Who are the people of the book?
-
Salam, Arnab,
So, Is what I am quoting underneath revealed? If it is revealed, who revealed it to whom?
Genesis 6 (King James Version)
King James Version (KJV)
Public Domain"Genesis 6
1And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them,
2That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose.
3And the LORD said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years.
4There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.
5And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.
6And it repented the LORD that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart."
Salaam
This is from the Torah...the Five books of Moses.
Salam,
Arnab -
Peace "arnab",
JK- OH REALLY? Show me that arch evidence for that.Did you forget to read THIS from the SAME PAGE as the link you provided (which I was already familiar with by the way)
The oldest known preserved fragment of a Torah text is a good luck charm inscribed with a text close to, although not identical with, the Priestly Blessing found in Num 624?27, dated to approximately 600 BC (Dever, p. 180). The oldest complete or nearly complete texts are the Dead Sea Scrolls from the middle of the 2nd century BC to the 1st century AD. The DSS contain almost all the books of the Tanakh, although not all are complete.
source http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dating_the_Bible#Oldest_manuscripts
The Masoretic Text, written in Hebrew, became the standard authorized Hebrew text around 100 AD. It existed prior to the writings of the New Testament, confirmed by the Dead Sea Scrolls as early as 168 B.C., and was used as the official Hebrew Old Testament at the time the biblical canon was established.
source http//www.allabouttruth.org/oldest-bible-version-faq.htmBRITISH MUSEUM MAKES IMPORTANT BREAKTHROUGH IN BIBLICAL ARCHAEOLOGY
Rare cuniform tablet
source http//www.24hourmuseum.org.uk/ixbin/hix?IXFIRST=4&IXSS=IXFIRST%3d1%26_IXmode%3dgfx_en%26%2524%2528news%2bor%2bexhibition%2529%2bin%2bart_section%2bindex%2btext_wp2%3d%252e%26_IXSESSION_%3drEQJ_SMJtWB%26%257bSIMPLE%257d%257band%257d%2524%253f%253a%2524%3dbritish%2bmuseum%2bbiblical%26%2524sort%2b%2540descending%2bart_publish_date%3d%252e&_IXmode=gfx_en&IXMAXHITS=1&IXSR=aVL74SBjZQw&IXSPFX=search/full_gfx/&IXSESSION=rEQJ_SMJtWB&submit-button=summaryIsaiah scroll, written by a Judean scribe around 120 B.C.,
http//www.newsvine.com/_news/2008/05/13/1485989-israel-museum-puts-dead-sea-scroll-on-rare-displayIn 1947, seven ancient scrolls were found in pottery urns in caves in the Judean Desert. The scrolls reached antiquities dealers in Bethlehem, and after many vicissitudes they were gathered in Jerusalem and exhibited at the Shrine of the Book in the Israel Museum. One of the first scrolls to be discovered was a full copy of the Book of Isaiah, which provides important evidence for the text of the Bible that was common in Eretz-Israel at the end of the Second Temple period. In time, more and more fragments of scrolls were discovered, some in caves at Nahal Qumran, some at Masada, and some in other places of the Judean Desert. Scholars believe that the most ancient of these scrolls were written around 250 BCE, whereas the latest ones were written in the early second century CE (after the destruction of the Second Temple and the repression of the Bar-Kokhba Rebellion).
source http//aleppocodex.org/links/7.htmlThe Dead Sea Scrolls date from 250 BCE to 68 CE and are our bridge to a period that laid the foundation of western traditions, beliefs and practices throughout the past two millennia.
source http//www.naturalsciences.org/wnew/2008-02-19_deadseascrolls.htmlThere is your Archeological evidence. They PRE DATE both Muhammad and Isa.
jonny_k I'm surprised you even believe in the Quran. Have you read all the people who claim that it is not authentic and that it has been tampered with etc etc? I could post pages of links where people claim they can prove the Quran is a fraud.
The fact is you are either min al muminoon or min al kafiroon.
Why don't you go read about that for a while.
Salam,
Arnab -
Peace "arnab",
JK- You yourself indirectly agreed that GOD did allow/suggest/command the death penlaty for apostates/blasphemers once. This is enough to know that it cannot be the true Word of GOD. If such were to be the commands/suggestions/laws of GOD then the hadith can also be the inspirations of GOD. The CONTENT plays a VITAL ROLE in deciding whether some scripture is the Word of GOD or not as well. A Book of GOD cannot contain statements which defy all logic and common sense and/or independent verified observations.
There are many different adultery related crimes and the punishment is usually muwt ta-muwt and sometimes stoning is specified (as in Deut 2223-24)
Muwt ta-muwt is used often in the Torah?.it is used after many transgressions as a punishment.
Adam was told he would mout-ta-mout on the day that he ate of the tree in the garden and he did not die until hundreds of years later.(Genesis 217).
