Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. question about Al-Fatiha

question about Al-Fatiha

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
39 Posts 12 Posters 737 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    siki
    wrote on last edited by
    #13

    Dear Arnab

    you have a point ,, but i feel , that all beings or all creation, makes more sense here.

    ILLIm is knowledge, and the one who is knowledgable is knows as Aalim, so here plural does not fit in properly.

    peace

    siki

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • WakasW Offline
      WakasW Offline
      Wakas
      wrote on last edited by
      #14

      peace Arnab, all,

      I think if you are going to give a meaning for a word, and you are ignoring the diacritical markings, then please make it clear to the forum, especially to the person who asked the question. In this case, I was unaware Arnab was not using the diacritical markings, hence my reply.

      Furthermore, I do not believe there is only one root = one unique meaning. Having reviewed several hundred roots in a fair amount of detail for PRL, I do not see this thinking as valid at all.

      All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • U Offline
        U Offline
        unknownuser
        wrote on last edited by
        #15

        Salam Wakas,

        Furthermore, I do not believe there is only one root = one unique meaning. Having reviewed several hundred roots in a fair amount of detail for PRL, I do not see this thinking as valid at all.

        I agree that a root can have several meanings but they all center around the same main idea usually. And I try to stick to the purest definition of the root which limits the differences in the definitions. I also like to study the history of the word in the semitic languages to discover a richer meaning of the word. I try to stay away from evolved meanings in Arabic.

        Salam,
        Arnab

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • L Offline
          L Offline
          lovelymoslems
          wrote on last edited by
          #16

          peace

          i have a question about al-fatiha
          what is the correct way to translate 12 Alhamdu lillahi rabbi alAAalameena

          is it "Praise be to God, the Lord of the worlds"?
          or "All praise is due to Allah, the Lord of the Worlds"?
          or "You, Allah, the Lord of the Worlds, we praise"?

          "All praise is due to Allah, the Robb of the universe.

          Robb is the only Creator, Rules and Laws Maker, Controller, Giving Knowlegdes

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • A Offline
            A Offline
            AaRoN
            wrote on last edited by
            #17

            the recognition to the divine - lord of the knowns

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • S Offline
              S Offline
              Samia
              wrote on last edited by
              #18

              the recognition to the divine - lord of the knowns

              What about the "unknowns"? Isn't He "The Knowledgeable of the seen and the unseen"? (3aalimul ghaibi wash-shahaadati )

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • A Offline
                A Offline
                AaRoN
                wrote on last edited by
                #19

                unseen doesn't mean unknown... unless you either don't know about the wind or have seen the wind.

                look at it this way... either it is speakin towards god being the lord of everything we know, which would mean he is the lord of everything we encounter as our knowledge expands... or god is the lord of everything god knows

                you're welcome to come up with a better meaning that utilises the meaning of the root 'lm as opposed to "lord of the universe" or "lord of the creation" but that's what i have for now )

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • P Offline
                  P Offline
                  phoenix1
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #20

                  unseen probably does mean unknown. To see is to know. Figuratively speaking.
                  I think the unseen refers kind of to the future. We don't know what's going to happen exactly, but if we have trust in god and his laws, we know that we can...control it?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • T Offline
                    T Offline
                    TheNabi
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #21

                    Peace

                    Ghayb is a state relevant to the finite adam. Not to the One from which nothing is hidden.

                    Joe

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • A Offline
                      A Offline
                      AaRoN
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #22

                      i guess since it's unseen and unknown nobody can really say for sure at this juncture

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • U Offline
                        U Offline
                        unknownuser
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #23

                        Peace all,

                        "Rabb" is sustainer/nourisher which implies a material subject which needs to be sustained or nourished. All knowledge is already possessed by The God; He does not have to sustain or nourish it. Sustainer/nourisher of all beings/creation makes more sense, because beings/creation need to be nourished and sustained.

                        The primary significance of "rabb" is "bringing a thing to a state of completion by degrees", which implies an evolving process. The God already has and always had all knowledge in its entirety, and He does not need to bring it to a state of completion by degrees, which would imply an imperfect God to start with.

                        One can say that "rabb" can also mean "owner/master" but that is not its primary meaning.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • WakasW Offline
                          WakasW Offline
                          Wakas
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #24

                          peace Tanveer, all,

                          Nice pick up on the "rabb" implication. I have "AAalameena" as creations/beings. Contrary to what some might think, this meaning is perfectly in coherence with the core theme of the root. The following is a quote from PRL (emphasis mine)

                          Ayn-Lam-Miim = to mark/sign/distinguish, creations/beings, world, science/learning/knowledge/information, aware/know. By means of which one knows a thing, hence it signifies world or creation, because by it the Creator is known. alim (pl. ulama) - one who is learned/wise or knows.

