Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. Please help translating 2:125- Thanks

Please help translating 2:125- Thanks

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
42 Posts 8 Posters 442 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    san
    wrote on last edited by
    #13

    Peace all,

    But people from outside world are asked to visit that place if they have resources to go there.

    Outside world.

    Resources.

    Resources from outside world are being brought to inside world. Inside world gain resources. Outside world gain spiritual contentment. Stay this way--long live the kingdom on which Mecca stand.

    919

    Peace

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M Offline
      M Offline
      Mazhar
      wrote on last edited by
      #14

      Peace all,

      Outside world.

      Resources.

      Resources from outside world are being brought to inside world. Inside world gain resources. Outside world gain spiritual contentment. Stay this way--long live the kingdom on which Mecca stand.

      919

      Peace

      It is otherway round. "Resources" have flown from "inside world" to outside world.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • S Offline
        S Offline
        san
        wrote on last edited by
        #15

        It is otherway round. "Resources" have flown from "inside world" to outside world.

        'long live "inside world" -- the source of "Resources" to outside world.'

        Peace

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • U Offline
          U Offline
          unknownuser
          wrote on last edited by
          #16

          Peace all,

          Outside world.

          Resources.

          Resources from outside world are being brought to inside world. Inside world gain resources. Outside world gain spiritual contentment. Stay this way--long live the kingdom on which Mecca stand.

          919

          Peace

          I think it should have been something likethough.

          (2125)And (remember) when we made The system of vying with one another for firmness of mankind and peace/safety and take from standing (of) Abraham the counselor. And we covenanted with Abraham and Ishmael that they purify/make righteous my system for those wanting to do good and who devote themselves and those who humble the submitting.

          Do you still believe in Mecca after all that you have read here at free-minds?

          I am glad i stopped , thank God.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • S Offline
            S Offline
            san
            wrote on last edited by
            #17

            @simple,

            I have presented my view before

            ... i just want to share my current view on how to see this natural, physically-boundless relationship and interaction between humanity, under the invitation of the Nurturer of all Natures -- which can be performed by any family or household, at any time and at any home place and in any community on this earth...

            You might want to ask those who still believe in Mecca, the city. Not me. P

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • H Offline
              H Offline
              herbman
              wrote on last edited by
              #18

              As far as I'm aware "mu" means "one who... (whatever it is attached to)", e.g. muslim, mumin, mushrik.

              So, in this case the literal rendering of "musallan" = "one who turns/goes towards in a close/positive manner" or more succinctly "one who bonds".

              Salam, Peace Wakas, all,

              1- mussalan in the verse refer to makan and not to ibrahim, please correct if I am wrong.
              2- mu- prefix can be more general not only for persons e.g. mubarak (where baraka is on, can be a day, a year, a place)
              3- maqam ibrahima mussalan could mean Ibrahim's position/faith is a where the bond/link is on--> which means The key to perform the bond/link is to get the same position as Ibrahim about Monotheism/association.

              Peace

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S Offline
                S Offline
                san
                wrote on last edited by
                #19

                Peace Herbman and everyone,

                Salam, Peace Wakas, all,

                1- mussalan in the verse refer to makan and not to ibrahim, please correct if I am wrong.
                2- mu- prefix can be more general not only for persons e.g. mubarak (where baraka is on, can be a day, a year, a place)
                3- maqam ibrahima mussalan could mean Ibrahim's position/faith is a where the bond/link is on--> which means The key to perform the bond/link is to get the same position as Ibrahim about Monotheism/association.

