Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. General Issues / Questions
  4. Who built the kaaba that is in Mecca?

Who built the kaaba that is in Mecca?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Issues / Questions
486 Posts 34 Posters 25.8k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    Raj-ah
    wrote on last edited by
    #231

    If you are implying the hadith hold any credibility empirically, oh lord, you should just keel over...

    Look at how they were collected, referenced, classed. Any history is better than such rubbish.

    Just don't dive in with your nose facing the ground, may be later we will have to hear a sound of OPFFFFFFFF...

    Please try to understand what is being said or leave it to more credible posters, like Tanveer or AgentXXX who are having discussion or who started the thread.

    Hadith has become such a terror for some of guys/girls over here that whenever they donot understand what is going on they come up with HADITH HADITH HADITH, even if there is no mention of any.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • U Offline
      U Offline
      unknownuser
      wrote on last edited by
      #232

      But by your reckoning OPF, if a text contains wisdom it is a proof of god,some hadiths contain wisdom,no? Why the double standard in regard to sunnis?
      ps; why do guys have a phobia against sunni hadith,and then use their own 'selected' history/hadiths to justify their beliefs instead?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • U Offline
        U Offline
        unknownuser
        wrote on last edited by
        #233

        Just don't dive in with your nose facing the ground, may be later we will have to hear a sound of OPFFFFFFFF...

        Please try to understand what is being said or leave it to more credible posters, like Tanveer or AgentXXX who are having discussion or who started the thread.

        Hadith has become such a terror for some of guys/girls over here that whenever they donot understand what is going on they come up with HADITH HADITH HADITH, even if there is no mention of any.

        I'm sorry, what other sources are there? Maybe I'm in the wrong, but most evidence pointing to Muhammad being in Makkah and circumabulating 7 times around a black cube with pagan symbols comes from the Hadith, no?

        "Hadith has become such a terror for some of guys/girls over here that whenever they donot understand what is going on they come up with HADITH HADITH HADITH, even if there is no mention of any."

        Oh, I am so deeply sorry that I take the corruption of a blessed religion by paganistic bastards who had s***ty sex lives, and large mouths quite seriously. Might thou forgivest me, I shall surely seek your(PBUH) intercession on the day of Judgement.

        @Enquirer

        No, that does not hold. Wisdom is from God, but it is not intrinsically proof of God. See my reply in the other thread. Well done on the trap fallacy, by the way.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • S Offline
          S Offline
          stillearning
          wrote on last edited by
          #234

          AOA Samia

          So don't put words in my message and invent an opporunity to attack me in order to feel good about yourself.

          What ever failings I have in life, believe me I have plenty to occupy me, outside this forum, and make me feel good than trying to get better of someone who appears to spend most of her time staring at a monitor.
          I have no hesitation in admitting my own failings, which you and your fellow sectists appear to have problem with even when you contradict yourselves from one page to next.

          Let us deal with your post & Al-Fath in a little bit more detail

          Quote
          Whilst they accept that the word used for in, interior, midst etc is not the one always used when mentioning cities. However, it is perfectly legitimate to use it in the way it has been translated in English to date.

          So, they agree that it can't be used for cities. That's what I said. What makes it legitimate in their eyes is the preconception of the meaning, not because it is correct.

          So how did you arrive to the conclusion that either my Arabic is poor or I am deliberately trying to misinform?

          The above demonstrates how you misinterpret to prove your baseless theories. I was being perfectly honest with you.
          The word Bibtan (or whichever way you want to say it) IS NOT ALWAYS USED, BUT CAN BE ON OCCASSIONS. In English this simply means that it is not used every time. Just as in English one can use, in, inside, midst, heart, interior?.to mean inside a city or town the same applies to Arabic. IT DOES NOT MEAN THAT IT CAN?T BE USED FOR CITIES. I suggest you read my sentence again before reaching your triumphant conclusion. If you are not sure ask some one who may have better grasp of English than yourself.

          What makes it legitmate in their eyes is the preconception of the meaning, not because it is correct.

