Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. General Issues / Questions
  4. Looking to interview code 19 deniers

Looking to interview code 19 deniers

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Issues / Questions
36 Posts 22 Posters 755 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • E Offline
    E Offline
    Edip_Yuksel
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Peace free-mind'ers

    The film crew is now in the United States and they are currently interviewing some scholars, academicians, experts on the mathematical aspects of the Quran. Meanwhile, they would like to interview those who have VERY STRONG views against code 19. They asked me a list of their names and I provided them with a short list Daniel Lomax (they could not contact him so far), Dave Thomas (skeptic from New Mexico... He was contacted but he expressed a personal excuse), Bilal Philips (currently being contacted, but he lives overseas and the crew most likely will visit him at his place if he accepts the interview), and Ayman (his whereabouts are unknown).

    The schedule is still in the process of being determined and by Monday it will be finalized, God willing. I learned that the crew will shoot in Southern California, Atlanta, New York and perhaps, Vancouver, Canada. The filmmakers are going to fly some people to these main locations.

    So if you know any good critics of 19, please contact them and let them know about this invitation.

    The director of the project has a phone number but he is not fluent in English; he speaks Russian. So, they could contact me via email or my cell phone number.

    Peace.,
    Edip

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • S Offline
      S Offline
      savage_carrot
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      I have VERY STRONG words against it. Will there be censorship?

      and Ayman (his whereabouts are unknown).
      Not sure how the film crew is going to hunt him down.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Offline
        M Offline
        Mazhar
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        RASHAD KHALIFA

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • J Offline
          J Offline
          Jack
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Not sure how the film crew is going to hunt him down.

          Yeah... Ayman, quick. Change your address. The KGB is after you now.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • E Offline
            E Offline
            Edip_Yuksel
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Yeah... Ayman, quick. Change your address. The KGB is after you now.

            Well, I like your joke. Indeed the producer of the film, who knows English well, hired an American private agent to find the contact addresses of some people, such as Bill Maher, who is a funny atheist.

            Unfortunately, we do not know Ayman's real name and any information to locate him for a Socratic grilling session. I have challenged many detractors for a face-to-face debate, which is much more powerful in exposing contradictions and dishonesty. I know it from my personal experience on live Turkish TV debates, where my opponents had to retract their claims or escape from the studio under the watching eyes of millions of people. The imam in London for instance. He was exposed in front of his own people, and had to escape from the room in humiliation (unfortunately, that was not recorded on video but I listed the names of witnesses in that meeting in my report)... The video clips of some of my Turkish debates are now available at youtube.com

            So, in a sense you are right. If I knew Ayman's whereabouts, I would suprise him like those newsreporters confronting Maddoff and other crooks. Ayman and his ilk are worse than Maddoff, since they use their knowledge to distort and hide God's signs.

            Peace,
            Edip

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M Offline
              M Offline
              Mazhar
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              from the studio under the watching eyes of millions of people.

              Only funny things are watched by millions of people.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • WakasW Offline
                WakasW Offline
                Wakas
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                peace Edip, all,

                If I knew Ayman's whereabouts, I would suprise him like those newsreporters confronting Maddoff and other crooks. Ayman and his ilk are worse than Maddoff, since they use their knowledge to distort and hide God's signs.

                I dont see the need to "find" anyone these days for a face to face interview, considering we have the internet. I think an audio narration written and/or narrated by Ayman over a slideshow of his points would suffice.

                And for sake of argument, lets say Ayman has used his knowledge to distort God's signs... I do wonder who has contributed more to the understanding of The Quran Ayman or all code-19 supporters put together? To my knowledge I only know of one code-19 supporter who actually does any Quran-meaning based study, and that is you. If you know of anyone else who writes articles on better understanding the meaning of The Quran, let us know, as I've often been curious about that.

                I must say that I find the code-19 camp rather peculiar in the sense that they seem to spend a disproportionate amount of time on code-19 calculations/debate rather than better understanding The Quran. Or at least this is the impression I get from various online forums, and I'm sure I'm not the only one. Each to their own.

                All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • P Offline
                  P Offline
                  Paradox_Uncreated
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  Indeed. Is 19`ers calculations about righetousness, or is it an occult attraction to numbers?

                  The number itself is about the 19 angels, that guard hell. The amount of angels is a test, that confounds the disbelievers. "What does God mean by this?" - This must be esoteric knowledge at the highest level. If one should encounter these angels, I guess, as a believer, one would not be confounded.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • I Offline
                    I Offline
                    Ilyusha
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    I do wonder who has contributed more to the understanding of The Quran Ayman or all code-19 supporters put together? To my knowledge I only know of one code-19 supporter who actually does any Quran-meaning based study, and that is you. If you know of anyone else who writes articles on better understanding the meaning of The Quran, let us know, as I've often been curious about that.

