Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. Hoors?!?

Hoors?!?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
96 Posts 15 Posters 2.1k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    Samia
    wrote on last edited by
    #81

    Salaam JM

    because in Arabic the adjective is always placed after the noun.

    I wouldn't say "always". There's what we call an "adjectival idafa", as in "rajulun jameelul wajhi; imra'atun jameelatul wajhi (beautiful face "m" and "f&quot, but the adjective here, although describes the face, but it conforms with the characteristics of the person whose face is beautiful (gender, number...)

    Another example is the case of a predicate preceding the subject as in jameelun wajhuhu (his face is beautiful) and jameelun wajhuha (her face is beautiful).

    But I do not think either kind apply to the phrase (huurun 3een).

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • W Offline
      W Offline
      wildguest1956
      wrote on last edited by
      #82

      Salaam all

      The word is "3een", not "3ain". This expression "7uur 3een" is restricted to the quraan. It's not mentioned in any dictionary.

      I believe that both words are adjectives to a missing word. Since verses of the quraan on paradise mention nature (rivers, fruits, trees..), it could be a description for these rivers which are pure and "abundant with water" (3een could be derived from the noun "3ain spring of water) 7uur 3een "rivers" pure and abundant with water.

      Peace Samia,

      Why do you think they are both adjectives?
      And not both nouns for example ?

      Are there many missing words in the Quran?

      peace

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • S Offline
        S Offline
        Samia
        wrote on last edited by
        #83

        Salaam JM

        Why do you think they are both adjectives?
        And not both nouns for example ?

        I take "7uur" as adjective, plural of "a7war". An adjective can be followed by a noun if it is definite (as I mentioned above a delayed subject). Since 3een is indefinite, I can only see it as another adjective, both describing something (maybe the gardens?!! "jannaat&quot

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • R Offline
          R Offline
          Raj-ah
          wrote on last edited by
          #84

          Peace raj-ah

          and i'm not your dear, except may be deer (inside joke)

          You may not be my dear, but you are dear to me

          You're right in the first part of ur sentence (green) but not the second. Read my answer right i said ready to leave this islam, which means islam interpreted this way, which i already left actually and never managed to adhere to before anyway. See i'm frank with u and accept your criticism. As to my ego being clearly depicted - this is easy to say and i could tell u exactly the same. Or do u believe to be above ?

          This Islam..... which doesnot suit your thoughts? your understanding?
          Some one here says; He can drink wine because Quran does not clearly prohibits it, according to his understanding
          Well that is his ISlam
          Some one here says there is no Jannah and that is his Islam?
          Mullah says we get 72 virgins as a reward that is their Islam?
          His, her, theirs, ours Islam.......
          I have no problem with that at all, Religon and Deen are two different things and to me what is important is Deen, but Turning and Moulding Quran according to one's own thought is a issue which is debate able.

          Hoor; according to all the facts gathered and history study guides us to beautiful Women weather you like it or not,...............and if Quran read with just mind the word could be for Men and Women both.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • R Offline
            R Offline
            Raj-ah
            wrote on last edited by
            #85

            Peace raj-ah,

            Please clarify. Eternal bliss makes no point, but 72 virgins does? I'm not sure what your position is.

            Peace,
            Tay

            Salaam to u too

            When I first joined this forum and had a conversation with FAhad(Salahudin) and masadi, I got a impression that people here at FM are bit impressed by westeren media and are equally rigid as a Sunni or Shia in their beliefs and that is up to some extent true.

