Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. General Issues / Questions
  4. Free-Minds.org is another Sect...like Suni and Shia Sects.

Free-Minds.org is another Sect...like Suni and Shia Sects.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Issues / Questions
552 Posts 35 Posters 40.8k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • E Offline
    E Offline
    No longer a Sunna-rejecter
    wrote on last edited by
    #434

    I would like to not discuss the Thief punishment issue further because it is off topic.

    Or maybe because your arguement was beaten and you cannot counter others' arguements.

    My topic is very clear, which is If free-minds.org adheres to doctrine that represents a unique understanding of Quran that is different from others, then Free-minds.org is a Sect and not a Free-Minds Forum.

    The above is totally pathetic. Who are the "others" in your sentence "...difference from others" - you? Sunnis? Shias?
    Please read 6116.

    Also, what do you mean with "free-minds.org is a sect". We are all members of this forum/site, and have different views from one another - how can we form/be a sect then?

    I am no longer a Sunna-rejecter. See 4:59-65, 62:2-4, 3:31, 4:156, 7:157 Messenger teaches and is to be followed and obeyed. Examples of revelation received which is not in the Qur'an: 3:123-126, 33:37, 2:187, 66:3, 62:9.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • U Offline
      U Offline
      unknownuser
      wrote on last edited by
      #435

      Also, what do you mean with "free-minds.org is a sect". We are all members of this forum/site, and have different views from one another - how can we form/be a sect then?

      It is a sect because it doesn't promote any other existing sect so it must be a different sect itself. you people do not accept its a sect because you are jealous of my insightful views.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • B Offline
        B Offline
        belH
        wrote on last edited by
        #436

        Or maybe because your arguement was beaten and you cannot counter others' arguements.

        To be beaten is what I was Hoping for so I can end this and change my understanding as I did with many other issues.

        We can drag this forever if you wish...whoever, I need you to post new findings that can support your understanding.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • A Offline
          A Offline
          ayman
          wrote on last edited by
          #437

          Peace Belh,

          your opinion is just a human opinion, but this is The Creator of Heaven and Earth's Opinion
          544 We have sent down the Torah, in it is a guidance and a light; the prophets who have submitted judged with it for those who are Jewish, and the Devotees, and the Priests, for what they were entrusted of the Book of God, and they were witness over. So do not be concerned with the people but be concerned with Me; and do not purchase with My revelations a cheap price. And whoever does not judge with what God has sent down, then these are the rejecters.
          544

          It is not my opinion. It is an indisputable reality that the King James Bible or whatever Bible or parts of it you have in your hands is not the Torah. There is no agreement even amongst the Jews themselves about what the Torah is and yet you come here and arrogantly claim to have the original Torah. Unless you can specifically show the original Torah and prove that it is the original, then your opinion that the Bible or whatever parts of it is the Torah doesn't even reach the level of an educated human opinion. All your opinions on this matter are nothing but ignorance and the way you present them as the god's opinion and not your own further shows how ignorance, arrogance and lies feed off one another in the human imagination until the person has deluded themselves.

          Peace,

          Ayman

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • LaythL Offline
            LaythL Offline
            Layth
            wrote on last edited by
            #438

            Salam,

            Sorry, but I never heard this before;

            So why do you then keep arguing?

            the Verb meaning stays the same and the action would change based on the proceeding words (e.g., cut the Hand, cut the Road, Cut the Job, Cut the Air supply)...The verb in 5-33 and 5-38 iare constructed as follow

            = + + +
            = +

            Both words has the Root Word

            In 5-33 it means "Shall Cut"
            In 5-38 it means "You Shall Cut"

            I will give you an example to start you on your way...I expect that you look-up the rest rather than wasting everyones time by arguing in circles when so many answers and so much information has already been given.

            Qata alshajara = he cut/severed the tree
            Qatta alshajara = he cut-up the tree

            The 1st example is open for a choice of meaning depending on context.
            The 2nd example is not open for a choice of meaning and can only be a phsyical cutting/cutting-up.

            Such is the difference between 533 and 538.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • B Offline
              B Offline
              belH
              wrote on last edited by
              #439

              Peace Belh,

              It is not my opinion. It is an indisputable reality that the King James Bible or whatever Bible or parts of it you have in your hands is not the Torah. There is no agreement even amongst the Jews themselves about what the Torah is and yet you come here and arrogantly claim to have the original Torah. Unless you can specifically show the original Torah and prove that it is the original, then your opinion that the Bible or whatever parts of it is the Torah doesn't even reach the level of an educated human opinion. All your opinions on this matter are nothing but ignorance and the way you present them as the god's opinion and not your own further shows how ignorance, arrogance and lies feed off one another in the human imagination until the person has deluded themselves.

              Peace,

              Ayman

              I challenge you and anyone in this forum to provide a Single Verse that says The Torah and Injeel are corrupted or will be...

