Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. Inheritance according to Qur?an

Inheritance according to Qur?an

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
1.0k Posts 45 Posters 168.2k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Mazhar
    wrote on last edited by
    #205

    You confusing verses addressing plural three or more, saying two is not applicable or possible is ridiculous!
    We need only find case anywhere in the world two heirs to prove your nonsense incorrect reading of verse.

    411 ... and heirs person?s parents (if only parents) so to his mother the third

    You are done! Only two heirs mentioned!

    What an evidence!!! Only one third, who will get the remaining two third?

    Now again read the verdict of Allah the Exalted and ask your nephew if he knows Arabic to make you understand.

    If he knows even elementary Arabic, he might tell you something about that this indefinite noun knows no exception in all the population of the world.

    Every person with no exception has plural--three and above.

    Why are you defying the declarative statement of Allah the Exalted only to stick to your nonsense matehmatical gimmicks?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • N Offline
      N Offline
      Noon_waalqalami
      wrote on last edited by
      #206

      What an evidence!!! Only one third, who will get the remaining two third?

      You're babbling!

      Only idiots will not understand if two people and if one gets 1/3 the other gets remaining 2/3!

      How you can insert Allah in your every other post to such nonsense and stupidity is obscene!

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • N Offline
        N Offline
        Noon_waalqalami
        wrote on last edited by
        #207

        Thread is distributing shares according to Qur'an; either provide alternative distributions or stop spamming!

        Here are all combinations for reference; obviously sole inheritor gets the whole, no need for arbitration laws.

        411 directs you The God in your children to the male like share the two (feminine)...

        son/s + daughter/s distribute at 21 ratio male to female = 1

        411 ... so if kunna/are nisa above two falahunna/so to them (feminine plural) thulutha (2/3) what left

        and if kanat/is (feminine) one so to her the half

        and to their parents to each one from them the sixth from what left if kana/is (masculine) to person walad/son (if male child/born)

        so if not was to person waladun/offspring/child born and heirs person?s parents (if only parents) so to his mother the third

        so if kana/is (masculine singular) to person ikh'wat (if male sibling/brother) so to his mother the sixth

        from after a will have made in it or judgment your fathers and your children not you know which of them closer to you benefit obligation from The God indeed The God is Knowing Wise

        1 father + 0 sibling/s = 1

        1/3 mother + 2/3 father = 1
        1/6 mother + 5/6 brother/s = 1

        1/6 mother/father + 5/6 son/s = 1
        1/6 mother + 1/6 father + 2/3 son/s = 1

        1 daughter 1/2 + 1/2 mother/father = 1
        2 daughters + mother/father equally = 1
        3 daughters 2/3 + 1/3 mother/father = 1

        1 daughter 1/2 + 1/4 mother + 1/4 father = 1
        2 daughters + mother + father all equally = 1
        3 daughters 2/3 + 1/6 mother + 1/6 father = 1

        1/6 mother/father + 5/6 (daughter/s + son/s) 21 ratio male to female = 1

        411 kalalah fatherless and spouseless no son (sibling/s variable/unstated)
        1 daughter 1/2 + 1/2 (mother + sister/s) = 1
        1 daughter 1/2 + 1/6 mother + 1/3 brother/s = 1
        1 daughter 1/2 + 1/6 mother + 1/3 (sister/s + brother/s) = 1

        2 daughters + mother + sister/s (all share equally) = 1
        2 daughters + brother/s 5/6 share equally + 1/6 mother = 1
        2 daughters + brother/s + sister/s 5/6 share equally + 1/6 mother = 1

        3 daughters 2/3 + 1/3 (mother + sister/s) = 1
        3 daughters 2/3 + 1/6 mother + 1/6 brother/s = 1
        3 daughters 2/3 + 1/6 mother + 1/6 (sister/s + brother/s) = 1

        1 daughter 1/2 + 1/2 sister/s = 1
        1 daughter 1/2 + 1/2 brother/s = 1
        1 daughter 1/2 + 1/2 (sister/s + brother/s) = 1

