Biased translations are to be exposed.

jkhan

11-4 “With attribution of the God (Allah); The Merciful, The Generous. The admiration for the God, Lord of the Species/Races; The Merciful, The Generous; Controller of Day of the Direction."

15-7 “You alone we rely on/depend on and You alone we cooperate; guide us to the path, the straight; a path of those who You prospered upon them except the impoverished (Al maghdub) upon them; but not the strayed.”

Here the word ‘Lillah’ is indeed Allah, not ‘ilah’ though there is NO letter of Alif.. That’s what Al Quran is all about.. if you check verse 2212 where the word ‘Lillazeena’ is without the initial letter of ‘alif’ of the word ‘Allazeena’ which turned into ‘Lillazeena’ and replaced by the letter ‘lam’ to mean ‘FOR’…

Note The 7th verse structure is different from all translations.. first two phrases are together the last one separate as you can read the 7th verse above.. So we are commanded to seek the path of the straight. i.e. a path of those who prospered besides impoverishment, but not the strayed

Also, Aalamin is RACES/SPECIES and it is from the root of ʿayn lām mīm (ع ل م) which means Discern/distinguish and Species are but for distinguishing not for demeaning..

‘Ism’ of Allah is nothing but ‘Attribute of Allah’

And you already know that ‘A’abudu’ means ‘Rely on’ or depend on.. so when you depend on Allah alone, then seek to ‘cooperate’ ( ayn wāw nūn (ع و ن) in Him alone..

jkhan

488-9 “That it is We sent you (singular) as Witness, Informer, and Warner; in order you (plural) profess faith in Allah and His Messenger and strengthen (thu’azziru) IT and solace (thu’waqiru) IT and absorb/immerse (thu’sabbi) IT morning and afternoon."

Here conventionally everyone got it wrong.. They took the words ‘Thuazziru and thuwaqiru’ applying to Mohamed stating (Him) in the verses and the word ‘ThusabbiHu they applied to Allah desperately without choice since they can't EXALT Mohamed as their definition of 'thusabbihu=exalt Him.. Big NO… But they were instructed to ‘Strengthen, solace and absorb’ their FAITH.. The word ‘IT’ here three times refers to their FAITH in Allah and the Messenger..
Thuazziru has nothing to do with ‘Respect/honor’ and it is not the root for it.. for respect/honor the root is different ayn zāy zāy (ع ز ز)
Meanwhile, 7157 is totally different from this verse..

jkhan

3823 “That this is my brother, for him ninety-nine of esteemed she-camel (na’ajath), while for me single (Wahid) esteemed she-camel (na'ajath); so he said, 'let me take care of it' and he honored/respected (azsani) me in the proposal."

Note I took it as she-camel of highly esteemed quality because these two were ‘contestants/Khasman’ not shepherds to take as Ewes as widely translated.. They use their highly esteemed camels in races as contestants.. And it is not away from the Arabic language either. The word ‘najath’ is indeed singular and ‘niajath’ is plural.. Why Allah used after 99 singular ‘Najath’… and correctly stated in the next verse ‘Niajath’…. Because emphasizing the highly esteemed she-camel brand… You may wonder why female camels are in a race. Yeah, female camels have more stamina than males in races..

Naja has the meaning of ewe etc. as well.. but contextually it is not ewe

Traditionally translated Khamsan as litigants.. well, what connection for litigants with ewes unless they meant litigants to mean contestants but it is unlikely with ewes..

Prophet Dawood's decision was wrong for a reason and contestant's brother was right....

jkhan

A’raab aʿrāb (أَعْرَاب) = consultants, pleaders, counselor NOT Bedouins

997 “The Counsellers/consultants/pleaders (Al A’arab) are serious/stern in rejecting and hypocrising and walling/frustrating that not discerning of limits what Allah has descended over His Messenger and, Allah is Discerning and Wise.”

A’rab is traditionally translated as ‘Bedouins’ or wanderers.. That’s hilarious according to the contexts of all verses.. Bedouins are indeed Badu in Quran bā dāl wāw (ب د و)… and from it only even English word appeared Bedouins as they are wanderers..

