Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. The 3:7 Challenge to Arnold Yasin

The 3:7 Challenge to Arnold Yasin

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
32 Posts 4 Posters 80 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    phoenix1
    wrote on last edited by
    #17

    peace Ahmed,

    take your time bro, I'm in no hurry.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • A Offline
      A Offline
      arnoldyasin
      wrote on last edited by
      #18

      Peace,

      AB, not all of your answers are good, but there is no need for me to answer them, as somebody has given me the exact answer i was looking for. So i agree with AB conclusion. I first didn't accept this translation, because people couldn't answer some questions about the logic behind it, now i got those answers. I first have to ask i can post them on the forum, so we have to wait for that. But it was not only the arabic that convinced but me also the answer related to it.

      Like i said, i'm no arabic expert, but i have studied a lot, not to be satisfied with simple answers. But AB, you're right, i will not intervene no more before i have good answers. But on this issue i accepted an article which gave good answers i thought. That is why i answered phoenix then.

      Peace

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • P Offline
        P Offline
        phoenix1
        wrote on last edited by
        #19

        peace arnold,

        may I have a look at the article?

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • A Offline
          A Offline
          arnoldyasin
          wrote on last edited by
          #20

          This is what Ayman gave as answer to me which answered all my questions

          003.007
          YUSUFALI He it is Who has sent down to thee the Book In it are verses
          basic or fundamental (of established meaning); they are the foundation
          of the Book others are allegorical. But those in whose hearts is
          perversity follow the part thereof that is allegorical, seeking discord,
          and searching for its hidden meanings, but no one knows its hidden
          meanings except Allah. And those who are firmly grounded in knowledge
          say "We believe in the Book; the whole of it is from our Lord" and
          none will grasp the Message except men of understanding.
          PICKTHAL He it is Who hath revealed unto thee (Muhammad) the Scripture
          wherein are clear revelations - they are the substance of the Book - and
          others (which are) allegorical. But those in whose hearts is doubt
          pursue, forsooth, that which is allegorical seeking (to cause)
          dissension by seeking to explain it. None knoweth its explanation save
          Allah. And those who are of sound instruction say We believe therein;
          the whole is from our Lord; but only men of understanding really heed.
          SHAKIR He it is Who has revealed the Book to you; some of its verses
          are decisive, they are the basis of the Book, and others are
          allegorical; then as for those in whose hearts there is perversity they
          follow the part of it which is allegorical, seeking to mislead and
          seeking to give it (their own) interpretation. but none knows its
          interpretation except Allah, and those who are firmly rooted in
          knowledge say We believe in it, it is all from our Lord; and none do
          mind except those having understanding.
          KHALIFA He sent down to you this scripture, containing straightforward
          verses - which constitute the essence of the scripture - as well as
          multiple-meaning or allegorical verses. Those who harbor doubts in their
          hearts will pursue the multiple-meaning verses to create confusion, and
          to extricate a certain meaning. None knows the true meaning thereof
          except GOD and those well founded in knowledge. They say, "We believe in
          this - all of it comes from our Lord." Only those who possess
          intelligence will take heed.

          The "waw" can be used both to separate a new sentence and for addition
          (similar to an English "and&quot. We find examples of both types of usages
          in the great reading. So only looking at the "waw" doesn't tell us
          enough information to decide either way. So we need to look at other
          info in the passage. When we look at the rest of the passage we see that
          the verb coming after "those who are firmly grounded in knowledge" is
          the verb "say" in the plural ("yaquloon&quot. Now notice how all
          translators above, except for Khalifa, correctly don't put the pronoun
          "hum" (they) before "yaquloon" and they just replicate the exact Arabic
          sentence as "those who are firmly grounded in knowledge say". Only
          Khalifa is forced to put the pronoun "they" before "say", which is
          non-existent in the Arabic original, to make the passage work. This is
          for the simple reason that Khalifa knew very well that not putting the
          "they" in front of "say" and adding "those well founded in knowledge" to
          GOD would result in "GOD and those well founded in knowledge say".
          Since, clearly the sentence "We believe in this - all of it comes from
          our Lord" cannot be uttered by The God, then he needed to change the
          words and insert a pronoun that is not in the original Arabic. The other
          translators didn't have to do that because they ended the sentence
          before the "waw". So in this case, the evidence from the passage itself
          leans heavily towards the "waw" being used as a sentence separator as
          opposed to for addition.

