Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. Science / History / Prophecy
  3. Archeology & History
  4. Israel a grateful servant : He never was a prophet neither his progeny was

Israel a grateful servant : He never was a prophet neither his progeny was

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Archeology & History
73 Posts 14 Posters 3.4k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C Offline
    C Offline
    cleanfox5982
    wrote on last edited by
    #39

    The ONLY people carried on the ark were Noah, his wife, his sons and their wives.

    I Kindly appreciate , next time , if it doesn't bother you ,if you can provide proof from the Quran about what you are Saying / Claiming .

    There were other people with Noah in the ship , the proof is

    11-40 Until when Our command came and Fara Al-tannour , We said, "Load upon the ship of each two mates and your family, except those about whom the word has preceded, and whoever has believed." But none had believed with him, except a few.

    So on the ship there was Noah his family and those who believed

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • C Offline
      C Offline
      cleanfox5982
      wrote on last edited by
      #40

      Peace all.

      " Dhurriyatta man hamalna maa Nuh" in 173 to me are " the descendants of noah"?

      Peace.

      Salam Gd logic ,

      Durreayh in the verse 17-3 is singular not plural , so if you translated it to descendant it should be translated to singular form too not plural , so it won't be pointing to a group of people but to a single person , but this is not the main proof that its about a single person ( Isreal) the main proof is the singular article HE in front of He was a grateful servant .

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • A Offline
        A Offline
        Ayisha
        wrote on last edited by
        #41

        I Kindly appreciate , next time , if it doesn't bother you ,if you can provide proof from the Quran about what you are Saying / Claiming .

        There were other people with Noah in the ship , the proof is

        11-40 Until when Our command came and Fara Al-tannour , We said, "Load upon the ship of each two mates and your family, except those about whom the word has preceded, and whoever has believed." But none had believed with him, except a few.

        So on the ship there was Noah his family and those who believed

        I remind you that Allah sent the Torah and sent the Quran as a reminder of what was sent before it. 3.3 and many others. By reminding us this as well as describing some of the things in it then it would seem logical to LOOK at it, wouldn't it?

        Genesis 7
        1 And the Lord said unto Noah, Come thou and all thy house into the ark; for thee have I seen righteous before me in this generation.

        2 Of every clean beast thou shalt take to thee by sevens, the male and his female and of beasts that are not clean by two, the male and his female.

        3 Of fowls also of the air by sevens, the male and the female; to keep seed alive upon the face of all the earth.

        4 For yet seven days, and I will cause it to rain upon the earth forty days and forty nights; and every living substance that I have made will I destroy from off the face of the earth.

        5 And Noah did according unto all that the Lord commanded him.

        6 And Noah was six hundred years old when the flood of waters was upon the earth.

        7 And Noah went in, and his sons, and his wife, and his sons' wives with him, into the ark, because of the waters of the flood.

        8 Of clean beasts, and of beasts that are not clean, and of fowls, and of every thing that creepeth upon the earth,

        9 There went in two and two unto Noah into the ark, the male and the female, as God had commanded Noah.

        10 And it came to pass after seven days, that the waters of the flood were upon the earth.

        11 In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, in the second month, the seventeenth day of the month, the same day were all the fountains of the great deep broken up, and the windows of heaven were opened.

        12 And the rain was upon the earth forty days and forty nights.

        13 In the selfsame day entered Noah, and Shem, and Ham, and Japheth, the sons of Noah, and Noah's wife, and the three wives of his sons with them, into the ark;

        14 They, and every beast after his kind, and all the cattle after their kind, and every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind, and every fowl after his kind, every bird of every sort.

        15 And they went in unto Noah into the ark, two and two of all flesh, wherein is the breath of life.

        16 And they that went in, went in male and female of all flesh, as God had commanded him and the Lord shut him in.

        17 And the flood was forty days upon the earth; and the waters increased, and bare up the ark, and it was lift up above the earth.

        18 And the waters prevailed, and were increased greatly upon the earth; and the ark went upon the face of the waters.

        19 And the waters prevailed exceedingly upon the earth; and all the high hills, that were under the whole heaven, were covered.

