Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. Pork is HALAL

Pork is HALAL

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
354 Posts 24 Posters 36.0k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Abaddon
    wrote on last edited by
    #49

    There is no logic in transmutation and miracles. Its pure Intuition. Allah is not one eyed. Stop spreading your "scientism islam". The Intellect is not everything. Its intuition which completes our soul. Use all of your brain capacities.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • G Offline
      G Offline
      good_logic
      wrote on last edited by
      #50

      Peace Mahdi.
      Then,your translation of "Lhma Al Khinzeer is a problem. If you say it means Maggoty stinking meat then what about maggoty stinking fat?
      Surely by your logic if Qoran does not forbid it then it is halal!!!
      Or should I say bring me a verse that says "Shahma al Khinzeer is forbidden?
      Bad food, maggoty stinking food, food you do not like are common sense. They come under "not Tayibat". Eat only"Tayibat" food.
      GOD bless you.
      Peace..

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Offline
        M Offline
        Mahdi_Ibrahim
        wrote on last edited by
        #51

        There is no logic in transmutation and miracles. Its pure Intuition. Allah is not one eyed. Stop spreading your "scientism islam". The Intellect is not everything. Its intuition which completes our soul. Use all of your brain capacities.

        Show me one thing from this universe without the LordLaw of Cause & Effect (is Logical)?

        https//cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/450/1*sQz0YIgFhxizut0aYVdAjg.jpeg

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M Offline
          M Offline
          Mahdi_Ibrahim
          wrote on last edited by
          #52

          Peace Mahdi.
          Then,your translation of "Lhma Al Khinzeer is a problem. If you say it means Maggoty stinking meat then what about maggoty stinking fat?
          Surely by your logic if Qoran does not forbid it then it is halal!!!
          Or should I say bring me a verse that says "Shahma al Khinzeer is forbidden?
          Bad food, maggoty stinking food, food you do not like are common sense. They come under "not Tayibat". Eat only"Tayibat" food.
          GOD bless you.
          Peace..

          It said "maggotty".

          http//i66.tinypic.com/j5b2v6.jpg

          http//i64.tinypic.com/dpzuia.jpg

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • G Offline
            G Offline
            good_logic
            wrote on last edited by
            #53

            Peace Mahdi.
            You said maggoty?
            So Lahma Al Khinzeer means just maggoty?
            I thought Lahma means meat. And Shama means fat!
            So Lahma Al Khinzeer is maggoty meat?
            GOD bless you.
            Peace.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M Offline
              M Offline
              Mahdi_Ibrahim
              wrote on last edited by
              #54

              If it is meat, without maggotty.. then it is HALAL.

              pork

              https//renfroesmarket.com/media/catalog/product/f/o/four-boneless-pork-steak-112-p.jpg

              beef

              https//images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/91UoofRIyEL.SX355.jpg

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • G Offline
                G Offline
                good_logic
                wrote on last edited by
                #55

                Peace Mahdi.
                What about if it fat but maggoty is it forbidden?
                Do you see your problem now?
                GOD bless you.
                Peace.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M Offline
                  M Offline
                  Mahdi_Ibrahim
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #56

                  The subject matter is "magotty"

                  What is my problem?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • G Offline
                    G Offline
                    good_logic
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #57

                    Peace Mahdi.
                    Either you are now pretending you do not understand the issue or you are deviating. If you say, quote

                    The subject matter is "magotty"

                    I have already clarified for you here

                    You said maggoty?
                    So Lahma Al Khinzeer means just maggoty?
                    I thought Lahma means meat. And Shama means fat!
                    So Lahma Al Khinzeer is maggoty meat?

                    And here

                    What about if it fat but maggoty is it forbidden?
                    Do you see your problem now?

