Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. ?How does one talk with , God.

?How does one talk with , God.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
62 Posts 9 Posters 380 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    savage_carrot
    wrote on last edited by
    #21

    Peace simple,

    It Calculates, Plots and Plans and never makes a mistake.

    A clarification, are you referring to the subconscious? How do you determine it never makes a mistake?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      Fahad1
      wrote on last edited by
      #22

      for what its worth
      According to my understanding of the grammer

      Qalama = To cut or pierce.Q.D
      Aqalama = He cut or pierced.
      Aqlama = They cut or pierced.

      Yalqauna = they meet. Q.D

      So they meet to decide which of them takes care of Mary??

      But this could be wrong aswell.

      Yes, I think it is .

      The verse says "yulqoona/they threw aqlaama-hum/their pens" .

      "aqlaama" here is the plural of "qalam"/pen.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • U Offline
        U Offline
        unknownuser
        wrote on last edited by
        #23

        Peace simple,

        A clarification, are you referring to the subconscious? How do you determine it never makes a mistake?

        I am not saying that , but that is what science or research is saying.

        I thought every body knows this.

        God Bless.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • U Offline
          U Offline
          unknownuser
          wrote on last edited by
          #24

          Yes, I think it is .

          The verse says "yulqoona/they threw aqlaama-hum/their pens" .

          "aqlaama" here is the plural of "qalam"/pen.

          Sorry My Brother but prophets don't rely on the throw of a dice - so it can't be what you have suggested.Prophets relied on Allah's guidance.
          Simerlarly just because this word means a pen aswell it doesn't mean that is the only thing it means in the ayah it is a simple mistranslation of a sort.

          But thanks for your hand.

          God Bless.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • S Offline
            S Offline
            savage_carrot
            wrote on last edited by
            #25

            I am not saying that , but that is what science or research is saying.

            I thought every body knows this.

            God Bless.

            I see. Can you point me to any articles done that determine the subconscious never makes a mistake? I would like to read up on it. I searched and came up with this amongst others so apparently it's not too well known. Maybe you mean the sunconscious remembers everything which is different from making mistakes? Peace.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              Fahad1
              wrote on last edited by
              #26

              Sorry My Brother but prophets don't rely on the throw of a dice

              I didn't say that they do.

              • so it can't be what you have suggested.

              And what did I suggest?

              Prophets relied on Allah's guidance.

              Sure.

              Simerlarly just because this word means a pen aswell it doesn't mean that is the only thing it means in the ayah

              What else does it mean in the Quran? The only other verse that mentions "aqlaam" is 3127.

              it is a simple mistranslation of a sort.

              How?

              But thanks for your hand.

              No problem .

              God Bless.

              Peace.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • A Offline
                A Offline
                AspeRin
                wrote on last edited by
                #27

                peace all handshake
                and (divination by) arrows- an abomination.....nowadays its the socalled lottery
                oracle but more like an object that will answer your question.
                oracle
                1 a a person (as a priestess of ancient Greece) through whom a deity is believed to speak b a shrine in which a deity reveals hidden knowledge or the divine purpose through such a person c an answer or decision given by an oracle
                2 a a person giving wise or authoritative decisions or opinions b an authoritative or wise expression or answer

                the answer comes!believe it!it works and it doesnt have to be an object u can use time,numbers,views,words u hear,everything its connected.keep alert and youll see how allah its everywhere.seek refuge from the evident enemy that makes u forget allah.
                peace handshake

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • U Offline
                  U Offline
                  unknownuser
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #28

                  Salam,
                  I just wanted to add a few things and also pose a question about the following two verses

                  2186Transliteration Wa-itha saalaka AAibadee AAannee fa-innee qareebun ojeebu daAAwata alddaAAi itha daAAani falyastajeeboo lee walyu/minoo bee laAAallahum yarshudoona

                  4060Transliteration Waqala rabbukumu odAAoonee astajib lakum inna allatheena yastakbiroona AAan AAibadatee sayadkhuloona jahannama dakhireena

                  Both of these verses use the root word "du'a" (in bold) which (according to Hans Wehr and Lane) translates as
                  ( &#1608

