Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. General Issues / Questions
  4. How to overcome the sin of lust/temptation

How to overcome the sin of lust/temptation

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Issues / Questions
108 Posts 21 Posters 4.8k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    huruf
    wrote on last edited by
    #84

    Well, I did not get your idea. And perhaps others didn't get it neither. So what is your idea? You are saying that you felt that some readers did get your idea. Can you explain your idea in a short and simple/easy way so that all of us can get your idea?

    I did elaboragte it further bur it seems that it was of no vail to you and I do not think I can explain it any better.

    Are you referring to sex between a husband and wife? Or are you referring to sex outside of marriage?

    I was referring to sex full stop.

    If you need at all cost to fill in the rest, I will not do that. If people do not consider that sex with another person is sacred, I do not think that adding the magical word "marriage" would moraly or spiritually add to them.

    Legally of course, and usually mostly for the woman's sake and from the human legal point of view, she better take all precautions so that she is not taken advantage of, such as getting the proper Saduqat from the bridegroom.

    Salaam

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • I Offline
      I Offline
      Invalid777
      wrote on last edited by
      #85

      If people do not consider that sex with another person is sacred, I do not think that adding the magical word "marriage" would moraly or spiritually add to them.

      Legally of course, and usually mostly for the woman's sake and from the human legal point of view, she better take all precautions so that she is not taken advantage of, such as getting the proper Saduqat from the bridegroom.

      Which brings forth another question what is marriage? Are arranged marriages and child marriages considered marriage? Just because some ritual took place, people ate together and imams/priests/rabbis showed up and executed the marriage, it somehow becomes a marriage? I believe marriage is the exact opposite of what it is considered. Quran keeps mentioning wife all day. Wife wife wife and wife. Adam had a wife according to Quran. Did any ritual take place for that to happen? Was there any imams, priests or rabbis present when adam got married to his wife? Was there any parties? Did adam sign any papers?

      Marriage is simply a loving, peaceful, fair and long-term relationship between a man and a woman. If any these qualities are missing in a supposed marriage, then that is not a marriage. Just a stupid religious/cultural ritual. The connection needs to go both ways. You might fall in love with a person but if that person has no connection to you, then you simply cannot start a relationship. You will have to find someone you are compatible with. In arrange marriages and child marriages,this isn't the case.
      It is all about money and family name. If the man in an arranged marriage has sex with this so called wife, then that is rape. It's isn't marriage.

      You cannot get married to several women either. Think of marriage as a series circuit. The circuit must be complete, in other words, you must be connected to each other. You cannot attempt to add another wife to this equation or else you'll break it.

      Any abuse or dishonesty you inflict to your spouse breaks this circuit hence the marriage is void. It is a fine equation. This is marriage. A circuit that can only be made by the Creator.The Creator has gifted this equation/circuit with something called sex. This is the only time sex is permissible. This restriction was not made because the GOD is a dictator but for our own good. If you eat too much what happens? Obesity, diabetes, heart disease etc. We can benefit from The GOD's gifts or we can destroy ourselves with it. It is entirely up to us, in other words, free will.

      I believe marriage has been hijacked by religion and culture. Marriage has been completely misunderstood. This magical word "marriage" does nothing but give an illusion to justify oppression and corruption. It does not make sex good, bad, dirty or sinful. When sex is taken out of this perfect equation, it becomes useless and harmful to both parties,both the oppressor and the victim. I'm not saying all couples who got married have their marriages void. It all depends on what was in their hearts. Only The Creator can see into their hearts and may determine whether or not this is a proper connection/equation AKA marriage.
      Religious and cultural rituals have no value to The GOD. We need to put sex back to where it belongs, to this perfect equation/connection that only The GOD can make. Signing a piece of paper or having a priest, imam or rabbi does not create this perfect connection/equation AKA marriage. It does not make sex valid. Only The GOD can make that.

      Now we can ask ourselves, what is sex? is it dirty and sinful? Is it a bad and shameful desire? Do we get it in paradise? I think you can all answer those questions.

