Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. The "Difference between Messengers/Prophets" .

The "Difference between Messengers/Prophets" .

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
80 Posts 12 Posters 1.3k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • U Offline
    U Offline
    unknownuser
    wrote on last edited by
    #31

    Peace be upon you Marie,

    The universe is an open book, nor you neither me we can hide any thing from it.

    Yes it is an open book of observable LAWS, but there are things being hidden from this open book. People are PURPOSELY NOT being educated so that this "HIDING" can continue on. True, the answers are right there in the open, but the blind cannot see. Not the blindness of the eyes, but of the hearts.

    Lets take for example homosexuality, there are many promoting it even though they are not homosexual themselves. They are HIDING the truth about it to those who cannot see for themselves. The examples are too numerous to list.

    Quote
    2159. Surely those who conceal what We have sent down to them which was clear, and the guidance, after God Had made it clear in the Scripture; these will be cursed by God and be cursed by those who curse.

    The word in this verse is "book", not scripture. By using scripture, you are hiding the clarity that the God is refering to the Universe(Al kitaab). So we read;

    (2159) SURELY those who hide/conceal what The God descended from the clarity and the guidance from after We clarified it to the people in The Book , those, The God curses them them, and the cursors curse them.

    The God clarifies things through his universe, the laws within the universe. Clarity and guidance comes from reading and reflecting on the laws of the universe, but others come and hide the clarity and guidance. Like feeding people instead of teaching them the laws of agriculture, to keep them enslaved.

    Quote
    2174. Surely, those who conceal what God has sent down of the Scripture, and they purchase with it a cheap price; they will not eat in their stomachs except the Fire, and God will not speak to them on the Day of Resurrection, nor will He purify them, and they will have a painful retribution.

    Again, its book, not scripture.

    You state that The God did not send any book out of the sky, focus only on what is said in 691, don't substitute the God's words.

    Who then has sent down the ScriptureBook/alkitab which Moses had come with, a light and a guidance for the people?

    Yes, Musa came with it (the UNDERSTANDING of the universe), not some "best seller" D Later, what Musa and all prophets intuit are writen down in order to remember it and spread the message.

    The God doesn't speak only about One Book/kitab (singular form) but also the books/kutub (plural form of kitab) which are sent upon His messengers

    2285 The Messenger has full Conviction in what is revealed unto him from his Lord and so do the believers. Each one has full conviction in Allah, His angels, His Scriptures/Books/kutubihi and His Messengers. They say, We make no distinction between any of His Messengers (since they were one in Purpose). And they say, We hear and we obey, so grant us the protection of forgiveness, our Lord. We journey through life on Your Way.

    4136 O You who have chosen to be graced with belief! (and call yourselves Muslims)! Believe in Allah and His Messenger, and the Book/alkitab He has revealed to His Messenger, and ( the fact that He revealed) the Scripture/alkitab before. (Belief to the point of Conviction can only be attained through reason and not as a birth right (1210). One who denies Allah, and His Angels, and His Books/kutubihi, and His Messengers, and the Last Day, has gone far astray.

    Humans who achive a high level intuit the truth about the created Universe(al kitaab) from within. Afterward, they write it down. SO yes, one can adress it in terms of plural (books) in that respect, but the wisdom comes from the UNIFYING of the message. Therefore while there were and ARE many messengers, we are told NOT TO DIFFERENTIATE. That is why we see both the plural and singular usage of the word "kitaab/book". The God seperates the messengers in order for us to learn the individual lessons and COMBINE them all within our being, not to leave them seperate (differentiating). In the last verse you gave above, notice that the PLURAL is associated with the deniers. The verse befpre that starts of in plural but then clarifies that these ALL SHALL BE ONE (no differentation).

    The KEY is in thinking WHOLISTICALLY! D

    There were not a whole bunch of physical books sent down from the sky with different names (quran, torah, injeel, psalms) NO! D The God descends TURTH about the Universe, and that truth is written down in different pages. But we must combine ALL TRUTH, no matter how old it is, into the ONE TRUTH which is consistent with the universe(al kitaab) always. There is NO CHANGE in the God's way. D

    Quote
    Scientists and prophets are not at the same level, the scientific discoveries is the fruit of several years of research. The God guides every one who seeks to improve his knowledge about the creation.

    Was it not research when Abraham looked to the sky and saw the stars , moon, and sun?

    Marie
    You see only what you want to see

    Okay, but I am asking you what YOU see D What was Abraham doing?

