Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. Community Needs
  3. Salat & Zakat
  4. In depth study on Salaat in Quran

In depth study on Salaat in Quran

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Salat & Zakat
158 Posts 17 Posters 6.7k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L Offline
    L Offline
    loxbox13
    wrote on last edited by
    #89

    6619

    O David! Lo! We have set thee as a ruler in the earth; therefor judge aright between mankind, and follow not desire that it beguile thee from the way of Allah. Lo! those who wander from the way of Allah have an awful doom, forasmuch as they forgot the Day of Reckoning. 3826

    To understand the quran u have to use other verses, Khalifa = Ruler

    rashad missed this one two and u still testify that he was a messenger of god !

    Abraham, Moses, Jesus And mohamed, were humans, made mistakes, but never a mistake in the revelation, because Allah taught his messengers the book, all of them, it's everywhere in the quran that allah says about all of them " we thaught them the book and wisdom"
    why didn't allah teach rashad khalifa ? didn't khalifa say that the angel gabriel taught his the verse Oh rashad we only sent u as a mercy to mankind !!!! something is wrong here, why didn't the angel gabriel taught his the book, except the verses where he's supposed to insert his name in parantheses? do alah send someone who don't understand the book and expect us to believe he's a messenger? does it sound a work of God ?
    Well, there is only one explanation of why did rashad not understand the quran, he was too busy trying to proove his messengership with a miricale brought by prophete mohamed, if the miracle of 19 is true, that it is a miracle of prophet mohamed, if it's not true, than it's a lie of rashad, neither way , rashad is a looser in this case, open your eyes

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • 6 Offline
      6 Offline
      6619
      wrote on last edited by
      #90

      6619

      O David! Lo! We have set thee as a ruler in the earth; therefor judge aright between mankind, and follow not desire that it beguile thee from the way of Allah. Lo! those who wander from the way of Allah have an awful doom, forasmuch as they forgot the Day of Reckoning. 3826

      To understand the quran u have to use other verses, Khalifa = Ruler

      rashad missed this one two and u still testify that he was a messenger of god !

      Abraham, Moses, Jesus And mohamed, were humans, made mistakes, but never a mistake in the revelation, because Allah taught his messengers the book, all of them, it's everywhere in the quran that allah says about all of them " we thaught them the book and wisdom"
      why didn't allah teach rashad khalifa ? didn't khalifa say that the angel gabriel taught his the verse Oh rashad we only sent u as a mercy to mankind !!!! something is wrong here, why didn't the angel gabriel taught his the book, except the verses where he's supposed to insert his name in parantheses? do alah send someone who don't understand the book and expect us to believe he's a messenger? does it sound a work of God ?
      Well, there is only one explanation of why did rashad not understand the quran, he was too busy trying to proove his messengership with a miricale brought by prophete mohamed, if the miracle of 19 is true, that it is a miracle of prophet mohamed, if it's not true, than it's a lie of rashad, neither way , rashad is a looser in this case, open your eyes

      Salaam,

      Great point to show that David was a "Khalifah", like Adam, and all of us as humans.
      As for Rashad, he did not receive a new revelation. He was 100% human, and his job was to point at following the Quran exclusively among other things. He was not shown everything in the Quran, just like Muhammad was not shown everything in the Quran.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • L Offline
        L Offline
        loxbox13
        wrote on last edited by
        #91

        Salaam,

        Great point to show that David was a "Khalifah", like Adam, and all of us as humans.
        As for Rashad, he did not receive a new revelation. He was 100% human, and his job was to point at following the Quran exclusively among other things. He was not shown everything in the Quran, just like Muhammad was not shown everything in the Quran.

        Wrong , Prophet Mohamed was show everything, he understood the quran perfectly, plus it was his language of koreish, plus he gets the reveklation direct from the holy spirit

        didn't u read, Aalamahou shadig el kiwa ? he wzasttaght by moghty in power in surah nedjm ! u think allah isn't a good teacher?
        or u really think that rashad had the same level as prophete mohamed when it is about revelation ?
        u really unser estimate the prophets
        u really think that u understand god and the revekation better than the messengers, wow , ofcourse, u know what bigmac is, they don't
        But, allah is the best teacher, and when he said he taught him, meaning he knopw the revelation that cale to him in his language in his time better than rashad khalifa or u
        what an arrogane
        or maybe y wish the revelation didn't come on mohamed, maybe it was supposed to come on your idol rashadn if rashad khalifa said there is only 1 prayer a day, u will be debating for 1 prayer now

        stick with yoiur translation of rashad, i will stick with the Quran of the messenger of god