      Peace

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • H Offline
        H Offline
        huruf
        wrote on last edited by
        #86

        Taro, you seem to assume that I am refuting something. I am not. I am not interested at all in refuting anything, whether with a man or with a straw or with anything else. I could not care less.

        I bring up something I think may make sense. If it makes sense to you, good. If it does not, never mind. Nothing is lost.

        But I am not interested in refuting anything at all whether it be you or any other. You want to win the argument, I really don't care. I do not get paid for winning arguments nor I am punished for not winning them. My ego is quite satisfactorily healthy and I am too fond of comfort to let anyhting like an argument for winning o loosing to spoil my day. There are enough real problems I am worried about to bother suffering about arguments.

        I suppose you that you want to be thorough, proceed methodically and safely and of course that is praiseworthy.

        However I don't think in these kind of questions one can be thorough in that way. People are all diffrent and at different stages in their journey through life, with different experiences. A text in any language when going through to another and through diffrent minds has to many possibilities of not behaving "methodically".

        There is no absolutely abstract knowledge. All knowledge goes back to our ability to acknowledge it as such knowledge, to grasp it as something that brings light where there was none. We, most people are not magic lanterns that you push a button and glow.

        Sometimes, or many times, we have to make our way in the dark and touch here and there, break our noses against something we did not count on.

        As to sex, as I see it we should take very very seriousy the question about the mithaq ghaliDh. Lust is the opposite of the mithaq ghaliDh. I would say it is tearing to pieces that mizaq ghaliDh. We should think carefully of what we do and have very much self respect. What we do with others reflects what we do with ourselves. If we do not respect ourselves, we will not respet others, same with love same with most things.

        Salaam

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • T Offline
          T Offline
          Taro_Hiroshi
          wrote on last edited by
          #87

          Peace huruf,

          No hard feelings.

          I think you have written some interesting and thoughtful posts in this thread. And I appreciate your efforts.

          Best wishes,

          Taro H.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • T Offline
            T Offline
            Taro_Hiroshi
            wrote on last edited by
            #88

            Ladies and gentleman,

            If anyone want to discuss the topic/subject of sex further, I suggest creating a new thread or discussing the subject/topic of sex in a past thread on FM. As far as I know, there are several old threads about the topic of sex on FM. The topic/subject of this thread is How to overcome the sin of lust/temptation. The topic/subject of this thread is not sex. Let's get this thread back on topic guys.

            Thanks in advance.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M Offline
              M Offline
              Man_of_Faith
              wrote on last edited by
              #89

              Hello Invalid777,

              Which brings forth another question what is marriage? Are arranged marriages and child marriages considered marriage? Just because some ritual took place, people ate together and imams/priests/rabbis showed up and executed the marriage, it somehow becomes a marriage? I believe marriage is the exact opposite of what it is considered. Quran keeps mentioning wife all day. Wife wife wife and wife. Adam had a wife according to Quran. Did any ritual take place for that to happen? Was there any imams, priests or rabbis present when adam got married to his wife? Was there any parties? Did adam sign any papers?

              Marriage is an oath that you take before the Holy Spirit and God suffices as a witness. Marriage is spiritually irreversible and divorce is spiritually detrimental. There are no selfish excuses for divorce but divorce can be pronounced should it be involved "bond-breaking behavior", and the carving of the sin is on the culprit while the victim goes free. A marriage bond should not be taken lightly.

              A marriage is intended to complement two souls, a man and a wo-man, and if there is no spiritual exchange between the two then the marriage is redundant.

              A forced marriage is not validated, it does not carry any God-legal value, and the sinner will suffer for their misdeed, both directly and consequentially later. It may be considered a crime and "eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth" applies, but for who forgives this is better. Nevertheless, the man is not bonded with the woman this way and they shall not be as one body.

              Quran does not mention "wife wife wife and wife" all day, but that is because unauthorized interpreters created their own way of keeping their traditions.

