Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. General Issues / Questions
  4. Free-Minds.org is another Sect...like Suni and Shia Sects.

Free-Minds.org is another Sect...like Suni and Shia Sects.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Issues / Questions
552 Posts 35 Posters 41.9k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    belH
    wrote on last edited by
    #226

    belH peace and forgiveness

    outcome is better as consequence cannot be used for a person,

    so

    They Said
    His outcome
    who < ---- do u mean Benjamin? or the item stolen, if item stolen then what
    was found
    in
    his bag
    then that ("fa" means so/then)
    is His outcome
    in this way do
    We Punish (consequence becomes punishment for illegal action)
    the wrongdoers

    Allah knows best

    Peace,

    I agree with your translation...may this would be your ticket to God's Mercy.
    And may God forgive us for mistreating each others.
    peace

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • N Offline
      N Offline
      noble
      wrote on last edited by
      #227

      belH peace,
      don't worry bro,
      i have thick skin, and sharp teeth ... lol ;D

      D and let us not forget that Satan loves to come between the believers... >D

      Peace,

      I agree with your translation...may this would be your ticket to God's Mercy.
      And may God forgive us for mistreating each others.
      peace

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • WakasW Offline
        WakasW Offline
        Wakas
        wrote on last edited by
        #228

        peace BelH,

        Your underlining in 1267-68 is irrelevant, unless you can explain the reason why it gives weight to your view. I recommend M.Asad's notes on Joseph's story.

        Your following statement is nonsensical, unless you can clarify

        They know who would be the thieve and who they would be taking before they started looking for the stolen item)

        So, Joseph's helpers didn't mind framing someone for theft? Were they in on the plot from the start then? Were they acting? Did the whole plan rely upon the unpredictable recompense stated by the sons of Jacob? When Joseph's helpers said in 1274 "What shall be his punishment, if you (plural) are liars? (plural)" (according to you) did the plan reply upon NONE of the sons of Jacob thinking "hold on a second, why do you say/think it is only one of us?" All the sons of Jacob could have been in on the plan to steal the item.

        And I note you conveniently skip some of my points/question

        1276 "...like that did We plan for Joseph..."

        Tell us BelH, who did the plotting?

        I agree with your translation...may this would be your ticket to God's Mercy.

        Of course you do! As it is filled with errors in the Arabic! Allow me to make bold the errors

        They Said
        His outcome
        who < ---- do u mean Benjamin? or the item stolen, if item stolen then what
        was found
        in
        his bag
        then that ("fa" means so/then)
        is His outcome
        in this way do
        We Punish (consequence becomes punishment for illegal action)
        the wrongdoers

        And here is some new evidence, which causes yet more problems for your view

        wujida = 3rd person singular masculine passive perfect verb

        passive means the object (cup) has received the action expressed in the verb.

        If you need to come up with yet another rendition of 1275, feel free, but this time, remain true to the Arabic, and since you apparently know Arabic, this should be easy. Before you do, I recommend M.Asad's notes on the story, see www.quranix.net

        Looking forward to see what you come up with next. ;D

        #########

        Side note, an interesting find could be when it says "...like that we recompense the wrongdoers" implies it is the sons of Jacob who said this, and this could imply they were following what Jacob's message commanded of them, and since Jacob was a messenger/prophet i.e. they were citing God's deen, and that is why AQ mentions "Joseph would not have been able to take his brother under the King's system/deen". Comparison of two deens? The King's deen, and the God's deen?

        All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • B Offline
          B Offline
          belH
          wrote on last edited by
          #229

          Peace all,
          Wakas, let us take it one by one...First, is there was a Plot or no?

          who do you think placed the Measuring bowl in the bag of Yousuf's Brother?

          1270 So when he furnished them with their provisions, he placed the measuring bowl in the saddlebag of his brother, then a caller cried out O you in the caravan, you are thieves!

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • B Offline
            B Offline
            belH
            wrote on last edited by
            #230

            Peace all,
            Wakas, let us take it one by one...second, the passive verb

            Remember, I understand Arabic very well because it is my natural language (All my studies, except for graduate, were in Arabic).
            So, have an open mind when arguing about Arabic Language.

            Quote
            wujida = 3rd person singular masculine passive perfect verb

            passive means the object (cup) has received the action expressed in the verb.
            end quote

            was found (i.e., the cup is the object under search)

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • B Offline
              B Offline
              belH
              wrote on last edited by
              #231

              Peace all,
              As Everyone can see, Free-minds.org has translated the Quran in a way to fit its doctrine (5-3. As I showed, 12-75 is an example of which wakas tried to translate in a way to fit 5-38.
              Please compare the below word by word translation and see if it supports their translation of 5-38, as they claim

              They Said
              His outcome
              whom
              is found (cup is found)
              in
              his bag
              then it is
              His outcome
              in this way do
              We Punish (consequence becomes punishment for illegal action)
              the wrongdoers

              Here is the quote from the twisted article Wakas has been referencing too (http//misconceptions-about-islam.com/cut-off-hands-theft.htm)
              Began Quote
              It should be said however that the only working example given in The Quran of theft and its punishment is in the story of Joseph, in which option 3 is done by detaining the one guilty of theft, so that they can work to repay/compensate for the theft.