                    You forgot Layth. He acknowledges 19.

                    His words "I am a supporter of code 19 as there is sufficient evidence for its existence in the Quran. What I do not support is some of the inconsistent counts and forced conclusions based on erronoeus data."

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • S Offline
                      S Offline
                      san
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10
                      1. How unbiased will the project be? How independent is the crew?

                      2. Have you contacted Noon/SEid? (You can Soccratic-grill someone via skype, can't you? They give the HD option)

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • L Offline
                        L Offline
                        loxbox13
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        Well, I like your joke. Indeed the producer of the film, who knows English well, hired an American private agent to find the contact addresses of some people, such as Bill Maher, who is a funny atheist.

                        Unfortunately, we do not know Ayman's real name and any information to locate him for a Socratic grilling session. I have challenged many detractors for a face-to-face debate, which is much more powerful in exposing contradictions and dishonesty. I know it from my personal experience on live Turkish TV debates, where my opponents had to retract their claims or escape from the studio under the watching eyes of millions of people. The imam in London for instance. He was exposed in front of his own people, and had to escape from the room in humiliation (unfortunately, that was not recorded on video but I listed the names of witnesses in that meeting in my report)... The video clips of some of my Turkish debates are now available at youtube.com

                        So, in a sense you are right. If I knew Ayman's whereabouts, I would suprise him like those newsreporters confronting Maddoff and other crooks. Ayman and his ilk are worse than Maddoff, since they use their knowledge to distort and hide God's signs.

                        Peace,
                        Edip

                        I don't believe AYMAN will reveal his true identity for many reasons
                        1 - history westerners of the 18th century enemies and haters of Islam, the quran and the messengers, colonised all muslim countries with no exceptions, one of the most important duties was to alter the system of Islam , and by doing that , the enemy is the quran, so they invented all ahadiths and tafassir and false history of Islam to break the mainstream f the muslim societies , and they get lost , after that they all get independant in the same period, mission accomplishe

                        these people aren't gonna allow any one who dare expose and explain the true explanation of the quran, therefore exposing the true history of humanity before the 17 th century. they will never allow any honest man to expose the truths , but again, they had no problem with people like khalifa , specially a person called messenger f god who had no problem at all with the FBI or CIA or The MOSSAD or all that powerfull people , just because he didn't bother them, what bother them is. the truth, an honest person and a pwerfull one specially..

                        if you EDIP were on the truth, you will have no publicity for your version of the quran.

                        Ayman , is a person I don't know where he lives or if he's a good person or not, but according to his vision of things, He is more universal that you, who just created another sect, you're not gonna bother anyone with a sect, there are thousands in every religion, whatbother governments is universal truths, not religion truth

                        Deen isn't religion
                        Deen is the Due , we owe God. our conduct and actions, and not mosques and prayers.
                        re read the quran without any doctrine in your mind be it 19ers or sunni or shiaa or anything, read the qqura and a person who belong to the universe and not to a group or a sect.

                        I don't believe Ayman will reveal himself because of his honesty , and if he does, maybe his honesty will cost him.

                        this is purely the way i analyse our people here. my personal view, I might be wrong

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • S Offline
                          S Offline
                          Student_of_Allah
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          When can we expect the final product to be released ? Agree with code 19 or not, I dont see why the video should be uninteresting. Unless ofcourse its like the creationist videos on youtube, people wearing lab coats claiming to be scientists and preaching flat earth ideas.

                          Allah guide us please )

                          -------------------------- Student of Allah

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • R Offline
                            R Offline
                            Roshan
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            Peace

                            Why is time and money being wasted on such an endeavour? Out of all the things in the Quran, you are choosing to focus on something that is not explicitly stated in the Quran and that has little bearing on anything. Does the Quran not instruct us not to spend too much time over these verses?

                            Just like your ABC interview, which went very well until you started talking about 19.

                            The fact is that '19' is impossible to verify for most as they do not have the ability to go through the Quran counting word numbers, applying numerical values to words etc.

                            And just like the ABC video, you are unable to explain in any specific way, what code 19 is, except to say that, when it suits you, there is some multiple of 19 so the text must mean X,Y,Z etc.

                            If you were going to make a documentary, why not make it on how and why the Quran forbids the hadith, particularly as people such as Aisha Musa, Fred Donner etc. have shown historical documentation to support the argument.

                            What a waste of time and a futile exercise you are performing to boost your own ego.