        2 daughters + sister/s = 1
        2 daughters + brother/s = 1
        2 daughters + sister/s + brother/s = 1

        3 daughters 2/3 + 1/3 sister/s = 1
        3 daughters 2/3 + 1/3 brother/s = 1
        3 daughters 2/3 + 1/3 (sister/s + brother/s) = 1

        412 and to you half what left your spouse?s if not was to them waladun/offspring/child

        so if kana is (masculine) to them walad/son (if is male child/born) so to you the fourth

        from what they left from after a will they made in it or judgment

        and to them the fourth from what you left if not was to you waladun/offspring/child

        so if kana is (masculine) to you walad/son (i.e. if to person male child/born) falahunna/so to them the eight

        from what you left from after a will you made in it or judgment...

        1 spouse + 0 sibling/s = 1

        1/4 husband + 3/4 son/s = 1
        1/8 wife + 7/8 son/s = 1

        1 daughter 1/2 + 1/2 spouse = 1
        2 daughters + spouse equally = 1
        3 daughters 2/3 + 1/3 spouse = 1

        1/2 husband + 1/2 mother/father = 1
        1/4 wife + 3/4 mother/father = 1

        1/2 husband + 1/4 mother + 1/4 father = 1
        1/4 wife + 3/8 mother + 3/8 father = 1

        1/6 mother/father + 1/4 husband + 7/12 son/s = 1
        1/6 mother/father + 1/8 wife + 17/24 son/s = 1

        1 daughter 1/2 + 1/4 mother/father + 1/4 spouse = 1
        2 daughters + mother/father + spouse all equally = 1
        3 daughters 2/3 + 1/6 mother/father + 1/6 spouse = 1

        1/6 mother + 1/6 father + 1/4 husband + 5/12 son/s = 1
        1/6 mother + 1/6 father + 1/8 wife + 13/24 son/s = 1

        1 daughter 1/2 + 1/6 mother + 1/6 father + 1/6 spouse = 1
        2 daughters + mother + father + spouse (share equally) = 1
        3 daughters 2/3 + 1/9 mother + 1/9 father + 1/9 spouse = 1

        1/4 husband + 3/4 (daughter/s + son/s) 21 ratio male to female = 1

        1/6 mother/father + 1/4 husband + 7/12 (daughter/s + son/s) 21 ratio male to female = 1
        1/6 mother/father + 1/8 wife + 17/24 (daughter/s + son/s) 21 ratio male to female = 1

        1/6 mother + 1/6 father + 1/4 husband + 5/12 (daughter/s + son/s) 21 ratio male to female = 1
        1/6 mother + 1/6 father + 2/3 children mixed (daughter/s + son/s) 21 ratio male to female = 1

        412 kalalah fatherless and spouseless has son; sibling/s fixed at 1/6 or 1/3
        412 .. and if is a man inherited kalalah (no crown/head of household; fatherless and spouseless) or woman

        and has brother or sister so to each one from them the sixth

        so if they were greater from that so they partners in the third

        from after a will is recommended in it or judgment not harmful a will from The God and The God Knowing Forbearing

        1/6 sister/brother + 5/6 son/s = 1
        1/3 sisters/brothers/(sister/s + brother/s) + 2/3 son/s = 1

        1/6 sister/brother + 5/6 (daughter/s + son/s) 21 ratio male to female = 1
        1/3 sisters/brothers/(sister/s + brother/s) + 2/3 (daughter/s + son/s) 21 ratio male to female = 1

        1/6 mother + 1/6 sister/brother + 2/3 son/s = 1
        1/6 mother + 1/3 sisters/brothers/(sister/s + brother/s) + 1/2 son/s = 1

        1/6 mother + 1/6 sister/brother + 2/3 (daughter/s + son/s) 21 ratio male to female = 1
        1/6 mother + 1/3 sisters/brothers/(sister/s + brother/s) + 1/2 (daughter/s + son/s) 21 ratio male to female = 1

