Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. General Issues / Questions
  4. Gelatin & Additives

Gelatin & Additives

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Issues / Questions
69 Posts 13 Posters 2.2k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • E Offline
    E Offline
    No longer a Sunna-rejecter
    wrote on last edited by
    #38

    Peace. Sorry for late reply and short on words. I am currently on mobile. You can find LAHM TWARIYAN mentioned in two verses of the quran at 1614 and 3512

    To outline my point on this. We do not get only pure flesh that we eat from rivers and seas. I mean these animals also got entrails and so on. We do eat the eggs of fishes which are often found inside them. There is also the famous and well known CAVIAR! And its not flesh but the eggs which are found inside the fish. If LAHM TWARIYAN would mean only sure flesh and muscle tissue, then eggs, entrails etc would become unlawful for eating which is not the case.

    May Allah guide us all.

    1614 Wahuwa allathee sakhkhara albahralita/kuloo minhu lahman tariyyan watastakhrijoominhu hilyatan talbasoonaha watara alfulkamawakhira feehi walitabtaghoo min fadlihiwalaAAallakum tashkuroona

    1614 He is the One who committed the sea, that you may eat from it tender meat, and that you may extract from it pearls that you wear. You see the ships flowing through it, so that you may seek from His bounty, and that you may be thankful.

    3512 Wama yastawee albahranihatha AAathbun furatun sa-ighun sharabuhuwahatha milhun ojajun wamin kullinta/kuloona lahman tariyyan watastakhrijoona hilyatantalbasoonaha watara alfulka feehi mawakhiralitabtaghoo min fadlihi walaAAallakum tashkuroona

    3512 Nor are the two seas the same. One is fresh and palatable, good to drink, while the other is salty and bitter. From each of them you eat tender meat, and you extract jewelry to wear. You see the ships sailing through them, seeking His provisions; and perhaps you may be appreciative.

    What you dont understand is that THRERE IS NO PROHIBITION IN THOSE VERSES. God says that we MAY/DO eat the flesh of fish. There is, however NO PROHIBITION. Therefore, it is unnecessary to meantion caviar.

    The verses are totally different from 6145 where it says that the meat of pigs is PROHIBITED.

    Peace

    I am no longer a Sunna-rejecter. See 4:59-65, 62:2-4, 3:31, 4:156, 7:157 Messenger teaches and is to be followed and obeyed. Examples of revelation received which is not in the Qur'an: 3:123-126, 33:37, 2:187, 66:3, 62:9.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • S Offline
      S Offline
      SwedenMajidah
      wrote on last edited by
      #39

      Salam,

      Gelatine made from bones and skins from animals are sterile because it is boiled in high temperature and are processed in factories to get those gelatine leaves or powder. You cannot get virus for eating gelatine but brains and flesh and blood from especially pig can contain viruses and worms etc.

      Maria

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • N Offline
        N Offline
        nsws1988
        wrote on last edited by
        #40

        Salam,

        Gelatine made from bones and skins from animals are sterile because it is boiled in high temperature and are processed in factories to get those gelatine leaves or powder. You cannot get virus for eating gelatine but brains and flesh and blood from especially pig can contain viruses and worms etc.

        Maria

        Peace,

        What if pig flesh is boiled at the same high temperatures? Does it make it sterile?

        God bless

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • W Offline
          W Offline
          WayFinder
          wrote on last edited by
          #41

          1614 Wahuwa allathee sakhkhara albahralita/kuloo minhu lahman tariyyan watastakhrijoominhu hilyatan talbasoonaha watara alfulkamawakhira feehi walitabtaghoo min fadlihiwalaAAallakum tashkuroona

          1614 He is the One who committed the sea, that you may eat from it tender meat, and that you may extract from it pearls that you wear. You see the ships flowing through it, so that you may seek from His bounty, and that you may be thankful.

          3512 Wama yastawee albahranihatha AAathbun furatun sa-ighun sharabuhuwahatha milhun ojajun wamin kullinta/kuloona lahman tariyyan watastakhrijoona hilyatantalbasoonaha watara alfulka feehi mawakhiralitabtaghoo min fadlihi walaAAallakum tashkuroona

          3512 Nor are the two seas the same. One is fresh and palatable, good to drink, while the other is salty and bitter. From each of them you eat tender meat, and you extract jewelry to wear. You see the ships sailing through them, seeking His provisions; and perhaps you may be appreciative.

