Skip to content

General Issues / Questions

This area deals with any general questions/issues regarding God / Islam / Quran not covered under other headings.

This category can be followed from the open social web via the handle [email protected]

7.1k Topics 133.0k Posts
  • ....IN SEARCH OF MEANING IN LIFE

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    37 Views
    A
    The meaning of life is to keep the balance. Rich person sees poor person, rich person should make poor man richer. Intelligent person sees stupid person, intelligent person should share their intelligence. Both of these work in reverse. The aim is to dissolve all dualities and differences such that we are united under the sole banner of one ALLAH. With respect, not all people are good stewards of money. If the wealth of the earth were to be evenly distributed, it would not stay evenly distributed for long. Good stewards tend to accumulate wealth. People who can't manage money rarely rise to wealth. People should help each other--but there is nothing wrong with the moderate enjoyment of the fruits of one's labor. Should a brain surgeon (with all of the expense and sacrifice of education plus long work hours and stress) earn the same as unskilled labor? Money's purpose is to circulate--and in passing "bless" those it leaves. Rather than redistributing wealth, my opinion is that it is better to foster an environment where people can (financially) succeed through honest work, ability,or talent (or a combination of the above). We are united under Allah--we all live on earth, we all die, and we are all judged. Allah created duality and difference. Whether the truth is realized (or not) will not affect the truth. The meaning of life...Abdul-Hadi's take (per ability, no specific order) Live in a spiritually fulfilling manner Reproduce Make the world a better place--build it up, don't tear it down Enjoy and appreciate the blessings of Allah Understand as much as possible Whatever else gives your life meaning to you peace ~Abdul-Hadi
  • 33:56. HOW IS THIS OBSERVED

    15
    0 Votes
    15 Posts
    184 Views
    Z
    My personal thought answer is in 37 5Yusuf Ali translation) He it is Who has sent down to thee the Book in it are verses basic or fundamental (of established meaning); they are the foundation of the Book others are not of well-established meaning. But those in whose hearts is perversity follow the part thereof that is not of well-established meaning. Seeking discord, and searching for its interpretation, but no one knows its true meanings except Allah, and those who are firmly grounded in knowledge say "We believe in it; the whole of it is from our Lord"; and none will grasp the Message except men of understanding. How many people you know maybe "prays" on the prophete and argue/support it with verse 3356? Peace herbsman, all When we set out to seek for knowledge, first we ask what after which we seek how and finally we go for why where in we get the wisdom. That is the sequence of my inquiry.I pray I am not misunderstood.However I appreciate the responses. ZUBAIRUS
  • Ma Malakat Aymanukum (Article)

    11
    0 Votes
    11 Posts
    135 Views
    B
    The liberty to interpret any verse in any way you deem appropriate When one completely considers , even the sahih hadith, as being unreliable, the Qur'an completely gets lost and any asbab-e-nuzul/tafsir becomes worthless in the eyes of the Qur'aniyyoon. I am saying this, as this ayat was traditionally being understood as referring to female war captives(or slaves), and that one is allowed to freely have intercourse with those, - which is obviously something unacceptable nowadays. MMA=Those your right hand possess=slaves. Could you explain what you mean by "the Koran completely gets lost". I certainly don't see that. And since when was rape acceptable cause it seems to me thats what you are telling us the Koran means. Looking at Sunni Islam we get (1) Islam does not permit soldiers of the Islamic army to have sexual relations with women they capture in war. Islamic Law requires that such women should first be handed over to the government, which then has the right to decide what should be done with them. It may either set them free unconditionally, release them on payment of ransom, exchange them for Muslim prisoners of war held by the enemy or distribute them among the soldiers. A soldier may have sexual relations only with that woman who has been entrusted to him by the government. (2) Even then, he may not have sexual relations with her until at least one menstrual period has expired; this is in order to establish that she is not already pregnant. If the woman concerned is pregnant one may not have sexual relations with her until after the birth of her child. (3) It is not necessary for female captives of war to be People of the Book in order that sexual relations with them be permitted. The man to whom such a woman is entrusted has the right to have sexual relations with her regardless of her religious affiliations. (4) Only that person to whom a female captive has been entrusted has the right to have sexual relations with her. Any child born to her will be regarded as the legitimate child of her master, and will be entitled to all the rights laid down by the Law for one's issue. Moreover, once such a woman has given birth to a child she may not be sold to anyone, and on the death of her master she automatically becomes a free person. This is rape. Now if we compare what the Koran says about prisoners of war with this nonsense we can see why many people decided to follow Koran. The red part is from Koran, the bolded part is hadith addition and constitute rape. Sunni Islam like Shiasm also allows for the execution of prisoners if the dictator decides. The dictator for them is a god that must be obeyed. You know like Husni Mubarak and Omar Al Bashir and Mulla Omar and Gaddafi. You know.
  • Good link about misconceptions