Often times the concept of death is turning away from God by transgressing or sinning. Whereas turning back to God and asking for forgiveness, correcting ones ways etc is metaphorically called ?life.?
Eze 1831 Cast away from you all your transgressions, wherein ye have transgressed; and make you a new heart and a new spirit; for why will ye die, O house of Israel?
Eze 1832 For I have no pleasure in the death of him that dieth, saith the Lord GOD; wherefore turn yourselves, and live.Psa 11516 The heavens are the heavens of the LORD; but the earth hath He given to the children of men.
Psa 11517 The dead praise not the LORD, neither any that go down into silence;
Psa 64 (65) Return, O LORD, deliver my soul; save me for Thy mercy's sake.
Psa 65 (66) For in death there is no remembrance of Thee; in the nether-world who will give Thee thanks?
Life is connected with the keeping of God?s law and appoints death for the transgression of it
Lev 185 Ye shall therefore keep my statutes, and my judgments which if a man do, he shall live in them I am the LORD.
Deu 3019 I call heaven and earth to record this day against you, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing therefore choose life, that both thou and thy seed may live
Deu 3020 That thou mayest love the LORD thy God, and that thou mayest obey his voice, and that thou mayest cleave unto him for he is thy life, and the length of thy days that thou mayest dwell in the land which the LORD swore unto thy fathers, to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob, to give them.
Deu 83 And he humbled thee, and suffered thee to hunger, and fed thee with manna, which thou knewest not, neither did thy fathers know; that he might make thee know that man doth not live by bread only, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of the LORD doth man live.
Muwt/death is used in as many ways in the Bible as it is used in the Quran. Death can be the death of the body, or spiritual death of being removed from God.
The harsh punishment of physical death (muwt ta-muwt) for adultery or other crimes in the OT was a physical punishment that beni Isreal could enforce, but only after a judicial process.
The punishment could be carried out if they took the matter before one of their judges and were found guilty of the crime.
There was a process of
- accusing someone,
- going before a judge (who heard both sides of the stories),
- presenting witnesses
- the judge issuing a sentence
- and the punishment being carried out,
This is much like many judicial systems today.
One could not just arbitrarily start throwing stones at someone based on a suspected crime. LOL
What many forget is that There are chapters and verses on sin offerings and atonement sacrafices that could be made after someone sinned. And then the sin was forgiven and the person could go on with life.
This happened many times with the WHOLE COMMUNITY of beni Isreal. Where Aaron made atonement for their sins (where by full extent of the laws given they could have ALL been stoned to death).
So when people who are unfamiliar with the Torah and pick out a verse without understanding the Torah they become very distressed (like some of our friends here on free-minds). Because they do not understand the system.
The Torah is not written like the Quran. The Quran is more poetically written (like psalms) gives a few verses on a subject and moves on. The Torah has chapters and verses dedicated to a subject and reads like a modern day book. You have to read it from the beginning to end to understand what is going on.
It?s also a book of laws. If one looks at a modern day law book one will see that it is written much the same way as the laws in Leviticus. Yet most judges understand that the punishment is the extreme point that they can go to. Same was true in the Torah.
In fact, there are even laws that read?and if the people do not kill him?.God will set his face against the man and cut him off?.etc etc. (This is not the only verse like this). God was always telling the Isrealites that they should fear him and not the people. And to turn to him and walk in his ways and he would forgive them their inequities.
Lev 201 And the LORD spoke unto Moses, saying,
Lev 202 Again, thou shalt say to the children of Israel, Whosoever he be of the children of Israel, or of the strangers that sojourn in Israel, that giveth any of his seed unto Molech; he shall surely be put to death the people of the land shall stone him with stones.
Lev 203 And I will set my face against that man, and will cut him off from among his people; because he hath given of his seed unto Molech, to defile my sanctuary, and to profane my holy name.
Lev 204 And if the people of the land do any ways hide their eyes from the man, when he giveth of his seed unto Molech, and kill him not
Lev 205 Then I will set my face against that man, and against his family, and will cut him off, and all that go a whoring after him, to commit whoredom with Molech, from among their people.
As for the punishment of adultery In the Injeel
Joh 84 They say unto him, Master, this woman was taken in adultery, in the very act.
Joh 85 Now Moses in the law commanded us, that such should be stoned but what sayest thou?
Joh 86 This they said, tempting him, that they might have to accuse him. But Jesus stooped down, and with his finger wrote on the ground, as though he heard them not.
Joh 87 So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.
Joh 88 And again he stooped down, and wrote on the ground.
Joh 89 And they which heard it, being convicted by their own conscience, went out one by one, beginning at the eldest, even unto the last and Jesus was left alone, and the woman standing in the midst.
Joh 810 When Jesus had lifted up himself, and saw none but the woman, he said unto her, Woman, where are those thine accusers? hath no man condemned thee?
