Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. General Issues / Questions
  4. TWO STAGES OF ABRAHAAM/IBRAHEEM.

TWO STAGES OF ABRAHAAM/IBRAHEEM.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Issues / Questions
45 Posts 10 Posters 1.1k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • N Offline
    N Offline
    Noon_waalqalami
    wrote on last edited by
    #41

    Topic is about the spelling of the name "Abraham" in chapter 2.
    The manuscript you posted does not contain chapter 2.[

    peace -- already posted ch 2 older manuscripts and you posted other chapters, therefore.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • I Offline
      I Offline
      ibn_a
      wrote on last edited by
      #42

      Salaam,

      not oldest makes no difference if spelled with/without ya or written in English.

      Peace Noon,

      Oldest, older continuously changing your definition of oldest.

      I think it is not wise / prudent to rule out that the particular spelling of certain words in the Quran is part of revelation and has purposes and meanings we don't know yet.

      Example when the scribes were writing this 961

      They must have had instructions, a source, otherwise why would they write

      bismi allah without Alif and bismi rabbika with Alif

      The spelling of the name Abraham without the letter "ya
      in chapter 2, and Abraham with the letter "ya " in the rest of the Quran seems intended and for a reason.

      It is more likely that original was spelled without "ya " in chapter 2 and with "ya " in the 24 other chapters, and that some scribes added the letter "ya " in chapter 2 to conform to the rest of the manuscript, "thinking they were correcting an error" of previous scribes, while this particular spelling seems intended.
      In some "oldest manuscripts" with "ya "and in others whithout "ya " in chapter 2.

      peace -- already posted ch 2 older manuscripts and you posted other chapters, therefore.

      First you post this manuscript carbon dating 662-765, 2 (95,4%)

      Peace, in oldest manuscripts spelled same with (ya) e.g. 22603 Ibrahim

      https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/2/vers/260?handschrift=163

      https//s15.postimg.cc/7wg2beth7/ch2v259-266-2.jpg

      Then this manuscript date 700-1000

      Peace, is this about numerology why in oldest manuscripts it's spelled the same?

      https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/2/vers/260?handschrift=878

      https//s15.postimg.cc/55kokatrf/ch2v259-261.jpg

      And this manuscriptdate 2nd century

      They did it 100+ years later; how many examples old manuscripts do you need -- one should suffice?

      Sana manuscript 2nd century!

      https//s22.postimg.cc/50fx9kb4x/Sana_ch2v120-125-2.jpg

      Then you post (links to) manuscripts that don't contain chapter 2, not sure what you want to prove by this.

      Do you know how statistical probability dating works?
      MA VI 165 Quran 95.4% probability between 649-675 CE
      http//idb.ub.uni-tuebingen.de/diglit/MaVI165

      No chapter 2 in this manuscript.

      Birmingham Quran 95.4% probability between 568-645 CE
      http//www.birmingham.ac.uk/facilities/cadbury/quran-manuscript/index.aspx

      No chapter 2 in this manuscript.

      peace, again use "the oldest" manuscripts e.g. this one spread across two libraries.

      https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/20/vers/1?handschrift=281

      Birmingham, Cadbury Research Library (University of Birmingham) Islamic Arabic 1572
      9 sheets - 33.3 x 24.5 cm.mm - fol. 1 and 7 (= 1572a) 568-645, 2 (95.4%) ; fol. 2-6, 8 and 9 (= 1572b) before 750 (?) Parchment - Cadbury Research Library (University of Birmingham) (Birmingham, UK) - 004 129-004 152; 004 153-005 027; 006 074-006 122; 006 122-006 143; 018 017-018 031; 019 091-020 030 - 22-30 lines

      https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/11/vers/75?handschrift=158

      Paris, National Library of France Arabic 328 (c)
      16 sheets - 333x245mm - Radiocarbon measurement of the Birmingham Fragment Islamic Arabic 1572 (a), originally from the same code 568-645 CE (95.4%) - parchment - Biblioth?que nationale de France (Paris, FR) - 010 035 009-010 048 007; 010 049 000-011 110 000; 020 099 000-020 113 000; 020 117 000-020 128 000; 020 131 000-022 058 000; 022 062 000-023 027 000 - 24-25 lines

      No chapter2 in this manuscript.


      Compare to the (links to) manuscripts that i posted
      I think it is difficult to maintain your claim that in "oldest" manuscripts the name Abraham was spelled with the letter "ya .

      This manuscrpt, date 700-850

      https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/2/vers/126/handschrift/170
      2126 I B R H M
      2127 I B R H M

      https//i.imgur.com/E1rYxDu.png

      This manuscrpt, date 700-900

      In this manuscript in chapter 2 the word Ibrahim is also spelled IBRHM

      https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/2/vers/124?handschrift=428
      ....

      https//i.imgur.com/ZmgdsXt.png

      This manuscrpt, date
      .... radiocarbon analysis under the auspices of the Corpus Coranicum project and has been dated to 652-763 CE with 95.4% probability, with that range being broken down into a 89.3% probability that it dates to between 652 and 694 CE and a 6.1% probability that it dates to between 747 and 763 CE....

      Manuscript( arabe331)

      Chapter 2

      https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/2/vers/125/handschrift/32

      https//i.imgur.com/IWRORSB.png

      Allah knows best.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • N Offline
        N Offline
        Noon_waalqalami
        wrote on last edited by
        #43

        Oldest, older continuously changing your definition of oldest.

        peace -- simple definition (specific age) e.g. manuscript is older than another manuscript.