    23
    0 Votes
    23 Posts
    451 Views
    M
    peace Mazhar, The problem with your interpretation is your own insertions, and that you seem to regard the common Arabic word "muslim" as a proper title/name, when this is not the case. This has been discussed at length in this forum. See http//misconceptions-about-islam.com/muslim-or-hell.htm Although, having said that, technically one should be muslim (small "m&quot to gain "paradise". Peace Wakas, There is no insertion in 1502. What is in parentheses can also be put outside in the striaght translation. What is stated therein is the desire which will be stated and repeated quite often only in the Hereafter. The other word in Parentheses is Grand Qur'aan which is mentioned immediately before this Ayah, which is denied by people about whom the information is given in this Ayah. However I am happay about a little tilt "Although.......".
  • Panentheism, Monism, Monotheism, Polytheism and Pantheism

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    18 Views
    C
    I don't have much to add. Just wanted to say that I currently share your same perspective. Panentheism is actually the strictest possible form of tawhid. 2115 And to God belong the east and the west, so wherever you turn, there is the face of God. God is Encompassing, Knowledgeable. 573 He is the First and the Last, the Evident and the Innermost. And He is fully aware of all things.
  • The earliest monotheism we know?

    19
    0 Votes
    19 Posts
    167 Views
    P
    http//www.custance.org/old/evol/2ch1/2ch1.html bravo
  • Esoteric/mystical understanding of The Quran.

    40
    0 Votes
    40 Posts
    603 Views
    P
    Good to see more people on this line of thought! Crossposting this here aswell, as a quranic refutation of the earlier discussed sufi-concept of God. http//www.islamawakened.com/quran/6/103/ "No human vision can encompass Him, whereas He encompasses all human vision for He alone is unfathomable, all-aware." Quranically, it starts to weigh heavily in my favour I think. angel
  • Questions

    76
    0 Votes
    76 Posts
    2k Views
    R
    Salam and Peace! raheenijaat funny, very funny. There is a folk saying in our country that a person was telling a story about two lovers HEER and Ranjaha (local version of Romeo & Juliet you can say), all the night story went on, and at the end of story the one who was listening asked "Who was Heer"? Indeed, it is very very very funny on our part. Why do we not in the very first place raise this reality that why did Allah not take these ahadith in His Protection, the way He took His Exalted Quran in His Protection!!!? -----and still these people advice others to follow these unprotected (and so vulnerable) stuff as Deen!!! Do the ummah have any answer??? And as such they themselves admit this, and say it is the Imams who took these ahadith in their pretection, and not Allah. They invented science of hadith, chain of hearsayers, self-proclaimed authenticity!!! But any way let me start a new thread for this so it could be saved for specific purpose, all can even participate in that thread too. I would certainly be eager to learn, and if it is proved Authorized by Allah, I would bow my head before it.
  • Hentai...confused

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    48 Views
    K
    In my opinion the 4 witnesses verse you are talking about refers more to a public sex act witnessed, hence why theres punishment. As for hentai if it is of sexual nature regardless of it being cartoon it still affects your mental aspect of your body. I believe we are told to stay away from lewd and indecency so the I guess it is down to an individual. Remember you are responsible for what type of content you are writing in your book that will be handed to you on the Day of Judgment. If you want it to be filled with hentai then so be it PEACE Oh ok thanks for the explanation then
  • Eckhart Tolle

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    27 Views
    R
    Haven't read that one but have heard good things about The Power of Now. Yeah me too cmd. welcome Ethan
  • islam is religion??