          More evidence is in the word "taawil" itself. I don't think that any of
          the translators really did a good job in translating this key word. The
          word comes from "awal" which means "original/first/ultimate". So it is
          not just any meaning/understanding/interpretation but it is the
          original/first/ultimate meaning/understanding/interpretation. Now this
          type of meaning can only be known to the author of the text that is
          subject to interpretation. This is true even for human authors. For
          example, you can understand and interpret what an author means in a
          novel but maybe you don't know that he or she based this passage on a
          childhood experience or a certain likes and dislikes, etc. Essentially,
          you would heve to delve into the psyche of the human author to know the
          original/first/ultimate meaning/understanding/interpretation. Of course,
          this is impossible.

          Other passages of the great reading confirm this understanding. You see
          the same word in 753. It is addressing those who are waiting or expect
          the original/first/ultimate meaning/understanding/interpretation. The
          passage says that when the actual original/first/ultimate
          meaning/understanding/interpretation comes, it will be on the day of the
          account and by then it will be too late.

          Look around you and empirically verify the right path by comparing it to
          the path of the stayers (16-7). You will see that the people who think
          that they have the original/first/ultimate
          meaning/understanding/interpretation have stopped trying to get closer
          to the truth. They are misguided and not progressing. If you or I
          thought that we had the original/first/ultimate
          meaning/understanding/interpretation, then we wouldn't be here today. It
          is only those who are firmly grounded in reality that know that what we
          know is far less than what we don't know. This is true about all of The
          God's signs in the universe and not just in the great reading.

          I think that 37 and 7431 are linked together by 226. Here is my
          translation of those passages

          1. He is the one who descended on you the book. From it are judging
            signs that are the origin of the book, and others that are allegorical.
            So in the case of
            (1) Those in whose hearts there is blurriness, they pursue what is
            allegorical from it (the book) desiring the "fitna"/trial/affliction and
            desiring its (what is allegorical from the book) original
            interpretation. And none knows its (what is allegorical from the book)
            original interpretation except The God. And,
            (2) Those who are firmly grounded in knowledge say "We have faith in it
            (the book), both (types of signs) are from our Lord."
            And none remembers other than those with intellects.

          2. The God does not shy away from citing any kind of allegory, from a
            mosquito to what is greater. As for those who have faith, they know that
            it is the truth from their Lord. As for those who are unappreciative,
            they say, "What did The God mean by such an allegory misleading many
            thereby and guiding many thereby?" But He never misleads thereby except
            the wicked.

          3. And we didn't make the owners/companions of the Fire except
            controllers; and
            We didn't make their count except as a "fitna"/trial/affliction for
            those who have been unappreciative;
            so that
            (1) those who were given the book be sure, those who had faith increase
            in faith and those who were given the book and those who had faith do
            not have doubt.
            And, so that
            (2) those in whose hearts there is sickness and the unappreciative say
            "What did The God want with this example?" Like this The God misguides
            whom He wills and guides whom He wills.
            And none knows your Lord's soldiers except Him.
            And it is nothing except a reminder for the humans.

          I hope that you can see those connections.

          Peace and all best wishes,

          Ayman

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • U Offline
            U Offline
            unknownuser
            wrote on last edited by
            #21

            Peace arnoldyasin. So what is the new translation of this important verse,and what are the implications?

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • K Offline
              K Offline
              KGB
              wrote on last edited by
              #22

              What I understand after reading Ayman reply is that he agree with Ahmed Bahgat.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • A Offline
                A Offline
                arnoldyasin
                wrote on last edited by
                #23

                Yes, he agrees with AB, and me too now.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • K Offline
                  K Offline
                  KGB
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #24

                  So the purpose of this topic reached a happy conclusion. I am glad to see mutual agreement and understanding of the verse.

                  Thanks to Ahmed Bahgat and Ayman.

                  Sadiqi I pray for your father health and wish you and your family a safe journey.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • P Offline
                    P Offline
                    phoenix1
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #25

                    peace

                    Great answer by Ayman. Cleared a lot of things up.
                    I Agree with Mr.Bahgat now ) His explanation I still don't understand, though.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • U Offline
                      U Offline
                      unknownuser
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #26

                      Thank you all

                      I'm just puzzled where is brother Ayman comment?

