How Did it Come to This? (Part 1)
-
Did you check out my post on "The Stealth Crusade" for the threat of Missionaries
http//www.free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=6976.0
Sounds familiar and very much common and alive in esepcially Christianity, including Islam, in promoting and converting their beliefs in various ways. Quite a competition. Such missionaries have knocked on my door many a time and left bewildered. The quieter ones are the Hindus and Budhists and the most peaceful of all are the Atheists in this regard, don't you think? And who knows, the Christians and Jews have collaborated to take back what Islam took away, once-upon-a-time and the battle continues, even among themselves, the worst notorious of all battles are witnessed within Islam where sects don't knock on their doors but knock their brains out.
-
Salaam Danish,
If the Muslims are doing this, they should be ashamed of themselves. This goes againts the tenants of "freedom of religion" and "freedom of speech". This is considered illegal in most Muslim countries. I understand it is being done by the Ahmadiyyah / Qadiyanis group and is against the tenant of Islam and Koran
Let there be no compulsion in religion. Truth stands out clear from error, and whoever rejects evil and believes in God has grasped the most trustworthy hand that never breaks. And, God is all Hearing and all Knowing (256) Chapter 2.
Mohamed
-
In some cases (e.g. Ex. 34 ...Elohim called unto him out of the midst of the bush...), it acts as a singular noun in Hebrew grammar and is then generally understood to denote the single God of Israel. In other cases, Elohim acts as an ordinary plural of the word Eloah and refers to the polytheistic notion of multiple gods (for example, Ex. 203 Thou shalt have no other gods before me.). This may reflect the use of the word "Elohim" found in the late Bronze Age texts of Canaanite Ugarit, where Elohim ('lhm) was found to be a word denoting the entire Canaanite pantheon (the family of El , the patriarchal creator god).
In still other cases, the meaning is not clear from the text, but may refer to powerful beings (e.g. Gen. 62 the sons of Elohim saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them for wives...,)
BEWARE OF MISSIONARIES DISGUISED AS MUSLIMS AND TRY TO CONFUSE OTHER MUSLIMS WITH THEIR CHARM, KNOWLEDGE OF ARABIC, AND ALL OTHER KNOWLEDGES! BEWARE OF SATAN DISGUISED IN THE CLOTHES OF SHEEP! BEWARE!
DON'T FALL FOR THIS COMMON TRICK! BEWARE!
Salaam Danish,
When the OT refers to the Judaism God, then it uses the Royalty Elohim with a singular noun. When it uses the word, "gods" then it uses the word Elohim with plural noun. Remember the Semitic languages don't have capital letters to denote proper nouns and smalls letter to denote nouns. There are no capital and small letters in Semitic languages.
So the proper English would be when one means the God of Judaism then one should use the capital letter such as, "Elohim" in English to denote proper noun (God). When one means the gods of the pagans then one should use the small letter such as, "elohim" in English to denote plural noun (gods), or "eloh" to denote singular noun (god) in English. That is the reason the singular noun "Elohim" and plural nouns "elohim" is used in OT to convey the proper meanings as there are no capital and small letters in Semitic languages. It all goes back to
Culturally and linguistically there are two types of major religions in the world.
a. Semitic (children of Noah) based such as Judaism and Islam, who believe in monotheism of God and believe that God is not a human being. Their language is Semitic and their Scripture is written in Semitic language too, both the Talmud (TaNaKh) and the Koran.
b. Zoroastrianism based such as Hindus, Buddhist and Christians, who believe in the concept of trinity and believe that God is a human being. Believe in virgin births, resurrection and dualism of God, believe in 'God the evil and God the good'. Their languages are driven from Sanskrit, such as Koin the version of Greek used to write the New Testament and the Septuagint. The Zoroastrian are Iranians the Aryans, which Hitler was hell bent to create as the only race in the world. The symbol of Nazism called the swastika was the symbol of Mithra the Aryan/Zoroastrian God.
Mohamed
-
Aladdin, in the history of mankind, in both polytheistic and monotheistic pagan dogmas, there's always been "freedom from religion" to bring about "freedom of/in religion" most mercilessly, just because of beliefs and systems grounded in heathenism.
Quran promotes neither the "Freedom of Religion" nor "Freedom of Speech", else all non-believers in Quran and hence Islam cannot be subjected to severe punishment. The verse "Let there be no compulsion in religion. Truth stands out clear from error, and whoever rejects evil and believes in God has grasped the most trustworthy hand that never breaks. And, God is all Hearing and all Knowing (256) Chapter 2.", goes against Quran's own fundamental and rather forceful beliefs. Besides, the attributes of God are also questionable and to most extent meaningless (see Quranic Divinity and Nature of God sections).
-
Peace aladdin, all,
Kaaba means cube.
No, "muka3ab" means cube.
The structure in Mecca is cube shaped.
If it was a cube it would be a "muka3ab"/cube. It is ironic that most people who revere this idol do not know that it is actually not a cube. The height is longer than the other sides. Making the height of the jinn block longer than the other dimensions was a common pagan practice to make the jinn block idol look bigger and more dramatic. You can see this here
http//nabataea.net/eyeidolsml.jpg
The article 'the' in Arabic 'al' is added to the noun ilah then it becomes al'ilah or allah, meaning 'The God or One God" and becomes a proper noun.
Adding the definite article in Arabic doesn't make a word a proper noun. Such made up rule simply doesn't exist in the Arabic language. You can see many examples in the great reading of words where the "al" definite article is added and yet they are not proper names. This is indisputable.
Allah is one of those beautiful noun which is genderless noun and cannot be made into plural.
The plural for al-ilah/allah is "al-alihat". Remember that al-ilah and allah are equivalent. This doesn't take away anything from the fact that there is only one god.
BEWARE OF MISSIONARIES DISGUISED AS MUSLIMS AND TRY TO CONFUSE OTHER MUSLIMS WITH THEIR CHARM, KNOWLEDGE OF ARABIC, AND ALL OTHER KNOWLEDGES! BEWARE OF SATAN DISGUISED IN THE CLOTHES OF SHEEP! BEWARE!
