Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. Inheritance according to Qur?an

Inheritance according to Qur?an

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
1.0k Posts 45 Posters 162.0k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • N Offline
    N Offline
    Noon_waalqalami
    wrote on last edited by
    #221

    Did you notice some difference between the two red. Do you know what is the difference between both?
    And do you know the reason why at some places there is Tanween while at others there is only one vowel sign?

    If you do not know such elementary things about Arabic your criticism of all the translators seems ridiculous boast.

    Mazhar -- you were clearly proven wrong on this topic and instead of correcting yourself and apologizing for wasting my time and spamming this thread you continue being a hard-head needing to have the last word and contributing absolutely nothing to this thread/topic and now you are grasping for anything to redeem yourself including debating if to use "to/for" which I've already told you use "for" if you like, it makes little difference.

    Now go away! Play with housemaid or whatever.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M Offline
      M Offline
      Mazhar
      wrote on last edited by
      #222

      Mazhar -- you were clearly proven wrong on this topic and instead of correcting yourself and apologizing for wasting my time and spamming this thread you continue being a hard-head needing to have the last word and contributing absolutely nothing to this thread/topic and now you are grasping for anything to redeem yourself including debating if to use "to/for" which I've already told you use "for" if you like, it makes little difference.

      Now go away! Play with housemaid or whatever.

      I know whenever you do not have an argument, you say like this or start reproducing a page length mathematical equations.

      However, I will give you more points to ponder and realize how much you keep missing while jumping to conclusions and start thinking to have become the only scholar on the subject.

      Do you know something about time-line? And do you know time-line in linquistics has a role to determine and understand a text when time adverbs are used therein?

      Have you found any time adverb in Inheritance discourse? Did you give a second to understand it?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Offline
        M Offline
        Mazhar
        wrote on last edited by
        #223

        Did you notice some difference between the two red. Do you know what is the difference between both?
        And do you know the reason why at some places there is Tanween while at others there is only one vowel sign?

        If you do not know such elementary things about Arabic your criticism of all the translators seems ridiculous boast.

        Take your time. Study further and come back if you have understood the difference. Believe me it will make you to think for some other alternative than switching "for" to "to" to make the verse serve your purpose because it exposed you instead of helping support your inference.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • N Offline
          N Offline
          Noon_waalqalami
          wrote on last edited by
          #224

          Take your time. Study further and come back if you have understood the difference. Believe me it will make you to think for some other alternative than switching "for" to "to" to make the verse serve your purpose because it exposed you instead of helping support your inference.

          OK this is a thread on inheritance and if you want to open a thread on housemaids or to/for go right ahead.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Offline
            M Offline
            Mazhar
            wrote on last edited by
            #225

            OK this is a thread on inheritance and if you want to open a thread on housemaids or to/for go right ahead.

            Yes this is about Inheritance. The points raised are in respect of your semblence verses about "to" and "for". But they were different. The question is relevant about that. Please come back with an answer.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • N Offline
              N Offline
              Noon_waalqalami
              wrote on last edited by
              #226

              Yes this is about Inheritance. The points raised are in respect of your semblence verses about "to" and "for". But they were different. The question is relevant about that. Please come back with an answer.

              OK you're free to choose whichever you like; "to" comes out better and using "for" still does not help you...

              457 woe to each liar flagrant
              411 . and to their parents to each one of them the sixth

              433 and to each (individual; noun) We made/appointed heirs (plural) from what left the parents and the close relatives and the ones who pledged your right hands so give them their share indeed The God is over each a thing Witness

              2148 and to each (individual; noun)
              6132 and to each (individual; noun) degrees from what they have done (plural) and not your Lord unaware of what they have done (plural)
              734 and to each (individual; noun) tribe/nation a term
              1047 and to each (individual; noun) tribe/nation a messenger
              137 and to each (individual; noun) community a guide
              2234 and to each (individual; noun) tribe/nation We made/appointed a rite
              4619 and to each (individual; noun) degrees from what they have done (plural)

              Now your turn; I'll ask once again -- do not waste my time and like a coward avoid, divert, and run away...

              Individuals are made/appointed/entitled as heirs from what left their parents, etc. and not as you infer/read that each individual is guaranteed three or more heirs which is easily proven a false reading and a contradiction simply by finding only one case since the beginning of humanity (~ 57 million people leave us each year or ~155,000 each day) where someone died and left less than three heirs or simply examine each kalalah case ...