                      I'm very interested to read it

                      thanks

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • P Offline
                        P Offline
                        phoenix1
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #27

                        peace AB, below is Ayman's answer as posted by Arnoldyasin. I don't know what it answers or where he got it from confused ) but it makes sense.

                        003.007
                        YUSUFALI He it is Who has sent down to thee the Book In it are verses
                        basic or fundamental (of established meaning); they are the foundation
                        of the Book others are allegorical. But those in whose hearts is
                        perversity follow the part thereof that is allegorical, seeking discord,
                        and searching for its hidden meanings, but no one knows its hidden
                        meanings except Allah. And those who are firmly grounded in knowledge
                        say "We believe in the Book; the whole of it is from our Lord" and
                        none will grasp the Message except men of understanding.
                        PICKTHAL He it is Who hath revealed unto thee (Muhammad) the Scripture
                        wherein are clear revelations - they are the substance of the Book - and
                        others (which are) allegorical. But those in whose hearts is doubt
                        pursue, forsooth, that which is allegorical seeking (to cause)
                        dissension by seeking to explain it. None knoweth its explanation save
                        Allah. And those who are of sound instruction say We believe therein;
                        the whole is from our Lord; but only men of understanding really heed.
                        SHAKIR He it is Who has revealed the Book to you; some of its verses
                        are decisive, they are the basis of the Book, and others are
                        allegorical; then as for those in whose hearts there is perversity they
                        follow the part of it which is allegorical, seeking to mislead and
                        seeking to give it (their own) interpretation. but none knows its
                        interpretation except Allah, and those who are firmly rooted in
                        knowledge say We believe in it, it is all from our Lord; and none do
                        mind except those having understanding.
                        KHALIFA He sent down to you this scripture, containing straightforward
                        verses - which constitute the essence of the scripture - as well as
                        multiple-meaning or allegorical verses. Those who harbor doubts in their
                        hearts will pursue the multiple-meaning verses to create confusion, and
                        to extricate a certain meaning. None knows the true meaning thereof
                        except GOD and those well founded in knowledge. They say, "We believe in
                        this - all of it comes from our Lord." Only those who possess
                        intelligence will take heed.

                        The "waw" can be used both to separate a new sentence and for addition
                        (similar to an English "and&quot. We find examples of both types of usages
                        in the great reading. So only looking at the "waw" doesn't tell us
                        enough information to decide either way. So we need to look at other
                        info in the passage. When we look at the rest of the passage we see that
                        the verb coming after "those who are firmly grounded in knowledge" is
                        the verb "say" in the plural ("yaquloon&quot. Now notice how all
                        translators above, except for Khalifa, correctly don't put the pronoun
                        "hum" (they) before "yaquloon" and they just replicate the exact Arabic
                        sentence as "those who are firmly grounded in knowledge say". Only
                        Khalifa is forced to put the pronoun "they" before "say", which is
                        non-existent in the Arabic original, to make the passage work. This is
                        for the simple reason that Khalifa knew very well that not putting the
                        "they" in front of "say" and adding "those well founded in knowledge" to
                        GOD would result in "GOD and those well founded in knowledge say".
                        Since, clearly the sentence "We believe in this - all of it comes from
                        our Lord" cannot be uttered by The God, then he needed to change the
                        words and insert a pronoun that is not in the original Arabic. The other
                        translators didn't have to do that because they ended the sentence
                        before the "waw". So in this case, the evidence from the passage itself
                        leans heavily towards the "waw" being used as a sentence separator as
                        opposed to for addition.

                        More evidence is in the word "taawil" itself. I don't think that any of
                        the translators really did a good job in translating this key word. The
                        word comes from "awal" which means "original/first/ultimate". So it is
                        not just any meaning/understanding/interpretation but it is the
                        original/first/ultimate meaning/understanding/interpretation. Now this
                        type of meaning can only be known to the author of the text that is
                        subject to interpretation. This is true even for human authors. For
                        example, you can understand and interpret what an author means in a
                        novel but maybe you don't know that he or she based this passage on a
                        childhood experience or a certain likes and dislikes, etc. Essentially,
                        you would heve to delve into the psyche of the human author to know the
                        original/first/ultimate meaning/understanding/interpretation. Of course,
                        this is impossible.