DON'T FALL FOR THIS COMMON TRICK! BEWARE!Thanks for the warning. Most missionaries are just as ignorant in the Arabic of the great reading and in physical archeological evidence as sectarian Sunnis or Shias, so they can be easily refuted.
- Why Iblis (a jinn) was with the angels. Iblis was a very good abd (servant, devoted, who loved God and walked in the straight path) of God. So to make the story short God brought Iblis close to him just like the angels. God knew Iblis' nature, knew him well and God has his own plan. Thus the name Iblis, which means despair. Iblis refused God's direct command and was cast out from the garden.
This story has many baseless speculations that are not supported by the great reading. Let's not take a true example from the great reading and weave a speculative fairy tale around it, otherwise we would be doing just like the missionaries.
a. Semitic (children of Noah) based such as Judaism and Islam, who believe in monotheism of God and believe that God is not a human being. Their language is Semitic and their Scripture is written in Semitic language too, both the Talmud (TaNaKh) and the Koran.
b. Zoroastrianism based such as Hindus, Buddhist and Christians, who believe in the concept of trinity and believe that God is a human being. Believe in virgin births, resurrection and dualism of God, believe in 'God the evil and God the good'. Their languages are driven from Sanskrit, such as Koin the version of Greek used to write the New Testament and the Septuagint. The Zoroastrian are Iranians the Aryans, which Hitler was hell bent to create as the only race in the world. The symbol of Nazism called the swastika was the symbol of Mithra the Aryan/Zoroastrian God.
Unfortunately, Judaism and Sectarian Islam have fallen in the same trap as the others. They have associated physical objects, humans, etc. to bring them near to The God. So the jews dream of building their temple to bring heaven on earth and the so-called Muslims spin around a stone and kiss it to go to heaven and think that the prophet's intercession will be their ticket into heaven. Also, many Hadiths attribute human physical qualities to The God (He be most exalted above what they describe).
Peace,
Ayman
-
Peace Danish,
Sounds familiar and very much common and alive in esepcially Christianity, including Islam, in promoting and converting their beliefs in various ways. Quite a competition. Such missionaries have knocked on my door many a time and left bewildered.
Missionaries have a dogmatic single-minded obsession with advancing a certain ideology. Therefore no matter what the subject is, they will always turn it around and focus on their dogma such as "Jesus will save you". Please try to stick to the subject under discussion on this thread instead of turning every thread you participate in into a single-minded obsession with advancing atheist ideology. This is a sincere advice so that you don't turn into an atheist missionary. Atheist missionaries are just as dogmatic as Christian or any other religious single-minded missionaries.
Peace,
Ayman
-
Missionaries have a dogmatic single-minded obsession with advancing a certain ideology.
Ayman, I am well aware of mythical ideologies and mystical symbolisms in all religions, with or without missionaries.
Therefore no matter what the subject is, they will always turn it around and focus on their dogma such as "Jesus will save you".
Once again, such similarities exist in all religions. Jews talk about Eloah, Christians talk about Jesus and Muslims talk about Allah. Funny thing is that no matter what the outcome, Quran must remain Allah's words, by hook or by crook.
Please try to stick to the subject under discussion on this thread instead of turning every thread you participate in into a single-minded obsession with advancing atheist ideology. This is a sincere advice so that you don't turn into an atheist missionary. Atheist missionaries are just as dogmatic as Christian or any other religious single-minded missionaries.
Please check your own post/s you started this thread off with and ask yourself the obsession of changing Islam and history around. What was all that about, whom is it referencing and from where this thread strayed off. FYI, I'm neither an Atheist nor promoting it. I am questioning and criticizing the integrity of Quran and various pagan belief systems including Islam in retrospect, in similar fashions as yourself and others do unto others as they do unto themselves.
The picture of a Nabataen god you pasted in your prior post is just one of the many gods maintaing various shapes, sizes and forms. The Kaba was/is one of the cuboid stone structures well known long before Islam took over. It has nothing to do with sectarian belief, as there are several, and whether you like it or not, it is part of Islam. Today, people are hustling, bustling and twisting Quranic words to FIT their current beliefs, each having their own sophisticated versions. You cannot neglect nor fight history. Please have a look at the following links of interest
Nabataen gods
http//nabataea.net/blockgods.htmlSemitic gods
http//altreligion.about.com/library/graphics/bl_gilgamesh.htm
http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semitic_godsIslamic and pre-Islamic gods
http//www.palmyra.demon.co.uk/superstition/godsfestivals.htmGods by attributes and regions
http//www.mythome.org/MidEastconcord.htmlIs Allah god?s name
http//www.letusreason.org/Islam6.htmThe cult of moon god
http//www.biblebelievers.org.au/islam.htmHubal (The God)
http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HubalAbrahamic religions
http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abrahamic_religionsThe Failed Hypothesis (a must read)
http//www.colorado.edu/philosophy/vstenger/Godless/Fail.pdfThe God and US
http//www.ghandchi.com/363-GodAndUsEng.htm -
Salaam Ayman,
This is the trick the missionaries play on unsuspecting Muslims that they run them into circle by making Arabic very literal. Of course, non Arabic Muslims get charmed and dazed by it, as their knowledge of Arabic is very limited. For example, when I said, "kaaba means cube." Ayman says,"No, "muka3ab" means cube."
See the connection with, kaaba and mukaab , when one removes the 3 from muka3ab, to make it simple, such as mukaab and kaaba. I am really dazed and charmed by this, such as the serpent charmed and dazed Eve and Adam. See the connection when the British say, India. And the Hindi people say it is Hind. Look at India and Hindi, the letter "H" is removed from Hindi to make it "Indi" and then the letter "a" is added at the end to make it, India. Catch the drift with the two Arabic words, kaaba and mukaab, without the 3 inserted in it.
BEWARE OF THE LITERAL CHARMER! BEWARE OF THE WHISPER! BEWARE! AND READ BELOW!