              The old prophetic saying "Man and woman created He them and they should cling together and become as one body" is still valid and there is no such thing as polygamy. The man is not to be separate from the woman and the woman is not to be separate from the man. They should be each other's equal, not 75% man and 25% woman but 50/50.

              When you answer "Yes. I will be with you forever", then let your yes be a yes.

              Marriage is simply a loving, peaceful, fair and long-term relationship between a man and a woman. If any these qualities are missing in a supposed marriage, then that is not a marriage. Just a stupid religious/cultural ritual. The connection needs to go both ways. You might fall in love with a person but if that person has no connection to you, then you simply cannot start a relationship. You will have to find someone you are compatible with. In arrange marriages and child marriages,this isn't the case.
              It is all about money and family name. If the man in an arranged marriage has sex with this so called wife, then that is rape. It's isn't marriage.

              Eternal relationship, even as much as a soul merging, but that will not occur if either part is false and the relationship is poor, and then the couple could as well have stayed unmarried. The purpose of marriage is spiritual growth and if that does not happen then it loses its value and one may be better off alone.

              Yes, you are right, the copulation is a defilement of this woman since the marriage is not valid to begin with and "eye for an eye" is granted the victim.

              You cannot get married to several women either. Think of marriage as a series circuit. The circuit must be complete, in other words, you must be connected to each other. You cannot attempt to add another wife to this equation or else you'll break it.

              Absolutely correct.

              The merging is between two compatible souls. A Rabb and Ramm. Or Abbi and Ammi. Both have relevance. They should not exist together separately just as a person should not exist separately from the Rabb. Either merge or refrain, or fall victim to the Noor.

              Any abuse or dishonesty you inflict to your spouse breaks this circuit hence the marriage is void. It is a fine equation. This is marriage. A circuit that can only be made by the Creator.The Creator has gifted this equation/circuit with something called sex. This is the only time sex is permissible. This restriction was not made because the GOD is a dictator but for our own good. If you eat too much what happens? Obesity, diabetes, heart disease etc. We can benefit from The GOD's gifts or we can destroy ourselves with it. It is entirely up to us, in other words, free will.

              Correct. Sex is a programmed meeting between the souls, they may "soul dance" together if the union is befitting. Either that or the sex is of the Satan and the one or two are of lifelessness. They follow the "automation" of the "programming". Their Spirits do not emerge and grow but is blinded by the Body.

              I believe marriage has been hijacked by religion and culture. Marriage has been completely misunderstood. This magical word "marriage" does nothing but give an illusion to justify oppression and corruption. It does not make sex good, bad, dirty or sinful. When sex is taken out of this perfect equation, it becomes useless and harmful to both parties,both the oppressor and the victim. I'm not saying all couples who got married have their marriages void. It all depends on what was in their hearts. Only The Creator can see into their hearts and may determine whether or not this is a proper connection/equation AKA marriage.
              Religious and cultural rituals have no value to The GOD. We need to put sex back to where it belongs, to this perfect equation/connection that only The GOD can make. Signing a piece of paper or having a priest, imam or rabbi does not create this perfect connection/equation AKA marriage. It does not make sex valid. Only The GOD can make that.

              It has. Marriage was not at all this complicated a long time ago.

              A marriage ceremony is a human sentimental procedure and has no importance to God. It may reinforce the feeling for the couple. It does not nullify any functioning marriage. The ceremony is not necessary for the couple to be married before God but a pronounced oath is sound enough. God is enough as a witness. Even without uttering an oath but with the mere intention of remaining forever and ever together is actually sufficient too. That oath is permanent and irrevocable unless either one is defiled by the other when the defiled one has the right to divorce, but not unless the other part has proven unworthy multiple times and shown repeated spiritual deficiency. One must be as forgiving as one can.

              Married or not, legally or illegally, forced copulation is not allowed.