        4176 al-kalalah the fatherless and spouseless no offspring/child born
        4176 they seek your ruling say The God gives you a ruling in al-kalalah (the fatherless and spouseless; deceased left no crown/head of household)

        if person died is not to person waladun/offspring/child and has sister so to her half what left and he inherits it if not was to her waladun/offspring/child

        so if they were two (feminine) so to them the third twice (2/3) from what left

        and if they were ikh'watun/siblings rijal wanisa so to the male like share the two (feminine)

        clarifies The God to you lest you stray and The God in every a thing Knowing

        1 sister 1/2 + 1/2 mother = 1
        2 sisters 2/3 (1/3 each) + 1/3 mother = 1
        3 sisters (1/4 each x 3) + 1/4 mother = 1

        sister/s + brother/s distribute at 21 ratio male to female = 1
        1/6 mother + 5/6 (sister/s + brother/s) distribute at 21 ratio male to female = 1

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M Offline
          M Offline
          Mazhar
          wrote on last edited by
          #208

          Again mathematical gimmick without quoting legal provision.
          You do not attend the declarative statement of Allah the Exalted and start calling its mention as nonsense and stupidity obscene. Explore why such verdict giving Ayah is causing irritation to you--- because they compel you to accept your stupidity of arriving at what you repeatedly reproduce mathematics but selfish ego does not permit it---hence irritation and outburst.

          Noon, sincerely advise you to consult someone for psycho checkup before it is too late like 19 gimmicks of Rashad Khalifa that veiled his intellect.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Offline
            M Offline
            Mazhar
            wrote on last edited by
            #209

            Let me make a final attempt to try dissolving clot that got developed in your brain on this issue

            Mind it this declaration is about the INHERITANCE left behind by the father and mother and near relatives.

            Every person with no exception has plural--three and above. And look at the beauty of narration in Qur'aan that it has not left mention of those who must be taken into consideration while distributing that part of wealth left to the discretionary Will of the dying wealthy person. The possibility of ignoring who are otherwise weakest within the ambit of is mentioned seperately after it.

            This is Imperative-a command of Allah the Exalted. Your mathematic equation lengthy gimmick forget to give them their due share.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • N Offline
              N Offline
              Noon_waalqalami
              wrote on last edited by
              #210

              Noon, sincerely advise you to consult someone for psycho checkup before it is too late like 19 gimmicks of Rashad Khalifa that veiled his intellect.

              Mazhar, you are a moron! Your reading is wrong! We know these heirs exist!

              mother, father
              mother, son
              mother, daughter
              mother, sister
              mother, brother
              mother, spouse
              father, son
              father, daughter
              father, sister
              father, brother
              father, spouse
              son, daughter
              son, sister
              son, brother

              Until you answer the above and admit your error everything you write on any subject will dismissed as a moronic rant!

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M Offline
                M Offline
                Mazhar
                wrote on last edited by
                #211

                Mazhar, you are a moron! Your reading is wrong! We know these heirs exist!

                Who denies their existance? The only thing that you are not allowing to enter your brain is that they exist not in isolation somewhere unknown place, but exist alongwith others becoming plural beneficiaries as is declared by Allah the Exalted.

                You are ignoring Verses of Qur'aan deliberately as if they were not the part of speech on Inheritance. Rk had also done this while juggling with digits.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • N Offline
                  N Offline
                  Noon_waalqalami
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #212

                  Who denies their existance?

                  You are! Totally misreading the verse attributing your stupidity and ignorance to Qur'an!

                  Now distribute below inheritance admit your error or you can choose to run away like a coward!

                  mother, father
                  mother, son
                  mother, daughter
                  mother, sister
                  mother, brother
                  mother, wife
                  mother, husband
                  father, son
                  father, daughter
                  father, sister
                  father, brother
                  father, wife
                  father, husband
                  son, daughter
                  son, sister
                  son, brother
                  son, wife
                  son, husband
                  daughter, sister
                  daughter, brother
                  daughter, wife
                  daughter, husband
                  sister, brother
                  sister, wife
                  sister, husband
                  brother, wife
                  brother, husband

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • M Offline
                    M Offline
                    Mazhar
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #213

                    You are! Totally misreading the verse attributing your stupidity and ignorance to Qur'an!