    How can the prophet describe fro example the stages of the embryogenesis there is 1400 years, did he have a laboratory, scanner,microscope? Did he practice surgery?

    The same way that the people of ancient Kemet made all of thier "discoveries" long before that. They knew the earth was round, they understood the atom (comes from "atem"). They understood the 9 step process of creation which is why thier "tree of life" has nine metaphysical faculties leading to the 10th faculty of this material illusion. (9 months)

    YOu see, what the ancients knew and what this reading is telling us is that the same things happen on different levels. I recommend a book that will help you understand all this. Contact me if you are interested to study it. This is yet another thing that is HIDDEN in the book, the fact that the ancients kew MANY of the things that western scientists are just now discovering, not just the so called "muslim" world, but the Africans who started the first civilization as well and many other cultures. It is a trick to make people think that only "modern" things are advanced, and by default, the older civilizations were not advanced. Its a white supremecy strategy.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M Offline
      M Offline
      marie
      wrote on last edited by
      #32

      Peace Kyle,

      We have not the same methodology to understand both this Reading and the creation.
      I consider this Reading as a guide like the whole creation and I use the evidence of this Reading to prove a point and not to use a personnal point to fit it to the Reading.

      Quote
      How can the prophet describe fro example the stages of the embryogenesis there is 1400 years, did he have a laboratory, scanner,microscope? Did he practice surgery?

      The same way that the people of ancient Kemet made all of thier "discoveries" long before that.

      I invite you to read the verse where the God describes the embryogenesis, this is not the prophet who speaks about his discovery but this is the God's word "we create....".

      There is NO CHANGE in the God's way

      Right, but We don't understand it in the same way

      Just to remind you our discussion about Dolly and Kaguya

      Jesus, Virgin Births, Miracles, Symbolisms, cont...

      I consider Dolly and Kagua as a conrete example

      Before them, ewes and mice result from egg + sperm
      Dolly and kaguya do not result from sperm + egg

      In them a good lesson for those who choose to consider them.
      the God gave them the life according His will and He doesn't break His law.

      We cannot consider a part of science and reject some of it.

      The question is are you ready to consider these examples to improve your knowlege of the God's law?

      Peace

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • U Offline
        U Offline
        unknownuser
        wrote on last edited by
        #33

        Peace be upon you Marie,

        We have not the same methodology to understand both this Reading and the creation.

        SO that is why we debate(hajja) without arguing(jidala), so we can come to common ground of truth.

        I consider this Reading as a guide like the whole creation and I use the evidence of this Reading to prove a point and not to use a personnal point to fit it to the Reading.

        What personal point? Yes, this reading(quran) is a light to help us read the Ultimate reading, The BOOK(al kitaab, the universe, our lives).

        Quote
        How can the prophet describe fro example the stages of the embryogenesis there is 1400 years, did he have a laboratory, scanner,microscope? Did he practice surgery?

        The same way that the people of ancient Kemet made all of thier "discoveries" long before that.

        I invite you to read the verse where the God describes the embryogenesis, this is not the prophet who speaks about his discovery but this is the God's word "we create....".

        Yes , WE! We means that ALL is ONE. We are the manifestation of the God, parts of the Whole. There is nothing but the God.

        Quote
        There is NO CHANGE in the God's way

        Right, but We don't understand it in the same way

        Just to remind you our discussion about Dolly and Kaguya

        Jesus, Virgin Births, Miracles, Symbolisms, cont...

        I consider Dolly and Kagua as a conrete example

        Before them, ewes and mice result from egg + sperm
        Dolly and kaguya do not result from sperm + egg

        All things result from the male principle and female principle coming together, this is what is meant by the symbol of teh Kemetic "Ankh". It is the joining of the male and female. Sperm is an aspect of the male and egg of the female. The scientists have only done the same thing at a more minute level, before the level of sperm and egg, but still using the male and female UNION to create life, there is no life without the union of male and female.

        In them a good lesson for those who choose to consider them.
        the God gave them the life according His will and He doesn't break His law.

        We cannot consider a part of science and reject some of it.

        The question is are you ready to consider these examples to improve your knowlege of the God's law?

        I hope I have proven so by my statement that YES, they did not use the sperm and egg, but still male and female union, on a smaller molecular level. The fact remains that unless male and female principles/forces/faculties unite, there is no life.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          Fahad1
          wrote on last edited by
          #34

          Peace Saladin

          Nice work on compiling the verses
          But how your idea on prophets are types of messengers fits 381

          ...........
          381 clearly states that the convenant is only made with all prophets, but there will be a messenger who is not in the convenant that will confirm/authenticate what is with the prophets.

