Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. Root Kaf-Waw-Nun in 4:102

Root Kaf-Waw-Nun in 4:102

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
21 Posts 3 Posters 247 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • WakasW Online
    WakasW Online
    Wakas
    wrote on last edited by
    #11

    "Dictionary of Quran" by Abdul Mannan Omar

    http//www.amazon.com/Dictionary-Holy-Quran-Abdul-Mannan/dp/0963206796

    All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • S Offline
      S Offline
      Samia
      wrote on last edited by
      #12

      Does it follow the root system? I ask because some modern dictionaries (like Al-Mawrid) don't, to make it easier for the non-native speakers, or native speakers who do not know the root system, to search for words.

      If it does, I would say it is the only dictionary I heard of that puts the root for Kaana as kaf alif nuun

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • L Offline
        L Offline
        loli
        wrote on last edited by
        #13

        Peace Samia,

        "Dictionary of Quran" by Abdul Mannan Omar follows the root system.

        Peace Wakas,

        Yes, by "them" I should have meant "you (plural)".

        So its "then they (1st group) should be behind you (plural)".

        The question arises, does the plural "you" include the leader?

        hmm.. since the kum is plural i think i have to change my understanding on this verse, Is there any way that i could verify kum is actually plural? whats the root word? i have access to hans wehr/DofQ and Mawrid.

        fal - so/then they
        yakunu - were/will be/would be
        min - from/of
        waraa' - behind
        kum - ye

        salam

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • L Offline
          L Offline
          loli
          wrote on last edited by
          #14

          salam,

          found it on page 496..thanx.

          The question arises, does the plural "you" include the leader?

          Wakas,
          I assume that notice tht there is a "leader" mentioned in the verse because of lahumu

          fa'aqamta - so thou establish
          lahumu - for/to/unto them(plural?/dual?)
          as-salata - the prayer

          so the leader have to pray for/to/unto them? thats is a little bit odd is it? Is there any posibility that the "lahumu in the verse can be translated to "with them"?

          salam

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • WakasW Online
            WakasW Online
            Wakas
            wrote on last edited by
            #15

            peace loli,

            Please note I am not necessarily looking at from a salat=prayer perspective. I just want to understand what the sign says first, then see what meaning fits.

            You are right, it is "slw for/to/unto them", not "with", as far as I'm aware. My question "does the plural "you" include the leader?" was thrown out there to make people consider the possibilities. Some of them may be significant.

            Wakas

            All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • S Offline
              S Offline
              Samia
              wrote on last edited by
              #16

              "does the plural "you" include the leader?"

              Which "you" in the plural?

              The first "you" in the plural in this verse is ...attack you; there is no sin on you if, because of inconvenience of rain or sickness, to put away your arms; but take every precaution for yourselves.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • L Offline
                L Offline
                loli
                wrote on last edited by
                #17

                However in starting of 4102, "you" is singular

                4102;
                Wa-itha - And If
                kunta - you(sing) be/were
                feehim - in them

                Correct me if im wrong;

                Looks like there is a change in the refference for "you" in the end of 4101 and early 4102.

                salam

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • L Offline
                  L Offline
                  loli
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #18

                  peace loli,

                  Please note I am not necessarily looking at from a salat=prayer perspective. I just want to understand what the sign says first, then see what meaning fits.

                  Noted

                  You are right, it is "slw for/to/unto them", not "with", as far as I'm aware. My question "does the plural "you" include the leader?" was thrown out there to make people consider the possibilities. Some of them may be significant.

                  falyakoonoo - so they be
                  min wara-ikum - from behind ye

                  I believe the plural "you" will include the leader, but who are "they"(bolded) in the verse refer to? is it the 1st group or the second group?

                  salam

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • WakasW Online
                    WakasW Online
                    Wakas
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #19

                    peace,

                    Yes, there is a change in "you" in the sign, because it takes into account the leader, 1st group and 2nd group.

                    "they" refers to 1st group.

                    All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • L Offline
                      L Offline
                      loli
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #20

                      "they" refers to 1st group.

                      Peace,

                      falyakoonoo - so they(1st group) be
                      min wara-ikum - from behind ye(1st group+leader),

                      I think this interpretation doesnt fit well in the verse doesnt it? How can a group be behind the same group?unless we are talking with reference of position.

                      salam.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • WakasW Online
                        WakasW Online
                        Wakas
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #21

                        peace all,

                        Some diagrams of the starting positions (however it makes sense that the end positions would mirror the start positions, the only difference being the switch in groups)

                        http//img82.imageshack.us/img82/6018/slwaoy6.jpg
                        Clearly, diagram A supports a non-prayer, more like an oration.

                        http//img121.imageshack.us/img121/728/slwbzm5.jpg
                        Lets say diagram B represents an act such as prayer, can anyone see any flaws in terms of defence?

                        Any other comments?

                        All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Users