          What you dont understand is that THRERE IS NO PROHIBITION IN THOSE VERSES. God says that we MAY/DO eat the flesh of fish. There is, however NO PROHIBITION. Therefore, it is unnecessary to meantion caviar.

          The verses are totally different from 6145 where it says that the meat of pigs is PROHIBITED.

          Peace

          Any idea why Allah used the word LAHM and not the word HOOT which means fish?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • S Offline
            S Offline
            savage_carrot
            wrote on last edited by
            #42

            Probably because scallops are quite sweet and tender... crab and lobster meat too. Don't know about mussels, they seem icky.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • N Offline
              N Offline
              nsws1988
              wrote on last edited by
              #43

              Probably because scallops are quite sweet and tender... crab and lobster meat too. Don't know about mussels, they seem icky.

              Mussels are chewy

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • D Offline
                D Offline
                Diem
                wrote on last edited by
                #44

                Peace
                Brain cannot be included in flesh through any parameter.Embryologically ,Physiologically ,histologically,or Linguisitically ,the brain is a different thing from the flesh.
                He should not put them together.
                Regards

                Flesh, as in muscle, is completely different from the brain, so I agree with you competely.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • W Offline
                  W Offline
                  WayFinder
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #45

                  Salaamun Alaykum,

                  This is indeed an interesting topic... So far we have to options before us

                  1. The whole pig stuff as well as derivatives is haraam (my opinion)
                  2. Only pure flesh/muscle tissue is haraam, the rest becomes automatically halaal like the fat,bones,brains, entrails etc...

                  I got a new point to add to my argument...

                  Let us look at this verse

                  6146 For those who are Jewish, We forbade all that have claws; and from the cattle and the sheep We forbade their fat except what is attached to the back, or entrails, or mixed with bone. That is a punishment for their rebellion, and We are truthful.

                  Pay special attention to the prohibition and how it is detailed...

                  Now let us look at the prior verse which talk about pig

                  6145 Say, "I do not find in what was revealed to me anything prohibited for any eater unless it is (1) carrion, (2) running blood, (3) the meat of pigs (Lahm al khinzeer), for it is unclean, and (4) meat blasphemously dedicated to other than God." If one is forced to eat these without being malicious or deliberate, then your Lord is Forgiver, Most Merciful.

                  So, let us assume that bones or entrails were OK for us to consume, should not the prohibition be detailed the same way as it was done on the 6146?? For example Forbidden is the flesh of swine except those which are mixed with the bones and the entrails.

                  Because it is very obvious that there are pieces of flesh left overs stuck on the bones and the entrails which cannot be removed when doing a normal slaughtering and no especial machinery/process is involved.

                  The original poster does not seem to be interesting in the topic anymore )

                  Hope to hear back.

                  Allah knows best.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • N Offline
                    N Offline
                    nsws1988
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #46

                    6145 Say, "I do not find in what was revealed to me anything prohibited for any eater unless it is (1) carrion, (2) running blood, (3) the meat of pigs (Lahm al khinzeer), for it is unclean, and (4) meat blasphemously dedicated to other than God." If one is forced to eat these without being malicious or deliberate, then your Lord is Forgiver, Most Merciful.

                    Peace

                    Isn't 'laham' / flesh specific enough? If the whole pig was forbidden then there would be no need for the word 'laham'.

                    Here is what I wrote before...

                    Here God says "We forbade all that have claws", not the MEAT of those with claws. Meaning the whole of the animal is prohibited.
                    But when God tells us to not eat the flesh of the pig, He is being specific to the flesh. The same when He is prohibiting the fat of cattle and sheep to the Jews. Also, when prohibiting the fat, God further specifies what fat is OK.

                    God bless

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • W Offline
                      W Offline
                      WayFinder
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #47

                      Peace

                      Isn't 'laham' / flesh specific enough? If the whole pig was forbidden then there would be no need for the word 'laham'.

                      Here is what I wrote before...

                      Here God says "We forbade all that have claws", not the MEAT of those with claws. Meaning the whole of the animal is prohibited.
                      But when God tells us to not eat the flesh of the pig, He is being specific to the flesh. The same when He is prohibiting the fat of cattle and sheep to the Jews. Also, when prohibiting the fat, God further specifies what fat is OK.

