Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. Science / History / Prophecy
  3. Archeology & History
  4. Petra is the Holy City of Islam

Petra is the Holy City of Islam

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Archeology & History
73 Posts 21 Posters 3.4k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    good_logic
    wrote on last edited by
    #51

    Peace jafar.
    636 BC? Or this?

    http//www.answers.com/Q/Why_Was_Petra_abandoned

    History is vague and weird ! Hard to know. I wonder when consistency of historical facts started? I mean we know for sure about the consistency and truthfulness of the history of the last 200 years or do we?

    GOD bless you.
    Peace.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • K Offline
      K Offline
      kaltun
      wrote on last edited by
      #52

      SLM Good logic,

      I wonder when consistency of historical facts started? I mean we know for sure about the consistency and truthfulness of the history of the last 200 years or do we?

      honestly i think we dont know if its true or not ( i think we are brainwashed) .... i also think even that last 100 year are / were evil for the mankind ( and still going )

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • S Offline
        S Offline
        si_di
        wrote on last edited by
        #53

        Mecca,Medina,Jerusalem,Damascus why you want to find out which place is the holy City?

        the earth itself is the holy City of Islam,its unique in the universe.

        peace

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • G Offline
          G Offline
          good_logic
          wrote on last edited by
          #54

          Yes, thank you kaltun.
          I agree with you.
          A good job history has nothing to do with our salvation.
          I mean how many people give different narrations on the same story .
          Any story can never be told consistently by different people, each person gives their own twist on parts of it until it becomes a fable or legend.
          GOD bless you.
          Peace.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • S Offline
            S Offline
            si_di
            wrote on last edited by
            #55

            @Phil

            The story of seven sleepers has a common similarity with the story of Pleiades as told in various cultures in antiquity.
            https//en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pleiades

            And what/where should the "masjid" build over them be/represent?

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • J Offline
              J Offline
              Jafar
              wrote on last edited by
              #56

              Peace jafar.
              636 BC? Or this?

              http//www.answers.com/Q/Why_Was_Petra_abandoned

              History is vague and weird ! Hard to know. I wonder when consistency of historical facts started? I mean we know for sure about the consistency and truthfulness of the history of the last 200 years or do we?

              "The last inhabitants left the city in 663 when the Arabs conquered the area."

              Interesting... why did the inhabitants abandoned the city in 663?
              And which Arabs? Given the Nabateans are Arabs themselves.. at least that's how the Roman calls them..

              Regardless of who the invader were, it's unnatural for population to abandon a city, given much effort has been made to such wonderful city.
              Petra and surrounding area has been invaded many times before, by Macedonians, Romans, Persian, Byzantium.
              None resulted in abandonment of the city as for the conqueror it's more beneficial to have a thriving population center which shall produce more tax revenue for them.

              Unless the invasion was 100% politically motivated.. and the conqueror doesn't seek tax revenue from it's inhabitants but total annihilation.

              Mecca,Medina,Jerusalem,Damascus why you want to find out which place is the holy City?

              I'm not interested to find the holy city of Islam or any other cult / sect / religion for that matter..
              I'm curious about this unique settlement of Petra..

              story can never be told consistently by different people, each person gives their own twist on parts of it until it becomes a fable or legend.

              Of course, and that's natural... that's why there is a need to listened to everyone side of the story. (reminding me of an old Phil Collins song)
              And the most popular / official (hi)story usually were written by the winner / the side who were more powerful politically.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • I Offline
                I Offline
                Incognito 0
                wrote on last edited by
                #57

                Interesting... why did the inhabitants abandoned the city in 663?
                And which Arabs? Given the Nabateans are Arabs themselves.. at least that's how the Roman calls them..

                I don't think it was a sudden abandonment but rather a gradual decline after earthquakes in 363 and then 551 crippled the city.