Joh 811 She said, No man, Lord. And Jesus said unto her, Neither do I condemn thee go, and sin no more.
Mat 527 Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not commit adultery
Mat 528 But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.
Mat 529 And if thy right eye offend thee, pluck it out, and cast it from thee for it is profitable for thee that one of thy members should perish, and not that thy whole body should be cast into hell.
Mat 530 And if thy right hand offend thee, cut it off, and cast it from thee for it is profitable for thee that one of thy members should perish, and not that thy whole body should be cast into hell.
Mat 531 It hath been said, Whosoever shall put away his wife, let him give her a writing of divorcement
Mat 532 But I say unto you, That whosoever shall put away his wife, saving for the cause of fornication, causeth her to commit adultery and whosoever shall marry her that is divorced committeth adultery.
Isa urged the Isrealites not to be so quick to issue a judgement that was to an extreme. And also urged the people not to be so quick to commit the crime. His admonishment was to both the judges and the transgressors.
Jesus went back to ORIGINAL TORAH and urged transgressors to ADMIT their sins?.ask forgiveness?.and go give the sin offering?.thanking God for his mercy?..INSTEAD of issuing the Punishment that was allowable (not demanded by God but allowed by God).
IF the person went through the repentence/atonement process they could not be punished because they were FORGIVEN.
The judges were not observing the Torah laws because they automatically resorted to violence instead of mercy and not giving the people the option for repentence and the like.
The Quran that tells us that we don?t HAVE to judge (as Isa said judge not lest ye be judged).
The Quran says IF you judge?..judge between them with equity. We can forego judgement and that is better. Because man can only see what is apparent but God sees what is without and within?.therefore man can be deceived and wrong in his judgement?.and man could punish another unfairly (due to not knowing all the facts)
(They are) listeners of a lie, devourers of what is forbidden; therefore if they come to you, judge between them or turn aside from them, and if you turn aside from them, they shall not harm you in any way; and if you judge, judge between them with equity; surely Allah loves those who judge equitably.
JK- Actually i dont beleive that the scripture has been distorted AND THIS IS YOUR FALLACY OF UNDERSTANDING ME. I just say that JUST BECAUSE CERTAIN RELIGIOUS GROUPS NAME THEIR BOOKS TORAH, INJEEL, ETC DOESNT MEAN THAT THEY REALLY ARE. Get it?
You are wrong. Full stop.
(but of course you would rather argue with me....someone who KNOWS rather than use your BRAIN and discover I am right....LOL)
There is carbon dating and discoveries of texts that pre-date both Muhammad and Isa and are the same texts that we have with us today. This is scientific evidence.
Like I said before, your either min al muminoon aw min al kafiroon.
Salam,
Arnab -
Peace "arnab",
Did you forget to read THIS from the SAME PAGE as the link you provided (which I was already familiar with by the way)
The oldest known preserved fragment of a Torah text is a good luck charm inscribed with a text close to, although not identical with, the Priestly Blessing found in Num 624?27, dated to approximately 600 BC (Dever, p. 180). The oldest complete or nearly complete texts are the Dead Sea Scrolls from the middle of the 2nd century BC to the 1st century AD. The DSS contain almost all the books of the Tanakh, although not all are complete.
source http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dating_the_Bible#Oldest_manuscripts
The Masoretic Text, written in Hebrew, became the standard authorized Hebrew text around 100 AD. It existed prior to the writings of the New Testament, confirmed by the Dead Sea Scrolls as early as 168 B.C., and was used as the official Hebrew Old Testament at the time the biblical canon was established.
source http//www.allabouttruth.org/oldest-bible-version-faq.htmBRITISH MUSEUM MAKES IMPORTANT BREAKTHROUGH IN BIBLICAL ARCHAEOLOGY
Rare cuniform tablet
source http//www.24hourmuseum.org.uk/ixbin/hix?IXFIRST=4&IXSS=IXFIRST%3d1%26_IXmode%3dgfx_en%26%2524%2528news%2bor%2bexhibition%2529%2bin%2bart_section%2bindex%2btext_wp2%3d%252e%26_IXSESSION_%3drEQJ_SMJtWB%26%257bSIMPLE%257d%257band%257d%2524%253f%253a%2524%3dbritish%2bmuseum%2bbiblical%26%2524sort%2b%2540descending%2bart_publish_date%3d%252e&_IXmode=gfx_en&IXMAXHITS=1&IXSR=aVL74SBjZQw&IXSPFX=search/full_gfx/&IXSESSION=rEQJ_SMJtWB&submit-button=summaryIsaiah scroll, written by a Judean scribe around 120 B.C.,
http//www.newsvine.com/_news/2008/05/13/1485989-israel-museum-puts-dead-sea-scroll-on-rare-displayIn 1947, seven ancient scrolls were found in pottery urns in caves in the Judean Desert. The scrolls reached antiquities dealers in Bethlehem, and after many vicissitudes they were gathered in Jerusalem and exhibited at the Shrine of the Book in the Israel Museum. One of the first scrolls to be discovered was a full copy of the Book of Isaiah, which provides important evidence for the text of the Bible that was common in Eretz-Israel at the end of the Second Temple period. In time, more and more fragments of scrolls were discovered, some in caves at Nahal Qumran, some at Masada, and some in other places of the Judean Desert. Scholars believe that the most ancient of these scrolls were written around 250 BCE, whereas the latest ones were written in the early second century CE (after the destruction of the Second Temple and the repression of the Bar-Kokhba Rebellion).