                        Other passages of the great reading confirm this understanding. You see
                        the same word in 753. It is addressing those who are waiting or expect
                        the original/first/ultimate meaning/understanding/interpretation. The
                        passage says that when the actual original/first/ultimate
                        meaning/understanding/interpretation comes, it will be on the day of the
                        account and by then it will be too late.

                        Look around you and empirically verify the right path by comparing it to
                        the path of the stayers (16-7). You will see that the people who think
                        that they have the original/first/ultimate
                        meaning/understanding/interpretation have stopped trying to get closer
                        to the truth. They are misguided and not progressing. If you or I
                        thought that we had the original/first/ultimate
                        meaning/understanding/interpretation, then we wouldn't be here today. It
                        is only those who are firmly grounded in reality that know that what we
                        know is far less than what we don't know. This is true about all of The
                        God's signs in the universe and not just in the great reading.

                        I think that 37 and 7431 are linked together by 226. Here is my
                        translation of those passages

                        1. He is the one who descended on you the book. From it are judging
                          signs that are the origin of the book, and others that are allegorical.
                          So in the case of
                          (1) Those in whose hearts there is blurriness, they pursue what is
                          allegorical from it (the book) desiring the "fitna"/trial/affliction and
                          desiring its (what is allegorical from the book) original
                          interpretation. And none knows its (what is allegorical from the book)
                          original interpretation except The God. And,
                          (2) Those who are firmly grounded in knowledge say "We have faith in it
                          (the book), both (types of signs) are from our Lord."
                          And none remembers other than those with intellects.

                        2. The God does not shy away from citing any kind of allegory, from a
                          mosquito to what is greater. As for those who have faith, they know that
                          it is the truth from their Lord. As for those who are unappreciative,
                          they say, "What did The God mean by such an allegory misleading many
                          thereby and guiding many thereby?" But He never misleads thereby except
                          the wicked.

                        3. And we didn't make the owners/companions of the Fire except
                          controllers; and
                          We didn't make their count except as a "fitna"/trial/affliction for
                          those who have been unappreciative;
                          so that
                          (1) those who were given the book be sure, those who had faith increase
                          in faith and those who were given the book and those who had faith do
                          not have doubt.
                          And, so that
                          (2) those in whose hearts there is sickness and the unappreciative say
                          "What did The God want with this example?" Like this The God misguides
                          whom He wills and guides whom He wills.
                          And none knows your Lord's soldiers except Him.
                          And it is nothing except a reminder for the humans.

                        I hope that you can see those connections.

                        Peace and all best wishes,

                        Ayman

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • U Offline
                          U Offline
                          unknownuser
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #28

                          Thank you phonix

                          it feels good when muslims agree together

                          cheers

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • P Offline
                            P Offline
                            phoenix1
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #29

                            peace Ahmed,

                            it does. sun

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • U Offline
                              U Offline
                              unknownuser
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #30

                              peace Ahmed,

                              it does. sun

                              I will take the chance and say sorry to arnold as i didn't notice that he was the one that posted Ayman comment, i left the thread for a day and today looked at the last comments then tried to see where is Ayman comment but could not find it so i asked my question pre maturaly I guess, but thanks for the help

                              cheers

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • U Offline
                                U Offline
                                unknownuser
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #31

                                peace

                                for those who couldn't see it

                                This is Ayman's tralnslation of verse 37

                                1. He is the one who descended on you the book. From it are judging
                                  signs that are the origin of the book, and others that are allegorical.
                                  So in the case of
                                  (1) Those in whose hearts there is blurriness, they pursue what is
                                  allegorical from it (the book) desiring the "fitna"/trial/affliction and
                                  desiring its (what is allegorical from the book) original
                                  interpretation. And none knows its (what is allegorical from the book)
                                  original interpretation except The God. And,
                                  (2) Those who are firmly grounded in knowledge say "We have faith in it
                                  (the book), both (types of signs) are from our Lord."
                                  And none remembers other than those with intellects.

                                Completely agree w/ it. Makes A lot more sense. And Thanks to Ayman

                                God bless

                                God is the Greatest !

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • A Offline
                                  A Offline
                                  arnoldyasin
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #32

                                  Peace,

                                  Someone sended me this also, plus i got the mail from Ayman through personal contact.