              Loveless sex is of Satan i.e. the instinct but in Arabic. Satan should be avoided. The instinctive desire for a body at all is of Satan actually even if it is your spouse, but as long as it is controlled it is fine. One should not turn into the opposite and become like the sectarians who get insane in their chasing after evading Satan at the expense of their empathy and flexibility of character. The most important thing is that we are not a slave to Satan. Satan clouds our Spirit perception. Satan preoccupies our minds and this preoccupation must be dealt with. If we fight against Satan then we may fall for Satan on something else instead as a consequence without noticing.

              We need to let our body be the animal it is, but under controlled forms. It easily becomes addicted to physical stimulation and this addiction is dousing the flame of the Spirit and it makes it easy for our real selves to forget. Forget who we are and how special we are. Our Spirit is better than all the the World for it comes from the Rabb's own image. We must remember the blindness that was turned over us which is our Bodies and not miss out on who we really are. We should not succumb to the created contradiction in the World but actually tend the cultivation of our Spirit as the seeds we are.

              Therefore in marriage, the marriage must be more than physical pleasure or it has absolutely no value at all to a person. This marriage is for the person who desires this World and is hedonistic.

              Now we can ask ourselves, what is sex? is it dirty and sinful? Is it a bad and shameful desire? Do we get it in paradise? I think you can all answer those questions.

              I know it was a rhetorical question, but there is no copulation in any paradise as there are no beastly bodies but one is ethereal, and there is no paradise either but "paradise" as is their invention is here on Earth and is tagged Gehenna which is called "testing ground" by the Holy Spirit but literally and morphologically means "attachment to Body" and no more complicated, the word speaks for itself and is based on al-jinn (the Bodily). The function of Gehenna is "testing ground", thus the Holy Spirit's expression. You desire copulation because the beast likes it with its Satan but if there is no more body then this need disappears.

              In fact, the sectarians invented both Paradise and Hell since there is none of them and never will. God does not work that way. People who have "died" and were successful are not dead but alive. All of them, Moses, Jesus, Abraham, David, Solomon, et cetera, they are all alive. Those who have been unsuccessful have never been born at all, dead = dead. It does not matter if they are dead or alive in a body, they are still dead.

              If anyone want to discuss the topic/subject of sex further, I suggest creating a new thread or discussing the subject/topic of sex in a past thread on FM. As far as I know, there are several old threads about the topic of sex on FM. The topic/subject of this thread is How to overcome the sin of lust/temptation. The topic/subject of this thread is not sex. Let's get this thread back on topic guys.

              You are right. We may return to topic. Sex is however part of lusts.

              I think it is already apparent, but being mindful of who you are and where your priorities lie may help you in combating lusts.

              Ah well, that was enough from me for tonight.

              Be safe
              Amenuel

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • T Offline
                T Offline
                Taro_Hiroshi
                wrote on last edited by
                #90

                Peace JavaLatte and everyone,

                @ Hiroshi

                Do you know how to treat the root cause of lust?

                Maybe you cold tell us more (explain) about it.

                To me, it seems that it is possible to treat the root cause of lust and overcome the sin of lust once and for all. It seems that if someone treats the root cause of of lust, then he/she will never give in to lust by doing shameful/lewd actions/deeds (outside of commitment/marriage). Therefore, it appears that if someone treats the root cause of lust, then he/she will no longer watch sexual scenes in Hollywood movies (on purpose/intentionally) and he/she will no longer watch pictures of the opposite sex with little clothes on (on purpose/intentionally).

                In my next post in this thread, I will share some paragraphs from a book that explains how to treat the root cause of lust. I will also share some of my thoughts and views/opinions regarding a paragraph from the book. In my view, "the law of cause an effect" is real/true. It seems that if one ignores the root cause of a problem, one will ignore it at ones own peril. One the other hand, if one discovers the root cause of a problem, then it seems that one can eliminate the effects of that problem. Therefore, it seems that if one discovers the root cause of lust, then one can eliminate the effects of lust (shameful/lewd actions/deeds).

