Belief in AlQuran
-
Finally back to this thread (sorry for the delay)
Imfromjakarata
676-79 doesn?t exactly mention what makes a muslim.. it?s Ibrahims story
Agreed. Does good work, believes in God = muslim (4133)
28 doesn?t define mumin. Jews /Christians (generally speaking) believe in God and last day but I wouldn?t classify them as mumineen. I think the mutaqeen are the mumineen (22)
And they believe in the gayb/unseen, establish salat and spend from their possessions (23)(ya ayuha) allathina aminou phrase.. i find it interesting how it?s used in 262
inna ?allathina aminou? those who believe, and Jews, Christians and sabians ?mun amina billah? who believe in God.Like it uses iman to differentiate the muslims or mumins and then the Jews et al. 569 uses same concept. It makes me think why differentiate..
In regards to 4170. The message has come to us and it is better for us to believe in it (the Quran). When I initially was reading the verse it kind of felt it implicated there will be some who reject the message (duh obviously) but what I mean is, it feels weird saying this but I almost felt it was saying it?s not a necessity to follow. So I read over it and understood it differently more like we have no escape from God.
I totally agree with you in terms of who go to Heaven and who go to Hell only Allah has knowledge about it. However Allah asked us to judge using the Books, it applies for people who receive Taurat, Injil, (please read QS 544-45 and QS 547) as well as al-Qur'an. All the decision using judgment from the Book must be fair to all parties involve in dispute.
For me the Quran is complete and I don?t need to judge by them (previous books) for example the verse says ?wakatabna ?alayhim? It?s directed to them, what God wrote for them. Not for us to use their scripture to judge by. Also I believe 548 verifies the truth in their scriptures is what is in accordance with Quran.
In regards to intentions, I think they matter and actions also. I see them working simultaneously. You don?t rob a bank to give to the poor, that?s like cheating. The verse you mentioned 2225 implicates intention. However our deeds are very important and will be ours 997-8
Wakas
You?re right, i should study more than enquire through others thoughts/opinions. I guess laziness and procrastination mixes up and creates frustration. So venting thoughts on the forum can help, kinda like a motivator.
Preconceived notions can be difficult to challenge/recognise or to even look at it objectively.
I?m yet to finish the book, i decided to skip a few 100 pages lol and read the kufr section (part of it actually, VII) interesting. I had already had the thought that kufr would be that one reject truth after one has been revealed or shown it based on surah 98. Yet it?s more than that, the idea of ?ungratefulness? never really come to my mind. Though when I read that bit I instantly thought of Sulayman in regards to the throne in which it?s said ?aashkuru am akfuru? (2740). I can see that shukr is something I personally should focus on.
BTW others should read the book (even though I haven?t finished, yes I recommend it!) it?s good as it makes you look at concepts in light you probably haven?t looked at (well for me at least). I think it helps abolish preconceived notions by studying Quran through Quran and the understanding of words by their root. It definitely helps and it?s not just a bunch of words put together, it?s explained thoroughly. So thumbs up for that!
Mazhar
They way I have understood the concepts of muslim and mumin is that a mumin will strive according to Quran, whereas a muslim will do good and believe in God. So in regards to 5721
Mumins also believe in Muhammad as Rasool and thus their actions will be rewarded with jannah.
Maybe i?m missing something.. but that?s my thought.
Abdalquran
You said mumins are the ones who answer to ?alladhina aamanoo? so in regards to verses like 262 and 569
inna ?allathina aminou? those who believe, and Jews, Christians and Sabians ?mun amina billah? who believe in God.The verses use the ?iman? term twice to differentiate between the two, almost like the iman is different.. but not exactly. It?s still calling out to both who have iman. So you reckon only the calling to alladhina aamanou is to mumins, and any other iman call wouldn?t be mumins? Basically what significance do you think it is with the differentiation? If you think there is any?
Keeping your theory allathina aminou in mind, what type of ?believers? are not lost in regards to surah103? All people of iman? Including Christians /Jews?
My thoughts are the ones with iman are the ones who believe in God and Quran unless stated otherwise. So I would think it?s the mumin?s who aminou who are the saved ones. However the Jews, Christians, Sabians will get their ajr/reward.
In regards to muqeen I?m not sure, I would assume one who is a mumin and truly is striving (through their true conviction of their heart) to follow the guide that they have yaqeen, otherwise why gamble? But I dunno I would have to look up the terms possibly it has links with mumin or mutaqeen.
Progressive1993
Thanks for sharing your thought. I had in mind the preconceived notion of kufr as simply ?disbelief? though clearly it?s more than that. -
All very good questions...
-
Actually, "muslim" simply means one who is peaceful, or one who submits. The concept of God doesn't even occur in this word's usage, and the idea of it specifically referring to the act of submitting to God depends on the context.
