Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. Pork is HALAL

Pork is HALAL

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
354 Posts 24 Posters 36.0k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Mahdi_Ibrahim
    wrote on last edited by
    #119

    Peace Mahdi.
    You ignore the grammar of the verse 6145
    You ignore the meaning of the word "Lahm" .

    Really? Read here...

    Quote from good logic on Today at 123701 AM
    I am afraid brother, by insisting " Lahm" is flesh

    so you insist it should mean "MEAT ALONE"?

    Quote from Mahdi Ibrahim on Yesterday at 095437 PM
    nothing said it must be meat-pig or MEAT ALONE

    (Word by Word) ...and the flesh (of)
    Muhammad Asad ...and the flesh of
    M. M. Pickthall ...flesh and
    Yusuf Ali (Saudi Rev. 1985) ...and the flesh of
    Yusuf Ali (Orig. 193 ...and the flesh of
    Shakir ...and flesh of
    Wahiduddin Khan ...and the flesh of
    Dr. Laleh Bakhtiar ...and flesh of
    Safi Kaskas ...and the flesh of
    Abdul Hye ...the flesh of
    The Study Quran ...and the flesh of
    Abdul Majid Daryabadi ...flesh
    Ahmed Ali ...and the flesh of
    Ali Ünal ...and the flesh of
    Ali Quli Qara'i ...the flesh of
    Hamid S. Aziz ...and the flesh of
    Muhammad Mahmoud Ghali ...and the flesh of
    Muhammad Sarwar ...the flesh of
    Muhammad Taqi Usmani ...the flesh of
    Shabbir Ahmed ...flesh
    Syed Vickar Ahamed ...and the flesh of
    Umm Muhammad (Sahih International) ...the flesh of
    Dr. Munir Munshey ...flesh
    Dr. Kamal Omar ...and the flesh of
    Talal A. Itani (new translation) ....and the flesh of
    Maududi ....and the flesh of
    A.L. Bilal Muhammad et al (201 ...the flesh of
    Mohammad Shafi ...flesh of

    flesh

    The flesh of a fruit or vegetable is the soft, inner part.

    https//dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/flesh

    http//i66.tinypic.com/j5b2v6.jpg

    http//i64.tinypic.com/dpzuia.jpg

    not necessarily meat alone, but also to date and walnut.

    Even the Lane Lexicon said it does not apply to "MEAT ALONE"...

    it clearly said "maggoty/stinking" ... "applied" to

    (flesh) of a date
    (flesh) of a walnut

    FLESH-meat

    (FLESH (first subject matter) + MEAT (second subject matter) ... flesh and meat not the same thing)

    inconsistently...

    Quote from Mahdi Ibrahim on Yesterday at 095437 PM
    (2013 Edition) ...and the meat of pig

    Meat ALONE...

    https//scontent.fkul7-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/31218584_2090517307831516_4558380402319206920_n.jpg?_nc_cat=109&_nc_ht=scontent.fkul7-1.fna&oh=6f41b12b91c8d227bf4707416b1b42e5&oe=5CBC7556

    So what is my problem? What is there to correct? !

    https//scontent.fkul7-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/51515994_2278576255692286_1089165012905230336_n.jpg?_nc_cat=104&_nc_ht=scontent.fkul7-1.fna&oh=89603edda44036894cd40324a94152fb&oe=5CBB4488

    https//scontent.fkul7-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/51402309_2278600089023236_143549893070290944_n.jpg?_nc_cat=110&_nc_ht=scontent.fkul7-1.fna&oh=a83413d2f72c7b15168d3c0ac22bcd9f&oe=5CB5B036


    You ignore my explanation of 6146. mainly that in the context of the verses it is talking about additional items that were forbidden to The Jews only. Not everything that was forbidden to the Jews. It did not mention about blood or dead animals...etc..

    So what? Why should I bother?

    It does not change the FACT (ISSUE) that Allah does not make pork haram for the Jews...

    Did Allah forget to mention about "Pork"?

    WE MADE HARAM FOR THE JEWS ...(6146)

    Still unable to understand the issue, in my first post?

    https//i.imgur.com/Hsebp0y.jpg


    Well 6146 did not mention meat of pork either . It does not mean it is halal.

    According to you, but not the Quran.

    Quote from good logic on Today at 074758 AM
    according to your logic if Qoran does not mention it ,it is Halal.