              4176 they seek your ruling say The God gives you a ruling in al-kalalah

              Now distribute the shares or go away!

              mother, father
              mother, son
              mother, daughter
              mother, sister
              mother, brother
              mother, wife
              mother, husband
              father, son
              father, daughter
              father, sister
              father, brother
              father, wife
              father, husband
              son, daughter
              son, sister
              son, brother
              son, wife
              son, husband
              daughter, sister
              daughter, brother
              daughter, wife
              daughter, husband
              sister, brother
              sister, wife
              sister, husband
              brother, wife
              brother, husband

              mother, father, son
              mother, father, daughter
              mother, father, wife
              mother, father, husband
              mother, father, sister
              mother, father, brother
              mother, son, daughter
              mother, son, wife
              mother, son, husband
              mother, son, sister
              mother, son, brother
              mother, daughter, wife
              mother, daughter, husband
              mother, daughter, sister
              mother, daughter, brother
              mother, wife, sister
              mother, wife, brother
              mother, husband, sister
              mother, husband, brother
              mother, sister, brother
              father, son, daughter
              father, son, wife
              father, son, husband
              father, son, sister
              father, son, brother
              father, daughter, wife
              father, daughter, husband
              father, daughter, sister
              father, daughter, brother
              father, wife, sister
              father, wife, brother
              father, husband, sister
              father, husband, brother
              father, sister, brother
              son, daughter, wife
              son, daughter, husband
              son, daughter, sister
              son, daughter, brother
              son, wife, sister
              son, wife, brother
              son, husband, sister
              son, husband, brother
              son, sister, brother
              daughter, wife, sister
              daughter, wife, brother
              daughter, husband, sister
              daughter, husband, brother
              daughter, sister, brother
              wife, sister, brother
              husband, sister, brother

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M Offline
                M Offline
                Mazhar
                wrote on last edited by
                #227

                Reply 218

                Did you notice some difference between the two red. Do you know what is the difference between both?
                And do you know the reason why at some places there is Tanween while at others there is only one vowel sign?

                If you do not know such elementary things about Arabic your criticism of all the translators seems ridiculous boast.

                Remaining truthful to habit, you again repeated the Ayah and lengthy math page without using brain to attend to question.

                457 woe to each liar flagrant
                411 . and to their parents to each one of them the sixth

                433 and to each (individual; noun) We made/appointed heirs (plural) from what left the parents and the close relatives and the ones who pledged your right hands so give them their share indeed The God is over each a thing Witness

                457

                433

                Do you see the difference? Vowel signs is double in 433, in others it is single?

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M Offline
                  M Offline
                  Mazhar
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #228

                  These are your trasnslation and then explanation

                  and to each(individual; noun) We made/appointed heirs

                  Individuals are made/appointed/entitled as heirs from what left their parents, etc. and not as you infer/read that each individual is guaranteed three or more heirs which is easily proven a false reading

                  See both. Why are you making mockery of yourself that you do not know even simple English?

                  Your translation says

                  "We have appointed heirs to each individual".

                  Get out of your madness to know what is there in the Verses about inheritance.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • N Offline
                    N Offline
                    Noon_waalqalami
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #229

                    Get out of your madness to know what is there in the Verses about inheritance.

                    Mazhar -- I asked you to stay on topic, do not spam this thread; instead you post useless information.

                    You said that Allah said that each person will have three or more heirs -- that is proven false and a lie!

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • M Offline
                      M Offline
                      Mazhar
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #230

                      Mazhar -- I asked you to stay on topic, do not spam this thread; instead you post useless information.

                      You said that Allah said that each person will have three or more heirs -- that is proven false and a lie!

                      Your own translation says they are more than two. Reconcile your translation and respond to basic contradictions of yours.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • N Offline
                        N Offline
                        Noon_waalqalami
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #231

                        Your own translation says they are more than two. Reconcile your translation and respond to basic contradictions of yours.

                        No it does not -- each individual is heir. Only way translation cannot contradict reality. it's same as...

                        6132 and to each (individual; noun) degrees from what they have done (plural; i.e. each individual) and not your Lord unaware of what they have done (plural; i.e. each individual)

                        In summary, like saying We made you each heirs entitled to a share from what left their parents, etc. not as you claim that Qur'an contradicts reality and each will have at least three heirs -- that is ridiculous!

