Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. Community Needs
  3. Pilgrimage (Hajj)
  4. hajj / feast / debate

hajj / feast / debate

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Pilgrimage (Hajj)
192 Posts 45 Posters 19.8k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • 1 Offline
    1 Offline
    1CELOSTNOWFOUND
    wrote on last edited by
    #87

    Peace ayman,

    Early on in this thread you made reference to nafaqa and how the root brings about contradictory meanings. Can you please post the link where you discuss this? I hope that I haven't misrepresented your post as I couldn't find it.

    Imraan

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • W Offline
      W Offline
      Wilson
      wrote on last edited by
      #88

      Peace,

      Peace ayman,

      Early on in this thread you made reference to nafaqa and how the root brings about contradictory meanings. Can you please post the link where you discuss this? I hope that I haven't misrepresented your post as I couldn't find it.

      Imraan

      Discussed here, and here. And the reference you were looking for is somewhere in the last part of THIS post.

      Abdelilah

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • S Offline
        S Offline
        san
        wrote on last edited by
        #89

        It won't be as contradictory as you think, if you can see the pattern "to come out of a hole; to enter into another hole where there is another outlet" (taken from PRL online, root nun-fa-qaf)

        a hypocrite enters an "inlet" (e.g. of faith) only to come out from another "outlet" (along the line of that faith).

        a sum of wealth enters one of your pockets/wallets/accounts/ways to be spent out from one of your other pockets/wallets/accounts/ways

        (think of "tunnel/channel" in English)

        my bad, irrelevant example now removed

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • H Offline
          H Offline
          herbman
          wrote on last edited by
          #90

          Peace Ayman, all,

          First, thanks for your time and answer.

          You then translate hajj = feast. This is the noon Al hajj = The feast

          How would you translate the verbe. As in "faman hajja al baita".

          I guess you will use a completly different word, but the question is why would you use different meanings for a word with the same root. I know sometimes it occurs but still 99% of the words share the same root to describe an action (verb) and the object derived from the action (noon), e.g root Ka-ta-ba
          action kataba= to write
          object al kitab = the book
          (I know you know this, this is for the audience)
          Peace

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • A Offline
            A Offline
            ayman
            wrote on last edited by
            #91

            Peace San,

            It won't be as contradictory as you think, if you can see the pattern "to come out of a hole; to enter into another hole where there is another outlet" (taken from PRL online, root nun-fa-qaf)
            a hypocrite enters an "inlet" (e.g. of faith) only to come out from another "outlet" (along the line of that faith).
            a sum of wealth enters one of your pockets/wallets/accounts/ways to be spent out from one of your other pockets/wallets/accounts/ways
            (think of "tunnel/channel" in English)
            my bad, irrelevant example now removed

            I think that lexigraphers can come with some fairly far fetched explanations for divergent meanings. However, these same forms for NFQ and MuNAFQ ("F3L" and "MuFA3L&quot don't have such divergent meanings with other roots. For example, "DF3" (push) and "MuDAF3" (pusher/defender). I would say that it is just the nature of any human language to have oddities. Also, a proto-Semitic language may have indeed had the meaning the same but then it diverged through different languages and then one language later re-imported the foreign meaning. So we end up with two divergent meanings for the same root.

            There are other examples of divergent meanings within the root. I already mentioned HJJ and SB7 where the imported foreign meaning has a different sense than the Arabic root. Another example is BRK. It can mean "fall on its chest" or bless/multiply (the imported meaning).

            Peace,

            Ayman

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • A Offline
              A Offline
              ayman
              wrote on last edited by
              #92

              Peace Herbman,

              First, thanks for your time and answer.
              You then translate hajj = feast. This is the noon Al hajj = The feast
              How would you translate the verbe. As in "faman hajja al baita".
              I guess you will use a completly different word, but the question is why would you use different meanings for a word with the same root. I know sometimes it occurs but still 99% of the words share the same root to describe an action (verb) and the object derived from the action (noon), e.g root Ka-ta-ba
              action kataba= to write
              object al kitab = the book
              (I know you know this, this is for the audience)

              No need to use a different meaning since it is the same context of feeding. The expression "feasted the house" may sound strange in English. However, think of it in the same way as "blessed the house", in other words, brought his blessing to the house. Similarly, in my opinion "feasted the house" would be "brought his feast to the house", or brought food to the house.