          Now again your ego is making assumptions. There was no preconception here. My discussion involved every concept of the meaning of the word with no preconceived prejudices (I would have been quite happy to accept your version if it was the correct interpretation-for my main objective is to get to the truth).
          Let me make this absolutely clear so that we don?t go around in circles. There is no doubt that the word can be used to mean inside, interior, midst etc of a City or town.
          I have also learned that the word is more appropriately used to mean inside a city than inside/interior of destruction.

          biba6n is more logical to mean confront/confrontation than interior.

          Ok! So that is what you have said

          & this

          What does (in the interior of Mecca) mean anyway? If this is bad English, it is also bad Arabic. Why not just (in Mecca)?

          & I presume you agree with this,

          "
          biba6ni makkat" clearly means IN THE MIDST OF DESTRUCTION/WEARING DOWN

          1. And it is He who has restrained their hands from you and your hands from them in the midst of destruction/wearing down after that He gave you the victory over them. And The God sees all that you do.

          Let us substitute what your meaning is in what your fellow sectist has written.

          1. And it is He who has restrained their hands from you and your hands from them in the confront/confrontation destruction/wearing down after that He gave you the victory over them. And The God sees all that you do.

          I don?t know! Perhaps it makes more sense in Arabic?

          All other usages directly mean (stomach, uterus) which are the organs in the frontal.

          I am afraid you have lost me here, what do you mean organs of the frontal?

          From the history (which the new sect does not believe in ? unless it suits their point), Mohd Left Makka and eventually returned to Makka without a stone, arrow or any kung fu kicks being thrown in anger.

          The following is the new sects very own translation (by the way word Makka is still there)

          In the name of God, the Almighty, the Merciful.
          481
          We have given you a clear conquest.
          482
          So that God may forgive your present sins, as well as those past, and so that He may complete His blessings upon you, and guide you on a straight path.
          483
          And God will grant you a conquest which is mighty.
          484
          He is the One who sends down tranquility into the hearts of the believers, so that they may increase in faith along with their present faith. And to God belongs the soldiers of the heavens and the Earth, and God is Knowledgeable, Wise.
          485
          That He may admit the believing men and believing women into estates with rivers flowing beneath them, abiding eternally therein, and He will remit their sins from them. And with God this is a great triumph.
          486
          And He will punish the hypocrite men and the hypocrite women, and the idolater men and the idolater women, who think evil thoughts about God. Their evil will come back to them, and God was angry with them, and He has cursed them and prepared for them Hell. What a miserable destiny!
          487
          And to God belongs the soldiers of the heavens and the Earth. And God is Noble, Wise.
          488
          We have sent you as a witness, a bearer of good news, and a warner.
          489
          So that you may believe in God and His messenger, and that you may support Him, honor Him, and glorify Him, morning and evening.
          4810
          Those who pledge allegiance to you, are in-fact pledging allegiance to God; God's hand is above their hands. Those of them who violate such a pledge, are violating it only upon themselves. And whosoever fulfills what he has pledged to God, then He will grant him a great reward.
          4811
          The Nomads who lagged behind will say to you "We were preoccupied with our money and our family, so ask forgiveness for us." They say with their tongues what is not in their hearts. Say "Who then would possess any power for you against God if He wanted harm to afflict you or if He wanted benefit for you?" No, God is fully Aware of everything you do.
          4812
          Alas, you thought that the messenger and the believers would not return to their families, and this was deemed pleasant in your hearts, and you thought the worst thoughts; you were a wicked people.