-
I wouldn't think so. The Qur'aan says that the "ahlu al kitaab" (people of the book), which many determine to be the Jews and Nazarenes, can also be viewed as believers. Therefore, if Jew lives according to the Torah, which is also a revelation from God, he shouldn't be found guilty, nor should a Nazarene who lives according to the Torah and Evangel.
-
Jannah simply refers to "paradise", and it's not limited to those who call themselves "Muslims".
-
No. The idea of "kufr" is not based on 'converting to Islaam', it's about accepting God's signs and avoiding idolatry. Therefore, in that sense, 'converting' is not a requirement of anyone, as long as you believe in God, believe in His angels (or controlling forces), believe in His messengers and scriptures, and believe in the judgement.
-
That's a good question, and I think that depends on how a person perceives God. For example, Trinitarians believe in God, but they are rebuked in the Qur'aan. People who believe that Jesus was 'God Incarnate' believe in God too, but they're also rebuked in the scripture. I think it's important to believe in the complete oneness of God, assigning no partners to Him whatsoever. As long as you do this, I think you'll be okay...
God knows best.
Just a correction intended, Ahmad Bilal,
This is mathematically unsound Jannah ... it's not limited to those who call themselves "Muslims". CMIIW, but that statement implies
is a superset of
or
is a subset ofwhich is not true, according to Alqur'aan.
Had you written Jannah simply refers to "paradise", and the prospect of entering it is not limited to those who call themselves "Muslims" , there would be no need for this correction.
Reading 4145, we may conclude that 'Those who call themselves "Muslims"' while they are actually Almunafiquwn may enter the deepest/worst hell. Unless they return as per 4146. This clarification is needed so no one who reads that statement should feel safe just because they think/call themselves as "Muslims".
7027 (AlmuSalliyn) And those who are fearful of the punishment of their Lord.
7028 Indeed, the punishment of their Lord is not safePeace
-
-
peace,
Wakas
You?re right, i should study more than enquire through others thoughts/opinions. I guess laziness and procrastination mixes up and creates frustration. So venting thoughts on the forum can help, kinda like a motivator.
Enquiry is a good thing, but a balance must be struck with one's own study, that's all I was implying.
Preconceived notions can be difficult to challenge/recognise or to even look at it objectively.
True. Difficult, but not impossible. Like most things, one can train oneself to be better at it. My favourite online course on critical thinking
http//web.archive.org/web/20040415023848/http/www.santarosa.edu/~dpeterso/permanenthtml/lessonFRAME.html
(click through each lesson)And either one of these I regularly refer to
http//www.logicalfallacies.info/
http//www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/ -
Mazhar
They way I have understood the concepts of muslim and mumin is that a mumin will strive according to Quran, whereas a muslim will do good and believe in God. So in regards to 5721
Mumins also believe in Muhammad as Rasool and thus their actions will be rewarded with jannah.
Maybe i?m missing something.. but that?s my thought.
A plain and matter of common sense is that one believes in a thing/concept and then acts on it. In believing there is no physical activity involved. Once someone accepts/believes and declares so he becomes believer/Momin. How would he prove that what he says is true. Only by action, and that is called Islam, Deen, physical demonstration and prove of ones belief.
A person can be a muslim, follower of Islam but may not be a momin. And similarly a person who declares he believes may not be a momin yet physically acts as a muslim for deception. And a person who is momin but did not act as muslim his believing is of no avail. Both will land in hell. Exception is only for the one who wholeheartedly became a Momin at any given point in time and immediately thereafter did not find time and died, that is why it is also stated without qualifying or linking it with righteous deeds that Paradise is prepared for those who believed in Allah and all His Messengers.
-
You said mumins are the ones who answer to ?alladhina aamanoo? so in regards to verses like 262 and 569
inna ?allathina aminou? those who believe, and Jews, Christians and Sabians ?mun amina billah? who believe in God.The verses use the ?iman? term twice to differentiate between the two, almost like the iman is different.. but not exactly. It?s still calling out to both who have iman. So you reckon only the calling to alladhina aamanou is to mumins, and any other iman call wouldn?t be mumins? Basically what significance do you think it is with the differentiation? If you think there is any?
Well, as we discussed before, there are grades of iman. The first set of people (alladhina aamanou) are those who answer the calls given in Quran. Not necessarily all of them, of course. However, the bare minimum is the 'man amana billah' bit.
Keeping your theory allathina aminou in mind, what type of ?believers? are not lost in regards to surah103? All people of iman? Including Christians /Jews?
I think 'tawasau bil haqq and bis sabr' is another explanation of amal as-salih so yeah, it's for any people who follow this.
My thoughts are the ones with iman are the ones who believe in God and Quran unless stated otherwise. So I would think it?s the mumin?s who aminou who are the saved ones. However the Jews, Christians, Sabians will get their ajr/reward.