                      God bless

                      Read my earlier post again... God does not specify what Fat is ok, but He rather made it clear that he is making the task easy for the people, so that they do not get in lots of difficulties by trying to remove the fat stuck on the bones and entrails.

                      However, according to your logic...

                      Brains, entrails, bones, fat, gelatin of pigs are halaal... right?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • E Offline
                        E Offline
                        No longer a Sunna-rejecter
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #48

                        Salaamun Alaykum,

                        This is indeed an interesting topic... So far we have to options before us

                        1. The whole pig stuff as well as derivatives is haraam (my opinion)
                        2. Only pure flesh/muscle tissue is haraam, the rest becomes automatically halaal like the fat,bones,brains, entrails etc...

                        Dont agree with you.. you forgot my opinion, which is that the fat is OK but not the brain.

                        6145 Say, "I do not find in what was revealed to me anything prohibited for any eater unless it is (1) carrion, (2) running blood, (3) the meat of pigs (Lahm al khinzeer), for it is unclean, and (4) meat blasphemously dedicated to other than God." If one is forced to eat these without being malicious or deliberate, then your Lord is Forgiver, Most Merciful.

                        So, let us assume that bones or entrails were OK for us to consume, should not the prohibition be detailed the same way as it was done on the 6146?? For example Forbidden is the flesh of swine except those which are mixed with the bones and the entrails.

                        Because it is very obvious that there are pieces of flesh left overs stuck on the bones and the entrails which cannot be removed when doing a normal slaughtering and no especial machinery/process is involved.

                        You see..that's my point. Since the flesh is attached we cannot eat it.

                        I am no longer a Sunna-rejecter. See 4:59-65, 62:2-4, 3:31, 4:156, 7:157 Messenger teaches and is to be followed and obeyed. Examples of revelation received which is not in the Qur'an: 3:123-126, 33:37, 2:187, 66:3, 62:9.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • E Offline
                          E Offline
                          No longer a Sunna-rejecter
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #49

                          Any idea why Allah used the word LAHM and not the word HOOT which means fish?

                          Why should God only say "fish"? There are also crabs and other things. Anyways, since sea game is not prohibited it is irrelevant. God is just clarifying that we MAY eat sea game.
                          BTW does "hoot" mean fish as in the species or fish as in little fishes (thuna, salmon, etc.) and not sharks?

                          Peace

                          I am no longer a Sunna-rejecter. See 4:59-65, 62:2-4, 3:31, 4:156, 7:157 Messenger teaches and is to be followed and obeyed. Examples of revelation received which is not in the Qur'an: 3:123-126, 33:37, 2:187, 66:3, 62:9.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • W Offline
                            W Offline
                            WayFinder
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #50

                            Dont agree with you.. you forgot my opinion, which is that the fat is OK but not the brain.

                            You see..that's my point. Since the flesh is attached we cannot eat it.

                            I think we have an agreement on this finally... We can never be sure whether there is flesh residue with the fat etc... so that turns them doubtful and better to abstain.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • N Offline
                              N Offline
                              nsws1988
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #51

                              Read my earlier post again... God does not specify what Fat is ok, but He rather made it clear that he is making the task easy for the people, so that they do not get in lots of difficulties by trying to remove the fat stuck on the bones and entrails.

                              However, according to your logic...

                              Brains, entrails, bones, fat, gelatin of pigs are halaal... right?

                              Peace

                              I never thought of it that way BUT what I meant was that God is probably being specific when He said the LAHM/FLESH of pigs
                              Why not just 'pigs'?

                              I cannot answer your question as I am not completely sure and hope that we can both learn from the discussion.

                              God bless

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • W Offline
                                W Offline
                                WayFinder
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #52

                                Peace

                                I never thought of it that way BUT what I meant was that God is probably being specific when He said the LAHM/FLESH of pigs
                                Why not just 'pigs'?

                                I cannot answer your question as I am not completely sure and hope that we can both learn from the discussion.

                                God bless

                                Peace

                                That was exactly the point of this discussion... However, seems we have already made out point and to get an idea, you will have to read the whole thread.

