Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. SURA FATIHA IS NOT IN THE "ORIGINAL QURAN"

SURA FATIHA IS NOT IN THE "ORIGINAL QURAN"

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
109 Posts 19 Posters 3.0k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    supportpeacenotwar
    wrote on last edited by
    #81

    I second that! Very well said.

    Plus I believe wholeheartedly that Allah promised to preserve the Quran. So it could either mean those old qurans were missing a page, or Allah intended it to be added later on (who knows?). Either way, like Bigmo said, it's irrelevant.

    I feel much the same way. We have to be careful with any type of source that claims to be historical. In fact, hadiths would be a case in point.

    Agreed

    I think it's a consequence of a forum like this to find subjects to exchange ideas about.
    The search for subject matter can lead to many extraneous topics being discussed.
    Like television, the more channels, the better the chance of diluted entertainment.
    As long as we bear in mind that these threads are meant for reflection and not to
    change the fundamental aspects of Islam we should be fine.

    Peace

    I hope you don't mind me asking, but your signature has me intrigued. I searched for it, but it doesn't appear to be a quote? Does it mean that the secret to monotheism can be found while reflecting upon nature? Or is it referring to Jannah or something else?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • P Offline
      P Offline
      PixelAngelBaby
      wrote on last edited by
      #82

      I feel much the same way. We have to be careful with any type of source that claims to be historical. In fact, hadiths would be a case in point.

      Absolutely. By the way, welcome to the forum, from youtube! ). I'm Maddie M.K there, we "chatted" earlier ). I pray you enjoy your stay!

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • S Offline
        S Offline
        supportpeacenotwar
        wrote on last edited by
        #83

        Absolutely. By the way, welcome to the forum, from youtube! ). I'm Maddie M.K there, we "chatted" earlier ). I pray you enjoy your stay!

        Thank you for your warm welcome Maddie! I also pray your stay here is a fruitful one!

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M Offline
          M Offline
          Mazhar
          wrote on last edited by
          #84

          Does it mean that the secret to monotheism can be found while reflecting upon nature?

          Salam,

          Perhaps this is reflected by 221-22

          This first direct address to humanity, comprising thirty eight words, perhaps encompasses entire philosophical pursuit undertaken prior to its revelation till date, and answers simplistically. Philosophy deals among other things with these questions

          Character and general structure of the universe in which we live;

          Is there a permanent element in the constitution of this universe?

          How are we related to it? What place do we occupy in it?

          What is the kind of conduct that befits the place we occupy?

          Ayah 220-21

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • I Offline
            I Offline
            IAMOP
            wrote on last edited by
            #85

            O you the Mankind, listen attentively;

            You demonstrate subservience and allegiance to your Sustainer Lord.

            He the Exalted has created you people, and those who existed before you.

            This demonstrative allegiance might let you people adopt rational conduct avoiding unrestrained moves, in reverence and fear of your Creator and Sustainer Lord.

            Your Sustainer Lord had, for you people, spread out the Earth in the manner of a floor/carpet;

            and the Sky in the manner of an overarching canopy.

            Moreover, He the Exalted descended water from the Sky.

            Thereat, with this Water, He the Exalted brought out a variety of fruits-shrubs, as means of subsistence for you people.

            Therefore, you people should not ascribe and declare others as the likes with reference to Allah the Exalted,

            since you people have logical understanding of there being none alike

            This translation is amazing... I can feel God ringing through the words. Translations don't always manage to do this. A perfect translation from Arabic to English surely would be possible; if one acquired the correct terminology one should be able to create a perfect mathematically equivalent data set transformation between Quran => English & back.

            Thank you very much! A lot of clarification and a certain statement from God that he has created us from another people, meaning that we are evolved beings, this cannot be disputed. Interestingly soil = clay and salsalin kal-faqhar (5514 - Click for Corpus Word Breakdown) is the process/essence by which we originate; physically speaking, water and air resonating through soil produces the human being by means of directed evolution over billions of years. All of what we are made of came from the ground, one long chain of transmission of Ruh. You are a leaf of a 14 billion year old tree of life, perhaps even the crowning flower at the top if all goes well!