        20 Fifteen cubits upward did the waters prevail; and the mountains were covered.

        21 And all flesh died that moved upon the earth, both of fowl, and of cattle, and of beast, and of every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth, and every man

        22 All in whose nostrils was the breath of life, of all that was in the dry land, died.

        23 And every living substance was destroyed which was upon the face of the ground, both man, and cattle, and the creeping things, and the fowl of the heaven; and they were destroyed from the earth and Noah only remained alive, and they that were with him in the ark.

        24 And the waters prevailed upon the earth an hundred and fifty days.

        Genesis 8
        14 And in the second month, on the seven and twentieth day of the month, was the earth dried.

        15 And God spake unto Noah, saying,

        16 Go forth of the ark, thou, and thy wife, and thy sons, and thy sons' wives with thee.

        17 Bring forth with thee every living thing that is with thee, of all flesh, both of fowl, and of cattle, and of every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth; that they may breed abundantly in the earth, and be fruitful, and multiply upon the earth.

        18 And Noah went forth, and his sons, and his wife, and his sons' wives with him

        19 Every beast, every creeping thing, and every fowl, and whatsoever creepeth upon the earth, after their kinds, went forth out of the ark.

        20 And Noah builded an altar unto the Lord; and took of every clean beast, and of every clean fowl, and offered burnt offerings on the altar.

        It goes on of course and in Genesis 10 you will find that Magog is the grandson of Noah from his son Japheth......but that's yet another debate....

        So yes there were people on the boat with Noah, there was his wife, his sons and their wives, they were the believers and they were the ones saved so any progeny will be from Noah's family as the rest of the earth inhabitants were gone.........this is where you will also find the rainbow and what that signifies. handshake

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • H Offline
          H Offline
          herbman
          wrote on last edited by
          #42

          Peace Aisha,

          I would not use these books as source for guidance, because the book you refer to are simply NOT the Gospel and Thora described in AQ!

          If you still keep thinking these books are the ones refered in AQ, please explain to us

          • why is Lot considered as a drinking man and had sex with his daughters while AQ say he was a great servant
          • why is prophete Solom described as wrong doer at the end of his life while AQ say the contrary
          • why is the OT describing Moses death when he is supposed to have written it
            etc etc...

          Peace

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • A Offline
            A Offline
            Ayisha
            wrote on last edited by
            #43

            Peace Aisha,

            I would not use these books as source for guidance, because the book you refer to are simply NOT the Gospel and Thora described in AQ!

            Peace herbman. Allah gave the Law to Moses, the Law are the first 5 books of the OT, this is the Torah and this was the Torah that was around when Allah revealed Quran confirming it.

            If you still keep thinking these books are the ones refered in AQ, please explain to us

            • why is Lot considered as a drinking man and had sex with his daughters while AQ say he was a great servant

            Lot was a very long time ago and things didn't go the way YOU are comfortable with today. It doesn't mean he was NOT a great servant of God in the same way Moses, who killed a man, was a great servant of God. Only because that is in Quran will you accept that a prophet of God killed a man. If you read the story of Lot you will see it was his daughters that did the deed, Lot was drunk, there were no verses to moderate wine in those days.

            • why is prophete Solom described as wrong doer at the end of his life while AQ say the contrary
              I think Quran does mention where Solomon erred too but I'm about to go out so if you can't find it I will look later. Again he did redeem himself with God. Prophets are human beings too and do things wrong, just as Muhammed did.

            • why is the OT describing Moses death when he is supposed to have written it
              etc etc...
              Did Muhammed write the Quran as you think Moses wrote the Torah?
              peace

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • H Offline
              H Offline
              huruf
              wrote on last edited by
              #44

              After considering what has been written, and rereading the ayas again, I think that what it says is that Musa is from the progeny of those who were in the Ark with Noah.

              Thanks good logic for your answer.

