Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. Critical Examination of Islam
  3. Quranic Divinity
  4. How Authentic is the Quran?

How Authentic is the Quran?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Quranic Divinity
177 Posts 14 Posters 7.6k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    KGB
    wrote on last edited by
    #101

    Albion I copy and paste the Yusuf Ali transalation as it is.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M Offline
      M Offline
      mquran
      wrote on last edited by
      #102

      So ur best defence is that its all a conspiracy? . Yes, everything is conspiracy mquran. Everything that ur mind is too small to understand is a conspiracy. Everything that you dont agree with is a conspiracy.

      A very interesting prerequisite in the participation of forums is the ability to read. Jaxal, did you see the word 'conspiracy' in my post? All im saying is, a manuscript found somewhere doesn't prove anything. You think it proves something? Then why don't you tell us, what does a manuscript prove?

      Yet you say Moses/Musa wasnt given the Torah?

      Again, the inability to read. Is the Quran really so closed to you? Joe quoted 2/53 RIGHT ABOVE your post and you have to ask him? Sigh....

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • T Offline
        T Offline
        TheNabi
        wrote on last edited by
        #103

        Salaam Jaxal,

        Yet you say Moses/Musa wasnt given the Torah?

        YES!!

        Exactly. Now you have it. To prove that he was not go to your quran and show me some ayatin or even one ayat that shows me that moosa is given tauraat. I'll be waiting.

        Joe

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • T Offline
          T Offline
          TheNabi
          wrote on last edited by
          #104

          Salaam,

          Oh yea, neither Anwar nor MQ were speaking of conspiracies on either of the two threads in which you have assumed that they were.

          Joe

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Offline
            M Offline
            mquran
            wrote on last edited by
            #105

            Its not a matter of a conspiracies at all. Its a matter of where we are and what we're left with. I noticed this some time back when comparing the philosophies of religion and al-quraan. Al-quraan doesn't require you to play Indiana Jones and look for where Ibrahim, Musa and all the other guys are buried. Who CARES? Is God going to ask you 'o mq, at what age did Aisha marry Mohamed?' . No, he gave us the operational manual. Don't find out how your ancestors used windows. YOU read the manual and YOU use it for urself. When the test comes, it'll be on how YOU used windows to exploit the potential of your pc, not how your grandfather used it.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • J Offline
              J Offline
              Jaxal
              wrote on last edited by
              #106

              SaLam Joe and mquran

              Joe If moses/musa wasnt given the Torah, then who was?

              mquran

              Then why don't you tell us, what does a manuscript prove?

              How many of you are there? Anyways, you say i cant read, yet you have seemed to miss the whole point of this thread. You say its not enough. Something is in front of your eyes. And you say you dont want to beleive it. You are a true example when God says

              GOD seals their minds and their hearing, and their eyes are veiled. They have incurred severe retribution.

              Truth is truth. Weather written on a paper, or sent down through Angel Gabriel. Dont be threatened by it. God asks us to accept the truth, even if it is found in the previous scriptures. If the evidence is so weak, then it should be easy to refute. So far, u have just babbled and not given any actual proof that the evidence is wrong becoz of so and so. Simply denying it is no actualy proof. Pur your words where your mouth is and bring actualy evidence to prove it wrong.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M Offline
                M Offline
                mquran
                wrote on last edited by
                #107

                Truth is truth. Weather written on a paper, or sent down through Angel Gabriel. Dont be threatened by it.

                So anyone can write anything on a goatskin and it would be truth for you? Marvellous ! very marvellous indeed

                God asks us to accept the truth, even if it is found in the previous scriptures.

                Where does God tell us to accept 'what is found in PREVIOUS SCRIPTURES' ? Have you actually opened the Quran before?

                If the evidence is so weak, then it should be easy to refute. So far, u have just babbled and not given any actual proof that the evidence is wrong becoz of so and so. Simply denying it is no actualy proof. Pur your words where your mouth is and bring actualy evidence to prove it wrong

                There's no point in giving evidence to you. You treat the Quran like a piece of excretion anyway. You claim 'quran teaches democracy' and 'god tells us to accept the truth' WITHOUT EVER CHECKING THE BOOK. Maybe you're the new messenger or something. The first messenger who never ever opens the book because it contradicts him at every point.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • J Offline
                  J Offline
                  Jaxal
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #108

                  SaLam mquran

                  There's no point in giving evidence to you.

                  Be decent and say you cant prove it wrong. That is much more noble than to rant on and on about how something cannot be accepted when you have nothig to support that.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • M Offline
                    M Offline
                    mquran
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #109

                    Be decent and say you cant prove it wrong. That is much more noble than to rant on and on about how something cannot be accepted when you have nothig to support that.

