Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. Polygamy - Time to settle the issue

Polygamy - Time to settle the issue

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
285 Posts 15 Posters 20.8k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • U Offline
    U Offline
    unknownuser
    wrote on last edited by
    #281

    Peace Released,

    I know, but I just worry that this topic mind just end up like most of the others; without an answer.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • R Offline
      R Offline
      Released
      wrote on last edited by
      #282

      Peace Fallen Angel,

      Well, I think that there are two conclusions, from what we've gathered in this thread

      1. Ours at the moment Polygamy is sanctioned only within the context of protecting and supporting the interests of the orphans'.

      2. The alternative Polygamy is not sanctioned at all and verse 4.3 has NOTHING to do with polygamy.

      So, at least we've narrowed it down to two.

      Now, the neighboring discussion is of great value, because it will determine on which side of the fence people wish to be on. Both sides are bringing forth their proofs, and I think that only will our answer to 4.3 be answered, but other issues may also be put to rest. Number 2 is being discussed at great length there. If we can rule out Number 2, then we'll be most likely back at Number 1, unless someone else brings forth another arguement specifically geared toward 4.3.

      Noon and Maha are no longer discussing here, and I have not heard back from Dawn. So, let's see what happens.

      We may not end up with a definite answer, but we may end up with a majority concensus of some sort.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • D Offline
        D Offline
        dawngorgeous
        wrote on last edited by
        #283

        Peace Release,

        I am still here, regarding all the discussions on the threads covering this issue. I will chip in when something strikes me. At the moment I am still getting my head around the grammar and my view still holds that the word being translated as 'marry' means something else, such as, 'take care of'. I still believe if it means 'marry' then there are contradictions in the Koran - which cannot happen.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • U Offline
          U Offline
          unknownuser
          wrote on last edited by
          #284

          Peace Dawn,

          The thing is, we need solid proof for this. No where, in Classical Dictionaries, and even Modern Dictionaries, that I've come across, does the word Nikah mean anything but Marry or Sex

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • R Offline
            R Offline
            Released
            wrote on last edited by
            #285

            Peace Fallen Angel,

            I've asked Damon in regard to this. I want to him to bring forth what it is that compels him to believe that nikaah may not only pertain to marriage.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            Reply
            • Reply as topic
            Log in to reply
            • Oldest to Newest
            • Newest to Oldest
            • Most Votes


            • Login

            • Don't have an account? Register

            • Login or register to search.
            • First post
              Last post
            0
            • Categories
            • Recent
            • Users