source http//aleppocodex.org/links/7.htmlThe Dead Sea Scrolls date from 250 BCE to 68 CE and are our bridge to a period that laid the foundation of western traditions, beliefs and practices throughout the past two millennia.
source http//www.naturalsciences.org/wnew/2008-02-19_deadseascrolls.htmlThere is your Archeological evidence. They PRE DATE both Muhammad and Isa.
jonny_k I'm surprised you even believe in the Quran. Have you read all the people who claim that it is not authentic and that it has been tampered with etc etc? I could post pages of links where people claim they can prove the Quran is a fraud.
The fact is you are either min al muminoon or min al kafiroon.
Why don't you go read about that for a while.
Salam,
ArnabJK- 1st just because they predate both Isa and Muhammad does not mean theyre linked to Moses WHOSE VERY EXISTENCE YET REMAINS TO BE PROVEN. 2ndly the DSS are not exactly similar to the masocretic Hebrew manuscripts
http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dead_Sea_scrolls#Significance
"Although a few of the biblical manuscripts found at Qumran differ significantly from the Masoretic text, most do not."
So there goes the argument of preservation of these manuscripts. As i said the only reasonable way for GOD to protect a scripture is via a numerical structure and in regards to the Bible ive only seen Gen 11 and John 11 exhibiting a signficant enough pattern to be from GOD
http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=13465.0
Last but not least i admit that even the entire Quran has NOT been revealed to us as yet. To claim it has would be living in denial. GOD Bless! -
Peace "arnab",
There are many different adultery related crimes and the punishment is usually muwt ta-muwt and sometimes stoning is specified (as in Deut 2223-24)
JK- WELL thats it! The very specification of stoning allegedly by GOD makes it impossible for the scripture to be from Him. GOD does not prescribe a punishment which is entirely unjust and illogical or do you say adultery is ever a greater crime than murder ore even rape? BUT that is not all. GOD in the OT also allegedly prescribes stoning/burning to death FOR APOSTATES/BLASPHEMERS and it is impossible to justify this as ive explained.
Muwt ta-muwt is used often in the Torah?.it is used after many transgressions as a punishment.
Adam was told he would mout-ta-mout on the day that he ate of the tree in the garden and he did not die until hundreds of years later.(Genesis 217).
Often times the concept of death is turning away from God by transgressing or sinning. Whereas turning back to God and asking for forgiveness, correcting ones ways etc is metaphorically called ?life.?
JK- In case of stoning the prescription is clear and does not refer to allegorical death and that is enough to prove this document is not from GOD.
The harsh punishment of physical death (muwt ta-muwt) for adultery or other crimes in the OT was a physical punishment that beni Isreal could enforce, but only after a judicial process.
JK- This is exactly what im disputing. GOD would never prescribe such penalties for ANY NATION on the planet. Rather hHe would send a message abolishing such vile man made laws. And your forgetting the worse law of stoning/burning blasphemers.
The punishment could be carried out if they took the matter before one of their judges and were found guilty of the crime.
There was a process of
- accusing someone,
- going before a judge (who heard both sides of the stories),
- presenting witnesses
- the judge issuing a sentence
- and the punishment being carried out,
This is much like many judicial systems today.
One could not just arbitrarily start throwing stones at someone based on a suspected crime. LOL
JK- You dont need to mention court procedures. Even "muslims" have court procedures and shariah doesnt allow just arbitrary stoning. THE VERY PUNISHMENT IS UNACEPTABLE. Thats the point you ned to get INTO YOUR HEAD.
What many forget is that There are chapters and verses on sin offerings and atonement sacrafices that could be made after someone sinned. And then the sin was forgiven and the person could go on with life.
This happened many times with the WHOLE COMMUNITY of beni Isreal. Where Aaron made atonement for their sins (where by full extent of the laws given they could have ALL been stoned to death).
So when people who are unfamiliar with the Torah and pick out a verse without understanding the Torah they become very distressed (like some of our friends here on free-minds). Because they do not understand the system.
