Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. THE YOUNG PEOPLE OF THE CAVE WERE 3, 5, or 7 ? (18:22)

THE YOUNG PEOPLE OF THE CAVE WERE 3, 5, or 7 ? (18:22)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
44 Posts 5 Posters 1.1k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • I Offline
    I Offline
    Iyyaka
    wrote on last edited by
    #21

    Morphological precision
    the name l-raqīmi derives from the root raqama. Just as for the name ar-raḥîm in (11), the scheme/pattern fa'îl on which it is constructed is that of adjectives of the active participle type, that is to say, realizing qualitatively the verbal action.
    Hence my translation by "The enumeration/counting" = action of enumerating/count.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • I Offline
      I Offline
      ibn_a
      wrote on last edited by
      #22

      Salaam,

      Peace and thanks to both of you Iyyaka and Mazhar,

      An other interesting observation that could support the relation of Al-Raqim to numbers, is the second word in 189

      HASIBTA حسبت which can also mean calculate as well as think, etc...

      source
      http//scdofg.net/wp-content/uploads/flipbook/1/book.html#p=152
      (not agree with all what is said in the book)

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Offline
        M Offline
        Mazhar
        wrote on last edited by
        #23

        Morphological precision
        the name l-raqīmi derives from the root raqama. Just as for the name ar-raḥîm in (11), the scheme/pattern fa'îl on which it is constructed is that of adjectives of the active participle type, that is to say, realizing qualitatively the verbal action.
        Hence my translation by "The enumeration/counting" = action of enumerating/count.

        Where is precision in it

        A phrase for semantic purposes is a whole unit. The first element is also definite signifying certain plural number of persons who have something in common, companions, residents of certain place; like it is used companions/resident of Hell Prison or Paradise.

        On face of it this will be ridiculous; "companions of the enumerating/count".

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • I Offline
          I Offline
          ibn_a
          wrote on last edited by
          #24

          Salaam,

          Where is precision in it

          A phrase for semantic purposes is a whole unit. The first element is also definite signifying certain plural number of persons who have something in common, companions, residents of certain place; like it is used companions/resident of Hell Prison or Paradise.

          On face of it this will be ridiculous; "companions of the enumerating/count".

          Peace Mazhar,

          Why not as "Ashaab alkahf And the enumerating/count/ ....".

          And what about the root R Q M ر ق م

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • I Offline
            I Offline
            Iyyaka
            wrote on last edited by
            #25

            Salam,

            @ ibn_a

            An other interesting observation that could support the relation of Al-Raqim to numbers, is the second word in 189
            HASIBTA حسبت which can also mean calculate as well as think, etc...

            => Yes good remark. Another sign given by Allah


            @ Mazhar

            the Genetive case has the main function of being a complement close to name.
            Here is the definition of the word "complement" in the dictionary "Word or proposition related to another word or proposition, to supplement or clarify its meaning."
            It is true that the literal translation is not always easy, so here is a translation with the elements above and in the previous posts

            • The companions of the cave (- who own the characteristic of having lived in a cave), and who have been the subject of a count action,
            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M Offline
              M Offline
              Mazhar
              wrote on last edited by
              #26

              Salaam,

              Peace Mazhar,

              Why not as "Ashaab alkahf And the enumerating/count/ ....".

              And what about the root R Q M ر ق م

              The sentence is meaning less.

              The second noun is in genitive case conjunct with Ashaab.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M Offline
                M Offline
                Mazhar
                wrote on last edited by
                #27

                Salam,

                @ ibn_a
                => Yes good remark. Another sign given by Allah


                @ Mazhar

                the Genetive case has the main function of being a complement close to name.
                Here is the definition of the word "complement" in the dictionary "Word or proposition related to another word or proposition, to supplement or clarify its meaning."
                It is true that the literal translation is not always easy, so here is a translation with the elements above and in the previous posts

                • The companions of the cave (- who own the characteristic of having lived in a cave), and who have been the subject of a count action,

                Meaning less.
                Genitive noun is either object of a preposition or second element of possessive phrase. Pl again read what is meant by. compliment.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M Offline
                  M Offline
                  Mazhar
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #28

                  Salaam,

                  Peace Mazhar,

                  Why not as "Ashaab alkahf And the enumerating/count/ ....".

