Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. This is more reasonable about 33:40

This is more reasonable about 33:40

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
164 Posts 15 Posters 7.7k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Mazhar
    wrote on last edited by
    #121

    The major difference is that all the Messengers were for specific nation and for specific time frame. The distinction of being Universal Messenger for the entire humanity till the last day is with only one. I recognize, honour, and rever all the elevated Messengers of Allah the Exalted, whether I am told their names or notm, because the Universal Messenger has confirmed and authenticated them

    And they used to say amongst themselves "Should we must become abandoners of our various iela'aha gods, deities for a delusional poet?"
    No, they falsely slander; he is neither possessed nor a poet, the fact is that he has come with a Miscellany of Proven-Absolute Facts Grand Qur'aan.
    And he-Muhammad has since verbally affirmed-authenticated all those who were sent as Messengers to various nations in timeline.

    Muna'fi'qeen have problem only with the Last Messenger for which reason they are placed in the lowest part of the Hell-Prison despite their claim of faith.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • H Offline
      H Offline
      huruf
      wrote on last edited by
      #122

      I consider important indeed to make it clear that we consider all prophets, those whose name we know and those whose name we do not know on a pair and even as a unit, and that the fact that Mhammad is called khatam is to underscore that all prophets come under the same union of prophethoo, provided their teachings stand the contrast with the Qur'an. All are a mercy to humankind and all deserve allegiance and respect.

      Salaam

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Offline
        M Offline
        Mazhar
        wrote on last edited by
        #123

        I consider important indeed to make it clear that we consider all prophets, those whose name we know and those whose name we do not know on a pair and even as a unit, and that the fact that Mhammad is called khatam is to underscore that all prophets come under the same union of prophethoo, provided their teachings stand the contrast with the Qur'an. All are a mercy to humankind and all deserve allegiance and respect.

        Salaam

        That is the difference between the true believers and other believers in God, like Jews, christians, Imposter believers.

        It is a certain fact that We had distinguished them as the purest and the sincerest; exclusive example for repeated mentioning in the World.

        And this is a fact that they are in Our judgment certainly the best choice, Elite above others, they are perpetually the best.

        And they all without exception shall remain perpetually the Best Persons.

        It is thus evident from the Root, Verbal Noun, and the peculiar feature of the derived Noun http//haqeeqat.org.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.Tabweeb%20Part%202/001.%20Roots%20originating%20in%20Surat%20002/2.061/250.%20Nabi%20Noon%20Ba%20Waw/1.gif that it refers to those Men who have the permanent attribute of distinctly elevated and exalted above all others in the created realm; dignified and distinguished from all others; the sincerest. Their par excellence attribute is that they are the personal choice of the Creator of all that exists, Allah the Supremely Exalted Who is pleased to pronounce that they are for ever the best selection in the judgment of Him the Exalted.

        They constitute exclusively a Unique Group, distinct and exalted from all members of rational species. We are not given the exact number of Men who are the Members of this Unique Group. However, we are informed that Allah the Exalted has granted distinction to some Members of this Group upon its other Members.
        http//haqeeqat.org.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.Arabic%20Text/017.%20Al%20Israa/017.%20A1.gif
        And fact remains that We have granted unique distinction-peculiarity-individuality to some of the Chosen, Dignified and Exalted Sincere Allegiants upon some others.

        Can a person of ordinary prudence think of more conspicuous distinction of a Member of this Unique Group than him who is declared "The Authenticating Accomplisher of those who are declared Chosen, Dignified and Elevated Sincere Allegiants of Allah the Exalted."?

        The Authenticating Accomplisher of those who are declared Chosen, Dignified and Exalted Sincere Allegiants of Allah the Exalted.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M Offline
          M Offline
          Man_of_Faith
          wrote on last edited by
          #124

          Mazhar,

          I find that you truly work hard to shine excessive light on the prophet Muhammad. To the extent that you insert words and then put verse numbers there as to misguide people into worship of him.

          And you complain about my innocent attempt at simply correcting words that are wrong

          Do you not see your double standard?

          And also you put words in God's "mouth" when you talk about people and say they will end up in the lowest put of Hell. It is surely not you who will put them there in the first place. Inform about the decree and leave the final judgment to God.

          Can you not find more words to glorify Muhammad? Why not take the opportunity to call him god as well!? It looks like that is the direction you would like to see it.