                    If I am misreading it, you please educate me how you correctly read it and share your knowledgable understanding of its perception.

                    I will be obliged.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • N Offline
                      N Offline
                      Noon_waalqalami
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #214

                      If I am misreading it, you please educate me how you correctly read it and share your knowledgable understanding of its perception.

                      I will be obliged.

                      OK I'll be happy to...

                      433 and for all (i.e. each individual) We made heirs (i.e. eligible to inherit) from what left the parents and the close relatives and the ones who pledged your right hands so give them their share indeed The God is over each a thing Witness

                      The above is simply stating that each individual is eligible to inherit from what left their parents, and their close relatives (i.e. their children, brothers, sisters); their spouse, etc. and does not say or suggest as you incorrectly inferred earlier that every deceased person will have minimum of three heirs.

                      It is a known fact that in reality there are numerous people who died or who are going to die will leave no heirs, only one heir, or only two heirs ? simply look at those around you Mazhar including most probably yourself. Therefore, your reading of the verse is incorrect, contradicts reality, and is easily proven false.

                      Also consider the request made and granted ...
                      http//corpus.quran.com/wordbyword.jsp?chapter=19&verse=5

                      Peace!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • M Offline
                        M Offline
                        Mazhar
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #215

                        OK I'll be happy to...

                        433 and for all (i.e. each individual) We made heirs (i.e. eligible to inherit) from what left the parents and the close relatives and the ones who pledged your right hands so give them their share indeed The God is over each a thing Witness

                        The above is simply stating that each individual is eligible to inherit from what left their parents, and their close relatives (i.e. their children, brothers, sisters); their spouse, etc. and does not say or suggest as you incorrectly inferred earlier that every deceased person will have minimum of three heirs.

                        It is a known fact that in reality there are numerous people who died or who are going to die will leave no heirs, only one heir, or only two heirs ? simply look at those around you Mazhar including most probably yourself. Therefore, your reading of the verse is incorrect, contradicts reality, and is easily proven false.

                        Also consider the request made and granted ...
                        http//corpus.quran.com/wordbyword.jsp?chapter=19&verse=5

                        Peace!

                        The translation and inference do not correspond to each other. In translation you say, "for all individuals We made heirs". And heirs are those who are eligible to inherit.
                        In your translation, "each" individual and "heirs" are two different entities.

                        In the inference you say each individual is eligible to inherit.

                        Please reconcile.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • N Offline
                          N Offline
                          Noon_waalqalami
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #216

                          The translation and inference do not correspond to each other. In translation you say, "for all individuals We made heirs". And heirs are those who are eligible to inherit.
                          In your translation, "each" individual and "heirs" are two different entities.

                          In the inference you say each individual is eligible to inherit.

                          Please reconcile.

                          I see, fixated on grammar invented 100 years ago not reading context and avoiding contradictions?

                          6132 and to each (individual; noun) degrees from what they did (plural) and not your Lord unaware of what they did (plural)

                          433 and to each (individual; noun) We made/appointed heirs (plural) from what left the parents and the close relatives and the ones who pledged your right hands so give them (plural) their share indeed The God is over each a thing Witness

                          Once again individuals are made/appointed/entitled as heirs from what left their parents, etc. and not as you infer/read that each individual is guaranteed three or more heirs which is easily proven a false reading and a contradiction simply by finding only one case since the beginning of humanity (~ 57 million people leave us each year or ~155,000 each day) where someone died and left less than three heirs or simply examine each kalalah case ...