    You who have iman! do not ask about matters which, if they were made known to you, would make things difficult for you. If you do ask about them when the Qur´an is being sent down, they will be made known to you. Allah has ignored them (pork, for the jews, and order "The FOOD OF THOSE GIVEN THE BOOK (pork) is also halal for you)". Allah is Ever-Forgiving, All-Forbearing. (5101)

    even if it is bad to eat pork, no problem... "Allah is Ever-Forgiving, All-Forbearing."(5101)

    So where is your authority from the Quran that it is haram (things Allah does not mentioned in the Quran)?

    What verse?


    You ignore that Lahm and Shahm cannot be the same in the Arabic language.

    Who said about FAT?

    You are putting an argument into my mouth..

    and I've already explained this so many times that this has nothing to do with FAT.

    https//static.abcteach.com/content_preview/p/poster_fallacy_redherring_p.jpg

    The issue is Allah mentioned nothing that pork was made haram for the Jews, it is halal to them.... and accordingly it is halal to Muslim.

    https//scontent.fkul7-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/50690202_2278403975709514_242176807636303872_n.jpg?_nc_cat=106&_nc_ht=scontent.fkul7-1.fna&oh=0bdd45171cd78ab0bd2c9daaaf8f4454&oe=5CF8CAC8


    How can you then call your take a good argument?
    And still you continue to repeat the same mistranslation. I do not know why brother.

    I have reached the stage now where I cannot take your argument seriously.
    You are flogging a dead horse, actually a "maggoty stinking dead horse".

    another blind claims and...

    Same thing, please study LOGIC.

    https//slideplayer.com/slide/9005189/27/images/46/The+ad+nauseam+fallacy+is+really+more+of+a+persuasive+tactic+rather+than+a+form+of+logic..jpg

    That is LOGIC FAILED.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • G Offline
      G Offline
      good_logic
      wrote on last edited by
      #120

      Peace Mahdi.
      Jesus was right about the "log in one s eye".
      Your AD NAUSEAM fallacy in this thread is the biggest by far and clear for all the readers to see.
      Have more of it. It is your thread.
      GOD bless you.
      Peace.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Offline
        M Offline
        Mahdi_Ibrahim
        wrote on last edited by
        #121

        Jesus was right about the "log in one s eye".

        another ad nauseam, by Jesus.

        1. By deceiving the audience into thinking that the counter objections have been dealt with (when they really have not).

        https//image.slidesharecdn.com/00bargumentationacademiclanguage6thgrade-140107232719-phpapp01/95/what-is-an-argument-a-foundation-for-ela-in-the-common-core-era-8-638.jpg?cb=1389137651

        https//creativeconflictwisdom.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/11143187_10152828270794646_8544693025519827565_n.jpg

        Why don't they research the (interpretation and translation of the) Quran? Don't they realize that if it(s interpretation and translation) was from someone other than Allah/TRUTH (falsehood), they would find many discrepancies in it. (482)

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • N Offline
          N Offline
          Noon_waalqalami
          wrote on last edited by
          #122

          peace -- topic is dumb; horrible cross-reference, logic, and translations.
          can't use pig in one verse to mean "rotten/stinky" whatever in another.

          likewise...
          lahma consists of everything including 6146 fat theirs dual
          khinziri/swine (noun) meat, fat, skin etc., see fish/bird examples

          2173 and flesh the swine
          53 and flesh the swine
          16115 and flesh the swine

          560 and the swines (compares human behavior)
          6145 flesh swine

          2259 we cover it flesh of
          2314 so cover we of the bones flesh of
          4912 that devoured flesh brother his

          1614 the sea to thou eat ye of from it flesh of
          3512 and from each thou eating flesh of (e.g. whole fish)

          2237 never reach the god flesh theirs

          5222 with fruit and flesh from what desiring

          5621 and flesh bird/fowl from what desiring (e.g. whole bird)

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Offline
            M Offline
            Mahdi_Ibrahim
            wrote on last edited by
            #123

            lahma consists of everything including 6146 شحومهما fat theirs dual
            khinziri/swine (noun) meat, fat, skin etc., see fish/bird examples

            Does that change the fact that Allah does not forbid pork for the Jews?

            Did Allah forget to mention about "Pork"?