              Salaam

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • H Offline
                H Offline
                herbman
                wrote on last edited by
                #45

                Peace herbman. Allah gave the Law to Moses, the Law are the first 5 books of the OT, this is the Torah and this was the Torah that was around when Allah revealed Quran confirming it.

                Please quote in AQ where Moses received the Torah?
                Can you give evidence that the Torah is the first 5 books and not the first 3 books for example, with quranic support?

                Lot was a very long time ago and things didn't go the way YOU are comfortable with today. It doesn't mean he was NOT a great servant of God in the same way Moses, who killed a man, was a great servant of God. Only because that is in Quran will you accept that a prophet of God killed a man. If you read the story of Lot you will see it was his daughters that did the deed, Lot was drunk, there were no verses to moderate wine in those days.

                This is a valid argument but my argument is that the Sunna of The God does not change, this means The God system does not change neither regarding alcohol or messenger behaviour, also AQ does not gossip a lot regarding messenger's lifes but men do! This is not the perpoise of the book!

                Did Muhammed write the Quran as you think Moses wrote the Torah?
                peace

                This is totally out of scope, but NO he is not the author if it is what you mean.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • H Offline
                  H Offline
                  herbman
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #46

                  @Aisha

                  what ever you think you are right or no is not the problem, brother AlKitab try to show/demonstrate something using Quran only and you come with outside sources to contre argue!!!

                  This lead to endless discussion because arguments are based on faith (what ever you trust to be the truth) and not on simple quranic logic (what is said and not said).

                  Peace

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • H Offline
                    H Offline
                    huruf
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #47

                    ?Who thinks Moses wrote the torah?

                    God gave Musa the Tawra, that is what the Qur'an says. Does not say Musa wrote anything, that I can recall, nor did he narrate his own life.
                    Whoever wrote his biography as per the Bible was certainly not Musa nor God.

                    Salaam

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • A Offline
                      A Offline
                      Ayisha
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #48

                      @Aisha

                      what ever you think you are right or no is not the problem, brother AlKitab try to show/demonstrate something using Quran only and you come with outside sources to contre argue!!!

                      This lead to endless discussion because arguments are based on faith (what ever you trust to be the truth) and not on simple quranic logic (what is said and not said).

                      Peace

                      Oooh no, I am not arguing, my apologies I was trying to help in the discussion, so as we don't want a discussion to be endless I'll stay off this one but my faith was in God being aware what was in the Torah when Quran was recited and hence mentioning it a few many times.

                      But of course the whole thing has been corrupted as per hadith claim right? peace

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • H Offline
                        H Offline
                        huruf
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #49

                        I have the impression that Ayisha uses the Qur'an JUST to legitimate the Torash, not the Tawrah, and after that, once established that the Qur'an blesses the Torah, not the Tawra, forget the Qur'an and keep using only the bible as a source.

                        So the Qur'an is used to warrant discarding of the Qur'an and using the Bible instead.

                        Also concerning the first ayas of Sura 17, As I said in one previous post, I think that the dhurriyatA mentioned at the beginning of aya 3 refers to Musa. Musa is dhurriyat "man hamalna ma3a Nuh.

                        Salaam
                        Salaam

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • A Offline
                          A Offline
                          Ayisha
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #50

                          I have the impression that Ayisha uses the Qur'an JUST to legitimate the Torash, not the Tawrah, and after that, once established that the Qur'an blesses the Torah, not the Tawra, forget the Qur'an and keep using only the bible as a source.

                          So the Qur'an is used to warrant discarding of the Qur'an and using the Bible instead.

                          What is the Torash? Never heard of that one. Your impression is wrong, VERY wrong. peace

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • C Offline
                            C Offline
                            cleanfox5982
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #51

                            Also concerning the first ayas of Sura 17, As I said in one previous post, I think that the dhurriyatA mentioned at the beginning of aya 3 refers to Musa. Musa is dhurriyat "man hamalna ma3a Nuh.