              1856 And We do not send the messengers except as bearers of good news and warners. But those who reject will argue using falsehood to overshadow the truth with it. And they took My revelations and what they have been warned by for mockery!
              1856

              It is indisputable fact, in Torah and Injeel, that Abraham had two wives...If you want to disbelieve, then it is your choice.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • A Offline
                A Offline
                Ahmad_Bilal
                wrote on last edited by
                #440

                It is indisputable fact, in Torah and Injeel, that Abraham had two wives...

                Where does the Injiyl say that Ibrahiym had two wives?

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • E Offline
                  E Offline
                  No longer a Sunna-rejecter
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #441

                  Belal,

                  I would like to add one more thing to the theif issue Let's say a thief stole 100,000 dollars and from you and your laptop and then the thief spends the money and uses the laptop. Would you rather have his hands butchered or have your belongings back/compensation?

                  I am no longer a Sunna-rejecter. See 4:59-65, 62:2-4, 3:31, 4:156, 7:157 Messenger teaches and is to be followed and obeyed. Examples of revelation received which is not in the Qur'an: 3:123-126, 33:37, 2:187, 66:3, 62:9.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • B Offline
                    B Offline
                    belH
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #442

                    Peace all,

                    Qata alshajara = he cut/severed the tree
                    Qatta alshajara = he cut-up the tree

                    Can you show me an example from Quran where "the Verb + proceeding word" change in meaning based on the Context.

                    And as I told you and everyone who wants to use 12-75 as punishment for Thief, you are promoting "Slavery", because that was the Punishment in 12-75.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • H Offline
                      H Offline
                      hope4
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #443

                      I challenge you and anyone in this forum to provide a Single Verse that says The Torah and Injeel are corrupted or will be...

                      1856 And We do not send the messengers except as bearers of good news and warners. But those who reject will argue using falsehood to overshadow the truth with it. And they took My revelations and what they have been warned by for mockery!
                      1856

                      It is indisputable fact, in Torah and Injeel, that Abraham had two wives...If you want to disbelieve, then it is your choice.

                      5677 It is an honorable Reading.
                      5678 In a protected Book.

                      Does this mean all the books or just Quran?

                      Peace

                      Hope

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • B Offline
                        B Offline
                        belH
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #444

                        Belal,

                        I would like to add one more thing to the theif issue Let's say a thief stole 100,000 dollars and from you and your laptop and then the thief spends the money and uses the laptop. Would you rather have his hands butchered or have your belongings back/compensation?

                        This discussion is not about My Choice or yours.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • B Offline
                          B Offline
                          belH
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #445

                          5677 It is an honorable Reading.
                          5678 In a protected Book.

                          Does this mean all the books or just Quran?

                          Peace

                          Hope

                          Why God would protect Quran and abandon the Torah and Injeel? Why God orderes us to believe in Books that had the potential to be Corrupted? If God Knew that the Torah and Injeel will be Corrupted, why He did not worn us in the Quran, and instead, He Told Us to believe in?

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • N Offline
                            N Offline
                            noble
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #446

                            peace guys, gals,
                            as i feared belH has completely lost it ...

                            Why God would protect Quran and abandon the Torah and Injeel? Why God orderes us to believe in Books that had the potential to be Corrupted? If God Knew that the Torah and Injeel will be Corrupted, why He did not worn us in the Quran, and instead, He Told Us to believe in?

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • B Offline
                              B Offline
                              belH
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #447

                              Qata alshajara = he cut/severed the tree
                              Qatta alshajara = he cut-up the tree

                              The 1st example is open for a choice of meaning depending on context.
                              The 2nd example is not open for a choice of meaning and can only be a phsyical cutting/cutting-up.

                              Such is the difference between 533 and 538.

                              Peace all,

                              This is an understanding that came in mind about the use of the Verb

                              When I ask to butcher to "E-Qata 2 pound of Meat", He would Cut one 2 Lb piece from the whole Cow (The verb action is one action)...Then the Butcher would ask me by saying "Do you want to "Te-Qatta the piece of Meat" into small pieces (the Verb action would be repeated).

                              Thus, 5-33 refers to repeating the Action of Cutting in order to cut Legs and Hands, and 5-38 refers to Cut one thing (the Hand/s).

                              The above understanding just came in my mind--It could be right or wrong.
                              Peace

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • E Offline
                                E Offline
                                No longer a Sunna-rejecter
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #448

                                This discussion is not about My Choice or yours.

                                I see... In other words, cutting from the resources is the better option

                                I am no longer a Sunna-rejecter. See 4:59-65, 62:2-4, 3:31, 4:156, 7:157 Messenger teaches and is to be followed and obeyed. Examples of revelation received which is not in the Qur'an: 3:123-126, 33:37, 2:187, 66:3, 62:9.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • B Offline
                                  B Offline
                                  belH
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #449

                                  peace guys, gals,
                                  as i feared belH has completely lost it ...