            WE MADE HARAM FOR THE JEWS every animal with an undivided hoof, and in respect of cattle and sheep, We made their fat haram for them, except what is attached to their backs or guts or mixed up with bone. That is how We repaid them for their insolence. And WE CERTAINLY SPEAK THE TRUTH (not the Torah/Bible). (6146)

            • And the pig, because it parts the hoof and is cloven-footed but does not chew the cud, is unclean to you. You shall not eat any of their flesh, and you shall not touch their carcasses; they are unclean to you. Leviticus 117-8 ESV

            • And the pig, because it parts the hoof but does not chew the cud, is unclean for you. Their flesh you shall not eat, and their carcasses you shall not touch. Deuteronomy 148 ESV

            Accordingly

            The FOOD (flesh of swine) OF THOSE GIVEN THE BOOK is also halal for you ... anyone who rejects iman (halal foods and flesh of swine), his actions will COME TO NOTHING and in the Next World he will be among the LOSERS. (55)

            and flesh means...

            http//i66.tinypic.com/j5b2v6.jpg

            not necessarily meat alone, but also to date and walnut.

            Even the Lane Lexicon said it does not apply to "MEAT ALONE"...

            it clearly said "maggoty/stinking" ... "applied" to

            (flesh) of a date
            (flesh) of a walnut

            FLESH-meat

            (FLESH (first subject matter) + MEAT/DATE/WALNUT/FRUIT (second subject matter) ... flesh and meat not the same thing)

            flesh

            The flesh of a fruit or vegetable is the soft, inner part.

            https//dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/flesh

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • N Offline
              N Offline
              Noon_waalqalami
              wrote on last edited by
              #124

              Does that change the fact that Allah does not forbid pork to the Jews?

              what's the word for jews?
              why do you care about jews?
              what has to do with what's prohibited?

              btw, start new thread since swine flesh is prohibited period! (end of conversation!)

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M Offline
                M Offline
                Mahdi_Ibrahim
                wrote on last edited by
                #125

                what's the word for jews?
                why do you care about jews?
                what has to do with what's prohibited?

                btw, start new thread since swine flesh is prohibited period! (end of conversation!)

                Because of this...

                The FOOD (flesh of swine) OF THOSE GIVEN THE BOOK is also halal for you ... anyone who rejects iman (halal foods and flesh of swine), his actions/amal will COME TO NOTHING and in the Next World he will be among the LOSERS. (55)

                and verse 6145 (pork was prohibited???) must be consistent with verse 6146 (pork was allowed)

                Do you then believe in a part of the Book and disbelieve in the other? (285)

                so

                Does that change the fact that Allah does not forbid pork for the Jews?

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M Offline
                  M Offline
                  Mahdi_Ibrahim
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #126

                  Why don't they research the (interpretation and translation of the) Quran? Don't they realize that if it(s interpretation and translation) was from someone other than Allah/TRUTH (falsehood), they would find many discrepancies in it. (482)

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • N Offline
                    N Offline
                    Noon_waalqalami
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #127

                    Credat Judaeus Apella, non ego -- Latin for "let Apella the Jew believe, not I"

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • M Offline
                      M Offline
                      Mahdi_Ibrahim
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #128

                      Please study LOGIC.

                      https//creativeconflictwisdom.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/11143187_10152828270794646_8544693025519827565_n.jpg

                      and verse 6145 (pork was prohibited???) must be consistent with verse 6146 (pork was allowed)

                      The FOOD (flesh of swine) OF THOSE GIVEN THE BOOK is also halal for you ... anyone who rejects iman (halal foods and flesh of swine), his actions will COME TO NOTHING and in the Next World he will be among the LOSERS. (55)

                      Do you then believe in a part of the Book and disbelieve in the other? (285)

                      so

                      Does that change the fact that Allah does not forbid pork for the Jews?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • M Offline
                        M Offline
                        Mahdi_Ibrahim
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #129

                        As for those who deny Our Signs and are arrogant regarding them, the Gates of Heaven will not be opened for them, and they will not enter the Garden until a camel goes through a needle´s eye. That is how We repay the evildoers. (740)

                        On that Day, We shall ask Hell, Are you now full? Hell will answer, Are there any more? (5030)

                        wishful thinking is one thing, reality is ANOTHER.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • H Offline
                          H Offline
                          hawk99
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #130

                          Peace Mahdi Ibrahim

                          Are you and brother muslim the only two members of your group or
                          are there more members?

