Global Depopulation Agenda and the NWO
-
6/137 And thus was adorned for many of the mushrikeen/those who set up partners(with God) by their partners the killing of their children, so that they may cause them to perish, and to obscure upon them their deen/power-transaction. If God had willed they would not have done so. Therefore leave them and that which they forge.
6/140 They are lost indeed who kill their children foolishly without knowledge, and forbid what God has provided for them, forging a lie against God; they have indeed gone astray, and they are not the guided ones.
17/31 And do not kill your children for fear of poverty; We provide to them as well as to you; surely to kill them is a big mistake.
Salaam alaikum.
Articles about the elite's global depopulation agenda
Forced Abortion Dream Of The Scientific Elite
Scientific American Kill More Babies To Save Earth
Feminism and the Elite Depopulation Agenda
Obama's Elite Agenda Black Abortion for Profit
Obama Science Advisor Called For ?Planetary Regime? To Enforce Totalitarian Population Control Measures
-
EndGame HQ full length version
For the New World Order, a world government is just the beginning. Once in place they can engage their plan to exterminate 80% of the world's population, while enabling the "elites" to live forever with the aid of advanced technology. For the first time, crusading filmmaker ALEX JONES reveals their secret plan for humanity's extermination Operation ENDGAME.
<<<
Billionaire Bill shills for global warming and population reduction
Here's what he said verbatim
"The world today has 6.8 billion people. That's heading up to about nine billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent!"
That's what he said. What did he mean?
By the way, with advice from his bridge buddy Warren Buffett, Gates launders his billions through "charities" that pay to do the "science" for new vaccines. Gates just happens to own shares in the vaccine manufacturers that make the "innovative" vaccines his foundation pays the R & D costs to develop.
Nice work if you can get it.
<<<
-
i find 'endgame' kinda scary (
it's just horrible how they think... overpopulation is not really a problem, it's underproduction... there is enough resources for us all, instead of investing in military and weapons, they should invest in building more farms, sky-farms, hydroponics in middle of desert... anything...
but the elite don't want that -
Alex Jones is a phony, like most of the big name conspiracy crusading phonies. Theyre probably there to soak up any strayers from the mainstream school of thought by luring them in with small bits of truth and than to the best of their ability distort the significant rest, while still maintaining an image of being critical and revolutionary. Cant really remember was some time ago for me but isnt Jones into promoting the theory of UFOs and aliens?
I was however wondering more on if anyone has got any input from somewhere on where China stands in all this? They are a major player but i cant say i have much of a clue regarding their standing with zionists. How does their monetary system actually look like? How does their banking system work, do they employ the use of fractional reserve or common usury? Private central banks? Inflation? Who are in ultimate control of their economy and currency?
It's been on my mind quite a few times but i have so far never heard anything regarding China in that light.Peace.
-
i find 'endgame' kinda scary
it's just horrible how they think... overpopulation is not really a problem, it's underproduction... there is enough resources for us all, instead of investing in military and weapons, they should invest in building more farms, sky-farms, hydroponics in middle of desert... anything...
but the elite don't want thatTrue. God has provided and will keep on providing adequate resources for everyone. The problem is the people in control of the resources
4/53 Or do they have a portion from al-mulk(The Power/Ownership/Control). If so, they do not give people a speck.
Check these out
Population and Feeding the World
Human Population
-
true, and often i wonder how did they get in that position of power, i'm sure more and more people are aware of what they do, yet i don't see very often anyone who stands up to them and sues them for war crimes, medicine corruption, power abuse, illegal laws...
do we really need a government? do we need to have people above us and letting them control our lives? but why do we need them, there's gotta be a different, better way. people should realize it, but i think most are so deep in this system they think it's the only way to go.
i forgot who is was who said 'we deserve the government we get' (it was in some david icke lecture ) ) -
do we really need a government? do we need to have people above us and letting them control our lives? but why do we need them, there's gotta be a different, better way. people should realize it, but i think most are so deep in this system they think it's the only way to go.
Yes, there is a better way. It is the deen of Allah
109/1-6
Say O Rejectors!