                  1. to call (someone), to summon (someone), call or send for someone, to assign someone to something (government), to appeal to sonmeone for something
                  2. invite, urge someone, to invite, ask to come
                  3. to challenge, move, induce, prompt (someone to do something)
                  4. to call someone by a name , to be called, be named
                  5. to invoke, wish someone well, bless, invoke a blessing on someone, implore for something for someone
                  6. to curse (to invoke God against someone), call down evil, invoke evil
                  7. to propagate, propagandize, make propeganda, make publicity
                  8. to challenge, pick a qurrel, 9. to proceed judiciously against, prosecute, testify, give evidence in court, bring an accuasation (in court)
                  9. to evoke one another (thoughts reminiscences, sentiments)
                  10. to be associated with each other (thoughts, ideas)
                  11. to be dilapidated, be tumble-down, threaten to fall (walls)
                  12. to sink, fall, cave in
                  13. to fall down, sink to the ground (person)
                  14. to collapse, break down, decline, degenerate (fig. of a cultural phenomenon)
                  15. to flock together rally
                  16. to allege, claim, maintain
                  17. to make undue claims, arrogate, assume unduly or presumptuously
                  18. to affect, feign, simulate, pretend, purport
                  19. blame, hold something against someone
                  20. to call or appoint (someone to a chair for example)

                  These are the many definitions that are given in the two dictionaries. I think that as time went on the words were used in different ways and the language evolved. But I like to get to the root of the root. So my guess would be that a good english definition to sum up the root would be to "call, or summon." The word "invoke" comes to mind too.

                  Which brings us to the subject of Oracles or a means to "call, summon or even invoke" God. If you think about it, don't we use the Quran for guidance and is that so different than using other "oracles" such as casting lots or drawing straws In fact one could say that the Quran is an oracle in the sense that we use it to make decisions, get direction, insight and guidance.

                  So I was looking further at the above verses and I focused on
                  the next key root word that is being used in this verse is "jubb" (in red).
                  Here are the definitions as I found them in Hans Wehr and Lane
                  (plural )

                  1. well, cistern; pit
                  2. to cut something or cut something off.
                  3. extirpating or cutting off of genitals.
                  4. To fecundate palmtrees
                    .
                  5. To surpass, or overcome, a people, or compony of men in grounds of pretension to respect or honour, or
                    in beauty, and in any or every manner.
                  6. a whiteness of the legs
                    rising to the knee and the hock of a horse.
                  7. the act of withdrawing from a thing outwardly or inwardly. The act of shrinking or being averse from something.
                  8. the act of fleeing
                  9. The act of vying, or contending for
                    superiority, in goodliness, or beauty.
                  10. vest or tunic or quilted garmet
                  11. coat of mail or defense.
                  12. Cutting off of the hump of a camel.
                  13. Butter or what is produced by churning camels milk.
                  14. the earth in general

                  and the next word after that in the Lane dictionary is (jubba)
                  which roughly is defined as to restrain, refrain or forebear.

                  Is this the word that is most commonly translated as "answer?"

                  Thoughts on this would be appreciated.
                  Salam

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • U Offline
                    U Offline
                    unknownuser
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #29

                    Salam,
                    One more thing comes to mind on the subject of oracles or drawing straws and casting lots....
                    In the Torah/Old Testament in Numbers chapters 16 and 17 Korah took men and gathered themselves against Moses and Aaron because they sought after the priesthood that Aaron and his sons shared (this is the best of my ability to sum up what happened in Numbers 16))...and in Numbers 17 rods were used to show the people that the priesthood belonged to Aaron and his sons. I have posted the english translation of 171 through 178 below.
                    (KJV translation)
                    171
                    And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying,
                    172
                    Speak unto the children of Israel, and take of every one of them a rod according to the house of their fathers, of all their princes according to the house of their fathers twelve rods write thou every man's name upon his rod.
                    173
                    And thou shalt write Aaron's name upon the rod of Levi for one rod shall be for the head of the house of their fathers.
                    174
                    And thou shalt lay them up in the tabernacle of the congregation before the testimony, where I will meet with you.
                    175
                    And it shall come to pass, that the man's rod, whom I shall choose, shall blossom and I will make to cease from me the murmurings of the children of Israel, whereby they murmur against you.
                    176
                    And Moses spake unto the children of Israel, and every one of their princes gave him a rod apiece, for each prince one, according to their fathers' houses, even twelve rods and the rod of Aaron was among their rods.
                    177
                    And Moses laid up the rods before the LORD in the tabernacle of witness.
                    178
                    And it came to pass, that on the morrow Moses went into the tabernacle of witness; and, behold, the rod of Aaron for the house of Levi was budded, and brought forth buds, and bloomed blossoms, and yielded almonds.