    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    34 Views
    S
    dear all... thank you for your response...the informations is very helpful....let me read and study and will come back to you soon ....may God bless you....
  • AMAZING !!!!!!!

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    65 Views
    H
    How? Links?
  • Does God know whole of the future of the individual

    49
    0 Votes
    49 Posts
    1k Views
    H
    I really find the concept of free will quite amazing. We have been created perfect to the point where theres no detail to really fine tune on the design aspect. The final part of the completion of our creation lies with ourselves and the choices we make freely, influencing who and what we eventually become. A freedom which God has willed for us. Our free will brings out the beaty in our faith. One where God never forced us in any way to seek closeness to him, but rather one where we at some point in our lives chose him because that is what we want, when really there is so much in this world opposite to it which we could have chosen. This makes the masterful plan so much more elegant than if we had been created perfect in spirit. I mean its one thing to worship if we were programmed to do it without any choice or freedom. That would render our soul void. It is however a completely different story if we choose to worship through the essence of our free spirit. By free choice and all the things that we have at least begun to understand throughout our lives. Praise be to God, its amazing ). And the beaty of the reality of all things not evident to us due to our lack of truly grasping or having insight. Especially nowdays more than ever we are to distrcated by too many things of no actual importance other than the illusion it conveys into our minds, to be able to have a full relationship to our creator.
  • The Death of Fear- Video

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    25 Views
    J
    To think, this whole revolutionary awaking was started by a woman slapping a poor man in the face in public, that will teach them autocrats and tyrants.
  • Former Muslim