                Interestingly Dan Gibson in this interview talks about how he first came across the Petra theory when someone from the Muslim "free thinkers" website contacted him. So I think it was actually free-minds that spawned the theory p

                https//youtu.be/7M9g7HHjRRA

                To be honest I'm not sure of how important the discussion as to the "holy city of Islam" is; guess it would depend upon ones own reading of the Qur'an and understanding of concepts such as Hajj and masjid Al haram.

                But it's an interesting hypothesis and Petra truly is a fascinating place. Im not sure if I'm convinced of the Petra theory and I'm not sure we'll ever know the truth to be honest.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • J Offline
                  J Offline
                  jkhan
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #58

                  Peace....
                  Even when I was reading quran I knew long back that masjid Al Haram or Kaaba or whatever holiplaces mentioned QURAN is not current Day Macca....
                  Let me turn to topic.... Whether it is Petra or not but definitely not Macca the current one....
                  After all what is the importance for us the masjid Al haram.... Not at all in my belief... Quran addresses the people of the past and people it was revealed I mean the community of Mohamed be it Arabs or the people of the book and Quran address commonly to entire human and jinn regardless of when and where they are living.... Haj and masjid Haram is totally irrelevant to me....
                  BTW the prophet Mohamed definitely lived in close proximity to isreal and where Lot lived and current Day Petra is much close to the truth.... After all it has only historical values... Nothing to do with our salvation.....
                  God guide us...

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • K Offline
                    K Offline
                    kaltun
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #59

                    SLM to all,

                    here an interesting fact
                    Petra is one of the world's most famous historical archeological sites. Thought to have been established in 312 BCE, Petra was located at a junction that China, India, Egypt, Greece, Rome, Syria and southern Arabia used for trading spices and silk, among other products. Also noteworthy is that this city had a water conduit system that provided water for 30,000 inhabitants and even allowed for gardens in the desert. To this day, only 15% of Petra has been explored.

                    more logical than laying 1400 km further aka Mecca...
                    tell me what is logial picture A
                    https//cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/535398007743709216/544810337174552576/unknown.png
                    or

                    picture b
                    https//cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/535398007743709216/544811422786256898/unknown.png

                    see the distance between them

                    https//cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/535398007743709216/544813161069674499/unknown.png

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • J Offline
                      J Offline
                      Jafar
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #60

                      SLM to all,

                      here an interesting fact
                      Petra is one of the world's most famous historical archeological sites. Thought to have been established in 312 BCE, Petra was located at a junction that China, India, Egypt, Greece, Rome, Syria and southern Arabia used for trading spices and silk, among other products. Also noteworthy is that this city had a water conduit system that provided water for 30,000 inhabitants and even allowed for gardens in the desert. To this day, only 15% of Petra has been explored.

                      Correct.
                      And also the findings of ancient temple remains with idol / deity names which matched the names being described in Quran. (ie Allat, Manat, Hubal, Uzza and friends).
                      https//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nabataean_religion

                      more logical than laying 1400 km further aka Mecca...
                      picture b
                      https//cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/535398007743709216/544811422786256898/unknown.png

                      A minor correction on the picture below.
                      The ancient trade route linking Europe to (Far East) Asia, also known as "String of Pearls" in Chinese, does not travel overland through Mecca or Medina.
                      Instead it travel through Sea...
                      From the gulf of Aden, through the red sea and branches off to "Aqaba" port in today's Jordan and traversed overland to Petra->Gaza->Jerusalem->Damascus and "Mios Hormos" port in Egypt.