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • T Offline
                  T Offline
                  Taro_Hiroshi
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #91

                  Peace everyone,

                  I have found/discovered another book that sheds light on the topic/subject of lust. The title of the book is The Practical Works of Richard Baxter Volume 1 A Christian Directory. The book is written by the christian theologian and writer Richard Baxter. I think that Richard Baxter's book has some interesting and insightful/enlightening information regarding the topic/subject of lust. And I think that his book complements Hamza Yusuf's book very well. Anyway, I'd like to share a few paragraphs from his book with you.

                  A few paragraphs from page 336-337 in the book

                  ..Withdraw the fuel of excess and the fire of lust will itself go out; or at least this enemy must be besieged and starved out, when it cannot be conquered by storm.

                  ...Idleness is the soil, the culture, and the opportunity of lust. The idle person goeth to school to the devil; he sets all other employment aside, that the devil may have time to teach him, and treat with him, and solicit him to evil. Do you wonder that he is thinking on lustful objects, or that he is taken up in feasting and drinking, in chambering and wantonness? why he has nothing else to do whereas a laborious, diligent person hath a body subdued and hardened against against the mollities, the effeminateness of the wanton; and a mind employed and taken up with better things. Leave thy body and mind no leisure to think of tempting, filthy objects, or to look after them. As Hierom saith, Facito aliquid operis, ul semper diabolus invenial te occupalum Be still doing some work, that the devil may always find thee busy. And do not for thy fleshly ease remit thy labour and indulge thy flesh. Rise early and go late to bed, and put thyself upon a necessity of diligence all the day undertake and engage thyself in as much business as thou art able to go through, that if thou wouldst, thou mayst not be able to give any indulgence to the flesh; for if thou be not still pressed by necessity, lust will serve itself by idleness, and the flesh will lie down if it feel not the spur therefore are the rich and idle more lustful and filthy than the poor labouring people. The same bed is the place of sloth and lust. Hear a heathen, and refuse not to imitate him. Seneca saith, No day passeth me in idleness part of the night I reserve for studies I do not purposely set myself to sleep, but yield to it when it overcometh me; and when my eyes are wearied with watching, and are falling, I hold them to their word - I had rather it went ill with me than delicately or tenderly. If thou be delicate or tender, the mind by little and little is effeminate. and dissolved into the similitude of the idleness and sloth in which it lieth. I sleep very little, and take but a short nap it sufficeth me to have ceased watching sometimes I know that I slept, sometimes I do but suspect it. Aristotle saith, Nature made nothing to be idle. And Plato calls idleness the plague of mortals. If thou be resolved to serve and please thy flesh, then never ask advice against thy lust; for it is part of the pleasure of it; and then no wonder if thou refuse this physic as too bitter, and the remedy as too dear. But if thou be resolved to be cured and to be saved, stick not at the pains give up thyself totally to thy business, and lust will die for want of food.

                  ...If thou wouldst be free from lust, keep far enough from the tempting object. If possible, dwell not in the house with any person that thou feelest thyself endangered by; if that be not possible, avoid their company, especially in private abhor all lascivious and immodest actions. Dost thou give thyself the liberty of wanton dalliance, and lustful embracements, and yet think to be free from lust? wilt thou put thy hand into the fire, when thou art afraid of being burnt? Either thou hast the power of thy own heart, or thou hast not if thou hast, why dost thou not quench thy lust? if thou hast not, why dost thou cast it upon greater temptations, and put it further out of thy power than it is? Fly from a tempting object for thy safety, as thou wouldst fly from an enemy for thy life. These loving enemies are more dangerous than hating enemies they get the key of our hearts, and come in and steal our treasure with our consent, or without resistance; when an open enemy is suspected and shut out.

                  ...Command thy eyes, and, as Job xxxi.1, make a covenant with them, that thou mayst not think on tempting objects shut these windows, and preservest thy heart. Gaze not upon any alluring object. A look hath kindled that fire of lust in many a heart, that hath ended in the fire of hell. It is easier to stop lust at these outward doors, than drive it out when it hath tainted the heart. If thou canst not do this much, how canst thou do more? An ungoverned eye fetcheth fire to burn the soul that should have governed it.

