Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. Community Needs
  3. Pilgrimage (Hajj)
  4. hajj / feast / debate

hajj / feast / debate

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Pilgrimage (Hajj)
192 Posts 45 Posters 19.8k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    mmkhan
    wrote on last edited by
    #96

    Salaam all,

    1. First and foremost the Hebrew meaning of "feast" clearly fits the context of hagg/hajj in the great reading where 80% of the passages talk about food.

    80%

    I don't think I can agree with you on this.

    Can you please quote all the aayaats and show how 80% of the Hajj related aayaats talks about food?

    Thanks in advance.

    May Allah guide us all towards the truth pr
    Mohammed M. Khan

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • A Offline
      A Offline
      ayman
      wrote on last edited by
      #97

      Peace mmkhan,

      Salaam all,
      80% o
      I don't think I can agree with you on this.
      Can you please quote all the aayaats and show how 80% of the Hajj related aayaats talks about food?
      Thanks in advance.
      May Allah guide us all towards the truth pr
      Mohammed M. Khan

      It is probably easier for you to list the signs relating to "hagg"/feast that don't talk about food, since it would be a much shorter list.

      Peace,

      Ayman

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Offline
        M Offline
        Mazhar
        wrote on last edited by
        #98

        My translation

        Truly, the animals of milking and the stone of slaughtering/cooking are from the markers/ordinances/regulations of God, so whoever undertook debate (at) the House/Establishment or visited, there is no error on him that he should go about/amongst them. And whoever does good voluntarily, then The God is Appreciative/Recognising, Aware/Knowledgeable.

        Who are these "them"? Are animals of milking?

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • WakasW Offline
          WakasW Offline
          Wakas
          wrote on last edited by
          #99

          No, it is both ssafa and marwa.

          All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Offline
            M Offline
            Mazhar
            wrote on last edited by
            #100

            No, it is both ssafa and marwa.

            But ssafa and marwa is not there in the translation; they have become this

            My translation

            Truly, the animals of milking and the stone of slaughtering/cooking are from the markers/ordinances/regulations of God, so whoever undertook debate (at) the House/Establishment or visited, there is no error on him that he should go about/amongst them. And whoever does good voluntarily, then The God is Appreciative/Recognising, Aware/Knowledgeable.

            And what does "stone of slaughtering" mean? Whether a sharp stone used for slaughtering a mammal or a platform of stone where an animal is laid for slaugtering?

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • WakasW Offline
              WakasW Offline
              Wakas
              wrote on last edited by
              #101

              Yes, and whatever you translate ssafa and marwa as, the "them" refers to them.

              This is in Classical Arabic Dictionaries for "marwa" white fragile stone where a cooking fire is started, the stone on which an animal is slaughtered.

              All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M Offline
                M Offline
                Mazhar
                wrote on last edited by
                #102

                Yes, and whatever you translate ssafa and marwa as, the "them" refers to them.

                This is in Classical Arabic Dictionaries for "marwa" white fragile stone where a cooking fire is started, the stone on which an animal is slaughtered.

                No, I am talking about this translation

                Quote
                My translation

                Truly, the animals of milking and the stone of slaughtering/cooking are from the markers/ordinances/regulations of God, so whoever undertook debate (at) the House/Establishment or visited, there is no error on him that he should go about/amongst them. And whoever does good voluntarily, then The God is Appreciative/Recognising, Aware/Knowledgeable.

                The above means that you are suggesting that after holding the debate the person may go to the animals of milking and the stone of slaughtering for which there shall be no blame upon him.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • J Offline
                  J Offline
                  JSS
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #103

                  @RagingG

                  The Hebrew view of Hagg was helpful. Thank you.

                  It also led me to wonder if in the surah fragment " The first 'Bayt' appointed for men was that at Baca full of blessing and of guidance for all kinds of beings,"....could 'Baca' refer to 'first fruits' as in the Hebrew? I have always thought of Baca as a place but I think you have possibly illuminated something here.

                  Now many of you emphasize that bayt is wrongly thought of, in common thought, as a house.

                  In the opinion of the experts here, does the meaning of the word bayt correspond in any meaningful way if 'Baca' meant 'first fruits'?

