Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. :: Who brought AlQuraan/AlKitaab? Muhammed? NO!!! ::

:: Who brought AlQuraan/AlKitaab? Muhammed? NO!!! ::

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
123 Posts 18 Posters 3.9k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    Bender
    wrote on last edited by
    #106

    Salamun alaikum,

    Salaamun alayka,

    I am singular.

    This is a compound of Prepositional Phrase and Possessive Phrase. This is about the EMBEDDED/ELIDED predicate of the Verb Like Particle "Inna". A prepositional phrase is neither a subject of sentence nor predicate. It is relating to either.

    "in the fire of Hell" is obviously relevant only after death. Though the elided predicate is visible to everyone who knows grammar and mode of writing of Arabic, but I insist in translation that it should only be from Qur'aan as I quoted you the Ayahs.

    Reading does not mean picking the meanings of individual words. It needs comprehension. And for comprehending a non native text, one MUST know the grammar and modes of writing in that language.

    Can you please show me what elided predicate is visible to everyone who knows grammar and mode of writing of Arabic in
    1032

    Salaam,
    Bender

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M Offline
      M Offline
      Mazhar
      wrote on last edited by
      #107

      Salaamun alayka,

      I am singular.

      Can you please show me what elided predicate is visible to everyone who knows grammar and mode of writing of Arabic in
      1032

      Salaam,
      Bender

      Salamun alaika,

      In categorization of sentences it the the simple sentence. It is news given under oath. Subject noun of Verb Like Particle is man as species.

      It needs a predicate. is not predicate since it is a prepositional phrase with prefixed emphatic particle to lay another emphasis on the news given.

      The elided predicate is visible to rational beings if they know what is signified by a verbal noun which states only action and state without reference to time. The oath is also about the timeline.

      You determine the meanings and signification of and the elided predicate will emerge before your eyes. Please try.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • B Offline
        B Offline
        Bender
        wrote on last edited by
        #108

        Salamun alaika,

        Salaamun alayka,

        I can not find such usage in The Quran.
        Can I say also to a singular person Barakatun Aleikum hmm

        In categorization of sentences it the the simple sentence. It is news given under oath. Subject noun of Verb Like Particle is man as species.

        It needs a predicate. is not predicate since it is a prepositional phrase with prefixed emphatic particle to lay another emphasis on the news given.

        The elided predicate is visible to rational beings if they know what is signified by a verbal noun which states only action and state without reference to time. The oath is also about the timeline.

        You determine the meanings and signification of and the elided predicate will emerge before your eyes. Please try.

        What I see is that the structure of 1032 is the same as 986
        A- 1032
        A- 982

        I was wondering why there is no "and died in that state" in your translation of 1032

        Salaam,
        Bender

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M Offline
          M Offline
          Mazhar
          wrote on last edited by
          #109

          Salaamun alayka,

          What I see is that the structure of 1032 is the same as 986
          A- 1032
          A- 982

          I was wondering why there is no "and died in that state" in your translation of 1032

          Salaam,
          Bender

          The similarity is that both prepositional phrase are about the elided predicate of Inna. "Loss" is determined at the extreme end of time. Going within the Hell-Prison is also to be determined by the end state of a person.

          Swearing is by the Span of Time;
          That the fact is the Man as a species is certainly heading towards loss-worse state at the concluding point in time than the state-position at the point in time of beginning.
          Except those who willingly and affectionately accepted-believed and performed moderate righteous deeds;
          And they consciously kept themselves embedded-tied with the Infallible Fact-Grand Qur'aan;
          And they convincingly kept themselves remain coolly perseverant and steadfast.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • B Offline
            B Offline
            Bender
            wrote on last edited by
            #110

            The similarity is that both prepositional phrase are about the elided predicate of Inna. "Loss" is determined at the extreme end of time. Going within the Hell-Prison is also to be determined by the end state of a person.

            Swearing is by the Span of Time;
            That the fact is the Man as a species is certainly heading towards loss-worse state at the concluding point in time than the state-position at the point in time of beginning.
            Except those who willingly and affectionately accepted-believed and performed moderate righteous deeds;
            And they consciously kept themselves embedded-tied with the Infallible Fact-Grand Qur'aan;
            And they convincingly kept themselves remain coolly perseverant and steadfast.

            Salaamun alayka,

            So now man is not in loss?

            Salaam,
            Bender

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M Offline
              M Offline
              Mazhar
              wrote on last edited by
              #111

              Salaamun alayka,

              So now man is not in loss?