                    I am saying your translation is problematic if you follow your logic because Qoran has not forbidden "maggoty stinking fat"!
                    GOD bless you.
                    Peace.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • M Offline
                      M Offline
                      Mahdi_Ibrahim
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #58

                      Who can eat this?

                      dead animal

                      https//www.irishtimes.com/polopoly_fs/1.1748891.1396527433!/image/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/box_620_330/image.jpg

                      magoty stinking meat

                      https//i.ytimg.com/vi/1OMTywqUPvg/sddefault.jpg

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • M Offline
                        M Offline
                        Mahdi_Ibrahim
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #59

                        What about if it fat but maggoty is it forbidden?
                        Do you see your problem now?

                        It said magoty..

                        http//i66.tinypic.com/j5b2v6.jpg

                        http//i64.tinypic.com/dpzuia.jpg

                        not necessarily meat alone, but also to date and walnut.

                        and here is the word meat/flesh

                        http//corpus.quran.com/wordimage?id=35798

                        magoty + flesh/meat

                        so what is my problem?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • G Offline
                          G Offline
                          good_logic
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #60

                          Peace Mahdi.
                          You know you have not answered the problem you have..
                          Actually you are now deliberately repeating the same thing.

                          Here is my two questions again then
                          Maggoty meat according to you is "Lahma Al Khinzeer" yes/no?

                          What is maggoty fat in Arabic and is it forbidden? It should be "Shahma al Khinzeer" if you follow the same translation.

                          GOD bless you.
                          Peace.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • M Offline
                            M Offline
                            Mahdi_Ibrahim
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #61

                            here is the word for "and the flesh"

                            http//corpus.quran.com/wordimage?id=35798

                            maggoty + and the flesh

                            flesh noun
                            the soft part of a fruit or vegetable that is under the skin
                            https//www.macmillandictionary.com/thesaurus-category/british/parts-of-fruit-and-substances-in-fruit

                            so what is my problem?

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • G Offline
                              G Offline
                              good_logic
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #62

                              Peace Mahdi.
                              Still you have not answered my questions.
                              Your choice.

                              Peace All.
                              Here is a summary of my discussion;.
                              1- 6146 were additional items forbidden for Beni Israeel and halal in Qoran. Common forbidden items were not mentioned there because they were mentioned in 6145.

                              2- Brother Mahdi claims "Lahma Al Khinzeer" is maggoty meat. And that is what is forbidden. If things are not forbidden in Qoran they are halal Hence meat of pig is halal.

                              3- I said to brotherv Mahdi the "mahggoty meat " translation is an error because it leaves the problem of "maggoty fat" -Shahma Al Khinzeer-not forbidden in Qoran, hence halal according to the logic he follows.

                              Thanks everyone and thank you brother Mahdi for the discussion.
                              GOD bless.
                              Peace.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • M Offline
                                M Offline
                                Mahdi_Ibrahim
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #63

                                Do you understand the word "flesh"?

                                flesh noun
                                the soft part of a fruit or vegetable that is under the skin

                                https//www.macmillandictionary.com/thesaurus-category/british/parts-of-fruit-and-substances-in-fruit

                                flesh

                                the soft part of the body of a person or animal covering the bones and organs
                                ​
                                The flesh of a fruit or vegetable is the soft, inner part.

                                https//dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/flesh

                                maggoty + and the flesh

                                nothing in verse 16115 says it is "meat"...

                                it only said "the flesh of the maggoty/stinking"

                                Only He has forbidden to you the dead animal and the blood and the flesh (of) the swinemaggoty/stinking , and what has been dedicated to other (than) Allah . But (if) one (is) forced - without (being) disobedient, and not a transgressor - then indeed, Allah (is) Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • G Offline
                                  G Offline
                                  good_logic
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #64

                                  Peace Mahdi.
                                  The word "Lahm" in Arabic means meat. And The word "Shahm" means fat. YOU are now changing "Lahm" to mean flesh including Shahm-fat- because you see a problem.

                                  I clearly see that your translation is not working with your logic. Do you see it?
                                  You have been insisting with others that they have to make sense with evidence/proof.
                                  Here your logic is not making sense. Either your translation needs changing or your logic..