                  I still think 'the fair at Botnah' (Mamre) is the location of this hajj to the bayt of the first fruits.but that is another issue.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • 1 Offline
                    1 Offline
                    1CELOSTNOWFOUND
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #104

                    Peace,

                    I have posted some ongoing research on hajj verses at quranwiki.net.

                    Check it out here

                    http//www.quranwiki.net/index.php?title=Hajj_Chapter_2

                    and here

                    http//www.quranwiki.net/index.php?title=Hajj_Chapter_22

                    These are incomplete and awaiting your input. Make changes if you wish.

                    Imraan

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • WakasW Offline
                      WakasW Offline
                      Wakas
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #105

                      peace all,

                      New article The Quran and 2196 - a lesson in critical thinking

                      http//www.islam-and-muslims.com/articles/Quran-2196-critical-thinking.html

                      All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • A Offline
                        A Offline
                        ayman
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #106

                        Peace brother Wakas,

                        peace all,
                        New article The Quran and 2196 - a lesson in critical thinking
                        http//www.islam-and-muslims.com/articles/Quran-2196-critical-thinking.html

                        Great analysis.

                        So what do you think the full translation of 2196 should be?

                        Peace,

                        Ayman

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • WakasW Offline
                          WakasW Offline
                          Wakas
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #107

                          peace Bro Ayman,

                          2196 And complete the conference/symposium and the visit for God.
                          So if you are prevented/restrained then (give) what is easy of the offering/gift and do not relieve/cancel your chiefs/representatives (of this duty) until the offering reaches its permitted/lawful place (al bayt al atiq, see 2233),
                          so whoever from among you was sick (singular) or with him hurt/harm/annoyance from his chief then redeem from abstinence/fast or charity or observance.
                          So when (time adverb) you (plural) are safe/secure (i.e. in the designated vicinty) then whoever benefited/enjoyed in/with the visit to the conference/symposium then (give) what is easy of the offering so whoever couldn't find (singular) then an abstinence/fast three days during the conference/symposium and seven when you (plural) returned, this is ten complete.
                          That is for one whose people are not at-hand/present (at) the inviolable time of acknowledgement/SJD, and be conscious of God and know that God is severe in punishment.

                          If you, or anyone, finds any fault in the above, please let me know. Thanks.

                          All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • M Offline
                            M Offline
                            matinbhagat
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #108

                            Peace brother Ayman,

                            I noticed you mentioned arabic is full of inconsistencies and quoted the nafaqa as an example of spending and also of hypocrisy. However, nafaq means keeping open, hence a hypocrite instead of being on any side, keeps open the possibility to jump to any one side which has the upper hand? Makes sense? Another key question, if arabic is full of inconsistences then how and why would Allah send us a message which we cannot understand? Unless of course you mean the arabic inconsistencies do not affect the quran per se? I am very interested in this and read a number of your thought provoking articles. Like you I have been actively in search of archaeological information of pre-quranic arabia. I came across a couple of interesting links and thought it may be worth discussing it with you and whoever else here who are interested.

                            These 3 inscriptions were found in madinah/yahtrib saudi arabia and appears to have names of muhammad ,abu bakr and umar. dated to around 4 AH. This then puts muhammad probably in this area as opposed to the lakhamid province?

                            http//www.islamic-awareness.org/History/Islam/Inscriptions/hamid1.html

                            http//www.islamic-awareness.org/History/Islam/Inscriptions/hamid2.html

                            http//www.islamic-awareness.org/History/Islam/Inscriptions/hamid3.html

                            Also,

                            http//staff.aub.edu.lb/~webbultn/v7n9/article31.htm

                            The article is about authenticity of pre-islamic poetry and them being found on inscriptions in yemen at very early period. Please refer to it and see the arguments laid out, not sure if I can access the article.

                            "The professor devoted his talk to the defense of the authenticity of pre-Islamic poetry, which has been brought into question a number of times, particularly by Taha Husayn and some Orientalists. His lecture brought to light new discoveries of pre-Islamic poetry that were discovered in inscription form in Yemen and the Arabian Peninsula. These include examples of the Mu'allaqat (a canonical set of the most famous pre-Islamic poems), which were inscribed on rocks during the first century after Hijra (the seventh century AD)."

                            Peace brother.