          SO WHAT IS GOD REFERING TO HERE. WHERE DID THE BELIEVERS FAMILIES LIVE. WHAT DOES THE HISTORY TELL US

          4813
          Anyone who does not believe in God and His messenger, then We have prepared for the rejecters a Hellfire.
          4814
          And to God is the sovereignty of the heavens and the Earth. He forgives whomever He wills, and punishes whomever He wills. God is Forgiver, Merciful.
          4815
          Those who lagged behind will say, when you venture out to collect the spoils "Let us follow you!" They want to change God's words. Say "You will not follow us; this is what God has decreed beforehand." They will then say "No, you are envious of us." Alas, they rarely understood anything.
          4816
          Say to those Nomads who lagged behind "You will be called on to fight a people who are very powerful in warfare, unless they surrender. Then if you obey, God will grant you a good reward, but if you turn away as you turned away before, He will punish you with a painful retribution."
          4817
          There is no burden on the blind, nor is there any burden on the cripple, nor is there on the sick any burden. And whosoever obeys God and His messenger, He will admit them into paradises with rivers flowing beneath; and whosoever turns away, He will punish him with a painful retribution.
          4818
          God is pleased with the believers who pledged allegiance to you under the tree. He thus knew what was in their hearts, so He sent down tranquility upon them, and rewarded them with a near victory.
          4819
          And abundant spoils that they will take. God is Noble, Wise.
          4820
          God has promised you abundant spoils that you will take. Thus He has hastened this for you, and He has withheld the people's hands against you; that it may be a sign for the believers, and that He may guide you to a straight path.

          WHOSE HAND IS GOD WITHOLDING HERE.4821
          And the other group which you could not vanquish, God took care of them. And God was capable of all things.

          WHICH GROUP DID GOD TAKE CARE OF HERE4822
          And if the rejecters had fought you, they would have turned and ran, then they would have found neither an ally nor a victor.
          4823
          Such is God's way with those who have passed away before, and you will not find any change in God's way.
          4824
          And He is the One who withheld their hands against you, and your hands against them in the interior of Mecca, after He had made you victorious over them. God is Seer of what you do.

          DOES THE HISTORY NOT TELL US THAT MOHD ENTERED MAKKA WITHOUT A FIGHT

          4825
          They are the ones who rejected and barred you from the Restricted Temple, and barred your donations from reaching their destination. And there had been believing men and women whom you did not know, and you may have hurt them, and on whose account you would have committed a sin unknowingly. God will admit into His mercy whomever He wills. Had they become separated, We would then have punished those of them who rejected with a painful retribution.

          If all this occurred in a town other than Makka. When the Pagans overthrow Islam, destroyed every evidence, killed every child, woman and man who believed in the true Islam. Rewrote every bit of history that we have today. What about the town/city where the believers families were. Did the inhabitants of this place not object to losing their privileged status or were they massacred as well?

          Quote from Ra-jah

          If it is not in Quran then you are relying on history or am I wrong?
          If on history then what makes your history more reliable then main stream? Give us proofs for it!

          According to the newest sect, history does not exist unless it agrees with their view point.
          Apologies if I don?t clap and cheer, I assume you are here to discuss and learn and not have your ego massaged.

          regards

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • A Offline
            A Offline
            AaRoN
            wrote on last edited by
            #235

            stillearning - you admit that it can be used to mean "midst" yet when it comes to relating it to destruction you keep referring to "interior of destruction" as a method of discrediting it as nonsensical

            what's wrong with "amidst destruction"?

            can nobody even point someone to a door and have them open it themselves anymore? we have to walk people up to the door, open it for them, shove them through and slam it behind them? come on

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • S Offline
              S Offline
              Samia
              wrote on last edited by
              #236

              Stillearning

              This very long message, full of bashing, roaring, anger, name calling...etc..etc..just to show that I am wrong? I think it is backfiring, and is not proving anything except a poor way of discussing and analysing.

              A better way is to pick up an Arabic-English dictionary ( I mentioned this before and even made some suggestions), look up the entry "b6n". If you find an example for its usage as "in town", I will own up to my error. Until then, I am not wasting my time with you.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • A Offline
                A Offline
                agentxxx
                wrote on last edited by
                #237

                peace Rajah,

                Agent xxx
                Quote
                Because I don?t agree with your understanding doesn?t mean that I haven?t read the whole Sura. if we all understand/interpret Quran/surah/verses in a similar manner, there wouldn't be any disagreements.

                Rajah- Well we are discussing. The whole Surah is about Musa and His people which Allah has told to Muhammad so he can warn the Meccans who have been never warned by any prophet by telling them the story of Moses.

                My dear, dear dear, rajah?..yes the whole surah is about the story of Moses??..but it is to convince the people that such knowledge of the past events is not possible without divine guidance/inspiration. and has nothing to do with "being the first warner"

                The verses 322 and 366 also support ?what is said in 2846? but without mentioning the story of Moses.