3320 “They are reckoning of the confederates never withdrawing and, that to render the confederates of wishing as if that they stroll (baadu) among the Pleaders/Consultants (A’arab), inquiring about your news. Even if they were among you, they would not have fought except little.”

The CONSULTANTS are those who have NEWS to INQUIRE..... Every civilization had Consultants as we call city consultants authorized.. But they are not exempted from the message of Allah if they are submitted ones..

jkhan

In Arabic word “Qalath’ is feminine and will be used for the feminine side of it.. But through my research of Al A’raab I realized why Allah used ‘Qalath’ for ‘Al A’araab’..

4914 “Qalath(f) Al A’arab (m) / Said the Consultants….”
2113 “ Wa Qalath(f) Al Yehudi (m) ….
2113 “ Wa Qalath(f) Al Nasara (m) ….
342 “Wa Iz Qalath(f) Al Malaika (m)…
372 “Wa Qalath(f) Thaifa Min Ahlil Kithab (m)….
1411 “Qalath(f) lahum Rusuluhum (m) …..”

Above are a few examples from Al Quran.. When a man/men represent through him other than his/their self/selves and meant the SELF/SELVES instead of the man/men in the verse, then Allah has used this QALATH in the Quran.. because ‘Nafs/Self’ is feminine.. i.e. people who represented through a recognition.. let’s above in detail..
4914 Consultants/A’arab are people who have characteristics/possessions/positions/traditions/assignments etc.. And being a consultant they said not as just people.. So it is feminine..
2113 Yehudi or Nasara are people who have characteristics/possessions/positions/traditions/assignments etc.. And being a Yehud/Nasara they said not as just people.. So it is feminine..
342 “Malaika is Jinn Being who have characteristics/possessions/positions/traditions/assignments etc in the form of Malaika.. And being Malaika they said not as just Jinn being.. So it is feminine..

372 “Thaifa/specific Section of occupants of the ordainment who are people with characteristics/possessions/positions/traditions/assignments And being Thaifa min ahlal kitha they said not as just mere people.. So it is feminine..

1411 Said for them their Messengers are people who have characteristics/possessions/positions/traditions/assignments etc.. And being Messenger they said not as just people.. So it is feminine..
If the messenger said as man it is not QALATH .. Just Qala as you can see in Al Quran.. Qala Rasul..
None above are females nor the Arabic word is feminine to represent by QALA, but their characteristics/possessions/positions/traditions/assignments represented through them as identity are feminine..
Everyone REPRESENTED their IDENTITY through a CLUSTER. It’s not everyone who spoke in the above verses but ONE PERSON representing as a SPOKESPERSON of their IDENTITY.. so it is a nafs and feminine singular (QALATH)..

In contrast to the above, you can see in the below verse for example..
5112 “Iz Qala Al Hawwariyun / When the disciples said, …..”
They have no such characteristics/possessions/positions/traditions/assignments with them, and they just represent themselves as disciples and just people…Here everyone spoke not one person..
That’s my take …. You may research and verify your stance on it.. and if anyone has a better grip on it may present in a different thread combining the above pls..

Note Malaika are not females literally in verse 342 as it is stated ‘QALATH Malaika’ as you can clearly notice that Malaika are 'plural masculine' and 'Qalath is singular feminine' ..

jkhan

Haq and Baatil are commonly translated as TRUTH and FALSEHOOD.. but little objection.. I am not making elementary changes in the Arabic language but, let me prove it within Al Quran.. They are not exactly Truth and Falsehood.. read below..
But for TRUTH / ṣād dāl qāf (ص د ق) and FALSEHOOD / kāf dhāl bā (ك ذ ب), roots are different in Al Quran.. We should always take the exact root so we don’t fall behind in the meaning of every connected verses..

Baatil / bā ṭā lām (ب ط ل) = Speculation/conjecture /hypothesis

Haq / ḥā qāf qāf (ح ق ق). = Fact/actuality/Validation

There is a difference between the words TRUTH and FACT as we can elucidate as under..

A 'fact' is a kind of statemnt, that can be verifiable or provable to be true through tangible evidence or illustration or demonstration. It is unbiased and confirmable. For example, “the earth has oxygen” is a fact that can be methodically proven. Fact is on its own.. In contrast 'Truth', is a concept that is more independent or subjective and theoretical.