                  And what about the root R Q M ر ق م

                  Where did you find its meaning as enumerating/counting?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • I Offline
                    I Offline
                    Iyyaka
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #29

                    Salaam,

                    Peace and thanks to both of you Iyyaka and Mazhar,

                    An other interesting observation that could support the relation of Al-Raqim to numbers, is the second word in 189

                    HASIBTA حسبت which can also mean calculate as well as think, etc...

                    source
                    http//scdofg.net/wp-content/uploads/flipbook/1/book.html#p=152
                    (not agree with all what is said in the book)

                    Salam ibn_a,

                    Thank you again for your remark. I correct my previous view

                    • the term "wal-raqīmi" refers only to the people of the cave and therefore the counting of their number ONLY, and not also the time spent in the cave

                    So my new translation
                    have you thought/calculate that (the) companions (of) the cave, and the couting, were among our signs a wonder ?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • I Offline
                      I Offline
                      ibn_a
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #30

                      Salaam,

                      Peace Mazhar,

                      My post were about exploring the possibility, if Al raqim الرقيم could be related to numbers.

                      See it more as a question about the root R Q M ر ق م taking into account your knowledge and interesting explanations about the roots in the Quran

                      https//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=7717.msg426900#msg426900

                      and since you did not explain the reason (or I missed it) for relating Al raqim to a place,

                      and if the root R Q M ر ق م allows for the possibility to relate it to numbers?


                      Considering the different opinions about the meaning of Al raqim الرقيم
                      what is certain, is the uncertainty, seems more as رجما بالغيب

                      http//arabiclexicon.hawramani.com/search/%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B1%D9%82%D9%8A%D9%85%20%20?cat=50

                      الرَّقِيمُ is said to mean A tablet (JK, S, K *) of lead, (K,) whereon were inscribed, (JK, * S,) or engraved, (K,) the names of the People of the Cave , (JK, S, K,) and their ancestry, (JK, K,) and their story, (S,) and their religion, and what it was from which they fled (K) so says Suh, on the authority of Fr (TA)

                      or a mass of stone; (Suh, JK, K

                      a stone tablet on which were inscribed their names, and which was put upon the entrance of the cave (Bd)

                      or the town,

                      or village, from which they came forth (JK, K)

                      or their mountain (Zj, K) in which was the cave (Zj)

                      or the valley (AO, JK, K) in which was the cave (AO, JK)

                      or their dog (El-Hasán, R, K)

                      or the receptacle for ink (JK, K, TA) mentioned by IDrd, but with the expression of uncertainty as to its correctness; (TA and said to be of the language of the Greeks (JK, * TA)
                      and the tablet (K) thus, also, explained as used in the verse of the Kur-án (TA)
                      but I'Ab is related by 'Ikrimeh to have said, I know not what is الرَّقِيمُ; whether
                      a book
                      or writing,
                      or a building (S, TA) it is of the measure فَعِيل in the sense of the measure مَفْعُول. (TA.)

                      والله اعلم
                      Allah knows best.

                      Salam ibn_a,

                      Thank you again for your remark. I correct my previous view

                      • the term "wal-raqīmi" refers only to the people of the cave and therefore the counting of their number ONLY, and not also the time spent in the cave

                      So my new translation
                      have you thought/calculate that (the) companions (of) the cave, and the couting, were among our signs a wonder ?

                      Peace Iyyaka,

                      Thanks for sharing your understanding.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • M Offline
                        M Offline
                        Mazhar
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #31

                        Just read about Petra original name.
                        Root ر ق م

                        Words from this Root in the Grand Qur’ān

                        a) Total occurrences 3

                        b) No of constructions 3 Nouns

                        Ibn Faris stated

                        (مقاييس اللغة)

                        الراء والقاف والميم أصلٌ واحد يدلُّ على خَطٍّ وكتابةٍ وما أشبَهَ ذلك . فالرَّقْم الخَطّ.

                        That it leads to the perception of streak, calligraphy, penmanship and writing and that which resembles it;

                        Lane Lexicon And He sealed, stamped, imprinted, or impressed. (S, TA.) And رَقَمَ الِكتَابَ, (K,) inf. n. as above, (JK,) He marked the writing with the dots, or points,

                        May be the city had beautiful calligraphic patterns which corresponds to the basic concept of Root.

                        http//haqeeqat.pk/roots/(556).htm

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • I Offline
                          I Offline
                          Iyyaka
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #32

                          So to summary we have at least 3 hypotheses

                          1. Name of a place, a location (as Mazhar suggests)
                            => Petra
                            https//www.visitpetra.jo/DetailsPage/VisitPetra/LocationsInPetraDetailsEn.aspx?PID=4
                            => Or, a locality near Amman (legend of 3 men and 1 dog)
                            https//www.persee.fr/doc/crai_0065-0536_1899_num_43_5_71468 (in french sorry)

                          2. "Inscription"
                            the tablet of lead or stone where were written (raqam) the names of dormant
                            As suggested by the other 2 Koranic verses that refer to an engraved compilation, written with the idea of readability and unambiguous detail (diacritics)
                            http//corpus.quran.com/qurandictionary.jsp?q=rqm#(1896)

                          Thus We revealed them to them, that they might know that the promise of God is truth, and there is no doubt about the Hour ... => evidence of the resurection

                          1. "Enumeration/counting" => see previous interventions.
                            Good translation for this comprehension from "https//submission.org/QI#18"
                            Why else do you think we are telling you about the people of the cave, and the numbers connected with them? They are among our wondrous signs.