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • 6 Offline
          6 Offline
          6619
          wrote on last edited by
          #92

          Wrong , Prophet Mohamed was show everything, he understood the quran perfectly, plus it was his language of koreish, plus he gets the reveklation direct from the holy spirit

          didn't u read, Aalamahou shadig el kiwa ? he wzasttaght by moghty in power in surah nedjm ! u think allah isn't a good teacher?
          or u really think that rashad had the same level as prophete mohamed when it is about revelation ?
          u really unser estimate the prophets
          u really think that u understand god and the revekation better than the messengers, wow , ofcourse, u know what bigmac is, they don't
          But, allah is the best teacher, and when he said he taught him, meaning he knopw the revelation that cale to him in his language in his time better than rashad khalifa or u
          what an arrogane
          or maybe y wish the revelation didn't come on mohamed, maybe it was supposed to come on your idol rashadn if rashad khalifa said there is only 1 prayer a day, u will be debating for 1 prayer now

          stick with yoiur translation of rashad, i will stick with the Quran of the messenger of god

          Salaam,

          There are tons of scientific miracles of the Quran, like black holes, the speed of light, etc...
          Muhammad understood a lot of the Quran, not everything. God alone can understand completely the extreme depth of the Quran. Some aspects of the Quran could only be understood by future generations with the advance of science, computers, etc... This was my point brother.

          Pierre

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Offline
            M Offline
            mmkhan
            wrote on last edited by
            #93

            Salaam

            Salaam,

            Great point to show that David was a "Khalifah", like Adam, and all of us as humans.
            As for Rashad, he did not receive a new revelation. He was 100% human, and his job was to point at following the Quran exclusively among other things. He was not shown everything in the Quran, just like Muhammad was not shown everything in the Quran.

            Brother please look at the following aayaats and let me know your understanding about the same.

            4164
            4164 And messengers of whom We have told to you from before, and messengers We have not told to you; and Allah spoke to Moses directly.

            Please note we have been told about some Rasools and not been told about some Rasools.

            11120
            11120 And We tell to you from the news of all the messengers with which We strengthen your heart. In this has come to you the truth and a lesson and a reminder for the believers.

            Please note again that we have been told everything about AlRasools . About them, everything is already been told.

            That means, Rashad Khalifa could be a Rasool but NOT AlRasool . Rasool could be any, but AlRasools are those who are selected and appointed for this position by Allah.

            And I came to know that Rashad Khalifa was murdered.

            Allah said

            567
            567 O the messenger, deliver what was sent down to you from your Lord, and if you do not then you have not delivered His message; and Allah will protect you from the people. And Allah does not guide the rejecting people.

            AlRasools are protected by Allah from the people, so they cannot be murdered.

            May Allah guide us all towards the Truth.
            Mohammed M. Khan

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • L Offline
              L Offline
              loxbox13
              wrote on last edited by
              #94

              Salaam,

              There are tons of scientific miracles of the Quran, like black holes, the speed of light, etc...
              Muhammad understood a lot of the Quran, not everything. God alone can understand completely the extreme depth of the Quran. Some aspects of the Quran could only be understood by future generations with the advance of science, computers, etc... This was my point brother.