I do not serve that which you serve,
Nor do you serve Him Whom I serve
Nor am I going to serve that which you serve,
Nor are you going to serve Him Whom I serve
To you your life-transaction/power-relation, to me my life-transaction/power-relation. -
Pastor Clenard Childress The Negro Project
"
New Jersey Pastor Clenard Childress of BlackGenocide.org discusses how The Negro Project was the foundation of today's industrialized abortion industry and how its pioneer, Margaret Sanger, who is still lauded by liberals as a human rights crusader, deliberately set out to sterilize blacks and encourage abortion of black babies in pursuit of a eugenicist drive to create a racially superior master race, a goal she shared with her close friend Adolf Hitler, and one that continues to reverberate through the generations as over 1,700 black babies are killed in the United States every day.Childress explains how the public school system's encouragement of adolescents to have sex by handing out condoms is circumventing the authority of parents, which has led to an epidemic of sexually transmitted diseases, unwanted pregnancies and promiscuity. Childress leads the fight against the normalization of abortion, noting that after just a few weeks it's now established that babies in the womb have heart beats and brain waves. Childress highlights how the Negro Project, Margaret Sanger's eugenics plan for black Americans, targeted the systematic genocide of blacks through the promotion of abortion.
Childress explains how Sanger, a devout racist who wrote letters to and received praise from Hitler, was an advocate of social Darwinism and believed that a master race should be bred while ethnic groups deemed inferior, including African-Americans, needed to either be exterminated or their numbers reduced greatly. Sanger's sterilization and abortion programs targeting the African-American community were set up in such a way so that the victims did not become suspicious of her true intentions. Sanger knew that to offset any distrust of her motives she would have to hire black religious leaders to deliver her programs and message, which is exactly what transpired as Childress highlights.
The eugenics drive to cull the black population was also achieved by withholding benefits from blacks who refused to be sterilized or have their baby aborted, thereby using coercion to force compliance with eugenics programs. After the end of the odious Tuskeegee experiments, wherein which African-American sharecroppers were deliberately and unwittingly infected by the U.S. Public Health Service with syphilis and not treated, eugenics went underground and re-emerged through organizations like Planned Parenthood.
Sanger worked closely with members of the Third Reich and yet she is still celebrated and honored today by liberals as a pioneer of women's rights. Childress labels Sanger's origins and her background as "the best kept secret in America" but notes that people are gradually becoming aware of her providence and her deep connections to today's neo-eugenics movement and its adjutant abortion industry.
Sanger's legacy lingers on in the modern era now that the African-American birth rate has dipped below the replacement rate thanks to industrialized abortion. Childress labels this process "genocide" and points out that Sanger's program has been successful - around 52 per cent of all African-American pregnancies now end in abortion.
"PLANNED PARENTHOOD IS EUGENICS -- Pastor Childress Jr. on Alex Jones
"
Pastor Childress Jr. joins Alex to debate the open practice of racist eugenics by Planned Parenthood 'abortuaries'. They also discuss the open reemergence of eugenics all across the board.The crimes committed by Nazi SS eugenicists during WWII horrified the world and discredited the pseudo-science of eugenics that, until then, was on the verge of becoming dominant all over the industrialized world.
So, after WWII, eugenicists worldwide moved underground into several fields of science (ecology, bioethics, genetics, anthropology, biology, economy, psychology, etc), creating what one of their leaders, Julian Huxley, termed 'crypto-eugenics' -- that is, introducing eugenics practices in society under a multidisciplinary, stealth, fashion.
Now, this pack of elitist-minded genocidalists is coming out into the open as they did in the early 20th century, openly advocating eugenics practices (draconian birth-control policies, sterilization, population reduction, euthanasia), under the pretexts of 'protecting the environment', 'reducing crime', and 'protecting economic stability'. The exact same talking points that were used up to WWII -- the only one they leave out now is the racial purity/hygiene talking point.
http//www.blackgenocide.org/
http//www.abort73.com/
http//www.infowars.com/
"The Womb is the most Dangerous Place for an African-American Baby
"
Abortion Inc Promoting Black Genocide in US?Despite being legalized nearly 40 years ago, the topic of abortion still raises huge controversy in the US, as some argue it is leading to genocide of the African-American population.
The founder of www.blackgenocide.org website, Rev. Dr. Clenard H. Childress Jr., has told RT that African-American women are being sold abortions.
"41% of NYC pregnancies end in abortion
"
New and eye-opening statistics about the rate of abortions in New York City have been released by the Health Department.
" -
Feminism and the Elite Depopulation Agenda
That Mankow dude sounds paranoid and insane at best, sick and hate-filled at worst. He obviously can't cope with the fact that not all women are content with producing babies and being obedient to the males in their lifes.
In the bible of modern feminism, "The Feminine Mystique" (1963) Betty Frieden makes this obscene comparison between housewives and Nazi concentration camp inmates
"Bible of modern feminism"? Says who? The author seems to have missed the fact that 50 years have passed since the publishing of this book.