            Peace jedi

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • G Offline
              G Offline
              GODsubmitter
              wrote on last edited by
              #86

              Thank you.
              Who's translation it is in green?

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M Offline
                M Offline
                Mazhar
                wrote on last edited by
                #87

                O you the Mankind, listen attentively;

                You demonstrate subservience and allegiance to your Sustainer Lord.

                He the Exalted has created you people, and those who existed before you.

                This demonstrative allegiance might let you people adopt rational conduct avoiding unrestrained moves, in reverence and fear of your Creator and Sustainer Lord.

                Your Sustainer Lord had, for you people, spread out the Earth in the manner of a floor/carpet;

                and the Sky in the manner of an overarching canopy.

                Moreover, He the Exalted descended water from the Sky.

                Thereat, with this Water, He the Exalted brought out a variety of fruits-shrubs, as means of subsistence for you people.

                Therefore, you people should not ascribe and declare others as the likes with reference to Allah the Exalted,

                since you people have logical understanding of there being none alike

                This translation is amazing... I can feel God ringing through the words. Translations don't always manage to do this. A perfect translation from Arabic to English surely would be possible; if one acquired the correct terminology one should be able to create a perfect mathematically equivalent data set transformation between Quran => English & back.

                Thank you very much! A lot of clarification and a certain statement from God that he has created us from another people, meaning that we are evolved beings, this cannot be disputed. Interestingly soil = clay and salsalin kal-faqhar (5514 - Click for Corpus Word Breakdown) is the process/essence by which we originate; physically speaking, water and air resonating through soil produces the human being by means of directed evolution over billions of years. All of what we are made of came from the ground, one long chain of transmission of Ruh. You are a leaf of a 14 billion year old tree of life, perhaps even the crowning flower at the top if all goes well!

                Peace jedi

                The Man History of his coming into being.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • S Offline
                  S Offline
                  supportpeacenotwar
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #88

                  Salam,

                  Perhaps this is reflected by 221-22

                  This first direct address to humanity, comprising thirty eight words, perhaps encompasses entire philosophical pursuit undertaken prior to its revelation till date, and answers simplistically. Philosophy deals among other things with these questions

                  Character and general structure of the universe in which we live;

                  Is there a permanent element in the constitution of this universe?

                  How are we related to it? What place do we occupy in it?

                  What is the kind of conduct that befits the place we occupy?

                  Ayah 220-21

                  Salaam! Thanks, that's a really nice translation. They often don't flow like that. I think it all speaks to our human experience on this Earth and within this Universe and that the order we find is essential to our existence. If this order makes itself, how can it be a mindless process may be one of the points. It may also be referring to the rest of the Earth and saying it follows the laws and just gets on with it. We aren't like that, what are the laws that govern us? And if we think its possible there is a Creator, wouldn't they know, after all they created all these original laws? Sometimes, I find those who argue against Islam think this is all "basic". But, the Quran has to speak to everyone, and sometimes in looking at the most basic of things we find the answer we are looking for because maybe it is quite simple yet still profound.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • H Offline
                    H Offline
                    hawk99
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #89

                    I feel much the same way. We have to be careful with any type of source that claims to be historical. In fact, hadiths would be a case in point.

                    I hope you don't mind me asking, but your signature has me intrigued. I searched for it, but it doesn't appear to be a quote? Does it mean that the secret to monotheism can be found while reflecting upon nature? Or is it referring to Jannah or something else?