I dunno, the 'no fear nor grief' bit isn't limited to earth (or it'd say 'fid dunya'. I think its a matter of lower garden or higher garden. I don't think that these refer to jews, christians, sabians anyway. I think we need to research the meanings and find ones fitting to the Quranic message which doesnt acknowledge religious groupings.
In regards to muqeen I?m not sure, I would assume one who is a mumin and truly is striving (through their true conviction of their heart) to follow the guide that they have yaqeen, otherwise why gamble? But I dunno I would have to look up the terms possibly it has links with mumin or mutaqeen.
At the moment, I think muqeen is the highest level of iman. 49/14-15 seems to agree with that. But yes, we need to research further.
Thanks for a thought provoking discussion.
-
Peace,
At the moment, I think muqeen is the highest level of iman. 49/14-15 seems to agree with that. But yes, we need to research further.
Thanks for a thought provoking discussion.
Muqeen? You mean muttaqeen (Almuttaqiyn)? I don't know about the highest level of Imaan, but yea i agree it surely ranks among the highest. Whether it's Almuttaqiyn or AlmuHsiniyn (or else) which ranks the highest, you'll find their descriptions in AQ intersect with each other. (btw 4914-15 ends with AlSaAdiquwn and i can't find muttaqiyn in them--sure you quoted the right verse number?)
Maybe it will be something like (all terms in plural)
muslimiyn --> mu'miniyn --> muSliHiyn (those who does `aml SaliHat) --> ... ... ... --> muHsiniyn/muttaqiyn/...?
maybe these will fall in between or as part of the above (e.g., part of muSliHiyn or muHsiniyn or muttaqiyn), and more importantly, they don't necessarily fall in a linear hiearchy
muSalliyn those who perform SalaAt
mujahidiyn those who strive in the way of Allah
Sabiriyn those who persevere/are patient (in hardship)
Hasiiyn (Khashiiyn) those who are khushu` (certain that they will meet Allah)
sakiriyn those who are thankful to Allah
Saadiqiyn those who are truthful
qaanitiyn those who are obedient?
munfiqiyn those who spend in the way of Allah
mustaGfiriyn those who ask for Allah's forgiveness
tawwabiyn those who return to Allah
mutaTahhiriyn those who clean/purify themselves
muqsiTiyn those who maintain justice
mutawakkiliyn those who put all trust and rely on Allah
...on the opposite there are munaafiqiyn, kaafiriyn, faasiqiyn ...
Some of those are roles or characters with specific action or characteristic while others are hybrid or combination or composite of other roles/characters.
It'd be nice if we have a complete 'map' of those roles/characters for study or practical purpose.
Peace
(ed grammar)
-
28 doesn?t define mumin. Jews /Christians (generally speaking) believe in God and last day but I wouldn?t classify them as mumineen. I think the mutaqeen are the mumineen (22)
And they believe in the gayb/unseen, establish salat and spend from their possessions (23)If you look at 3113-115, ahul al kitab can be muttaqeen. I don't hold to the view that people of the book = jew, christians, etc. People of the book must be studied on its own. Like every other group mentioned in the Reading, there are good and bad among them.
If Iman is a literal thing, how do you explain 3441.
Peace,
You mean muttaqeen (Almuttaqiyn)? I don't know about the highest level of Imaan, but yea i agree it surely ranks among the highest. Whether it's Almuttaqiyn or AlmuHsiniyn (or else) which ranks the highest, you'll find their descriptions in AQ intersect with each other. (btw 4914-15 ends with AlSaAdiquwn and i can't find muttaqiyn in them--sure you quoted the right verse number?)
Muttaqeen, almuhsynin etc are not specific groups, they are states, aspects of a mumin. See we start out as muslims and slowly we work our way up to the status of a mumin... If we read carefuly 22-9+ we'll see that muttaqeen are a) being contrasted with kafireen and b) being used synonymously for a mumin
22 for example tells us that al kitab is a guidance for al-muttaqeen. 317 also an interesting verse. See also 938-44. Again muttaqeen and mumineen are being used interchangably.
-
Peace, Jack
Muttaqeen, almuhsynin etc are not specific groups, they are states, aspects of a mumin.
Hence i said they intersect with each other, the group/set is just a way to see it in particular. When GOD calls "Yaa ayyuha Alladiyna Aamanuw", whoever think of himself as mu'min will think they're called. Consider that as an imaginary or mathematical group/set. Not a group of people under the banner of "mu'miniyn". That indeed doesn't make sense.
Why the group/set view?
Because It ease you to break down such a complex concept as 'muttaqeen', 'almuHsiniyn' etc. If we wanted to reach that state, then we might as well study those "states" or "aspects" which may help us to reach it.