                Please ponder on all these verses.

                AL-QASAS (THE STORY, STORIES)
                2846. And you were not on this side of the mountain when We called, but a mercy from your Lord that YOU MAY WARN A PEOPLE TO WHOM NO WARNER CAME BEFORE YOU, that they may be mindful.

                1. And were it not that there should befall them a disaster for what their hands have sent before, THEN THEY SHOULD SAY Our Lord! WHY DIDST THOU NOT SEND TO US A MESSENGER SO THAT WE SHOULD HAVE FOLLOWED THY COMMUNICATIONS and been of the believers !

                2. 46
                  C3379. This people was the Quraish. 'Though thou didst not see how Moses was invested with the prophetic office at Mount Tur, thou hast had similar experience thyself, and We have sent thee to the Quraish TO WARN THEM OF ALL THEIR SINS, and to repent and come into the Faith'.

                3. 47
                  C3380. Now that a warner has come among them WITH ALL THE AUTHORITY THAT PREVIOUS MESSENGERS POSSESSED and WITH ALL THE KNOWLEDGE WHICH CAN ONLY COME BY DIVINE INSPIRATION, they have no excuse left whatever. They cannot say, "No warner came to us." If any evil comes to them, as the inevitable result of their iii-deeds, they cannot blame Allah and say that they were not warned. Cf. xx. 134.

                AS-SAJDA (THE PROSTRATION,WORSHIP, ADORATION)
                Alif Lam Mim. 32 1.
                The revelation of the Book, there is no doubt in it, is from the Lord of the worlds. 32 2.
                Or do they say He has forged it? Nay! it is the truth from your Lord THAT YOU MAY WARN A PEOPLE TO WHOM NO WARNER HAS COME BEFORE YOU, that THEY MAY FOLLOW THE RIGHT DIRECTION. 32 3.

                YA-SEEN (YA-SEEN)
                Ya Seen. 36 1.
                I swear by the Quran full of wisdom 36 2.
                Most surely you are one of the messengers 36 3.
                On a right way. 36 4
                A revelation of the Mighty, the Merciful. 36 5.
                THAT YOU MAY WARN A PEOPLE WHOSE FATHERS WERE NOT WARNED, so they are heedless. 36 6.

                C3946. The Quraish had received no Prophet before, and therefore one of themselves was made the vehicle for the universal Message to the whole world.

                Now according to my understanding?.it is clear that the people to whom Mohammed is addressing did not receive any Warner/messenger before him?.neither did their forefathers received any warning before Mohammad.

                Quote
                For pilgrimage? none of his close family member/decedents i.e. LUT, ISHAQ, YAQOOB, YOUSAF came to Mecca for pilgrimage?

                Rajah-If it is not in Quran then you are relying on history or am I wrong?
                If on history then what makes your history more reliable then main stream? Give us proofs for it!

                The above mentioned verses are my proofs.

                peace

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • A Offline
                  A Offline
                  agentxxx
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #238

                  peace Rajah,

                  Rajah- Abraham was buried by Isaac and Ismail, how does this proves that Isamail cannot be living far away from Hebron??

                  When Abraham died, his sons Isaac and Ishmael buried him together in the cave of Machpelah that he bought from Ephron the son Zohar the Hittite (Gen 258-9).

                  This grave is acknowledged by Muslims to be under the Mosque of Abraham in Hebron. since Ishmail was not living with Ibrahim when Ibrahim died, so Ishaq had to send a messenger to Ishmail (in Paran) to inform him.

                  If Ishmael was living in Mecca How many days it would have taken for a messenger from Hebron to Mecca and for Ishmael to make it to Hebron? The body of Abraham will be rotting very badly by then.

                  Unless Ishaq had a cell phone to inform Ismail about the death of their father and Ismail had a chopper service or a land cruiser ready to take him to Hebron?.I don?t think he would have made it to Hebron from Mecca in time to attend his father?s funeral either on foot or on a horse.
                  So it is more probable that Paran was just at the southern boundary of Canaan, from where Ishmail could make it within a day or two?

                  Rajah- 2121 And he dwelt in the wilderness of Paran and his mother took him a wife out of the land of Egypt.