                                  Mutashabihaat , Mukimaat

                                  003.007
                                  YUSUFALI He it is Who has sent down to thee the Book In it are verses basic or fundamental (of established meaning); they are the foundation of the Book others are allegorical. But those in whose hearts is perversity follow the part thereof that is allegorical, seeking discord, and searching for its hidden meanings, but no one knows its hidden meanings except Allah. And those who are firmly grounded in knowledge say "We believe in the Book; the whole of it is from our Lord" and none will grasp the Message except men of understanding.
                                  PICKTHAL He it is Who hath revealed unto thee (Muhammad) the Scripture wherein are clear revelations - they are the substance of the Book - and others (which are) allegorical. But those in whose hearts is doubt pursue, forsooth, that which is allegorical seeking (to cause) dissension by seeking to explain it. None knoweth its explanation save Allah. And those who are of sound instruction say We believe therein; the whole is from our Lord; but only men of understanding really heed.
                                  SHAKIR He it is Who has revealed the Book to you; some of its verses are decisive, they are the basis of the Book, and others are allegorical; then as for those in whose hearts there is perversity they follow the part of it which is allegorical, seeking to mislead and seeking to give it (their own) interpretation. but none knows its interpretation except Allah, and those who are firmly rooted in knowledge say We believe in it, it is all from our Lord; and none do mind except those having understanding.

                                  This ayah explains that there are two different kind of ayah in Quran, one Muhkimaat and the other Mutashabihaat. Generally speaking all the ayah which have guidelines mandatory to live in a harmonious way in a society are in the category of Mukimaat and one does not get confused and there are no other meaning which one could invent such as ?atee uz zakaat?, halal and haram things, treatment of POW?s, treatment with parents , neighbors , orphans and others, and the list goes on.
                                  At this point I would like to take you back to the beginning of Surah Al-Baqrah ayah 2
                                  22 This Book is the Guidance you asked for! There is absolutely no doubt concerning its authority and authenticity. This Divine Writ, Al-Qur?an, is a Monograph that finds its own way from your mind to your heart. And you will soon notice, as you proceed, that this Scripture leaves no lingering doubts in a sincere, seeking heart or mind. If you remember that this is a Book of Guidance, and hence, consult with it as such, the glittering reality will dawn upon you that this is a Beacon of Light! It is a Guide for all those who wish to journey through life in true honor and security. -------QXP
                                  ?La?raib? makes it clear that there is no physical or psychological doubt in this book.
                                  It?s a thing of common observation that in all the civilizations not all the human beings possessed same level of intellect and this applies not only to men of different era but also to the people who lived on the face of earth at the same time. Just look around you will see kids sitting in the same class room, being taught same syllabus by the same teacher end up in different ways, some achieve highest degrees of knowledge and some are left behind. The same phenomenon is observed towards the understanding of Quran. Quran was not meant to be only for certain time period but for all the generations and civilizations to come. This is why the Permanent values are described in easy and plain language. However the Abstract thoughts are explained in a language which is more complex and beautiful and this could be the only way to explain them. Did you ever come across any book of philosophy which could be understood equally by everyone and did not the author use allegorical language to explain certain things? Quran is a message for the human beings and the language was especially picked to make it easy to understand and last forever. Just for an example the literature produced by human is also not understood fully and uniformly by all the humans. There is an other aspect to this issue. Only Allah is ?Alimul Ghaib Washahadah?, His example is like someone sitting on the top of a hill able to see things on both sides of the hill but the people on the ground can see only whats visible to them. Therefore limitation of knowledge come to play and make certain ayah ?mutashabihaat? for us because we do not possess appropriate knowledge to understand them and with the advancement of knowledge those ayah which were ?mutashabihaat? first become ?muhkimaat? such as the scientific facts mentioned in Quran were hard to understand for the men of those times. Before Quran the design of solar system thought out by Greek philosophers and scientists was totally different, they thought Earth was at the center of the system and rest of planets were revolving around it including the sun.
                                  QXP
                                  3638 And the sun it runs its appointed course. That is the measure of the Almighty, the Knower.
                                  (The sun along with its system is moving to the Solar Apex, Constellation of Hercules, at a speed 150 miles per second, according to the current science).
                                  3639 And the moon We have measured for it phases until it becomes (a crescent) like an old curved date-stalk.
                                  3640 It is not for the sun to overtake the moon, nor can the night outrun the day. All of them swim along in their orbits. (The sun cannot cause the moon to gravitate towards itself and the night and the day cannot lengthen or shorten other than the appointed measure 2133, 2261, 2562, 3129, 4137, 576).
                                  3641 Another Sign for them is that We carry the Children of Adam on the loaded ship.
                                  3642 And We have created for them similar things to ride on. (And will create things of which you have no knowledge yet 16.
                                  These scientific facts could not be understood by the people of ancient times and hence these ayah were mutashabihaat for them but for us have become muhkimaat. Even now these ayah are muhkimaat for only ?Rasikhoon fil Ilm and there are many who are unable to understand because they have not acquired enough scientific knowledge. Therefore an ayah can be a muhkim and mutashabih at the same time for people of different intellectual level. See the example below
                                  QXP
                                  4229 And among His Signs is the creative design of the Heavens and the Earth, and the living creatures which He has dispersed throughout them. And He is Able to gather them together when He will. (Herein is an allusion to the existence of life in other celestial bodies, and to man meeting with the 'aliens' some day 1649).