                  By the way, the second sentence in the last paragraph above, seems to be in line with two verses in Al-Quran. In verse 2430 and 2431 in AQ, it commands men and women to lower their gaze.

                  Quran 2430-31 Tell the acknowledging men to lower their gaze and guard their private parts, for that is purer for them. God is fully aware of what you do. Tell the acknowledging women to lower their gaze and guard their private parts, and that they should not show off their attraction except what is apparent, and let them cast their clothes over their cleavage. Let them not show off their attraction except to their husbands, or their fathers, or fathers of their husbands, or their sons, or the sons of their husbands, or their brothers, or the sons of their brothers, or the sons of their sisters, or their children that come after them, or those who are still their dependants, or the male servants who are without need, or the child who has not yet understood the nakedness of women. Let them not strike with their feet in a manner that reveals what they are keeping hidden of their attraction. Repent to God, all of you acknowledgers, so that you may succeed.

                  I think that there is a purpose/wisdom behind every commandment in Al-Quran. I don't think that the God commands us to do something without a purpose. The Quran suggests that our lord created the heavens and the earth with a purpose (see verse 3191 and 3827). Since God created the heavens and the earth with a purpose, then it seems that there must be a purpose/wisdom behind all of God's commandments as well. So what is the purpose/wisdom behind the commandment to lower ones gaze, in verse 2430-31? Is the Quran suggesting that lowering ones gaze will keep one chaste/pure ? Is the Quran suggesting that lowering ones gaze will hinder lustful emotions from appearing/developing in ones mind? If one does not lower ones gaze, can ones actions create lustful emotions in ones mind? And if lustful emotions are created in ones mind, will this lead to a state of lust? And if a state of lust appears, will the state of lust overpower ones soul/self, and sooner or later lead to lewd/shameful actions/deeds? I think that these questions are worth pondering upon.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • H Offline
                    H Offline
                    huruf
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #92

                    There are two waays to teach people one is making them hate inmoral things, the other making them love mmoral things. Teh second is preferable to the first.

                    So is with lust too. We should push forward what is lovable about sex rather than dwell on ugly things. Of course warning is necessary para in ordr to make real lovers of goodness the proportion of raising the good to warning about the wrong and the proportion of encouragement by rearding the good over unishing th wrong should be in favour of the first as much as possible.

                    What is rewarding and worth of encouragement in sex? Whatever it is it will also keep people from wandering to the wrong things.

                    Salaam

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Z Offline
                      Z Offline
                      Zulf
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #93

                      There are two waays to teach people one is making them hate inmoral things, the other making them love mmoral things. Teh second is preferable to the first.

                      Yes. However, the human mind is more strongly motivated by avoidance of pain, than by achievement of pleasure. It's about programmed genetic mechanisms of survival.

                      To do anything, we need to first know WHY we should do it; there has to be a rational motivation, otherwise we simply won't do it. We have to buy into it, out of fear or out of desire.

                      Secondly, we need to understand how our minds work and that we are not victims. We should not work against our mind, but rather use it smartly, as an ally, to achieve our goals. We can do anything, if we really want to. But do we really want to? That's the question.

                      Also, we should not equate 'sin' with something evil. No need for such judgements. Sin is not something bad in itself, but rather it is something which will have negative consequences for us. If we see it like this, we can think about sin and the avoidance of sin more soberly and avoid getting down in swamps of guilt and shame.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • J Offline
                        J Offline
                        Jafar
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #94

                        There are two waays to teach people one is making them hate inmoral things, the other making them love mmoral things. Teh second is preferable to the first.

                        "Normal" people (discounting the Psychopath which is a minority in the current human population) doesn't need to be teached about morality, they have it embedded within themselves.

                        http//cdn.quotesgram.com/img/49/67/581169542-religion-and-morals.jpg

                        They need however a discouragement to be selfish, an encouragement to lower down their ego and think about others. Basically an encouragement or a reminder to always "Treat others as you like to be treated" as "What goes around shall come around". In this context, it is towards the sex partner or (potential) sex partner (or should I say "Sex Target&quot or the potential result of sexual activity (which is another human being).