See we start out as muslims and slowly we work our way up to the status of a mumin... If we read carefuly 22-9+ we'll see that muttaqeen are a) being contrasted with kafireen and b) being used synonymously for a mumin
22 for example tells us that al kitab is a guidance for al-muttaqeen.
Let's continue that a little further
23 Alladiyna yu'minuwna bi'lGaybi wa yuqiymuwna 'lSalaAta wa mimmaA razaqnaA hum yunfiquwn
Who believe in the unseen, establish AlSalaAt, and of what We have provided for them they spend out24 w Alladiyna yu'minuwna bimaA Unzila Ilayka wa maA Unzila min qablika wa bi'lAaHirati hum yuwqinuwn
And who believe in what has been revealed to you and what was revealed before you, and of the Hereafter they are certain.That is how we understand Almuttaqiyn from these early verses.
Almuttaqiyn do believe in the unseen and establish AlSalaAt and spend out
Almuttaqiyn, in addition to our previous understanding of Almuttaqiyn, do believe in what has been revealed to them and what was revealed before them and certain of the HereafterBut what is AlGaiyb? What is AlSalaAt? How and to whom we spend? What is AlAaHirat? Through the Quran, more information on Almuttaqiyn and also on those terms/words/concepts not made clear in the earlier verses are then revealed gradually. This is an example. The next ones also from what you referred
317 also an interesting verse. See also 938-44. Again muttaqeen and mumineen are being used interchangably.
317 is another excellent example on how various other characters/roles/states/aspects are used to describe another character/state. The context of the verse must be studied to understand what character/state is being described. (hint 315). Either you see it that way (the latter explaining the former) or another (the former explaining the latter), your understanding of all of those characters/states would increase collectively (mentioned the concepts of ittaquw, `ibad, jannah, Imaan, IstiGfar, Sabr, Sadiq, qanit, infaq).
944 Those who believe in Allah and the Last Day would not ask permission of you to be excused from striving with their wealth and their lives. And Allah is Knowing of those who fear Him (Almuttaqiyn).
To understand why Almuttaqiyn is used to end this verse, let's see 2177, which includes believe in Allah and the Last Day. Those were informed to us to be parts of what Almuttaqiyn do. So, by including the word Almuttaqiyn in the verse 944, don't you think Allah reminded us of a concept more complete than that described in 944?
Now finally, re "synonymously", let me ask you something, Jack
-
If we took muttaqiyn and mu'minuwn as synonym, how can we learn something new from each?
-
Why there are two distinct words used if they are indeed synonym?
Peace
-
-
I would contend and humbly submit that there is hardly ANY HUMANBEING on this planet earth that does not believe in Qur'an. It is only the current perverted definition of Qur'an; they do not agree with or believe in.
Peace
Badar
And many do not agree that it is a divine book from God but rather made up by the prophet Mohammed PBUH
-
I had a flick through the links. Thanks Wakas. I?ll train myself in future inshallah.
Mazhar
There can be many factors.. What we say we are is not necessary a true reflection of what we truly are... as the saying goes ?actions speak louder than words?. Though hopefully, we can be true to ourselves.I don?t understand how a mumin cannot or wouldn?t act as a muslim. Wouldn?t you think they?d need to be muslims to be mumins?
abdulquran you said
I think 'tawasau bil haqq and bis sabr' is another explanation of amal as-salih so yeah, it's for any people who follow this.
I think they are elements of `amal saleh.. but now i can argue what is haqq, is not Quran haqq? What of those who don?t wish to follow it.
Read theses verses 223-26Do you think 223 is in relation to Quran only? Because 225 refers to? those who believe? and do ?amal salih will be rewarded etc. I think it?s in the contexts of 223.
It just makes me think that those who ?aamanou? are the ones who amanou in the Quran. Maybe i?m not looking at the whole picture because of the idea in my head.
Also it can?t be enough for me to just be a ?muslim? because I believe in the Quran, so I?d be a ?fasiq? if I didn?t follow it (Read 299). It would also reflect ingratitude... so not good things.
Ajr, Allahu alem if it?s in dunya or akhira though you say it would say ?fid dunya? if it was for dunya only... but then in that case, i could argue my case of amanou refers to the believes of Quran would be right because it doesn?t explicitly say who the amanou?s are except in some instances; the verse i mentioned before 262 and 569. (I?m not sure if it?s used in different ayats I didn?t search yet)
San
Muqeen? You mean muttaqeen (Almuttaqiyn)? I don't know about the highest level of Imaan, but yea i agree it surely ranks among the highest. Whether it's Almuttaqiyn or AlmuHsiniyn (or else) which ranks the highest, you'll find their descriptions in AQ intersect with each other. (btw 4914-15 ends with AlSaAdiquwn and i can't find muttaqiyn in them--sure you quoted the right verse number?)
I think it is mutaqeen 4913 says ? ?