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • M Offline
                          M Offline
                          Mazhar
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #232

                          No it does not -- each individual is heir.

                          It is time to take admission in KG in some good English medium school.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • M Offline
                            M Offline
                            Mazhar
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #233

                            My dear Noon,

                            Peace

                            If you are really interested to get complete picture and perception of Inheritance discourse, I have simplified the Article, best trying to make it reader friendly but not allowing him to float on the surface of the text, rather keep using his own intellect at every parargraph to grasp it before moving to next and agree or prove it wrong, in any sense, language, grammar, context, concordance.

                            The points towards I have been trying to draw your attention, like tanween and time-line---use of time adverb I have covered therein.

                            Allah the Exalted has covered all, even if there are hundreds of ground situations, in just five sub classifications. You can have hundreds of mathematical equations by just referring to those 5 classifications.

                            You might also notice the beauty of succintness by superb choice of words in the Ayah which could cover multiple situations. Please do pay attention to the meanings and perceptions by noticing what type of a word is it.

                            Daughter not Son is the central theme of Inheritance. It is incumbent upon death expecting wealthy person to bequeath for the Mother and Father; and nearer relatives.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • N Offline
                              N Offline
                              Noon_waalqalami
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #234

                              My dear Mazhar,

                              You are a dumb OX devoid of simple logic and you wrote stupid article.
                              You are clueless on simple distributions; you run away from questions.
                              You distribute shares to son when it clearly says 2/3 is to females only.

                              Qur'an is for people of intelligence not for stupid cattle without a brain!

                              Goodbye!

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • M Offline
                                M Offline
                                Mazhar
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #235

                                Noon,

                                Do open it and read it carefully. Don't be childish, take some time reading it, and then come back if you find objection on any para. Just quote para No. and what you say about it.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • N Offline
                                  N Offline
                                  Noon_waalqalami
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #236

                                  Noon,

                                  Do open it and read it carefully. Don't be childish, take some time reading it, and then come back if you find objection on any para. Just quote para No. and what you say about it.

                                  No one should waste time reading your stupid stuff. Stop spamming/polluting this thread.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • M Offline
                                    M Offline
                                    Mazhar
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #237

                                    No one should waste time reading your stupid stuff. Stop spamming/polluting this thread.

                                    Allah the Exalted has covered all, even if there are hundreds of ground situations, in just five sub classifications. You can have hundreds of mathematical equations by just referring to those 5 classifications.

                                    Daughter not Son is the central theme of Inheritance. It is incumbent upon death expecting wealthy person to bequeath for the Mother and Father; and nearer relatives.

                                    Admin attention please! Placing of this thread under sticky by some was a mere reflexive fascination by lengthy table. It should be a cause of concern for the Administrator of the Forum as many visitors will think that this ridiculous thread by a person who does not know ABC of Arabic, even its vowel, has the approval and agreement of Free Minds. Should we give impression to general public how poor is Free Minds in Arabic and yet claims "Qur'aan alone"!!!

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • M Offline
                                      M Offline
                                      Mazhar
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #238

                                      Admn Pl look into this

                                      Yes this topic should be a sticky; it teaches logic, how to read Qur'an using cross-reference and context to extrapolate certain words and to take the best non-contradicting meaning.

                                      He translates one word at two places in the same Ayah which are identical in all aspects, both in nominative case and absolute state , once masculine son, and then says it is genderless--any gender?

                                      Is this the way we on this widely visited forum interpret Qur'aan making even mockery of word "logic"?

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • N Offline
                                        N Offline
                                        Noon_waalqalami
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #239

                                        Allah the Exalted has covered all, even if there are hundreds of ground situations, in just five sub classifications.

                                        Yes, I've answered all combinations while you write stupid rants, are a coward, and don't answer questions.

                                        Thread is distributing shares according to Qur'an; either provide alternative distributions or stop spamming!

                                        Here are all combinations for reference; obviously sole inheritor gets the whole, no need for arbitration laws.

                                        411 directs you The God in your children to the male like share the two (feminine)...