        They must have had instructions, a source, otherwise why would they write

        off topic, perhaps open a separate topic on word to peruse.

        First you post this manuscript carbon dating ? 662-765, 2 (95,4%)

        yes an example containing chapter 2

        Then you post (links to) manuscripts that don't contain chapter 2, not sure what you want to prove by this.

        yes in response to your example which did not contain chapter 2.
        likewise my example was ~100+ years older than your example.

        Birmingham, Cadbury Research Library (University of Birmingham) Islamic Arabic 1572
        9 sheets - 33.3 x 24.5 cm.mm - fol. 1 and 7 (= 1572a) 568-645, 2 (95.4%)

        Paris, National Library of France Arabic 328 (c)
        16 sheets - 333x245mm - Radiocarbon measurement of the Birmingham Fragment Islamic Arabic 1572 (a), originally from the same code 568-645 CE (95.4%)

        Compare to the (links to) manuscripts that i posted

        This manuscrpt, date 700-850

        This manuscrpt, date 700-900

        This manuscrpt, date
        .... radiocarbon analysis under the auspices of the Corpus Coranicum project and has been dated to 652-763 CE with 95.4% probability, with that range being broken down into a 89.3% probability that it dates to between 652 and 694 CE and a 6.1% probability that it dates to between 747 and 763 CE....

        that is how you confuse people by sandwiching example which does not contain chapter 2.

        conclusion few examples written with/without ya should suffice that it was not a big deal.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • I Offline
          I Offline
          ibn_a
          wrote on last edited by
          #44

          Salaam,

          yes in response to your example which did not contain chapter 2.

          Peace Noon,

          I did not post a manuscript that does not contain chapter 2 .

          likewise my example was ~100+ years older than your example.

          • This is the oldest manuscript ( that contains chapter 2 ) that you posted

          Berlin, Staatsbibliothek Wetzstein II 1913 (Ahlwardt 305)
          https//corpuscoranicum.de/handschriften/index/sure/2/vers/260?handschrift=163
          95.4% statistical probability dated between 662-765 CE

          • This is the oldest manuscript that i posted

          ...
          radiocarbon analysis under the auspices of the Corpus Coranicum project and has been dated to 652-763 CE with 95.4% probability,
          ...

          https//www.islamic-awareness.org/quran/text/mss/arabe331.html

          Where do you see " ~100+ years older "?


          Birmingham, Cadbury Research Library (University of Birmingham) Islamic Arabic 1572
          9 sheets - 33.3 x 24.5 cm.mm - fol. 1 and 7 (= 1572a) 568-645, 2 (95.4%)

          Paris, National Library of France Arabic 328 (c)
          16 sheets - 333x245mm - Radiocarbon measurement of the Birmingham Fragment Islamic Arabic 1572 (a), originally from the same code 568-645 CE (95.4%)

          ^^^ This manuscript does not contain chapter 2, therefore irrelevant !!!


          that is how you confuse people by sandwiching example which does not contain chapter 2.

          Confusion is when you post 3 manuscripts that do not contain chapter 2.

          conclusion few examples written with/without ya should suffice that it was not a big deal.

          If the particular spelling of the name Abraham in chapter 2 is part of revelation and preserved in the current hafs manuscript, then it has a purpose, and this purpose would be lost if the letter ya was added.

          Allah knows best.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • I Offline
            I Offline
            ibn_a
            wrote on last edited by
            #45

            Salaam,

            Salaam,

            Qiraa'a ( reading ) Hichaam an ibn Amer.
            رواية هشام عن ابن عامر

            Chapter 2 " IBRAHAAMA" ابرهم

            Audio

            http//dl.islamweb.net/audiopath/Audio3/quran/MeftahAlstunai/HishamIbnAmer/002.mp3

            04151 ---------> 04752

            Chapter 2 verse 124 to verse 140, you will hear 11 occurrences of " IBRAHAAMA" ابرهم

            In the rest of the Quran " IBRAHEEMA" ابرهيم

            Example chapter 87

            Audio

            http//dl.islamweb.net/audiopath/Audio3/quran/MeftahAlstunai/HishamIbnAmer/087.mp3

            132

            you will hear " IBRAHEEMA" ابرهيم

            The link does not work anymore, new link here

            Qiraa'a ( reading ) Hichaam from ibn Amer. رواية هشام عن ابن عامر

            Chapter 2 سورة البقرة " IBRAHAAM" ابرهم

            Audio

            https//audio.islamweb.net/audio/index.php?page=souraview&qid=1552&rid=26

            4148 ------> 4752

            Chapter 2 verse 124 to verse 140, you will hear 11 occurrences of " IBRAHAAM" ابرهم


            In the rest of the Quran " IBRAHEEM" ابرهيم

            Example chapter 3 سورة آل عمران

            Audio

            https//audio.islamweb.net/audio/index.php?page=souraview&qid=1552&rid=26

            2000 -------> 2125

            Chapter 3 verse 65 to verse 68, you will hear 3 occurrences of " IBRAHEEM " ابرهيم

            والله اعلم
            Allah knows best.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            Reply
            • Reply as topic
            Log in to reply
            • Oldest to Newest
            • Newest to Oldest
            • Most Votes


            • Login

            • Don't have an account? Register

            • Login or register to search.
            • First post
              Last post
            0
            • Categories
            • Recent
            • Users