          Reverence is a very strong word and it can be taken equal to worship. Why not say worship Muhammad too while we are at it so that the evil is complete?

          You do not have to say god about Muhammad to make him god, you know.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Offline
            M Offline
            Mazhar
            wrote on last edited by
            #125

            Mazhar,

            I find that you truly work hard to shine excessive light on the prophet Muhammad. To the extent that you insert words and then put verse numbers there as to misguide people into worship of him.

            And you complain about my innocent attempt at simply correcting words that are wrong

            Do you not see your double standard?

            And also you put words in God's "mouth" when you talk about people and say they will end up in the lowest put of Hell. It is surely not you who will put them there in the first place. Inform about the decree and leave the final judgment to God.

            Can you not find more words to glorify Muhammad? Why not take the opportunity to call him god as well!? It looks like that is the direction you would like to see it.

            Reverence is a very strong word and it can be taken equal to worship. Why not say worship Muhammad too while we are at it so that the evil is complete?

            You do not have to say god about Muhammad to make him god, you know.

            033.045
            YUSUFALI O Prophet! Truly We have sent thee as a Witness, a Bearer of Glad Tidings, and Warner,-
            PICKTHAL O Prophet! Lo! We have sent thee as a witness and a bringer of good tidings and a warner.
            SHAKIR O Prophet! surely We have sent you as a witness, and as a bearer of good news and as a warner,

            http//haqeeqat.org.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.Arabic%20Text/033.%20Al%20Ahzaab/33.46.gif

            http//haqeeqat.org.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.Arabic%20Text/033.%20Al%20Ahzaab/33.45a.gif
            033.046
            YUSUFALI And as one who invites to Allah's (grace) by His leave, and as a lamp spreading light. PICKTHAL And as a summoner unto Allah by His permission, and as a lamp that giveth light. SHAKIR And as one inviting to Allah by His permission, and as a light-giving torch.

            And We have sent you as the Inviter who invites people towards Allah the Exalted with His prior permission.
            And We have sent you as a Figure of Unique Prominence with characteristic feature of reflector of Visible Light illuminator and sustainer of the Life.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M Offline
              M Offline
              Man_of_Faith
              wrote on last edited by
              #126

              033.045
              YUSUFALI O Prophet! Truly We have sent thee as a Witness, a Bearer of Glad Tidings, and Warner,-
              PICKTHAL O Prophet! Lo! We have sent thee as a witness and a bringer of good tidings and a warner.
              SHAKIR O Prophet! surely We have sent you as a witness, and as a bearer of good news and as a warner,

              http//haqeeqat.org.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.Arabic%20Text/033.%20Al%20Ahzaab/33.46.gif

              http//haqeeqat.org.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.Arabic%20Text/033.%20Al%20Ahzaab/33.45a.gif
              033.046
              YUSUFALI And as one who invites to Allah's (grace) by His leave, and as a lamp spreading light. PICKTHAL And as a summoner unto Allah by His permission, and as a lamp that giveth light. SHAKIR And as one inviting to Allah by His permission, and as a light-giving torch.

              And We have sent you as the Inviter who invites people towards Allah the Exalted with His prior permission.
              And We have sent you as a Figure of Unique Prominence with characteristic feature of reflector of Visible Light illuminator and sustainer of the Life.

              So what? He returned back to God over 1000 years ago and the words we have here are God's, right? Or do you think that they were his and not of the One who sent him? Now it is God's word that guides us and not Muhammad, because Muhammad is no longer here to guide by God's leave anymore you know. Like I already said "Stop living in the past; stop living in the yesterday".

              Or do you claim that you have a "magic" link to Muhammad right here, right now?

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • H Offline
                H Offline
                huruf
                wrote on last edited by
                #127

                I reject completely both extremes, the one that makes of the preophets and of any particular prophet a kind of amulet or juju, and the one which needs to put prophets or some particular prophet in his place and punish him because the other extreme has played wrongly on his prophethood. Prophets, purified by the most divine light, are beyond those squabbles of warring "believers". They came to serve mankind, they served mankind, they may be serving mankind, they can do without the cult or discult of any would be followers or reformers. They know they are only God's just like that human kind that they came to serve, one with God.