                  "Paran = 'two who migrated'"

                  Where is Paran located??

                  And wilderness = wastelands; forest; desert; range; back country; uninhabited region; garden for wild growth; wild or disordered state, jumble, confusing multitude

                  Should have been somewhere near Hebron?

                  http//i73.photobucket.com/albums/i231/nabpeace/wildernessofparan-1.jpg

                  The biblical wilderness of Paran is partly in the Sinai Peninsula, including the city of Kadesh (Num. 1326) at its northern end. Kadesh Barnea is an identifiable place seen on most maps. Joshua 153 tells us that it is part of the border of the tribe of Judah. In particular, Paran was a wilderness territory, not a city, bordering to the south of Judah (1 Sam 251-5), which itself is the southern-most tribe of Israel.

                  Mecca is far removed from Judah and Kadesh-Barnea.

                  Why would Ibrahim banish his son so far away from him?

                  Rajah- Mount Paran is the chain of mountains in that same region which the Arabs call the "Sarawat Mountains". Muhammad (pbuh) received his first revelation in the cave of "Hira'a" located in these mountains.

                  Mount paran is the chain of mountains in kharian, Punjab. Which the local Punjabi call Pubbian ;D

                  The Arabs can call it what ever they like?.it serves their purpose .

                  There are people who say ?Murree? the hill station near Islamabad is named after Mary ?mother of Jesus? and she is buried there?.there is a Kadam gah of Ali in haiderabad, sind??.there is a foot print of Mohammed in ?Pakpattan??.there is a place kohkaf near ?Chitral? where they say the fairies live?am I to believe all this without any solid evidence?

                  rajah- Even in those times people travelled a lot.
                  We know that ancient people (and even modern people) people move pretty often.

                  Abraham's father, Terah moved his family from Ur to Haran (Genesis 1131). Abraham and Lot moved from Haran to Canaan (Genesis 124-5). Due to famine, he moved to Egypt (Genesis 1210). In history, once a group of people gets too large, they moved. We see this happening between Abraham and Lot (Genesis 136-1 (See this map for Abraham's journeys). They also moved because of the environment. Famine caused Abraham to go to Egypt (Genesis 1210), Isaac to go to the Philistines (Genesis 261) and Jacob's family to go to Egypt (Genesis 43). People also moved because of political reasons as people gets displaced. Aren't the Arabs originally nomadic tribes, who excelled in caravan trade?

                  So it rather confirms that Ismail lived and settled in Paran "Makkah" and he and his Dad Abraham built the KAABA THAT IS IN MECCA!

                  Not According to 2846, 323, and 366 ?.. no Warner/messenger were sent to the Meccans and their fore fathers before Mohammad.

                  http//i73.photobucket.com/albums/i231/nabpeace/ibrahimjourney.jpg
                  Map of Ibrahim's journey.

                  People did migrate?but that migration didn?t happened in hours or day?.it took them months and years and some times generations to move from one place to the other depending upon the distances.

                  Ibrahim was 89 years old when Ismail was born and 99 when Ishaq was born, Ismael and hagar were banished few years after the birth of Ishaq.

                  Now please tell me ?did Ibrahim and ismail come to Mecca for the construction of kaaba before the birth of Ishaq? Or after he has banished hagar and ismail? ?..and why Mecca?

                  Mecca - Situated in the rocky foothills of the Hijaz Mountains, Mecca has a hot, arid climate, and lack of water and other resources have kept its population and economic fortunes heavily dependent on outside factors.

                  Medina - It is situated in a well-watered oasis where fruit, dates, vegetables, and grain are raised.

                  http//i73.photobucket.com/albums/i231/nabpeace/arabia.jpg
                  Mecca is 1232 Km from Jerusalem.

                  People usually migrate and settle at places which are better then the place of their origin?coming from the north toward Mecca they had to pass by Medina an oasis in the desert and 400 km shorter in distance then Mecca ?.what was so special about Mecca that made them travel so far?