                          http//www.studyquran.co.uk/PRLonline.htm

                          All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • A Offline
                            A Offline
                            AaRoN
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #25

                            tanveer perhaps god is bringing the knowledge to completion in degrees for us, and it has nothing to do with what god knows, but what god reveals to us as knowledge.

                            if that implies an imperfect god for you then i can't really help what it implies for you, that's something you have to answer for... suddenly bringing up some sort of implication of imperfection... is that the first thing you see? or is it merely an argument to try and dissuade from thinking different than your own, by stating that those who think thusly are implying imperfection?

                            thanks wakas i will consider what you said... but does it literally mean creation, or does it mean creation by way of relation, ie because creation is that by which we come to know then creation is related to the root... does the root truly hold this meaning? i don't know... anyways at least you said somethin when you saw somethin goin on and contributed... thanks!

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • WakasW Offline
                              WakasW Offline
                              Wakas
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #26

                              peace Aaron, all,

                              There is actually a sign in AQ answering explicitly what Lord of the AAalameena is (I think it was a Q asked by Pharoah to Moses?), cant recall the specific sign and I dont have my concordance with me, but thought I'd mention it.

                              All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • WakasW Offline
                                WakasW Offline
                                Wakas
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #27

                                Found it

                                2623-24

                                Transliteration Qala firAAawnu wama rabbu alAAalameena
                                Literal Pharaoh said "And what (is) the creations all together's/(universes&#039 Lord?"
                                Free-Minds Pharaoh said "And what is the Lord of the worlds?"

                                Transliteration Qala rabbu alssamawati waal-ardi wama baynahuma in kuntum mooqineena
                                Literal He (Moses) said "Lord (of) the skies/space and the earth/Planet Earth, and what (is) between them (B), if youwere sure/certain."
                                Free-Minds He said "The Lord of the heavens and the Earth and all that is between them, if you are aware."

                                All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • A Offline
                                  A Offline
                                  AaRoN
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #28

                                  so is that answering what is 'alamiyn or saying that rabb al 'alamiyn is the same thing as the rabb of all the other stuff?

                                  i don't know, nothin to make too big of an issue of considering all the other translations that need to be fixed hahaha

                                  thanks for the posts wakas

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • I Offline
                                    I Offline
                                    ImamQuranonly
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #29

                                    As-Salaamu Alaikum all,

                                    Nice thread. I like both translations. Lord of all the worlds/creations/knowledge/systems of knowledge, etc. Please excuse me for adding some of my own words that are not direct translations, but I am trying to emphasize the expansiveness of the word all together. I think sometimes we feel that a word or ayat from Al Quran has to mean only one thing, but when we all think about it; most of us will agree that many if not most of the ayaat have more than one meaning. Usually a physical connection and a spiritual connection. Allah knows best. Hope that this adds something beneficial, insha Allah.

                                    As-Salaamu Alaikum, peace

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • L Offline
                                      L Offline
                                      lovelymoslems
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #30

                                      When Allah claims Himself as Robb, people are still seeking their own robb, then such people fighting against Allah as Robb eventhough they read Al Fathehah 17 times a day.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • N Offline
                                        N Offline
                                        nerspi
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #31

                                        peace

                                        can i just ask one more thing about al fatiha?

                                        if praying alone and while saying the fatiha, is it alright to change certain words like instead of "You alone we serve" to say "You alone i serve"
                                        and instead of "guide us to the straight path" to say "guide me to the straight path"?

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • S Offline
                                          S Offline
                                          Samia
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #32

                                          peace

                                          can i just ask one more thing about al fatiha?

                                          if praying alone and while saying the fatiha, is it alright to change certain words like instead of "You alone we serve" to say "You alone i serve"
                                          and instead of "guide us to the straight path" to say "guide me to the straight path"?

                                          I take "praying" as "salaat"

                                          And why don't you want to include the others with you?

                                          I do not think it is alright, even if you were praying in a foreign language. It is like suggesting that your wordings are more appropriate than God's.

                                          But if you mean praye as in "du3aa"
                                          You can borrow parts of al-fatiha or from any other chapter that you find adequate to what you are asking

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users