                            P.S. I am very concerned about the implications/assertions of the inconsistencies of the arabic language as it is necessary for us to learn the message of Allah.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • A Offline
                              A Offline
                              ayman
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #109

                              Peace brother Wakas,

                              2196 And complete the conference/symposium and the visit for God.
                              So if you are prevented/restrained then (give) what is easy of the offering/gift and do not relieve/cancel your chiefs/representatives (of this duty) until the offering reaches its permitted/lawful place (al bayt al atiq, see 2233),
                              so whoever from among you was sick (singular) or with him hurt/harm/annoyance from his chief then redeem from abstinence/fast or charity or observance.
                              So when (time adverb) you (plural) are safe/secure (i.e. in the designated vicinty) then whoever benefited/enjoyed in/with the visit to the conference/symposium then (give) what is easy of the offering so whoever couldn't find (singular) then an abstinence/fast three days during the conference/symposium and seven when you (plural) returned, this is ten complete.
                              That is for one whose people are not at-hand/present (at) the inviolable time of acknowledgement/SJD, and be conscious of God and know that God is severe in punishment.
                              If you, or anyone, finds any fault in the above, please let me know. Thanks.

                              Brother Wakas, your translation is a real eye opener. I think that there are only two things I would change

                              1. Your translation of masjid as "time of acknowledgement" is interesting but I am not sure it would fit all occurrences. I think that "institution" as opposed to "time" fits everywhere.

                              2. It is clear that the emphasis and importance is placed on the offering/gift. Even one's attendance is secondary to ensuring that the offering takes place. Logically, this tilts the scale heavily in favor of "hagg" being a feast and not a conference/symposium.

                              Peace and best regards,

                              Ayman

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • A Offline
                                A Offline
                                ayman
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #110

                                Peace brother Matinbhagat,

                                Thank you for your informative post.

                                I noticed you mentioned arabic is full of inconsistencies and quoted the nafaqa as an example of spending and also of hypocrisy. However, nafaq means keeping open, hence a hypocrite instead of being on any side, keeps open the possibility to jump to any one side which has the upper hand? Makes sense?

                                Another key question, if arabic is full of inconsistences then how and why would Allah send us a message which we cannot understand? Unless of course you mean the arabic inconsistencies do not affect the quran per se?

                                All human languages are full of inconsistencies. Arabic is merely a human language and it didn't descend from the sky. This is actually one of the amazing things about the great reading. It uses an inconsistent vernacular human language to deliver a consistent and powerful message.

                                There are many examples other than NFQ. Of course, one can always try hard to connect meanings but this can be done with any two vaguely related words. Take for example HGG, on one hand it means "argue" and on the other hand it means "feast" (from Hebrew). In fact, many words in the great reading are not Arabic at all but have their origin in other Semitic or even non-Semitic languages like Persian and Greek.

                                I am very interested in this and read a number of your thought provoking articles. Like you I have been actively in search of archaeological information of pre-quranic arabia. I came across a couple of interesting links and thought it may be worth discussing it with you and whoever else here who are interested.
                                These 3 inscriptions were found in madinah/yahtrib saudi arabia and appears to have names of muhammad ,abu bakr and umar. dated to around 4 AH. This then puts muhammad probably in this area as opposed to the lakhamid province?
                                http//www.islamic-awareness.org/History/Islam/Inscriptions/hamid1.html
                                http//www.islamic-awareness.org/History/Islam/Inscriptions/hamid2.html
                                http//www.islamic-awareness.org/History/Islam/Inscriptions/hamid3.html

                                No serious researcher dates those inscriptions to 4AH. They are similar and probably even newer than the following inscription dated to 84AH (early 8th century CE)

                                http//www.islamic-awareness.org/History/Islam/Inscriptions/makkah4.html

                                Also,
                                http//staff.aub.edu.lb/~webbultn/v7n9/article31.htm
                                The article is about authenticity of pre-islamic poetry and them being found on inscriptions in yemen at very early period. Please refer to it and see the arguments laid out, not sure if I can access the article.
                                "The professor devoted his talk to the defense of the authenticity of pre-Islamic poetry, which has been brought into question a number of times, particularly by Taha Husayn and some Orientalists. His lecture brought to light new discoveries of pre-Islamic poetry that were discovered in inscription form in Yemen and the Arabian Peninsula. These include examples of the Mu'allaqat (a canonical set of the most famous pre-Islamic poems), which were inscribed on rocks during the first century after Hijra (the seventh century AD)."