                            Roshan

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • B Offline
                              B Offline
                              belH
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              Peace all,
                              There are Millions you can interview who disagree with deleting verses 7-128 and 129. However most of them are not code 19 deniers.
                              Edip, Are you going to admit your disbeliving of 7-128 and 129 in your project?

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • J Offline
                                J Offline
                                Jinn
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #15

                                I'm unsure of why this is even up for a legitimate debate. 19 was not required before Khalifa to believe in God, and shouldn't be required after. It's a nice little numbers game but is not important in the scope of Islam.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • H Offline
                                  H Offline
                                  hope4
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #16

                                  Peace all,
                                  There are Millions you can interview who disagree with deleting verses 7-128 and 129. However most of them are not code 19 deniers.
                                  Edip, Are you going to admit your disbeliving of 7-128 and 129 in your project?

                                  I believe it was 9128 and 129

                                  Peace

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • M Offline
                                    M Offline
                                    Meteora
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #17

                                    I really don't see what on Earth is the problem. Code 19 or denier of both code AND extra-Quranic teachings, don't we still just believe in the Quran?

                                    Is it really a big deal that one group are skeptical of two verses (out of about 6340) pretty much repeating what is stated elsewhere in the Quran, that God sent us a messenger (Muhammad) who cares about us and told him to tell those who rejected his teachings that God is sufficient and the lord of the worlds, and believe in a messenger after Muhammad who brought NOTHING NEW to the table?

                                    No, not a big deal at all. Code 19 supporters and plain Quranists believe in virtually 99% the same thing. They are not the idiotic traditionalists who will mudsling and come packed with swords and stones confronting one another.

                                    It is a big deal when one group of people believe babies must be circumcised, women must have a nonsensical sexist dress code, men can't shave, and married people must be stoned to death for nonmarital sex, among tons of other pagan teachings and general nonsense, while another group doesn't. The similarities between Sunnis/Shiites and Quran aloners (pro and anti-19ists) isn't even close to 50%.

                                    -M

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • E Offline
                                      E Offline
                                      Edip_Yuksel
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #18

                                      Today, one of the most famous American atheists was exposed and literally check-mated in a Socratic debate between me and him on the Quran, its scientific aspect and code 19.

                                      I will write an article on this issue. The docufilm, will inshallah be ready by the end of this year.

                                      Peace,
                                      Edip

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • K Offline
                                        K Offline
                                        KDC501
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #19

                                        I really don't see what on Earth is the problem. Code 19 or denier of both code AND extra-Quranic teachings, don't we still just believe in the Quran?

                                        Is it really a big deal that one group are skeptical of two verses (out of about 6340) pretty much repeating what is stated elsewhere in the Quran, that God sent us a messenger (Muhammad) who cares about us and told him to tell those who rejected his teachings that God is sufficient and the lord of the worlds, and believe in a messenger after Muhammad who brought NOTHING NEW to the table?

                                        No, not a big deal at all. Code 19 supporters and plain Quranists believe in virtually 99% the same thing. They are not the idiotic traditionalists who will mudsling and come packed with swords and stones confronting one another.

                                        It is a big deal when one group of people believe babies must be circumcised, women must have a nonsensical sexist dress code, men can't shave, and married people must be stoned to death for nonmarital sex, among tons of other pagan teachings and general nonsense, while another group doesn't. The similarities between Sunnis/Shiites and Quran aloners (pro and anti-19ists) isn't even close to 50%.

                                        -M

                                        Yes the code and the miracles of the Quran have absolutely nothing to do with religious guidance(laws). However what if someone were to ask you ? What makes the Quran unique?? , or ? How can you be 100% sure that this book is from God? ? or ? I know scholars who can write a better book than the Quran. What makes this book any different than the 100?s of other religious books written by literary giants. ?

                                        Answer The Quran is not the type of book that can be written by men. The miracles of the Quran play an important role in verifying the authenticity of the book. If the signs wasn't an important part of the Quran then God wouldn?t have included it in his book.

                                        Sura 1788 Say, "If all the humans and the Jinn were to gather to bring a Quran like this, they could not come with its like, even if they were helping one another."

                                        The Quran is a unique book because of the message and the signs.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • E Offline
                                          E Offline
                                          Edip_Yuksel
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #20

                                          I really don't see what on Earth is the problem. Code 19 or denier of both code AND extra-Quranic teachings, don't we still just believe in the Quran?

                                          I am not a "believer". Those who beileve in the Quran without reason and evidence, believe in many other books and teachings too without reason and evidence.

                                          Peace,
                                          Edip

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users