                            Salaam
                            Salaam

                            Salam Member huruf ,

                            Mussa can't be the one mentioned in 17-3 as being the progeny ( durreyah) of who was carried with Nuh , because Mussa is from Al-Imran and Al-Imran are a direct progeny from Al-Ibraheem , and Al-Ibraheem is direct progeny from Nuh , all this progeny are not from who was carried on the ship with Nuh but they are Nuh direct progeny .

                            3-33 Indeed, Allah chose Adam and Noah and the family of Abraham and the family of 'Imran over Al-aa'limeen
                            3-34 A progeny, some of them from other . And Allah is Hearing and Knowing.

                            3-33

                            3-34

                            The progeny that is mentioned in 17-3 , the verse said

                            17-2 And We gave Moses the Scripture and made it a guidance for the Children of Israel that you not take other than Me as Disposer of affairs,
                            17-3 progeny of who We carried with Noah. Indeed, he was a grateful servant.

                            17-2/3

                            Mussa is not a progney from the one who was carried with Nuh in the ship , Mussa is directly a Nuh progeny

                            If Mussa was the mentioned in 17-3 as being the progeny the verse would say

                            17-3 progeny of Noah. Indeed, he was a grateful servant.

                            17-3

                            But the verse doesn't say that , the verse is not talking about Mussa as he is not a progeny of who was carried with Nuh , Mussa is directly a Nuh progeny .

                            You see the point ?

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • G Offline
                              G Offline
                              good_logic
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #52

                              Peace Alkitab.

                              No, I do not see your point?

                              That makes Moses before Abraham. This is not the case.

                              You are making thing complicated? It is simple

                              Abraham was a descendant of Noah, Moses was a descendant of Abraham, therefore Moses is also a descendant of Noah.

                              Peace.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • A Offline
                                A Offline
                                Ayisha
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #53

                                Salam Member huruf ,

                                Mussa can't be the one mentioned in 17-3 as being the progeny ( durreyah) of who was carried with Nuh , because Mussa is from Al-Imran and Al-Imran are a direct progeny from Al-Ibraheem , and Al-Ibraheem is direct progeny from Nuh , all this progeny are not from who was carried on the ship with Nuh but they are Nuh direct progeny .

                                3-33 Indeed, Allah chose Adam and Noah and the family of Abraham and the family of 'Imran over Al-aa'limeen
                                3-34 A progeny, some of them from other . And Allah is Hearing and Knowing.

                                3-33

                                3-34

                                The progeny that is mentioned in 17-3 , the verse said

                                17-2 And We gave Moses the Scripture and made it a guidance for the Children of Israel that you not take other than Me as Disposer of affairs,
                                17-3 progeny of who We carried with Noah. Indeed, he was a grateful servant.

                                17-2/3

                                Mussa is not a progney from the one who was carried with Nuh in the ship , Mussa is directly a Nuh progeny

                                If Mussa was the mentioned in 17-3 as being the progeny the verse would say

                                17-3 progeny of Noah. Indeed, he was a grateful servant.

                                17-3

                                But the verse doesn't say that , the verse is not talking about Mussa as he is not a progeny of who was carried with Nuh , Mussa is directly a Nuh progeny .

                                You see the point ?

                                The way you are looking at this is complicating it as good logic said. Looking at it your way Allah was talking about Moses (17.2) then goes on to talk about some other progeny un-named, why? Those 2 verses flow together, Moses is the progeny of Noah yes, from one of the sons of Noah who was on the boat. You are making something that isn't there. Allah has not gone off and started talking about someone else, He's saying Moses was the progeny of those on the boat with Noah, which were his sons, one of which became the ancestor or Moses.........and so was Noah.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • C Offline
                                  C Offline
                                  cleanfox5982
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #54

                                  I remind you that Allah sent the Torah and sent the Quran as a reminder of what was sent before it. 3.3 and many others. By reminding us this as well as describing some of the things in it then it would seem logical to LOOK at it, wouldn't it?

                                  2 Of every clean beast thou shalt take to thee by sevens, the male and his female and of beasts that are not clean by two, the male and his female.