                          4176 they seek your ruling say The God gives you a ruling in al-kalalah

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • M Offline
                            M Offline
                            Mazhar
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #217

                            Quote from Mazhar on Today at 033838 AM
                            The translation and inference do not correspond to each other. In translation you say, "for all individuals We made heirs". And heirs are those who are eligible to inherit.
                            In your translation, "each" individual and "heirs" are two different entities.

                            In the inference you say each individual is eligible to inherit.

                            Please reconcile.

                            I see, fixated on grammar invented 100 years ago not reading context and avoiding contradictions?

                            6132 and to each (individual; noun) degrees from what they did (plural) and not your Lord unaware of what they did (plural)

                            433 and to each (individual; noun) We made/appointed heirs (plural) from what left the parents and the close relatives and the ones who pledged your right hands so give them (plural) their share indeed The God is over each a thing Witness

                            Once again individuals are made/appointed/entitled as heirs from what left their parents, etc. and not as you infer/read that each individual is guaranteed three or more heirs which is easily proven a false reading and a contradiction simply by finding only one case since the beginning of humanity (~ 57 million people leave us each year or ~155,000 each day) where someone died and left less than three heirs or simply examine each kalalah case ...

                            4176 they seek your ruling say The God gives you a ruling in al-kalalah

                            Just yesterday you said this

                            OK I'll be happy to...

                            433 and for all (i.e. each individual) We made heirs (i.e. eligible to inherit) from what left the parents and the close relatives and the ones who pledged your right hands so give them their share indeed The God is over each a thing Witness

                            The above is simply stating that each individual is eligible to inherit from what left their parents, and their close relatives (i.e. their children, brothers, sisters); their spouse, etc. and does not say or suggest as you incorrectly inferred earlier that every deceased person will have minimum of three heirs.

                            English preposition "for" which you used yesterday, correctly for Arabic preposition "Li", but today you have replaced it by "to". Are both prepositions "synonym"?

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • N Offline
                              N Offline
                              Noon_waalqalami
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #218

                              Please reconcile.

                              Just yesterday you said this
                              English preposition "for" which you used yesterday, correctly for Arabic preposition "Li", but today you have replaced it by "to". Are both prepositions "synonym"?

                              Peace Mazhar,

                              Regardless if using to/for, each/all does not change the basic meaning or the fact that your reading is erroneous.

                              I'm in process of carefully studying each word which there are ~ 77,797 in Qur'an to find the best non-contradicting and consistent meaning unlike most translations/translators who are careless, too lazy, inconsistent, contradictory, and often insert their own bizarre fetishes like you inserting housemaids.

                              It's a work in progress and today after having a look at all usages decided best/closest to render as such.

                              433 and to each We made/appointed heirs from what left the parents and the close relatives and the ones who pledged your right hands so give them their share indeed The God is over each a thing Witness

                              Use "for" if you like...

                              2148 and to/for each
                              6132 and to/for each
                              734 and to/for each tribe/nation a term
                              1047 and to/for each tribe/nation a messenger
                              137 and to/for each community a guide
                              2234 and to/for each tribe/nation We made/appointed a rite
                              4619 and to/for each degrees from what they have done

                              Now back to the topic of distributions; do you have other than what was posted for these combinations or want to let people decide which is clear, precise, and accurate according to Qur'an IF case THEN distribute exactly?

                              mother, father
                              mother, son
                              mother, daughter
                              mother, sister
                              mother, brother
                              mother, wife
                              mother, husband
                              father, son
                              father, daughter
                              father, sister
                              father, brother
                              father, wife
                              father, husband
                              son, daughter
                              son, sister
                              son, brother
                              son, wife
                              son, husband
                              daughter, sister
                              daughter, brother
                              daughter, wife
                              daughter, husband
                              sister, brother
                              sister, wife
                              sister, husband
                              brother, wife
                              brother, husband

                              Thread is distributing shares according to Qur'an; either provide alternative distributions or stop spamming!

                              Here are all combinations for reference; obviously sole inheritor gets the whole, no need for arbitration laws.

                              411 directs you The God in your children to the male like share the two (feminine)...