              Peace,

              Ayman

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S Offline
                S Offline
                san
                wrote on last edited by
                #93

                Peace Ayman,

                Peace San,

                I think that lexigraphers can come with some fairly far fetched explanations for divergent meanings. However, these same forms for NFQ and MuNAFQ ("F3L" and "MuFA3L&quot don't have such divergent meanings with other roots. For example, "DF3" (push) and "MuDAF3" (pusher/defender). I would say that it is just the nature of any human language to have oddities. Also, a proto-Semitic language may have indeed had the meaning the same but then it diverged through different languages and then one language later re-imported the foreign meaning. So we end up with two divergent meanings for the same root.

                If i saw it to be far-fetched, then personally i would exercise the option of removing the specific term "hypocrite" from the equation.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • WakasW Online
                  WakasW Online
                  Wakas
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #94

                  peace Bro Ayman, all,

                  I only read up on "hagg sukot" (Feast of Tabernacles) today and it seems its core aspects are very similar to HJJ of AQ
                  http//www.wildolive.co.uk/sukot.htm

                  The word "tabernacles" come from tents, which implies travel and likely to certain location for a festival/feast/gathering. The timing seems similar. They also remember God, utilise/celebrate the Torah, spread the message, and it is open for all nations apparently. It also talks about representatives.

                  Previously, I did not realise it had these other aspects.

                  All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • A Offline
                    A Offline
                    ayman
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #95

                    Peace brother Wakas,

                    I only read up on "hagg sukot" (Feast of Tabernacles) today and it seems its core aspects are very similar to HJJ of AQ
                    http//www.wildolive.co.uk/sukot.htm
                    The word "tabernacles" come from tents, which implies travel and likely to certain location for a festival/feast/gathering. The timing seems similar. They also remember God, utilise/celebrate the Torah, spread the message, and it is open for all nations apparently. It also talks about representatives.
                    Previously, I did not realise it had these other aspects.

                    It is good to hear from you on this subject.

                    Yes the timing of Hagg Sukot coincides with the fourth full-moon after the summer solstice (the last of the four inviolable full-moons). If you look at the essence of Hagg Sukot beyond the manmade rituals, it is essentially a harvest feast to eat and feed others and thank the god for the harvest. As you noted, probably the tents are remenants pointing to both the travel aspect and the need to accomodate the masses coming to the inviolable house.

                    Peace and all best wishes,

                    Ayman

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • M Offline
                      M Offline
                      mmkhan
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #96

                      Salaam all,

                      1. First and foremost the Hebrew meaning of "feast" clearly fits the context of hagg/hajj in the great reading where 80% of the passages talk about food.

                      80%

                      I don't think I can agree with you on this.

                      Can you please quote all the aayaats and show how 80% of the Hajj related aayaats talks about food?

                      Thanks in advance.

                      May Allah guide us all towards the truth pr
                      Mohammed M. Khan

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • A Offline
                        A Offline
                        ayman
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #97

                        Peace mmkhan,

                        Salaam all,
                        80% o
                        I don't think I can agree with you on this.
                        Can you please quote all the aayaats and show how 80% of the Hajj related aayaats talks about food?
                        Thanks in advance.
                        May Allah guide us all towards the truth pr
                        Mohammed M. Khan

                        It is probably easier for you to list the signs relating to "hagg"/feast that don't talk about food, since it would be a much shorter list.

                        Peace,

                        Ayman

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • M Offline
                          M Offline
                          Mazhar
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #98

                          My translation

                          Truly, the animals of milking and the stone of slaughtering/cooking are from the markers/ordinances/regulations of God, so whoever undertook debate (at) the House/Establishment or visited, there is no error on him that he should go about/amongst them. And whoever does good voluntarily, then The God is Appreciative/Recognising, Aware/Knowledgeable.