                  Even when hagar and Ismail were banished and if they traveled toward the south, Medina would have been the ideal place for them to dwell.

                  rajah- This further confirms that the House of Allah existed even before Muhammad and Jesus in the Arab and all the historical evidences lead us to "Paran" MAKKAH" "BAKKAH" located in present day Saudi.

                  Wonder why? Jesus, Zikria or Yahya were least interested in this house of Allah

                  peace

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • N Offline
                    N Offline
                    noble
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #239

                    Peace
                    To those who say that claims on this web-site mean that the Arabs re-wrote their history do not get it.
                    The Arabs never wrote any of their history until well after the Prophets death, and then these were based on collections of chains of narrations going back to the Prophet or his Companions well after 200 years...
                    Up to those latter years, nothing was collected, (or if you want to believe in some hadiths, it was ordered by the Prophet and his Companions that all accounts on his life be destroyed), and no effort was made to make a cohesive story about what happened in the region...
                    Overall I do not have many problems with Hadith, I just do not accept them as a source of law, divine guidance, or even accurate historical accounts, The Quran is far from enough from me, and if I would follow most it says, I will be very pious indeed...
                    For the question who built the Kaabah, the obvious answer is The Saudis, and that's the end of it.
                    Is it Maqam Ibrahim, I have no idea...
                    By the way, sorry if I offended your fragile ego Rajah, I have to tell you though, Ahmed Bhaggat taught you well, you follow his rules of engagement to the tee )

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • U Offline
                      U Offline
                      unknownuser
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #240

                      Unless Ishaq had a cell phone to inform Ismail about the death of their father and Ismail had a chopper service or a land cruiser ready to take him to Hebron.I dont think he would have made it to Hebron from Mecca in time to attend his fathers funeral either on foot or on a horse.
                      So it is more probable that Paran was just at the southern boundary of Canaan, from where Ishmail could make it within a day or two?

                      Correction Ever heard of Buraq? We shouldn't be sceptical if possible explanations are there. Alhamdulillah

                      Ibrahim was 89 years old when Ismail was born and 99 when Ishaq was born, Ismael and hagar were banished few years after the birth of Ishaq.

                      Now please tell me did Ibrahim and ismail come to Mecca for the construction of kaaba before the birth of Ishaq? Or after he has banished hagar and ismail? ..and why Mecca?

                      Correction again A prophet has more power than a normal human being SubhanAllah doubts should be clear now.....Please know about Buraq that is very swift. Alhamdulillah

                      People usually migrate and settle at places which are better then the place of their origincoming from the north toward Mecca they had to pass by Medina an oasis in the desert and 400 km shorter in distance then Mecca .what was so special about Mecca that made them travel so far?

                      Even when hagar and Ismail were banished and if they traveled toward the south, Medina would have been the ideal place for them to dwell.

                      I dont know from where you people read history....okey let me tell.........kaaba was first built by Baba Adam Saheb......now Allah told Ibrahim to rebuilt it. SA is also an oil rich country..that is another sepecial thing about mecca. Like I said before bros we shouldn't be sceptical when all the satisfying answers are there. Alhamdulillah. May god accept our humble efforts. Amin

                      Ah, sorry I have to come again to clear one more doubt

                      Wonder why? Jesus, Zikria or Yahya were least interested in this house of Allah Wink

                      This is another misconception that they never visited. We should only say Allah never told us if they visited! But alhamdulillah as a Muslim we all believe that they all definitely visited it for sure with great passion. MashaAllah.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • A Offline
                        A Offline
                        agentxxx
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #241

                        Correction Ever heard of Buraq? We shouldn't be sceptical if possible explanations are there. Alhamdulillah

                        Correction again A prophet has more power than a normal human being SubhanAllah doubts should be clear now.....Please know about Buraq that is very swift. Alhamdulillah

                        I wonder where this "burraq" was at the time of Mohammed's hijrat to Medina confused

                        peace

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • U Offline
                          U Offline
                          unknownuser
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #242

                          Correction Ever heard of Buraq? We shouldn't be sceptical if possible explanations are there. Alhamdulillah

                          Correction again A prophet has more power than a normal human being SubhanAllah doubts should be clear now.....Please know about Buraq that is very swift. Alhamdulillah

                          For the past 1400 years of observation, nobody has noted any horses racing like a nutter. While it is very possible that Ishmael had a car (how else would you explain knowledge of the big bang and all that jazz?), it is unlikely as history shows.