                                  3 Of fowls also of the air by sevens, the male and the female; to keep seed alive upon the face of all the earth.

                                  17 Bring forth with thee every living thing that is with thee, of all flesh, both of fowl, and of cattle, and of every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth; that they may breed abundantly in the earth, and be fruitful, and multiply upon the earth.

                                  19 Every beast, every creeping thing, and every fowl, and whatsoever creepeth upon the earth, after their kinds, went forth out of the ark.

                                  20 And Noah builded an altar unto the Lord; and took of every clean beast, and of every clean fowl, and offered burnt offerings on the altar.

                                  The verse 11-40 in the Quran said , he should load two pair not seven

                                  11-40 until when Our command came and (fara Al-tannour), We said, "Load upon the ship of each two pair and your family, except those about whom the word has preceded, and whoever has believed." But none had believed with him, except a few.

                                  4 For yet seven days, and I will cause it to rain upon the earth forty days and forty nights; and every living substance that I have made will I destroy from off the face of the earth.

                                  Nowhere in the Quran is mention that the entire earth will be destroyed after the flood of Nuh

                                  16 And they that went in, went in male and female of all flesh, as God had commanded him and the Lord shut him in.

                                  It's simply reasonable that Nuh did only load two pair of livestock " Al-an3am " not all flesh or all leaving creature , if you count all living creature in the earth it sound not logical that he did so , also however how big the ship is it couldn't carry all leaving creatures in the earth

                                  23 And every living substance was destroyed which was upon the face of the ground, both man, and cattle, and the creeping things, and the fowl of the heaven; and they were destroyed from the earth and Noah only remained alive, and they that were with him in the ark.

                                  It is logical that the case of the flood happened at the time of Nuh was in a determined area not all the face of the ground .

                                  7 And Noah went in, and his sons, and his wife, and his sons' wives with him, into the ark, because of the waters of the flood.

                                  9 There went in two and two unto Noah into the ark, the male and the female, as God had commanded Noah.

                                  13 In the selfsame day entered Noah, and Shem, and Ham, and Japheth, the sons of Noah, and Noah's wife, and the three wives of his sons with them, into the ark;

                                  16 Go forth of the ark, thou, and thy wife, and thy sons, and thy sons' wives with thee.

                                  18 And Noah went forth, and his sons, and his wife, and his sons' wives with him

                                  So yes there were people on the boat with Noah, there was his wife, his sons and their wives, they were the believers and they were the ones saved so any progeny will be from Noah's family as the rest of the earth inhabitants were gone.........this is where you will also find the rainbow and what that signifies. handshake

                                  11-36 And it was revealed to Noah that, "No one will believe from your community except those who have already believed, so do not be distressed by what they have been doing.

                                  11-40 until when Our command came and (fara Al-tannour) We said, "Load upon the ship of each two pair and your family, except those about whom the word has preceded, and whoever has believed." But none had believed with him, except a few.

                                  The verse 11-36 is talking about his community , it says that no one will believe from Noah 's community except those who have already believed , the verse 11-40 is commanding Noah to load in the ship the following

                                  1. Two pair of ( livestock in my opinion not all living creature)
                                  2. His family
                                  3. And whoever has believed ( and they were few )

                                  from the progeny of the few ones who has believed , who were in the ship with Noah , come a man centuries later called Israel , his ancestors were good people they believed in the teaching of Noah , Israel the progeny of those who believed in Noah was also a grateful servant ( and in my opinion because of the good work of Israel and the work of his ancestors who believed in Noah , Allah Favorited his sons above Al-aa'limeen , its about recognizing not only Israel and his sons but also their ancestors , the few ones who believed and were with Noah in the ship )

                                  Comment

                                  Aisha In my opinion You post too much out of topic ,I kindly recommend if you can put it in a separate post it would be helpful for the thread to be readable . Thanks for considering .
                                  salam

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • C Offline
                                    C Offline
                                    cleanfox5982
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #55

                                    Peace Alkitab.

                                    You are making thing complicated? It is simple

                                    Abraham was a descendant of Noah, Moses was a descendant of Abraham, therefore Moses is also a descendant of Noah.

