Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. General Issues / Questions
  4. Remembering the true nature of our enemy

Remembering the true nature of our enemy

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Issues / Questions
115 Posts 25 Posters 6.3k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Y Offline
    Y Offline
    Yosemite
    wrote on last edited by
    #90

    On the contrary, there is a verse whose wording has been forgotten, but the ruling still applies, it is called the Verse of Rajm (stoning).

    Are you saying that Allah could not guard the full integrity and truth of His book?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • S Offline
      S Offline
      Samia
      wrote on last edited by
      #91

      The recitation of the verse of rajm was abrogated, but its ruling is still applicable.

      Hazrat Umar (ra) said No doubt, Allah sent Muhammad (sallallahu alaihi wa salaam) with the Truth and revealed to him the Book (Quran), and among what was revealed, was the Verse of Ar-Rajm (stoning adulterers to death). (Sahih Bukhari)

      Now, this "hadith" belongs to Omar, not to the prophet, so it is not a prophetic saying, but a "omaric" one. Does God say "obey the companions"?

      Also, what was the prophet doing losing verses? Isn't it his job to deliver? Do you imply that he was not that honest or careful? Or is this a result of him being "illiterate" he did not know what was written and what was missing? What an insult to the prophet!! You should be ashamed of what you believe.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • G Offline
        G Offline
        Ghulam_Rasool
        wrote on last edited by
        #92

        Now, this "hadith" belongs to Omar, not to the prophet, so it is not a prophetic saying, but a "omaric" one. Does God say "obey the companions"?

        Also, what was the prophet doing losing verses? Isn't it his job to deliver? Do you imply that he was not that honest or careful? Or is this a result of him being "illiterate" he did not know what was written and what was missing? What an insult to the prophet!! You should be ashamed of what you believe.

        Allah is the one who causes verses to be forgotten, which are part of His own plan.

        None of Our revelations do We abrogate or cause to be forgotten, but We substitute something better or similar Knowest thou not that Allah Hath power over all things? (2106)

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • S Offline
          S Offline
          Samia
          wrote on last edited by
          #93

          Allah is the one who causes verses to be forgotten, which are part of His own plan.

          None of Our revelations do We abrogate or cause to be forgotten, but We substitute something better or similar Knowest thou not that Allah Hath power over all things? (2106)

          Just great! God causes the verse to be forgotten, but Omar remembers it brickwall
          According to this hadith, it seems that neither the prophet nor his lord are doing a good job! Omar beat them both and Bukhari beat the hell out of muslims.

          And what, in your opinion, was the better or similar substitution, or any substitution of this alleged lost-and-found verse?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • G Offline
            G Offline
            Ghulam_Rasool
            wrote on last edited by
            #94

            Just great! God causes the verse to be forgotten, but Omar remembers it

            Allah caused the WORDING of the verse to be forgotten. Even Hazrat Omar (ra) did not remember the wording of the ayatur rajm. However, he was among many of the sahaba who were witnesses to the tanzil of Holy Quran, and he knew for a fact that a verse commanding stoning to death for adultery had indeed been revealed in the Holy Quran, though he did not remember the wording of the verse (which is why it isnt found in the Holy Quran), because the wording was caused to be forgotten/abrogated by Allah (though the ruling of the verse still applies).

            So I suggest you consult the following resource to learn more about this matter
            http//qa.sunnipath.com/issue_view.asp?HD=7&ID=1856&CATE=1

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • N Offline
              N Offline
              Nurd
              wrote on last edited by
              #95

              Allah caused the WORDING of the verse to be forgotten. Even Hazrat Omar (ra) did not remember the wording of the ayatur rajm. However, he was among many of the sahaba who were witnesses to the tanzil of Holy Quran, and he knew for a fact that a verse commanding stoning to death for adultery had indeed been revealed in the Holy Quran, though he did not remember the wording of the verse (which is why it isnt found in the Holy Quran), because the wording was caused to be forgotten/abrogated by Allah (though the ruling of the verse still applies).

              So I suggest you consult the following resource to learn more about this matter
              http//qa.sunnipath.com/issue_view.asp?HD=7&ID=1856&CATE=1

              Unfortunately your link uses only hadith as proof, and since those cannot be trusted they fail to prove anything. All we can know for sure is that the Quran does not have in it any verses telling us to stone adulterers therefor it should not be done.