Meanwhile, Speculation is kind of tentative or undecided information and lie/falsehood intentionally making an untrue statement roughly..

Let’s see a couple of verses

293 “ We have already tested those who of before them, and Allah surely distinguishes those who trued up (Sadaqu), and He surely distinguishes of the falsifiers (Kazthibeen).

4224 “…… And Allah obliterates conjectures/speculations (Baatil) and validates/factifies (wa’yuhiqqu) the fact (Al haq) by His utterances. ….”

jkhan

Haq and Baatil are commonly translated as TRUTH and FALSEHOOD.. but little objection.. I am not making elementary changes in the Arabic language but, let me prove it within Al Quran.. They are not exactly Truth and Falsehood.. read below..
But for TRUTH / ṣād dāl qāf (ص د ق) and FALSEHOOD / kāf dhāl bā (ك ذ ب), roots are different in Al Quran.. We should always take the exact root so we don’t fall behind in the meaning of every connected verses..

Baatil / bā ṭā lām (ب ط ل) = Speculation/conjecture /hypothesis

Haq / ḥā qāf qāf (ح ق ق). = Fact/actuality/Validation

There is a difference between the words TRUTH and FACT as we can elucidate as under..

A 'fact' is a kind of statemnt, that can be verifiable or provable to be true through tangible evidence or illustration or demonstration. It is unbiased and confirmable. For example, “the earth has oxygen” is a fact that can be methodically proven. Fact is on its own.. In contrast 'Truth', is a concept that is more independent or subjective and theoretical.

Meanwhile, Speculation is kind of tentative or undecided information and lie/falsehood intentionally making an untrue statement roughly..

Let’s see a couple of verses

293 “ We have already tested those who of before them, and Allah surely distinguishes those who trued up (Sadaqu), and He surely distinguishes of the falsifiers (Kazthibeen).

4224 “…… And Allah obliterates conjectures/speculations (Baatil) and validates/factifies (wa’yuhiqqu) the fact (Al haq) by His utterances. ….”

Meanwhile, I should reiterate that ẓā nūn nūn (ظ ن ن) root is different and it doesn’t mean ‘Speculation’ but it means ‘assumption’. Baatil is Speculation because they take it intentionally positively what they conjectured or what they found of conjectures/speculations.. Conjectures are a collection of practices and beliefs kept among societies as an accepted set of dogmas.. But Assumption is always negative to a fact and they presume what they want against the fact.. it can be individual too..

Wherever the root ẓā nūn nūn (ظ ن ن) is written in Al Quran is ‘assumption’

4524 “And they said, ‘Not it except the Narrow passage/shortness of our life; we are dying and living, and not perish us except the destiny (al dahar)’. And not for them of that discernment, that they but assuming ẓā nūn nūn (ظ ن ن).

jkhan

506-7 “ Then do they not observe/note into the sky above them how We configured/structured it (banainaha) and compounded it (Zsaiannaha) and not for them (laha) any resistance (Furuj); while the Earth We magnetized/attracted (madadnaha) it, but placed/planted therein immobility/equilibrium (rawasi)…..”

Mind-blowing… Doesn’t Allah know how to elucidate the fact.. it’s a pure configuration of intellectual embellishments having elements leaving no resistance in the compounds of the sky.. Allah here is not talking about stars and decoration but compound elements through which embellished the sky/Al Sama (singular and entire)… here the word ‘laha’ referring to the compounds of the sky.. what a beauty… Allah talks about the ‘No Resistance’ in the sky..
Madad mīm dāl dāl (م د د) is indeed attracting/magnetizing/pulling toward as an archer pulls towards him the arrow before shooting.. It’s not referring to gravity but it is referring to Earth’s magnetism which exists. The word Madad / mīm dāl dāl (م د د) is not Spreading/leveling as they traditionally translated. Spreading or leveling could be some other root... But Allah made it static or of equilibrium to keep the magnetizing effect unfelt to those on it.. Not like the real magnet pulling things..
I have read these two verses in the past more than 100 times but never comprehended them until I explored them on my own.. Explore on your own my fellow faithful ones, Allah will surely guide you if you are honest..