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • M Offline
                            M Offline
                            Mahdi_Ibrahim
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #131

                            These people of ours have taken LordLaws apart from Him/Sunnatullah/Law of Nature/EcoLogic. Why do they not produce a clear argument concerning them? (Accordingly) Who could do greater wrong than someone who invents a lie against Allah/Sunnatullah/Law of Nature/EcoLogic? (1815)

                            https//image.slidesharecdn.com/00bargumentationacademiclanguage6thgrade-140107232719-phpapp01/95/what-is-an-argument-a-foundation-for-ela-in-the-common-core-era-8-638.jpg?cb=1389137651

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • J Offline
                              J Offline
                              jkhan
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #132

                              Dear walqalami...
                              That's why I told in my earlier threads that non of laham words take the meaning other than meat... He is intentionally misguiding people... And claim he has won we are defeated.. I wonder such claimers have any proof to say so.. That's pathetic approach...
                              Anyhow I will keep expose his fallacy and twisting taking into consideration the innocent believers who may bend without pondering sometimes or with limited knowledge .....

                              Any one answer me why God called laham khinzeer (rijsz) and still ordered to eat under compulsion?... Undeniable it is the meat of swine...
                              Note carefully... In 10 places the word rijsz is occurring in entire quran.. If you read with meticulous effort you will find that rijsz is not any kind of uncleanliness coz of rotten meat. But this rijsz entirely different .this is not a word to be used when a meat is spoiled or any other edible thing is decayed but it is totally different... It's totally abomination / defilement / kind of evil which is inside hearts and naturally as such, etc... Cannot be called for example when a cat is dead and getting decayed.. O! No. Don't touch it.. It is rijsz.. No way... That's insane...
                              God called it rijsz... Coz God knew what is pork .its undeniably filthy meat that we don't perceive even it looks attractive and tasty ... But reality is different.. No need to explain what is pork it's nature... . Same as the filthy hearts never goes right ..
                              Isn't this a proof my dear members?
                              But for those who play around here to divert people nothing will be proof coz they are blind and misguided and who will guide them...
                              Pls check all rijsz verses dear believers I am sure it will help you if you use your wits. ..

                              Pork is prohibited I claim with proof and without hesitation tell everyone it's prohibited.... I am well aware verse 587...
                              God guide us...

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • M Offline
                                M Offline
                                Mahdi_Ibrahim
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #133

                                That's why I told in my earlier threads that non of laham words take the meaning other than meat... He is intentionally misguiding people...

                                all maggoty and stinking meat, fruits etc are covered by 2173, 53, 6145, 16115... it is haram. These verses refer to "flesh" (of meat and fruits etc) and NOT MEAT ALONE. ELSE you will make halal all maggoty and stinking foods other than pork since there are no verses to prohibit maggoty and stinking meat (cow, goat, chicken, rabbit, camel, horse etc) and fruits etc; refer to verse 5101. Business people could use these rotten meats and sell it to customer for profit.

                                Why don't they research the (interpretation and translation of the) Quran? Don't they realize that if it(s interpretation and translation) was from someone other than Allah/TRUTH (falsehood), they would find many discrepancies in it. (482)

                                Noun
                                (21736) walaḥma and flesh إِنَّمَا حَرَّمَ عَلَيْكُمُ الْمَيْتَةَ وَالدَّمَ وَلَحْمَ الْخِنْزِيرِ وَمَا أُهِلَّ بِهِ لِغَيْرِ اللَّهِ
                                (225956) laḥman (with) flesh وَانْظُرْ إِلَى الْعِظَامِ كَيْفَ نُنْشِزُهَا ثُمَّ نَكْسُوهَا لَحْمًا
                                (535) walaḥmu and flesh حُرِّمَتْ عَلَيْكُمُ الْمَيْتَةُ وَالدَّمُ وَلَحْمُ الْخِنْزِيرِ وَمَا أُهِلَّ لِغَيْرِ اللَّهِ بِهِ
                                (614520) laḥma (the) flesh إِلَّا أَنْ يَكُونَ مَيْتَةً أَوْ دَمًا مَسْفُوحًا أَوْ لَحْمَ خِنْزِيرٍ فَإِنَّهُ رِجْسٌ
                                (16147) laḥman meat وَهُوَ الَّذِي سَخَّرَ الْبَحْرَ لِتَأْكُلُوا مِنْهُ لَحْمًا طَرِيًّا
                                (161156) walaḥma and the flesh إِنَّمَا حَرَّمَ عَلَيْكُمُ الْمَيْتَةَ وَالدَّمَ وَلَحْمَ الْخِنْزِيرِ وَمَا أُهِلَّ لِغَيْرِ اللَّهِ بِهِ
                                (22374) luḥūmuhā their meat لَنْ يَنَالَ اللَّهَ لُحُومُهَا وَلَا دِمَاؤُهَا وَلَٰكِنْ يَنَالُهُ التَّقْوَىٰ مِنْكُمْ
                                (231413) laḥman (with) flesh فَخَلَقْنَا الْمُضْغَةَ عِظَامًا فَكَسَوْنَا الْعِظَامَ لَحْمًا
                                (351215) laḥman meat وَمِنْ كُلٍّ تَأْكُلُونَ لَحْمًا طَرِيًّا وَتَسْتَخْرِجُونَ حِلْيَةً تَلْبَسُونَهَا
                                (491222) laḥma (the) flesh أَيُحِبُّ أَحَدُكُمْ أَنْ يَأْكُلَ لَحْمَ أَخِيهِ مَيْتًا فَكَرِهْتُمُوهُ
                                (52223) walaḥmin and meat وَأَمْدَدْنَاهُمْ بِفَاكِهَةٍ وَلَحْمٍ مِمَّا يَشْتَهُونَ
                                (56211) walaḥmi And (the) flesh وَلَحْمِ طَيْرٍ مِمَّا يَشْتَهُونَ

