Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. General Issues / Questions
  4. The Message - Update

The Message - Update

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Issues / Questions
79 Posts 20 Posters 1.7k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • U Offline
    U Offline
    unknownuser
    wrote on last edited by
    #58

    peace

    if i were to buy 'the message' now (of if/when should I buy it) would it be using the numbering system most popular? and these updated wordings or not?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • LaythL Offline
      LaythL Offline
      Layth
      wrote on last edited by
      #59

      Salam Imran,

      if i were to buy 'the message' now (of if/when should I buy it) would it be using the numbering system most popular? and these updated wordings or not?

      The numbering issue was put to bed a number of months ago and the current version on-line as well as the physical book both use the more popular Hafs numbering.

      As for the current changes being incorporated (basically the Salat translation to bond) that will still be some weeks from appearing as a physical book...I will update this thread accordingly when the process is complete.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • A Offline
        A Offline
        arnoldyasin
        wrote on last edited by
        #60

        Peace,

        May God bless you Layth for all your efforts...

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • A Offline
          A Offline
          AbeAbraham
          wrote on last edited by
          #61

          Arnold,

          I don't see your article on Jinns (Human Leaders??).

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • U Offline
            U Offline
            unknownuser
            wrote on last edited by
            #62

            peace

            May God bless you Layth for all your efforts..

            I second that.

            May He.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • A Offline
              A Offline
              arnoldyasin
              wrote on last edited by
              #63

              Arnold,

              I don't see your article on Jinns (Human Leaders??).

              Peace,

              Here is the link
              http//www.free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=6089.0

              But i don't believe specificaly means leaders. It has multiple meanings, as walking beings refer to multiple creatures, so does the term jinn=beings/things concealed/hidden, refer to multiple things.

              Peace

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • U Offline
                U Offline
                unknownuser
                wrote on last edited by
                #64

                Peace,

                I prefer to have salat either leave it as untranslated as salat, (like jinn) or leave it as translated as ?contact-method?. Because the scripture loses its meaning with this translation of the term salat ?the bond?. See verse 89 26

                ?Nor will anyone be able to free his bonds.?
                Obviously, I don?t think this is referring to ?salat?.

                Just a suggestion!

                Peacxe, rifat

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • LaythL Offline
                  LaythL Offline
                  Layth
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #65

                  Peace Rifat,

                  I prefer to have salat either leave it as untranslated as salat, (like jinn) or leave it as translated as ?contact-method?. Because the scripture loses its meaning with this translation of the term salat ?the bond?. See verse 89 26

                  I am open to suggestions on what is the best approach and best word(s) used.

                  I have already posted on the Jinn issue that I am against leaving words untranslated as that defeats the purpose of the translation.

                  We can revert to contact-method and leave the verses of Sura 9 with the words bond/bonding or even commitment?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • A Offline
                    A Offline
                    arnoldyasin
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #66

                    Peace,

                    Layth, is it also not possible you translate it as you want, and put the word salaat between brackets next to the word. So everyone can see the 'bond' aproach, and at the same time people are not turned off, as they still can see where it says salaat.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • LaythL Offline
                      LaythL Offline
                      Layth
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #67

                      Peace Arnold,

                      Layth, is it also not possible you translate it as you want, and put the word salaat between brackets next to the word. So everyone can see the 'bond' aproach, and at the same time people are not turned off, as they still can see where it says salaat.

                      It is possible, however, my preference is to avoid words in quotations/brackets.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • LaythL Offline
                        LaythL Offline
                        Layth
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #68

                        Peace,

                        If bond was capitalized Bond in all the occurances where it refered to the act of Salat (i.e. wudu, timing, etc.) would that resolve the issue of the reader understanding it as an act and not a general theme?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • A Offline
                          A Offline
                          arnoldyasin
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #69

                          Peace,

                          Hmmm, i still don't like the word 'bond'. But that would be an idea yeah...

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • A Offline
                            A Offline
                            adley
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #70

                            Salaam Layth,

                            Will capitalizing make it just like a proper name (while it's not)? What do you think?

                            =adley=

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • C Offline
                              C Offline
                              CavemanDoctor
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #71

                              Salaam Layth,

                              Will capitalizing make it just like a proper name (while it's not)? What do you think?

                              =adley=

                              Yeah, it'd probably be better to italicize it, not capitalize. That way, the reader becomes aware this is something special and not just bond in the traditional generic sense. Perhaps, a footnote on the page the first "salat" appears would do well to explain the italicized bond.

                              Peace.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • LaythL Offline
                                LaythL Offline
                                Layth
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #72

                                Peace,

                                Will capitalizing make it just like a proper name (while it's not)? What do you think?

                                I am not an expert on the gramatics of English so I am not sure if it would be incorrect to capitlize and still retain the action aspect of the word...Would using italics be more correct? or would it add some confusion?

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • A Offline
                                  A Offline
                                  adley
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #73

                                  Salaam Layth,

                                  I'm no expert either but usually capitalization is reserved for proper names (name of a person, of a building, of a book, etc). I don't think making it italized will cause confusion. Perhaps Caveman's idea is worth the shot.

                                  =adley=

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • WakasW Offline
                                    WakasW Offline
                                    Wakas
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #74

                                    peace,

                                    I think having bond in italics could work, for the regular/timed slw.

                                    All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • U Offline
                                      U Offline
                                      unknownuser
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #75

                                      peace

                                      how about bold? It will stand out. And What I really like about Khalifa's translation was he'd put important arabic words in parentheses next to the translated word. For example

                                      Contact Prayers (Salat)

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • U Offline
                                        U Offline
                                        unknownuser
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #76

                                        Peace All

                                        My 2 cents I really love contact method. It is general enough to encompass all forms of salat yet not so general that it loses it's meaning in the context. bond just seems like an already heavily loaded word with too many pre-conceived notions, while contact method is a relatively newly coined term. I think only quran only folks actually ever heard of such a term before, and so it has less extra baggage than the word bond. Bond to my ears just sounds really generic and doesn't fit the description well enough in all instances. In my opinion, changing the font in any way won't really convey any stronger of a meaning or a different shade of meaning other than just simply 'bond'.

                                        Peace

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • LaythL Offline
                                          LaythL Offline
                                          Layth
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #77

                                          Peace,

                                          My 2 cents I really love contact method. It is general enough to encompass all forms of salat yet not so general that it loses it's meaning in the context. bond just seems like an already heavily loaded word with too many pre-conceived notions, while contact method is a relatively newly coined term. I think only quran only folks actually ever heard of such a term before, and so it has less extra baggage than the word bond. Bond to my ears just sounds really generic and doesn't fit the description well enough in all instances. In my opinion, changing the font in any way won't really convey any stronger of a meaning or a different shade of meaning other than just simply 'bond'.

                                          It can be kept as contact-method, with the exception of the verses where it is refering to a bond/commitment (such as sura 9).

                                          I believe the best way to resolve this issue is to run a poll.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users