Side note Also the verses that are translated as Allah created heaven without Pillars ... lol. it is not PILLARS.. the word 'IMAD' means 'INTERVENTION' .. NO intervention in the sky..

jkhan

root lām bā sīn (ل ب س) it is not mixing/confusing/clothing/covering/doubt as they all widely translated but it has only one meaning in the entire Quran which is ‘REINSTATE’
the below is what most translate..

242 “And do not mix the truth with falsehood or conceal the truth while you know

But the reality is different.. read below pls..

242 “And don’t reinstate (thalbisu) the fact (al haq) with the conjecture (al bathil) and conceal the fact while you discern.”

It’s a hefty warning and not a simple instruction…
There is a huge difference between both statements.. ‘Don’t reinstate fact with conjecture’ and ‘Don’t mix fact with conjecture’ … The latter is a soft instruction to take care of the facts and conjecture.. One could mix facts with conjectures without knowledge etc… but the former is a command not to reinstate the fact with conjecture because it is a deliberate act.. So Allah has not stated 'NOT to MIX but NOT to RIENSTATE

In a nutshell, they are reinstating Facts with conjecture thus facts be concealed and conjectures shine.. let the fact be fact.. No need to reinstate the fact with conjecture.. with discernment only, one can reinstate something with another.

Doesn’t that make sense? Indeed for those who are honest and faithful in Allah and His message..

let's see another verse below..

5015 “Then were We lacked in the creation of the uttermost? Nay! They are concerned about a reinstatement from a new creation.”

Bajram_Hoxhaj

In Arabic word “Qalath’ is feminine and will be used for the feminine side of it.. But through my research of Al A’raab I realized why Allah used ‘Qalath’ for ‘Al A’araab’..

4914 “Qalath(f) Al A’arab (m) / Said the Consultants….”
2113 “ Wa Qalath(f) Al Yehudi (m) ….
2113 “ Wa Qalath(f) Al Nasara (m) ….
342 “Wa Iz Qalath(f) Al Malaika (m)…
372 “Wa Qalath(f) Thaifa Min Ahlil Kithab (m)….
1411 “Qalath(f) lahum Rusuluhum (m) …..”

Above are a few examples from Al Quran.. When a man/men represent through him other than his/their self/selves and meant the SELF/SELVES instead of the man/men in the verse, then Allah has used this QALATH in the Quran.. because ‘Nafs/Self’ is feminine.. i.e. people who represented through a recognition.. let’s above in detail..
4914 Consultants/A’arab are people who have characteristics/possessions/positions/traditions/assignments etc.. And being a consultant they said not as just people.. So it is feminine..
2113 Yehudi or Nasara are people who have characteristics/possessions/positions/traditions/assignments etc.. And being a Yehud/Nasara they said not as just people.. So it is feminine..
342 “Malaika is Jinn Being who have characteristics/possessions/positions/traditions/assignments etc in the form of Malaika.. And being Malaika they said not as just Jinn being.. So it is feminine..

372 “Thaifa/specific Section of occupants of the ordainment who are people with characteristics/possessions/positions/traditions/assignments And being Thaifa min ahlal kitha they said not as just mere people.. So it is feminine..

1411 Said for them their Messengers are people who have characteristics/possessions/positions/traditions/assignments etc.. And being Messenger they said not as just people.. So it is feminine..
If the messenger said as man it is not QALATH .. Just Qala as you can see in Al Quran.. Qala Rasul..
None above are females nor the Arabic word is feminine to represent by QALA, but their characteristics/possessions/positions/traditions/assignments represented through them as identity are feminine..
Everyone REPRESENTED their IDENTITY through a CLUSTER. It’s not everyone who spoke in the above verses but ONE PERSON representing as a SPOKESPERSON of their IDENTITY.. so it is a nafs and feminine singular (QALATH)..