              Pierre

              Yhr problem of scientific verses isn't that it 'll be understood by future generations, the translators if they did translate , we created the heavens and x'ill be expanding
              litterally expanding = mouwasiooun , the translators tried to put what they understand, if they took it litterally than it will be understood by the most primitif man, well, i guess it didn't make sense to pitckall and yusuf ali, so they translate what they mean
              All scientific verses are understood with the litteral meaning of the language, all of them, there is no guessing or discovering , read all of them in arabic and u qill see
              as for prophet mohamed, i believe he knows the relationship of god and men better than any of us, remember? he saw the one who reveals to him the revelation, in the horizon , than came nearer , and he seen him another descent, near the lot tre etc....
              none of us can understand this phenomena, so no matter how scientific we'll be, we'll never get a little of what he knew, and most of all, he get the most valuable book to humanity , he understand at least duluk shams better than u
              the problem is you're trying to forget about the quran and focus on a digit , like we didn't believe in the quran before the digit 19 , the quran doesn't need a digit for people to believe, my grand fathers if u ask them they'll tell u the quran is the word of god with no doubt, and the generations before , even the worst sectariens tell u that the quran is the word of god, so u really believe that because of digit 19 , people will relise that the quran is the word of god? what about non muslims? u think u present them a digit 19 to believe? they don't care about calculating, people are not willing to calculate for days to proove that 19 is a digit denominator etc... people believe in the message , the content or they don't believe, just as it was exposed by prophet mohamed . u guys even try to contradict the quran and using maths to prouve the 5 prayers? what about the regular average person who don't count like u ? is he supposed to be a follower ? trusting u as people trusted bukhari and all ? ... I mean if u want to belong to a sect, i don't mind, if u want to belong to a person called himself a mesenger , doesn't bother me , but u came here and say these people are hypocrits and all, isn't a work of a messenger, u have no knowlige of the quranic language and u pretends that u studied the quran in debts
              I say Duluk Dalw Fi Biir
              ,
              very clear in arabi =
              bucket going down in the well

              Duluk is used only for a buckt when it's going down,
              Find me an arabic sentence that says duluk about somthing coming from high, than i might believe u
              For now something coming from high is called Tadali, or hubut , or nuzul , but never duluk, even the word dululk has two word similar, Dulu = bucket and dalak = rubbing
              search more and bring prof, u never know, but as long as it is now, i lnow the word duluk in arabic, so , there is a problem, one of us is wrong, and without arrogance, people need proof, concrete proof , not just following, plus u used the verse toudhiroun that has nothing to do with salat , no order of anything in this verse, so look in other verse u might find somthing,

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • 6 Offline
                6 Offline
                6619
                wrote on last edited by
                #95

                Salaam

                Brother please look at the following aayaats and let me know your understanding about the same.

                4164
                4164 And messengers of whom We have told to you from before, and messengers We have not told to you; and Allah spoke to Moses directly.

                Please note we have been told about some Rasools and not been told about some Rasools.

                11120
                11120 And We tell to you from the news of all the messengers with which We strengthen your heart. In this has come to you the truth and a lesson and a reminder for the believers.

                Please note again that we have been told everything about AlRasools . About them, everything is already been told.

                That means, Rashad Khalifa could be a Rasool but NOT AlRasool . Rasool could be any, but AlRasools are those who are selected and appointed for this position by Allah.

                And I came to know that Rashad Khalifa was murdered.

                Allah said

                567
                567 O the messenger, deliver what was sent down to you from your Lord, and if you do not then you have not delivered His message; and Allah will protect you from the people. And Allah does not guide the rejecting people.

                AlRasools are protected by Allah from the people, so they cannot be murdered.

                May Allah guide us all towards the Truth.
                Mohammed M. Khan

                Salaam Mohammed,

                You are wrong about messengers not being killed (it is actually a common mistake)

                287 To Moses We gave the Book (Torah) and sent after him other Messengers in succession; then We gave Jesus, the son of Mary, clear Signs and strengthened him with the Holy Spirit (Gabriel). Why is it that whenever there came to you a Messenger with a message which did not suit your desires, you became so arrogant that to some of them you called impostors and others you killed!

                3183 They (also) said "Allah took our promise not to believe in a messenger unless he showed us a sacrifice consumed by Fire (from heaven)." Say "There came to you messengers before me, with clear Signs and even with what ye ask for why then did ye slay them, if ye speak the truth?"

                570 Certainly We took a covenant from the Children of Israel and sent them Messengers. Whenever there came to them a Messenger with a message that did not suit their fancies, either they called him an impostor or they put him to death.

                Lots of messengers have been murdered, including Rashad Khalifa.

                Pierre

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • L Offline
                  L Offline
                  loxbox13
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #96

                  Salaam Mohammed,

                  You are wrong about messengers not being killed (it is actually a common mistake)

                  287 To Moses We gave the Book (Torah) and sent after him other Messengers in succession; then We gave Jesus, the son of Mary, clear Signs and strengthened him with the Holy Spirit (Gabriel). Why is it that whenever there came to you a Messenger with a message which did not suit your desires, you became so arrogant that to some of them you called impostors and others you killed!