              They said, "By God, you know we did not come to cause corruption in the land, and we are no thieves!"
              He said, "What shall be the punishment, if you are not truthful?"
              They said, "The punishment is that the person who has it in his bag, he shall be the penalty for it. It is such that we punish the wicked."

              End Quote

              Finally,
              Here is a scenario that I want you to participate in

              An Island in which a group of families decided to start their Quran Alone Community that is governed by the Quran Laws.
              Every one in the Island is guaranteed to have all the life necessities (through a Job or through charities funds) ...After a while, one of the community member had a Bad habit of stealing any thing he can put his hand on...The community decided to appoint you (any one of you) as a Judge who will use the Quran only to issue judgment in the case.
              While issuing a Quranic Judgment, take into consideration the following
              The thief has been caught and released many times after he promised that he would not do again.

              Peace

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • WakasW Offline
                WakasW Offline
                Wakas
                wrote on last edited by
                #232

                peace BelH,

                Yes, let's take things one at a time. I will answer your questions, even though you disrespectfully do not answer mine

                Was there a plot?
                Yes, it was God's plan .

                Who placed the cup in the bag of Joseph's brother?
                Joseph.

                was found (i.e., the cup is the object under search)

                I agree.

                Now, onto my questions

                Have you read M.Asad's notes on this story? If so, right or wrong?
                If Joseph put the cup in his brother's bag, does this mean he planned the plot?
                If you answer yes to the above question, does that mean his plan was reliant upon his helpers noticing the cup was gone, AND the unpredictable response of the sons of Jacob AND them not noticing the illogical switch in plural to singular to plural in the helper's statements?
                According to 1276 who planned the plot?
                Can you cite a Classical Arabic dictionary stating "jazao" means "punishment"?
                If "jazaohu" means "his outcome" (according to you) in 1274, then please explain the illogical use of plural, then singular, then plural by the helpers?

                And thanks for providing yet another rendition of 1275 but there is a mistake in the grammar (highlighted in bold), not that I agree with your translation

                They Said
                His outcome
                whom
                is found (cup is found)
                in
                his bag
                then it is
                His outcome
                in this way do
                We Punish (consequence becomes punishment for illegal action)
                the wrongdoers

                huwa = 3rd person singular masculine personal pronoun, meaning "he".
                As opposed to the "hu" in "jazaohu" which is a possessive pronoun.

                So BelH, please try yet another rendition, since you know Arabic and all. And whilst your at it, confirm to us all how your rendition is exactly the way it would be said in Arabic if it meant what you think it means.

                Remember, I understand Arabic very well because it is my natural language (All my studies, except for graduate, were in Arabic).
                So, have an open mind when arguing about Arabic Language.

                Oh I have an open mind, dont worry. My mind is so open that I think knowing Arabic is no match for the power of logic/reasoning.

                All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • J Offline
                  J Offline
                  Jack
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #233

                  Peace all,
                  Wakas, let us take it one by one...First, is there was a Plot or no?

                  who do you think placed the Measuring bowl in the bag of Yousuf's Brother?

                  1270 So when he furnished them with their provisions, he placed the measuring bowl in the saddlebag of his brother, then a caller cried out O you in the caravan, you are thieves!

                  It was God's plan, Joseph carried it out.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • A Offline
                    A Offline
                    afridi220
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #234

                    Peace all,
                    As Everyone can see, Free-minds.org has translated the Quran in a way to fit its doctrine (5-3. As I showed, 12-75 is an example of which wakas tried to translate in a way to fit 5-38.
                    Please compare the below word by word translation and see if it supports their translation of 5-38, as they claim

                    They Said
                    His outcome
                    whom
                    is found (cup is found)
                    in
                    his bag
                    then it is
                    His outcome
                    in this way do
                    We Punish (consequence becomes punishment for illegal action)
                    the wrongdoers

                    Here is the quote from the twisted article Wakas has been referencing too (http//misconceptions-about-islam.com/cut-off-hands-theft.htm)
                    Began Quote
                    It should be said however that the only working example given in The Quran of theft and its punishment is in the story of Joseph, in which option 3 is done by detaining the one guilty of theft, so that they can work to repay/compensate for the theft.

                    They said, "By God, you know we did not come to cause corruption in the land, and we are no thieves!"
                    He said, "What shall be the punishment, if you are not truthful?"
                    They said, "The punishment is that the person who has it in his bag, he shall be the penalty for it. It is such that we punish the wicked."