The Torah is not written like the Quran. The Quran is more poetically written (like psalms) gives a few verses on a subject and moves on. The Torah has chapters and verses dedicated to a subject and reads like a modern day book. You have to read it from the beginning to end to understand what is going on.
JK- As i said the very fact that the OT even allows or suggests such a punishment is enough to say that it is not Divinely inspired.
It?s also a book of laws. If one looks at a modern day law book one will see that it is written much the same way as the laws in Leviticus. Yet most judges understand that the punishment is the extreme point that they can go to. Same was true in the Torah.
JK- You dont need to educate me on all this since im very well aware of this and your not getting my point. Do we see in any modern law book, except shariah which is considered outdated and barabric, a punishment of stoning/burning for aduleters or worse yet blasphemy or apostasy? Such punishments MUST NOT EVEN EXIST IN DIVINE LAW ESPECIALLY NOT FOR SOMETHING AS RELATIVE AS BLASPHEMY. Get this now?
In fact, there are even laws that read?and if the people do not kill him?.God will set his face against the man and cut him off?.etc etc. (This is not the only verse like this). God was always telling the Isrealites that they should fear him and not the people. And to turn to him and walk in his ways and he would forgive them their inequities.
JK- YET the OT suggests a law for killing/stoning blasphemers/apostates. As i said the very suggestion of these is enough to prove the sccripture NOT divine for such LAWS ARE NEVER RIGHT NEVER!
As for the punishment of adultery In the Injeel
Isa urged the Isrealites not to be so quick to issue a judgement that was to an extreme. And also urged the people not to be so quick to commit the crime. His admonishment was to both the judges and the transgressors.
Jesus went back to ORIGINAL TORAH and urged transgressors to ADMIT their sins?.ask forgiveness?.and go give the sin offering?.thanking God for his mercy?..INSTEAD of issuing the Punishment that was allowable (not demanded by God but allowed by God).
IF the person went through the repentence/atonement process they could not be punished because they were FORGIVEN.
JK- Again i said the very existence of the law of stoning is enough to prove the scripture undivine. 2ndly the so called gospels of Jesus are very inconsistent and have been written years after Jesus. This is INDISPUTABLE amongst the scientific community and has been discussed in the 3rd part of the video above by Michael Schermer.
The judges were not observing the Torah laws because they automatically resorted to violence instead of mercy and not giving the people the option for repentence and the like.
The Quran that tells us that we don?t HAVE to judge (as Isa said judge not lest ye be judged).
The Quran says IF you judge?..judge between them with equity. We can forego judgement and that is better. Because man can only see what is apparent but God sees what is without and within?.therefore man can be deceived and wrong in his judgement?.and man could punish another unfairly (due to not knowing all the facts)
JK- The Quran NEVER states any law or so much as a suggestion from GOD that apostates should be killed. If it did i would never have accepted it as the Word of GOD as ive explained to you many times now.
You are wrong. Full stop.
(but of course you would rather argue with me....someone who KNOWS rather than use your BRAIN and discover I am right....LOL)
There is carbon dating and discoveries of texts that pre-date both Muhammad and Isa and are the same texts that we have with us today. This is scientific evidence.
JK- As i mentioned earlier just because manuscripts are older than Isa and Muhammad does not mean they belong to the person who is claimed to have originally received them i.e. Moses in this case. There is NO arch evidence for the very existence of Moses till today so how can you say those are the original manuscripts? Yes part of those scriptures maybe correct and the Jews and Christians were asked to realize Muhammad saying the truth via that small truthful part which the people of the book still possessed. that was enough for them at that time because they knew Muhammad could not possibly have known even that.
Like I said before, your either min al muminoon aw min al kafiroon.
Salam,
ArnabJK- Another black and white classification of yours. There are many shades of grey and many levels of kufr and imaan. GOD Bless!
-
Peace "arnab",
JK- 1st just because they predate both Isa and Muhammad does not mean theyre linked to Moses WHOSE VERY EXISTENCE YET REMAINS TO BE PROVEN.
So, you don't even believe in the Quran verses on Moses??
If you don't believe that he exists then what about THE HUGE number of verses in the Quran regarding MOSES?
2ndly the DSS are not exactly similar to the masocretic Hebrew manuscripts
http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dead_Sea_scrolls#Significance
"Although a few of the biblical manuscripts found at Qumran differ significantly from the Masoretic text, most do not."Yes, there are books in the Dead Sea Scrolls that we were not previously aware of.
As i said the only reasonable way for GOD to protect a scripture is via a numerical structure and in regards to the Bible ive only seen Gen 11 and John 11 exhibiting a signficant enough pattern to be from GOD
http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=13465.0
Last but not least i admit that even the entire Quran has NOT been revealed to us as yet. To claim it has would be living in denial. GOD Bless!rotfl
You should read what I wrote here http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=16727.0 ;D
Salam,
Arnab -
salaam,
it depends on what you understand about 'kitab'.