                We like better this or that prophet, personal liking, but faithful we are faithful to all, they all were examples to be followed, and taught the lessons they were given to teach, they were not donkeys carrying a load of books, but pure souls who voluntarily served others disregarding their own wants and need, because their love for God and their belief in God was extreme.

                Mazhar han stick his Capital Men as if God had wherever he finds a proper place. God did not forbid to Himself to send whoever He choses to teach the lessons He wants to teach when He wants. Maryam, as per Qur'an was a prophet and those who disregard belief in His prophets they know what God says. That most prophets mentionned in the Qur'an were men, underscores the fact that many more men than women are very unwilling learners of the lessons God wants us to learn, for reasons which are obvious. Therefore God sent men, over and over and over, and by the look of things He would need tos end still a few thosand more. Because the "gentlement" still believe that prophethood for males is a kind of distinction and not an idictment of their behaviour.

                All this said with all due respect for those males who instead of following the world, to which everything pushes them, choose to follow service and humility. My most sincere respect to them. I have known that in my family and nothing can match the pure love of a believing male who acts accordingly and therefore I have no qualms in rejecting male roguishness and malehood. On the contrary, more reason to not accept the garbage of delusion that other males have of themselves and of their values. They demean their sex.

                We believe in all of them, in all of the prophets, without distinction.

                Salaam

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M Offline
                  M Offline
                  Mazhar
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #128

                  We believe in all of them, in all of the prophets, without distinction.

                  Salam,

                  This is with regard to a statement of true believers quoted in Qur'aan; incorrectly translated

                  We do not seclude a single one in the Galaxy of Messengers.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • M Offline
                    M Offline
                    Mazhar
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #129

                    So what? He returned back to God over 1000 years ago and the words we have here are God's, right? Or do you think that they were his and not of the One who sent him? Now it is God's word that guides us and not Muhammad, because Muhammad is no longer here to guide by God's leave anymore you know. Like I already said "Stop living in the past; stop living in the yesterday".

                    Or do you claim that you have a "magic" link to Muhammad right here, right now?

                    How naive!
                    I responded to this remark

                    I find that you truly work hard to shine excessive light on the prophet Muhammad.

                    I quoted the Ayah and the proclamation of Allah the Exalted on the subject of shining light.
                    Your advice is quite interesting
                    "Stop living in the past; stop living in the yesterday".

                    It is only with reference to when it is about the elevated Messenger sas. Otherwise you are also living in the past since this Book Qur'aan is also of past. More than half of the Book is either addressed to him, advises him to say this or that to people, or talks about him.
                    You are not sure whom this Book Qur'aan was given and who was he who passed on this Book to people reaching in my and your hands, and you mention him in manner reflective of disrespect feelings in heart like this
                    Muhammad (or whatever his name is)

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • M Offline
                      M Offline
                      Man_of_Faith
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #130

                      Mazhar,

                      Yes. The book Quran is also of the past, but the decree is something that is active through time. It is still God who is teaching and not Muhammad, particularly now when he is also no longer here to relay information.

                      If you do not know a man's name what should you do? Well, personally I think his name was Muhammad. And mostly when I write "or whatever his name was" is to reserve myself from comments from people like mmkhan. It is not a matter of disrespect at all. I do not disrespect Muhammad. He was a devout servant of God and that I regard highly.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • M Offline
                        M Offline
                        Mazhar
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #131

                        Mazhar,

                        Yes. The book Quran is also of the past, but the decree is something that is active through time. It is still God who is teaching and not Muhammad, particularly now when he is also no longer here to relay information.

                        If you do not know a man's name what should you do? Well, personally I think his name was Muhammad. And mostly when I write "or whatever his name was" is to reserve myself from comments from people like mmkhan. It is not a matter of disrespect at all. I do not disrespect Muhammad. He was a devout servant of God and that I regard highly.

                        I hope you take this also as decree that is active through time
                        http//haqeeqat.org.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.Arabic%20Text/003.%20Aale%20Imran/3.31PQ.gif
                        http//haqeeqat.org.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.%20Tabweeb/0007.%20Tabe%20Ta%20Ba%20Ain/35.gif
                        http//haqeeqat.org.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.Arabic%20Text/003.%20Aale%20Imran/3.31PR.gif
                        http//haqeeqat.org.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.Arabic%20Text/003.%20Aale%20Imran/3.31PS.gif
                        http//haqeeqat.org.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.Arabic%20Text/2.218b.gif
                        You the Messenger Muhammad pronounce "If you people have been loving Allah the Exalted;
                        Then to demonstrate and prove it you consciously and heartily follow me in letter and spirit without in between there being a third party intervention and influence.