                    Peace supportpeacenotwar,

                    My signature is a riddle. The full riddle goes like this

                    The secret of monotheism can be found if you reflect on the garden of eden.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • A Offline
                      A Offline
                      alleycats
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #90

                      Peace Alleycats,

                      Yes Kufi, dialectical markings to preserve a particular pronunciation in writing and verse numbers, etc., were introduced much later. The first 150 years early copies of Qur'an were without vowel marks and dots to distinguish between different letters which look the same when written and one needs to use context and careful cross-reference examination to distinguish correct meaning, e.g.

                      the male/reminder (use context)
                      411 directs you The God in your children lildhakari/to the male like share the two (feminine)
                      159 indeed, We We have descended alththikra/the reminder and indeed for it surely Guardians

                      http//www.unesco-ci.org/photos/showphoto.php/photo/3355/title/highlights3a-letter-po/cat/837
                      End of chapter 9129 and start chapter 101 to verses 103 and part of 104
                      Script Kufi Masahif
                      Copying date 2nd Century
                      http//www.unesco-ci.org/photos/data/837/10big.jpg

                      The only dots are red/green hamza markings as shown below?
                      Qur'an 1st/2nd centuries Chapter 60 part 4 to 8 and part of 9

                      http//oi50.tinypic.com/20hldo0.jpg

                      Salaam and thank you Noon, for taking time to respond to my query, and the beautiful snapshots! But i still have some un-clarity about early Arabic script. I have been wondering, if as you stated, the "dots" of the letters were actually not added until about 150 years later, then WHO decided which letters the Kufic represented?

                      And, were there NEVER the "dots", (not the 'amzah), until the 150 years later??

                      Just to the best of your understanding, i sure would appreciate! Thank you in advance peace

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • N Offline
                        N Offline
                        Noon_waalqalami
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #91

                        Salaam and thank you Noon, for taking time to respond to my query, and the beautiful snapshots! But i still have some un-clarity about early Arabic script. I have been wondering, if as you stated, the "dots" of the letters were actually not added until about 150 years later, then WHO decided which letters the Kufic represented?

                        And, were there NEVER the "dots", (not the 'amzah), until the 150 years later??

                        Just to the best of your understanding, i sure would appreciate! ) Thank you in advance peace

                        Salaam Alleycats, we can clearly see from the old texts there were no dots until much later in history.

                        Who decided which were doted/written to preserve a "certain interpretation" -- whoever had influence.

                        Thus in my translation took out dots/dialectical marks, use cross-reference, context for best meaning.

                        Peace

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • M Offline
                          M Offline
                          Magnus
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #92

                          Not to derail the thread, but I wanted to mention a different view, which I am increasingly leaning towards
                          The actual Quran was never a written document, but is and has been from the very beginning an oral tradition. It is a series of syllables forming words forming sentences conveying meaning, not a series of written letters. Any series of letters written down are to be considered nothing more than a memory aid for the recitation of the syllables that form the words, which in turn form the actual Quran. God sent down words, but no set instructions for how they should be spelled or where the dots should be, if any, I think. As long as the words remain, the Quran is preserved, and how people choose to write the words down or mass-produce them in print in order to remember them have no immediate bearing on what has actually been sent down and preserved by the grace of God.

                          Or something like that. I could be completely wrong of course, but this is the only way I can make any real sense of what the Quran actually is...

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • H Offline
                            H Offline
                            hawk99
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #93

                            Not to derail the thread, but I wanted to mention a different view, which I am increasingly leaning towards
                            The actual Quran was never a written document, but is and has been from the very beginning an oral tradition. It is a series of syllables forming words forming sentences conveying meaning, not a series of written letters. Any series of letters written down are to be considered nothing more than a memory aid for the recitation of the syllables that form the words, which in turn form the actual Quran. God sent down words, but no set instructions for how they should be spelled or where the dots should be, if any, I think. As long as the words remain, the Quran is preserved, and how people choose to write the words down or mass-produce them in print in order to remember them have no immediate bearing on what has actually been sent down and preserved by the grace of God.
                            Or something like that. I could be completely wrong of course, but this is the only way I can make any real sense of what the Quran actually is...

                            Agreed

                            The Quran was memorized by huffaz and was also written, although ancient societies
                            were primarily oral, they excelled at oral memorization which included the fatihah.