                                  Or you keep insisting "Lahm" means everything flesh,bones , shahm and...When clearly in Arabic they have different names like Adhm(bones), Shahm(fat)...
                                  GOD bless you.
                                  Peace.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • I Offline
                                    I Offline
                                    imrankhawaja
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #65

                                    dnt need to make things confuse.

                                    LAHAM = meat/flesh that covered with or without bones under skin (birds,animals, aquatic animals)

                                    LAHAM/meat/flesh of hanzeer(pig) is not recommended by Quran.

                                    @ mahdi before u go further tell us what is the arabic of pig ?

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • WakasW Offline
                                      WakasW Offline
                                      Wakas
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #66

                                      Already covered
                                      https//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9599591.msg234462#msg234462

                                      The basic conclusion was IF you ignore the form the word is in and Quranic grammar, then yes, you can interpret it the way you imply.

                                      Quote from tanveermd
                                      According to qur'aanic grammar, in the phrases "lahma khinzeerin" or "lahma alkhinzeeri", "khinzeer" CANNOT be an adjective but can only be a noun. This has been discussed numerous times on this forum in the past. Please use the search feature for the relevant threads.

                                      A short explanation is as follows

                                      For "khinzeer" to be an adjective the phrase has to have "AL" before both words or if "AL" is not before both words then both words have to have the same ending of "an" or "un".

                                      For example

                                      "lahmun khinzeerun" or "al-lahma al-khinzeer".

                                      The phrases in al-qur'aan are as follows

                                      "lahma khinzeerin" (6145), and "lahma/lahmu alkhinzeeri" (2173, 53, 16115).

                                      Thus "khinzeer" in those phrases CANNOT be an adjective, and can only mean "pig".

                                      Your reply
                                      It is not conclusive because the rule of the grammar ignores "natural sign", logic, cause and effect, consistency, fallacies etc and

                                      A much better response would have been to show several examples in Quran where the grammar follows your take. There are literally thousands of examples of this usage in Quran. It should be easy for you to find several if you speak the truth.

                                      All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • H Offline
                                        H Offline
                                        hawk99
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #67

                                        Prove by accepting all religions and all gods - live as one nation - an upright man - humanity
                                        |
                                        |
                                        No sectarianism/religion
                                        |
                                        |
                                        Anti sectarianism
                                        (does not attaching importance to perceived differences)
                                        |
                                        |
                                        Non-sectarians

                                        + - sectarians (attaching importance to perceived differences = sectarianism = religion)
                                        + - sectarians (attaching importance to perceived differences = sectarianism = religion)

                                        M-A-THEIST
                                        MATH-EIST

                                        |
                                        |
                                        vs. Calculation
                                        |
                                        |
                                        vs. Finding out differences

                                        +- issue relating to humanity - - > is a human (or being human)
                                        vs. attaching importance (just vs. unjust - an upright man)

                                        to perceived differences - - - + What is a human ? - - - + (true human beings only concerns with 'humanity&#039
                                        | |
                                        | + - issue not relating to humanity - - > is a human ? human being?
                                        vs . Sectarianism ie. religionism, racism, nationalism etc

                                        non humanity issue

                                        vs. Religion

                                        Ibrahim was not a Jew <- sectarian, a religion. . so as Muhammad, not a Jew or Christian because both are religions
                                        nor a Christian <- sectarian, a religion

                                        but he was (an) upright (man) - (showing a great concern for what is right, fair and truthful way)
                                        a Muslim (a Muslim defined as an 'upright man', just vs unjust. . humanity!)