Arabic is very vast and here is an aya in Arabic, with literal translation and translated by many translators who are scholars.
Maryam 019065
Transliteration Rabbu alssamawati waal-ardi wama baynahuma faoAAbudhu waistabir liAAibadatihi hal taAAlamu lahu samiyyan
Literal The skies'/space's and the earth's/Planet Earth's and what (is) between them (B)'s Lord, so worship Him, and endure patience to His worshipping, do you know (an) equivalent to Him?"
Yusuf Ali "Lord of the heavens and of the earth, and of all that is between them; so worship Him, and be constant and patient in His worship knowest thou of any who is worthy of the same Name as He?"
Pickthal Lord of the heavens and the earth and all that is between them! Therefor, worship thou Him and be thou steadfast in His service. Knowest thou one that can be named along with Him?
Arberry And thy Lord is never forgetful, Lord He of the heavens and earth and all that is between them. So serve Him, and be thou patient in His service; knowest thou any that can be named with His Name?
Shakir The Lord of the heavens and the earth and what is between them, so serve Him and be patient in His service. Do you know any one equal to Him?
Sarwar He is the Lord of the heavens and the earth and all that is between them. Worship Him and be steadfast in your worship of Him; none is equal to Him.
Khalifa The Lord of the heavens and the earth, and everything between them; you shall worship Him and steadfastly persevere in worshiping Him. Do you know of anyone who equals Him?
Hilali/Khan Lord of the heavens and the earth, and all that is between them, so worship Him (Alone) and be constant and patient in His worship. Do you know of any who is similar to Him? (of course none is similar or coequal or comparable to Him, and He has none as partner with Him). (There is nothing like unto Him and He is the All-Hearer, the All-Seer).
Hilali/Khan revised Lord of the heavens and the earth and whatever is between them so worship Him and have patience for His worship. Do you know of any similarity to Him?"
Malik He is the Lord of the heavens and the earth, and of all that lies in between, so worship Him, be steadfast in His worship. Do you know any other being with the qualities like Him?"
QXP Lord of the heavens and the earth and all things between them! Therefore, serve Him steadfastly and be constant in His service. Do you know anyone that can be named along with Him?
Maulana Ali Lord of the heavens and the earth and what is between them, so serve Him and be patient in His service. Knowest thou any one equal to Him?
Free Minds "The Lord of the heavens and the Earth and what is in-between them. So serve Him and be patient in His service. Do you know anything that is like Him?"
George Sale He is the Lord of heaven and earth, and of whatsoever is between them Wherefore worship Him, and be constant in his worship. Dost thou know any named like Him?
JM Rodwell Lord of the Heavens and of the Earth, and of all that is between them! Worship Him, then, and abide thou steadfast in his worship. Knowest thou any other of the same name?
Asad the Sustainer of the heavens and the earth and all that is between them! Worship, then, Him alone, and remain steadfast in His worship! Dost thou know any whose name is worthy to be mentioned side by side with His?"
See, the literal translation and compare it with the many translation by the scholars. See the difference between the literal and the many translations. Arabic is very vast language. Yes, the beautiful names belong to Allah. And, Allah is a name, and some names have meanings too. Names, such as Hassan and Hussein have meanings too, but they are names. Just like Iblis, which is a name and has meaning too. How many ways different names in Arabic are written in English, such as Muhammad, Muhammed, Mohammad, Mohammed, Mohamed, Mohamet, Mohmet and so on.
The missionaries charm and dazzle the unsuspecting Muslims with their literal translation of Arabic, just like in OT, the snake charms and dazzle Eve and Adam.
BEWARE OF THE LITERAL CHARMER! BEWARE!
It is good to know the root and literal meaning of a word, but it should be a starting point for the journey to continue! Not the end of the journey!
To read on the missionaries and how they work of unsuspecting Muslims, read the following post carefully
Check out "The Stealth Crusade" for the threat of missionaries and the methods they use to work on unsuspecting Muslims
http//www.free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=6976.0
By the way, there is no serpent mentioned in Koran. Yes, I forgot, it is only mentioned with Moses and his rod. The Kaaba used to be cube, but with taller people these days, maybe it has changed it shape after 1500 years. Big deal? Do Muslims worship kaaba or Allah. Catch my drift? The photo produce by Ayman of kaaba does look pagan. Big deal? It is charming and yes it did contain idols, but not anymore. Catch my drift. Here is a picture of kaaba
http//www.islamawakened.com/default.htm
There are even some Muslims who due to their pronunciation of Arabic language, mispronounce kaaba (cube) and then the meaning becomes, "prostitute". So what? Big deal? Catch my drift?
My friend Ayman cautions us about the great knowledge of archeology and to quote him
Thanks for the warning. Most missionaries are just as ignorant in the Arabic of the great reading and in physical archaeological evidence as sectarian Sunnis or Shias, so they can be easily refuted.
Peace,
Ayman
The serpents are now trying to razzle dazzle us with archeology and here is the archaeological picture of kaaba sumitted by Ayman
http//nabataea.net/eyeidolsml.jpg
Thanks for charming us. I am razzled dazzled by the above archaeological picture of kaaba. Now the real Muslims, who have overcome with joy should do somersaults. I can only say
Alleluyah! Alleluiah! Halleluiah! Hallelujah! Allaluiah!
Mohamed
-
It's not Arnab.
See the connection with, kaaba and mukaab , when one removes the 3 from muka3ab, to make it simple, such as mukaab and kaaba.
I don't see it. I must be blinded by the cautionary red font. Have you read the thread in it's entirety as well as his other articles also on the main site? Just curious.
See the connection when the British say, India and the Hindi people say it is Hind. Look at India and Hindi, the letter "H" is removed from Hindi to make it "Indi" and then the letter "a" is added at the end to make it, India.
Um, are you serious here?
-
Peace Aladdin, all,
The Kaaba used to be cube, but with taller people these days, maybe it has changed it shape after 1500 years. Big deal?