    51
    0 Votes
    51 Posts
    1k Views
    R
    Hello again Wakas, Yes, I'm using an entirely new username, please forgive my secrecy but I trust you'll understand why I gave the Jesus-myth as a short explanation as to the final days and weeks in the turning point of my understanding, after years of trying to reconcile truth and practise in Islam. The historicity of Jesus - Jesus the man who was born of a virgin, who exists in no secular sources is in fact a recyled pre-Christian deity (the fact that such things as the virgin birth are accepted in Islam is testament that it recylced the same myths) such as Osiris. Looking in a simillar manner to other pre-Jewish and pre-Islamic/Christian events shows that most of the stories can be seen as having origins in Polytheistic cultures. If you look further it spills out into the Judaism's Egyptian Captivity myth among other things (since many of these facts are included in the later religions) the original source for these stories being found in ancient art and writing. Genetic analysis of Jewish people corroborates movement contrary to the one found in mythology. Again - the issues surrounding these things are not the sole reason why I'm no longer a Muslim, there are other issues pertaining directly with Islam itself and the nature of the God and I'd rather reacquaint myself with people right now than sit here writing long posts lol D How are you doing anyway Wakas? I'm going to say that I haven't read the rest of the thread, but I just wanted to respond to this. As far as Jesus is concerned, the idea that he is a recycled myth relies on really old and mostly bogus information. Pretty much every major scholar on the subject agrees that Jesus was a historical figure. The agreement is that he was a Jewish peasant and considered himself to be a prophet. The fact that he himself is not mentioned in secular documents isn't really a big deal because his immediate family is well documented, aka his brother James and the Jerusalem church which was a wholly Jewish group, ie they didn't claim that Jesus was a man-god or anything like that. They believed him to be a prophet. This is what the Quran says as well. I would recommend you read "Jesus, Interrupted" by Bart Ehrman. Excellent book on New Testament scholarship. From your post, it seems like you aren't very aware of what is known about the historical figure of Jesus, so if you are still interested, I would highly recommend it. It is a very easy read. As far as the story of Exodus goes, it is also easily verifiable and there is much evidence that supports it. If you are interested, read "The Mystery of Israel in Ancient Egypt The Exodus in the Qur'an, the Old Testament, Archaeological Finds, and Historical Sources ". Here are some quick facts that you should consider. -The "Israel Stele" of Merneptah mentions Israel, and it refers to them as a group of people, not a nation. -Unlike the biblical version, the Quran implies that the group that left with Moses was a rather small group. The bible claims it was 2-3 million. -Unlike the Bible, the Quran states that God preserved the body of the Pharaoh. The fact that pharaohs were mummified was lost at the time Muhammad was a live so for the Quran to claim that God had somehow preserved the Pharaoh so he could be an example to people is certainly something to consider. Also, this statement is not found in the Bible, so if Muhammad was just copying it, this was a rather bizarre and accurate statement of him to make. The Quran mentions many nations and people being destroyed, but the Pharaoh is the only one who is said to have been preserved. -Hamman is a clear reference to the high priest of Yamnu (also spelled Amon, Amoun, Amen, and rarely Imen or Yamun, Greek Ammon, and Hammon). Note that the Pharaoh consults Hamman for religious matters in the Quran. He also asks Hamman to make him buildings. The construction of religious temples was done under the directions of the priests of Amun in ancient Egypt. The Bible doesn't mention any such figure and the knowledge of the religious courts of ancient Egypt was lost at the time of Muhammad. In fact most knowledge of the customs and language of ancient Egypt was lost by 300 BCE. -The Pharaoh asked Hamman to build him a building so he could climb up there and see this God of Moses. The idea of climbing a high place to speak with gods is in fact what the ancient Egyptians believed. I've seen this idea mentioned in several documentaries on the History Channel and other channels. -In the Quran, the Pharaoh keeps saying that he thinks that Moses just wants to drive the people out of the land. Why does he keep saying this? It is because not too long ago, the Hyskos who were a semetic people like Moses had driven the Egyptians out of lower Egypt where the Pharoah now lived. They were driven out only a few generations before Ramesses. -The Pharaoh is called Firaun al-awtad, which is often translated as the Pharaoh of might or the Pharah of the stakes, but when read in context, it is probably saying the Pharoah of high/many buildings. Who was the Pharaoh who was obsessed with building? Ramesses II. All the things noted above also point to him being THE pharoah, and yes we do have his body. -The "Israel Stele" was completed under Ramesses successor Merneptah soon after the death of his father. In it he claims that the tribe of Israel is destroyed. Clearly this wasn't the case. The Pharaoh's would often claim victories when really they had lost. This is apparent in some of the victories Ramesses II claimed because we also have records from the opposing side (the Hittites). -The Quran says that the Pharaoh declared himself to be THE God (7924). Although Pharoahs were considered divine, very few of them actually made this claim. As it happens, Ramesses II did declare himself to be God. The inscription of him declaring this is found at his temple at Abu Simbel. Again, the Pharaoh is the only one that the Quran says made such a claim and no one could have known this at the time of Muhammad. As far as the location of the real Mount Sinai, I think it has been discovered. Everything is there. A giant stone altar with engravings of the Egyptian bovine god Apsis, the cave of Elijah, the bitter springs, and even till this day quails descend by it in large groups which is what the Israelites were supposed to have eaten. It is located in modern day Saudi Arabia. http//www.arkdiscovery.com/mt__sinai_found.htm I think the story of the exodus is actually one of the greatest signs that the Quran is indeed divine. There are so many things in there that Muhammad just could not have known.
  • Specific issues for converts

    18
    0 Votes
    18 Posts
    164 Views
    R
    Rana, I know you are trying to seek help on here for your problem. To me what it sounds like is that you are in need of a friend who will help you sort these things out in a nonjudgmental way. The forum can help. However, the ability to really communicate with someone with out the fear of an open forum with all your problem archived forever, is what you need. Do you have any close friends who you can communicate easily? Or a distant friend who can help? I would seek out some help so that you can work through it and come to some inner peace and understanding. I wish you the best. JewishDude peace Salam, Shalom, Peace peace Salaam jewish dude - glad to see you again. You are soooo right and I've already been bothering a couple of my friends with endless problems that seem to have no solution So, yes I do have friends...though maybe they want to run away rotfl Seriously though (putting on serious voice) these things are hard to discuss with my Sunni friends who I mostly see and hang with and of course many of my friends on here I don't actually see. Sometimes I discuss this stuff with my non-Muslim friends - I have good non-Muslims friends actually (non-religious, Buddhist, Hindu) and they are helpful. Things are really hard right now. It's just one of those times, though I feel more comfy this week than I did last week praise to God. peace
  • finding a Muslim wife as a Quranist