                                My opinion is nothing can be consumed from the pig as it may be potentially polluted by meat remnants. This is true for the derivatives as well.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • N Offline
                                  N Offline
                                  nsws1988
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #53

                                  I think we have an agreement on this finally... We can never be sure whether there is flesh residue with the fat etc... so that turns them doubtful and better to abstain.

                                  Yeah that makes sense.
                                  So, if I understood you correctly, the flesh is both haram and harmful but the reason why the rest of the pig is also haram/ harmful is because it is attached to the flesh?

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • E Offline
                                    E Offline
                                    No longer a Sunna-rejecter
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #54

                                    I think we have an agreement on this finally... We can never be sure whether there is flesh residue with the fat etc... so that turns them doubtful and better to abstain.

                                    I totally disagree. There is no meat in the fat. Go to google images and type in "lard".
                                    There is meat on the bone so we better stay away from that. I will not change my position on this the fat of pigs is lawful.

                                    I am no longer a Sunna-rejecter. See 4:59-65, 62:2-4, 3:31, 4:156, 7:157 Messenger teaches and is to be followed and obeyed. Examples of revelation received which is not in the Qur'an: 3:123-126, 33:37, 2:187, 66:3, 62:9.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • W Offline
                                      W Offline
                                      WayFinder
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #55

                                      I totally disagree. There is no meat in the fat. Go to google images and type in "lard".
                                      There is meat on the bone so we better stay away from that. I will not change my position on this the fat of pigs is lawful.

                                      There are several grades of lard. The finest is leaf lard, which comes from the area around the kidneys of the pig. Back lard is another high grade, while rendered fat from other parts of the pig is less desirable. To make lard, either a wet or dry rendering process is used. Wet lard is made by steaming or boiling fat. Since the fat is not water soluble, it will float to the top, and the cook can simply skim it off. Dry rendering uses a large pan and no water to heat the fat, allowing the cook to skim impurities away.

                                      So how do we know if the FAT has not been polluted by being in contact with flesh remnants? The Quran made is clear that there are fat which are stuck to the bones, back and entrails. So how do we know from which part they took the fat to make the Lard? Lard is just a by-product of the pig.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • N Offline
                                        N Offline
                                        nsws1988
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #56

                                        There are several grades of lard. The finest is leaf lard, which comes from the area around the kidneys of the pig. Back lard is another high grade, while rendered fat from other parts of the pig is less desirable. To make lard, either a wet or dry rendering process is used. Wet lard is made by steaming or boiling fat. Since the fat is not water soluble, it will float to the top, and the cook can simply skim it off. Dry rendering uses a large pan and no water to heat the fat, allowing the cook to skim impurities away.

                                        So how do we know if the FAT has not been polluted by being in contact with flesh remnants? The Quran made is clear that there are fat which are stuck to the bones, back and entrails. So how do we know from which part they took the fat to make the Lard? Lard is just a by-product of the pig.

                                        What if I have my own pig and I slaughter it. I take only the fat that is not in contact with the flesh. Would that be ok?

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • E Offline
                                          E Offline
                                          No longer a Sunna-rejecter
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #57

                                          There are several grades of lard. The finest is leaf lard, which comes from the area around the kidneys of the pig. Back lard is another high grade, while rendered fat from other parts of the pig is less desirable. To make lard, either a wet or dry rendering process is used. Wet lard is made by steaming or boiling fat. Since the fat is not water soluble, it will float to the top, and the cook can simply skim it off. Dry rendering uses a large pan and no water to heat the fat, allowing the cook to skim impurities away.

                                          So how do we know if the FAT has not been polluted by being in contact with flesh remnants? The Quran made is clear that there are fat which are stuck to the bones, back and entrails. So how do we know from which part they took the fat to make the Lard? Lard is just a by-product of the pig.

                                          When did the Quran say that the fat is not allowed to be in contact with the flesh?
                                          How would you if the fat was in contact with the flesh or not when you buy (for example) a burger that was made with lard? You see..it's lawful.

                                          I am no longer a Sunna-rejecter. See 4:59-65, 62:2-4, 3:31, 4:156, 7:157 Messenger teaches and is to be followed and obeyed. Examples of revelation received which is not in the Qur'an: 3:123-126, 33:37, 2:187, 66:3, 62:9.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users