                        What is rewarding and worth of encouragement in sex? Whatever it is it will also keep people from wandering to the wrong things.
                        Salaam

                        For normal adult people, which possess an adequate dose of healthy hormones, sex doesn't need any encouragement, just like eating food or drinking water doesn't need any encouragement.

                        Fight or Flee, Eating and Drinking and Sex..
                        The three emotions / instincts are governed by the highest ordered part of the (adult) human brain.
                        The first two are key for the survivability of the individual while the later is key for the survivability of the species.

                        Sexual urge rise during the teenage period until adulthood and afterwards slowly decreasing as part of the aging process. Certainly there is no need to encourage sex activity towards children or "seniors".

                        Yes. However, the human mind is more strongly motivated by avoidance of pain, than by achievement of pleasure. It's about programmed genetic mechanisms of survival.

                        Correct, as saith above, fight or flee, eating and drinking has higher priority inside the normal (adult) human brain compared to sex. Nobody will feel horny when they feel that they're in danger or they are hungry or thirsty...

                        And human will kill another human being whenever he or she feel that the other human being(s) brings danger to their very own existence..

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • Z Offline
                          Z Offline
                          Zulf
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #95

                          One thing though that is important is to teach kids basic stuff like respect. It's not ok when boys call girls 'whore' as a general insult. It's not OK to pinch someones bottom as a joke. Some stuff needs to be taught to children, but threatening with religious guilt and punishment is perhaps not very good.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • T Offline
                            T Offline
                            Taro_Hiroshi
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #96

                            Peace everyone,

                            Many muslims (submitters/peacemakers) believe that it is important to be chaste/pure. It seems that those muslims (submitters/peacemakers) who are chaste/pure can resist temptations better than those muslims (submitter/peacemakers) who do not give much importance to the notion of chastity/purity.

                            I have shared some of my thoughts about the notion of chastity/purity in a post in another thread in this forum. I'd like to share a link to my post here.

                            http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9606642.msg380517#msg380517

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • J Offline
                              J Offline
                              Jafar
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #97

                              One thing though that is important is to teach kids basic stuff like respect. It's not ok when boys call girls 'whore' as a general insult. It's not OK to pinch someones bottom as a joke. Some stuff needs to be taught to children, but threatening with religious guilt and punishment is perhaps not very good.

                              It's recommendable to teach the law of "Treat others as you would like to be treated" to kids..
                              Encouraging the development of "empathy" hormones within themselves.. at the early age..
                              Kids might not feel "pinching someone bottom" as a bad idea until they got "pinched" themselves.. thus they can learn by their own experience that it wasn't a very nice feelings to be "pinched"..

                              Teaching or exposing them to "sadistic" things like crucifixion (like catholics often does), torture in hell etc.. must be avoided. It will discourage the growth of "empathy" hormones and it can also leave a bad marks to their future mental development.

                              An example from history..
                              Everyone knows Dracula, inspired by a real historical figure of Vlad Tepez where Tepez means "Impaler".
                              During his childhood year, the young Vlad was exposed to the sadistic punishment of Impalement during his childhood time in Galipoli, Ottoman kingdom (Turkey) where he commonly see the punishment of Impalement of Turkish criminals and Ottoman's "political enemy".

                              Such sight and experience leaves a huge mark in him as such he "applied" the same very sadistic punishment back to the Turks and also his other political enemy when he has grown into an adult. Thus earned the name of "Tepez" (Impaler).

                              Similar story can be found in other "sadistic" historical figure such as Nero or Genghis Khan, all of them exposed and used to commonly observed many "sadistic" act during their childhood years..

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • R Offline
                                R Offline
                                Relentless
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #98

                                There are two waays to teach people one is making them hate inmoral things, the other making them love mmoral things. Teh second is preferable to the first.

                                huruf,

                                I couldn't agree more with you. Perhaps you will like this deep/intelligent quote by Samuel Smiles, by the way.