                    End Quote

                    Finally,
                    Here is a scenario that I want you to participate in

                    An Island in which a group of families decided to start their Quran Alone Community that is governed by the Quran Laws.
                    Every one in the Island is guaranteed to have all the life necessities (through a Job or through charities funds) ...After a while, one of the community member had a Bad habit of stealing any thing he can put his hand on...The community decided to appoint you (any one of you) as a Judge who will use the Quran only to issue judgment in the case.
                    While issuing a Quranic Judgment, take into consideration the following
                    The thief has been caught and released many times after he promised that he would not do again.

                    Peace

                    Am i learning from a wrong teacher confused

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • B Offline
                      B Offline
                      belH
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #235

                      Have you read M.Asad's notes on this story? If so, right or wrong?

                      No...but I will be glad to comment if you quote the part you want me to comment on.

                      If Joseph put the cup in his brother's bag, does this mean he planned the plot?

                      As Jack said, Yousuf carried the planned plot. (every thing that happen in our life depends on God's well for it to happen or not)

                      If you answer yes to the above question, does that mean his plan was reliant upon his helpers noticing the cup was gone, AND the unpredictable response of the sons of Jacob AND them not noticing the illogical switch in plural to singular to plural in the helper's statements?

                      I'm having a problem to understand the point...but, The helpers only follow their master (yousuf) orders. The helper were told by Yousuf to catch one and not all as a group, simply because Yousuf wanted His brother only. But if He wanted to arrest all, he would have ordered them to do so, then the PLURAL would have stayed PLURAL.

                      If "jazaohu" means "his outcome" (according to you) in 1274, then please explain the illogical use of plural, then singular, then plural by the helpers?

                      Answered above

                      They Said
                      His outcome
                      whom
                      is found (cup is found)
                      in
                      his bag
                      then it is
                      His outcome
                      in this way do
                      We Punish (consequence becomes punishment for illegal action)
                      the wrongdoers

                      huwa = 3rd person singular masculine personal pronoun, meaning "he".
                      As opposed to the "hu" in "jazaohu" which is a possessive pronoun.

                      Huwa= 3rd thing masculine Huwa is Referring TO The Outcome....thus, I used "It"

                      So BelH, please try yet another rendition, since you know Arabic and all. And whilst your at it, confirm to us all how your rendition is exactly the way it would be said in Arabic if it meant what you think it means.

                      can you explain further.

                      And I agree with you, knowing Arabic is not enough to understand the Quran...

                      Can you be the judge on this case

                      An Island in which a group of families decided to start their Quran Alone Community that is governed by the Quran Laws.
                      Every one in the Island is guaranteed to have all the life necessities (through a Job or through charities funds) ...After a while, one of the community member had a Bad habit of stealing any thing he can put his hand on...The community decided to appoint you (any one of you) as a Judge who will use the Quran only to issue judgment in the case.
                      While issuing a Quranic Judgment, take into consideration the following
                      The thief has been caught and released many times after he promised that he would not do again.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • N Offline
                        N Offline
                        noble
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #236

                        Peace belH, Wakas,
                        you are still arguing on this subject, you are very patient, i command you )
                        for me it is not joseph story that convince me that amputating hand is not what the ayah means,
                        only the way the sentence is written, the logic of the way we can deal with such offenses, and the fact that
                        Allah does not command stupid things, the Most Wise.
                        now for the reason Joseph story cannot be taken as proof anyway, is because nothing was forbidden to bani israeel but
                        what bani israeel forbade themselves before revelation of Torah to Moses...
                        for your hypothetical example of desert island and repeat offender, as a judge, i will enforce forced labour under guard or in confinement away from the community with people like him, or even putting to death...
                        i am sorry, taking prisoners or mutilating for me is not islamic and is an abomination, and if they have been mentioned in the Quran, is only to show the powerful disbelievers that this is how they should be punished because this is how they punish their weak people and slaves before (but instead have no law for themselves and a law for their slaves)...
                        How can you accept that a Deen that encourage people to free slaves, will then encourage mutilation and taking prisoners?
                        even killing is last resort, and it has to be with consultation with victims who can accept compensation and forgive...
                        In Islam, there should not be prisons, no torture, no maiming, no mutilation, and no encouragement to slavery, in fact the only reason slavery was tolerated still is because it was so prevalent at the time of the Prophet, but eventually, the Quran showed that the reward to free slaves is very high with Allah...
                        the only corporal punishment for the believers in the Quran is Zina, it is clearly defined, clearly explained, and in a Surah that is very powerful...
                        take it or leave it, but this is my strong belief...
                        alfitnatu ashaddu minalkatli

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • S Offline
                          S Offline
                          Samia
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #237