                          Who are these "them"? Are animals of milking?

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • WakasW Online
                            WakasW Online
                            Wakas
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #99

                            No, it is both ssafa and marwa.

                            All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • M Offline
                              M Offline
                              Mazhar
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #100

                              No, it is both ssafa and marwa.

                              But ssafa and marwa is not there in the translation; they have become this

                              My translation

                              Truly, the animals of milking and the stone of slaughtering/cooking are from the markers/ordinances/regulations of God, so whoever undertook debate (at) the House/Establishment or visited, there is no error on him that he should go about/amongst them. And whoever does good voluntarily, then The God is Appreciative/Recognising, Aware/Knowledgeable.

                              And what does "stone of slaughtering" mean? Whether a sharp stone used for slaughtering a mammal or a platform of stone where an animal is laid for slaugtering?

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • WakasW Online
                                WakasW Online
                                Wakas
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #101

                                Yes, and whatever you translate ssafa and marwa as, the "them" refers to them.

                                This is in Classical Arabic Dictionaries for "marwa" white fragile stone where a cooking fire is started, the stone on which an animal is slaughtered.

                                All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • M Offline
                                  M Offline
                                  Mazhar
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #102

                                  Yes, and whatever you translate ssafa and marwa as, the "them" refers to them.

                                  This is in Classical Arabic Dictionaries for "marwa" white fragile stone where a cooking fire is started, the stone on which an animal is slaughtered.

                                  No, I am talking about this translation

                                  Quote
                                  My translation

                                  Truly, the animals of milking and the stone of slaughtering/cooking are from the markers/ordinances/regulations of God, so whoever undertook debate (at) the House/Establishment or visited, there is no error on him that he should go about/amongst them. And whoever does good voluntarily, then The God is Appreciative/Recognising, Aware/Knowledgeable.

                                  The above means that you are suggesting that after holding the debate the person may go to the animals of milking and the stone of slaughtering for which there shall be no blame upon him.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • J Offline
                                    J Offline
                                    JSS
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #103

                                    @RagingG

                                    The Hebrew view of Hagg was helpful. Thank you.

                                    It also led me to wonder if in the surah fragment " The first 'Bayt' appointed for men was that at Baca full of blessing and of guidance for all kinds of beings,"....could 'Baca' refer to 'first fruits' as in the Hebrew? I have always thought of Baca as a place but I think you have possibly illuminated something here.

                                    Now many of you emphasize that bayt is wrongly thought of, in common thought, as a house.

                                    In the opinion of the experts here, does the meaning of the word bayt correspond in any meaningful way if 'Baca' meant 'first fruits'?

                                    I still think 'the fair at Botnah' (Mamre) is the location of this hajj to the bayt of the first fruits.but that is another issue.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • 1 Offline
                                      1 Offline
                                      1CELOSTNOWFOUND
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #104

                                      Peace,

                                      I have posted some ongoing research on hajj verses at quranwiki.net.

                                      Check it out here

                                      http//www.quranwiki.net/index.php?title=Hajj_Chapter_2

                                      and here

                                      http//www.quranwiki.net/index.php?title=Hajj_Chapter_22

                                      These are incomplete and awaiting your input. Make changes if you wish.

                                      Imraan

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • WakasW Online
                                        WakasW Online
                                        Wakas
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #105

                                        peace all,

                                        New article The Quran and 2196 - a lesson in critical thinking

                                        http//www.islam-and-muslims.com/articles/Quran-2196-critical-thinking.html

                                        All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • A Offline
                                          A Offline
                                          ayman
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #106

                                          Peace brother Wakas,

                                          peace all,
                                          New article The Quran and 2196 - a lesson in critical thinking
                                          http//www.islam-and-muslims.com/articles/Quran-2196-critical-thinking.html

                                          Great analysis.

                                          So what do you think the full translation of 2196 should be?

                                          Peace,

                                          Ayman

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users