              Salaam,
              Bender

              "Loss" is relative to Start and End. If someone is progressing towards Hell Prison he is even at this point in time in loss. If he reverts, he starts moving towards profit-gain. The purpose of the Book is to incline people to revert from loss direction.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • B Offline
                B Offline
                Bender
                wrote on last edited by
                #112

                "Loss" is relative to Start and End. If someone is progressing towards Hell Prison he is even at this point in time in loss. If he reverts, he starts moving towards profit-gain. The purpose of the Book is to incline people to revert from loss direction.

                Salaamun alayka,

                I am not sure, but it looks to me that you have changed your direction several times during this conversation. That is ofcourse not a bad thing but at the moment I am not even sure what we are discussing.
                Anway, do you still believe that "and died in that state" belongs in your translation of 986? If you still believe so, then be sure to implement it also in 1032 and all other ayaats with similar stucture like 986.
                Even better is ofcourse to delete it from your translation of 986 as you know very well that if Allah wanted to say that, then for sure He does not need your help on it.

                Salaam,
                Bender

                ps. sorry MmKhan for offtopic

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M Offline
                  M Offline
                  Mazhar
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #113

                  Salaamun alayka,

                  I am not sure, but it looks to me that you have changed your direction several times during this conversation. That is ofcourse not a bad thing but at the moment I am not even sure what we are discussing.
                  Anway, do you still believe that "and died in that state" belongs in your translation of 986? If you still believe so, then be sure to implement it also in 1032 and all other ayaats with similar stucture like 986.
                  Even better is ofcourse to delete it from your translation of 986 as you know very well that if Allah wanted to say that, then for sure He does not need your help on it.

                  Salaam,
                  Bender

                  ps. sorry MmKhan for fftopic

                  Salamun alaika,

                  No change of direction; the problem in comprehending the otherwise simple things is only because you are not taking care how the prepositional phrases in sentences are linked to the semantics of the sentence. The preposition and its object noun determine the elided predicate. When the object noun changes the predicate is not the same at both places.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • B Offline
                    B Offline
                    Bender
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #114

                    Salamun alaika,

                    No change of direction; the problem in comprehending the otherwise simple things is only because you are not taking care how the prepositional phrases in sentences are linked to the semantics of the sentence. The preposition and its object noun determine the elided predicate. When the object noun changes the predicate is not the same at both places.

                    Salaamun alayka,

                    It might be that I'm a litle bit slow in understanding things, so maybe you can help me a bit to understand better.

                    Can you please translate for me the next sentence please, it's not Quran.
                    Inna allatheena kafaroo min ahli alkitabi waalmushrikeena fee cold of Alaska khalideena feeha.

                    Salaam and thx!
                    Bender

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • M Offline
                      M Offline
                      Mazhar
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #115

                      Salaamun alayka,

                      It might be that I'm a litle bit slow in understanding things, so maybe you can help me a bit to understand better.

                      Can you please translate for me the next sentence please, it's not Quran.
                      Inna allatheena kafaroo min ahli alkitabi waalmushrikeena fee cold of Alaska khalideena feeha.

                      Salaam and thx!
                      Bender

                      Salaman,

                      Once we are able to write few sentences and read some sentences; we never look back to recap as to what is writing and what is reading. It is always good to go through basic lessons as to how a text is written, rules and conventions of writing and rules and conventions for how to read a text in any language.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • B Offline
                        B Offline
                        Bender
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #116

                        Salaman,

                        Once we are able to write few sentences and read some sentences; we never look back to recap as to what is writing and what is reading. It is always good to go through basic lessons as to how a text is written, rules and conventions of writing and rules and conventions for how to read a text in any language.

                        Salaamun alayka,

                        Is this your translation of what I asked hmm

                        salaam,
                        Bender

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • M Offline
                          M Offline
                          Mazhar
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #117

                          Yes, if only you had given a thought. A thoughtful posture does not mean one is applying mind. Please see your sentence and think if it is what is called writing.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • B Offline
                            B Offline
                            Bender
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #118

                            Yes, if only you had given a thought. A thoughtful posture does not mean one is applying mind. Please see your sentence and think if it is what is called writing.

                            salaamun alayka,

                            handshake

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • Q Offline
                              Q Offline
                              QuranOnly
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #119

                              Salam,

                              I'm reviving this old thread.

                              Brother MMkhan, can you please explain your understanding of this

                              S28V44
                              And you, , were not on the western side when We revealed to Moses the command, and you were not among the witnesses .

                              Who is Allah talking to?

                              According to your theory, the book was given to Moussa but is adressing someone else?

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • M Offline
                                M Offline
                                mmkhan
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #120

                                Salam,

                                I'm reviving this old thread.