                                (Word by Word) ...and the flesh (of)
                                Muhammad Asad ...and the flesh of
                                M. M. Pickthall ...flesh and
                                Yusuf Ali (Saudi Rev. 1985) ...and the flesh of
                                Yusuf Ali (Orig. 193 ...and the flesh of
                                Shakir ...and flesh of
                                Wahiduddin Khan ...and the flesh of
                                Dr. Laleh Bakhtiar ...and flesh of
                                Safi Kaskas ...and the flesh of
                                Abdul Hye ...the flesh of
                                The Study Quran ...and the flesh of
                                Abdul Majid Daryabadi ...flesh
                                Ahmed Ali ...and the flesh of
                                Ali Ünal ...and the flesh of
                                Ali Quli Qara'i ...the flesh of
                                Hamid S. Aziz ...and the flesh of
                                Muhammad Mahmoud Ghali ...and the flesh of
                                Muhammad Sarwar ...the flesh of
                                Muhammad Taqi Usmani ...the flesh of
                                Shabbir Ahmed ...flesh
                                Syed Vickar Ahamed ...and the flesh of
                                Umm Muhammad (Sahih International) ...the flesh of
                                Dr. Munir Munshey ...flesh
                                Dr. Kamal Omar ...and the flesh of
                                Talal A. Itani (new translation) ....and the flesh of
                                Maududi ....and the flesh of
                                A.L. Bilal Muhammad et al (201 ...the flesh of
                                Mohammad Shafi ...flesh of

                                LANE LEXICON

                                http//i66.tinypic.com/j5b2v6.jpg

                                http//i64.tinypic.com/dpzuia.jpg

                                not necessarily meat alone, but also to date and walnut.

                                Even the Lane Lexicon said it does not apply to "MEAT ALONE"...

                                it clearly said "maggoty/stinking" ... "applied" to

                                (flesh) of a date
                                (flesh) of a walnut

                                FLESH-meat

                                (FLESH (first subject matter) + MEAT / DATE / WALNET / FRUITS (second subject matter) ... flesh and meat not the same thing)

                                flesh

                                The flesh of a fruit or vegetable is the soft, inner part.

                                https//dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/flesh

                                inconsistently...

                                (2013 Edition) ...and the meat of pig

                                Meat ALONE...

                                Why do they not produce a clear argument concerning them? (Accordingly) Who could do greater wrong than someone who invents a lie against Allah/Sunnatullah/Law of Nature/EcoLogic? (1815)

                                https//scontent.fkul1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/51402309_2278600089023236_143549893070290944_n.jpg?_nc_cat=110&_nc_ht=scontent.fkul1-1.fna&oh=2dc7da343d86c41a493a185cc5776aab&oe=5CB5B036

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • H Offline
                                  H Offline
                                  hawk99
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #134

                                  Peace Mahdi Ibrahim

                                  Are you and brother muslim the only two members of your group or
                                  are there more members?