'kitab' is (s) piece of writing, record, paper; letter, note, message; document, deed; contract (esp. in marriage); book.
my personal comprehension on 'kitab' is message'. thus, 'ahl al-kitab' in my comprehension is 'those given the message'.
interesting question
in what form was al-qur'an revealed to prophet muhammad? or those messages revealed to other prophets? for a clue, read the earlier surah (by revelation order). there are verses that indicate that the humans would like, or prefer to receive messages in printed sheets.peace
jb
Salaam,
Tradionally we understood that this refers to jews and Christains but then it should have said "People of the books"
My question is, without referring to hadiths; who are people of the book?peace
farida -
Peace "arnab",
So, you don't even believe in the Quran verses on Moses??
If you don't believe that he exists then what about THE HUGE number of verses in the Quran regarding MOSES?
JK- Those quranic verses as i said ARE NUMERICALLY CONNECTED to other verses which shows that they belong to the Quran. Without this i wouldnt know whether those verses are Quranic or not. This is what ive been trying to explain to you before but you dont seem to get it. Besides this none of verses which even you accept as Quran contain any sort of illogical and absurd laws/suggestions/prescriptions as the OT Bible and the list of injustice in the OT is VERY LONG. Here http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9596928.msg174946#msg174946
Yes, there are books in the Dead Sea Scrolls that we were not previously aware of.
rotfl
You should read what I wrote here http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=16727.0 ;D
Salam,
ArnabJK- Not only that but there are DISCREPANCIES with the masocretic manuscripts. The manuscripts which supposedly contain the Quran also contain differences even if not that much but i say if GOD says He'll protect a scripture Hed do it down tot he minimum possible which is the LETTER. GOD Bless!
-
Peace "arnab",
JK- WELL thats it! The very specification of stoning allegedly by GOD makes it impossible for the scripture to be from Him. GOD does not prescribe a punishment which is entirely unjust and illogical or do you say adultery is ever a greater crime than murder ore even rape? BUT that is not all. GOD in the OT also allegedly prescribes stoning/burning to death FOR APOSTATES/BLASPHEMERS and it is impossible to justify this as ive explained.
JK- In case of stoning the prescription is clear and does not refer to allegorical death and that is enough to prove this document is not from GOD.
JK- This is exactly what im disputing. GOD would never prescribe such penalties for ANY NATION on the planet. Rather hHe would send a message abolishing such vile man made laws. And your forgetting the worse law of stoning/burning blasphemers.
JK- You dont need to mention court procedures. Even "muslims" have court procedures and shariah doesnt allow just arbitrary stoning. THE VERY PUNISHMENT IS UNACEPTABLE. Thats the point you ned to get INTO YOUR HEAD.
JK- As i said the very fact that the OT even allows or suggests such a punishment is enough to say that it is not Divinely inspired.
JK- You dont need to educate me on all this since im very well aware of this and your not getting my point. Do we see in any modern law book, except shariah which is considered outdated and barabric, a punishment of stoning/burning for aduleters or worse yet blasphemy or apostasy? Such punishments MUST NOT EVEN EXIST IN DIVINE LAW ESPECIALLY NOT FOR SOMETHING AS RELATIVE AS BLASPHEMY. Get this now?
JK- YET the OT suggests a law for killing/stoning blasphemers/apostates. As i said the very suggestion of these is enough to prove the sccripture NOT divine for such LAWS ARE NEVER RIGHT NEVER!
JK- Again i said the very existence of the law of stoning is enough to prove the scripture undivine. 2ndly the so called gospels of Jesus are very inconsistent and have been written years after Jesus. This is INDISPUTABLE amongst the scientific community and has been discussed in the 3rd part of the video above by Michael Schermer.
JK- The Quran NEVER states any law or so much as a suggestion from GOD that apostates should be killed. If it did i would never have accepted it as the Word of GOD as ive explained to you many times now.
JK- As i mentioned earlier just because manuscripts are older than Isa and Muhammad does not mean they belong to the person who is claimed to have originally received them i.e. Moses in this case. There is NO arch evidence for the very existence of Moses till today so how can you say those are the original manuscripts? Yes part of those scriptures maybe correct and the Jews and Christians were asked to realize Muhammad saying the truth via that small truthful part which the people of the book still possessed. that was enough for them at that time because they knew Muhammad could not possibly have known even that.
JK- Another black and white classification of yours. There are many shades of grey and many levels of kufr and imaan. GOD Bless!
Ok, you don't believe...you've said that multiple times in this ONE post....is there anything NEW that you would like to add?
2171
The example of such disbelievers is that of
parrots who repeat what they hear of sounds and calls,
without understanding.
Deaf, dumb, and blind; they cannot understand.