                Peace

                1. makan? you mean maqam? how/why?
                2. for the example of "mubarak"

                692 kitaabun as mubarakun
                6155 kitaabun as mubarakun
                1931 (Iysa 'ibn Maryam) as mubarakan 2150 d.ikrun (a reminder) as mubarakun 2329 munzalan (place to descend sth?) as mubarakan 2435 s.ajaratin (tree) as mubarakatin 2830 Albuqati (a water source?) as Almubarakati
                449 laylatin (night) as mubarakatin
                509 maa`an (water) from the sky as mubarakan

                mu- could well be the performer--i.e, a subject who performs something. In case of mubarak-, the performer of barakah -- e.g., if you take "barakah" as "blessing", then "mubarak-" is the performer/deliverer of blessing.

                note in the example above, the 'suffix' is always in harmony with the subject

                Now let's get to the trickier verse

                396 Inna awwala baytin wudia li-lnaAsi la-llad.iy bi-bakkata mubaArakAn wa hudAn li-lalamiyn

                mubarakan wahudan ... yet no other subject with -an in the verse. Does mubarakan refer to another subject not in the verse? Or does mubarakan refer to no one in particular? Thus the "awwal" in the verse means the "beginning" of a bayt (i.e., not the First House)?

                Because i have another view to read this verse as

                Indeed -- beginning of -- a bayt (home/house/family) -- appointed/brought forth/delivered/laid-in-place -- for mankind -- (em) is that which -- with hardship/denial/pressure/competition -- of a mubarak (one with blessing, or one striving/exerting/laboring, firmly/constantly/continuously) -- and a guidance -- for the worlds.

                In 367 Ibrahim is "Hanifan musliman"; in 1931 `Iysa is "mubarakan"; in 2125, min maqaAmi IbraAhiyma muSallan

                Considering the examples above, now i begin to think that muSallan is indeed Ibrahim himself and not the maqam. However, i very much agree that the key to understand Salla/Salaat is indeed in the maqam of Ibrahim. Which, i think, is explained extensively through AQ...

                Previously we know that there is a relation between maqamin and Aminin (4451). Within the verse 2125 itself, is there some kind of relationship between the characters of Albayt with Salla/Salaat? I mean

                mat.aabatan ~ AmnAn ~ muSallAn ?

                returning/gathering/summoning/congregation ~ safety/security/faith/peace ~ Salaat ?

                Peace

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • WakasW Offline
                  WakasW Offline
                  Wakas
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #20

                  peace herbman,

                  I'm unable to clarify the grammar aspect at the moment. However, either way, I'm not sure if it impacts my present view. Perhaps someone can clarify the grammar aspect.

                  All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • J Offline
                    J Offline
                    Joe_Betik
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #21

                    salamun AAalaykum herbman & the rest,

                    perhaps you may want to consider this

                    1. And then We made meditation (Wa-ith jaAAalna albayta) an asylum for people (mathabatan lilnnasi), and a method to appease the mind (waamnan), and you (pl.) make out of Ibrahim?s standing (waittakhithoo min maqami ibraheem), one with the burning desire to know (musallan). And We have assigned Ibrahim (waAAahidna ila ibraheema) and also Ismael (wa-ismaAAeel) to refine the meditation on Me (an tahhira baytiya), for those wandering in thoughts (liltta-ifeen) while devoting (waalAAakifeen), and also the respectfully acknowledging (waalrrukkaAAi alssujoodi).

                    2. And then Ibrahim said (Wa-ith qala ibraheem), ?My Lord, make this ?idiot? peaceful (rabbi ijAAal hatha baladan aminan), and provide my followers with the benefits (waorzuq ahlahu mina alththamarat), whoever among them who believe in God and the last day (man amana minhum biAllahi waalyawmi al-akhir).? He said (qala), ?But whoever is ungrateful (waman kafara), then his happiness is for a little while (faomattiAAuhu qaleelan), then I shall drive him to the agony of fire (thumma adtarruhu ila AAathabi alnnar). What an evil destination (wabi/sa almaseer)!?

                    may God guide us on the correct path, insha-Allah.

                    peace
                    mohammed noh

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • N Offline
                      N Offline
                      noble
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #22

                      Peace
                      I think what it means is the underlying practical aspect that the Salat as ritual prayer has direction,
                      and needs to be physically directed to maqam Ibrahim (the place where Ibrahim and his son built the first temple for mankind in Bekkah, and where the pilgrimage also happens).
                      This is further detailed in other verses...
                      You know Occam's razor (simplest arabic meaning of maqam is place).