                                        son/s + daughter/s distribute at 21 ratio male to female = 1

                                        411 ... so if kunna/are nisa above two falahunna/so to them (feminine plural) thulutha (2/3) what left

                                        and if kanat/is (feminine) one so to her the half

                                        and to their parents to each one from them the sixth from what left if kana/is (masculine) to person walad/son (if male child/born)

                                        so if not was to person waladun/offspring/child born and heirs person?s parents (if only parents) so to his mother the third

                                        so if kana/is (masculine singular) to person ikh'wat (if male sibling/brother) so to his mother the sixth

                                        from after a will have made in it or judgment your fathers and your children not you know which of them closer to you benefit obligation from The God indeed The God is Knowing Wise

                                        1 father + 0 sibling/s = 1

                                        1/3 mother + 2/3 father = 1
                                        1/6 mother + 5/6 brother/s = 1

                                        1/6 mother/father + 5/6 son/s = 1
                                        1/6 mother + 1/6 father + 2/3 son/s = 1

                                        1 daughter 1/2 + 1/2 mother/father = 1
                                        2 daughters + mother/father equally = 1
                                        3 daughters 2/3 + 1/3 mother/father = 1

                                        1 daughter 1/2 + 1/4 mother + 1/4 father = 1
                                        2 daughters + mother + father all equally = 1
                                        3 daughters 2/3 + 1/6 mother + 1/6 father = 1

                                        1/6 mother/father + 5/6 (daughter/s + son/s) 21 ratio male to female = 1

                                        411 kalalah fatherless and spouseless no son (sibling/s variable/unstated)
                                        1 daughter 1/2 + 1/2 (mother + sister/s) = 1
                                        1 daughter 1/2 + 1/6 mother + 1/3 brother/s = 1
                                        1 daughter 1/2 + 1/6 mother + 1/3 (sister/s + brother/s) = 1

                                        2 daughters + mother + sister/s (all share equally) = 1
                                        2 daughters + brother/s 5/6 share equally + 1/6 mother = 1
                                        2 daughters + brother/s + sister/s 5/6 share equally + 1/6 mother = 1

                                        3 daughters 2/3 + 1/3 (mother + sister/s) = 1
                                        3 daughters 2/3 + 1/6 mother + 1/6 brother/s = 1
                                        3 daughters 2/3 + 1/6 mother + 1/6 (sister/s + brother/s) = 1

                                        1 daughter 1/2 + 1/2 sister/s = 1
                                        1 daughter 1/2 + 1/2 brother/s = 1
                                        1 daughter 1/2 + 1/2 (sister/s + brother/s) = 1

                                        2 daughters + sister/s = 1
                                        2 daughters + brother/s = 1
                                        2 daughters + sister/s + brother/s = 1

                                        3 daughters 2/3 + 1/3 sister/s = 1
                                        3 daughters 2/3 + 1/3 brother/s = 1
                                        3 daughters 2/3 + 1/3 (sister/s + brother/s) = 1

                                        412 and to you half what left your spouse?s if not was to them waladun/offspring/child

                                        so if kana is (masculine) to them walad/son (if is male child/born) so to you the fourth

                                        from what they left from after a will they made in it or judgment

                                        and to them the fourth from what you left if not was to you waladun/offspring/child

                                        so if kana is (masculine) to you walad/son (i.e. if to person male child/born) falahunna/so to them the eight

                                        from what you left from after a will you made in it or judgment...

                                        1 spouse + 0 sibling/s = 1

                                        1/4 husband + 3/4 son/s = 1
                                        1/8 wife + 7/8 son/s = 1

                                        1 daughter 1/2 + 1/2 spouse = 1
                                        2 daughters + spouse equally = 1
                                        3 daughters 2/3 + 1/3 spouse = 1

                                        1/2 husband + 1/2 mother/father = 1
                                        1/4 wife + 3/4 mother/father = 1

                                        1/2 husband + 1/4 mother + 1/4 father = 1
                                        1/4 wife + 3/8 mother + 3/8 father = 1

                                        1/6 mother/father + 1/4 husband + 7/12 son/s = 1
                                        1/6 mother/father + 1/8 wife + 17/24 son/s = 1

                                        1 daughter 1/2 + 1/4 mother/father + 1/4 spouse = 1
                                        2 daughters + mother/father + spouse all equally = 1
                                        3 daughters 2/3 + 1/6 mother/father + 1/6 spouse = 1

                                        1/6 mother + 1/6 father + 1/4 husband + 5/12 son/s = 1
                                        1/6 mother + 1/6 father + 1/8 wife + 13/24 son/s = 1

                                        1 daughter 1/2 + 1/6 mother + 1/6 father + 1/6 spouse = 1
                                        2 daughters + mother + father + spouse (share equally) = 1
                                        3 daughters 2/3 + 1/9 mother + 1/9 father + 1/9 spouse = 1