                          Why is it that you see a rational explanation - Ismail and Ishaq were localised and that is how they got into contact - and substitute it for a flying unicorn?!?! Am I missing something?

                          "Correction again A prophet has more power than a normal human being"

                          Cite a Quranic verse? I recall reading many stating that the prohets were "men like yourselves"... Maybe you have a specific verse...

                          Of course, that does not mean what you said is irrational - we're talking prophets here. Just less possible.

                          AgentXXX, let me introduce to you a concept that will most likely invalidate the interpretation of the Quranic verses you cited - time. As time tends towards increasing, people tend towards changing. Now, over a significantly long period, i.e. 630 years, would you say the same people inhabited Makkah as they did before? In other words, when God says "people to whom no warner came before", it could simply mean that so many generations passed, that all knowledge of the previous warners died completely.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • U Offline
                            U Offline
                            unknownuser
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #243

                            "Correction again A prophet has more power than a normal human being"

                            Cite a Quranic verse? I recall reading many stating that the prohets were "men like yourselves"... Maybe you have a specific verse...

                            You are just jealous, Alhamdulillah Bukhari and Muslim told us that prophets have more power.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • U Offline
                              U Offline
                              unknownuser
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #244

                              You are just jealous, Alhamdulillah Bukhari and Muslim told us that prophets have more power.

                              Bukhari (PBUH)? Oh, OK, I see. Thanks for the overwhelming evidence.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • U Offline
                                U Offline
                                unknownuser
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #245

                                AgentXXX, let me introduce to you a concept that will most likely invalidate the interpretation of the Quranic verses you cited - time. As time tends towards increasing, people tend towards changing. Now, over a significantly long period, i.e. 630 years, would you say the same people inhabited Makkah as they did before? In other words, when God says "people to whom no warner came before", it could simply mean that so many generations passed, that all knowledge of the previous warners died completely.

                                Then prophet mohammed is also not descendant of Ibrahim!

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • U Offline
                                  U Offline
                                  unknownuser
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #246

                                  I wonder where this "burraq" was at the time of Mohammed's hijrat to Medina confused

                                  peace

                                  Ever heard of workshop?

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • U Offline
                                    U Offline
                                    unknownuser
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #247

                                    Then prophet mohammed is also not descendant of Ibrahim!

                                    I didn't mean that...

                                    I meant that supposing a warner came to those in Makkah, or Jerusalem, or Mars, over 600 years, the knowledge of such a warner could possibly be lost, hence the Quranic verses cited could not be used to prove/disprove anything in this specific reference frame.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • U Offline
                                      U Offline
                                      unknownuser
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #248

                                      I didn't mean that...

                                      I meant that supposing a warner came to those in Makkah, or Jerusalem, or Mars, over 600 years, the knowledge of such a warner could possibly be lost, hence the Quranic verses cited could not be used to prove/disprove anything in this specific reference frame.

                                      The knowledge in the memories of people could lost but Allah never forgets. Why did god says no warner has come to their forefathers 366 ? Did god forget? Astaghfirullahi 3theem.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • U Offline
                                        U Offline
                                        unknownuser
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #249

                                        The knowledge in the memories of people could lost but Allah never forgets. Why did god says no warner has come to their forefathers 366 ? Did god forget? Astaghfirullahi 3theem.

                                        God does not forget, I forget though. The word "fathers" was pretty bloody invisible to me! Sorry, my bad.

                                        But if you are to use this verse in such a way, it would imply that Muhammad was based in Makkah, but Jerusalem was the "bayt-al-haram"?

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • U Offline
                                          U Offline
                                          unknownuser
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #250

                                          God does not forget, I forget though. The word "fathers" was pretty bloody invisible to me! Sorry, my bad.

                                          np, its good you realised it.

                                          But if you are to use this verse in such a way, it would imply that Muhammad was based in Makkah, but Jerusalem was the "bayt-al-haram"?

                                          We can investigate this further.......but we are sure now that no warner ever came to them before....

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users