            Perfect happines is = boredom. As Iqbal of India said it while talking to Malaika"Tu Kia teri Auqaat Kia fiqt Allah hoo Allah Hoo"
            If you have read even some of my posts you would have known that I am no advocate of 72 virgins.
            Where do you got 72 virgins? The Virgin is not exact transaltion of Arabic word Hur. Moreover
            It is no where in Quran?? or is It?
            Ah! so you got it from media that a Muslim who will be martyred get 72 virgins in paradise, imean to say that is what is propogated.
            Muslims the Sunni Muslims are the largest sect under umbrella of Islam
            They believe in HAdith more than Quran and to them Imam Bukhari is almost equivalent to Prophet...
            let us see what do they have to say about this

            Narrated Abu Huraira The Prophet said, "The first batch (of people) who will enter paradise will be (glittering) like the full moon, and the batch next to them will be (glittering) like the most brilliant star in the sky. Their hearts will be as if the heart of a single man, for they will have neither enmity nor jealousy amongst themselves; everyone will have two wives from the houris, (who will be so beautiful, pure and transparent that) the marrow of the bones of their legs will be seen through the bones and the flesh." (Sahih Bukhari, Book 54 "The Beginning of Creation", Hadith 476)

            72 ????? I donot see any 72 in it? I will wait for you and will keep on waiting until you bring a HAdith from Bukhari which mentions 72 virgins.

            What do Shia has to say about it?
            What do Ahmedi's say about it?

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • T Offline
              T Offline
              Tay
              wrote on last edited by
              #86

              Peace Raj-ah,

              Chill bro, I just wasn't clear on what you were saying.

              Peace,
              Tay

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • W Offline
                W Offline
                wildguest1956
                wrote on last edited by
                #87

                Salaam JM

                I take "7uur" as adjective, plural of "a7war". An adjective can be followed by a noun if it is definite (as I mentioned above a delayed subject). Since 3een is indefinite, I can only see it as another adjective, both describing something (maybe the gardens?!! "jannaat&quot

                OK, but why do you not take "7uur" as a noun ?

                Anyway, thanks for your responses, it was interesting.

                A question I would like to ask you Why have you never written an article for FM ?

                Peace

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • S Offline
                  S Offline
                  Samia
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #88

                  Salaam JM

                  Because I know it's plural. The singular is an adjective. The noun is "7awar" whitness; "purity".

                  A question I would like to ask you Why have you never written an article for FM ?

                  I am a teacher talk a lot, write a little, and a translator rewrite what others wrote...in a different language ;D.

                  But who knows...

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • W Offline
                    W Offline
                    wildguest1956
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #89

                    OK, but why do you not take "7uur" as a noun ?

                    Because I know it's plural. The singular is an adjective. The noun is "7awar" whitness; "purity".

                    Peace Samia

                    I am sorry, but I don?t get it.

                    Here is the comment of Asad

                    The noun hur - rendered by me as "companions pure" - is a plural of both ahwar (masc.) and hawra (fem.), either of which describes "a person distinguished by hawar", which latter term primarily denotes "intense whiteness of the eyeballs and lustrous black of the iris" (Qamus). In a more general sense, hawar signifies simply "whiteness" (Asas) or, as a moral qualification, "purity" (cf. Tabari, Razi and Ibn Kathir in their explanations of the term hawariyyun in 352).
                    Hence, the compound expression hurin signifies, approximately, "pure beings , most beautiful of eye" (which latter is the meaning of in, the plural of ayan).
                    http//www.islamawakened.com/Quran/56/22/default.htm

                    So, according to him,

                    • hur is a noun, it is a plural of another noun ahwar / hawra
                    • in is a noun too, plural of ayan (eye / spring)

                    What do you think of that ?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • S Offline
                      S Offline
                      Samia
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #90

                      Quote
                      The noun hur - rendered by me as "companions pure" - is a plural of both ahwar (masc.) and hawra (fem.), either of which describes "a person distinguished by hawar", which latter term primarily denotes "intense whiteness of the eyeballs and lustrous black of the iris" (Qamus). In a more general sense, hawar signifies simply "whiteness" (Asas) or, as a moral qualification, "purity" (cf. Tabari, Razi and Ibn Kathir in their explanations of the term hawariyyun in 352).
                      Hence, the compound expression hurin signifies, approximately, "pure beings , most beautiful of eye" (which latter is the meaning of in, the plural of ayan).
                      http//www.islamawakened.com/Quran/56/22/default.htm

                      So, according to him,

                      • hur is a noun, it is a plural of another noun ahwar / hawra
                      • in is a noun too, plural of ayan (eye / spring)

                      What do you think of that ?