                  3183 They (also) said "Allah took our promise not to believe in a messenger unless he showed us a sacrifice consumed by Fire (from heaven)." Say "There came to you messengers before me, with clear Signs and even with what ye ask for why then did ye slay them, if ye speak the truth?"

                  570 Certainly We took a covenant from the Children of Israel and sent them Messengers. Whenever there came to them a Messenger with a message that did not suit their fancies, either they called him an impostor or they put him to death.

                  Lots of messengers have been murdered, including Rashad Khalifa.

                  Pierre

                  why all three verses are talking about the past ? why didn't allah say clearly there are messengers after mohamed, the messenger of god ?
                  why there's not even one verse talking about a messenger in the future ?
                  maybe god likes to play riddles ? we have to guess ? u know how many messengers of god claim the verse of the covenant ? why shall i believe one and not the others ?
                  why is it so important for u to believe in khalfa with al the mistakes in the revelation that he did ?
                  why didn't have any proof ?
                  if angel gabriel told him that Ya Sin is about him , than wo are the people whom he preached to and their fathers weren't warned?
                  there's too many question adon't have answers , u just want everyone to believe in the code19

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • M Offline
                    M Offline
                    Mazhar
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #97

                    The Messenger of Allah cannot be murdered.

                    http//www.haqeeqat.org.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.Arabic%20Text/2.87p.gif
                    whereby/thereat/for that reason you people had publicly contradicted a group of them, and you people keep ridiculing/insulting/defaming/slandering against another group of them.

                    http//www.haqeeqat.org.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.Tabweeb%20Part%202/001.%20Roots%20originating%20in%20Surat%20002/2.054/211.%20Faqtolu%20Qaaf%20Ta%20Laam/4.gif
                    Verb Imperfect; Second Person; Plural; Masculine; Mood Indicative evident by ""; + Subject Pronoun in nominative state; - Verbal Noun (1)285(2)287(3)291(4)3326=4

                    Verb Imperfect Indicative

                    It indicates, an act which does not take place at any one particular time, to the exclusion of any other point in time, but which takes place all the time, or rather in speaking of which no notice is taken of time, but only of duration. In English grammar we call it "the indefinite present". A verb in the indefinite aspect is used when the beginning or ending of an action, an event, or condition is unknown or unimportant to the meaning of the sentence. The indefinite aspect is also used to indicate an habitual or repeated action, event, or condition.

                    287 alongwith detailed Article in Urdu

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • L Offline
                      L Offline
                      loxbox13
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #98

                      The Messenger of Allah cannot be murdered.

                      http//www.haqeeqat.org.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.Arabic%20Text/2.87p.gif
                      whereby/thereat/for that reason you people had publicly contradicted a group of them, and you people keep ridiculing/insulting/defaming/slandering against another group of them.

                      http//www.haqeeqat.org.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.Tabweeb%20Part%202/001.%20Roots%20originating%20in%20Surat%20002/2.054/211.%20Faqtolu%20Qaaf%20Ta%20Laam/4.gif
                      Verb Imperfect; Second Person; Plural; Masculine; Mood Indicative evident by ""; + Subject Pronoun in nominative state; - Verbal Noun (1)285(2)287(3)291(4)3326=4

                      Verb Imperfect Indicative

                      It indicates, an act which does not take place at any one particular time, to the exclusion of any other point in time, but which takes place all the time, or rather in speaking of which no notice is taken of time, but only of duration. In English grammar we call it "the indefinite present". A verb in the indefinite aspect is used when the beginning or ending of an action, an event, or condition is unknown or unimportant to the meaning of the sentence. The indefinite aspect is also used to indicate an habitual or repeated action, event, or condition.

                      287 alongwith detailed Article in Urdu

                      what does this mean ?
                      Kadhabtoum is past, and taktouloune is continuation of kadhabtoum , meaning also past !!!

                      i understand arabic language but not the study of grammar

                      I believe submitters are doing exactly the same as sunni and shia, looking for any verse that isn't too clear and try to interpret it to support their doctrine

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • M Offline
                        M Offline
                        mmkhan
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #99

                        Wa Alaika Salaamun brother,

                        Salaam Mohammed,

                        You are wrong about messengers not being killed (it is actually a common mistake)

                        287 To Moses We gave the Book (Torah) and sent after him other Messengers in succession; then We gave Jesus, the son of Mary, clear Signs and strengthened him with the Holy Spirit (Gabriel). Why is it that whenever there came to you a Messenger with a message which did not suit your desires, you became so arrogant that to some of them you called impostors and others you killed!