                          I do not think the "consequence" is a good translation for . It's best translated as "recompense".
                          My understanding is
                          1274
                          (the pronoun in refers to the cup the recompense for the cup)
                          They said what's its recompense if you were liars?1274

                          They said its recompense, whoever it's found in his bag is its recompense. 1275

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • B Offline
                            B Offline
                            belH
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #238

                            for your hypothetical example of desert island and repeat offender, as a judge, i will enforce forced labour under guard or in confinement away from the community with people like him, or even putting to death...
                            i am sorry, taking prisoners or mutilating for me is not islamic and is an abomination, and if they have been mentioned in the Quran, is only to show the powerful disbelievers that this is how they should be punished because this is how they punish their weak people and slaves before (but instead have no law for themselves and a law for their slaves)...
                            How can you accept that a Deen that encourage people to free slaves, will then encourage mutilation and taking prisoners?
                            even killing is last resort, and it has to be with consultation with victims who can accept compensation and forgive...

                            Peace Nabster,

                            Please note that to be the Judge in this community, You MUST use the Quran...It is a Precondition, otherwise, you cannot be the Judge.

                            Please, you need to quote the Verses that Supports your Judgment (i.e., Killing the thief)

                            Peace

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • B Offline
                              B Offline
                              belH
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #239

                              I do not think the "consequence" is a good translation for . It's best translated as "recompense".
                              My understanding is
                              1274
                              (the pronoun in refers to the cup the recompense for the cup)
                              They said what's its recompense if you were liars?1274

                              They said its recompense, whoever it's found in his bag is its recompense. 1275

                              Do you mean this meaning
                              to give something to by way of compensation (as for a service rendered or damage incurred) b to pay for
                              2 to return in kind requite
                              .

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • S Offline
                                S Offline
                                Samia
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #240

                                Do you mean this meaning
                                to give something to by way of compensation (as for a service rendered or damage incurred)

                                Almost. I referred to the noun, not the verb

                                More precisely
                                "Payment given to someone because of slight problems or because of the loss of or damage to their property

                                e.g I received ?500 from the local council in recompense for the damage to my garden".

                                (Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary)

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • B Offline
                                  B Offline
                                  belH
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #241

                                  I do not think the "consequence" is a good translation for . It's best translated as "recompense".

                                  Samia,
                                  This how I translate 5-38...Do you think I made a mistake in my translation?

                                  538

                                  And the Thief (Male)
                                  and the Thief (Female)
                                  Cut
                                  Their Hands
                                  as an Outcome
                                  for what
                                  they earn
                                  as a Harsh Punishment
                                  from
                                  Allah
                                  and Allah
                                  Nobel
                                  Wise

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • B Offline
                                    B Offline
                                    belH
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #242

                                    Almost. I referred to the noun, not the verb

                                    More precisely
                                    "Payment given to someone because of slight problems or because of the loss of or damage to their property

                                    e.g I received ?500 from the local council in recompense for the damage to my garden".

                                    (Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary)

                                    But you are ignoring the Fact that Can be Taking Money, instead of giving, because of a damage that is caused by the person Whom you are taking the money from...Thus, Outcome Fits better because it can be used both way (as a reward or Punishment)

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • S Offline
                                      S Offline
                                      Samia
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #243

                                      But you are ignoring the Fact that Can be Taking Money, instead of giving, because of a damage that is caused by the person Whom you are taking the money from...Thus, Outcome Fits better because it can be used both way (as a reward or Punishment)

                                      They are taking the brother...as a recompense for the lost cup
                                      "The recompense for it; whomever the cup is in his bag is the recompense for it" 1275.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • B Offline
                                        B Offline
                                        belH
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #244

                                        They are taking the brother...as a recompense for the lost cup
                                        "The recompense for it; whomever the cup is in his bag is the recompense for it" 1275.

                                        Samia, has one meaning that can Fit in all the Quran, That is the Outcome. However, Recompense can not fit in all the verses (unless in cases when there is a reward, but will never when there is punishment)...Thus, Outcome is the Right word.

                                        Now, if the punishment were to take the thief, then, what are they were going to do with him?

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • S Offline
                                          S Offline
                                          Samia
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #245

                                          Samia,
                                          This how I translate 5-38...Do you think I made a mistake in my translation?

                                          538

                                          And the Thief (Male)
                                          and the Thief (Female)
                                          Cut
                                          Their Hands
                                          as a Recompense/Outcome (Outcome fits the meaning better)
                                          for what
                                          they earn
                                          as a Harsh Punishment
                                          from
                                          Allah
                                          and Allah
                                          Nobel
                                          Wise

                                          I do not see a problem with recompense here. Changing their behaviour by ending the causes of their stealing habit (cut their hands, as we say in cut their tongue make them stop telling false things) is a replacement for the stealing habit. I see it as something to replace anther.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users