                                  This ayah was in the category of Mutashabih when science had not probed into the outer space but for ?rasikhoon fil ilm? of today has become a muhkim ayah.
                                  This helps conclude that one meaning of mutashabihaat is a category of ayah whose understanding depends on the level of knowledge and advancement of knowledge puts them in the category of muhkimaat.
                                  There is an other category of Mutashabihaat which is purely allegorical such as
                                  QXP
                                  423 The following women are prohibited for you in marriage Your mothers, daughters, sisters, father's sisters, mother's sisters, brother's daughters, sister's daughters, foster-mothers who have ever nursed you, foster-sisters, your wives' mothers, your step-daughters unless you have divorced their mother without being intimate with her. Also forbidden are women who have ever been the wives of your sons. You are not allowed to keep two sisters in wedlock at one time except what has already happened in the past. Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.
                                  Here in this ayah the word ?ummahaatukum? is used in its literal meaning but in 3/6 ?hunna ummul kitbay? is used allegorically. Similarly
                                  754 Verily, your Sustainer is Allah Who has created the heavens and the earth in six stages, and is established on the Throne of His Almightiness (103, 132). He draws the night over the day, each seeking the other in rapid succession. The sun, the moon, the stars are committed to serve by His Command. Listen and remember, to Him belongs the World of Creation, and to Him belongs the World of Command. Exalted, He is the Lord of the Worlds.
                                  This ?THRONE? and Allah sitting on His throne is not like a Mughal or Roman king sitting on his throne. Throne is the symbol of Power or Authority and it would be interpreted as Allah has the authority over everything.
                                  2130 Are the unbelievers not aware (after this proclamation) that the heavens and the earth used to be one solid mass that We exploded into parting? And that out of water We made every living thing? Will they not, then, acknowledge the Truth?
                                  This is another example of Mutashabihaat for those who are not ?Rasikhoon fil ilm? or those who are not ?allazeen ootul kitaab? or ?oolilalbaab?. But for those men of knowledge this ayah is muhkim?.We still know a little about how the life came into being and how Allah exercised his Power to create life, so that part is still not very much understood and will be considered as Mutashabihah.
                                  We either don?t know at this level of intellect or have little knowledge and there are certain things which will remain un-understood even to the last man of this system because its not possible for human beings to have a full understanding of something what?s not material.
                                  1785 (O Messenger) They ask you about the (Spirit, the Soul), the Revelation. Tell them, ?Revelation is from your Lord's World of Command, of which you have been given little knowledge.? The Spirit is the Divine Energy, something from which has been given to humans in the form of free will. The Soul is your "Self".
                                  Therefore, Mutashabihah are of two kinds
                                  1-Those which are purely allegorical like Hand of Allah, Throne of Allah, Ummul kitaab etc
                                  2-Those for which you need ample knowledge to understand the reality such life in outer space, solar system, creation of first life etc etc.
                                  Lets see few more ayah which tells us that Quran is all ?muhkimaat? and also at an other point all ? mutashabihaat?.
                                  Continued
                                  I will explain it further in the next post
                                  Regards
                                  taseer

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  Reply
                                  • Reply as topic
                                  Log in to reply
                                  • Oldest to Newest
                                  • Newest to Oldest
                                  • Most Votes


                                  • Login

                                  • Don't have an account? Register

                                  • Login or register to search.
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  0
                                  • Categories
                                  • Recent
                                  • Users