So as far as i am aware the best of us are the ones who attaqi allah, so would be the muttaqeen (Correct me if I?m wrong)
I think the root is = Ta-Qaf-Ya = to fear, be cautious, guarded, prepared, preserve, forethoughtful, reverential & pious fear (of God), righteous/virtuous/just/honest.
So i guess it may have links to taqwa.
Jack
ok i guess ?ahlel kitab? can be muttaqeen.What do you mean about iman being literal or not? the verse about many of them believing in jinn, the question there is what is jinn seeming they believed in jinn. I don?t see why belief can?t be taken literal.
Badar
your wording kind of confused me..The belief of doing good works, monotheism and other concepts could well truly be accepted by people. However, Quran is more than just concepts. It has ?laws? which people would not accept, it has a message that people may not accept. Overall, generally speaking all people agree on goodness, it doesn?t mean they believe in AlQuran.
-
Peace,
Peace, Jack
Hence i said they intersect with each other, the group/set is just a way to see it in particular. When GOD calls "Yaa ayyuha Alladiyna Aamanuw", whoever think of himself as mu'min will think they're called. Consider that as an imaginary or mathematical group/set. Not a group of people under the banner of "mu'miniyn". That indeed doesn't make sense.
Sure...I can see where you are going with this.
Let's continue that a little further
23 Alladiyna yu'minuwna bi'lGaybi wa yuqiymuwna 'lSalaAta wa mimmaA razaqnaA hum yunfiquwn
Who believe in the unseen, establish AlSalaAt, and of what We have provided for them they spend out24 w Alladiyna yu'minuwna bimaA Unzila Ilayka wa maA Unzila min qablika wa bi'lAaHirati hum yuwqinuwn
And who believe in what has been revealed to you and what was revealed before you, and of the Hereafter they are certain.That is how we understand Almuttaqiyn from these early verses.
Almuttaqiyn do believe in the unseen and establish AlSalaAt and spend out
Almuttaqiyn, in addition to our previous understanding of Almuttaqiyn, do believe in what has been revealed to them and what was revealed before them and certain of the HereafterOk. Here's how I read these verses. Would you agree that 25-6 kafireen are being contrasted with mutaqeen? So the subject is still the mutaqeen. If we keep reading...28 contrasts munafiqeen with mumineen (not muttaqeen). Where are mumineen mentioned before this verse? How come all the sudden they have entered the picture? That's my logic here.
317 is another excellent example on how various other characters/roles/states/aspects are used to describe another character/state. The context of the verse must be studied to understand what character/state is being described. (hint 315). Either you see it that way (the latter explaining the former) or another (the former explaining the latter), your understanding of all of those characters/states would increase collectively (mentioned the concepts of ittaquw, `ibad, jannah, Imaan, IstiGfar, Sabr, Sadiq, qanit, infaq).
True, the context must always be studied. 315 is not the context. The context is an-nas, if you start from the beginning of the chapter, as these verses are speaking directly to us.
944 Those who believe in Allah and the Last Day would not ask permission of you to be excused from striving with their wealth and their lives. And Allah is Knowing of those who fear Him (Almuttaqiyn).
To understand why Almuttaqiyn is used to end this verse, let's see 2177, which includes believe in Allah and the Last Day. Those were informed to us to be parts of what Almuttaqiyn do. So, by including the word Almuttaqiyn in the verse 944, don't you think Allah reminded us of a concept more complete than that described in 944?
But the address is ya-ayuhallatheena-aminoo (93. furthermore, mumineen also strive with their money and lives... (941). Muttaqeen are not alone in believing in Allah and last day (262 for instance).
Now finally, re "synonymously", let me ask you something, Jack
-
If we took muttaqiyn and mu'minuwn as synonym, how can we learn something new from each?
-
Why there are two distinct words used if they are indeed synonym?
Peace
- This is exactly HOW we learn something new from each. You see the quran has concepts that are supposed to be studied in detail. It's quiet easy to take the quran out of context, if you are lazy and don't have a pure heart/mind. This is why we are meant to study these ideas in depth. Working for our food, as it were. Another example is kafireen, who are also thalimeen (2254), amongst other synonyms...
- See above. Additionally, A good author repeats the same concepts and articulates it using different terminology. Notice, for example, how the same stories are repeated, but worded differently. Parts make up the whole.
Jack
What do you mean about iman being literal or not? the verse about many of them believing in jinn, the question there is what is jinn seeming they believed in jinn. I don?t see why belief can?t be taken literal.