                          Hypothesis 2 is also very interesting because it is close to the meaning of the root and by Quranic use.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • M Offline
                            M Offline
                            Mazhar
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #33

                            So to summary we have at least 3 hypotheses

                            1. Name of a place, a location (as Mazhar suggests)
                              => Petra
                              https//www.visitpetra.jo/DetailsPage/VisitPetra/LocationsInPetraDetailsEn.aspx?PID=4
                              => Or, a locality near Amman (legend of 3 men and 1 dog)
                              https//www.persee.fr/doc/crai_0065-0536_1899_num_43_5_71468 (in french sorry)

                            2. "Inscription"
                              the tablet of lead or stone where were written (raqam) the names of dormant
                              As suggested by the other 2 Koranic verses that refer to an engraved compilation, written with the idea of readability and unambiguous detail (diacritics)
                              http//corpus.quran.com/qurandictionary.jsp?q=rqm#(1896)

                            Thus We revealed them to them, that they might know that the promise of God is truth, and there is no doubt about the Hour ... => evidence of the resurection

                            1. "Enumeration/counting" => see previous interventions.
                              Good translation for this comprehension from "https//submission.org/QI#18"
                              Why else do you think we are telling you about the people of the cave, and the numbers connected with them? They are among our wondrous signs.

                            Hypothesis 2 is also very interesting because it is close to the meaning of the root and by Quranic use.

                            It is mere wandering in vacuum. You are time and again placing aside fundamentals of language; the Possessive Phrase.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • I Offline
                              I Offline
                              ibn_a
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #34

                              Salaam,

                              Peace Mazhar,
                              Thanks for the explanation, I didn't know that the original name of Petra was "Reqem or Raqmu".

                              أَمْ حَسِبْتَ أَنَّ أَصْحَـٟـبَ ٱلْـكَهْفِ وَٱلرَّقِيـمِ كَانُوا۟۟ مِنْ ءَايَٟتِنَا عَجَبٙا .1809٩

                              Or have you deemed the companions of the Cave and residents of Raqeem as if they were a wonder in the displaying signs of Our Majesty —

                              http//haqeeqat.pk/Quran.Corpus-5Part9Sura15-18.htm

                              In the translation on your website there is no explanation for Al raqim nor a reference to Petra.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • M Offline
                                M Offline
                                Mazhar
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #35

                                Salaam,

                                Peace Mazhar,
                                Thanks for the explanation, I didn't know that the original name of Petra was "Reqem or Raqmu".

                                In the translation on your website there is no explanation for Al raqim nor a reference to Petra.

                                I have just translated. When I explain it by syntax, sentence structures there I will mention it.

                                Information about their residential place/city is also given. Their city dwellers - rulers had gone polytheists.

                                هَٟٓـؤُلَآءِ قَوْمُنَا ٱتَّخَذُوا۟ مِن دُونِهِۦٓ ءَالِـهَةٙۖ

                                Look at these people, our nation; they have purposely adopted others besides Him the Exalted as various iela'aha godheads —

                                لَّوْلَا يَأْتُونَ عَلَيْـهِـم بِسُلْطَٟنِۭ بَيِّـنٛۖ

                                Why not they come forth about the stance upon them with a distinct authoritative argument-evidence?

                                فَمَنْ أَظْلَمُ مِمَّنِ ٱفْتَـرَىٰ عَلَـى ٱللَّهِ كَذِبٙا .1815١٥

                                Thereby, who could be a greater evil monger-a distorter-creator of imbalances, disorder-over stepping than him who artfully conjectured a falsehood attributing it to Allah the Exalted —

                                وَإِذِ ٱعْتَزَلْتُـمُوهُـمْ وَمَا يَعْبُدُونَ إِلَّا ٱللَّهَ فَأْوُواۥٓ إِلَـى ٱلْـكَهْفِ

                                And when you people separate from them and what they worship, except Allah the Exalted, then proceed for protective refuge towards the particular cave —

                                يَنْشُـرْ لَـكُـمْ رَبُّكُـم مِّن رَّحْـمَتِهِۦ وَيُـهَيِّئْ لَـكُـم مِّنْ أَمْرِكُم مِّرْفَقٙا .1816١٦

                                Your Sustainer Lord will expand for you from His Mercy, and will facilitate for you in your matter making it convenient."

                                The destined cave they already knew as most suitable place for hiding. Certain location clue are also mentioned with reference to movement of Sun and affect on cave.