                    I can't prove it wrong, you're right but only to people like you WHO DO NOT BELIEVE IN THE BOOK. You prefer to believe the hadith , the source material for this malarkey, so that's fine. You can do whatever you want. I imagine you can't even tell me what my argument is. Care to try? You know what they say about fools keeping thier mouths shut . Want to banish the doubt ? Go on, tell me what my argument is, if you can.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • J Offline
                      J Offline
                      Jaxal
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #110

                      SaLaM mquran

                      Allah Hu Akbar mquran

                      I can't prove it wrong, you're right

                      I AM right http//www.geocities.com/bigjaxal/r1.gif

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • M Offline
                        M Offline
                        mquran
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #111

                        Yeah, I knew you didn't understand at all my point. It's ok, ask your social worker to direct you to a zoological facility. The apes there can probably help you out.

                        Allahu AKBAR? wow, the sunni shows his spots yet again. Nice one.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • E Offline
                          E Offline
                          Elena
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #112

                          Peace,

                          what a cryptic dialogue you both are having. Why mquran and The Nabi speak like this to Jaxal?, mquran in this thread and The Nabi in another thread. What's the problem in speaking simple questions and answers?

                          Maybe you three are having lots of fun but others, me, gets nothing.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • J Offline
                            J Offline
                            Jaxal
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #113

                            SaLaM Elena

                            Actually i understand their skepticism. There was a time when I too dealt this information with hostility. But later i understood the bigger picture. God guides who He wills. Maybe in time they too will understand http//www.geocities.com/bigjaxal/s1.gif

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • M Offline
                              M Offline
                              mquran
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #114

                              what a cryptic dialogue you both are having. Why mquran and The Nabi speak like this to Jaxal?, mquran in this thread and The Nabi in another thread. What's the problem in speaking simple questions and answers?
                              Maybe you three are having lots of fun but others, me, gets nothing.

                              Elena, any question at all you want answering, I'd be quite happy to attempt to do so. With this person, I am unable to answer directly because he lacks the civility to answer questions directly. To this point, he cannot tell us what my argument was, even though he deems it wrong. I find this very amusing but I guess I'll have to stop soon.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • P Offline
                                P Offline
                                Prince
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #115

                                Salaam Jaxal & MQuran!

                                Interesting topic this is and I had to post so I can get a better understanding because at this very moment I'm in two minds whether the Quran is changed or not. Now correct me if I'm wrong Jaxal and Mquran.

                                I see Jaxals point that the Quran does say the Reminder is protected BUT we have different Quran's all over the world whether its additions or alterations. God says the message is protected or the physical Quran itself, maybe God is talking about the essence of the message and not the physical book itself, God knows best.

                                MQuran I also understand your point too that if the Quran says it is unaltered then an external source i.e old manuscript doesn't prove anything and could be a throw off to leave doubts in peoples minds. It's tricky for me because there are different versions(looking at the historical manuscripts if they are really historical which maybe scientists can prove somehow) of Quran but how do you know the ONE your studying is the right one or is the true message of God.

                                It's all up in the air for me guys so i'm just throwing ideas at you to debate further so I get a better understanding and also for the benefit of other readers because at the moment im ? lol

                                PEACE

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • J Offline
                                  J Offline
                                  Jaxal
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #116

                                  SaLaM 2Pac

                                  There are 3 reasons why i have no doubt nor any problem stating that the Quran has been changed/altered

                                  1] I have seen it with my own eyes.
                                  2] There are , as you said, different versions of the Quran out there which had additions to it so that its easier to pronounce.
                                  3] I dont believe Quran is THE book. This one is a bit hard to explain, becoz it is my own person belief, but i will try.

                                  Firstly, God has sent us 3 scriptures. Torah, Gospel and Quran. God asks us to rfer to the previous scripture when and if we are in doubt. This shows that we should follow the truth that is in the previous scriptures. I agree the previous scriptures have been changed. But not completely. Find the truth in there, and follow it.

                                  Second, in revelations, there is a passage where God tells the prophet to stop writing. Something is said by God which is unkown. therefore, i dont think God has given us a complete message/scripture. I couldnt find any verse in the Quran which says that Quran is a complete book. Being a detailed book and being a complete book are two different things. Agree? I think the complete message/scripture is with God. THAT is the message/scriputre that is guarded. Becoz if you come to think of it, there is NOTHING stopping me to add 1 letter to the Quran and print it. chances are no one will evennotice it. I have a publishing business so i DO have the means to do it. How will God protect it? Will God come down and stop me? Will a bolt of lightening strike me? I dont think so.