                                  can you help me to find my way by explaining where I made a mistake?

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • H Offline
                                    H Offline
                                    hope4
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #450

                                    Why God would protect Quran and abandon the Torah and Injeel? Why God orderes us to believe in Books that had the potential to be Corrupted? If God Knew that the Torah and Injeel will be Corrupted, why He did not worn us in the Quran, and instead, He Told Us to believe in?

                                    Peace belH

                                    A good question. But consider this also, why the need for Injeel and Quran if Torah was enough? Also consider this verses

                                    277 Do they not know that God knows what they conceal and what
                                    they declare?
                                    278 And among them are Gentiles who do not know the Book except
                                    by hearsay, and they only conjecture.
                                    279 So woe to those who write the Book with their hands then say
                                    ?This is from God,? so that they can purchase with it a cheap
                                    price! Woe to them for what their hands have written and woe to
                                    them for what they gained.

                                    What is it talking about? Who is concealing? Who are the Gentiles who only know of the book through hearsay and only conjecture? Also who is God talking about in 279?

                                    Peace

                                    Hope

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • B Offline
                                      B Offline
                                      belH
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #451

                                      But consider this also, why the need for Injeel and Quran if Torah was enough?

                                      God revealed the Injeel to expose the Wrong teachings of the Jews who wrote other books beside the Torah (2-79) to mislead and corrupt the Torah Teachings, and to change some of the Torah Laws.
                                      However, He also taught Jesus the True meanings of the Torah.
                                      God Revealed the Quran to expose the Wrong Teachings of the Jews and the Christians who wrote other books beside the Torah and Injeel (2-79) to mislead and corrupt the True teachings, and change some of the laws of the Torah and Injeel. However, God ordered the Prophet Mohamed to learn and believe in the Torah and Injeel.

                                      Also consider this verses

                                      277 Do they not know that God knows what they conceal and what
                                      they declare?
                                      278 And among them are Gentiles who do not know the Book except
                                      by hearsay, and they only conjecture.
                                      279 So woe to those who write the Book with their hands then say
                                      ?This is from God,? so that they can purchase with it a cheap
                                      price! Woe to them for what their hands have written and woe to
                                      them for what they gained.

                                      What is it talking about? Who is concealing? Who are the Gentiles who only know of the book through hearsay and only conjecture? Also who is God talking about in 279?

                                      It is talking about everyone who write religion Books to mislead people from the True Religion Books (Quran, Torah, and Injeel). Example, The Hadith Book, and the Talmud.

                                      The Religious Lords (e.g., Imams, ulamas and Priests) are the ones who are concealing the True Teachings of the True Books.

                                      the Gentiles are the ones who do not know the True teachings of the Books, and they follow their trusted Religious Leaders' Teachings.

                                      Please see above for your question about 2-79.
                                      Peace

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • B Offline
                                        B Offline
                                        belH
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #452

                                        I see... In other words, cutting from the resources is the better option

                                        Peace,

                                        When someone steals from you and he gets caught, does the court gives you (the victim) the option to choose what would be the Punishment of the Thief (Civil Case Progressive 1993 Vs the Thief) ; or the Case becomes The Society Vs The Thief (criminal Case).
                                        The Quran laws is the same as today's Society Laws...The Laws the Prophet had to use to govern his society...There are some Civil Laws (Humans Vs Criminal) and some other are Criminal Laws (God Vs the Criminal).

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • H Offline
                                          H Offline
                                          hope4
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #453

                                          God revealed the Injeel to expose the Wrong teachings of the Jews who wrote other books beside the Torah (2-79) to mislead and corrupt the Torah Teachings, and to change some of the Torah Laws.
                                          However, He also taught Jesus the True meanings of the Torah.
                                          God Revealed the Quran to expose the Wrong Teachings of the Jews and the Christians who wrote other books beside the Torah and Injeel (2-79) to mislead and corrupt the True teachings, and change some of the laws of the Torah and Injeel. However, God ordered the Prophet Mohamed to learn and believe in the Torah and Injeel.

                                          It is talking about everyone who write religion Books to mislead people from the True Religion Books (Quran, Torah, and Injeel). Example, The Hadith Book, and the Talmud.

                                          The Religious Lords (e.g., Imams, ulamas and Priests) are the ones who are concealing the True Teachings of the True Books.

                                          the Gentiles are the ones who do not know the True teachings of the Books, and they follow their trusted Religious Leaders' Teachings.

                                          Please see above for your question about 2-79.
                                          Peace

                                          Peace belH

                                          Thank you for your explenation. I have one more question and hope I am not troubling you or taking up too much of your time and thank you for your patients. If the Injeel was delivered to teach the true Torah and then the Quran to expose the prevous books fallacies then do we have the true Injeel and Torah in circulation today? Or is the Injeel and Torah in todays circulation been corrupted?

                                          Peace

                                          Hope

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users