Time To Change Your Paradigm
-
IS = Idiotic Satanists
-
I was thinking while reading an article.
How do flat earthers explain signs of meteor or comet hits on the Earth surface?
And how about meteorites that actually have been shown to hit the surface? Is GOD throwing down rocks?
Be well
-
I was thinking while reading an article.
How do flat earthers explain signs of meteor or comet hits on the Earth surface?
And how about meteorites that actually have been shown to hit the surface? Is GOD throwing down rocks?
Be well
Peace Bro,
There are so many questions and gaps they have not filled to make Flat Earth a viable model, at least the round Earth model was thought through with mathematical models in use since antiquity, and even though it was not the norm to believe the Earth is round, many thinkers since antiquity hypothesised the Earth is round as opposed to flat.
As the story goes, it took the sacrifice of Galileo Galilei to change the tide from flat to round with telescopic observations made available in his time.
It will take a tremendous effort, and very ingenious minds to reframe everything within a Concave or Flat Earth model, which again will be an approximation, at the moment there is no interest in that, because the Science community prefers, favours and see the Planetary model as correct.
-
Has anyone ever considered the word in Quran used for earth may not always refer to 'planet earth' but has a rather broad linguistic meaning of 'land/soil/ground/terrain' as well?
In my understanding its even used more encompassing in some verses as 'matter', being opposed to non-matter. Especially in those verses where it is mentioned in contrast to 'the Heavens'.
Peace
-
Dear pazuzu
i am really surprised to read what you wrote about flat earth
I have to review many things in yemen theory now. -\Be my guest and review whatever you wish. peace
How could you relate two different things? I am really surprised with the responses I am seeing in here.
No, this should not come as a surprise. People tend to compartmentalize, and take everything in packages. They don?t know how to judge each piece of information based on its own merits.
Like when a Shia Muslim tells me that a female can claim the right to 100% of the inheritance if she is a lone child, and her uncles should not get a penny, I will agree because that is what the Quran says. But when he starts boasting about the ?Ahlul-Bayt? and how God ordained that some man by the name of ?Ali? be the successor to Muhammad, I will ignore him and walk away.
When a Salafi tells me the Earth is flat, I will shake his hand. But when he starts lecturing me about prophetic medicine, the benefits of camel urine, or the proper length of the male attire, I will politely ask him to piss off.
When a Christian talks about the circle of the Earth, and the firmament above it, I will listen. But when he tells me Jesus died for our sins, and how a two-day old baby needs to be baptized, I will have none of it.
If you are so interested in gravity, maybe you should study Physics, as you need to use tools and experiment to prove or disprove a theory, and the tools are knowledge and apparatus of experimentation.
With all due respect, but what you refer to as GRAVITY is in fact an assumption, not a proven reality. It is a theory. I advise you to put aside your bias towards the mainstream, politically-correct scientists and to read and hear what other physicists have said and continue to say about this (I will provide for you the links soon).
What you fail to realize is that GRAVITY, as a concept, is necessary in order for their false paradigm to fit together. How else can they explain to the sheeple of the world how gigantic bodies of water can remain curved and hanging upside down?
From childhood, they drill into our heads such concepts as GRAVITY, PLANETS, RELATIVITY, BLACK HOLES, SATELLITES, MOON LANDING, etc..., until they are so engrained in our consciousness, that they become no different than religious dogma.
When an object falls to the ground, it falls due to its own volition, and because of properties that are inherent to the object itself (mass or density relative to air), not because of some theoretical and unproven force in the Earth that pulls the object down to it. This is why hot air rises (not because it has defied GRAVITY, but because its density is less than the density of the air around it). And this is why ships float (because their density is less than the density of the water which they are displacing).
Their convoluted theory of GRAVITY has no place at all in this phenomenon. However, it suit them because with it, they can pass their lie regarding the moon landing, and the other ?planets?. (Oh, we tried this experiment on the moon, where GRAVITY is much smaller than on Earth, and we will try it on Mars as well, when we get there, since we can estimate that the GRAVITY there is whatever).
But the fact remains They never went to the moon, nor did they see any other planet up close, let alone walk or land any vehicles on them. Their hoaxes have been exposed to those who have eyes, and the world is slowly waking up to their shit-eating and their deceptions. This is the law of God regarding all those who want to mask the truth.
GRAVITY ? PLANETS ? SATELLITES ? RELATIVITY ? SPACE TRAVEL - BLACK HOLES.