                      Salaam JM

                      I think you allude to his expression
                      The noun hur - rendered by me as "companions pure"
                      . This could be just an error, or maybe he is thinking in Arabic, because adjectives are not a class of their own in Arabic, but are classified as "nouns". The second part of his statement "compabions pure" show he understands it as an adjective. It is like saying "a white" meaning " a white person". Hawar is the noun.

                      As for 3een, the pattern shows that it is not the plural pf 3ain (either meaning). Their plural is 3uyuun, a3yun (only for eyes). Another plural of this pattern is the pattern of af3aal a3yaan, which means prominent people as in Majlisul a3yaan Senate (for example). 3een sounds like the plural of words of the pattern "af3al", mainly for colours. Example abyad beed. So t might be the plural of a3yan.

                      Maybe 3een is the correct plural for "prominent people". We do not have the singular of a3yaan . Perhaps it is a3yan , and that the plural a3yaan is wrong and it shoul be 3een!!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • W Offline
                        W Offline
                        wildguest1956
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #91

                        Peace Samia,
                        More than 3 years later, is there something new in your understanding ?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • W Offline
                          W Offline
                          WayFinder
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #92

                          Peace Samia,
                          More than 3 years later, is there something new in your understanding ?

                          Do you happen to read a book titled ...?

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • R Offline
                            R Offline
                            Raaajah
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #93

                            Way Finder

                            Do you happen to read a book titled ...?

                            Have you happen to read the thread, (you brought back some old memories), I think JM is fellow who does his home work before posting.

                            Posted on February 01, 2007, 121635 PM
                            Posted by tanveermd
                            tanveermd

                            Aramaic and Nabataean are not an ancestor to Classical Arabic. Arabic descended from Safaitic. The Safaitic language is very similar to other North Arabian dialects such as Thamudic and Lihyanite. Once again, Arabic and all those languages are in the Southern Semitic branch (which includes Southern Arabic, Northern Arabic, and Ethiopic). This is a different class of languages than Aramaic and Nabataean, which are part of the Western Semitic branch.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • W Offline
                              W Offline
                              WayFinder
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #94

                              Way Finder
                              Have you happen to read the thread, (you brought back some old memories), I think JM is fellow who does his home work before posting.

                              Posted on February 01, 2007, 121635 PM
                              Posted by tanveermd
                              tanveermd

                              Peace,

                              I was talking about 1 particular book... did he read it? I think it is better for him to reply...

                              However, let me inform you that you are right and I did not read the thread...except a few post... this is why I just asked a straight forward question rather than bringing a topic for discussion...

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • WakasW Offline
                                WakasW Offline
                                Wakas
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #95

                                Do you happen to read a book titled ...?

                                Has anyone here actually read this book? If so, does it use word cross-referencing within Al Quran? From the excerpts I have seen it was poor.

                                All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • W Offline
                                  W Offline
                                  WayFinder
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #96

                                  Has anyone here actually read this book? If so, does it use word cross-referencing within Al Quran? From the excerpts I have seen it was poor.

                                  I read part of it... and you are right about the cross referencing... the author just tries to reconvert the arabic back to syro-aramaic in order to explain some passages... I tend to think he is right at times... regarding Hoors... he says that it means 'grapes'... does not mean that i accept it, but still an avenue to explore.. it is an interesting read... but it is bulky. There are many many terms in Quran borrowed directly from the other languages and written in arabic... such as the proper names for example... one cannot get the true meaning behind the name itself from the arabic... such as Isa... has to switch back to the syro-aramaic... just an example.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  Reply
                                  • Reply as topic
                                  Log in to reply
                                  • Oldest to Newest
                                  • Newest to Oldest
                                  • Most Votes


                                  • Login

                                  • Don't have an account? Register

                                  • Login or register to search.
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  0
                                  • Categories
                                  • Recent
                                  • Users