                                Brother MMkhan, can you please explain your understanding of this

                                S28V44
                                And you, , were not on the western side when We revealed to Moses the command, and you were not among the witnesses .

                                Who is Allah talking to?

                                According to your theory, the book was given to Moussa but is adressing someone else?

                                Salaam brother,

                                Here are the possible translations of the aayat given

                                • And you, , were not on the western side when We revealed to Moses the command, and you were not among the witnesses.

                                • And you, , were not on the western side when We revealed to Moses the command, and you were not among the witnesses.

                                AlQuraan always refer to the reader whoever it might be. When it says "Qul huwaAllahu ahad" it does not means only only Mohammed has to say "huwaAllahu ahad". When you read it you will clearly understand that Allah is asking YOU to "SAY". AlQuraan always talk to the reader unless it is clearly stated by NAME whom it is addressing to.

                                BTW, my current understanding on this concept that alQuraan/alKitaab was given to Musa is changed. InshaAllah, I will write it down when my Lord allow me to do so.

                                Thanks for clarifying it.

                                May Allah increase our knowledge and guide us on His path pr
                                mmKhan

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • H Offline
                                  H Offline
                                  huruf
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #121

                                  33.8.

                                  And remember We took from the prophets their covenant and from you (singular masculine) and from Noah, Abraham, Moses, and Jesus the son of Mary We took from them a solemn covenant

                                  There are many addresses in singuar masculine in sura 33, which seem to refer to a specific prophet in spexific situation, even if tht kind of speecha, of course, can be generalised to analogous events and circumstances, such as are told in those passages.

                                  Ye have indeed in the Messenger of Allah a beautiful pattern (of conduct) for any one whose hope is in Allah and the Final Day, and who engages much in the Praise of Allah. (21)

                                  Here a specific, defined prophet is addressed, not an undetermined one or a collection of them.

                                  Also 33.28 and others

                                  O Prophet! Say to thy Consorts "If it be that ye desire the life of this World, and its glitter,- then come! I will provide for your enjoyment and set you free in a handsome manner. (2 But if ye seek Allah and His Messenger, and the Home of the Hereafter, verily Allah has prepared for the well-doers amongst you a great reward. (29)

                                  Salaam

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • M Offline
                                    M Offline
                                    mmkhan
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #122

                                    33.8.

                                    And remember We took from the prophets their covenant and from you (singular masculine) and from Noah, Abraham, Moses, and Jesus the son of Mary We took from them a solemn covenant

                                    There are many addresses in singuar masculine in sura 33, which seem to refer to a specific prophet in spexific situation, even if tht kind of speecha, of course, can be generalised to analogous events and circumstances, such as are told in those passages.

                                    Salaam,

                                    This could also refer to the reader, but unfortunately most of us don't take it on us and leave it for Nabi. Allah is very specific while addressing someone, like 3328 which you have quoted below. It clearly says O Nabi, Allah knows how to address to the reader and to the Nabi and to the Rasool.

                                    Ye have indeed in the Messenger of Allah a beautiful pattern (of conduct) for any one whose hope is in Allah and the Final Day, and who engages much in the Praise of Allah. (21)

                                    Here a specific, defined prophet is addressed, not an undetermined one or a collection of them.

                                    I don't see any specific Rasool or Nabi mentioned in this aayat i.e.,3321. If the name is mentioned then you can say it is specific.

                                    Also 33.28 and others

                                    O Prophet! Say to thy Consorts "If it be that ye desire the life of this World, and its glitter,- then come! I will provide for your enjoyment and set you free in a handsome manner. (2 But if ye seek Allah and His Messenger, and the Home of the Hereafter, verily Allah has prepared for the well-doers amongst you a great reward. (29)

                                    Salaam

                                    Yes, this is the proof how Allah address to a Nabi.

                                    May Allah increase our knowledge and guide us on His path pr
                                    mmKhan

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • H Offline
                                      H Offline
                                      huruf
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #123

                                      No his name is not mentionned but still it is a specific nabi, not any person whatever. I am not talking about names, but about persons. The fact that the name is not mentionned, does not make out of it any nabi whatever, but that secific nabi being addressed at that point.

                                      On the other hand, if at a given time there is one that is known as nabi and only that one, the address to a naby in determined form must be taken that it is the nabi that is known as the nabi who is addressed.

                                      Salaam

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      Reply
                                      • Reply as topic
                                      Log in to reply
                                      • Oldest to Newest
                                      • Newest to Oldest
                                      • Most Votes


                                      • Login

                                      • Don't have an account? Register

                                      • Login or register to search.
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      0
                                      • Categories
                                      • Recent
                                      • Users