                        If you acted accordingly, Allah the Exalted will in response-reciprocally love-appreciate and acknowledge you people.

                        Moreover, He the Exalted will overlook and grant forgiveness for you people for your earlier wrong-doings.
                        Remember, Allah the Exalted is The Forgiving-Overlooking and the Merciful".

                        We must know the name of the person, the pronoun Ya signifies, who is asking us to follow him in letter and spirit to get the reciprocal love of Allah the Exalted. If we follow the decree, we must ideologically believe we are following him in letter and spirit.

                        Yes we must regard him utmost.

                        Allah the Exalted now "loves" people only conditionally

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • M Offline
                          M Offline
                          Man_of_Faith
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #132

                          Mazhar,

                          I follow God in letter and spirit for it was God that inspired the words to be relayed by Muhammad. His words were not his own but of the one who sent him.

                          Do you not see that you outright idolize Muhammad? Why? Have you not seen that fallacy been done before and now you repeat their mistake?

                          I am surprised about someone who claims to be so skilled in Arabic and interpretation missed some important lessons about the matter of the decree.

                          And once again you post a translation of a passage with inserted words not there in the original Arabic text. Muhammad told people to follow him in the decree and teachings of God just as the messengers of past did. I could as well follow Jesus just as much as Muhammad and it is in the decree and judgment of God that I am told to follow when it is to follow a prophet or messenger.

                          And what Muhammad told is recorded in the book you call Quran so you have what you need to serve God and follow the way Muhammad served The Master or how Abraham or how Moses, or how God wants you to serve more precisely. You live your own life and not copycat someone else's life.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • M Offline
                            M Offline
                            Mazhar
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #133

                            I follow God in letter and spirit

                            http//haqeeqat.org.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.%20Tabweeb/0007.%20Tabe%20Ta%20Ba%20Ain/35.gif

                            Conjunction particle + Verb Imperative; second person; plural; masculine; ; Subject pronoun, in nominative state; noon of protection + Object Pronoun First person; singular, accusative state; Verbal Noun.

                            This verb is not used for Allah the Exalted. Its Root is Root

                            The basic perception infolded in the Root is to practically follow by will, design and affection in such manner that one moves/walks behind remaining adjacent to the one being followed/pursued so that there is no third in between the follower and the one being followed. "" is a calf walking behind his mother. The striking feature, individuality and peculiarity of this Root is the practical and physical aspect of following in action.

                            The perception and meanings infolded in this Root are distinct and absolutely different from that infolded in the Root " " which is translated by English word "obey" and " " by English word "follow" by most of the writers. This is how both the Roots are inadvertently/incorrectly brought closer and at par, as if they both convey similar meanings. English word "Obey" means and conveys the perception "to do as told; be controlled by somebody or something" and the word "follow" means "to obey something, act in accordance with something or instructions and directions given by somebody else". It is thus evident that English word "obey" and "follow" are in proximity of synonymous and both refer to an act while Arabic Roots " " and " " are not synonymous and are distinct from each other.

                            Arabic language is the most scientific language and its Roots enfold all physical/scientific realities and facts relating both to matter and life. A deliberate act of practically and physically following is the result of will/decision and it can take physical execution only by retrieving data, information, instruction, injunction or saying already and previously saved in the memory. A physical act by one's own will and decision/choice reflects and demonstrates his acceptance and liking of the concept and purpose which that act will or is expected to yield.

                            The basic perception infolded in Root " " is to accept something, word, command, direction, injunction, saying, or verbal and written communication, wholeheartedly and affectionately, by will and personal choice without any external pressure/force/fear/compulsion/coercion. The perception and meanings infolded in the Root, " " is the physical demonstration of executing that accepted thing in letter and spirit, exactly in the manner as is told; to follow and move step by step, dot by dot, word by word; move and follow on the footprints of the one being followed. Nothing should intervene, including ones own passions, interests, preconceived notions, desires and conveniences between the follower and the followed, in which case one will satisfy and implement the perception of the Root, and shall thus be the one who acted exactly on that which he had willfully and affectionately accepted.