When just one of the above deceptions is disproven, their entire system, designed to keep you in the dark and to keep you enslaved, falls apart.In fact the Space hoaxes is in keeping with the pride business Allah warned us about.
You are aware that they are hoaxes, yet somehow you still have faith in the photos they show you of Earth from space. Truth is, there are no real photos of Earth from space, and all you see are composites. NASA itself admits that they are composites.
I believe the Earth is a sphere coz I saw it on TV, and therefore it must be real.
I believe they went to the Moon coz I saw it on TV, and therefore it must be real.
I also saw Captain Jean-Luke Picard of the USS Enterprise get beamed from bridge to Hollydeck.I repeat again No one goes to outside this Earth. NO ONE.
The Occult Masters are trapped in here with the rest of the masses, and they know this. So they resort to trickery and indoctrination since childhood, to make us believe otherwise.
Let me bring to your attention some strange events than happened within a short span of years (from 1954 to 1969). This will give you an idea of how these godless criminals and deceivers operate
1- After having spent nearly a decade of his life exploring Antarctica, American navy man Richard Byrd travels there yet again in 1954, under the guise of ?peaceful mission? (accompanied by a large military fleet of 4,700 men), in what became known as ?Operation High Jump? (please pay attention to the names they use). Directly after this trip, Byrd is hosted on a nervous, televised interview, wherein he makes cryptic statements about the world suddenly ?shrinking?, and that the ?national security of America can no longer rely on its isolation?, and then speaks of an enormous land mass, located on a 2-mile high plateau, larger than USA, filled with natural resources (including uranium, coal, oil) that no man has set foot upon!
2- From 1955 to 1956, Byrd leads Operation Deep Freeze to Antarctica, amid repeated questions by the press as to why all the attention is being directed to the ?South Pole?, when the USA should mind the north Pole, where their Russian ?enemies? are close by. Then, suddenly, out of the blue, the mission just stops. No explanation is given.
3- The Antarctica Treaty is signed, which states that the land shall not be owned by any country in the world, and bans all corporations from approaching it, despite the fact the Byrd claimed it had enough natural resources to satisfy the entire world demand. Is this normal?
To this day, the so-called ?interior? of Antarctica is OFF LIMITS. There is a line that the military will not let anyone cross. They will only allow tours of the outer islands, and the isthmus near Australia.
You don?t believe me? Try flying a private jet there, and see what happens.4- Massive explosive devices are detonated high up in the air, by USA and Russia working cooperatively (in the middle of the so-called ?Space Race?, and despite the fact that they were supposed to be bitter cold war rivals) and they call it "Operation Fishbowl" (think about this name for a minute). And when the press asks the governments about these operations, they say "we are conducting high altitude nuclear tests" (the laugh-O-meter is off the scale on that one). Didn't they already "test" these weapons in Japan? Didn't they detonate dozens of similar bombs in the oceans during the 1940?s and 1950?s?
Or is it perhaps that they were trying to probe at something high in the sky?
5- In 1962, after nearly four years of failed attempts, the USA and Russia declare an end to Operation Fishbowl, and they both go home, their tails between their legs.
6- Meanwhile, NASA is established (by yet another coincidence), and President John F. Kennedy declares that the Americans shall make walking on the moon their priority.
I don't know about you, but I smell bullshit.
There is no South Pole. In 1956, they found the Dome that surrounds us, and they don?t want us to know about it. And the treaty that was signed was various, supposedly rival powers, plus the total collaboration and secrecy of the operations, prove that the world we live in is fake, staged, and ruled by a band of Occultists who will go to any length necessary to deny the presence of God, and keep the masses busy with engineered wars, false flag terrorism, delusional pseudo-sciences, and economic slavery.
To those who haven?t seen it yet
https//www.youtube.com/watch?v=kn0K4TOHLzg
Stanley Kubrick tried to tell us something, in 1968
https//www.youtube.com/watch?v=excskT6ix_g
Pazuzu has the picture of Pazuzu the Demon from the Exorcist movie, seen in a really fast flash.
Pazuzu is not a demon.
Don?t fall for the hype of the biased ?archeologists?, who unearthed ancient tablets from Mesopotamia, and instantly became ?know-it-alls?. Don?t fall for them when they flash their lizard smiles at the camera, as they ?interpret? the culture which they have been stealing and obliterating. The yare the true demons of this world.?Pazuzu? was the personification of a natural phenomenon (storms and locusts), no different than Enlil, Enu, Lamashtu, Adad, etc...
https//rennyo01.wordpress.com/2010/06/09/exorcist-misconceptions-addressed/
Peace.
