Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. question about Al-Fatiha

question about Al-Fatiha

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
39 Posts 12 Posters 739 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • WakasW Offline
    WakasW Offline
    Wakas
    wrote on last edited by
    #5

    peace Arnab, all,

    Using cross-reference, the more accurate translation is indeed "beings".

    This has been discussed before.

    All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • N Offline
      N Offline
      nerspi
      wrote on last edited by
      #6

      peace

      thanks for the replies all

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • U Offline
        U Offline
        unknownuser
        wrote on last edited by
        #7

        peace Arnab, all,

        Using cross-reference, the more accurate translation is indeed "beings".

        This has been discussed before.

        Salam Wakas,

        Respectfully, I disagree. My understanding is different.
        But Alhamdullilah we have this site where we can all share our understandings.

        Salam,
        Arnab

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • S Offline
          S Offline
          siki
          wrote on last edited by
          #8

          Aalem------- everything , all creation.
          Aalim------- All knowing.

          so , is it Aalemeen or Aalimeen?

          peace

          siki

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • J Offline
            J Offline
            Joe_Betik
            wrote on last edited by
            #9

            salaam

            to each his own, indeed. and perhaps we all can ponder upon this understanding;

            1. In the Name of Allah, the Compassionate Mercy.
            2. Praised be Allah, the Lord of knowledge.
            3. The Compassionate Mercy; 4. reigning the principle of time.
            4. Only You we serve; with You we have a recourse.
            5. Guide us on the honorable path; 7. the path of those You made pleasant upon them; not the objects of anger, nor the misguided.

            peace
            joe

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • U Offline
              U Offline
              unknownuser
              wrote on last edited by
              #10

              Salam,

              Aalem------- everything , all creation.
              Aalim------- All knowing.

              so , is it Aalemeen or Aalimeen?

              peace

              siki

              It is my understanding that the only difference is in the diacriticals which are not in the original Quran. So I try to stay true to the original meaning of the root as closely as possible. the root ayn-lam-meem in arabic means "to know." I believe with the ya and nun added this would make the root plural. So my understanding is that the word would be knowledge plural or knowledges (which would be improper English grammar) or all knowledge. Something close to that anyway.

              And the definition above makes sense to me.
              As Allah is all knowing.

              There is another root for creation so I think logically ayn-lam-meem cannot be confused with the other root. If "creation" or "beings" were to be meant then the roots for those words would have been used.

              Salam,
              Arnab

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S Offline
                S Offline
                Samia
                wrote on last edited by
                #11

                Salam,

                It is my understanding that the only difference is in the diacriticals which are not in the original Quran. So I try to stay true to the original meaning of the root as closely as possible. the root ayn-lam-meem in arabic means "to know." I believe with the ya and nun added this would make the root plural. So my understanding is that the word would be knowledge plural or knowledges (which would be improper English grammar) or all knowledge. Something close to that anyway.

                And the definition above makes sense to me.
                As Allah is all knowing.

                There is another root for creation so I think logically ayn-lam-meem cannot be confused with the other root. If "creation" or "beings" were to be meant then the roots for those words would have been used.

                Salam,
                Arnab

                As you say, without diacriticals, there wont be a difference between the two plurals 3alimeen (knowledgeable people) and 3alameen (creation, worlds). But with the help of context, and/or commonsene, we can make the better choice.

                If we choose "3alimeen" knowledgeable, would it mean that God is not the Lord of the unknowledgeable?

                We also have in other verses "Lord of the heavens and the earth". This, I think, is nearer to (beings/creation/worlds) than to (knowledge/knowledgeable)

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • U Offline
                  U Offline
                  unknownuser
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #12

                  Salam Samia,

                  As you say, without diacriticals, there wont be a difference between the two plurals 3alimeen (knowledgeable people) and 3alameen (creation, worlds). But with the help of context, and/or commonsene, we can make the better choice.
                  If we choose "3alimeen" knowledgeable, would it mean that God is not the Lord of the unknowledgeable?
                  We also have in other verses "Lord of the heavens and the earth". This, I think, is nearer to (beings/creation/worlds) than to (knowledge/knowledgeable)

                  Please re-read what I posted.

                  I translate ayn-lam-meem to mean "to know" or "all knowledge"

                  not the possesors of knowledge (such as knowledgable people or creation).

                  Salam,
                  Arnab

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • S Offline
                    S Offline
                    siki
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #13

                    Dear Arnab

                    you have a point ,, but i feel , that all beings or all creation, makes more sense here.