Just like the missionaries who ignore that Christmas was a pre-existing pagan festival, you ignore that there are many pre-existing jinn blocks that have exactly the same shape like the one in Mecca. Those jinn blocks are older than 1500 years. So we know that the shape has remained the same and it was never a cube.
The big deal is that you come here to defend this pagan structure while you are ignorant of even the most basic information about it such as its shape. This is just like Christian missionaries who defend their ideology while being ignorant about its source.
Another big deal is that just like Christian missionaries when you are faced with the truth, you hide this obvious truth behind spontaneous illogical apologetic speculations such as "with taller people these days, maybe it has changed it shape after 1500 years".
Are you a missionary for the so-called Kaaba?
Do Muslims worship kaaba or Allah. Catch my drift?
Sectarian Muslims surely serve the so-called Kaaba. Haven't you heard of the "servant of the two holy mosques"?
- Surely the pure obligation is to The God alone and those who took less than Him as protectors (say) "We do not serve them except so that they bring us nearer to The God." Indeed, The God will judge between them in what they are differing in.
Just like sectarians who make the so-called Kaaba the center of attention to bring them nearer to The God, if you ask Christians and pagans, they will say that a cross or a statue is simply a means to focus and bring them nearer to The God and they don't "worship" it.
If you are walking in the desert near your hometown and you come across some people who have built a stone structure and are spinning around it and kissing and fondling a stone set in an enclosure in one of its corners, what would you instinctively think? You would instinctively think that those people belong to some weird pagan cult. This is the natural instinct that The God put in all of us. The symbols and rituals are exactly the same in Mecca. The only reason why you don't think the same when you see people doing the same exact thing with the same sort of objects in Mecca is that you have been brainwashed to suppress your natural God-given instinct.
The photo produce by Ayman of kaaba does look pagan. Big deal? It is charming and yes it did contain idols, but not anymore. Catch my drift.
All the similar jinn blocks that predate the so-called Kaaba do not contain idols. Those stone blocks were themselves the idols.
Peace,
Ayman
-
Peace Danish,
The Kaba was/is one of the cuboid stone structures well known long before Islam took over.
This is patently false. There is no mention of the word Ka3ba anywhere in pre-quranic or early post-quranic times in relation to any stone structure. Those stone structures are jinn blocks and they are associated with Arabian idols such as Allat. If you disagree, then show us one inscription or manuscript from "long before Islam took over" that gives the name Ka3ba as that of a stone structure.
Deep inside, there is not much difference between the basis of your beliefs and those of Sunnis or Shias. You both have blind faith in baseless sectarian mythology linking the word "kaaba" in the great reading to the stone structure and you ignore to bring any real evidence to support your claims. Your ideas are an example of atheist Sunnism.
Peace,
Ayman
-
Hello Ayman,
This is patently false. There is no mention of the word Ka3ba anywhere in pre-quranic or early post-quranic times in relation to any stone structure. Those stone structures are jinn blocks and they are associated with Arabian idols such as Allat. If you disagree, then show us one inscription or manuscript from "long before Islam took over" that gives the name Ka3ba as that of a stone structure.
There lies not a shred of doubt that the word Kaka or kaaba has always meant a cuboid structure (a derivative of mukaab), one of which was located at Mecca and worshipped by Muhammad. Pre-quranic or post-quranic evidence of this word exists itself throughout ahadiths, Quran (595 & 597), gazillion religious and non-religious websites, encyclopedias and dictionaries and above all, clearly being witnessed today. Your call for this word to be patently false and not mentioned anywhere is brutal and insane and then calling it jinn blocks, when jinn means hidden, is even sillier. And if jinn meant devils, then worshipping these blocks by Muslims and all other religious denominations speak for themselves. We also know via historical facts that the Kaba at Mecca had been destroyed and rebuilt several times, so much so, that it has now been paintstakenly lavished to accomodate millions of Muslims throughout the world, who not only bow and prostrate towards it on a daily basis, but pay homage to Allah (The God) at least once a year.
Quran 595
Khalifa
O you who believe, do not kill any game during pilgrimage. Anyone who kills any game on purpose, his fine shall be a number of livestock animals that is equivalent to the game animals he killed. The judgment shall be set by two equitable people among you. They shall make sure that the offerings reach the Ka`bah. Otherwise, he may expiate by feeding poor people, or by an equivalent fast to atone for his offense. GOD has pardoned past offenses. But if anyone returns to such an offense, GOD will avenge it. GOD is Almighty, Avenger.Yusuf Ali
O ye who believe! Kill not game while in the sacred precincts or in pilgrim garb. If any of you doth so intentionally, the compensation is an offering, brought to the Ka'ba, of a domestic animal equivalent to the one he killed, as adjudged by two just men among you; or by way of atonement, the feeding of the indigent; or its equivalent in fasts that he may taste of the penalty of his deed. God forgives what is past for repetition God will exact from him the penalty. For God is Exalted, and Lord of Retribution.Shakir
O you who believe! do not kill game while you are on pilgrimage, and whoever among you shall kill it intentionally, the compensation (of it) is the like of what he killed, from the cattle, as two just persons among you shall judge, as an offering to be brought to the Kaaba or the expiation (of it) is the feeding of the poor or the equivalent of it in fasting, that he may taste the unwholesome result of his deed; Allah has pardoned what is gone by; and whoever returns (to it), Allah will inflict retribution on him; and Allah is Mighty, Lord of Retribution."Progressive Muslims"
O you who believe, do not kill any game while you are restricted; and whosoever of you kills it deliberately, then the recompense is to expiate with the same from the livestock, to be judged by of justice from you in the form of a fine which shall reach the Kaab'a; or its cancellation shall be using it to feed the needy ones, while he is denied anything from it; that is to suffer the results of his deed; God forgives what has past. And whosoever returns, then God will seek vengeance from him. God is Noble, capable of vengeance.Quran 597
Khalifa
GOD has appointed the Ka`bah, the Sacred Masjid, to be a sanctuary for the people, and also the Sacred Months, the offerings (to the Sacred Masjid), and the garlands marking them. You should know that GOD knows everything in the heavens and the earth, and that GOD is Omniscient.Yusuf Ali
God made the Ka'ba, the Sacred House, an asylum of security for men, as also the Sacred Months, the animals for offerings, and the garlands that mark them That ye may know that God hath knowledge of what is in the heavens and on earth and that God is well acquainted with all things.Shakir
Allah has made the Kaaba, the sacred house, a maintenance for the people, and the sacred month and the offerings and the sacrificial animals with garlands; this is that you may know that Allah knows whatever is in the heavens and whatever is in the earth, and that Allah is the Knower of all things."Progressive Muslims"
God Has made the Kaab'a the restricted Shrine, as a standing for the people, and the restricted month, and the guidance, and what is posted; that is so you know that God knows what is in heavens and what is in earth, and that God is aware of all things.Deep inside, there is not much difference between the basis of your beliefs and those of Sunnis or Shias. You both have blind faith in baseless sectarian mythology linking the word "kaaba" in the great reading to the stone structure and you ignore to bring any real evidence to support your claims. Your ideas are an example of atheist Sunnism.