    30
    0 Votes
    30 Posts
    487 Views
    M
    Peace, I completely agree with you brother khan, I keep these same three verses in mind when it comes to marriage, I do become impatient at times, however when I remind myself of disabled brothers and sisters who may never be able to marry I become more patient, indeed it is a test for them and for us. peace and love!
  • What does it mean to be muslim - my present perspective as of 12/03/2011

    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    120 Views
    P
    I believe muslim really means "surrendered to God". And this again means being natural, listening to self, growing as a human being. The word "infidel" can also be interpreted to support this. Infidel, can mean untrue, unnatural. But also someone who cheats on his wife, which is also a typical aspect of the disbeliever. Haqq, might mean the truth, but also the true, the natural. The muslim is taught the Koran, which just reminds him of himself. He is happy, because the traits that The Quran describes as good, he himself finds as good. Meaning that this nature is already his own. A lot of hadith-rejectors, reject hadith by the very same reasoning, that they don't find good in them, and so reject them. The Quran and Islam ultimately is a religion of human growth, and teaches dynamic thinking, and good extrapolatory interpretation.
  • Some thoughts about Islam and the Quran...

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    14 Views
    U
    He is the One Who has since sent to you, the Messenger the Book. Unitary verbal passages, who have the adjectival specification of containing commands and injunctions of firm, established and universal application, are a subset of him/the Book. These are the Mother/Essence/Main Purpose/Pivot of the Book. In addition, the other subset are such verbal passages who perform the act of mirroring invisible realities and facts through metaphorical presentations. The First subset is Passive Participle and the other subset is Active Participle. Thanks for the analysis. That in red is really interesting.
  • Freeman of the Land/Magna Carta - Quranic Perspective?!

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    44 Views
    A
    Salaam Prince, I went to the freemen of the land groups to increase my knowledge on natural law, there are a large number now being established, but they are trying to apply a single aspect of a four model approach so struggle, also they do not understand the original lawful models before William the Bastard, on which topic I have been giving public talks, I'm giving my next one in Nottingham on the 23rd March, I am educating the freemen on the land groups by giving them talks. Islamic models like natural law are the way to free every peoples around the world, without the need for violence, just through the application of the law of the land, also known as natural (common) law. Common law principles All men/women are created equal This means no one can be superior in law to anyone else therefore all sovereigns, monarchs, hierarchies are against common law So you can have no superior A Charter is a superior giving an inferior man a right; all charters are against common law. All slave master business models, as now is the dominant form, are against common law. Your right to contract is without limit You CANNOT impose a contract upon another, contract can only be imposed upon yourself Government is CONTRACT imposed upon you through legislation as statute, all statute and so all legislation is imposed as contract upon you, this is against common law therefore government is against common law in the form of a legislator. You can only contract with another living man/women This means you cannot contract with abstract legal fictions of state, corporation, church or company, as these forms of contract are not supported within common law. This further removes the idea of government as valid. The abstract fictions of Democracy, State, Nation, Peoples, Subject, etc. are not recognised in common law All Courts are bound by common law as the highest form This means a court must be structured within a twelve peer committee plea, with remedy based upon torts, or established through peer decision, free of all superior judgement. So all courts with a superior judge, magistrate or sovereign stand in opposition of common law. You cannot own anything This means you only have an allodial right of personal use or an allodial right of communal use. So all deeds, estate, eminent domain, and all tenancy stand against common law. So if you rent out property you are breaking common law as you cannot rent what you do not own. You only own what you yourself create This means if you add no labour of value to land, the land has no saleable value, it remains free, you can only sell your labour, the earth and its extant resources are always free, and cannot be charged.