                        3183 They (also) said "Allah took our promise not to believe in a messenger unless he showed us a sacrifice consumed by Fire (from heaven)." Say "There came to you messengers before me, with clear Signs and even with what ye ask for why then did ye slay them, if ye speak the truth?"

                        570 Certainly We took a covenant from the Children of Israel and sent them Messengers. Whenever there came to them a Messenger with a message that did not suit their fancies, either they called him an impostor or they put him to death.

                        Lots of messengers have been murdered, including Rashad Khalifa.

                        Pierre

                        Brother form the aayaats quoted above by you, you missed the point that I raised. Please do my prev. post carefully, inshaAllah, you will get the point.

                        As I said Al-Rasools cannot be killed or murdered. But Rasools could be.

                        If you think Rashad Khalifa was just a Rasool then there is NO problem. Cause there must be a Rasool in every nation or a group.

                        Now please look at the aayaats you have quoted, that support my view, cause aayaats cannot contradict.

                        287

                        3183

                        570

                        And have quoted the following aayat in my previous post.

                        567

                        I hope you understand. Brother, please read my previous post carefully and if you have any difficulty in understanding what I am trying to say, please get back to me, inshaAllah, I will try to explain in other words.

                        May Allah guide us all towards the Truth.
                        Mohammed M. Khan

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • K Offline
                          K Offline
                          kgwithnob
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #100

                          From mmkhan

                          As I said Al-Rasools cannot be killed or murdered. But Rasools could be.

                          3144

                          It seems that there is a bit of contradiction within your "reasoning."

                          peace,
                          Khalil

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • U Offline
                            U Offline
                            unknownuser
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #101

                            Peace,

                            3144
                            And not Muhammad only a Messenger, certainly passed away from before him Messengers
                            So if he died or is slain (qutila)...

                            Above does not rule out the possibility although presumption applying to RK and his bizarre numerology is absurd.

                            Let?s apply numerology to the two verses he cast out?

                            9128
                            9
                            301004 3112040 20060630 4050 15080602040 707107 7030105 401 705040040 82001090 7030102040 213040640501050 2001680 20081040
                            9
                            = 19 x...!

                            9129
                            9
                            80150 40063061 8010030 860210 130305 301 1305 1301 56 7030105 40062030400 656 2002 13070200300 130709001040
                            9
                            = 19 x...!

                            9
                            301004 3112040 20060630 4050 15080602040 707107 7030105 401 705040040 82001090 7030102040 213040640501050 2001680 20081040
                            80150 40063061 8010030 860210 130305 301 1305 1301 56 7030105 40062030400 656 2002 13070200300 130709001040
                            = 19 x...!

                            9128129
                            301004 3112040 20060630 4050 15080602040 707107 7030105 401 705040040 82001090 7030102040 213040640501050 2001680 20081040
                            80150 40063061 8010030 860210 130305 301 1305 1301 56 7030105 40062030400 656 2002 13070200300 130709001040
                            9128129
                            = 19 x 19 x...!!

                            9128-129 the 19th word is Allah!

                            9128-129 total letters 60 + 54 = 114 (6 x 19!)

                            9129 ? number of letters from beginning of verse to including Allah is 19!

                            9129 from and including Allah to end of the verse is multiple of 19!
                            130305 301 1305 1301 56 7030105 40062030400 656 2002 13070200300 130709001040 = 19 x ?!

                            Miracle verifier http//markknowsnothing.com/cgi-bin/calculator.php

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • K Offline
                              K Offline
                              kgwithnob
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #102

                              @Noon De Plume,

                              Let?s apply numerology to the two verses he cast out?

                              Forget about all those jumbo-mambo SUDOKU games.

                              How about the straightforward 9127 = 9+1+2+7 = 19 ?!!! ;D

                              Let me know about any other chapter in The Qur'aan having the above same & simple property.

                              Peace,
                              Khalil

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • U Offline
                                U Offline
                                unknownuser
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #103

                                @Noon De Plume,

                                Forget about all those jumbo-mambo SUDOKU games.

