Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. General Issues / Questions
  4. Isa ibn Maryam

Isa ibn Maryam

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Issues / Questions
99 Posts 15 Posters 3.2k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Ahmad_Bilal
    wrote on last edited by
    #85

    Peace Rami,

    You can't compare the mythical stories of ancient societies to the Hebrew history recorded in the Torah. First of all, the acts were witnessed by THOUSANDS of people, and they were confirmed by all the people of the time, even generations later. Therefore, if one person came up claiming that God spoke to thousands of people, which the Torah alleges, others would say, "Why didn't my parents tell me anything about this?" If the acts were so miraculous, then people would speak upon them for generations, telling their children and their children's children; in other words, the stories wouldn't be easily forgotten. This is one of the main reasons why the oral Torah (i.e. the Mischna) was preserved for so long, even before it was written down in the second century. Those stories, including the ones that are NOT mentioned anywhere in the Hebrew Bible, were preserved for thousands of years, word for word, being exact among hundreds of thousands of people DOWN TO THE LETTER. This is not coincidental, it's because these events actually happened, and the stories were passed down WORD FOR WORD through the generations of Jews and Hebrews...

    Later on, the Qur'aan confirmed these Hebrew stories, which you call "myths"...

    It pretty much boils down to original composition and structure, especially in relation to religion. Islaam is based on the foundations of Judaism, which is why the Qur'aan confirms the Torah. Nazarenism is also based on the traditions of ancient Judaism, which is why the Enjeel confirms the Torah, and this is also true in light of the fact that Jesus was a Jew and he taught Judaism and adherence to the Torah... So, based on this concept, Judaism is the structural foundation of all of the Abrahamic faiths. If Judaism is wrong, then Islaam and Nazarenism are also wrong; there's no denying this. If the Torah is wrong, then both the Qur'aan and the Enjeel are also wrong, since both of them claim to verify the Torah. If the Jewish prophets spoke falsely, then Muhammad was a false prophet for confirming their teachings... Considering this, do you really want to debate the authenticity of Torah and Judaism? How can the Qur'aan and Islaam stand without these?

    Peace,

    Ahmad

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Y Offline
      Y Offline
      YuhannaTheMad
      wrote on last edited by
      #86

      ...If the acts were so miraculous, then people would speak upon them for generations, telling their children and their children's children; in other words, the stories wouldn't be easily forgotten. This is one of the main reasons why the oral Torah (i.e. the Mischna) was preserved for so long, even before it was written down in the second century. Those stories, including the ones that are NOT mentioned anywhere in the Hebrew Bible, were preserved for thousands of years, word for word, being exact among hundreds of thousands of people DOWN TO THE LETTER. This is not coincidental, it's because these events actually happened, and the stories were passed down WORD FOR WORD through the generations of Jews and Hebrews...

      Hinduism is older than Judaism with lots of myths preserved too.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • R Offline
        R Offline
        Rami
        wrote on last edited by
        #87

        All you have to do to refute the old testament is to look at a very similar text like the Ugaritic texts.

        http//www.youtube.com/watch?v=urZatcPRM8s

        Older text containing the same gods and monsters. Enjoy!

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M Offline
          M Offline
          Mazhar
          wrote on last edited by
          #88

          The scripture says that THOUSANDS of Israelites witnessed the parting of the sea.

          Where does it say so--thousands?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • A Offline
            A Offline
            Ahmad_Bilal
            wrote on last edited by
            #89

            Where does it say so--thousands?

            I just said "thousands" to be simplistic and to give the general point of the argument. Actually, according to the Hebrew records, there were many more people than this...

            Exodus 1237 mentions 600,000 walking men, besides children. In the census taken about a year after the exodus, recorded at Numbers 12, 3, 45, 46, there were 603,550 males (20 years old and older) plus 22,000 male Levites over one month old (Numbers 232, 33; 339). Keep in mind that these are only referring to the males, not the females. If you consider, hypothetically, that all the adult men, numbered at 600,000, had one wife, that would estimate to 1,200,000 total adults who were witnesses to this incident. And that's not even including the sons and daughters of these Jews, who were also witnesses to the event... To say "thousands" is a simple generalization, but it wouldn't be farfetched at all for me to say this population numbered into the "millions"...