-
Ardh means literally what "is solidly visible" and refers to the world as it is. It is a general expression for the world and land around you including what is on it.
The commonly used word in English is probably derived from that word a long time ago, i.e. Earth.
Matter is probably in the word that refers to thing or matter.
Be well
-
Has anyone ever considered the word in Quran used for earth may not always refer to 'planet earth' but has a rather broad linguistic meaning of 'land/soil/ground/terrain' as well?
In my understanding its even used more encompassing in some verses as 'matter', being opposed to non-matter. Especially in those verses where it is mentioned in contrast to 'the Heavens'.
Peace
Yes ardh can also mean land, with plural aradhi, lands, as always it depends on the context of the verse.
but when it refers to Earth, it uses the definite article, Al Al Ardh.
there is also a verse, I cannot recall which, landing itself to mean that Allah created Earth and several others like it.
the model pazuzu is pushing is an infinite plane of ice, with domes protruding, each being an Earth, it is interesting, even fascinating, but not supported by evidence or mathematical / physical models...
Salaam
-
What surprises me most is the denial we are capable to go to space. One can see the ISS with the naked eye for crying out loud.
I am a really big Kubrick fan and I know it's not true Kubrick hoaxed the moon landing. Its impossible he did for many reasons.
Filmmaker Stanley Kubrick is accused of having produced much of the footage for Apollos 11 and 12, presumably because he had just directed 2001 A Space Odyssey, which is partly set on the Moon and featured advanced special effects. It has been claimed that when 2001 was in post-production in early 1968, NASA secretly approached Kubrick to direct the first three Moon landings. The launch and splashdown would be real but the spacecraft would stay in Earth orbit and fake footage broadcast as "live from the Moon." No evidence was offered for this theory, which overlooks many facts. For example, 2001 was released before the first Apollo landing and Kubrick's depiction of the Moon's surface is much different from its appearance in Apollo video, film and photography. Kubrick did hire Frederick Ordway and Harry Lange, both of whom had worked for NASA and major aerospace contractors, to work with him on 2001. Kubrick also used some 50 mm f/0.7 lenses that were left over from a batch made by Zeiss for NASA. However, Kubrick only got this lens for Barry Lyndon (1975). The lens was originally a still-photo lens and needed changes to be used for motion filming.
The mockumentary based on this idea, Dark Side of the Moon, could have fueled the conspiracy theory. This French mockumentary, directed by William Karel, was originally aired on Arte channel in 2002 with the title Op?ration Lune. It parodies conspiracy theories with faked interviews, stories of assassinations of Stanley Kubrick's assistants by the CIA, and a variety of conspicuous mistakes, puns and references to old movie characters, inserted through the film as clues for the viewer. Nevertheless,Op?ration Lune is still taken at face value by some conspiracy believers.
There was a similar hoax article, originally posted as a joke, but which has been quoted as in earnest by Clyde Lewis
Peace
-
@pazuzu
why are there earth quakes, and volcanoes? angry demons?
all theoretical models have their limits, density and force are closely linked, we can measure force, it is a good model to predict phenomena, and most our industries are based on it, there is also electricity, magnetism, etc, all accounted for...
similarly, the flat earth model is also an approximation.
is it closer to reality than a planetary model?
I am not convinced.
It takes a lot of convincing to get humans cooperating on small issues, I do not buy it that Russians, Americans, Indians and Chinese will not have Scientists coming forward denouncing what you are telling is going on.
Your obsession with the paedophile Stanley Kubrick is disconcerting.
-
@pazuzu salaam,
further, 3 points
-
since the "renaissance" and the current implementation of modern Science, there has been an acceleration in development of means to marshal the environment, this is how I appraise a paradigm, its practical success, the church with its clinging to old models of nature failed, this current model we are using has been a success.
-
that Antarctica matter, why does it have to be what Flat Earthers are advocating, i.e. the rim boundaries of the supposed dome, there might be other things they are hiding they do not want the public to see.