In contrast to the above, you can see in the below verse for example..
5112 “Iz Qala Al Hawwariyun / When the disciples said, …..”
They have no such characteristics/possessions/positions/traditions/assignments with them, and they just represent themselves as disciples and just people…Here everyone spoke not one person..
That’s my take …. You may research and verify your stance on it.. and if anyone has a better grip on it may present in a different thread combining the above pls..

Note Malaika are not females literally in verse 342 as it is stated ‘QALATH Malaika’ as you can clearly notice that Malaika are 'plural masculine' and 'Qalath is singular feminine' ..

Salaam,

In Arabic and other languages, groups (even those that are grammatically masculine or mixed-gender) are sometimes referred to using feminine pronouns or verb forms.

Example وقالوا النصارى المسيح ابن الله (wa-qālat an-naṣārā al-Masīḥ ibn Allāh)
Translation "And said they (feminine), the Christians, 'The Messiah is the son of God.'"

In this example, قالت (qālat, "she said&quot is feminine singular but can be used to refer to a collective noun (like النصارى an-naṣārā, "the Christians&quot. Even though the Christians include men and the group is grammatically masculine, the verb is sometimes used in its feminine form for stylistic or rhetorical reasons, particularly in classical Arabic or Quranic usage.

342 and when said they (f) the controllers O Maryam
372 and said they (f) faction from individuals the writ
518 and said they (f) the Jewish and the Christians we sons of الله
739 and said they (f) first of them to last of them
7164 and when said they (f) community (f) among them
930 and said they (f) the Jewish Uzair son الله
1410 said they (f) messengers theirs

26123 denied they (f) Aad
26141 denied they (f) Thamud
26160 denied they (f) folk Lut
3812 denied they (f) before them folk Noah and Aad and Firawna
3950 said they (f) the ones from before them
405 denied they (f) before them folk Noah and the parties from after them
5012 denied they (f) before them folk Noah and companions the well and Thamud
9111 denied they (f) Thamud in transgression hers/its (f)

jkhan

5016 “We already have created the human being and discern what confuse in him of his soul and, We are nearer upon him than the Aorta vessel/tube (hable al wareed).”

wāw rā dāl (و ر د) root has a connection with the ‘water main’ where people flock to draw water and also it has a connection to mean arriving at the water. But, the word Wareed is Aorta scientifically.. ‘Hable al wareed’ is ‘tube of the Aorta’.

According to anatomy and physiology, it is stated as under…
The aorta is the largest artery of the body and carries blood from the heart to the circulatory system. It has several sections The Aortic Root, the transition point where blood first exits the heart, functions as the water main of the body. The aorta supplies our organs with oxygen-rich blood..

According to the above, the Aorta is the main DRAWING point of oxygen.. A well of water through which everyone gets water..
The tube of the Aorta is confirmed in my understanding, but why Allah is nearer than the ‘vessel/tube of the Aorta’ is a question mark though. When one day I realize it with the guidance of Allah, let me share..

As of now I sense Oxygen is the main source to keep human beings alive and the vessel of the Aorta doing the job as water main doing the job.. So is Allah nearer than the Oxygen supply? Is that what He says.. up to you..

But the point to ponder is ... Are we closer/nearer to anything other than oxygen? NO.. That's the nearest thing in our life.. Because that's the one we consume every moment in life.. out of all the resources of Allah oxygen is the one we are close.. So Allah is closer than that...

Note I initially thought it was the windpipe of the lungs ... immediately realized it is not.

good_logic

Peace jkhan.

GOD s words "never run out" means just that. . So many interpretations can be approximate to them and much more are still out there waiting for others to come even closer to the "mother/source/jackpot..." interpretation 0f all interpretations.

Let me elaborate with the interpretation you give to "Hablu Al Wareed". You say it is the source of life- oxygen- to the body. If another being is closer to us than than it means they control that source.
Like if one is closer to our source of water to us they can control that water /source and hold the upper hand.
So GOD is basically saying He controls life and death and no one has that ultimate power. i.e GOD is the real source of life.
GOD bless you.
Peace.

jkhan

5016 “We already have created the human being and discern what confuse in him of his soul and, We are nearer upon him than the Aorta vessel/tube (hable al wareed).”

wāw rā dāl (و ر د) root has a connection with the ‘water main’ where people flock to draw water and also it has a connection to mean arriving at the water. But, the word Wareed is Aorta scientifically.. ‘Hable al wareed’ is ‘tube of the Aorta’.