                                How about the straightforward 9127 = 9+1+2+7 = 19 ?!!! ;D

                                Let me know about any other chapter in The Qur'aan having the above same & simple property.

                                Peace,
                                Khalil

                                Sure 1 + 7 + 3 + 8 = 19 ...

                                1738 All of this is bad and disliked by your Lord.

                                Peace

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • K Offline
                                  K Offline
                                  kgwithnob
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #104

                                  Sure 1 + 7 + 3 + 8 = 19 ...

                                  1738 All of this is bad and disliked by your Lord.

                                  Peace

                                  I believe you deliberately misunderstood my point, which was to explain that chapter 9 is the only chapter that emphasizes to us, that it has 127 verses, not 129. Again 9127 = 9+1+2+7 = 19!

                                  Peace,
                                  Khalil

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • J Offline
                                    J Offline
                                    Jack
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #105

                                    Sure 1 + 7 + 3 + 8 = 19 ...

                                    1738 All of this is bad and disliked by your Lord.

                                    Peace

                                    Hilarious ;D

                                    On a related note, 875 is not part of the quran! You see 8+7+4=19 thus any verse that comes after 874 can't possibly be part of the quran!!

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • K Offline
                                      K Offline
                                      kgwithnob
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #106

                                      Hilarious ;D

                                      On a related note, 875 is not part of the quran! You see 8+7+4=19 thus any verse that comes after 874 can't possibly be part of the quran!!

                                      You "wise" guys are shunning away from a very important point here. The only chapter in dispute here is chapter 9. No one has ever had any doubts about the integrity of any other part of The Qur'aan. Historically, only the number of verses in chapter 9 has been in question, not any other part of The Qur'aan.

                                      Peace,
                                      Khalil

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • M Offline
                                        M Offline
                                        mmkhan
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #107

                                        Salaam Khalil,

                                        From mmkhan3144

                                        It seems that there is a bit of contradiction within your "reasoning."

                                        peace,
                                        Khalil

                                        Thank you for the aayat.

                                        Brother please read the same aayat carefully again. It talks about Rasool again, not Al-Rasool. You missed it bro.

                                        3144

                                        May Allah open our hearts to understand correctly.
                                        Mohammed M. Khan

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • 6 Offline
                                          6 Offline
                                          6619
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #108

                                          Salaam Khalil,

                                          Thank you for the aayat.

                                          Brother please read the same aayat carefully again. It talks about Rasool again, not Al-Rasool. You missed it bro.

                                          3144

                                          May Allah open our hearts to understand correctly.
                                          Mohammed M. Khan

                                          Salaam Mohammed and all,

                                          287 To Moses We gave the Book (Torah) and WE sent after him other Messengers in succession; then We gave Jesus, the son of Mary, clear Signs and strengthened him with the Holy Spirit (Gabriel). Why is it that whenever there came to you a Messenger with a message which did not suit your desires, you became so arrogant that to some of them you called impostors and others you killed!

                                          Why try to deny the straightforward Quran ? Why don't you simply admit that indeed a number of messenger that God sent were indeed murdered ? Why try to play on words when they are clear ? When God said "WE gave Jesus clear signs", does it mean that yes he was a messenger, but a false messenger ? ;D If you claim that no messenger of God cannot be slain in the light of 287 and a number of other verses, it means you are not a sincere person. Yes God protected messengers, all of them, all along their lives. But he also allowed eventually some to be slain to expose the guilty, so they will have to face exactly who they are on the Day of Judgment.

                                          The real reason why Rashad was assassinated is because he proclaimed "La elaha ela Allah". (3735)
                                          He proved with the Quran that people who mention Muhammad beside God are not believers (3945, 4012).
                                          The disbelievers simply could not stand the truth and silenced him.

                                          This alone is the proof he was a messenger. The problem is that people are only willing to accept messengers that are perfect (they make up their own definition of a messenger), who are somewhat divine and never make any mistakes. Sorry guys, it was not the case of Rashad, nor of any of the past messengers including Muhammad, Moses, Jesus etc.... They all made numerous mistakes, and it is why people rejected them, together with the fact that they hated the message of Oneness of God that they preached, and even killed some of them out of rage.

                                          Pierre

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users