                                It must, however, be admitted that education is not enough. The clever man may be a clever rogue; and the cleverer he is, the cleverer rogue he will be. Education, therefore, must be based upon religion and morality; for education by itself will not eradicate vicious propensities. Culture of intellect has but little eflect upon moral conduct. You may see clever, educated, literary men with no conduct whatever ? wasteful, improvident, drunken, and vicious. It follows, therefore, that education must be based upon the principles of religion and morality.

                                In terms of lust, there is a very deep/intelligent quote by Samuel Smiles that explains/reveals one of the most, if not the most, important causes of lust. Let me also share that quote in this post.

                                Daniel Malthus urged his son when at college to be most diligent in the cultivation of knowledge, but he also enjoined him to pursue manly sports as the best means of keeping up the full working power of his mind, as well as of enjoying the pleasures of intellect. " Every kind of knowledge," said he, " every acquaintance with nature and art, will amuse and strengthen your mind, and I am perfectly pleased that cricket should do the same by your arms and legs ; I love to see you excel in exercises of the body, and I think myself that the better half, and much the most agreeable part, of the pleasures of the mind, is best enjoyed while one is upon one's legs." But a still more important use of active employment is that enforced by the great divine, Jeremy Taylor. "Avoid idleness," he says," and fill up all the spaces of thy time with severe and useful employment ; for lust easily creeps in at those emptinesses where the soul is unemployed, and the body is at ease ; for no easy, healthful, idle person was ever chaste if he could be tempted ; but of all employments, bodily labour is the most useful, and of the greatest benefit for driving away the devil.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • M Offline
                                  M Offline
                                  Makaveli
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #99

                                  But a still more important use of active employment is that enforced by the great divine, Jeremy Taylor. "Avoid idleness," he says," and fill up all the spaces of thy time with severe and useful employment ; for lust easily creeps in at those emptinesses where the soul is unemployed, and the body is at ease ; for no easy, healthful, idle person was ever chaste if he could be tempted ; but of all employments, bodily labour is the most useful, and of the greatest benefit for driving away the devil.

                                  Very true. You can't change to the better lying on a sofa all day.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • M Offline
                                    M Offline
                                    Man_of_Faith
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #100

                                    Lust is more than sexual desire.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • G Offline
                                      G Offline
                                      good_logic
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #101

                                      So are you going to tell us that lust is a strong sexual desire?
                                      Or are you going to say it is even more than that?
                                      I get it ,it "a very string sexual desire",or do you want even more that that?

                                      Or have you got your own definition? Is it from the "old lexicons"?
                                      Come on Man Of Faith you need to give us a clue since you know. Yes, tell us how much more of a sexual desire is lust?
                                      GOD bless you.
                                      Peace.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • G Offline
                                        G Offline
                                        good_logic
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #102

                                        Taking into consideration that the lust in this thread is not lust for power or for other things. It is a sexual desire of some sort.
                                        GOD bless.
                                        Peace.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • M Offline
                                          M Offline
                                          Man_of_Faith
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #103

                                          Taking into consideration that the lust in this thread is not lust for power or for other things. It is a sexual desire of some sort.
                                          GOD bless.
                                          Peace.

                                          Alright, I did notice that, but I objected still to remark on that sexual desire is far from the only human obstacle to avoid.

                                          Sexual lust is a strong drive which from a natural point is understandable since the human is an animal, at least in body.

                                          Lust as a word refers to anything which gives a strong desire to something and it is not necessarily mating. Lust is often associated with sex because it is very easily a strong craving, but truth is you can lust for a little bit of this and that.

                                          You talk in some ridiculing way as if my words have no authority, but I am not using Arabic lexicons to write and define English nor will I do so. Of course words have an etymological origin and lust means the irresistible craving for something, and often related to the sexual such because it is usually seen as a symbol for lust.

                                          But lust can be on various levels and even a little affection by the instinct is detrimental for someone who understands that spiritual development is dependent upon abstention. Lust is simply the strongest level of autonomous behavior due to the animal origin of the body.

                                          Be well
                                          Qarael Amenuel

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users