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • M Offline
                        M Offline
                        Mazhar
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #23

                        mu- could well be the performer--i.e, a subject who performs something. In case of mubarak-, the performer of barakah -- e.g., if you take "barakah" as "blessing", then "mubarak-" is the performer/deliverer of blessing.

                        But the problem is that he is not performer, but passive participle.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • S Offline
                          S Offline
                          san
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #24

                          But the problem is that he is not performer, but passive participle.

                          Thanks. you're right.

                          This is erroneous in many ways

                          mu- could well be the performer--i.e, a subject who performs something. In case of mubarak-, the performer of barakah -- e.g., if you take "barakah" as "blessing", then "mubarak-" is the performer/deliverer of blessing.

                          first, i should've written it mubaarak-, and baaraka the verb not baarakah the noun. Then again the active participle is mubaarik- ... I was trying to view the passive participle as active participle. It doesn't work right, mostly. Forgive me for that. Seeing there is no mubaarik- mentioned in AQ may show that there is no one who "bless" other than God...

                          Peace

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • WakasW Offline
                            WakasW Offline
                            Wakas
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #25

                            peace Mazhar, all,

                            But the problem is that he is not performer, but passive participle.

                            Can you (or others) clarify if you mean "musallan" is a passive participle? I assume you do.

                            I think this may be correct, according to this which I quoted previously http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arabic_grammar

                            Stems II-X take prefix mu- and nominal endings for both the participles, active and passive. The difference between the two participles is only in the vowel between the last two root letters, which is -i- for active and -a- for passive (e.g. II. active mu-fail-un, and passive mu-faal-un&#039.

                            This would imply Abraham received the action expressed in the verb salla, which I would render as "to go/turn towards in a close/positive manner" or "to bond", or "to invoke blessings upon" (according to Toshihiko Izutsu).

                            Which would make sense in the context, literal "... and take from the position/status/stance of Abraham, the receiver of blessing/bonding, and We made a convenant to Abraham that "You shall purify..."

                            Also see 3343, 3356.

                            Thoughts?

                            All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • M Offline
                              M Offline
                              Mazhar
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #26

                              Can you (or others) clarify if you mean "musallan" is a passive participle? I assume you do.

                              I think this may be correct, according to this which I quoted previously http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arabic_grammar-Wakas

                              Peace, I had pointed out this

                              is

                              It is from .

                              And this is in accusative case ending; the direct object of the verb ; Imperative; second person; masculine; plural, with subject pronoun "". And which is object of the verb is any part from the standing place of Ibraheim alahissalam, who is the builder of the House; and the builder has obviously to stand on all the sides of four walls for raising them.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • WakasW Offline
                                WakasW Offline
                                Wakas
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #27

                                peace Mazhar,

                                Ahh ok, I think I understand now.

                                And take, from maqam Abraham, musallan.

                                I will need to ponder over the grammar/construction of musallan, unless it can be clarified.

                                However, I'm surprised you take maqam Abraham as a physical standing place, as this is not common for meaning of maqam in Al Quran. Secondly, it is completely refuted by 397

                                In it (bayt) clear/manifest signs/evidences, the stance/position/status of Abraham, and whoever enters it (bayt) is securing...

                                Can you clarify?

                                All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • M Offline
                                  M Offline
                                  Mazhar
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #28

                                  peace Mazhar,

                                  Ahh ok, I think I understand now.

                                  And take, from maqam Abraham, musallan.

                                  I will need to ponder over the grammar/construction of musallan, unless it can be clarified.

                                  Pl state what clarification you need. It is a location adverb. And is some/any part of the whole of the standing place of Ibraheim alaihissalam. The Arabic words are simple and straigtforward, no place to construe otherwise.

                                  However, I'm surprised you take maqam Abraham as a physical standing place, as this is not common for meaning of maqam in Al Quran. Secondly, it is completely refuted by 397.

                                  May be it is because you have not yet studied what the word Muqam means, and its usage at 18 places, which will InshaAllah leave no room not to perceive it correctly.