                    ILLIm is knowledge, and the one who is knowledgable is knows as Aalim, so here plural does not fit in properly.

                    peace

                    siki

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • WakasW Offline
                      WakasW Offline
                      Wakas
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #14

                      peace Arnab, all,

                      I think if you are going to give a meaning for a word, and you are ignoring the diacritical markings, then please make it clear to the forum, especially to the person who asked the question. In this case, I was unaware Arnab was not using the diacritical markings, hence my reply.

                      Furthermore, I do not believe there is only one root = one unique meaning. Having reviewed several hundred roots in a fair amount of detail for PRL, I do not see this thinking as valid at all.

                      All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • U Offline
                        U Offline
                        unknownuser
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #15

                        Salam Wakas,

                        Furthermore, I do not believe there is only one root = one unique meaning. Having reviewed several hundred roots in a fair amount of detail for PRL, I do not see this thinking as valid at all.

                        I agree that a root can have several meanings but they all center around the same main idea usually. And I try to stick to the purest definition of the root which limits the differences in the definitions. I also like to study the history of the word in the semitic languages to discover a richer meaning of the word. I try to stay away from evolved meanings in Arabic.

                        Salam,
                        Arnab

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • L Offline
                          L Offline
                          lovelymoslems
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #16

                          peace

                          i have a question about al-fatiha
                          what is the correct way to translate 12 Alhamdu lillahi rabbi alAAalameena

                          is it "Praise be to God, the Lord of the worlds"?
                          or "All praise is due to Allah, the Lord of the Worlds"?
                          or "You, Allah, the Lord of the Worlds, we praise"?

                          "All praise is due to Allah, the Robb of the universe.

                          Robb is the only Creator, Rules and Laws Maker, Controller, Giving Knowlegdes

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • A Offline
                            A Offline
                            AaRoN
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #17

                            the recognition to the divine - lord of the knowns

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • S Offline
                              S Offline
                              Samia
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #18

                              the recognition to the divine - lord of the knowns

                              What about the "unknowns"? Isn't He "The Knowledgeable of the seen and the unseen"? (3aalimul ghaibi wash-shahaadati )

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • A Offline
                                A Offline
                                AaRoN
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #19

                                unseen doesn't mean unknown... unless you either don't know about the wind or have seen the wind.

                                look at it this way... either it is speakin towards god being the lord of everything we know, which would mean he is the lord of everything we encounter as our knowledge expands... or god is the lord of everything god knows

                                you're welcome to come up with a better meaning that utilises the meaning of the root 'lm as opposed to "lord of the universe" or "lord of the creation" but that's what i have for now )

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • P Offline
                                  P Offline
                                  phoenix1
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #20

                                  unseen probably does mean unknown. To see is to know. Figuratively speaking.
                                  I think the unseen refers kind of to the future. We don't know what's going to happen exactly, but if we have trust in god and his laws, we know that we can...control it?

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • T Offline
                                    T Offline
                                    TheNabi
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #21

                                    Peace

                                    Ghayb is a state relevant to the finite adam. Not to the One from which nothing is hidden.

                                    Joe

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • A Offline
                                      A Offline
                                      AaRoN
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #22

                                      i guess since it's unseen and unknown nobody can really say for sure at this juncture

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • U Offline
                                        U Offline
                                        unknownuser
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #23

                                        Peace all,

                                        "Rabb" is sustainer/nourisher which implies a material subject which needs to be sustained or nourished. All knowledge is already possessed by The God; He does not have to sustain or nourish it. Sustainer/nourisher of all beings/creation makes more sense, because beings/creation need to be nourished and sustained.

                                        The primary significance of "rabb" is "bringing a thing to a state of completion by degrees", which implies an evolving process. The God already has and always had all knowledge in its entirety, and He does not need to bring it to a state of completion by degrees, which would imply an imperfect God to start with.

                                        One can say that "rabb" can also mean "owner/master" but that is not its primary meaning.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • WakasW Offline
                                          WakasW Offline
                                          Wakas
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #24

                                          peace Tanveer, all,

                                          Nice pick up on the "rabb" implication. I have "AAalameena" as creations/beings. Contrary to what some might think, this meaning is perfectly in coherence with the core theme of the root. The following is a quote from PRL (emphasis mine)

                                          Ayn-Lam-Miim = to mark/sign/distinguish, creations/beings, world, science/learning/knowledge/information, aware/know. By means of which one knows a thing, hence it signifies world or creation, because by it the Creator is known. alim (pl. ulama) - one who is learned/wise or knows.

                                          http//www.studyquran.co.uk/PRLonline.htm

                                          All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users