Salam,
Arnab -
Peace "arnab",
Ok, you don't believe...you've said that multiple times in this ONE post....is there anything NEW that you would like to add?
2171
The example of such disbelievers is that of
parrots who repeat what they hear of sounds and calls,
without understanding.
Deaf, dumb, and blind; they cannot understand.
Salam,
ArnabJK- I think im anything than deaf , dumb and blind and neither are the scientific minded people whove lead us out of the dark ages where exactly the suggestions/laws of the OT Bible were applicable. You need a serious reality check. I dont just beleive anything is from GOD just because it says so. I use my GOD given senses and anlyse everything carefully and I do believe that the Quran is the Word of GOD and so are the Torah, Psalms and Injeel non of which have been fully revealed to us yet though and i also beleive ALL OF THEM are NUMERICALLY STRUCTURED and that will be the only way theyd be revealed to us fully GW. GOD Bless!
-
I use my GOD given senses and anlyse everything carefully and I do believe that the Quran is the Word of GOD and so are the Torah, Psalms and Injeel non of which have been fully revealed to us yet though and i also beleive ALL OF THEM are NUMERICALLY STRUCTURED and that will be the only way theyd be revealed to us fully GW. GOD Bless!
Al-Qur'an teaches us that these books are inspired. However, it places specific emphasis on them, telling us to believe in them - this wouldn't be possible if they weren't revealed to us in entirety. You can't believe in books you've never seen, especially if you think they haven't even been revealed entirely, so obviously, these divinely-inspired books must be somewhere within our grasp, so we can study, understand, and believe in them alongside al-Qur'an... Plus, there is nowhere (that I've seen at least) in al-Qur'an that says that any one of these other books is numerically structured - that is an assumption, but it is not verified anywhere in the Scriptures...
Peace.
-
Peace "ahmad bilal",
Al-Qur'an teaches us that these books are inspired. However, it places specific emphasis on them, telling us to believe in them - this wouldn't be possible if they weren't revealed to us in entirety. You can't believe in books you've never seen, especially if you think they haven't even been revealed entirely, so obviously, these divinely-inspired books must be somewhere within our grasp, so we can study, understand, and believe in them alongside al-Qur'an... Plus, there is nowhere (that I've seen at least) in al-Qur'an that says that any one of these other books is numerically structured - that is an assumption, but it is not verified anywhere in the Scriptures...
JK- NO they do not need to be immediately in our grasp. Ill give you an example why this argument is false. Consider the people who cant read or write? How can they even have access to the Quran? How about those people who dont know classical Arabic? They still need time to get access to the Quranic message dont they? How about the difference between hafs and warsh manuscripts and readings? We needed time to figure out which is the true Quran. Besides this there are many statements in the Quran like "7 heavens" etc which we dont yet understand. Thus it is enough if we see part of a book to beleive that theyr from GOD if theres enough evidence to support this. In regards to the numerical stucture that is BASED ON OBSERVATIONAL evidence applied on the scriptures as is the case with so many other things in science. Check out my link on the numerical structure of gen 11 and john 11 and itll be self evident to you that this is not a coincidental pattern
http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=13465.0
GOD Bless! -
Al-Qur'an teaches us that these books are inspired. However, it places specific emphasis on them, telling us to believe in them - this wouldn't be possible if they weren't revealed to us in entirety. You can't believe in books you've never seen, especially if you think they haven't even been revealed entirely, so obviously, these divinely-inspired books must be somewhere within our grasp, so we can study, understand, and believe in them alongside al-Qur'an...
Salam,
Well said. peace
Plus, there is nowhere (that I've seen at least) in al-Qur'an that says that any one of these other books is numerically structured - that is an assumption, but it is not verified anywhere in the Scriptures...
The numerical code is a fabrication revolving around mathematical apophenia.
Salam,
Arnab -
Salam, Arnab,
So, Is what I am quoting underneath revealed? If it is revealed, who revealed it to whom?
Genesis 6 (King James Version)
King James Version (KJV)
Public Domain"Genesis 6
1And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them,
2That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose.
3And the LORD said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years.
4There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.
5And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.
6And it repented the LORD that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart."
Salaam
Salam Huruf,
It was revealed to Moses.
We know that there was an oral tradition that was passed down through out the generations before Moses.
We know that for generations God's laws were observed by some including Abraham.
We know that Abraham was a muslim, upright and an example for all generations.
This was before the Torah was written down.So the question is did Moses recieve this previous revelation (history that happened before he was born)
because it was revelation given to Abraham or Noah or another prophet from God and Moses recieved it via oral tradition?
or was it revelation direct from God at the time of the Torah?
I don't know the answer to that.
Salam,
Arnab -
Peace "arnab",
GOD does not prescribe a punishment which is entirely unjust and illogical or do you say adultery is ever a greater crime than murder ore even rape? BUT that is not all. GOD in the OT also allegedly prescribes stoning/burning to death FOR APOSTATES/BLASPHEMERS and it is impossible to justify this as ive explained.
