah in Quran, one Muhkimaat and the other Mutashabihaat. Generally speaking all the ayah which have guidelines mandatory to live in a harmonious way in a society are in the category of Mukimaat and one does not get confused and there are no other meaning which one could invent such as ?atee uz zakaat?, halal and haram things, treatment of POW?s, treatment with parents , neighbors , orphans and others, and the list goes on.
                                          At this point I would like to take you back to the beginning of Surah Al-Baqrah ayah 2
                                          22 This Book is the Guidance you asked for! There is absolutely no doubt concerning its authority and authenticity. This Divine Writ, Al-Qur?an, is a Monograph that finds its own way from your mind to your heart. And you will soon notice, as you proceed, that this Scripture leaves no lingering doubts in a sincere, seeking heart or mind. If you remember that this is a Book of Guidance, and hence, consult with it as such, the glittering reality will dawn upon you that this is a Beacon of Light! It is a Guide for all those who wish to journey through life in true honor and security. -------QXP
                                          ?La?raib? makes it clear that there is no physical or psychological doubt in this book.
                                          It?s a thing of common observation that in all the civilizations not all the human beings possessed same level of intellect and this applies not only to men of different era but also to the people who lived on the face of earth at the same time. Just look around you will see kids sitting in the same class room, being taught same syllabus by the same teacher end up in different ways, some achieve highest degrees of knowledge and some are left behind. The same phenomenon is observed towards the understanding of Quran. Quran was not meant to be only for certain time period but for all the generations and civilizations to come. This is why the Permanent values are described in easy and plain language. However the Abstract thoughts are explained in a language which is more complex and beautiful and this could be the only way to explain them. Did you ever come across any book of philosophy which could be understood equally by everyone and did not the author use allegorical language to explain certain things? Quran is a message for the human beings and the language was especially picked to make it easy to understand and last forever. Just for an example the literature produced by human is also not understood fully and uniformly by all the humans. There is an other aspect to this issue. Only Allah is ?Alimul Ghaib Washahadah?, His example is like someone sitting on the top of a hill able to see things on both sides of the hill but the people on the ground can see only whats visible to them. Therefore limitation of knowledge come to play and make certain ayah ?mutashabihaat? for us because we do not possess appropriate knowledge to understand them and with the advancement of knowledge those ayah which were ?mutashabihaat? first become ?muhkimaat? such as the scientific facts mentioned in Quran were hard to understand for the men of those times. Before Quran the design of solar system thought out by Greek philosophers and scientists was totally different, they thought Earth was at the center of the system and rest of planets were revolving around it including the sun.
                                          QXP
                                          3638 And the sun it runs its appointed course. That is the measure of the Almighty, the Knower.
                                          (The sun along with its system is moving to the Solar Apex, Constellation of Hercules, at a speed 150 miles per second, according to the current science).
                                          3639 And the moon We have measured for it phases until it becomes (a crescent) like an old curved date-stalk.
                                          3640 It is not for the sun to overtake the moon, nor can the night outrun the day. All of them swim along in their orbits. (The sun cannot cause the moon to gravitate towards itself and the night and the day cannot lengthen or shorten other than the appointed measure 2133, 2261, 2562, 3129, 4137, 576).
                                          3641 Another Sign for them is that We carry the Children of Adam on the loaded ship.
                                          3642 And We have created for them similar things to ride on. (And will create things of which you have no knowledge yet 16.
                                          These scientific facts could not be understood by the people of ancient times and hence these ayah were mutashabihaat for them but for us have become muhkimaat. Even now these ayah are muhkimaat for only ?Rasikhoon fil Ilm and there are many who are unable to understand because they have not acquired enough scientific knowledge. Therefore an ayah can be a muhkim and mutashabih at the same time for people of different intellectual level. See the example below
                                          QXP
                                          4229 And among His Signs is the creative design of the Heavens and the Earth, and the living creatures which He has dispersed throughout them. And He is Able to gather them together when He will. (Herein is an allusion to the existence of life in other celestial bodies, and to man meeting with the 'aliens' some day 1649).

                                          This ayah was in the category of Mutashabih when science had not probed into the outer space but for ?rasikhoon fil ilm? of today has become a muhkim ayah.
                                          This helps conclude that one meaning of mutashabihaat is a category of ayah whose understanding depends on the level of knowledge and advancement of knowledge puts them in the category of muhkimaat.
                                          There is an other category of Mutashabihaat which is purely allegorical such as
                                          QXP
                                          423 The following women are prohibited for you in marriage Your mothers, daughters, sisters, father's sisters, mother's sisters, brother's daughters, sister's daughters, foster-mothers who have ever nursed you, foster-sisters, your wives' mothers, your step-daughters unless you have divorced their mother without being intimate with her. Also forbidden are women who have ever been the wives of your sons. You are not allowed to keep two sisters in wedlock at one time except what has already happened in the past. Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.
                                          Here in this ayah the word ?ummahaatukum? is used in its literal meaning but in 3/6 ?hunna ummul kitbay? is used allegorically. Similarly
                                          754 Verily, your Sustainer is Allah Who has created the heavens and the earth in six stages, and is established on the Throne of His Almightiness (103, 132). He draws the night over the day, each seeking the other in rapid succession. The sun, the moon, the stars are committed to serve by His Command. Listen and remember, to Him belongs the World of Creation, and to Him belongs the World of Command. Exalted, He is the Lord of the Worlds.
                                          This ?THRONE? and Allah sitting on His throne is not like a Mughal or Roman king sitting on his throne. Throne is the symbol of Power or Authority and it would be interpreted as Allah has the authority over everything.
                                          2130 Are the unbelievers not aware (after this proclamation) that the heavens and the earth used to be one solid mass that We exploded into parting? And that out of water We made every living thing? Will they not, then, acknowledge the Truth?
                                          This is another example of Mutashabihaat for those who are not ?Rasikhoon fil ilm? or those who are not ?allazeen ootul kitaab? or ?oolilalbaab?. But for those men of knowledge this ayah is muhkim?.We still know a little about how the life came into being and how Allah exercised his Power to create life, so that part is still not very much understood and will be considered as Mutashabihah.
                                          We either don?t know at this level of intellect or have little knowledge and there are certain things which will remain un-understood even to the last man of this system because its not possible for human beings to have a full understanding of something what?s not material.
                                          1785 (O Messenger) They ask you about the (Spirit, the Soul), the Revelation. Tell them, ?Revelation is from your Lord's World of Command, of which you have been given little knowledge.? The Spirit is the Divine Energy, something from which has been given to humans in the form of free will. The Soul is your "Self".
                                          Therefore, Mutashabihah are of two kinds
                                          1-Those which are purely allegorical like Hand of Allah, Throne of Allah, Ummul kitaab etc
                                          2-Those for which you need ample knowledge to understand the reality such life in outer space, solar system, creation of first life etc etc.
                                          Lets see few more ayah which tells us that Quran is all ?muhkimaat? and also at an other point all ? mutashabihaat?.
                                          Continued
                                          I will explain it further in the next post
                                          Regards
                                          taseer

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users