                              son/s + daughter/s distribute at 21 ratio male to female = 1

                              411 ... so if kunna/are nisa above two falahunna/so to them (feminine plural) thulutha (2/3) what left

                              and if kanat/is (feminine) one so to her the half

                              and to their parents to each one from them the sixth from what left if kana/is (masculine) to person walad/son (if male child/born)

                              so if not was to person waladun/offspring/child born and heirs person?s parents (if only parents) so to his mother the third

                              so if kana/is (masculine singular) to person ikh'wat (if male sibling/brother) so to his mother the sixth

                              from after a will have made in it or judgment your fathers and your children not you know which of them closer to you benefit obligation from The God indeed The God is Knowing Wise

                              1 father + 0 sibling/s = 1

                              1/3 mother + 2/3 father = 1
                              1/6 mother + 5/6 brother/s = 1

                              1/6 mother/father + 5/6 son/s = 1
                              1/6 mother + 1/6 father + 2/3 son/s = 1

                              1 daughter 1/2 + 1/2 mother/father = 1
                              2 daughters + mother/father equally = 1
                              3 daughters 2/3 + 1/3 mother/father = 1

                              1 daughter 1/2 + 1/4 mother + 1/4 father = 1
                              2 daughters + mother + father all equally = 1
                              3 daughters 2/3 + 1/6 mother + 1/6 father = 1

                              1/6 mother/father + 5/6 (daughter/s + son/s) 21 ratio male to female = 1

                              411 kalalah fatherless and spouseless no son (sibling/s variable/unstated)
                              1 daughter 1/2 + 1/2 (mother + sister/s) = 1
                              1 daughter 1/2 + 1/6 mother + 1/3 brother/s = 1
                              1 daughter 1/2 + 1/6 mother + 1/3 (sister/s + brother/s) = 1

                              2 daughters + mother + sister/s (all share equally) = 1
                              2 daughters + brother/s 5/6 share equally + 1/6 mother = 1
                              2 daughters + brother/s + sister/s 5/6 share equally + 1/6 mother = 1

                              3 daughters 2/3 + 1/3 (mother + sister/s) = 1
                              3 daughters 2/3 + 1/6 mother + 1/6 brother/s = 1
                              3 daughters 2/3 + 1/6 mother + 1/6 (sister/s + brother/s) = 1

                              1 daughter 1/2 + 1/2 sister/s = 1
                              1 daughter 1/2 + 1/2 brother/s = 1
                              1 daughter 1/2 + 1/2 (sister/s + brother/s) = 1

                              2 daughters + sister/s = 1
                              2 daughters + brother/s = 1
                              2 daughters + sister/s + brother/s = 1

                              3 daughters 2/3 + 1/3 sister/s = 1
                              3 daughters 2/3 + 1/3 brother/s = 1
                              3 daughters 2/3 + 1/3 (sister/s + brother/s) = 1

                              412 and to you half what left your spouse?s if not was to them waladun/offspring/child

                              so if kana is (masculine) to them walad/son (if is male child/born) so to you the fourth

                              from what they left from after a will they made in it or judgment

                              and to them the fourth from what you left if not was to you waladun/offspring/child

                              so if kana is (masculine) to you walad/son (i.e. if to person male child/born) falahunna/so to them the eight

                              from what you left from after a will you made in it or judgment...

                              1 spouse + 0 sibling/s = 1

                              1/4 husband + 3/4 son/s = 1
                              1/8 wife + 7/8 son/s = 1

                              1 daughter 1/2 + 1/2 spouse = 1
                              2 daughters + spouse equally = 1
                              3 daughters 2/3 + 1/3 spouse = 1

                              1/2 husband + 1/2 mother/father = 1
                              1/4 wife + 3/4 mother/father = 1

                              1/2 husband + 1/4 mother + 1/4 father = 1
                              1/4 wife + 3/8 mother + 3/8 father = 1