-
if there was a rim wall of ice, do you believe Allah is behind it? whereas he made it clear to Moses that we cannot get to see him ever, until JD, and besides, whatever model and reality, Allah said clearly that those who do not believe will never do whatever you show them, and he specifically talked of an ascension to the heavens, with a day 50,000 years of what you reckon, so so close, but takes 50,000 years to reach?
Try better and harder, but do you have the means of your ambitions, or just second hand reports?
-
-
your credibility has been shattered, you are not a Believer.
What is this?
-
why are there earth quakes, and volcanoes? angry demons?
Peace,
Brother, Its really pathetic to see some irrelevant query and reply in this thread from you,who used to be a rational thinker. As you claimed yourself an ex scientist, would you please tell me which parts of science and technologies will collapse if we believe that the earth is flat? Does the missile, airplane,rocket,telephone,satellite TV technologies have anything to do with flat earth or round earth?
We are only claiming that THE EARTH IS FLAT. We are not throwing science or scientific approach.I believe that FLAT EARTH is the best logical & rational approach toward science.One should keep in mind that, The spherical earth model has not established over night. Okay I agree there are some unanswered issue regarding flat earth model but that does not mean the whole model is bullshit. Its need time.Most of all we are against mainstream SO CALLED science. Let's wait and keep exploration.
If at the end of the day it proves that the earth is round,we can ease our heart by saying that we have verified the truth by ourselves and it is not our by born believe.As far your questions are concerned
Why are there volcanoes? Why do they erupt?
Volcanoes are just a natural way that the Earth and other planets have of cooling off and releasing internal heat and pressure.
Volcanoes erupt because of density and pressure. The lower density of the magma relative to the surrounding rocks causes it to rise (like air bubbles in syrup). It will rise to the surface or to a depth that is determined by the density of the magma and the weight of the rocks above it. As the magma rises, bubbles start to form from the gas dissolved in the magma. The gas bubbles exert tremendous pressure. This pressure helps to bring the magma to the surface and forces it in the air, sometimes to great heights.
It's sort of like the bubbles of gas in a bottle of soda. Before you open the soda you don't see many bubbles because the pressure in the bottle keeps the gas dissolved in the soda. When you open the bottle the pressure is released and the gas bubbles leave the soda. If you shake up the bottle first, the soda gets pushed out by the bubbles of gas as they rush out.
You might try this, but do it outside...
Why Do Earthquakes Happen?
Earthquakes are usually caused when rock underground suddenly breaks along a fault. This sudden release of energy causes the seismic waves that make the ground shake. When two blocks of rock or two plates are rubbing against each other, they stick a little. They don't just slide smoothly; the rocks catch on each other. The rocks are still pushing against each other, but not moving. After a while, the rocks break because of all the pressure that's built up. When the rocks break, the earthquake occurs. During the earthquake and afterward, the plates or blocks of rock start moving, and they continue to move until they get stuck again. The spot underground where the rock breaks is called the focus of the earthquake. The place right above the focus (on top of the ground) is called the epicenter of the earthquake.
Try this little experiment
Break a block of foam rubber in half.
Put the pieces on a smooth table.
Put the rough edges of the foam rubber pieces together.
While pushing the two pieces together lightly, push one piece away from you along the table top while pulling the other piece toward you. See how they stick?
Keep pushing and pulling smoothly.Soon a little bit of foam rubber along the crack (the fault) will break and the two pieces will suddenly slip past each other. That sudden breaking of the foam rubber is the earthquake. That's just what happens along a strike-slip fault.
Earthquake-like seismic waves can also be caused by explosions underground. These explosions may be set off to break rock while making tunnels for roads, railroads, subways, or mines. These explosions, however, don't cause very strong seismic waves. You may not even feel them. Sometimes seismic waves occur when the roof or walls of a mine collapse. These can sometimes be felt by people near the mine. The largest underground explosions, from tests of nuclear warheads (bombs), can create seismic waves very much like large earthquakes. This fact has been exploited as a means to enforce the global nuclear test ban, because no nuclear warhead can be detonated on earth without producing such seismic waves.
Now my respected brother, Is there anything in above answer That says Volcanoes or Earthquakes happen Because of SPHERICAL EARTH shape?
-
@ Man Of Faith
Salaam brother,
Thank you for your thought provoking questions. I know you don't believe in most of the interpretation of Quran out there are right,do you?
So brother if you don't mind, may I have your own interpretation of the verses cited below?1518 Except he who manages to eavesdrop, he will be pursued by a visible flame.