                    Salam

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • S Offline
                      S Offline
                      savage_carrot
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #30

                      Peace Arnab,

                      some thoughts on what you wrote (I'm just going to be touching the things as referenced in the quran as I don't really want to delve in the torah)

                      Which brings us to the subject of Oracles or a means to "call, summon or even invoke" God. If you think about it, don't we use the Quran for guidance and is that so different than using other "oracles" such as casting lots or drawing straws In fact one could say that the Quran is an oracle in the sense that we use it to make decisions, get direction, insight and guidance.

                      There might be some negatives and positives to these methods. For example, we have things like a parrot picking cards at random when a person asks for guidance regarding their problems (not kidding, it really does happen in some places), and whether this method is actually something to be followed in order to receive guidance from God. Or we have casting lots, in which case, it's like a draw and a random person gets picked. This is not to say of course that the particular card/person etc picked eventually was not in God's control but whether it is something that should be practised regularly as a form of consultation or communication with God. These are usually classified as divination methods/auguries, which most civilizations used to practice in some form or the other through the times.

                      The positives can be

                      It is indeed something used to communicate with God that is looked upon favourably and can be practised regularly without any negative impacts.

                      To learn if this is so, we can check what the quran says about these forms of divination and what we know of them while contrasting it to the negatives that might come of them.

                      Negatives

                      random division or a form of such divination is frowned upon in the quran as posted previously. Now could this be that it would carry into other areas of the divination category?

                      Who determines during divination what signs are interpretated as what? Would we have a in-between like the oracles of old who were revered as mystic conduits to let us know what's what? Or maybe there is some guide/book that tells us what a particular throw of the dice/cards holds for our future? In which that would become a go-between to God's guidance?

                      If we do this frequently, would we stop gradually trying to get guidance from other sources and majorly depend on this for our guidance? It seems easy enough to do so, roll a die or pick a card and get an answer, why ponder upon what should be done in a problematic situation? In which case, if it is not what it seems to be, we are kinda stuck with something that is not very trustworthy.

                      In case of random draws/lots. If one doesn't have to pay anything to get in, there seems to be no problem as such. If one is paying for such random draws, then you have a problem that might exacerbate depending on a person's need to get addicted. I know some people who are quite addicted to buying certain bonds just because they might win a prize (far more money than what the bond is worth) in a random draw. I was quite addicted to bingo ashamed. I don't see it a problem in small controllable amounts, it's when the addiction takes over is when it might be a problem really. Secondly, to determine which person gets saddled with some responsibility by drawing lots for it, looks kinda fishy, if done deliberately. Random people getting lucky or unlucky in life is a bit different I guess. Then again, this situation would have some advantages to it, to avoid an altercation, to actually choose a person for a task with minimum hassle as it would be at random and everyone would be have equal chances to get picked, but is this a form of communication with God?

                      In the end I suppose it comes down to individuals. Personally, I would prefer a direct method with the least dependence on multiple sources to get guidance from God. If one compares the quran to other books and say it's the same thing and we can get equal guidance from all, it's a personal choice. I would choose the quran for spiritual guidance or moral quandaries to the exclusion of other books as that's my preference, though for other problems, like the best hair colour for my skin type, I'd probably look to clairol.

                      To add maybe these verses would shed some more light on it

                      4251 No human being can communicate with GOD except through inspiration, or from behind a barrier, or by sending a messenger through whom He reveals what He wills. He is the Most High, Most Wise.

                      4252 Thus, we inspired to you a revelation proclaiming our commandments. You had no idea about the scripture, or faith. Yet, we made this a beacon to guide whomever we choose from among our servants. Surely, you guide in a straight path

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Offline
                        F Offline
                        FJ
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #31

                        Peace all

                        Savage_Carrot you nailed it! It can't be said or thought any better than you just did!!! bravo

                        Peace
                        FJ

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • U Offline
                          U Offline
                          unknownuser
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #32

                          Salaams savage,

                          I see. Can you point me to any articles done that determine the subconscious never makes a mistake? I would like to read up on it. I searched and came up with this amongst others so apparently it's not too well known. Maybe you mean the sunconscious remembers everything which is different from making mistakes? Peace.

                          No i won't give you any links , because instead of looking for the truth of the matter you chose to look for the opposite to what i am saying - i am not the arguing type.

                          But before you put info here of other people you aught to have looked at their credentials-for you have cowboys and professional everywhere.

                          would you go to a witch doctor if your child is sick?
                          I think you wouldn't, but would go to a professional person with authority/ credentials which you can rely on.

                          Thats what you aught to do when giving info of other peoples.