Real evidence is mentioned above and in the links provided below. Never heard of "atheist Sunnism", LOL! As I mentioned earlier, it is not possible for you or others to neglect or fight history to bring about newer versions of Islam. You either put up with it or invent your own religion. Can't change facts and can't rely solely on root to shoot.
Jinn blocks
http//aig.cs.man.ac.uk/people/mashhuda/gallery/view_photo.php?set_albumName=Jordan_2002&id=Petra_jinn_blocksKaaba blocks (first picture is of the above link)
http//www.usna.edu/Users/humss/bwheeler/kaaba_blocks.htmlStelas (simply means stone or wooden slabs and pillars)
http//www.usna.edu/Users/humss/bwheeler/nabat_stela.htmlList of tombs and shrines
http//www.usna.edu/Users/humss/bwheeler/alpha_index_tombs.htmlVarious Quran manuscripts
http//www.usna.edu/Users/humss/bwheeler/quran/quran_index.htmlPetra brief
http//www.usna.edu/Users/humss/bwheeler/petra.htmlhttp//nabataea.net/blockgods.html
The word Kaaba found in encyclopedias and dictionaries
http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaabahttp//www.reference.com/browse/wiki/Kaaba
http//dictionary.reference.com/browse/kaba
-
Peace Danish,
There lies not a shred of doubt that the word Kaka or kaaba has always meant a cuboid structure (a derivative of mukaab), one of which was located at Mecca and worshipped by Muhammad.
This is just blindly repeating what sectarians claim. It is based on ignorance of Arabic. The word "ka3ba" has the same exact meaning as its masculine counterpart "ka3b". The feminine simply adds intensification but doesn't change the meaning. Ask anyone what "ka3b" means and they will tell you that it means the heel of the shoe or the heel of the foot (i.e., the base of the shoe or the foot). No one will tell you that it means cube. Also, go to rural areas of Arabia and you will hear people talk about "ka3b al-wadi". Ask them what they mean and they will tell you that they mean the base of the vallet NOT the cube of the valley. Similarly, a related word, "tak3iba" means the base on which grapes climb. In fact, even the word "muka3ab" has the meaning of a cuboid or a shape with bases on all sides. So the meaning of "base" is the one that runs through out the various forms.
Pre-quranic or post-quranic evidence of this word exists itself throughout ahadiths
Typical atheist Sunni logic. You base your beliefs on Ahadiths. In your atheist Sunni missionary zeal you ignore that Ahadith are not pre-quranic.
Quran (595 & 597)
You mean sectarian post-quranic interpretations of 595 and 597.
gazillion religious and non-religious websites
I am sure that websites didn't exist at the time of the great reading so they must all be post-quranic.
In fact, the very web sites that you gave the links to and that show pictures of jinn blocks do not say that the word "kaaba" was ever found inscribed on one of those blocks. For example, you never find an inscription saying "this a Kaaba" or this is "a Kaaba dedicated to this idol". On the contrary, you find the name of the idol (such as Dushara or Allat) on the block or near it but never the word "kaaba".
encyclopedias and dictionaries and above all, clearly being witnessed today.
This is all post-quranic. So you didn't really bring any pre-quranic evidence.
Your call for this word to be patently false and not mentioned anywhere is brutal and insane and then calling it jinn blocks, when jinn means hidden, is even sillier. And if jinn meant devils, then worshipping these blocks by Muslims and all other religious denominations speak for themselves.
The word "jinn" means fantasy/imagination/abstract. Of course, our fatasy/imagination is hidden and abstract is a hidden imagined representation of something. So "jinn" blocks are simply abstract representations of the idols. You can verify this with your own eyes.
We also know via historical facts that the Kaba at Mecca had been destroyed and rebuilt several times, so much so, that it has now been paintstakenly lavished to accomodate millions of Muslims throughout the world, who not only bow and prostrate towards it on a daily basis, but pay homage to Allah (The God) at least once a year.
None of those "historical facts" are pre-quranic. So whatever nonsense Muslims are doing is not supported by the great reading but is based on their mythology and Ahadith. You base your rejection of The God on your blind faith in those very same sectarian mythology and Ahadith. It is ironic that you reject The God but have no problem accepting them.
Peace,
Ayman
-
Peace Danish,
This is just blindly repeating what sectarians claim. It is based on ignorance of Arabic. The word "ka3ba" has the same exact meaning as its masculine counterpart "ka3b". The feminine simply adds intensification but doesn't change the meaning. Ask anyone what "ka3b" means and they will tell you that it means the heel of the shoe or the heel of the foot (i.e., the base of the shoe or the foot). No one will tell you that it means cube. Also, go to rural areas of Arabia and you will hear people talk about "ka3b al-wadi". Ask them what they mean and they will tell you that they mean the base of the vallet NOT the cube of the valley. Similarly, a related word, "tak3iba" means the base on which grapes climb. In fact, even the word "muka3ab" has the meaning of a cuboid or a shape with bases on all sides. So the meaning of "base" is the one that runs through out the various forms.