378 They cannot listen to the command up high; and they are bombarded from every side.
3710 Any of them who snatches a part, he is pursued by a piercing flame.
728 ?And we touched the heavens, but found it full of powerful guards and projectiles.?
729 ?And we used to sit in it in places of listening, but anyone who sits now finds a projectile seeking him.?
How do flat earthers explain signs of meteor or comet hits on the Earth surface?
And how about meteorites that actually have been shown to hit the surface? Is GOD throwing down rocks?
I will try to answer this question after you provide those interpretations.
May Allah increase our limit of rational thinking
regards
z.neion -
Peace,
Peace
At least you make some efforts at humility, instead of just dropping the Earth is Flat, as some Flat Earthers do...
Well with due respect, I am always open to new findings, but for now, what is available to me proves to my mind that the Planetary system is a valid model to explain this Universe.
If there is a breakthrough and demonstrable evidence is put forward that invalidates the model, I will of course accept that.
Flat Earthers have been incapable to bring out in the open such contrary evidence to the failings of the Planetary System put forward by Astronomers and Scientists.
Until then, enjoy your speculation and sofa discussions.
-
Salam everyone,
Experimental science is different from theoretical science! For instance, the Egyptians built the pyramids without General/Special theory of relativity or Quantum Mechanics; or believing in whatever the earth is like!
Pazuzu is quite right that Einstein's theory of relativity is not confirmed yet.
When you want to find something that the theory predicts you will tend to disregard all the other possibilities and try to do away with anomalies!
Special Theory of Relativity has two Postulates
1- All observers on frames of reference moving uniformly in a straight line at any velocity obtain the same velocity of light relative to their frame of reference.
2- The velocity of light is a constant independent of the velocity of the source.
How much do we really know that these two assumptions are correct?
As neion zobayed also suggested, human emotions, creativity, thoughts and curiosity do not depend on whether the earth is flat or a globe.
This thread is 42~43 pages long now but I can find some posts as only sarcasm and name-calling, two things that are prohibited clearly in the Qur'an and should be followed accordingly-regardless of the earth being flat or globe!
We need to remember that much of the current physical/cosmological sciences is based upon assumptions made centuries ago. And as I speak for myself, am ready to unlearn what I have learned and accept new theories, even if they are called Conspiracy Theories.
Do you know how scientific community works?! They accept a theory and try to prove it right. When they find evidence that can be provided by other methods and theories too, they tend to give credit to the most popular theory.
We can manipulate our observations and fool our brain in order to see evidence that our theory/set of beliefs wants us to see.
Come on brothers! Let's stop the non-productive discussion and grab a book and read it now!
-
Do you know how scientific community works?! They accept a theory and try to prove it right. When they find evidence that can be provided by other methods and theories too, they tend to give credit to the most popular theory.
Clearly you don't understand how the scientific community works. Peer reviews have nothing to do with popularity nor democracy, but everything with empirical evidence.
Peace
-
Peace all,
when someone keeps bashing scientists as occultists shit eaters, and dreams up a web of deceit aimed at fooling everyone, this is paranoia and psychosis...
sticking to the evidence and the facts, without referring to coded messages from film producers with dubious morality, and artistic painters turned scientific geniuses will be a good start...
besides some of these occultists are not just shit eaters, they are also Satanists, of the dangerous kind, they sacrifice children to Ba'al and sodomise them, Kubrick was a member, as Clarke, I would not wish to put myself or anyone else in the cross hair of such people, unless I am suicidal which I am not...
so given a choice between being right about a flat earth, and not being compromised physically, I would rather steer clear of their mess, and deal with mine own in my backyard, it's their world, they will be be judged accordingly, if Allah gives the means to defeat them, that's another matter, but they control the airwaves, it is Don Quixote fighting windmills, so good luck to you, Flat Earthers.
As entertainment, it might be interesting as an X-files, maybe they'll make a series out of it, to discredit it one way or another.
Ah and it also reminds me of the title book, Rebel without a Cause, only the typical conspiracy theorist finds his cause, in this case Flat Earth, and a nice outlet for the typical hatred of authority from religion and history, to science...
-
besides some of these occultists are not just shit eaters, they are also Satanists, of the dangerous kind, they sacrifice children to Ba'al and sodomise them, Kubrick was a member, as Clarke, I would not wish to put myself or anyone else in the cross hair of such people, unless I am suicidal which I am not...
So, you're afraid of them?