                                This also confirms earlier informative statement about the name of their parental city.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • I Offline
                                  I Offline
                                  ibn_a
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #36

                                  Salaam,

                                  Peace Mazhar,

                                  I can understand your argument for relating Al raqim الرقيم to Petra, because of the resemblance of its original name "Reqem or Raqmu".
                                  Do you consider also other possible meanings for Al raqim الرقيم ?

                                  قُل رَّبِّـى أَعْلَمُ بِعِدَّتِـهِـم

                                  You the Messenger pronounce, "My Sustainer Lord knows most certainly the exact number of them".

                                  In the next sentence the information and advice is for the Messenger

                                  مَّا يَعْلَمُهُـمْ إِلَّا قَلِيلٚۗ

                                  Since except a small segment, people do not know them —
                                  فَلَا تُمَارِ فِيـهِـمْ إِلَّا مِرَآءٙ ظَٟهِرٙا وَلَا تَسْتَفْتِ فِيـهِـم مِّنْـهُـمْ أَحَدٙا .1822٢٢
                                  Therefore, you should not enter into controversy about them except the evidently visible point and nor you should enquire about them from any one of them.

                                  This information advice does not refer about بِعِدَّتِـهِـم.

                                  ... مَّا يَعْلَمُهُمْ إِلَّا قَلِيلٌ ...

                                  Shouldn't it be like that

                                  1822 ...Only a few know about them...

                                  https//www.islamawakened.com/quran/18/22/

                                  والله اعلم
                                  Allah knows best.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • I Offline
                                    I Offline
                                    Iyyaka
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #37

                                    By combining "hypothesis" 2 and 3

                                    Why else do you think we are telling you about the people of the cave, and the inscription that enumerate them? They are among our wondrous signs.

                                    Confirm by the textual context as early said.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • M Offline
                                      M Offline
                                      Mazhar
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #38

                                      By combining "hypothesis" 2 and 3

                                      Why else do you think we are telling you about the people of the cave, and the inscription that enumerate them? They are among our wondrous signs.

                                      Confirm by the textual context as early said.

                                      The bold is a separate dependent sentence while there is no such thing in SLT. Case endings/Irab is the heart of Arabic grammar. It is Ashab-arRaqeemi.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • I Offline
                                        I Offline
                                        ibn_a
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #39

                                        Salaam,

                                        Peace Mazhar,

                                        Why did you go against all translators?
                                        https//www.islamawakened.com/quran/18/22/default.htm

                                        http//haqeeqat.pk/Quran.Corpus-5Part9Sura15-18.htm
                                        https//i.imgur.com/Lhkk7jo.png

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • I Offline
                                          I Offline
                                          ibn_a
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #40

                                          Salaam,

                                          Thanks.

                                          It helped me immediately detect omission in my parsing into sentences. They are two separate sentences. Second not about number.

                                          سَيَقُولُونَ ثَلٟثَةٚ رَّابِعُهُـمْ كَلْبُـهُـمْ

                                          People will keep saying that they were three in number and fourth companion of them was their dog —

                                          وَيَقُولُونَ خَـمْسَةٚ سَادِسُهُـمْ كَلْبُـهُـمْ رَجْـمَاۢبِٱلْغَيْبِۖ

                                          And others will say that they were five in number and sixth companion of them was their dog, hurling imaginary thoughts —

                                          وَيَقُولُونَ سَبْعَةٚ وَثَامِنُـهُـمْ كَلْبُـهُـمْۚ

                                          And yet others will say that they were seven in number and eighth companion was their dog.

                                          قُل رَّبِّـى أَعْلَمُ بِعِدَّتِـهِـم

                                          You the Messenger pronounce, "My Sustainer Lord knows most certainly the exact number of them".

                                          مَّا يَعْلَمُهُـمْ إِلَّا قَلِيلٚۗ

                                          Since except a small segment, people do not know them —
                                          فَلَا تُمَارِ فِيـهِـمْ إِلَّا مِرَآءٙ ظَٟهِرٙا وَلَا تَسْتَفْتِ فِيـهِـم مِّنْـهُـمْ أَحَدٙا .1822٢٢

                                          Therefore, you should not enter into controversy about them except the evidently visible point and nor you should enquire about them from any one of them.

                                          Peace Mazhar,

                                          Agree that ما يعلمهم الا قليل does not refer to بعدتهم , but to them,
                                          otherwise I think it would say يعلمها

                                          but why do you conclude that ما يعلمهم الا قليل means

                                          "Since except a small segment, people do not know them".

                                          Could you explain what other translators missed ?

                                          https//www.islamawakened.com/quran/18/22/

                                          والله اعلم
                                          Allah knows best.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users