                            " " has a theoretical/ideological aspect while " " has practical/physical aspect/connotation. It means translating/implementing into action what was accepted. This will also show and prove to others the truthfulness and faithfulness/sincerity of the person that he had accepted that concept/idea/ fact/ saying/ news/ Book truly and wholeheartedly. In sequence/time frame " " is after " " and not conversely. The equation/relationship of these two Roots can be translated as

                            You seem to have neither opened the link I had given nor you properly saw the words of my post, and hastened to once again repeat the same story.
                            We accept Qur'aan as the Word of Allah the Exalted believing in the truthfullness of the elevated Messenger that he trutufully relayed to us and we follow him exactly as he told to act upon the words of Allah the Exalted.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • M Offline
                              M Offline
                              Man_of_Faith
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #134

                              Mazhar,

                              I have no need to read your links and your idolatry. You added way more words in your presentstion of that passage you displayed. And of course I hasten to reply for there is just the same answer. All you seem to care about is your love for Muhammad.

                              You can go and worship your long gone elevated messenger. I won't. I have God's words right in that book.

                              Follow the messenger you do by adhering to the decree by heart and the messenger invited to that faith. I obey the messenger when I follow what was issued in the decree.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • M Offline
                                M Offline
                                Mazhar
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #135

                                I obey the messenger when I follow what was issued in the decree.

                                Yes that is the way. I follow the decree, in letter and spirit, obeying the elevated Messenger. The Messenger is first in timeline then comes to us the decree. Don't reverse the sequence, once one believes in the Book.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • M Offline
                                  M Offline
                                  Man_of_Faith
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #136

                                  Mazhar,

                                  The Messenger is first in timeline then comes to us the decree.

                                  You still do not understand and you keep your elevated messenger more highly than the decree. You are indeed lost. You cannot do anything without mentioning the messenger.

                                  The messengers relay a message; I have told many times, and we can choose to obey and follow the decree or if we were already following the decree so thus we received a good sign that God is present in our lives. But you must no matter what you do always involve your elevated messenger while we follow the word of God and not the word of some man. You do not follow the word of Muhammad when you adhere to the words of the book called Qur'an.

                                  Don't reverse the sequence, once one believes in the Book decree.

                                  See; you do not even know what al-ketaab stands for. Really what do you think it means to "obey the messenger"? Obey the messenger is to follow the decree as issued by God and if you already follow the decree then you have already obeyed a messenger in the past before the one that tells you to obey, so you can just smile and be happy that God shows you a sign unless you do not follow the decree as your messenger told in the past then you may be warned by him and obey the new messenger.

                                  And the decree is the same as it has been for thousands of years, the decree has never changed. So if a man says he follows Moses and does so wholeheartedly and really follow him without hypocrisy then he has not much to fear from the words of a new messenger that comes around, but of course he can and should assist the messenger in the cause of God. Eventually the messenger goes back to God however, so you cannot assist the messenger once gone, although you should still keep the unity within the assembly of God and uphold the decree.

                                  And in your talk there is much singular elevated messenger as you give much obsession with the one named Muhammad and you seem to even focus more on commemorating him rather than really talking about what should be done. You even shook it off when I talked about if you really knew then we should rush for good deeds. We can ask ourselves the question about hypocrisy. You fight more to protect the honor of your "elevated messenger" than talking about the wisdom of what should be done in the light of God also as taught by the one that you protect desperately. You can with happiness talk for hours about the "contact prayer" or salat as a ritual, but are not the Pagans obsessed with such a practice too?

                                  The Messenger is first in timeline then comes to us the decree.

                                  You swear that God will put me in the lowest pit of Hell, but just showing these words to me one can question who will truly be thrown there in Hell. You even put the messenger with capital 'M' in singular as to silently idolize your elevated messenger. Messengers come and messengers go, but the decree remains.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • M Offline
                                    M Offline
                                    Mazhar
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #137

                                    Mazhar,

                                    You still do not understand and you keep your elevated messenger more highly than the decree. You are indeed lost. You cannot do anything without mentioning the messenger.

                                    The messengers relay a message; I have told many times, and we can choose to obey and follow the decree or if we were already following the decree so thus we received a good sign that God is present in our lives. But you must no matter what you do always involve your elevated messenger while we follow the word of God and not the word of some man. You do not follow the word of Muhammad when you adhere to the words of the book called Qur'an.