                                  https//tse3.mm.bing.net/th?id=OIP.b9agb-TxYdHF_xRouw--mQHaF5&pid=15.1&P=0&w=300&h=300

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • J Offline
                                    J Offline
                                    jkhan
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #135

                                    all maggoty and stinking meat, fruits etc are covered by 2173, 53, 6145, 16115... it is haram. These verses refer to "flesh" (of meat and fruits etc) and NOT MEAT ALONE. ELSE you will make halal all maggoty and stinking foods other than pork since there are no verses to prohibit maggoty and stinking meat (cow, goat, chicken, rabbit, camel, horse etc)

                                    Now is this the last resort for you to approach for your wavering claim .... Just look at that... So you have come to a point haplessly to say that God has not explained prohibition for food that are decayed.. so you took the meaning of laham kyinzeer to adjust = Flesh/meat of any edible matter which is rotten....
                                    Dude in basic 04 prohibited things God of course didn't say decayed food, is it really necessary to say like addressing to fools... No... but still God used the word in 2168 "O men! eat the LAWFUL and GOOD THINGS out of what is in the earth, and do not follow the footsteps of the Shaitan; surely he is your open enemy."

                                    don't you use your wits Mahdi.... or you follow the steps of satan... God crystal clearly saying Eat what is GOOD... but prohibition is given in simple language by not complicating the reader... if God happen to bring all the animals and say this one is lawful and that one is unlawful, this book will become only Prohibition of Foods... Just insanity at its best...
                                    Compare the quran and find out what suits best... that's intelligence.. rather than posting posters after posters of meats here.. The below verse you posted many times... i wonder you even pondered what it says... Coz you have not researched but remained in your view and adjusted quran to your taste..

                                    Why don't they research the (interpretation and translation of the) Quran? Don't they realize that if it(s interpretation and translation) was from someone other than Allah/TRUTH (falsehood), they would find many discrepancies in it. (482)

                                    O Man.... in the basic prohibition verses of quran it includes everything... but you failed to grasp....suppose you are claiming if khinzeeer is not rotten meat, then God failed to explain such decay items prohibition, question is did God, explain to you as Kaltun raised the prohibition of Human meat (cannibalization)... Strongly NO.. but somehow if you are against it, then you would have compared quran from other verses.. next Has God given prohibition in those basic four not to consume Poison? No.. So can you claim it is not prohibited so consume..or you use your knowledge and compare quran....

                                    God knows what people will like to eat though almost all foods are lawful...just to simplify God used simple way of explanation...I don't need to convince you but i am writing these things so that intelligent would not get trapped to ignorance....
                                    God guide us...

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • J Offline
                                      J Offline
                                      jkhan
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #136

                                      Hi....
                                      Videos are not necessary to prove QURAN but still information and communication is key for human...
                                      So pls watch below links ... You all know worldwide what erudite has to say about pigs... It's no wonder...

                                      https//youtu.be/Excuups8GtQ

                                      https//youtu.be/wYR3GYsMtds

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • M Offline
                                        M Offline
                                        Mahdi_Ibrahim
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #137

                                        God has not explained prohibition for food that are decayed.. so you took the meaning of laham kyinzeer to adjust = Flesh/meat of any edible matter which is rotten....

                                        you're so desperate; ALL .. yes

                                        read the above, and what Lexicon said about the following word

                                        http//i66.tinypic.com/j5b2v6.jpg

                                        so what is your answer to the above issue?

                                        Does Allah really say "MEAT ALONE" or it is just you?

                                        https//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9610488.msg421592#msg421592

                                        https//scontent.fkul1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/51515994_2278576255692286_1089165012905230336_n.jpg?_nc_cat=104&_nc_ht=scontent.fkul1-1.fna&oh=5cb7738a9b8149b541e7544ad8360e4c&oe=5CBB4488

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • M Offline
                                          M Offline
                                          Mahdi_Ibrahim
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #138

                                          So pls watch below links ... You all know worldwide what erudite has to say about pigs... It's no wonder...

                                          https//youtu.be/Excuups8GtQ

                                          https//youtu.be/wYR3GYsMtds

                                          Irrelevant.

                                          You who have iman! do not ask about matters which, if they were made known to you, would make things difficult for you. If you do ask about them when the Qur´an is being sent down, they will be made known to you. Allah has ignored them (pork, for the jews, and order "The FOOD OF THOSE GIVEN THE BOOK (pork) is also halal for you)". Allah is Ever-Forgiving, All-Forbearing. (5101)

                                          even if it is bad to eat pork, no problem... "Allah is Ever-Forgiving, All-Forbearing."(5101)

                                          It may be that you hate something when it is good for you and it may be that you love something when it is bad for you. Allah knows and you do not know. (2216)

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users