                      This was the during the time when there were no Suez canal.
                      The evidence can still be clearly seen as of today.
                      Today's sea trade route is still similar, but with majority of the trade goes through the suez canal.

                      https//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/ff/Periplous_of_the_Erythraean_Sea.svg/800px-Periplous_of_the_Erythraean_Sea.svg.png
                      Ancient East-West trade routes (1st century AD)

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • A Offline
                        A Offline
                        Abaddon
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #61

                        Did the reconstruction of the fake kaaba/mecca actually happened after Hussein got murdered? Is it possible that those responsible for his death are also responsible for this great deception?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • A Offline
                          A Offline
                          Abaddon
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #62

                          Hussein Grandson of the Prophet.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • J Offline
                            J Offline
                            jkhan
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #63

                            Peace....
                            Even when I was reading quran I knew long back that masjid Al Haram or Kaaba or whatever holiplaces mentioned QURAN is not current Day Macca....
                            Let me turn to topic.... Whether it is Petra or not but definitely not Macca the current one....
                            After all what is the importance for us the masjid Al haram.... Not at all in my belief... Quran addresses the people of the past and people it was revealed I mean the community of Mohamed be it Arabs or the people of the book and Quran address commonly to entire human and jinn regardless of when and where they are living.... Haj and masjid Haram is totally irrelevant to me....
                            BTW the prophet Mohamed definitely lived in close proximity to isreal and where Lot lived and current Day Petra is much close to the truth.... After all it has only historical values... Nothing to do with our salvation.....
                            God guide us...

                            Peace Everyone...

                            We can take the below verse also to support that Israel is so close proximity to where Mohamed lived...

                            2211 "Ask the Children of Israel how many a clear sign We gave them. Whoso changes God's blessing after it has come to him, God is terrible in retribution."

                            Where is Makka and Israel to ASK from the CHILDREN of ISRAEL... not at all ..... If PETRA then that is very reasonable if Israel was in fact not only the current day areas of Israel..which should be extended up to the borders of Petra and where Lut lived...
                            May God guide us..

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • A Offline
                              A Offline
                              Abaddon
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #64

                              Here is something from another source. Flavius Josephus a roman-israelite historian wrote a lot about Petra in his chronics about the Roman conquest of Judea

                              And when he had predisposed them both to do what he would have them, he took Hyrcanus by night, and ran away from the city, and, continuing his flight with great swiftness, he escaped to the place called Petra, which is the royal seat of the king of Arabia, where he put Hyrcanus into Aretas's hand; and by discoursing much with him, and gaining upon him with many presents, he prevailed with him to give him an army that might restore him to his kingdom.

                              • Flavius Josephus The Wars of the Jews / Chapter 6 - 2nd passage
                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • J Offline
                                J Offline
                                jkhan
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #65

                                Peace all..

                                2122 “O Children of Israel, remember My favor which I have bestowed upon you and that I preferred you over the worlds.”
                                Can anyone say that Quran doesn’t address the Children of Isreal… Does God ever address any community except Isreal… Adam is different.. Simply like “ O! children of Misr .. etc”.. I didn’t find, correct me if so…
                                Calling the entire human and specifically calling Isreal has a huge difference… it shows that this quran is directly addressing the Israelite… There is no point if they were not living close proximity mingling with the community of Mohamed.

                                26197 “And has it not been a sign to them that it is recognized by the scholars of the Children of Israel?”
                                What this verse says….honestly, God wouldn’t have said this unless the people of Muhamed and Children of Israel are close proximity and each other knew their each others language to a great extent..

                                What about this..
                                2776 “ Indeed, this Qur'an relates to the Children of Israel most of that over which they disagree.”
                                Ponder my dear people… you can get a lot to support that makka has no relation with Muhamed…
                                616 And when Jesus, the son of Mary, said, "O children of Israel, indeed I am the messenger of Allah to you confirming what came before me of the Torah and bringing good tidings of a messenger to come after me, whose name is Ahmad." But when he came to them with clear evidences, they said, "This is obvious magic."
                                Give thoughts…

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • J Offline
                                  J Offline
                                  jkhan
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #66

                                  Peace all..