According to anatomy and physiology, it is stated as under…
The aorta is the largest artery of the body and carries blood from the heart to the circulatory system. It has several sections The Aortic Root, the transition point where blood first exits the heart, functions as the water main of the body. The aorta supplies our organs with oxygen-rich blood..

According to the above, the Aorta is the main DRAWING point of oxygen.. A well of water through which everyone gets water..
The tube of the Aorta is confirmed in my understanding, but why Allah is nearer than the ‘vessel/tube of the Aorta’ is a question mark though. When one day I realize it with the guidance of Allah, let me share..

As of now I sense Oxygen is the main source to keep human beings alive and the vessel of the Aorta doing the job as water main doing the job.. So is Allah nearer than the Oxygen supply? Is that what He says.. up to you..

But the point to ponder is ... Are we closer/nearer to anything other than oxygen? NO.. That's the nearest thing in our life.. Because that's the one we consume every moment in life.. out of all the resources of Allah oxygen is the one we are close.. So Allah is closer than that...

Note I initially thought it was the windpipe of the lungs ... immediately realized it is not.

Now let me insert the following verses together and see that give anatomically the right meaning..

5016-18 "We already have created the human being and discern what confuse in him of his soul and, We are nearer upon him than the Aorta vessel/tube (hable al wareed); as the receiving of the double receptacles (al muthalqqiyan) from the right and from the left as planted; not ejecting of motion except having it ready to free

Does these verses talk about as they say angels sitting on the right and left ... or is it different as i have translated.. One would wonder perhaps it is talking about windpipe and the lungs.. Nope.. learn what Aorta and its receptacles are..

jkhan

Peace jkhan.

GOD s words "never run out" means just that. . So many interpretations can be approximate to them and much more are still out there waiting for others to come even closer to the "mother/source/jackpot..." interpretation 0f all interpretations.

Let me elaborate with the interpretation you give to "Hablu Al Wareed". You say it is the source of life- oxygen- to the body. If another being is closer to us than than it means they control that source.
Like if one is closer to our source of water to us they can control that water /source and hold the upper hand.
So GOD is basically saying He controls life and death and no one has that ultimate power. i.e GOD is the real source of life.
GOD bless you.
Peace.

Peace lovely brother..

Yes.. we are not reading Quran translations but we are reading junks of human brains totally biased.. I advise you kindly and with all respect due.. Just read the Arabic verses and explore the meaning of every word and beg to Allah..Then only you are reading Al Quran.. I know it is not easy and full time job but if you love the full story of the book.. But still, simple life also will work for one to achieve the goal but cannot become someone who comprehends Al Quran unless you touch the Arabic..

Thank you my lovely brother..

good_logic

Peace jkhan.

Yes brother, the only thing any two humans can agree to is the instinct of what is right and wrong of how to lead our life. i,e to choose one of them.

As for interpretations, they evolve with the knowledge , the journey and the guidance if they choose GOD s path.

Do you really think that people with"different " eyes ,ears and brain are going to be all similar?

That is why each is only responsible for their own faculties.
I do not claim my understanding is complete nor do I claim I have monopoly for the ultimate interpretation. I seek my guidance and advise everyone to do the same with our creator.

I may share my views like you do yours but we do not have to always agree on interpretations, nor do I expect agreements.
Best of luck with your interesting journey brother.
GOD bless you.
Peace,

jkhan

5031 And Paradise will be brought near to the righteous, not far

And that’s how most of the translations concluded as if Janna is something moving to bring near from far… see below

5031 And will be accessed (uslifath) the Garden (al janna) for the conscientious ones (al muthaqeen), not deniable (baeed).”

The verse is very clear.. ACCESS is not DENIED for those conscientious people from the Garden.. Uslifath is accessed and baeed is deniable or removable..

jkhan

ghayn yā bā (غ ي ب) is translated as UNSEEN as if no one can see by literal eyes… let’s see what it means in reality.. No more duping, let’s use our insight my dear fellow faithful ones..