                                    Peace.

                                    Salam member Gd Logic

                                    Did i said the opposite ?

                                    No, I do not see your point?

                                    Witch point ?

                                    That makes Moses before Abraham. This is not the case.

                                    Can you Quote and past where did i write that , and how did you understand it ?

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • A Offline
                                      A Offline
                                      Ayisha
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #56

                                      The verse 11-40 in the Quran said , he should load two pair not seven,
                                      it doesn't say 7 pairs either it says by 7s and of the unclean by 2, a pair.

                                      Nowhere in the Quran is mention that the entire earth will be destroyed after the flood of Nuh
                                      Nor does it mention dinosaurs.

                                      Noah does ask that no non believers will be left. 71.27-28

                                      It's simply reasonable that Nuh did only load two pair of livestock " Al-an3am " not all flesh or all leaving creature , if you count all living creature in the earth it sound not logical that he did so , also however how big the ship is it couldn't carry all leaving creatures in the earth
                                      then why is Allah bothering to say take these 2 pairs of each onto the boat?

                                      It is logical that the case of the flood happened at the time of Nuh was in a determined area not all the face of the ground .
                                      yes that is possible, but does it change or have anything to do with the message? Quran is in Classical Arabic of 1400 years ago, Torah is a translation of a translation of language that is thousands of years old. Because there are some 'odd' points doesn't make it not from God, it makes it that language and perceptions were totally different THEN to what they are NOW or were 1400 years ago. Nitpicking about how many animals or which animals is hardly relevant is it? and why no dinosaurs in any books, does that mean they didn't exist as Quran didn't mention them?

                                      Step back from the detailed discussions and thoughts that go on for a million pages about the grammar construction of a single word and look at the bigger picture. God has pointed you TO these books, it's up to you to believe they are anything to do with Him.

                                      11-36 And it was revealed to Noah that, "No one will believe from your community except those who have already believed, so do not be distressed by what they have been doing.

                                      11-40 until when Our command came and (fara Al-tannour) We said, "Load upon the ship of each two pair and your family, except those about whom the word has preceded, and whoever has believed." But none had believed with him, except a few.

                                      The verse 11-36 is talking about his community , it says that no one will believe from Noah 's community except those who have already believed , the verse 11-40 is commanding Noah to load in the ship the following

                                      1. Two pair of ( livestock in my opinion not all living creature)
                                      2. His family
                                      3. And whoever has believed ( and they were few )

                                      So if it was just a small community why bother taking livestock or any of the '2 pairs' as there would be plenty left after the 'contained' flood in the rest of the earth?

                                      from the progeny of the few ones who has believed , who were in the ship with Noah , come a man centuries later called Israel , his ancestors were good people they believed in the teaching of Noah , Israel the progeny of those who believed in Noah was also a grateful servant ( and in my opinion because of the good work of Israel and the work of his ancestors who believed in Noah , Allah Favorited his sons above Al-aa'limeen , its about recognizing not only Israel and his sons but also their ancestors , the few ones who believed and were with Noah in the ship )
                                      Yes, Israel was of the progeny of Noah and Abraham, he was the grandson of Abraham.

                                      Comment

                                      Aisha In my opinion You post too much out of topic ,I kindly recommend if you can put it in a separate post it would be helpful for the thread to be readable . Thanks for considering .
                                      salam

                                      I don't consider anything I have said out of topic but sorry if you feel discussing Noah, Moses, Abraham has nothing to do with the previous books Allah is telling you those stories from. peace

                                      I will leave you to your circular arguments which after 6 pages are going nowhere as you disbelieve in the previous books which Allah confirms. peace

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • H Offline
                                        H Offline
                                        huruf
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #57

                                        dhurriyatA is accusative, please, it does not refer to Musa, to whom does it refer? The only one I can see that it can refer to is Musa. If it is not him, then please show to whom it refers.

                                        Salaam

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • A Offline
                                          A Offline
                                          Ayisha
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #58

                                          37.76 And We saved him and his family from the great disaster. peace

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users