In the case of human beings, the female must be prepared for motherhood and honored for her contribution to society. The male must be shown that the standard of manhood is to provide leadership and sustenance for mother and children.
http//img199.imageshack.us/img199/3949/scratching.gif
Feminism fits the elite's depopulation agenda. Since 1963, when "The Feminine Mystique" was published we have experienced an unprecedented breakdown in the family. More than half of all children are now born out of wedlock; the number of single parent households has tripled. In "The Broken Hearth," William Bennett writes "Most of our social pathologies, crime, imprisonment rates, welfare, educational underachievement, alcohol and drug abuse, suicide, depression, STD's, are manifestations, direct and indirect, of the crackup of the American family (p.4)."
Oh wow! And all this due to feminism! wow &
Instead, in schools and universities, the tender shoots of feminine sexuality are crushed under the feminist jackboot. Young women are taught that heterosexual sex, marriage and family are inherently oppressive. Homosexuality on the other hand is an act of rebellion that is "chic" and "normal."
Hear, hear! hmm
-
People have been exploited and abused for ages, but only if women benefit or seem to benefit in any way is when it is wrong. Typical of men lacking self assurance and contentment.
It is not feminism that invented colonialism, imperialism, slavery and the exploitation of children and carried it to extremes. Those don't seem to be a problem, provided one can pick on women at leasure. Imperialism exploits every ideology, including democracy and freedom, why pick on feminism? Obviously for the same reason that the authority of husbands was made sacred, because if the worse comes to the worst the poor male always has somebody to pick on who cannot defend herself. We may see again that wondrous paradise where women know their place when the populations in Europe and Northamerica are sufficiently impoverished for males to need somebody on whom to discharge frustration big way, and impoverishment is going on at good pace. The paradise of frustrated and resentful men is closer than we think. ?Look forward to it, poor men robbed of their manliness by stupid women!
Salaam
-
People have been exploited and abused for ages, but only if women benefit or seem to benefit in any way is when it is wrong. Typical of men lacking self assurance and contentment.
It is not feminism that invented colonialism, imperialism, slavery and the exploitation of children and carried it to extremes. Those don't seem to be a problem, provided one can pick on women at leasure. Imperialism exploits every ideology, including democracy and freedom, why pick on feminism? Obviously for the same reason that the authority of husbands was made sacred, because if the worse comes to the worst the poor male always has somebody to pick on who cannot defend herself. We may see again that wondrous paradise where women know their place when the populations in Europe and Northamerica are sufficiently impoverished for males to need somebody on whom to discharge frustration big way, and impoverishment is going on at good pace. The paradise of frustrated and resentful men is closer than we think. ?Look forward to it, poor men robbed of their manliness by stupid women!
Salaam
i's not women who created the atomic bomb, it's not the women who did the holocaust, it's not women who exploited other countries, except maybe margaret thatcher
-
i's not women who created the atomic bomb, it's not the women who did the holocaust, it's not women who exploited other countries, except maybe margaret thatcher
Yes, women neither ever did, nor will ever be able to do any of those things. It is the (mostly)elite males who came up with Feminism(as well as most other "-isms" and ideologies) for their own benefit.
-
It is the (mostly)elite males who came up with Feminism(as well as most other "-isms" and ideologies) for their own benefit.
They probably came up with the civil rights movement for their own benefit too.
It's obvious you have no clue about feminism or feminists. Neither does Mr. Makow who can't even spell Betty Friedan's name correctly.
I usually try to ignore the crappy propaganda you are posting, but the patronizing, slandering and lies are starting to annoy me. http//www.imagebanana.com/img/q6owvuis/033102bad_1_prv.gif
-
A "means to an end" may sound harsh to some. But in fact, nature designed women to make things happen. Mainly babies. A girlfriend once said, "I want to be used."
A man might think of a wife as a race driver thinks of his car, a cowboy his horse, a shepherd his dog, or a carpenter his tools. Men treasure the things that belong to them, serve them well, and are true.
A woman expresses her love by her devotion to husband and children. She is loved for what she does, not for her appearance or sex appeal. We love the people who are there for us. They love us for the same reason.
The romantic model of male-female love, based on lust and idealization of beauty, does not work. A man who "looks up" to a woman is destined to remain a child. On the other hand, a woman wants to look up to her husband.
http//www.rense.com/general79/ROMANCE.HTM
http//www.clicksmilies.com/s1106/wuerg/vomit-smiley-015.gif
"Slovenly" "Drab" Unkempt" "Slatternly" "Blowzy" --many adjectives come to mind to describe most women who wear jeans.