                              1/6 mother/father + 1/4 husband + 7/12 son/s = 1
                              1/6 mother/father + 1/8 wife + 17/24 son/s = 1

                              1 daughter 1/2 + 1/4 mother/father + 1/4 spouse = 1
                              2 daughters + mother/father + spouse all equally = 1
                              3 daughters 2/3 + 1/6 mother/father + 1/6 spouse = 1

                              1/6 mother + 1/6 father + 1/4 husband + 5/12 son/s = 1
                              1/6 mother + 1/6 father + 1/8 wife + 13/24 son/s = 1

                              1 daughter 1/2 + 1/6 mother + 1/6 father + 1/6 spouse = 1
                              2 daughters + mother + father + spouse (share equally) = 1
                              3 daughters 2/3 + 1/9 mother + 1/9 father + 1/9 spouse = 1

                              1/4 husband + 3/4 (daughter/s + son/s) 21 ratio male to female = 1

                              1/6 mother/father + 1/4 husband + 7/12 (daughter/s + son/s) 21 ratio male to female = 1
                              1/6 mother/father + 1/8 wife + 17/24 (daughter/s + son/s) 21 ratio male to female = 1

                              1/6 mother + 1/6 father + 1/4 husband + 5/12 (daughter/s + son/s) 21 ratio male to female = 1
                              1/6 mother + 1/6 father + 2/3 children mixed (daughter/s + son/s) 21 ratio male to female = 1

                              412 kalalah fatherless and spouseless has son; sibling/s fixed at 1/6 or 1/3
                              412 .. and if is a man inherited kalalah (no crown/head of household; fatherless and spouseless) or woman

                              and has brother or sister so to each one from them the sixth

                              so if they were greater from that so they partners in the third

                              from after a will is recommended in it or judgment not harmful a will from The God and The God Knowing Forbearing

                              1/6 sister/brother + 5/6 son/s = 1
                              1/3 sisters/brothers/(sister/s + brother/s) + 2/3 son/s = 1

                              1/6 sister/brother + 5/6 (daughter/s + son/s) 21 ratio male to female = 1
                              1/3 sisters/brothers/(sister/s + brother/s) + 2/3 (daughter/s + son/s) 21 ratio male to female = 1

                              1/6 mother + 1/6 sister/brother + 2/3 son/s = 1
                              1/6 mother + 1/3 sisters/brothers/(sister/s + brother/s) + 1/2 son/s = 1

                              1/6 mother + 1/6 sister/brother + 2/3 (daughter/s + son/s) 21 ratio male to female = 1
                              1/6 mother + 1/3 sisters/brothers/(sister/s + brother/s) + 1/2 (daughter/s + son/s) 21 ratio male to female = 1

                              4176 al-kalalah the fatherless and spouseless no offspring/child born
                              4176 they seek your ruling say The God gives you a ruling in al-kalalah (the fatherless and spouseless; deceased left no crown/head of household)

                              if person died is not to person waladun/offspring/child and has sister so to her half what left and he inherits it if not was to her waladun/offspring/child

                              so if they were two (feminine) so to them the third twice (2/3) from what left

                              and if they were ikh'watun/siblings rijal wanisa so to the male like share the two (feminine)

                              clarifies The God to you lest you stray and The God in every a thing Knowing

                              1 sister 1/2 + 1/2 mother = 1
                              2 sisters 2/3 (1/3 each) + 1/3 mother = 1
                              3 sisters (1/4 each x 3) + 1/4 mother = 1

                              sister/s + brother/s distribute at 21 ratio male to female = 1
                              1/6 mother + 5/6 (sister/s + brother/s) distribute at 21 ratio male to female = 1

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • M Offline
                                M Offline
                                Mazhar
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #219

                                It's a work in progress and today after having a look at all usages decided best/closest to render as such.

                                433 and to each We made/appointed heirs from what left the parents and the close relatives and the ones who pledged your right hands so give them their share indeed The God is over each a thing Witness

                                Use "for" if you like...