I am not saying that belief is not literal per se. My points concerning that verse are as follows
A) How is most of humanity believers in the jinn, if most don't even know who they are?
b) Doesn't this show your iman is shown through your actions, and thus, is not a superficial thing? Think about HOW most of humanity are believers in the jinn. Can I say 'i believe in the quran' and go around murdering people? Do I still believe in the quran, if I go against its teachings? Actions show one's TRUE beliefs.
c)Is 3441 limited to any time in 'history'? Another words, this verse applies to people before the advent of the quran.Rejecting the quran would be rejecting its teachings. In order for one to reject its teachings, one must receive the message, as it was intended. If I, for example, encountered a bad translation, and I rejected 'the quran' based on that, did I really reject the quran, or insert translator's name here's VERSION of the quran?
-
-
Peace,
Peace,
Sure...I can see where you are going with this.
)
Ok. Here's how I read these verses. Would you agree that 25-6 kafireen are being contrasted with mutaqeen? So the subject is still the mutaqeen.
Actually, while i agree that those who are of course opposing both Almu'miniyn and Almuttaqiyn, the verse 26 itself is clear
26
Indeed, those who kafaruw - it is all the same for them whether you warn them or do not warn them - they will not believe.
the kafaruw is contrasted with "yu'minuwn" -- instead of "yattaquwn", for example. So i would say that i disagree on your first question. The subject in the verse, in my humble opinion, could very well be the "alladiyna kafaruw" themselves. In a slightly bigger view 22-8, the subjects are more than just muttaqiyn.
If you asked Would you agree that 25-6 kafireen are being contrasted to both mutaqeen and mu'miniyn? instead, i'd answer 'Yes, i agree.'
If we keep reading...28 contrasts munafiqeen with mumineen (not muttaqeen). Where are mu'mineen mentioned before this verse? How come all the sudden they have entered the picture? That's my logic here.
Would you agree, for example, that Almu'minuwn/Almu'miniyn/Alladina Amanuw/Iman/yu'minuwn are actors and the actions? Would you agree that the actor is not separable from the action?
If you agree, then please read on.
Actually the word munafiqeen itself has not been introduced here. Introduced is the concept of
And of the people are some who say, "We believe in Allah and the Last Day," but they are not with believers..Their action is only "say", which i would say is not even a part of the action of "Iman" (which is in the heart/inner).
So, there is no need for specific word mu'miniyn. The verse itself talks about those who says about Iman but they are not with mu'miniyn. Please also observe the beginning of the the verse "wa minan-nas..." Compare to the verses before. Is it still talking about muttaqiyn? On this verse, I think no, not necessarily.
Let's see the transitions
22 This is the Book about which there is no doubt, a guidance for those conscious of Allah - (Almuttaqiyn)
23 Who believe in the unseen, establish AlSalaAt, and of what We have provided for them they spend out
24 w Alladiyna yu'minuwna bimaA Unzila Ilayka wa maA Unzila min qablika wa bi'lAaHirati hum yuwqinuwn
And who believe in what has been revealed to you and what was revealed before you, and of the Hereafter they are certain.25 Uwla Ika ...
Those are upon guidance from their Lord, and it is those who are the successful.... Is that not a 'stop sign' from referencing to Almuttaqiyn?
26 Indeed, those who kafaruw - it is all the same for them whether you warn them or do not warn them - they will not believe.
new subject alladiyna kafaruw ... not believe (laA yu'minuwn)
27 .... wa lahum ...
Allah has set a seal upon their hearts and upon their hearing, and over their vision is a veil. And for them is a great punishment.... Is that not a 'stop sign' from referencing to alladiyna kafaruw?
28 And of the mankind are some who say, "We believe in Allah and the Last Day," but they are not believers.
... where did mu'miniyn came?
...why not ask where did reference to iman (alladiyna amanu/yu'minuwn/...) came?
compare this one to 26 and 23-4. Relationship?23-4 talks about some aspects of belief/iman in addition to other aspects of taqwa/almuttaqiyn
26 talks about people who just covered it -- they won't believe/la yu'minuwn.
28 talks about people who say they believe but they are actually not with believers
Aren't 29-20 talking about the people in 28? Let's follow up
28 Wa minan-nas...
221 Ya ayyuhan-nas...
O mankind, worship your Lord, who created you and those before you, that you may become righteous (tattaquwn)True, the contrast in 28 itself was against mu'miniyn. And then in 221 (after extensive description about 28 ) ALLAH tells mankind to become tattaquwn??
Isn't it because the concept of taqwa is more than that of iman? Or in other words, that the concept of taqwa is a superset of that of iman?
...t.b. continued on next post
(ed funny incident -- "2" instead of "28 )" )
-
...continued from previous post
True, the context must always be studied. 315 is not the context. The context is an-nas, if you start from the beginning of the chapter, as these verses are speaking directly to us.
What is a context? Isn't it the surrounding of a text? How far or how near we would define the "surrounding"?
If the context is an-nas, then does that mean there can't be a subcontext of an-nas?
But the address is ya-ayuhallatheena-aminoo (93. furthermore, mumineen also strive with their money and lives... (941).