          So are you suggesting that the messenger in 381 is a non-human messenger?

          Peace

          peace loli.
          the messenger who would confirm the previous scriptures could b any messenger . it could also be a messenger prophet . it could also be the koran that confirms the previous scriptures .
          btw i believe that the messenger in 381 was prophet muhammed .
          peace .

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • S Offline
            S Offline
            shuaib
            wrote on last edited by
            #35

            salam idolfree,

            Well like I said before, with such little common ground, how can a discussion be fruitful? You have to agree on the simple things before going on to the complex.. and here we do NOT agree on the simple things.

            You persistently push the idea of mixing the pure Quran with all the other impure corruptions out there (books which even the followers admit are corrupted). This is inexcusable in my opinion.

            Also the persistent idea that you have that everyone can receive wahi which is an absolutely unproven statement without any support whatsoever.

            But we've gone in circles before haven't we? Like I've said in the past, someone who can turn the meaning of a basic word like kitaab into something esoteric like universe using only word games as proofs... then how can anyone expect a fruitful result?

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M Offline
              M Offline
              marie
              wrote on last edited by
              #36

              Peace Kyle,

              they did not use the sperm and egg, but still male and female union, on a smaller molecular level. The fact remains that unless male and female principles/forces/faculties unite, there is no life.

              About Dolly and Kaguya, there is no male and female union at any level.
              You see only your own logic despite it is not supported by scientific arguments.

              To you is your understanding , and to me is mine )

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • U Offline
                U Offline
                unknownuser
                wrote on last edited by
                #37

                Peace be upon you Shuiab,

                Well like I said before, with such little common ground, how can a discussion be fruitful? You have to agree on the simple things before going on to the complex.. and here we do NOT agree on the simple things.

                You persistently push the idea of mixing the pure Quran with all the other impure corruptions out there (books which even the followers admit are corrupted). This is inexcusable in my opinion.

                Mixing? It sounds like you have a partner with the God. I follow the God and his messenger, which means I follow TRUTH, no matter what piece of paper it is written on. When you say "mixing" are you trying to imply that I am telling people tgo follow the so called Bible or things like that? If so, then you need to go back and read my position again because you have not understood.

                Also the persistent idea that you have that everyone can receive wahi which is an absolutely unproven statement without any support whatsoever.

                If you recive no INSPIRATION (wahi) then how do you CHANGE?

                But we've gone in circles before haven't we? Like I've said in the past, someone who can turn the meaning of a basic word like kitaab into something esoteric like universe using only word games as proofs... then how can anyone expect a fruitful result?

                The God states that the universe will be rolled up like a scroll(book). When you realize that ALL THINGS are sounds (Be and it becomes), and that all things in creation are AYAATS(signs), then you will see what I am saying. Until then "good luck" in your journey and Peace to you.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • U Offline
                  U Offline
                  unknownuser
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #38

                  Peace be upon you Marie,

                  There is NO LIFE without the male and female principle. Humans have within them what is referred to as the LIFE FORCE. Some call it bio kenetic energy or all kinds of names. Chinese call it "chi", Hindus "kundalini", christians call it "holy spirit" (but don't really know what it means), this reading calls it "ruh ul qudus", etc.

                  It is the ENERGY that moves ALL THINGS, that POWERS all things. NOthing happens without it.

                  Sperm is the transfer of this ENERGY.

                  In the case of Dolly, instead of sperm being the MALE PRINCIPLE, the scientist used ANOTHER SOURCE OF ENERGY. Yes, not from a species with the male GENDER, but still from the MALE PRINCIPLE.

                  Here is a clear color diagram of the process

                  http//science.howstuffworks.com/cloning3.htm

                  Sorry dear sister, but there is no getting around the God's Law.

                  Energy(M)+ Matter(F) = Life

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • M Offline
                    M Offline
                    marie
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #39

                    Peace Kyle,

                    In the case of Dolly, instead of sperm being the MALE PRINCIPLE, the scientist used ANOTHER SOURCE OF ENERGY. Yes, not from a species with the male GENDER.
                    .

                    That's all

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • S Offline
                      S Offline
                      servant
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #40

                      Sent as PM.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • S Offline
                        S Offline
                        shuaib
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #41

                        salams idolfree,

                        If you recive no INSPIRATION (wahi) then how do you CHANGE?