                          Thanks for the nice time however.

                          God Bless.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • S Offline
                            S Offline
                            savage_carrot
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #33

                            No i won't give you any links , because instead of looking for the truth of the matter you chose to look for the opposite to what i am saying - i am not the arguing type.

                            ??? I was asking some questions for clarification of statements put forward by you. I don't think that is taken as arguing anywhere unless one chooses to see it as such to the exclusion of everything else.

                            But before you put info here of other people you aught to have looked at their credentials-for you have cowboys and professional everywhere.

                            would you go to a witch doctor if your child is sick?
                            I think you wouldn't, but would go to a professional person with authority/ credentials which you can rely on.

                            Once again huh? You put forward a statement and said everyone knows this. I was requesting clarification because it apparently is not as well known as you might think it to be, thus the link. Further I tried to ask to clarify what you meant by mistakes, is it that the subconscious remembers everything. That is all. No need for voodoo and witch doctors. If you don't want to post any links I understand.

                            Thats what you aught to do when giving info of other peoples.

                            I see, thanks for the advice. Let me give you some as well, when making statements that involve the use of 'everyone knows', please post links where we can read such.

                            Thanks for the nice time however.

                            You're welcome.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • S Offline
                              S Offline
                              savage_carrot
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #34

                              Peace FJ,

                              Thanks Basically, I usually throw thoughts out to get a better discussion and to refine my own points of views, incase there are some weaknesses in them and so I can change and/or get to a more informed level. This normally isn't done unless one tests it by discussing.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • U Offline
                                U Offline
                                unknownuser
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #35

                                Salaams savage,

                                here you are a little info for you

                                ? Mind Power for the Entrepreneur
                                The subconscious mind is analytical. It creates, computes, plots, plans and NEVER makes a mistake! It is this part of the mind that we use least but rely on most.

                                http//www.hypnosis-nlp-therapy.com/subconscious.html

                                http//www.hypnotherapy-lincolnshire.com/BIG-THE-SUBCONSCIOUS-BIG

                                But look to their credentials.

                                God Bless you.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • S Offline
                                  S Offline
                                  savage_carrot
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #36

                                  Salaams savage,

                                  here you are a little info for you

                                  Mind Power for the Entrepreneur
                                  The subconscious mind is analytical. It creates, computes, plots, plans and NEVER makes a mistake! It is this part of the mind that we use least but rely on most.

                                  http//www.hypnosis-nlp-therapy.com/subconscious.html

                                  http//www.hypnotherapy-lincolnshire.com/BIG-THE-SUBCONSCIOUS-BIG

                                  But look to their credentials.

                                  God Bless you.

                                  Um, that's the same site I posted from (NLP)? confused

                                  Looking to their credentials, one has more 'tags' than the other but both have received the same training but is that they way you would differentiate from whom to accept information from? That one has more degrees than the next? They have opposing viewpoints but excuse me for not thinking if some hypno-therapists know something, it becomes common knowledge (everyone knows) that is scientific and accurate. Would you believe a guy from Harvard more than you would a guy from the university of Chittagong?

                                  Credentials are not really as important as what a person is saying is it? And just because some people have said something it doesn't become accurate or common knowledge. If we all cared for credentials so much, we might as well become sunni's. Peace.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • E Offline
                                    E Offline
                                    Elke
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #37

                                    Salaam nadia

                                    Maybe you mean the sunconscious remembers everything...

                                    Is that a typo ? Or do we have to start a new thread inviting idolfree and magi...

                                    lk

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • S Offline
                                      S Offline
                                      savage_carrot
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #38

                                      Lol, yeah Elke that surely is a typo since b and n on the keyboard are a bit too close for comfort

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • U Offline
                                        U Offline
                                        unknownuser
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #39

                                        Hi savage,

                                        Credentials are not really as important as what a person is saying is it? And just because some people have said something it doesn't become accurate or common knowledge. If we all cared for credentials so much, we might as well become sunni's. Peace

                                        I don?t know about anybody else but a label to me doesn?t mean anything but something like having qualifications recognized do mean a lot.

                                        i.e -
                                        Dip Hyp, Dip Psy, ISCH, MGHSC, NLP Practitioner, RMN, RGN, BA (Hons)

                                        These are known as credentials ? I think so.

                                        God Bless.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • S Offline
                                          S Offline
                                          savage_carrot
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #40

                                          These are known as credentials I think so.

                                          Yes. I also think you didn't understand my post. Thanks.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users