True. Even in 944 it is still started with those who believe. AFAIK, There is not a single call ya-ayuhallatheena-attaqoo.
Who are called to "Ittaquw!"? An-nas or allatheena-amanoo.Strive with their money and lives = jahiduw ... This is another concept of action. The actor of jihad is mujahid.
Who's being called to "jahiduw!"? Right, mu'mineen/allatheena-aminoo.Muttaqeen are not alone in believing in Allah and last day (262 for instance).
But weren't you the one who said previously, 'muttaqeen, almuhsinyn etc are not specific groups?', which i have agreed upon (except on the 'aspects of a mumin' part)?
Muttaqeen, almuhsynin etc are not specific groups, they are states, aspects of a mumin.
True, that the muttaqiyn must have been mu'miniyn (i.e. believing in Allah and last day, among other concepts to believe in), does not mean that the only ones who believe are muttaqiyn.
And it is important to note that also does not mean that every mu'min has taqwa.
Please consider this
Do all mu'min have iman? Obviously yes. mu'min is the actor. iman is the act.
Do all mu'min have taqwa?Do all muttaqin have iman? Since the beginning of Quran it is said that muttaqin are those who have iman so, yes.
Do all muttaqin have taqwa? Obviously yes. muttaqin is the actor. taqwa is the act.Why does ALLAH tell the mu'miniyn/alladina Amanuw to "Ittaquw", if all mu'miniyn already/always have taqwa?
Similarly, why does ALLAH tell the mu'miniyn/alladina Amanuw to do "Amilu AlSaliHat", if all mu'miniyn already/always do amilu SaliHat?
See, for example, someone who just have believed in Allah and the Last Day and have done nothing else? Is he a mu'min? He is beginning to be a mu'min, i'd say. Is he a muttaqiyn? No, he's not even yet a "complete" mu'min.
Then when he already believed all the concepts needed to be believed to be a mu'min, he is now a mu'min. Is he a muttaqiyn? Not necessarily. He must do the actions of taqwa to be a muttaqiyn.
-
This is exactly HOW we learn something new from each. You see the quran has concepts that are supposed to be studied in detail. It's quiet easy to take the quran out of context, if you are lazy and don't have a pure heart/mind. This is why we are meant to study these ideas in depth. Working for our food, as it were. Another example is kafireen, who are also thalimeen (2254), amongst other synonyms...
-
See above. Additionally, A good author repeats the same concepts and articulates it using different terminology. Notice, for example, how the same stories are repeated, but worded differently.
Parts make up the whole.
Thank you for that last expression. I agree 100% on that.
The Best Author, in my humble opinion, repeats the same concepts and adds new information regarding the concepts or presents new relationship between concepts each time He repeats the previously presented concepts.
The Best Author, in my humble opinion, meant every term as specific to its own concept.
I should have asked this from the start what does "synonymous" mean to you?
One can be a muslim, and a mu'min, and a muttaqiyn, and a muHsin. Does that make "muslim" synonym to "mu'min", and to "muttaqiyn", and to "muHsin"?
Peace
-
-
Jack
What is jinn firstly? How do you see it? (you can ignore this if you like, read on)
People can believe without knowing necessarily what it is identified as. Ok, that kinda makes no sense... let me try share some examples.
When children learn for example, they see a cat it has four legs, it has fur. They then see a dog and think ?cat? because it contains the same characteristics of fur + 4 legs but it?s not a cat, we know it?s not because a dog barks a cat doesn?t. so the child accommodates their knowledge to something else and calls it ?cat? then when new knowledge is learnt, they learn ah it barks it must be a ?dog? not a cat because someone identified that for them or they learnt that somehow... so their knowledge assimilates. Possibly adults are the same in some instances we may identify things as we know it until shown a different meaning.
Ok maybe that was a lame example think about people who believe in superstitions they dunno why but they think ?what if? so they believe them. They dunno what it is or what it exactly means but they believe in them.
Belief doesn?t have to be logical.
And yes iman can be shown through our actions i agree, no it?s not a superficial thing. But let me tell you, I can believe in AlQuran i can believe in the laws i can be a muslim and i can ?choose? to let me desires/wishes/whims control me even though i ?still believe? in the Quran. My actions may not show true reflections of my belief but i could still believe yet my desires/wishes/whims control me or rather i would let them control me however i still believe.
You mentioned killing, i could kill someone and feel guilt that i did an evil deed and that i?m going to be punished. I could still believe in Quran and still do bad. I think it would just have a really bad psychological toll.
Rejecting the quran would be rejecting its teachings. In order for one to reject its teachings, one must receive the message, as it was intended. If I, for example, encountered a bad translation, and I rejected 'the quran' based on that, did I really reject the quran, or insert translator's name here's VERSION of the quran?