                        Where does it say that you need wahi to change?

                        Wahi is knowledge that God directly communicates to His Prophets, that is all.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • T Offline
                          T Offline
                          TheNabi
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #42

                          Salaam,

                          Wahy is any indication or revelation and it is not exclusively from God.

                          Joe

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Z Offline
                            Z Offline
                            zenje
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #43

                            Wahy is any indication or revelation and it is not exclusively from God.

                            And not exclusively to prophets. )

                            Peace.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • S Offline
                              S Offline
                              shuaib
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #44

                              salams all,

                              i see the main problem here is that you have to realize that there is a linguistic context meaning and then a quranic context meaning. The linguistic meaning is a literal meaning of a word, and the Quranic meaning (of course based on the linguistic meaning) is the context and connection with which that word has been used throughout the Quran.

                              To take the word wahi, or rasool, or nabi, purely OUTSIDE the context of the Quran, take its pure linguistic meaning and then form all sorts of ideas based on that, will lead to grave misunderstandings.

                              yes in the general linguistic sense wahi can mean ANY inspiration.. but I think you all know full well that I am referring SPECIFICALLY to the direct conscious communication of knowledge that Allah can give to people of his choosing, such as the words contained in the Quran. THAT is what i meant when i said wahi.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • M Offline
                                M Offline
                                marie
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #45

                                Peace all,

                                Some receive the inspiration from the God and some receive it from the human and Jinn devils (6 112, 121)

                                1. We have permitted the enemies of every prophet, human and Jinn devils, to inspire (yoohee) in each other with fancy words in order to deceive. Had your Lord willed, they would not have done it. You shall disregard them and their fabrications.
                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • U Offline
                                  U Offline
                                  unknownuser
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #46

                                  Peace be upon you all,

                                  Yes, there are two sources of attraction that send inspiration, therefore we must always weigh evidence properly, or else "shayteen" will inspire us that sticks turn to snakes and that the God is only interested in communicating to selected exclusive individuals in the past, and only in the Middle East. D

                                  If we are not careful, we can be inspired that we are not capable of reaching a level where we can follow the EXAMPLES of the prophets.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • M Offline
                                    M Offline
                                    marie
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #47

                                    Peace,

                                    "shayteen" has any strength on us because the Reading explains itself. If we follow the explanation given inside the Reading, we cannot misunderstood the God's words.
                                    Do we need to explain the concept of salat, sawm, zakat, sujood, rukooAA...?
                                    The response is No and this is valid for each word of the Reading.

                                    Let us the God explains His words through His words D

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • F Offline
                                      F Offline
                                      Fahad1
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #48

                                      peace .
                                      two important verses that i left out of my initial post

                                      351 Praise be to Allah, the Creator of the heavens and the earth, who
                                      appointeth the angels messengers...

                                      3428 And We have not sent thee (O Muhammad) save as a bringer of
                                      good tidings and a warner unto all mankind; but most of mankind
                                      know not.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • T Offline
                                        T Offline
                                        Tay
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #49

                                        Peace All,

                                        I think 4251 sums it up nicely

                                        It is not fitting for a man that God should speak to him except by inspiration, or from behind a veil, or by the sending of a messenger to reveal, with God's permission, what God wills for He is Most High, Most Wise.

                                        Wama kana libasharin an yukallimahu Allahu illa wahyan aw min wara-i hijabin aw yursila rasoolan fayoohiya bi-ithnihi ma yashao innahu AAaliyyun hakeemun

                                        Here we see 3 ways that God communicates with man
                                        (1) Inspiration
                                        (2) From behind a veil/barrier
                                        (3) Through a messenger

                                        In my opinion, wahy through inspiration is found when we are clear of worldly thought and bias. Wahy from behind a veil/barrier is found when we witness nature. And the 3rd form of wahy is self-evident, although, I think one still needs to be free of preconceptions and wordly thought and bias to be able to pick up on this form of wahy through a messenger.

                                        Peace,
                                        Tay

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • M Offline
                                          M Offline
                                          marie
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #50

                                          Peace Tay,

                                          I think 4251 sums it up nicely

                                          Here we see 3 ways that God communicates with man
                                          (1) Inspiration
                                          (2) From behind a veil/barrier
                                          (3) Through a messenger

                                          I think the God communicated with Moses behind a non physical veil/barrier because when the God revealed Himself to the mountain, He caused it to crumble (7143)

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users