Moses said, in the Quran, that God prescribed death for Israiles Blasphemers
(
And Moses said to his people "O my people! Verily, you have wronged yourselves by worshipping the calf. So turn in repentance to your Creator and kill yourselves, that will be better for you with your Creator." Then He accepted your repentance. Truly, He is the One Who accepts repentance, the Most Merciful. (2-54)JK!! Please Think before answering, PLEASE pr
-
Moses said, in the Quran, that God prescribed death for Israiles Blasphemers
(
And Moses said to his people "O my people! Verily, you have wronged yourselves by worshipping the calf. So turn in repentance to your Creator and kill yourselves, that will be better for you with your Creator." Then He accepted your repentance. Truly, He is the One Who accepts repentance, the Most Merciful. (2-54)JK!! Please Think before answering, PLEASE pr
Peace belalhammad, and everyone.
The focus of this Scripture tells exactly what the context is. It says
"And Moses said to his people 'O my people! Verily, you have wronged yourselves by worshipping the calf. So turn in repentance to your Creator and kill yourselves, that will be better for you with your Creator.'"
According to this text, Mousa was saying that the Israelites would be demonstrating their repentence by 'killing themselves', and this would lead to their being forgiven by God. However, after that, it says
"Then He accepted your repentance. Truly, He is the One Who accepts repentance, the Most Merciful."
Now, in that Scripture, it doesn't say anything about them literally killing themselves and being raised up again as a sign of God's mercy - it simply says that they were forgiven, and God accepted their repentence. This implies that God wasn't speaking of them LITERALLY killing themselves, physically committing suicide. He was speaking of them killing their "egos" and their "pride", which is literally a form of repentence. We aren't instructed by God to actually kill ourselves - suicide is condemned in al-Qur'an...
Peace.
-
Peace belalhammad, and everyone.
The focus of this Scripture tells exactly what the context is. It says
"And Moses said to his people 'O my people! Verily, you have wronged yourselves by worshipping the calf. So turn in repentance to your Creator and kill yourselves, that will be better for you with your Creator.'"
According to this text, Mousa was saying that the Israelites would be demonstrating their repentence by 'killing themselves', and this would lead to their being forgiven by God. However, after that, it says
"Then He accepted your repentance. Truly, He is the One Who accepts repentance, the Most Merciful."
Now, in that Scripture, it doesn't say anything about them literally killing themselves and being raised up again as a sign of God's mercy - it simply says that they were forgiven, and God accepted their repentence. This implies that God wasn't speaking of them LITERALLY killing themselves, physically committing suicide. He was speaking of them killing their "egos" and their "pride", which is literally a form of repentence. We aren't instructed by God to actually kill ourselves - suicide is condemned in al-Qur'an...
Peace.
exactly right peace
-
He was speaking of them killing their "egos" and their "pride", which is literally a form of repentence. We aren't instructed by God to actually kill ourselves - suicide is condemned in al-Qur'an...
Peace.
Salaam,
Although my Arabic understanding is not very good but I too understand that nafs, among other meanings, also means ego and pride and that we must kill this part of ourself.
peace -
Peace belalhammad, and everyone.
The focus of this Scripture tells exactly what the context is. It says
"And Moses said to his people 'O my people! Verily, you have wronged yourselves by worshipping the calf. So turn in repentance to your Creator and kill yourselves, that will be better for you with your Creator.'"
According to this text, Mousa was saying that the Israelites would be demonstrating their repentence by 'killing themselves', and this would lead to their being forgiven by God. However, after that, it says
"Then He accepted your repentance. Truly, He is the One Who accepts repentance, the Most Merciful."
Now, in that Scripture, it doesn't say anything about them literally killing themselves and being raised up again as a sign of God's mercy - it simply says that they were forgiven, and God accepted their repentence. This implies that God wasn't speaking of them LITERALLY killing themselves, physically committing suicide. He was speaking of them killing their "egos" and their "pride", which is literally a form of repentence. We aren't instructed by God to actually kill ourselves - suicide is condemned in al-Qur'an...
Peace.
Peace,
The meaning of 2-54 can be used to support that killing was the punishment for Isrealis Blasphemers, as Arnab showed from Torah. I understood the meanining of this verse as you do untill Arnab showed us the Torah Punshment, then, I changed my understanding.
Let me give you another example from Quran were God shows that he could have commanded us to Kill ourselves when commetting Koffer, but He Chose not to due to our weakness (few of us would have obay the order)(
If We had ordered them to Kill themselves or to leave their homes, very few of them would have done it but if they had done what they were (actually) told, it would have been best for them, and would have gone farthest to strengthen their (faith). (4-66)
Peace