We?re all on a learning boat, it might be possible that i?m misunderstanding the message ?as it was intended?. I can?t simply agree with a translator or base my findings by one person esp if i know language is much more complex than this. but yeh, people can be biased based on how they understand Quran due to someone?s interpretation. Though if someone tries to say, prove a misconception and they don?t look into it or intentionally ignore it. I?d think that?s somewhat arrogant. Besides that, i think people can get an overall idea through translations.
-
San
In relation to 221 I?m not sure if taqwa is a superset of iman but the verse indicates ibadah?s purpose is to gain taqwa.
Who are called to "Ittaquw!"? An-nas or allatheena-amanoo.
Nas are part of those who allatheeena amanoo. Unless you think you?re not an insan. Why wouldn?t those who amanoo follow the ?ittaquw? commands?
Why does ALLAH tell the mu'miniyn/alladina Amanuw to "Ittaquw", if all mu'miniyn already/always have taqwa?
Similarly, why does ALLAH tell the mu'miniyn/alladina Amanuw to do "Amilu AlSaliHat", if all mu'miniyn already/always do amilu SaliHat?
See, for example, someone who just have believed in Allah and the Last Day and have done nothing else? Is he a mu'min? He is beginning to be a mu'min, i'd say. Is he a muttaqiyn? No, he's not even yet a "complete" mu'min.
Then when he already believed all the concepts needed to be believed to be a mu'min, he is now a mu'min. Is he a muttaqiyn? Not necessarily. He must do the actions of taqwa to be a muttaqiyn.
Why do you think Allah would tell the mumineen to ittaqow ?? the whole purpose of Quran is to guide us, is there an infallible human? It is a reminder a dhikr? It?s a guide? We need the reminder?
Why can?t mu?mineen be muttaqeen? Simple because it address mu?mineen and muttaqiyn? Couldn?t it be siffat? Attributes of a mumin? Couldn?t they be aspects of being a mu`mineen or maybe abdulquran?s theory comes to play; the muttaqeen being the highest level. Though i?m not sure if i agree. Akram doesn?t necessary mean best and i?m not sure if it?s in relation to ?iman? but rather deeds.
salam
-
San
In relation to 221 I?m not sure if taqwa is a superset of iman but the verse indicates ibadah?s purpose is to gain taqwa.
And taqwa is ...?
Nas are part of those who allatheeena amanoo.
CORRECTION i would say that the set AlNaas intersect the set Allatheena Amanuw.
Why wouldn?t those who amanoo follow the ?ittaquw? commands? Why do you think Allah would tell the mumineen to ittaqow ?? the whole purpose of Quran is to guide us, is there an infallible human? It is a reminder a dhikr? It?s a guide? We need the reminder?
Despite the strange question marks, i agree with those sentences. Please see http//www.quran.com/search/ittaqoo for a little bit of research
Why can?t mu?mineen be muttaqeen?
who said that?
being a mu'miniyn is the first step to be a muttaqiyn. 22-4, 2177 exemplify that (sorry these two are the easiest numbers i could remember, please research)
Simple because it address mu?mineen and muttaqiyn? Couldn?t it be siffat? Attributes of a mumin? Couldn?t they be aspects of being a mu`mineen or maybe abdulquran?s theory comes to play; the muttaqeen being the highest level. Though i?m not sure if i agree. Akram doesn?t necessary mean best and i?m not sure if it?s in relation to ?iman? but rather deeds.
Siffat, or Amal (Action/deeds)?
Rather than attributes/siffat/aspects, actually i prefer the words act, action, actor, interaction. Because acts are simply more directive for believers.
It could be that muttaqiyn is indeed the highest level (I too must research far more comprehensively to be sure), but the highest level of what?
Wouldn't it be more productive to study the actions of each name/concept (of actors in plural form), so we can practice them in real world -- instead of theoretical stuff like 'the highest' of something? Hence why i listed in my previous post, some of the name/concepts of those actors. So we would have a clue on what act we already know and practiced and what act we must still learn and practice.
Salaam,
CORRECTION on the 'Annas part of allatheena amanoo'
-
Re 221
Nice catch on the taqwa front. See also
http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=15870.0makes a very cool observation about "taqwa" (Ta-Qaf-Ya), in that the verb "ittaqa" primarily meant and essentially means to place between yourself and something you are afraid of something which might protect you by preventing from it reaching you. This, he says, in the Quranic context is ibadah (Ayn-Ba-Dal). He says its meaning of "pious fear" is a developed meaning from the earlier meaning.
Similarly with "ibadah" (commonly translated as worship, but is more akin to servitude). When one serves their master, their sayings and actions are done in accordance to their master's will, but in doing so, the actions/sayings eventually come to take precedence from an outside-looking-in perspective, hence not the mindset but the acts become "ibadah", hence a more ritualistic approach. Hence a subtle shift to translations using "worship".