              Peace,

              Nurd

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Z Offline
                Z Offline
                zenje
                wrote on last edited by
                #96

                Peace Nurd and all,

                Yusha has been warned about this issue. If he is to talk about hadith he is supposed to be doing it in the appropriate section on this board.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • G Offline
                  G Offline
                  Ghulam_Rasool
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #97

                  Dear brother, I am using the HOLY QURAN to justify my arguments and beliefs. Please go through my posts and see the sheer number of verses which I have quoted.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • Z Offline
                    Z Offline
                    zenje
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #98

                    I have gone through your posts just today, the one here with the link, the other one in the Latest news section, where you quote a verse which is fine, and then you continue to validate your point with hadith.

                    Peace

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • P Offline
                      P Offline
                      phoenix1
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #99

                      Peace
                      well, I don't think the "revelatiions" in 2106 is referring to verses but doesn't it say that god does not allow revelations to be forgotten?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Y Offline
                        Y Offline
                        Yosemite
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #100

                        Allah is the one who causes verses to be forgotten, which are part of His own plan.

                        None of Our revelations do We abrogate or cause to be forgotten, but We substitute something better or similar Knowest thou not that Allah Hath power over all things? (2106)

                        Wait, because before the "do We abrogate" is written "None of Our revelations". This means it talks about revelations, books, right? Then we have "but We substitute something better or similar" This means the stoning have been subsitued to something better or similar, right?

                        Tell me if 'im wrong here please.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • S Offline
                          S Offline
                          Samia
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #101

                          Wait, because before the "do We abrogate" is written "None of Our revelations". This means it talks about revelations, books, right? Then we have "but We substitute something better or similar" This means the stoning have been subsitued to something better or similar, right?

                          Tell me if 'im wrong here please.

                          Good point, Yosemite. You do not bring a new verse in order to abrogate it by an older one! Why the trouble in the first place?

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • G Offline
                            G Offline
                            Ghulam_Rasool
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #102

                            Wait, because before the "do We abrogate" is written "None of Our revelations". This means it talks about revelations, books, right? Then we have "but We substitute something better or similar" This means the stoning have been subsitued to something better or similar, right?

                            Tell me if 'im wrong here please.

                            The wording of the verse of stoning has been caused to be forgotten (by Allah). It has been replaced by something similar, which is found in the Ahadeeth.

                            but We substitute something better or similar

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • P Offline
                              P Offline
                              phoenix1
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #103

                              Yusha, 2106 says that NONE of the revelations are abrogated or caused to be forgotten. They are NOT abrogated or caused to be forgotten by god. Unless I'm reading that verse wrong.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • S Offline
                                S Offline
                                Samia
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #104

                                The wording of the verse of stoning has been caused to be forgotten (by Allah). It has been replaced by something similar, which is found in the Ahadeeth.

                                but We substitute something better or similar

                                And the substitute is?

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • G Offline
                                  G Offline
                                  Ghulam_Rasool
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #105

                                  Unless I'm reading that verse wrong

                                  Yes, you're reading it wrong. Here is the full verse in English

                                  None of Our revelations do We abrogate or cause to be forgotten, but We substitute something better or similar Knowest thou not that Allah Hath power over all things? (2106)

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • N Offline
                                    N Offline
                                    Nurd
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #106

                                    Yes, you're reading it wrong. Here is the full verse in English

                                    None of Our revelations do We abrogate or cause to be forgotten, but We substitute something better or similar Knowest thou not that Allah Hath power over all things? (2106)

                                    I can see the words here, but I cannot understand how it is you can interpret it the way you do.

                                    God does not cause revelations to be abrogated or forgotten. Sometimes though we will substitute something better.

                                    So your interpretation that god caused a verse to be forgotten so that it could be substituted by hadith goes completely against the words you are quoting from the Quran.

                                    Peace,

                                    Nurd

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • G Offline
                                      G Offline
                                      Ghulam_Rasool
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #107

                                      This is why people should have some knowledge of Arabic when understanding the Holy Quran. If you interpret it strictly from English rendering you are bound to have misconceptions. So let me provide you with alternative English translations of the same verse

                                      Such of Our revelations as We abrogate or cause to be forgotten, we bring (in place) one better or the like thereof. Knowest thou not that Allah is Able to do all things? (2106 PICKTALL)

                                      Any message which We annul or consign to oblivion We replace with a better or a similar one. Dost thou not know that God has the power to will anything? (2106 ASAD)

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • P Offline
                                        P Offline
                                        phoenix1
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #108

                                        Peace,
                                        I think this verse is not talking about books. It's talking about signs of this universe. When a certain knowledge is lost, a new one takes it's place.
                                        The truth always remains the same, and it always survives (as part of this creation). The truth can't be abrogated or taken away, obviously.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • S Offline
                                          S Offline
                                          Samia
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #109

                                          This is why people should have some knowledge of Arabic when understanding the Holy Quran.

                                          You are absolutely right. If they know Arabic, they will know that "nasakha" means to copy, not to abrogate.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users