                                    See; you do not even know what al-ketaab stands for. Really what do you think it means to "obey the messenger"? Obey the messenger is to follow the decree as issued by God and if you already follow the decree then you have already obeyed a messenger in the past before the one that tells you to obey, so you can just smile and be happy that God shows you a sign unless you do not follow the decree as your messenger told in the past then you may be warned by him and obey the new messenger.

                                    And the decree is the same as it has been for thousands of years, the decree has never changed. So if a man says he follows Moses and does so wholeheartedly and really follow him without hypocrisy then he has not much to fear from the words of a new messenger that comes around, but of course he can and should assist the messenger in the cause of God. Eventually the messenger goes back to God however, so you cannot assist the messenger once gone, although you should still keep the unity within the assembly of God and uphold the decree.

                                    And in your talk there is much singular elevated messenger as you give much obsession with the one named Muhammad and you seem to even focus more on commemorating him rather than really talking about what should be done. You even shook it off when I talked about if you really knew then we should rush for good deeds. We can ask ourselves the question about hypocrisy. You fight more to protect the honor of your "elevated messenger" than talking about the wisdom of what should be done in the light of God also as taught by the one that you protect desperately. You can with happiness talk for hours about the "contact prayer" or salat as a ritual, but are not the Pagans obsessed with such a practice too?
                                    You swear that God will put me in the lowest pit of Hell, but just showing these words to me one can question who will truly be thrown there in Hell. You even put the messenger with capital 'M' in singular as to silently idolize your elevated messenger. Messengers come and messengers go, but the decree remains.

                                    Pagans and Muna'fi'qeen have one thing common

                                    Pagans say why they be guided through the Messenger; why not Angels come to them; Why not verbal passages are communicated to them; and when they cannot answer or rebut any of the communication given by the Messenger, they start progpagating in people that he is obsessed, possessed. The Messenger is the problem issue for the Pagans.

                                    Muna'fi'qeen are worst people than the Pagans because they falsely proclaim to belong to the company of believers but have the same problem issue the Messenger.

                                    I am already told the views that you have expressed in quote which are peculiar trait of Muna'fi'qeen
                                    http//haqeeqat.org.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.Arabic%20Text/004.%20An%20Nisa/4.142a.gif
                                    http//haqeeqat.org.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.Arabic%20Text/2.09a.gif
                                    http//haqeeqat.org.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.Arabic%20Text/004.%20An%20Nisa/4.142b.gif
                                    http//haqeeqat.org.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.Arabic%20Text/004.%20An%20Nisa/temp%2014%20%204.142.gif
                                    http//haqeeqat.org.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.Arabic%20Text/004.%20An%20Nisa/temp%2014%20%204.142b.gif
                                    Indeed the Muna'fi'qeen Imposter Believers seek by contrary to fact verbal proclamation to beguile Allah the Exalted;

                                    While the fact is that He the Exalted lets them engulfed in their deceptive perception by leaving them as discarded/condemned.

                                    And when they get up to join the Ass-sa'laat congregation they stand reluctantly and irritant with heavy heart. They just stand for feigning to people that they are believers.

                                    And they do not remember Allah the Exalted except occasionally.

                                    Muna'fi'qeen will get the worst end as compared to Pagans

                                    http//haqeeqat.org.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.Arabic%20Text/004.%20An%20Nisa/temp%2014%20%204.145.gif
                                    http//haqeeqat.org.pk/English%20Tafsir%20e%20Haqeeqat/00.Arabic%20Text/004.%20An%20Nisa/temp%2014%20%204.145a.gif

                                    Know the fact; Muna'fi'qeen the Imposter believers will certainly be placed in the lowest-worst class of the Hell-Prison.

                                    And you the Messenger will never find anyone inclined for helping them.

                                    Be happy. Try to live in future if you wish not to be in the past.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • S Offline
                                      S Offline
                                      savage_carrot
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #138

                                      Calling people derogatory titles instead of addressing the issues is not acceptable. Consider this a warning.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • M Offline
                                        M Offline
                                        Mazhar
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #139

                                        Calling people derogatory titles instead of addressing the issues is not acceptable. Consider this a warning.

                                        What is the derogatory title in the quote, madam

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • S Offline
                                          S Offline
                                          savage_carrot
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #140

                                          Munafiqeen, good sir. If you want any further discussion/questions about this, please use the PM function.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users