                                  In it (bayt) clear/manifest signs/evidences, the stance/position/status of Abraham, and whoever enters it (bayt) is securing...

                                  This too seems to be the result of not having analysed the first sentence of the Aayat. The first three words are a complete sentence which is the inverted one . Muqamu Inrahima is possessive phrase, the first becomes definite and conveyes the same meaning as being earlier discussed.

                                  Can you clarify?

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • H Offline
                                    H Offline
                                    herbman
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #29

                                    Thanks Wakas, Mazhar, all,

                                    here is a word with similar construction if you want to have a look

                                    found in verse 6114

                                    "Say "Shall I seek for judge other than Allah? when He it is Who hath sent unto you the Book, explained in detail." They know full well, to whom We have given the Book, that it hath been sent down from thy Lord in truth. Never be then of those who doubt."

                                    from PRL

                                    FASALA To set apart, separate, distinguish, set a limit, part, depart, decide, set out, divide into parts, expatiate into detail, make clear (statement), distinct, judge, narrate a thing with all its particulars.
                                    FASLUN Distinguishing, Decisive
                                    MUFASSALAN Clearly explained
                                    FUSSILAT Detailed
                                    MUFASSALAT Fully detailed

                                    Peace

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • WakasW Offline
                                      WakasW Offline
                                      Wakas
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #30

                                      peace Mazhar,

                                      By clarification of "musallan" I mean what does the grammar/construction of this word imply or tell us. What initially threw me was the use of "mu" as I thought if it was a place it would have been "ma". Is there any significance to the mu/ma in this case?

                                      From http//www.learnarabiconline.com/arabic-adverbs.shtml

                                      The locative adverb gives the time or place of occurrence for an action. This adverb, however, cannot be used to give the place of action if such a place has well-defined, physical limits.

                                      I'm not sure if the part in red has any significance or not, considering the traditional understanding of 'maqam Abraham' has well defined physical limits.

                                      In any case, here is my literal understanding
                                      take = plural, imperative, form 8 (generally reflexive)
                                      musallan = location adverb ~ place of salla

                                      "And take (for yourselves), from stance/position/status (of) Abraham, a place of/to salla"
                                      or
                                      "And take (for yourselves), from Abraham's stance/position/status, a place of/to salla"

                                      re 397

                                      This too seems to be the result of not having analysed the first sentence of the Aayat. The first three words are a complete sentence which is the inverted one . Muqamu Inrahima is possessive phrase, the first becomes definite and conveyes the same meaning as being earlier discussed.

                                      I don't understand what you mean here. Are you saying this

                                      "In it (bayt) clear/manifest signs/evidences. Abraham's stance/position/status, and whoever enters it (maqam Abraham) is securing."

                                      ?

                                      All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • M Offline
                                        M Offline
                                        Mazhar
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #31

                                        here is a word with similar construction if you want to have a look

                                        Thanks herbman,

                                        It is from " ", to segregate, alienate one from the other, demarcate, isolate one from the other--the effect of which is that the matter gets explained.
                                        The under study word is from " ".

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • H Offline
                                          H Offline
                                          herbman
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #32

                                          Thanks herbman,

                                          It is from " ", to segregate, alienate one from the other, demarcate, isolate one from the other--the effect of which is that the matter gets explained.
                                          The under study word is from " ".

                                          This was to help understanding sallah-->musalah, I read once in this forum someone who translated it by "LINKER" if salat means "LINK".
                                          This makes sense when we have a close look on FASALA-->MUFASALA, translated by "explained"-->"fully or well" explained, I would even say "explained by itself", which bring us to the conclusion

                                          Remember We made the BEIT a place of assembly for men and a place of safety; and take ye the position of Abraham (against polytheism) as a LINKER/self bondage/LINK by itself; and We covenanted with Abraham and Isma`il that they should sanctify My House for those who compass it round or use it as a retreat or bow, or prostrate themselves.

                                          any thought?
                                          Peace

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users