                                        and he was not one of the polytheists <- sectarianism, other religions or denominations

                                        Most surely the nearest of people to Ibrahim
                                        are those
                                        who followed him <- ie. non-sectarian, no religion. . only concerns with humanity, an upright man.
                                        and this Prophet
                                        and those who believe

                                        and Allah is the guardian of the believers
                                        (367-6

                                        So now eating pork, is okay, brickwall enjoy your sausage and chitterlings. yuck

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • J Offline
                                          J Offline
                                          jkhan
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #68

                                          Look Brother Mahdi? still I am on this subject with you with a reason? your view of khinzeer=decayed meat is extremely argued by the members and brought evidence? You knew you were stuck ,? Is your Energy ordering you to consume the decayed meat? Are the humans equal to pigs to consume its own excrement/shit ? decayed meat look worse than that? You think even God orders to eat the decayed meat, Will people it still.. if so that?s equal to consume own shit? That?s far from reality?. Even the people who live in total isolation without any clothing, they don?t even consume decayed meat though they consume dead animals? flesh or blood or sacrificed other than god..? if a human who can eat decayed meat as per your picture and as we all know bring a single human who would do it?. Unless it is you..
                                          When you were checkmate the other day with your own decayed meat picture? you turned to a question bring the verse where it is lawful for Jews the Flesh of Swine? and asking this
                                          ?So your Allah forgot to make haram pork for the Jews? There, nothing mentioned about pork was made haram for the Jews, in verse 6146.?
                                          No.. Did God made unlawful to consume Pork in Quran? Yes? Then who are jews? They are a group of beautiful community calling themselves as Jews.. Further they are one of those groups God clearly indicating that they were given the books of God for guidance.. That was long back before the revelation of Quran? Does quran valid for Jews as well? Yes.. lets work out that? Remember Jew generally spoke Hebrew and the book of God, Thorah is in their own language?But quran is in Arabic?But definitely Jews spoke Arabic as well as their mother tong.. all part of Semitic ?while other jews spoke Hebrew.. but both the parties would have known Arabic.. as per below verses..
                                          515 ?O People of the Scripture, there has come to you Our Messenger making clear to you much of what you used to conceal of the Scripture and overlooking much. There has come to you from Allah a light and a clear Book.?
                                          Now this quran clearly indicates this very book is also meant for the people of the Scripture as per 515? People of the scripture in my understanding as per context of the verses are Jews and Christians who lived close proximity to where Mohamed lived? regardless of their language(Arabic/Hebrew/Aramaic) God spoke in 515
                                          While they have their books, if still quran claim(i.e. God claim) that there has come a messenger and making clear things and that Messenger took quran to clear things and that same quran says Flesh of swine is prohibited? So what is the issue for jews to accept it, if they are Muslim (surrender)while being Jews as culture/ethnicity simply? Btw? are the previous books supports the claim of having flesh of swine? NO?.Does the quran supports? NO?
                                          If you say decayed meat can be consumed and God ordered then you are promoting disgusting decayed food is allowed by the so called God?s books?.
                                          For example 6145 ? ??. whoever is FORCED neither DESIRING nor TRANSGRESSING then indeed, your Lord is Forgiving and Merciful."
                                          Look closely the above critical WORDS?

                                          1. FORCED?. Why one should get forced?common sense.. Hunger and no option..etc.
                                          2. DESIRING ?.. Why one need to desire the decayed / rotten meat?. Is that something to desire for you Mahdi..? or Flesh of Swine when roasted and hanged.. So only under compulsion and not with Desire?
                                          3. TRANSGRESSING ?. Why one need to consume the decayed meat with all trespassing? is the decayed meat that much healthy or powerful attractive to eyes when presented? Or the flesh of swine? So only under compulsion and not with transgression?

                                          Nothing makes sense? but it makes sense to you to call Flesh of Khinzeer = Rotten Meat? You are absolutely not applied your common sense?.Now don?t tell me that this is not applicable for khinzeer..
                                          My previous two threads enough for you to stop claiming again and again as well what is written by all members with logic is enough? but it is your habit? obscure with a veil? btw this is my last post on this subject.. Take it or put it in bin? no grudges?God guides and not me?

                                          Pls use your wits and senses if what you looking is guidance.. if what you looking superiority and arrogance and deception... then it is your life.....

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users