                                I can?t see the article in the link and it just refers to the lecture.

                                If you look at all the actual the pre-Islamic (Capital I) inscriptions on the Islamic Awareness web site, you will find that they bear no resemblance in style or language to so-called pre-Islamic poetry.

                                P.S. I am very concerned about the implications/assertions of the inconsistencies of the arabic language as it is necessary for us to learn the message of Allah.

                                Brother, the fact is that many people, including some who studied Arabic all their lifes and some who think that Arabic is a sacred and consistent language, don?t understand the message. Ironically, one of the reasons why most often don?t understand the message is that we elevate the language above the message and turn it into some sort of sacred language. Take for instance the word ?allah?, which you used but left untranslated. Most Arabic speakers treat it as a sacred Arabic word that shouldn?t be translated and thus don?t even know that it actually has the definite article and it means ?the god?. So they end up using it in ungrammatical sentences that are actually ridiculous in Arabic. For example, they will pray and say ?ya allah? when in Arabic it is ungrammatical and ridiculous just like saying ?ya alragul? (o the man). In Arabic you should add the device ?ayuha? (you) before definite words. So we say ?ya ayuha alragul? (Literally O you the man). However, in Arabic ?ayuha? is not a respectful way to address someone. So in the great reading we find the word ?allahum? used instead to convey the same meaning only in the case of the god. So ironically here we see inconsistency in language but the message is consistent and powerful.

                                Peace and best regards,

                                Ayman

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • D Offline
                                  D Offline
                                  drfazl
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #111

                                  Hajj is the 'individualised Wish of God' blessed to every soul independently, which it shall live out in this world to the fullest satisfaction of Allah; And 'Unra' is his 'Efforts' towards gaining it through patience, endurance, steadfastness while seeking to strenghen his belief and faith in Him.

                                  2196
                                  Begin your Hajj and Umra in the Way of Allah; and if you are blocked then preserve in righteousness and persevere; and until you reach your goal, never slacken in the determination; however if any of you due to weakness slackens then his due compensation is fasting, or to spend for the needy, or to sacrifice from his valuables; and when peace comesforth unto him, let him fulfil to a great extent possible his obligation from Umra to Hajj by giving his valuables; and if this is not possible let him complete ten days? fasting- three, during the Hajj journey and seven when he is contented; and this is for those whose heart is not upon the sacredness and so fear Allah; and know that Allah is severe in punishing.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • WakasW Offline
                                    WakasW Offline
                                    Wakas
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #112

                                    salaam drfazl,
                                    Thanks for your translation of 2196 however you may wish to see http//www.islam-and-muslims.com/articles/Quran-2196-critical-thinking.html
                                    Also, in terms of someone actually being able to verify your translation you may wish to provide a word for word.

                                    All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • WakasW Offline
                                      WakasW Offline
                                      Wakas
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #113

                                      peace Bro Ayman,

                                      Peace brother Wakas,

                                      Brother Wakas, your translation is a real eye opener. I think that there are only two things I would change

                                      1. Your translation of masjid as "time of acknowledgement" is interesting but I am not sure it would fit all occurrences. I think that "institution" as opposed to "time" fits everywhere.

                                      2. It is clear that the emphasis and importance is placed on the offering/gift. Even one's attendance is secondary to ensuring that the offering takes place. Logically, this tilts the scale heavily in favor of "hagg" being a feast and not a conference/symposium.

                                      Even with our different word choices, in terms of practical application, it would appear to make little difference.

                                      It's now just a matter of putting the verses together.

                                      All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • I Offline
                                        I Offline
                                        Ilyusha
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #114

                                        How can these two verses be reconciled with each other's meanings

                                        O ye who believe! Truly the ?mushriks? (polytheists) are ?Najas? (impure, unclean, etc.); so let them not after this year of theirs approach the Sacred Mosque.

                                        And call out to mankind with the Pilgrimage, they will come to you walking and on every transport, they will come from every deep enclosure.

                                        Because many from the "mankind" are mushrik, as we know from 12106 as well as from a posteriori.

                                        Please give your opinion.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • Y Offline
                                          Y Offline
                                          youssef4342
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #115

                                          Peace back to everyone who said peace

                                          if hajj was instituted to Abraham, then a suggestion would be looking at the previous scriptures,

                                          read http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9599972.0

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users