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • R Offline
              R Offline
              rashidala
              wrote on last edited by
              #90

              Rami,

              what really can bake a person's noodle is when you tell them that the majority of myths from Sumer (creator God, savior figure, flood.. dying/rising God) are there.

              Copied by the Jews later? makes one ponder lol. One needs not even go into the fact that pre-Yahwistic Jews had a Goddess and she was axed out when the patriarchy rose to power and the rabbinical reforms. ( Gotta love history which tells the whole truth that most religions would rather forget. )

              I might say, no disrespect intended, that a later holy book is just the earlier one with a new spin to it.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • R Offline
                R Offline
                Rami
                wrote on last edited by
                #91

                Rami,

                what really can bake a person's noodle is when you tell them that the majority of myths from Sumer (creator God, savior figure, flood.. dying/rising God) are there.

                Copied by the Jews later? makes one ponder lol. One needs not even go into the fact that pre-Yahwistic Jews had a Goddess and she was axed out when the patriarchy rose to power and the rabbinical reforms. ( Gotta love history which tells the whole truth that most religions would rather forget. )

                I might say, no disrespect intended, that a later holy book is just the earlier one with a new spin to it.

                And it's apparently a very smart spin indeed. Just note the obvious differences in eschatology.

                And you are right, history and archaeology tells what religion will never tell.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • R Offline
                  R Offline
                  Rami
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #92

                  The promises in the Torah was apparently not coming true, people who followed the Law didn't live a long life and some dies without having children so the idea of reward after death was raised in Jewish thought to compensate which slipped into the Quran.

                  http//www.youtube.com/watch?v=qnaPxPPvvP0

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • A Offline
                    A Offline
                    Ahmad_Bilal
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #93

                    The promises in the Torah was apparently not coming true, people who followed the Law didn't live a long life and some dies without having children so the idea of reward after death was raised in Jewish thought to compensate which slipped into the Quran.

                    http//www.youtube.com/watch?v=qnaPxPPvvP0

                    So, you believe the Qur'aan is a fabrication, modeled after the Torah as a way to spread Muhammad's personal beliefs?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • E Offline
                      E Offline
                      No longer a Sunna-rejecter
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #94

                      So, you believe the Qur'aan is a fabrication, modeled after the Torah as a way to spread Muhammad's personal beliefs?

                      His beliefs are a mystery...

                      I am no longer a Sunna-rejecter. See 4:59-65, 62:2-4, 3:31, 4:156, 7:157 Messenger teaches and is to be followed and obeyed. Examples of revelation received which is not in the Qur'an: 3:123-126, 33:37, 2:187, 66:3, 62:9.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • R Offline
                        R Offline
                        Rami
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #95

                        His beliefs are a mystery...

                        rotfl Owwww! Are you afraid?

                        Me without the Quran is like a fish without water.

                        I am just stating the apparent. Looks may be deceiving as they say.

                        But heck Islam is still a Jewish Messianic apocalyptic sect for the destruction of the Roman influence over Jerusalem. Zoroastrian eschatology was the necessary mobilizer and motivator for this crusade. Sorry. I can't help it. yay

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • U Offline
                          U Offline
                          unknownuser
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #96

                          Me without the Quran is like a fish without water.

                          Fish without water yay

                          http//www.totalhealthbreakthroughs.com/newsletter/images/issue17/recipes.jpg

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • R Offline
                            R Offline
                            Rev_John
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #97

                            Fish without water yay

                            http//www.totalhealthbreakthroughs.com/newsletter/images/issue17/recipes.jpg

                            Mmmmmm! looks tasty! eat

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • A Offline
                              A Offline
                              Ahmad_Bilal
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #98

                              But heck Islam is still a Jewish Messianic apocalyptic sect for the destruction of the Roman influence over Jerusalem. Zoroastrian eschatology was the necessary mobilizer and motivator for this crusade.

                              Yeah, okay... )

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • M Offline
                                M Offline
                                MUNZIR_ALI
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #99

                                Mmmmmm! looks tasty! eat

                                eat eat eat eat

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                Reply
                                • Reply as topic
                                Log in to reply
                                • Oldest to Newest
                                • Newest to Oldest
                                • Most Votes


                                • Login

                                • Don't have an account? Register

                                • Login or register to search.
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Categories
                                • Recent
                                • Users