Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. Chapter 106 translation

Chapter 106 translation

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
20 Posts 5 Posters 252 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • T Offline
    T Offline
    truth
    wrote on last edited by
    #10

    Your reaction to this honesty is to simply turn your head... shock

    Because you have a false paradigm, you see everything in a false way.

    It's like illuminating everything with a blue light and attempting to discern the correct hues. You end up identifying things incorrectly or not seeing them at all.

    Regards.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • A Offline
      A Offline
      ayman
      wrote on last edited by
      #11

      Peace Truth, MZ, Wakas, all,

      2 They cherish the journeying in the winter and summer,

      their covenant for trade journeying (of/the)winter and summer

      1. their safeguarding/keeping of the summer and winter's journey,

      Although in Modern Arabic, the word "sayf" means "summer", in Classical Arabic it means "spring". According to Classical Arabic dictionaries (see Lisan Al-3arab) the pre-quranic Arabs had the following seasons

      Shitaa Winter
      Sayf Spring
      Qayth Summer
      Kharif Fall

      The problem with using tribal names or understanding qurayshin to be a tribal name is that not only does it freeze the concept in time; it requires acceptance of a source outside to know who the tribe was.

      I completely agree. The Arabs were very proud of their tribal affiliations. Hence, there are many inscriptions through out Arabia that name all sorts of tribes and NONE is named Quraysh. So this cannot be the name of what was supposed to be one of the most famous tribes of the time.

      In the name of God, Ar Rahman, The Most Merciful

      From pre-quranic Christian inscriptions in Southern Arabia such as the inscription of Abraha, we can see that "al-rahman" means the Almighty.

      I hope this helps.

      Peace,

      Ayman

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • U Offline
        U Offline
        unknownuser
        wrote on last edited by
        #12

        Your reaction to this honesty is to simply turn your head... shock

        Because you have a false paradigm, you see everything in a false way.

        It's like illuminating everything with a blue light and attempting to discern the correct hues. You end up identifying things incorrectly or not seeing them at all.

        Regards.

        We show all possible definitions in our exegesis.

        You show zero.

        None.

        No references whatsoever.

        You have no basis for your position....only your hardened opinion...

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • T Offline
          T Offline
          truth
          wrote on last edited by
          #13

          Unfortunately there's been some data loss.

          I know this thread had more.

          Ayman had posted here as well as another regarding the black stone which are now gone.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • WakasW Offline
            WakasW Offline
            Wakas
            wrote on last edited by
            #14

            peace Oben, all,

            Not to worry, I read your post before it got deleted.

            Mine also got deleted. In brief, it said

            I was unsure about the influence of "fi" at the start, as it may tee up the rest of the signs. It may need clarified.

            Also, I asked Ayman how he rendered 1061

            Wakas

            All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • A Offline
              A Offline
              ayman
              wrote on last edited by
              #15

              Peace Wakas,

              literal word-for-word

              1. Li-eelafi1 (for the safeguarding/keeping) qurayshin2 (of the victorious/Quraish)

              With respect to the above translation, "quraish" doesn't have the definite article while in your literal translation "the victorious" does.

              Please let me know if you know of another example in the great reading that can be translated in a similar way.

              Thanks,

              Ayman

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • WakasW Offline
                WakasW Offline
                Wakas
                wrote on last edited by
                #16

                peace brother Ayman,

                It seems that was a mistake on my part. There is no "al" hence "the" should be removed.

                Does this weaken the argument for Quraysh (as in the tribe)?

                Please let me know if you know of another example in the great reading that can be translated in a similar way.

                Unfortunately, I'm not familiar enough with 'the reading' to recall/know examples.

                Wakas

                All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • A Offline
                  A Offline
                  ayman
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #17

                  Peace brother Wakas,

                  Thank you for your quick reply on this issue.

                  It seems that was a mistake on my part. There is no "al" hence "the" should be removed.

                  Does this weaken the argument for Quraysh (as in the tribe)?

                  According to Lane's Lexicon (from your excellent site), QaRaSha means gained/earned/acquired and collected for his family. So another way to render the passage could be

                  1061-4. For keeping on earning, their keeping is the journey of the
                  winter and spring. So they should serve the Lord of this house who fed
                  them against hunger and secured them against fear.

                  Now, like the original passage, both "ilaf" and "quraysh" in 1061 are in the indefinite. I think this meaning of keeping on/maintenance of "earning" is more in line with the commercial activity of traveling in winter and spring. The "victorious" doesn't seem to fit because there is no conflict or war in the passage to warrant victory but there seems to be commercial travel.

                  Please let me know what you think.

                  Peace,

                  Ayman

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • WakasW Offline
                    WakasW Offline
                    Wakas
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #18

                    peace brother Ayman,

                    That translation makes more sense and is in line with the jist of the signs.

                    Wakas

                    All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • G Offline
                      G Offline
                      gclandcp
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #19

                      Salam Brother Ahmed,

                      Peace Oben

                      I wonder why you translated the following into English

                      God
                      The Most Merciful

                      and you left Ar Rahman, in arabic?

                      I think Brother Oben got a point there. Please refer to http//www.free-minds.org/articles/gods_system/rahman.htm . What do you think?

                      Regards

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • U Offline
                        U Offline
                        unknownuser
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #20

                        Salam Brother Ahmed,

                        Peace Oben

                        I wonder why you translated the following into English

                        God
                        The Most Merciful

                        and you left Ar Rahman, in arabic?

                        I think Brother Oben got a point there. Please refer to http//www.free-minds.org/articles/gods_system/rahman.htm . What do you think?

                        Regards

                        Salam brother gclandcp

                        Actually bro i'm in favour of not translating His names at all

                        i just thought that if you will trnaslate something then the rest of the sentence should be translated

                        Salam

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Users