                                  2122 “O Children of Israel, remember My favor which I have bestowed upon you and that I preferred you over the worlds.”
                                  Can anyone say that Quran doesn’t address the Children of Isreal… Does God ever address any community except Isreal… Adam is different.. Simply like “ O! children of Misr .. etc”.. I didn’t find, correct me if so…
                                  Calling the entire human and specifically calling Isreal has a huge difference… it shows that this quran is directly addressing the Israelite… There is no point if they were not living close proximity mingling with the community of Mohamed.

                                  26197 “And has it not been a sign to them that it is recognized by the scholars of the Children of Israel?”
                                  What this verse says….honestly, God wouldn’t have said this unless the people of Muhamed and Children of Israel are close proximity and each other knew their each others language to a great extent..

                                  What about this..
                                  2776 “ Indeed, this Qur'an relates to the Children of Israel most of that over which they disagree.”
                                  Ponder my dear people… you can get a lot to support that makka has no relation with Muhamed…
                                  616 And when Jesus, the son of Mary, said, "O children of Israel, indeed I am the messenger of Allah to you confirming what came before me of the Torah and bringing good tidings of a messenger to come after me, whose name is Ahmad." But when he came to them with clear evidences, they said, "This is obvious magic."
                                  Give thoughts…

                                  For me very interesting the verses which involves Israel to presume where actually Mohamed would have lived.... I suggest to everyone to take all israel verses and explore in your own way ...
                                  God guide us...

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • S Offline
                                    S Offline
                                    Sweetflower87
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #67

                                    Peace to everyone,

                                    I agree that the information Dan Gibson has provided in his book 'Early Islamic Qiblahs' is very fascinating.

                                    I think people should have a visit there. It truly is an amazing city. If anyone is interested to discover the secrets of that place, there is really no better way than doing it outside with the local bedouin people.
                                    It happens to be that I have made a trip to Petra and I recommend this beautiful accommadtion called Why not Bedouin home? You may find the link on booking https//www.booking.com/hotel/jo/why-not-bedouin-home.nl.html

                                    Should anyone feel the need of contacting me about it, feel free to do so via PM.

                                    Peace,
                                    SweetFlower87

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • WakasW Offline
                                      WakasW Offline
                                      Wakas
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #68

                                      https//muslimheritage.com/pibla-back-to-qibla/

                                      Preliminary note Dan Gibson’s new book claims to turn upside down all of what we know about one aspect of early Islamic practice, namely, the sacred direction (qibla) toward the Kaaba in Makka. He believes that Islam began in Petra, not Makka, and that the focus of Muslim prayer for the first two centuries was toward Petra, not Makka. As evidence for this he attempts to show that dozens of early mosques face Petra with remarkable accuracy. Since his revolutionary ideas ignore what modern scholarship has established about the early qibla, I present an overview of how things actually were. I then show how Gibson has misunderstood most of the data at his disposal, comparing medieval mosque orientations with modern directions of Petra and Makka, and why his interpretation is completely flawed. In brief, he has wrought havoc with information that he cannot master, and has – wittingly or unwittingly – produced an amateurish, non-scholarly document that is both offensive to Muslims and also an insult to Muslim and Western scholarship. None of the mosques investigated by Gibson has anything to do with Petra. Nor, indeed, has early Islam.

                                      All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • T Offline
                                        T Offline
                                        tutti_frutti
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #69

                                        salam wakas

                                        hope you are well

                                        mais i ask you, where do you think is the holy land or location of Sacred Mosque and which of the temples is the actual Sacred Mosque?

                                        peace

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • WakasW Offline
                                          WakasW Offline
                                          Wakas
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #70

                                          salam wakas

                                          hope you are well

                                          mais i ask you, where do you think is the holy land or location of Sacred Mosque and which of the temples is the actual Sacred Mosque?

                                          peace

                                          http//mypercept.co.uk/articles/meaning-masjid-al-haram-Quran.html

                                          In terms of specific location I think Quran is vague on purpose so as not to allow for veneration of a specific location or building etc. I discuss this in the article above. Also here
                                          http//mypercept.co.uk/articles/meaning-hajj-Quran.html

                                          All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users