Typical atheist Sunni logic. You base your beliefs on Ahadiths. In your atheist Sunni missionary zeal you ignore that Ahadith are not pre-quranic.
You mean sectarian post-quranic interpretations of 595 and 597.
I am sure that websites didn't exist at the time of the great reading so they must all be post-quranic.
In fact, the very web sites that you gave the links to and that show pictures of jinn blocks do not say that the word "kaaba" was ever found inscribed on one of those blocks. For example, you never find an inscription saying "this a Kaaba" or this is "a Kaaba dedicated to this idol". On the contrary, you find the name of the idol (such as Dushara or Allat) on the block or near it but never the word "kaaba".
This is all post-quranic. So you didn't really bring any pre-quranic evidence.
The word "jinn" means fantasy/imagination/abstract. Of course, our fatasy/imagination is hidden and abstract is a hidden imagined representation of something. So "jinn" blocks are simply abstract representations of the idols. You can verify this with your own eyes.
None of those "historical facts" are pre-quranic. So whatever nonsense Muslims are doing is not supported by the great reading but is based on their mythology and Ahadith. You base your rejection of The God on your blind faith in those very same sectarian mythology and Ahadith. It is ironic that you reject The God but have no problem accepting them.
Peace,
Ayman
Hello Ayman,
Let me make an overall recap of your gibberish yet hilarious statements made in your post above
What you and a few others here (especially Kyle) don?t seem to understand or rather forgetting that there are proper names and terms given/assigned to a body/thing which also carry a common meaning/noun.
Kab, kaba and mukaab do carry the connoted meanings of base and used in various contexts, but that does not mean that idol stone blocks/slabs were not called Kaba and thus conclude that kaba enforcedly means base. In the same manner, ahmed means praised/admired, in its common form but Ahmed is also a proper name, an identity, a title, a designation, an epithet assigned/given to that specific body/thing/person.
In another example, the word Shireen means sweet, lively, pleasing, etc. but is also a proper name given to a female person, and can be assigned to give a name as an identity to a bird, a dog, a fish, a business, a building or a plaza, a movie, a book, etc., etc. Shireen also addresses honey, candies, nature, smell, drinks, a face, and so forth. It is utterly foolish to take any name/identity/designation out-of-the-bloom and make them common nouns/meanings blindfoldedly without knowing what it is that is being called for.
An ?atheist Sunnism??? Never heard of such a fantastic invention. Must be hidden/fantasized/abstract and pre-quranic in its latest fashion. The Sunnies and Atheists will get a profound lightning shock from you in command to join faiths and become one as ?Sunnatheism?.
You love quoting the word ?sectarianism? (as in Sunnies, Shias, Wahabies, Salafies, Ahmedias, Bahaiies, etc.), not knowing that you yourself along with some others have become one (Quranist or a God-Aloner/Quran-Aloner or a Progressive Muslim or a Reformed Muslim of 21st Century). And, ah yes, never to forget the absolute dainty sectarians, the 19ers (i.e. the Quranic mathematicians). To me, all sectarians come from the same ancient roots of paganism having different tastes and tales to tell.
You mentioned that jinn means fantasy/imagination/abstract/hidden and people fantasized idols, therefore the stone blocks are called jinn blocks and then you want me to verify the hidden/fantasized with my eyes? I?m sure people can fantasize an unknown alien from Jupiter with ease and call it HoopDeLoop.
Then you claim that the word ?kaba? has never been found inscribed on those blocks, therefore they are never called Kaba Blocks, in-spite of numerous evidence provided. But here?s the thing, is the word ?jinn? inscribed on those blocks to become jinn blocks and have you gotten any substantial evidence to back up your own claim from various ?authentic? sources in the manner I presented the Kaba Blocks and that you must present a ?pre-quranic? evidence? I just hope you are not fantasizing like the pagans.
Now here comes the most merciful and gracious part of all fantasies Ahadiths are all post-quranic, Quran?s 595 & 597 are ?sectarian? post-quranic, all religious and non-religious websites are post-quranic, all encyclopedias and dictionaries are post-quranic, all links I provided are post-quranic and all ?historical facts? are post-quranic, therefore none of the above is evidence of pre-quranic. Good lord!!!
So Ayman, are all your posts in this entire forum pre-quranic? Is the entire information provided in the World Wide Web just useless because the Internet itself is not pre-quranic? Are Lanes and Hans Arabic dictionaries pre-quranic? What about yourself, are you post-quranic or pre-quranic? Even Allah will fall out from his throne laughing and mourning with tears when He hears such ludicrousness.
Here?s an example of how the 21st century Quranists make extractions
They pick a word from the Quran such as salaat, check its ambiguous roots from post-quranic Arabic dictionaries, take all the meanings at hand and check them one by one to see IF it FITS the verse. If one or more of the meanings of salaat FITS the verse and makes sense, then VOILA, they think that that is exactly what happened 1500 years ago. When all possible meanings FIT for the same word, then you have several interpretations coming out of post-quranic individuals, all happening at the same time. Why, because the Quran says so that Allah?s words don?t run out?So now then, when Muhammad were to proclaim everyone to perform salaat, some would be doing their rituals in bowings and prostrations towards Allah at Kaba, some meditating in trance mode, some bonding and linking to Allah knows what, some orating to others (making speeches), some just assembling in still motion, some committing to whatever they are doing, some would be turning around in all directions till they get dizzy, heck some may be fantasizing houries in heaven for all you know, etc., etc., then finally comes Allah?s anger at them via 37154 and repeat 6836. Forget about history, who cares, I am still a Muslim, Islam is my religion and Quran is Allah?s words.
Holy Shmoly Macaroni. It ain?t gonna get any hilarious than this.
-
Salaam All,
Kabaa and Mecca predates Abraham read the Koran, read the Koran properly, it is all there.