                            Like today a popular song, is known by many.

                            The "Book" was revealed to Muhammad's via inspiration, into his very being,
                            not in physical form.

                            Say, "Anyone who opposes Gabriel should know that he has brought
                            down this (Quran) into your heart, in accordance with GOD's will,
                            confirming previous scriptures, and providing guidance and good news for the
                            believers."

                            People before us wanted proof of the Quran in physical form

                            The people of the scripture challenge you to bring down to them
                            a book from the sky! They have asked Moses for
                            more than that, saying, "Show us GOD, physically." Consequently, the lightning
                            struck them, as a consequence of their audacity. Additionally, they worshiped
                            the calf, after all the miracles they had seen. Yet, we pardoned all this. We
                            supported Moses with profound miracles.

                            Even if we sent down to them a physical book, written on paper, and they
                            touched it with their hands, those who disbelieved would have said, "This is no
                            more than clever magic."

                            And as for those who think that there is something wrong or missing from the text,
                            think again!

                            Absolutely, we have revealed the reminder, and, absolutely, we will preserve it.

                            Trust God

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • S Offline
                              S Offline
                              supportpeacenotwar
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #94

                              Peace supportpeacenotwar,

                              My signature is a riddle. The full riddle goes like this

                              The secret of monotheism can be found if you reflect on the garden of eden.

                              Salam, oh, I see. Thanks. Is it meant purely for reflection or is it a riddle with a particular answer?

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • H Offline
                                H Offline
                                hawk99
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #95

                                Salam, oh, I see. Thanks. Is it meant purely for reflection or is it a riddle with a particular answer?

                                Peace supportpeacenotwar,

                                Yes my signature is a riddle/brainteaser/challenge with a particular answer.

                                Here's a hint "There are three major entities in the garden of eden what are they"?

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • S Offline
                                  S Offline
                                  supportpeacenotwar
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #96

                                  Peace supportpeacenotwar,

                                  Yes my signature is a riddle/brainteaser/challenge with a particular answer.

                                  Here's a hint "There are three major entities in the garden of eden what are they"?

                                  Salaam, hawkninetynine,

                                  I'm not that good at stuff like this. I'll probably never get it. P This is likely wrong but in terms of entities all I can think of are the garden itself, human beings (at the start) and the presence of God? I doubt that's it... You're gonna have to spell it out for me, sorry. >.<

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • H Offline
                                    H Offline
                                    hawk99
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #97

                                    Salaam, hawkninetynine,

                                    I'm not that good at stuff like this. I'll probably never get it. This is likely wrong but in terms of entities all I can think of are the garden itself, human beings (at the start) and the presence of God? I doubt that's it... You're gonna have to spell it out for me, sorry. >.<

                                    Peace supportpeacenotwar,

                                    You got two of the three, they are the humans, God and the devil. The relationship
                                    between the three is "the secret to monotheism" no answer required, just something
                                    to reflect about.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • S Offline
                                      S Offline
                                      supportpeacenotwar
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #98

                                      Peace supportpeacenotwar,

                                      You got two of the three, they are the humans, God and the devil. The relationship
                                      between the three is "the secret to monotheism" no answer required, just something
                                      to reflect about.

                                      Salaam hawkninetynine,

                                      Not bad... that's an interesting way of looking at it. Does it mean partly that to understand God we must understand our relationship with God?

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • S Offline
                                        S Offline
                                        supportpeacenotwar
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #99

                                        Salaam hawkninetynine,

                                        Two out of three... not bad... that's an interesting way of looking at it. Does it mean partly that to understand God, in our own limited way, we must understand our relationship with God?

                                        no idea why this quote automatically came up...

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • H Offline
                                          H Offline
                                          hawk99
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #100

                                          Salaam hawkninetynine,
                                          Does it mean partly that to understand God we must understand our relationship with God?

                                          Yes, with God and also with the devil

                                          Peace supportpeacenotwar,

                                          Trust God

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users