"MUTTA"(Temporary marriage)

TAJ

Peace,

A Shia resource

http//www.al-islam.org/m_morals/index.htm

SarahY

I don't see how it is leading to muta?

Haroon

the Quran does not promote Mutah.

It simply doesn't

siki

For sure this verse is not talking of Nikah, as no such Arabic word is used, instead "istumtutum" is used here.
siki

Haroon

what are your proposing this verse talks about?

mutah is not a concept supported by the Quran.

Do you believe in mutah?

siki

Do you believe in mutah?

i never did,,, but it seems as if it is supported by the BOOK;
has this topic ever been debated/thrashed in this forum?
siki

Haroon

it's been discussed and i'm sure it's clear from both the book and from articles on this website discussing what the Quran has to say about marriage, relationships and sex that mu'tah is not allowed.

Al-Quraishi

the Quran does not promote Mutah.

It simply doesn't

Ameen

SwedenMajidah

Salam,

Lol don't say " Ameen" it's not a muslim way rather a christian way.

Majidah

SwedenMajidah

Salam,

Here is more on Mutah, discussed before in the forum.

http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=8156.0

Peace
Majidah

unknownuser

Peace bro Sikandar,

I think you are having a misunderstanding of 424 and I will try to clear it.

According to al-qur'aan, the steps in marriage seem to be as follows

Nakah - marriage in front of witnesses
Setting of dowry - done at nakah or later but before consummation (see 2236-237)
Consummation of marriage
Payment of dowry

424 talks about the payment of dowry after the consummation of marriage (steps 3 and 4). The "istamta3tum" is the consummation of marriage. This is made clear by the next verse 425 which begins

425 "And whoever of you cannot afford to marry (yanki7a) the "muhsanat" believers............,

which makes it clear that the "istamta3tum" is after "nakah". The "muhsanat" believers in 425 refers to the "ma malakat aymanukum" out of "al-muhsanatu min al-nnisa" mentioned in 424, i.e. those women self protected by oath of engagement.

Thus 424 implies regular marriage/"nakah", and there is no indication whatsoever of temporary marriage.

Hope that helps.

siki

samia, maxq, muqran, nadia, warner, yasin ,ayman, or any body , you are welcome to join in, or interested in following this , please come to polygamy thread,

http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=13534.30
siki

Al-Quraishi

Salam,

Lol don't say " Ameen" it's not a muslim way rather a christian way.

Majidah

Salam,

Hmmm, I know its origins, I use it as an easy way to confer acceptance with other posters.

However I was thinking over this issue of whether I should continue to use it as a matter of fact, perhaps I'll say 'Agreed' instead next time! lol

SwedenMajidah

salam,

AGREED is a much better word .

Maria

palestina

I was going to start a new thread - but just thought id revive this once which didnt really get going so much.....

Where did the idea of mutta/miysar/urfi marriage come from?? I dont see anything in the quran that can lead me to believe they are allowed?

Are these different terms for the same thing or do they differ?

I was reading this book online - heard about it from a link on an old thread on the board
http//www.alousra.com/LeapEng_5.htm
its by sunnis and shias working towards advocating ways for young people to get to know each other - their ideas on this temporary contract are interesting and strange (to me - since i know very little about this topic to start with)
However they do rely heavily on hadiths!

Mazhar

For the benefit of Urdu speaking/understanding friends;

http//haqeeqat.org.pk/paker/04/slides/1.html