Man is central to Christianity, and such there is no concept of any other higher intelligence in Christianity. In Islam jinn was created long, long before human. And, the human was nobody, not even mentioned for a long, long time. The world is about 400 billion years old, not 6000 years old as some claim. Read the Koran properly. The Koran talks about other higher intelligent beings beside humans, it talks about Big Bang! (BBC hardtalk in February 2006 with Penrose) and evolution. Read the Koran properly.
The root of Arabic is great but Arabic is very vast and the journey shouldn't stop at the root but should continue from there on.
It is time of Fitna again in Islam, trying to divide Sunni/Shia/Ibada..... BEWARE!
Mohamed
-
Peace Danish,
Let me make an overall recap of your gibberish yet hilarious statements made in your post above
Your "recap" is longer than the original post. Please stick to the subject.
What you and a few others here (especially Kyle) don?t seem to understand or rather forgetting that there are proper names and terms given/assigned to a body/thing which also carry a common meaning/noun.
This proper name argument is another perfect example of atheist Sunnism. This is the same exact tactic used by sectarians. Sectarians love to hide the truth behind meaningless proper names.
Kab, kaba and mukaab do carry the connoted meanings of base and used in various contexts
Yes. This is clear.
but that does not mean that idol stone blocks/slabs were not called Kaba and thus conclude that kaba enforcedly means base.
It is not my problem that you are not intellectual enough to know how to differentiate between common nouns and proper names.
It is easy to differentiate common nouns and proper names. Common nouns fit in the context. We can see that "base" fits in the context of 595 and 597.
The above is enough proof that it is a common noun. When you add to this the fact that there is not a single pre-quranic shred of evidence showing the name Kaaba to be associated with any such structures, then everyone (even those who don't have faith in the great reading) should be certain that it is a common noun.
An ?atheist Sunnism??? Never heard of such a fantastic invention. Must be hidden/fantasized/abstract and pre-quranic in its latest fashion. The Sunnies and Atheists will get a profound lightning shock from you in command to join faiths and become one as ?Sunnatheism?.
You are already joined by the common basis of your illogical arguments. Even from the few statements that Aladdin and you posted here, everyone can clearly see that atheist and Sunni missionaries share the same basic fallacious arguments.
You love quoting the word ?sectarianism? (as in Sunnies, Shias, Wahabies, Salafies, Ahmedias, Bahaiies, etc.), not knowing that you yourself along with some others have become one (Quranist or a God-Aloner/Quran-Aloner or a Progressive Muslim or a Reformed Muslim of 21st Century). And, ah yes, never to forget the absolute dainty sectarians, the 19ers (i.e. the Quranic mathematicians). To me, all sectarians come from the same ancient roots of paganism having different tastes and tales to tell.
So why do you have faith in those tales and base your arguments and conclusions about The God on them?
You mentioned that jinn means fantasy/imagination/abstract/hidden and people fantasized idols, therefore the stone blocks are called jinn blocks and then you want me to verify the hidden/fantasized with my eyes? I?m sure people can fantasize an unknown alien from Jupiter with ease and call it HoopDeLoop.
Aren't those blocks abstract (i.e. imagined) representation of the idols? If abstract/imagined = "jinn" then abstract blocks = "jinn" blocks. It is simple.
Then you claim that the word ?kaba? has never been found inscribed on those blocks, therefore they are never called Kaba Blocks, in-spite of numerous evidence provided.
What evidence? You provided ZERO evidence. If you consider the sectarian mythology evidence then you might as well believe in the tooth fairy and Santa Claus.
But here?s the thing, is the word ?jinn? inscribed on those blocks to become jinn blocks and have you gotten any substantial evidence to back up your own claim from various ?authentic? sources in the manner I presented the Kaba Blocks and that you must present a ?pre-quranic? evidence? I just hope you are not fantasizing like the pagans.
There are numerous inscriptions as well as manuscripts referring to the blocks as representations of idols like Allat. The great reading hints that Allat is a "jinn". So one can see why the ancient Bedouins used the term "jinn block".
Holy Shmoly Macaroni. It ain?t gonna get any hilarious than this.
This is kind of up to you. If you continue to have blind faith in sectarian mythology and happily borrow Sunni missionary tactics then it's gonna, so... BEWARE! http//img100.imageshack.us/img100/8708/pumpkinti0.gif
Peace,
Ayman
-
What you and a few others here (especially Kyle) don?t seem to understand or rather forgetting that there are proper names and terms given/assigned to a body/thing which also carry a common meaning/noun.
This proper name argument is another perfect example of atheist Sunnism. This is the same exact tactic used by sectarians. Sectarians love to hide the truth behind meaningless proper names.
Certainly, as I mentioned earlier, all you sectarians of Islam come from the same boat, each using these same tactics upon the other. And btw, there is no such thing as ?meaningless proper names?. All proper names carry their meanings.
but that does not mean that idol stone blocks/slabs were not called Kaba and thus conclude that kaba enforcedly means base.
It is not my problem that you are not intellectual enough to know how to differentiate between common nouns and proper names.
It is easy to differentiate common nouns and proper names. Common nouns fit in the context. We can see that "base" fits in the context of 595 and 597.
The above is enough proof that it is a common noun. When you add to this the fact that there is not a single pre-quranic shred of evidence showing the name Kaaba to be associated with any such structures, then everyone (even those who don't have faith in the great reading) should be certain that it is a common noun.
You bring your problems unto yourself with ludicrous and circular illogical reasoning throughout your posts. As an analogy, Quran is Allah?s words because it says so.
The word ?base? does not address the proper contextual meaning to either 595 or 5.97 even if it just FITS in (as it has become your fantasized habit), and especially not according to historical facts. Both verses speak of cuboid structure, an idol house named Kaba. Historical evidence, ahadiths, religious and non-religious websites, encyclopedias, dictionaries and above all, from pre-quranic and post-quranic pagan dogmatic ceremonies held at Kaba in Mecca and in much the same exact manner as witnessed today, are all evidence on my side, not yours. All you have is ignorant fantasies to turn history around and make a mess out of it by whatever FITS in the context of verses.