7226 “of discerned (alam) the deepness/profundity (al ghaib), so not He exposes His deepness/profundity (ghaib) upon anyone.”

3538 “That Allah is of discerned (alam) of deepness/profundity (ghaib) of the heavens and the earth; that He is a discerner (aleem) of possession of the breasts.

344 “That is from the information of the deepness/profundity, We reveal to you…..”

2149 “Those who apprehend of their Lord in the deepness/profundity (algaib), while they are of the Hour solicitous.”

1210 "....Do not kill Yousuf but place him into depth (Ghayabath) of the well ......"

The word can be applied to anything of ‘DEPTH’… it’s not on the surface but dig deep to perceive or see deep to perceive or dive deep to perceive..
what a nonsensical transition is UNSEEN, o my bad I believed it for ages.. Thanks Allah You opened my eyes.. I wish You open the eyes of faithful ones Rabbi.

Bajram_Hoxhaj

ghayn yā bā (غ ي ب) is translated as UNSEEN as if no one can see by literal eyes… let’s see what it means in reality.. No more duping, let’s use our insight my dear fellow faithful ones..

7226 “of discerned (alam) the deepness/profundity (al ghaib), so not He exposes His deepness/profundity (ghaib) upon anyone.”

3538 “That Allah is of discerned (alam) of deepness/profundity (ghaib) of the heavens and the earth; that He is a discerner (aleem) of possession of the breasts.

344 “That is from the information of the deepness/profundity, We reveal to you…..”

2149 “Those who apprehend of their Lord in the deepness/profundity (algaib), while they are of the Hour solicitous.”

1210 "....Do not kill Yousuf but place him into depth (Ghayabath) of the well ......"

The word can be applied to anything of ‘DEPTH’… it’s not on the surface but dig deep to perceive or see deep to perceive or dive deep to perceive..
what a nonsensical transition is UNSEEN, o my bad I believed it for ages.. Thanks Allah You opened my eyes.. I wish You open the eyes of faithful ones Rabbi.

Salaam,

All the terms are derived from the root, غ-ي-ب (gh-y-b), carry the core meaning of something being "unknown," "hidden," "unseen," or "absent."

يَغْتَب (yaghtab)
Form Form VIII verb (يَفْتَعِل - yaf‘alu pattern)
"He backbites" or "He speaks ill of someone in their absence."
This word is derived from the root in a way that emphasizes doing something in a concealed or absent context (i.e., speaking ill when someone is not present).

غَيَابَة (ghayābat)
Form Noun (a form that refers to an abstract state)
"The state of being hidden or absent," often meaning "cover" or "darkness."
It can refer to something being in a hidden state or absent, echoing the root’s theme of absence.

1210 Wa 'Alqūhu Fī Ghayābati Al-Jubbi
and cast ye him in dark (shadowy) the pit

غَيْب (ghayb)
Form Noun (Singular)
"The unseen" or "the unknown," referring to what is hidden or beyond human knowledge.

غُيُوب (ghuyūb)
Form Plural of غَيْب (ghayb)
"Hidden things" or "secrets."

غَائِبِين (ghāibīn)
Form Active participle (plural masculine)
"Those who are absent."
This form describes people who are absent, linking back to the root's meaning of absence.

غَائِبَة (ghāibat)
Form Active participle (singular feminine)
"She who is absent."
Similar to "ghāibīn," but indicating a single female who is absent.

20 in name الله the almighty the merciful
21 alif lam meem (together with the next verse in oldest manuscripts) 22 such the writ not doubt therein guidance for the righteous 23 the ones believing in the unseen (bil-ghaybi) and upholding the connection and from what provision we them spending 24 and the ones believing in what descends to you (sing.) and what descends from before you (sing.) and in the afterlife its themselves assured being 25 those on guidance from lord theirs and those themselves the ones succeeding

https//corpuscoranicum.de/digitallibrary/servlet/Scaler?fn=/projects/corpus-coranicum/manuscript/152/20bf491e-9207-4ce2-a116-f4f815c494d6/manuscript-152-page-55271-image-45669.jpeg&dw=800&dh=800&mo=q1,jpg

jkhan