A Question About Jinns
-
Well, hadiths are full of doo-doo anyway but for the sake of ah research
"When you circumcise then do not cut severely, since that is better for her and more pleasing to the husband." (Reported by Abu Dawud and Al-Baihaqee and declared Hasan by Shaikh Al-Albani)
Also, one of those ask-an-imam sort of sites http//www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?pagename=IslamOnline-English-Ask_Scholar/FatwaE/FatwaE&cid=1119503543886
Seriously, wtf.
-
From what I have been told (I may be wrong) the prophet did not say anything in a hadith, they were made up after his death.
bravo
He wasn't allowed to either from what I understand from these verses...
Had he uttered any other teachings - We would have punished him - We would have stopped the revelations to him (644-46)
-
bravo
He wasn't allowed to either from what I understand from these verses...
Had he uttered any other teachings - We would have punished him - We would have stopped the revelations to him (644-46)
Of course, you can show evidence like this to the Sunnis and Shi'ites but most of them won't listen.
Peace peace
-
bravo
He wasn't allowed to either from what I understand from these verses...
Had he uttered any other teachings - We would have punished him - We would have stopped the revelations to him (644-46)
bravo
-
I am quite sure that no one who believes that God is love would condone the mutilation of women (or men for that matter)
handshake bravo
-
bravo
He wasn't allowed to either from what I understand from these verses...
Correct.
Had he uttered any other teachings - We would have punished him - We would have stopped the revelations to him (644-46)
Inaccurate/erronous translation, plus you gave a wrong citation.
6943 A revelation from the Lord of the worlds
6944 And if he had ascribed his sayings/anything falsely to Us6945 We would have seized him by the right
6946 Then, We would have severed his life-line
6947 None of you would be able to prevent it6948 This is a reminder for the righteous
6949 We know that some of you are deniers
6950 And that it is a distress for the rejecters6951 It is the absolute truth
-
Correct.
Inaccurate/erronous translation, plus you gave a wrong citation.
6943 A revelation from the Lord of the worlds
6944 And if he had ascribed his sayings/anything falsely to Us6945 We would have seized him by the right
6946 Then, We would have severed his life-line
6947 None of you would be able to prevent it6948 This is a reminder for the righteous
6949 We know that some of you are deniers
6950 And that it is a distress for the rejecters6951 It is the absolute truth
Which translation do you have and what makes it correct?
-
Which translation do you have and what makes it correct?
You've used Rashad Khalifa's translation and concerning these verses it is inaccurate AKA bad. Just compare his with the other ones on www.quranix.net
I'm not saying that his is overall bad, to the contrary, I think it is one of the best, but sometimes/many times it just isnt literal/good.
-
You've used Rashad Khalifa's translation and concerning these verses it is inaccurate AKA bad. Just compare his with the other ones on www.quranix.net
I'm not saying that his is overall bad, to the contrary, I think it is one of the best, but sometimes/many times it just isnt literal/good.
No offense but do you think RK is a messenger? If so, you think he can't translate the Quran properly? hmm
I only used that because it is the Progressive Muslims translation too according to submission.org.
-
No offense but do you think RK is a messenger? If so, you think he can't translate the Quran properly? hmm
I only used that because it is the Progressive Muslims translation too according to submission.org.
rotfl
Misconception Rashad Khalifa was infallible.
Truth Rashad Khalifa was fallibleFact the translation of those verses is not literal.
Check other ones. The literal translation brings across the message way better.Fact orignially, he only wanted to translate the Quran for his family and himself, because he saw distortions in traditional translations - he wanted to make a monotheist translation - not a sectarian/traditionalist one. Then he discovered the numerical pattern.
Peace
-
rotfl
Misconception Rashad Khalifa was infallible.
Truth Rashad Khalifa was fallibleFact the translation of those verses is not literal.
Check other ones. The literal translation brings across the message way better.Fact orignially, he only wanted to translate the Quran for his family and himself, because he saw distortions in traditional translations - he wanted to make a monotheist translation - not a sectarian/traditionalist one. Then he discovered the numerical pattern.Peace
So he discovered the numerical pattern by chance and decided to announce that he is a messanger? hmm
Then what is wrong with anthony why not accepting him poor anthony