Another silly reason you stated is to go ask the Arabs and see how they talk about kab as base of valley and kaba as base of shoe/heel. Well, certainly, that makes sense but only as common nouns used in those specific contexts. These same Arabs will also agree that Kaba is also the sacred house (a cuboid structure), a heritage no one on earth will forget. In my previous post, I gave examples of how Ahmed and Shireen can both be used as common as well as proper forms, including the example of salaat and how Quranists mess up their Allah?s words when they disregard history. In all actuality, Quran itself is history and supports my views even further.
An ?atheist Sunnism??? Never heard of such a fantastic invention. Must be hidden/fantasized/abstract and pre-quranic in its latest fashion. The Sunnies and Atheists will get a profound lightning shock from you in command to join faiths and become one as ?Sunnatheism?.
You are already joined by the common basis of your illogical arguments. Even from the few statements that Aladdin and you posted here, everyone can clearly see that atheist and Sunni missionaries share the same basic fallacious arguments.
Actually, everyone can see that you as a 21st century Islamic sectarian is trying hard to defy the historical Sunni (Arab) facts, simply because history is not on your side. Not even your Allah can wipe out history, what makes you think you can?
You love quoting the word ?sectarianism? (as in Sunnies, Shias, Wahabies, Salafies, Ahmedias, Bahaiies, etc.), not knowing that you yourself along with some others have become one (Quranist or a God-Aloner/Quran-Aloner or a Progressive Muslim or a Reformed Muslim of 21st Century). And, ah yes, never to forget the absolute dainty sectarians, the 19ers (i.e. the Quranic mathematicians). To me, all sectarians come from the same ancient roots of paganism having different tastes and tales to tell.
So why do you have faith in those tales and base your arguments and conclusions about The God on them?
You need to ask that question to yourself.
You mentioned that jinn means fantasy/imagination/abstract/hidden and people fantasized idols, therefore the stone blocks are called jinn blocks and then you want me to verify the hidden/fantasized with my eyes? I?m sure people can fantasize an unknown alien from Jupiter with ease and call it HoopDeLoop.
Aren't those blocks abstract (i.e. imagined) representation of the idols? If abstract/imagined = "jinn" then abstract blocks = "jinn" blocks. It is simple.
Certainly not! The blocks are not representations of idols but ARE idols themselves and were polydemic. Those pagan idol gods and goddesses were created in all shapes, sizes and forms, the beautiful and powerful ones were made with ?potter?s clay? (refined earth), ring your bells (humans are not made of clay). These kaba blocks as idols were given names such as Arihman, Hubal, Allat, Gabrail, Geb, Azazel, Damu, and thousands of others, along with their ?imagined/fantasized? attributes such ?the merciful?, ?the gracious?, the ?heavens?, ?the earth?, ?the sun?, the ?moon?, the ?evil?, ?rain?, ?thunder?, etc., etc., as seen here (and given previously)
http//www.palmyra.demon.co.uk/superstition/godsfestivals.htm
and here
http//www.mythome.org/MidEastconcord.htmlThen you claim that the word ?kaba? has never been found inscribed on those blocks, therefore they are never called Kaba Blocks, in-spite of numerous evidence provided.
What evidence? You provided ZERO evidence. If you consider the sectarian mythology evidence then you might as well believe in the tooth fairy and Santa Claus.
That is an example of your fantasized imaginations I?ve been talking about. It sure reflects on you.
But here?s the thing, is the word ?jinn? inscribed on those blocks to become jinn blocks and have you gotten any substantial evidence to back up your own claim from various ?authentic? sources in the manner I presented the Kaba Blocks and that you must present a ?pre-quranic? evidence? I just hope you are not fantasizing like the pagans.
There are numerous inscriptions as well as manuscripts referring to the blocks as representations of idols like Allat. The great reading hints that Allat is a "jinn". So one can see why the ancient Bedouins used the term "jinn block".
First you asked me to provide you with evidence of ?kaba? inscribed on those stone blocks, but when I challenged you to provide evidence of inscription of the word ?jinn? on those blocks, you start talking about inscriptions of the names of idols such as Allat. You cunningly and miserably twist around when confronted. This is so very typical your kinds and has been witnessed several times here on this forum alone. All you have is an inscription of Allat and Manat from the Smithsonian tombstone website to prove your itsy bitsy gutless claims, nothing else. You don?t believe in historical facts and events, and then claim to believe in Quranic fantasized history. What a hoot?
Holy Shmoly Macaroni. It ain?t gonna get any hilarious than this.
This is kind of up to you. If you continue to have blind faith in sectarian mythology and happily borrow Sunni missionary tactics then it's gonna, so... BEWARE!
The entire myth, mystic and magic of Quran is poisoned in your jugular vein. You have ZERO knowledge of what the Quran is built upon. Here?s a little exercise for you start reading and counting from Bism Allah Ariham Arihim and work your way through to the last word of the Quran, and discover thousands of pagan idol names mentioned in their attributed forms and sentences. Lets see what your finicky intellectual mind is made up of. This will also help out and pay your respect to the well-known articulated Persian and Arab poets.
http//img100.imageshack.us/img100/8708/pumpkinti0.gif
As far as your gracious symbol is concerned, fantasize your mythical idol Allah and ask Him why He threw down his partnered mythical Evil upon mankind on earth, and kept himself in hiding while pretentiously claiming that He is weee too close for your call (its all in the Quran).
-
Danish dude
You always come into discussions to criticize.
Indulge us and tell us what you stand for, what is your way of life, your aspirations?
What do you think your motives are, your mission, your vision?
What do you think you would advise your children, youngsters, fellow beings?, particularly with your own actions...
What do you stand for? for yourself, your family, and the community you live in?
What are the positive contributions you think you can provide? and have provided...
What do you think will happen to you when you die?
And please no dodging... If you ignore, it means you are just a pityful trouble maker...
Peace out