33:37 Prophet marrying with his adopted son's wife...
-
No, I've followed the whole thread from beginning and I didn't want to interupt your conversations, why do you assume that I don't know the basic ABC of Arabic ?
I think you have took lessons of Arabic but not as good as I see.
" " this is the right verse /what you wrote is wrong and it's distortion because there is "" not "fa" alone .
and for the meaning of the verse is too clear " " means take them back on equitable terms .
or
" " means or part with them on equitable terms; or leave them in their owns on equitable terms.
so this is another situation and it is different from the first one that stated in the thread, and the word "Amsaka" can take different meaning in the sentence .but how do you know that from the first verse that there is a Talaq situation, it's not mentioned . Don't use other verse to point out your clue because there will be always different meanings according to the sentence where the word in.
This man posed he is not Reformer but a different person named Preacher who is following the conversation of Mazhar and Reformer. If it is admitted later on that both are one and the same, nothing can be concluded except "Deceiver and liar simultaneously".
-
This man posed he is not Reformer but a different person named Preacher who is following the conversation of Mazhar and Reformer. If it is admitted later on that both are one and the same, nothing can be concluded except "Deceiver and liar simultaneously".
No, I didn't want to say that I'm thereformer, because I was waiting the mod for validating my account and I said that to stay out of the conversation not because I want to lie or deceive anyone, just because I don't want to disturbe the conversation, that's why I made this sentence. and you'll say the same if I still thePreacher .
-
No, I didn't want to say that I'm thereformer, because I was waiting the mod for validating my account and I said that to stay out of the conversation not because I want to lie or deceive anyone, just because I don't want to disturbe the conversation, that's why I made this sentence. and you'll say the same if I still thePreacher .
You seem to be confused in explaining what actually was in your heart. You better write what was in your heart in your native language, we will understand, if not we will get it translated.
-
You seem to be confused in explaining what actually was in your heart. You better write what was in your heart in your native language, we will understand, if not we will get it translated.
I don't need to explain to you what I did, I know what I did and I kno what's in my heart , so the words never describe the personnality or what someone feels .
I know it was a mistake from me, but it was for a reason, so you accept it or do whatever you want.
-
And getting back to the point. Who or what is Zaid and where do we get this information from.
Peace
quranists don't know who is Zaid! The only way for them to avoid the embarrassment is to translate it! Thanks.
-
And getting back to the point. Who or what is Zaid and where do we get this information from.
Peacehe wants to avoid this question? and look for my posts before there are at least 10 questions and none of them he answered yet he is intersted in talking about "you're nor Arab" funny .
-
quranists don't know who is Zaid! The only way for them to avoid the embarrassment is to translate it! Thanks.
why do you call them Quranists ? they don't know anything about Quran neither in their hands to obey what came in Quran, so Quranists is a good name and you shoudn't give it as a name to the ennemies of Islam.
-
he wants to avoid this question? and look for my posts before there are at least 10 questions and none of them he answered yet he is intersted in talking about "you're nor Arab" funny .
Quote
Quote from Mazhar on April 05, 2010, 111245 PM
Thereat when ZaidQuote
Reformer. first of all how do you know that Zaid is a name ?
Reformer! You have naively exposed yourself. You are NOT an Arab. You lied that your mom is Arab as well as Dad is Arab.
Only a person who does not know the basic of Arabic can put such stupid question. The subject of the verb comes after the verb and subject is always in nominative case.
And then he said this
Quote from Mazhar on Today at 013847 PM
Reformer! You have naively exposed yourself. You are NOT an Arab. You lied that your mom is Arab as well as Dad is Arab.Reformer hahahaha, You can ask members here, they will answer you .
and my question was right "how do you know that Zaid is a name "? it is also "" of the verb "" which means "to increase "
He considers here "" is the subject of the verb, not a person. Is he an Arab.
-
Only a person who does not know the basic of Arabic can put such stupid question. The subject of the verb comes after the verb and subject is always in nominative case.
you're still avoiding the answer, how do you that Zaid is a name ? it could be anything else .
the subject can be anything "" or "" or " ' or "" or ......etc
the word Zaid is "" . and also Zaid is "" of the verb "" we say " " .
And then he said this
He considers here "" is the subject of the verb, not a person. Is he an Arab.it could be masdar but how do you know that it is a name ?
-
you're still avoiding the answer, how do you that Zaid is a name ? it could be anything else .
the subject can be anything "" or "" or " ' or "" or ......etc
the word Zaid is "" . and also Zaid is "" of the verb "" we say " " .
it could be masdar but how do you know that it is a name ?
Beyond a shadow of doubt it stands proved that you are absolutely NOT an Arab, you seem to be an Indian villager studying in Bukhari ridden religious school. The nominative noun being the subject of a verb relating to divorcee woman can be none except her husband's name. Only a stupid student of the highest order could think that the subject of the verb under discussion could be "" or "".
-
This man posed he is not Reformer but a different person named Preacher who is following the conversation of Mazhar and Reformer. If it is admitted later on that both are one and the same, nothing can be concluded except "Deceiver and liar simultaneously".
This man deceives everyone not only in this but in a few other things as well
-
why do you call them Quranists ? they don't know anything about Quran neither in their hands to obey what came in Quran, so Quranists is a good name and you shoudn't give it as a name to the ennemies of Islam.
wasnt it you who started this thread?
http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9600242.0you do seem to contradict yourself a LOT
-
But Mazhar. Is it not you who speaks, reads, writes and studies Urdu in Pakistan?
Now I see why there is so much enemity between you and thereformer1. Indians and Pakistanis hate each other! ;D
Peace
No enmity. I don't hate any Indian, we do not and should not hate persons, their deceptive tactics should be abhored. Allah also says that then his example was like that dog..........So man is not being called dog but his conduc is being equated to a particular dog's habit. Whether you put weight on him or off load the weight he lolls out his tongue.
-
So I take it that there is still a chance for you and thereformer1 to play on the same cricket team?
Perhaps not since he has self assumed the responsibility of issuing tickets, and he leaves the chance of return since he is issuing tickets which can obviously be used for multiple journeys.
-
Beyond a shadow of doubt it stands proved that you are absolutely NOT an Arab, you seem to be an Indian villager studying in Bukhari ridden religious school. The nominative noun being the subject of a verb relating to divorcee woman can be none except her husband's name. Only a stupid student of the highest order could think that the subject of the verb under discussion could be "" or "".
No, I'm Arabic, so stop trying assuming that it is a name by your non-specific proof .
prove to me how do you know that Zaid is a name ? ok I'm waiting your answer . there is something in the verse prove that Zaid is a name , but the way that you have said that Zaid is a name is by reading hadith .
-
No, I'm Arabic, so stop trying assuming that it is a name by your non-specific proof .
prove to me how do you know that Zaid is a name ? ok I'm waiting your answer . there is something in the verse prove that Zaid is a name , but the way that you have said that Zaid is a name is by reading hadith .
Arabic is a language spoken by Arabs
-
So I take it that there is still a chance for you and thereformer1 to play on the same cricket team?
what's tha supposed to mean ?