                                  LAstly, If you DO agree with the above, then there literally is no way i can change the message/scripture. We know from the goespel that it isnt a completel book. And i cant find any verse in the Quran that says that this is a complete book.

                                  PLUS, we have evidence in front of us. Anyone one is welcomed to view the thread in my post. If it was hear say, i wouldnt beleive it either. But its right in front of our eyes. And if it is such a weak evidence then we should have no problem refuting it. But so far no one has.

                                  Hope this clear things up for you. http//www.geocities.com/bigjaxal/s1.gif

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • M Offline
                                    M Offline
                                    mquran
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #117

                                    2PAC MQuran I also understand your point too that if the Quran says it is unaltered then an external source i.e old manuscript doesn't prove anything and could be a throw off to leave doubts in peoples minds. It's tricky for me because there are different versions(looking at the historical manuscripts if they are really historical which maybe scientists can prove somehow) of Quran but how do you know the ONE your studying is the right one or is the true message of God.

                                    Salaam 2pac,

                                    Can you please tell me what a 'scientific' and 'historical manuscript' is, please? Is it fair that when al-quraan has set its own criteria for authentication, we chuck an alien criteria at it?

                                    How can we possibly know where those manuscripts came from? If we believe those manuscripts we must - by that same alien criteria - believe in hadith.

                                    Jaxal 1] I have seen it with my own eyes.

                                    He saw goatskins which some guy said was the Quran. Wow, major revelation ! We could get some goatskin and write the quran on it, thus possibly correcting him but he's not worth the bother, really. Its good to have this guy around when sunnis come in. They'd chuck the hadith far more quickly.

                                    2] There are , as you said, different versions of the Quran out there which had additions to it so that its easier to pronounce

                                    Utter rubbish once again. WHOLE WORDS have been added. This is what comes from being lazy to read. You simply get false info.

                                    Firstly, God has sent us 3 scriptures. Torah, Gospel and Quran. God asks us to rfer to the previous scripture when and if we are in doubt. This shows that we should follow the truth that is in the previous scriptures. I agree the previous scriptures have been changed. But not completely. Find the truth in there, and follow it.

                                    Utter rubbish, nowhere does the Quran EVER use the words 'previous' scripture. 2pac, why don't you ask him for evidence. Lets see if he actually listens to you.

                                    How on earth is he going to 'find the truth in the 'previous scripture'' , I wonder? Is al-quraan going to be the criteria ? If it is, then what's the point of having the 'previous scripture' if al-quraan already said what is being said?

                                    Second, in revelations, there is a passage where God tells the prophet to stop writing. Something is said by God which is unkown. therefore, i dont think God has given us a complete message/scripture

                                    I think we need to contact Broadmoor and have this guy committed. He's obviously seeing things and live in a cloud cuckoo land where in his Quran, God told the prophet to STOP writing. This verse , of course, NOWHERE EXISTS in the entire al-quraan. But this is what comes from either pretending to study al-quraan when one hasn't or reading the quran as one would a trashy novel. Its really tickling to see the kind of nonsense that's said in here, honestly. First, it was 'god teaches democracy' and to do hajj in mecca and now this.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • J Offline
                                      J Offline
                                      Jaxal
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #118

                                      SaLaM mquran

                                      Loooooooooooooooooooooollllllllllll why so much hate??? You need to watch Anger Management.

                                      An angry man, shuts his eyes and opens his mouth.

                                      Thats for you. Dont be an angry man mquran. You need to calm down. This is a forum for discussion. Be decent. Not everyone believes in some crap like Quran is anti-democratic or that the criteria to be a messenger is to have good presentation skills. You need to learn how to not take things personally. rotfl

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • P Offline
                                        P Offline
                                        Prince
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #119

                                        Salaam 2pac,

                                        Can you please tell me what a 'scientific' and 'historical manuscript' is, please? Is it fair that when al-quraan has set its own criteria for authentication, we chuck an alien criteria at it?

                                        If scientists can prove that goatskin is dated close to Prophet Muhammeds time then it might be something worth looking into because if there's different versions of the Quran which ONE is the correct one. Please tell me what criteria has al-quraan used for authentication for the correct one??Sorry if I come across as being pessimist but things like this need to be addressed.

                                        PEACE

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • T Offline
                                          T Offline
                                          TheNabi
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #120

                                          Salaam 2Pac,

                                          See ayatin 4153; 5120-21

                                          Joe

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users