Since I noticed this trend, I am appalled by its prevalence. At least half of the women I see are wearing jeans.
Occasionally they are with men who are also clad in blue denim, emphasizing the unisex character of this proletarian garb.
But usually these women are alone and don't look happy. Often they seem angry and lost. Usually they are talking on a cell phone or listening to their ipod.
Men, if you're tempted by such a woman, her jeans signal that you may have to deal with her "GID" --"gender identity disorder." Her jeans are saying "I don't want to be a woman. I don't want to look good for men. I fear and distrust men. I want male prerogatives."
http//www.rense.com/general81/blue.htm
http//img199.imageshack.us/img199/3949/scratching.gif http//img199.imageshack.us/img199/3949/scratching.gif http//img199.imageshack.us/img199/3949/scratching.gif
-
She is loved for what she does, not for her appearance or sex appeal. We love the people who are there for us. They love us for the same reason.
The romantic model of male-female love, based on lust and idealization of beauty, does not work.
The same people would have you believe that when a guy goes for another woman besides the one he has...he can because it's his nature, call of the wild oats, doesn't mean he can't love multiple women and these women should accept such a higher love, it's their lovable doormat nature. Sadly, there are no such concessions for the woman. Her nature you see, is to love only one man, her man no matter how much of a jerk he is.
I've come to the conclusion that women and men are equally stupid. I'm voting for elves now.
-
I dont think Henry Maklow is against Women nor Womens rights.
I actually agree with many things Henry has written about as they seem to be Spot on.In my belief "True Feminism" was a movement of collective of women who were banded together by solidarity for having rights in their society if these rights did not exist.
However, The This Movement of just pure "Human Rights for all people in general" became hijacked and redefined as "The Feminist Movement", and would continue to become redefined...(by the elite).I believe the early women who fought for their rights were humble, justified, righteous and succeeded for a time. However as they started to gain in number and power the group had to be dominated by the Elite and changed 360?.
The New "Femminist" Movement would sing Female-Domination while becoming 100% submissive to hedonism and promiscuity.
The entire modern movement's goal I believe is to destroy the Family Foundation and Islam.There are many "Femminists"-(if thats what you would like to call them) that are all for Human rights (and womans) but are totally against this
Modern psuedo-Femmism.Layna
That Mankow dude sounds paranoid and insane at best, sick and hate-filled at worst. He obviously can't cope with the fact that not all women are content with producing babies and being obedient to the males in their lifes.
Leyna, Have you read some articles by Henry? I have and didnt get the same impression. I dont think hes against Women having the right to choose not to have babys and being obedient to their males..
I think hes against a System that is indoctrinating/preconditioning young (pre-teen) girls (and boys) into hating Islam and the Family Foundation.
Btw, Women Should have Babies and Should be Obedient to their Male Husbands (as well as vise versa) It is our Evolutionary Mission as a human species to have babies and be obedient to our significant others (within reason) as to progress our species in many ways.
Of course if people decide not to participate...they dont have to and that is their right. (but they should IMHO)------------------EDIT-----------------------------------
Let me make a point clear as I havent read ALL of Henry's Articles but have read some I agree with SOME of what he says.
Some of what he says is spot on, and some of it needs to be dissected and passed aside (like many other individuals in the truth movement).
I do believe The Elite use feminism and Fashion to destroy, however not to the degree as the Jean Article describes. -\ -
Been watching this thread for sometime, pretending it didn't exist...Sometimes hatred for all that's folly in the world can lead one into being muddled by silly conspiracies to rationalize the state of the world, in their minds. I am not exactly happy with the state of the world either, but come on...
To some extent some women allow it to happen, by this I mean for example in the west I am saddened that women stay with abusive jerks because they 'love' them, women who have chances to get out, so to speak. Largely, I am sure there are situations where they are trapped/have no way out. I also think dogma/upbringing (source for all that is ignorant, IMO) is a facilitator for such a mentality. Some women hear it so often that they actually start to believe it.
I think being submissive is/can be natural, generally speaking , but there is a different between a submissive personality and a subservient one. As a whole, at least in my experience women are more submissive , but this doesn't mean they are subservient! These days, many women don't put with any of the 'i am the man so listen to me no matter what I say' crap, as well as they shouldn't. Which I like to think is progress.The quran clearly treats the two sexes as equal. Logic too dictates treat others as how you'd like to be treated yourself.