                                        1/4 husband + 3/4 (daughter/s + son/s) 21 ratio male to female = 1

                                        1/6 mother/father + 1/4 husband + 7/12 (daughter/s + son/s) 21 ratio male to female = 1
                                        1/6 mother/father + 1/8 wife + 17/24 (daughter/s + son/s) 21 ratio male to female = 1

                                        1/6 mother + 1/6 father + 1/4 husband + 5/12 (daughter/s + son/s) 21 ratio male to female = 1
                                        1/6 mother + 1/6 father + 2/3 children mixed (daughter/s + son/s) 21 ratio male to female = 1

                                        412 kalalah fatherless and spouseless has son; sibling/s fixed at 1/6 or 1/3
                                        412 .. and if is a man inherited kalalah (no crown/head of household; fatherless and spouseless) or woman

                                        and has brother or sister so to each one from them the sixth

                                        so if they were greater from that so they partners in the third

                                        from after a will is recommended in it or judgment not harmful a will from The God and The God Knowing Forbearing

                                        1/6 sister/brother + 5/6 son/s = 1
                                        1/3 sisters/brothers/(sister/s + brother/s) + 2/3 son/s = 1

                                        1/6 sister/brother + 5/6 (daughter/s + son/s) 21 ratio male to female = 1
                                        1/3 sisters/brothers/(sister/s + brother/s) + 2/3 (daughter/s + son/s) 21 ratio male to female = 1

                                        1/6 mother + 1/6 sister/brother + 2/3 son/s = 1
                                        1/6 mother + 1/3 sisters/brothers/(sister/s + brother/s) + 1/2 son/s = 1

                                        1/6 mother + 1/6 sister/brother + 2/3 (daughter/s + son/s) 21 ratio male to female = 1
                                        1/6 mother + 1/3 sisters/brothers/(sister/s + brother/s) + 1/2 (daughter/s + son/s) 21 ratio male to female = 1

                                        4176 al-kalalah the fatherless and spouseless no offspring/child born
                                        4176 they seek your ruling say The God gives you a ruling in al-kalalah (the fatherless and spouseless; deceased left no crown/head of household)

                                        if person died is not to person waladun/offspring/child and has sister so to her half what left and he inherits it if not was to her waladun/offspring/child

                                        so if they were two (feminine) so to them the third twice (2/3) from what left

                                        and if they were ikh'watun/siblings rijal wanisa so to the male like share the two (feminine)

                                        clarifies The God to you lest you stray and The God in every a thing Knowing

                                        1 sister 1/2 + 1/2 mother = 1
                                        2 sisters 2/3 (1/3 each) + 1/3 mother = 1
                                        3 sisters (1/4 each x 3) + 1/4 mother = 1

                                        sister/s + brother/s distribute at 21 ratio male to female = 1
                                        1/6 mother + 5/6 (sister/s + brother/s) distribute at 21 ratio male to female = 1

                                        Admin attention please!

                                        Admin this clueless person is hijacking/spamming this thread to promote his stupid article -- can we do something?

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • M Offline
                                          M Offline
                                          Mazhar
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #240

                                          Admin this clueless person is hijacking/spamming this thread to promote his stupid article -- can we do something?

                                          You are a dumb OX devoid of simple logic and you wrote stupid article. Noon

                                          Learned Noon writes in his Post 127

                                          Peace brother Mazhar,

                                          Well written with slight miss-reading of solitary son and applying "to the male like share the two females" and the females in 411 are alone, otherwise numerous cases math does not add.

                                          The most interesting part of the story is that after having read his premises and responses to few others, I wanted to get him out of his trap and self styled trick with the word which he now called "slight mis-reading of solitary son" in my article. I suggested him that it can be child. He scholarly corrected me earning my thanks.

                                          Post 86. Sorry Noon, I forgot to acknowledge your point regarding Waladun as singular son for reason of Kana. Yes, there it means only son because of masculine deficient verb and it being its Ism-Noun subject.

                                          Noon naively reponded in Post 87

                                          Thank you Mazhar, that was what makes all the calculations work and rather amazing logic.

                                          I got worried. He was behaving like late Rashad Khalifa. I kept confronting him to take him out of that state with simple and evident facts about the Ayaat. But it did not work since he starts reproducing his first lenghty page.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users