                                2148 and to/for each
                                6132 and to/for each
                                734 and to/for each tribe/nation a term
                                1047 and to/for each tribe/nation a messenger
                                137 and to/for each community a guide
                                2234 and to/for each tribe/nation We made/appointed a rite
                                4619 and to/for each degrees from what they have done

                                Did you notice some difference between the two red. Do you know what is the difference between both?
                                And do you know the reason why at some places there is Tanween while at others there is only one vowel sign?

                                If you do not know such elementary things about Arabic your criticism of all the translators seems ridiculous boast.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • M Offline
                                  M Offline
                                  Mazhar
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #220

                                  433 and to each (individual; noun) We made/appointed heirs (plural) from what left the parents and the close relatives and the ones who pledged your right hands so give them (plural) their share indeed The God is over each a thing Witness

                                  Mind it, leave Arabic aside, your English even after switching over from "for" to "to" has not resolved the contradiction in your translation and your inferencem which I pointed out to you.

                                  The translation and inference do not correspond to each other. In translation you say, "for all individuals We made heirs". And heirs are those who are eligible to inherit.
                                  In your translation, "each" individual and "heirs" are two different entities.

                                  In the inference you say each individual is eligible to inherit.

                                  Read your sentence carefully

                                  and to each(individual; noun) We made/appointed heirs

                                  If you know what the preposition "to" means you will realize the blunder in your understanding.

                                  In the sentence "each" with prep "to" is a different entity and "appointed heirs" are different entities.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • N Offline
                                    N Offline
                                    Noon_waalqalami
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #221

                                    Did you notice some difference between the two red. Do you know what is the difference between both?
                                    And do you know the reason why at some places there is Tanween while at others there is only one vowel sign?

                                    If you do not know such elementary things about Arabic your criticism of all the translators seems ridiculous boast.

                                    Mazhar -- you were clearly proven wrong on this topic and instead of correcting yourself and apologizing for wasting my time and spamming this thread you continue being a hard-head needing to have the last word and contributing absolutely nothing to this thread/topic and now you are grasping for anything to redeem yourself including debating if to use "to/for" which I've already told you use "for" if you like, it makes little difference.

                                    Now go away! Play with housemaid or whatever.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • M Offline
                                      M Offline
                                      Mazhar
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #222

                                      Mazhar -- you were clearly proven wrong on this topic and instead of correcting yourself and apologizing for wasting my time and spamming this thread you continue being a hard-head needing to have the last word and contributing absolutely nothing to this thread/topic and now you are grasping for anything to redeem yourself including debating if to use "to/for" which I've already told you use "for" if you like, it makes little difference.

                                      Now go away! Play with housemaid or whatever.

                                      I know whenever you do not have an argument, you say like this or start reproducing a page length mathematical equations.

                                      However, I will give you more points to ponder and realize how much you keep missing while jumping to conclusions and start thinking to have become the only scholar on the subject.

                                      Do you know something about time-line? And do you know time-line in linquistics has a role to determine and understand a text when time adverbs are used therein?

                                      Have you found any time adverb in Inheritance discourse? Did you give a second to understand it?

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • M Offline
                                        M Offline
                                        Mazhar
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #223

                                        Did you notice some difference between the two red. Do you know what is the difference between both?
                                        And do you know the reason why at some places there is Tanween while at others there is only one vowel sign?

                                        If you do not know such elementary things about Arabic your criticism of all the translators seems ridiculous boast.

                                        Take your time. Study further and come back if you have understood the difference. Believe me it will make you to think for some other alternative than switching "for" to "to" to make the verse serve your purpose because it exposed you instead of helping support your inference.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • N Offline
                                          N Offline
                                          Noon_waalqalami
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #224

                                          Take your time. Study further and come back if you have understood the difference. Believe me it will make you to think for some other alternative than switching "for" to "to" to make the verse serve your purpose because it exposed you instead of helping support your inference.

                                          OK this is a thread on inheritance and if you want to open a thread on housemaids or to/for go right ahead.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users